Patent Grant
11950057
The present application relates to hearing devices, in particular hearing aids or headsets.
A primary aim of any hearing aid system is to improve the ability of the user to understand speech. This is done by amplifying incoming sounds and by attempting to remove unwanted noise and distortion. While amplification can improve intelligibility in quiet environments, it is necessary to employ high performing noise reduction and speech enhancement algorithms in noisy situations.
An estimate of user's intelligibility of speech present in a current (noisy) input signal is a valuable parameter for use in deciding an appropriate current processing of the input signal.
The present disclosure proposes to estimate the intelligibility of a speech signal based on voice activity detection—or more generally, speech presence probability (SPP)—a quantity known from the area of speech enhancement. Intuitively, it seems reasonable that speech intelligibility is high, if a detection algorithm detects the presence of speech with high probability—and vice versa.
The present disclosure relates to signal processing methods for predicting the intelligibility of speech, e.g., in the form of an index, i.e., a number (scalar) that correlates highly with the fraction of words that an average listener would be able to understand from some speech material. Specifically, solutions are presented to the problem of predicting the intelligibility of speech signals, which are distorted, e.g., by noise or reverberation, and which might have been passed through some signal processing device, e.g., a hearing device, such as a hearing aid. The invention is characterized by the fact that the intelligibility prediction is based on the noisy/processed signal only—in the literature, such methods are called non-intrusive intelligibility predictors, cf. e.g. EP3057335A1, EP3203473A1.
The non-intrusive class of methods, which we focus on in the present invention, is in contrast to the much larger class of methods which require a noise-free and unprocessed reference speech signal to be available too (e.g. [ANSI; 1995], [Rhebergen & Versfeld; 2005], [Taal et al.; 2011], EP3220661 A1, etc.)—this class of methods is called intrusive.
The use of a speech intelligibility measure to check the performance of a hearing aid processing algorithm, e.g. for enhancing speech (e.g. a noise reduction algorithm), has been proposed, cf. e.g. [Hoang et al.; 2021], [Martin-Donas et al.; 2020], [BaumgArtel et al.; 2015]. These references do not, however, as proposed in the present disclosure, use a speech presence probability measure to determine the speech intelligibility measure.
The proposed hearing device allows an estimation of the intelligibility experienced by—for example—a hearing aid user, at a given moment in time. This knowledge can be used for various purposes, e.g., adaptation of the signal processing schemes employed in the hearing device (HD), for example a noise reduction algorithm, such as a beamformer/noise reduction algorithm in order to increase intelligibility (perhaps at the cost of suppressing more background noise in the incoming signal, and, hence, isolating the user from acoustic environment) or, oppositely, or to decrease the aggressiveness of a noise reduction system, because intelligibility is already sufficient. Obviously, adaptation of other algorithms in the hearing device (HD) can also or alternatively be envisaged.
A Hearing Aid:
In an aspect of the present application, a hearing device, e.g. a hearing aid, adapted for being worn by a user is provided. The hearing device comprises
The speech intelligibility prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility in dependence of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability.
Thereby an improved hearing device, e.g. a hearing aid, may be provided.
The terms ‘predicted speech presence probability’ and ‘estimated speech presence probability’ (or ‘measure of’ said items) are used interchangeably in the present disclosure without any intended difference in meaning. Likewise, the terms ‘predicted speech intelligibility’ and ‘estimated speech intelligibility’ (or ‘measure of’ said items) are used interchangeably in the present disclosure without any intended difference in meaning. Likewise, the terms ‘speech intelligibility estimator’ and ‘speech intelligibility predictor’ are used interchangeably in the present disclosure without any intended difference in meaning. Likewise, the terms ‘speech presence probability estimator’ and ‘speech presence probability predictor’ are used interchangeably in the present disclosure without any intended difference in meaning.
The hearing device, e.g. the speech presence probability prediction unit, may be configured to repeatedly over time provide said measure of the predicted speech presence probability. The predicted speech presence probability may e.g. be provided with a well-defined (e.g. pre-determined, or adaptively determined) repetition frequency, e.g. related to a characteristic time unit of the hearing device, e.g. of the input unit. The current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility may be a function (ƒ(.))(at least) of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability (but may be influenced by other parameters as well).
The speech intelligibility prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility as a function (ƒ(.)) of a present value and a number of (e.g. recent) past values of said measure of the predicted speech presence probability. The number of recent past values may be the last M−1 past values of the predicted speech presence probability. The value of M may be related to characteristic elements of speech, e.g. syllables, or words, or sentences. Typical values of M may correspond to time durations of one or more sentences. Typical values of M may correspond to time durations of (e.g. at least) 100 ms, 200 ms, 500 ms, 1 s, 5 s, or 10 s, or 20 s or more. A time unit of the time index m may be the length of a time frame, or a fraction thereof (e.g. ½, if overlap is 50%), e.g. of the order of 1 ms.
The hearing device may comprise a mapping unit configured to provide a mapping of the at least one electric input signal from a first domain having a first dimension to a second domain having a second dimension, wherein the mapping is a non-linear or linear mapping, and wherein the second dimension is equal to or different from said first dimension. The first domain may have a first dimension (P). The second domain may have a second dimension (Q). P may be smaller than or equal to or larger than Q. A linear mapping may e.g. be represented by a Fourier transform. A non-linear mapping may e.g. be represented by a a neural network. The first domain may e.g. be the time-domain. The first dimension may e.g. be represented by a number (P) of time samples ‘stacked’ in a frame of the electric input signal. The first domain may e.g. be the (time-)frequency domain. The first dimension may e.g. be represented by a number (P) of time-frequency tiles ‘stacked’ in a frame of the electric input signal. The second domain may e.g. be the (time-)frequency dimension. The second dimension may e.g. be represented by a number (Q) of time-frequency tiles ‘stacked’ ‘in a frame of the electric input signal.
The input unit may be configured to provide the at least one electric input signal in a transform domain representation. The hearing device, e.g. the input unit, and or an antenna and transceiver unit configured to receive one or more of the at least one electric input signal may comprise a transform unit for converting a time domain signal to a signal in the transform domain (e.g. a frequency domain, a Cosine transform domain, etc.). The transform unit may be constituted by or comprise a time-frequency-conversion unit for providing a time-frequency representation of an input signal. The speech presence probability may be provided in a transform domain. The current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility may be provided in a transform domain.
The input unit may be configured to provide the at least one electric input signal in a time-frequency representation (km), k being a frequency band index, m being a time index. The hearing device, e.g. the input unit, may comprise at least one analysis filter bank configured to provide said at least one electric input signal in a time-frequency representation (km), k being a frequency band index, m being a time index. The analysis filter bank may comprise a Fourier transform algorithm for transforming a time domain signal to number of frequency sub-band signals in the time-frequency domain (k,m). The hearing device, e.g. the input unit, may comprise at least one analogue to digital converter for converting an analogue electric input signal to a digitized electric input signal (as a stream of digitized audio samples), e.g. with a certain sample frequency, e.g. 20 kHz.
Speech Presence Probabilities may also be provided in other domains than the time-frequency (e.g. short-time Fourier Transform) domain, for example:
For these domains, SPPs are integrated across all dimensions including the recent past, m-M+1:M (this is completely analogous to the STFT domain situation), in order to provide temporal SI estimates.
The speech presence probability prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility in a number of time frequency units (km). The speech presence probability prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility in a multitude of time frequency units (k,m) of a given time frame m′, where k=1, . . . , K.
A time-frequency tile exhibiting a predicted speech presence probability (SPP) close to 1 (SPP(k,m)=1) may be assigned a predicted speech intelligibility (SI) of close to 100% (SI(k,m) 100%). The predicted speech presence probabilities SPP(k,m′) for a given time frame (m′) may be combined to provide a consolidated speech presence probability SPP(l′) or for a number L of time frames, e.g. for frame m′ and the L−1 previous time frames. A single estimate of speech intelligibility of a given time frame (m) may be based a) on said individual speech presence probabilities SPP(k,m′) of the given time frame (m′), b) on said consolidated speech presence probability SPP(m′) for the given time frame (m′), or c) including historic values (e.g. L−1 previous values relative to the given time frame (m′)) of said individual speech presence probabilities SPP(km), or of said consolidated speech presence probability SPP(m′).
The speech intelligibility prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility as a function of a present value and a number of past values of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability, wherein the present value and the number of past values is M×K, where M is a number of time units and K is a number of frequency units. The number M may include the current time frame and the M−1 frames preceding the current time frame. In a time-frequency representation, the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility Îm may be determined as
Îm=ƒ(Pk,m′), k=1, . . . ,K; m′=m−M+1, . . . m,
where Pk,m′ denotes the measure of the predicted speech presence probability at the kth frequency index and m′th index, in K frequency channels and M observations in the recent past, and ƒ(.) denotes a function that maps the measure of the predicted speech presence probability to the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility, cf. e.g.
The speech intelligibility prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility in dependence of an, optionally normalized, sum of the present value and the number of past values of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability. The number of past values (M−1) may be larger than one, e.g. larger than two, such as larger than five, e.g. larger than ten. The number of past values (M−1) may e.g. correspond to a duration of a speech element, e.g. a syllable or word. The function (ƒ(.) referred to above may thus be arithmetic average. In a time-frequency representation, the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility Îm may be determined as a sum of the values of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability Pk,m for the K frequency units of the M last time (frame) units (i.e. K×M-values), e.g. determined as an arithmetic average
where is m is the current time (frame) index.
The speech intelligibility prediction unit may be configured to determine the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility in dependence of a weighted sum of the present value and the number of past values of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability. The function ƒ(.) referred to above may thus be weighted sum. The sum of the weights may be equal to one. Other functions may be logarithmic transform. The function ƒ(.) may provide a compressive transform. The function ƒ(.) may provide a quantization of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability Pk,m. The function ƒ(.) may provide a max-pooling of the (e.g. K×M) present and recent past values of the measure of the predicted speech presence probability values, Pk,m.
The hearing device may be configured to provide that the function (ƒ(.)) is a data-driven model, learned from training data.
The hearing device may be configured to provide that the function ƒ(.) is provided by a deep neural network whose parameters are learned offline—before use of the hearing device—using training data comprising estimated speech presence probabilities Pk,m′, k=1, . . . , K; m′=m−M+1, . . . m, for a particular noisy or processed time segment of a speech signal along with ground truth speech intelligibility of that speech segment. The ground truth speech intelligibility of that speech segments used for training (i.e., desired output of the data-driven model ƒ(.)) may e.g. be measured in listening tests with human test subjects. Details of the approach for training deep neural networks for intelligibility prediction is e.g. described in [Pedersen et al.; 2020], but this work differs from the proposed approach, because it does not rely on speech presence probabilities and assumes access to a noise-free reference signal.
The hearing device may comprise a control unit (e.g. a controller) configured to provide appropriate parameters (e.g. processing parameters) for use in the processing of the at least one electric input signal in dependence of the current estimate (currently predicted measure) of speech intelligibility.
The signal processing unit may comprise at least one processing algorithm configured to be applied to an input signal to the signal processing unit (e.g. the at least one electric input signal or a signal or signals originating therefrom). The at least one processing algorithm may comprise a noise reduction algorithm, e.g. comprising a directional system (beamformer). The controller may be configured to provide one or more processing parameters of the at least one processing algorithm. The one or more processing parameters may be provided in dependence of the current measure of the predicted speech intelligibility.
The input unit may be configured to provide at least two time-variant electric input signals representing sound. The hearing device (e.g. a hearing aid) may comprise a beamformer configured to provide a beamformed signal in dependence of the at least two time-variant electric input signals and fixed or adaptively updated beamformer weights. The hearing device may comprise a controller. The controller may be configured to control the beamformer (e.g. via the beamformer weights) in dependence of the estimate of speech intelligibility L.
The controller may be configured to control the beamformer weights wij(k,m) in dependence of Î{umlaut over (()}m) to increase omni-directionality of the beamformer, the higher the estimate of speech intelligibility Î(m). Correspondingly, the beamformer weights may be controlled to increase focus of the beamformer, the lower the estimate of speech intelligibility Î(m).
The hearing device may be constituted by or comprise a hearing aid, a headset, an earphone, an ear protection device, or a combination thereof.
The hearing device may be constituted by or comprise an air-conduction type hearing aid, a bone-conduction type hearing aid, a cochlear implant type hearing aid, or a combination thereof.
The hearing device may be adapted to provide a frequency dependent gain and/or a level dependent compression and/or a transposition (with or without frequency compression) of one or more frequency ranges to one or more other frequency ranges, e.g. to compensate for a hearing impairment of a user. The hearing device may comprise a signal processor for enhancing the input signals and providing a processed output signal.
The hearing device may comprise an output unit for providing a stimulus perceived by the user as an acoustic signal based on a processed electric signal. The output unit may comprise a number of electrodes of a cochlear implant (for a CI type hearing aid) or a vibrator of a bone conducting hearing aid. The output unit may comprise an output transducer. The output transducer may comprise a receiver (loudspeaker) for providing the stimulus as an acoustic signal to the user (e.g. in an acoustic (air conduction based) hearing aid). The output transducer may comprise a vibrator for providing the stimulus as mechanical vibration of a skull bone to the user (e.g. in a bone-attached or bone-anchored hearing aid).
The hearing device may comprise an input unit for providing an electric input signal representing sound. The input unit may comprise an input transducer, e.g. a microphone, for converting an input sound to an electric input signal. The input unit may comprise a wireless receiver for receiving a wireless signal comprising or representing sound and for providing an electric input signal representing said sound. The wireless receiver may e.g. be configured to receive an electromagnetic signal in the radio frequency range (3 kHz to 300 GHz). The wireless receiver may e.g. be configured to receive an electromagnetic signal in a frequency range of light (e.g. infrared light 300 GHz to 430 THz, or visible light, e.g. 430 THz to 770 THz).
The hearing device may comprise a directional microphone system adapted to spatially filter sounds from the environment, and thereby enhance a target acoustic source among a multitude of acoustic sources in the local environment of the user wearing the hearing device. The directional system may be adapted to detect (such as adaptively detect) from which direction a particular part of the microphone signal originates. This can be achieved in various different ways as e.g. described in the prior art. In hearing devices, a microphone array beamformer is often used for spatially attenuating background noise sources. Many beamformer variants can be found in literature. The minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer is widely used in microphone array signal processing. Ideally the MVDR beamformer keeps the signals from the target direction (also referred to as the look direction) unchanged, while attenuating sound signals from other directions maximally. The generalized sidelobe canceller (GSC) structure is an equivalent representation of the MVDR beamformer offering computational and numerical advantages over a direct implementation in its original form.
The hearing device may comprise antenna and transceiver circuitry allowing a wireless link to an entertainment device (e.g. a TV-set), a communication device (e.g. a telephone), a wireless microphone, or another hearing device, etc. The hearing device may thus be configured to wirelessly receive a direct electric input signal from another device. Likewise, the hearing device may be configured to wirelessly transmit a direct electric output signal to another device. The direct electric input or output signal may represent or comprise an audio signal and/or a control signal and/or an information signal.
In general, a wireless link established by antenna and transceiver circuitry of the hearing device can be of any type. The wireless link may be a link based on near-field communication, e.g. an inductive link based on an inductive coupling between antenna coils of transmitter and receiver parts. The wireless link may be based on far-field, electromagnetic radiation. Preferably, frequencies used to establish a communication link between the hearing device and the other device is below 70 GHz, e.g. located in a range from 50 MHz to 70 GHz, e.g. above 300 MHz, e.g. in an ISM range above 300 MHz, e.g. in the 900 MHz range or in the 2.4 GHz range or in the 5.8 GHz range or in the 60 GHz range (ISM=Industrial, Scientific and Medical, such standardized ranges being e.g. defined by the International Telecommunication Union, ITU). The wireless link may be based on a standardized or proprietary technology. The wireless link may be based on Bluetooth technology (e.g. Bluetooth Low-Energy technology).
The hearing device may be or form part of a portable (i.e. configured to be wearable) device, e.g. a device comprising a local energy source, e.g. a battery, e.g. a rechargeable battery. The hearing device may e.g. be a low weight, easily wearable, device, e.g. having a total weight less than 300 g, such as less than 100 g, such as less than 20 g.
The hearing device may comprise a ‘forward’ (or ‘signal’) path for processing an audio signal between an input and an output of the hearing device. A signal processor may be located in the forward path. The signal processor may be adapted to provide a frequency dependent gain according to a user's particular needs (e.g. hearing impairment). The hearing device may comprise an ‘analysis’ path comprising functional components for analyzing signals and/or controlling processing of the forward path. Some or all signal processing of the analysis path and/or the forward path may be conducted in the frequency domain, in which case the hearing device comprises appropriate analysis and synthesis filter banks. Some or all signal processing of the analysis path and/or the forward path may be conducted in the time domain.
An analogue electric signal representing an acoustic signal may be converted to a digital audio signal in an analogue-to-digital (AD) conversion process, where the analogue signal is sampled with a predefined sampling frequency or rate fs, fs being e.g. in the range from 8 kHz to 48 kHz (adapted to the particular needs of the application) to provide digital samples xn (or x[n]) at discrete points in time tn (or n), each audio sample representing the value of the acoustic signal at to by a predefined number Nb of bits, Nb being e.g. in the range from 1 to 48 bits, e.g. 24 bits. Each audio sample is hence quantized using Nb bits (resulting in 2N different possible values of the audio sample). A digital sample x has a length in time of 1/fs, e.g. 50 ρs, for ƒs=20 kHz. A number of audio samples may be arranged in a time frame. A time frame may comprise 64 or 128 audio data samples. Other frame lengths may be used depending on the practical application.
The hearing device may comprise an analogue-to-digital (AD) converter to digitize an analogue input (e.g. from an input transducer, such as a microphone) with a predefined sampling rate, e.g. 20 kHz. The hearing device may comprise a digital-to-analogue (DA) converter to convert a digital signal to an analogue output signal, e.g. for being presented to a user via an output transducer.
The hearing device, e.g. the input unit, and or the antenna and transceiver circuitry may comprise a TF-conversion unit for providing a time-frequency representation of an input signal. The time-frequency representation may comprise an array or map of corresponding complex or real values of the signal in question in a particular time and frequency range. The TF conversion unit may comprise a filter bank for filtering a (time varying) input signal and providing a number of (time varying) output signals each comprising a distinct frequency range of the input signal. The TF conversion unit may comprise a Fourier transformation unit for converting a time variant input signal to a (time variant) signal in the (time-)frequency domain. The frequency range considered by the hearing device from a minimum frequency fmin to a maximum frequency fmax may comprise a part of the typical human audible frequency range from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, e.g. a part of the range from 20 Hz to 12 kHz. Typically, a sample rate fs is larger than or equal to twice the maximum frequency fmax, fs≥2fmax. A signal of the forward and/or analysis path of the hearing device may be split into a number NI of frequency bands (e.g. of uniform width), where NI is e.g. larger than 5, such as larger than 10, such as larger than 50, such as larger than 100, such as larger than 500, at least some of which are processed individually. The hearing device may be adapted to process a signal of the forward and/or analysis path in a number NP of different frequency channels (NP≤NI). The frequency channels may be uniform or non-uniform in width (e.g. increasing in width with frequency), overlapping or non-overlapping.
The hearing device may be configured to operate in different modes, e.g. a normal mode and one or more specific modes, e.g. selectable by a user, or automatically selectable. A mode of operation may be optimized to a specific acoustic situation or environment. A mode of operation may include a low-power mode, where functionality of the hearing device is reduced (e.g. to save power), e.g. to disable wireless communication, and/or to disable specific features of the hearing device.
The hearing device may comprise a number of detectors configured to provide status signals relating to a current physical environment of the hearing device (e.g. the current acoustic environment), and/or to a current state of the user wearing the hearing device, and/or to a current state or mode of operation of the hearing device. Alternatively or additionally, one or more detectors may form part of an external device in communication (e.g. wirelessly) with the hearing device. An external device may e.g. comprise another hearing device, a remote control, and audio delivery device, a telephone (e.g. a smartphone), an external sensor, etc.
One or more of the number of detectors may operate on the full band signal (time domain). One or more of the number of detectors may operate on band split signals ((time-) frequency domain), e.g. in a limited number of frequency bands.
The number of detectors may comprise a level detector for estimating a current level of a signal of the forward path. The detector may be configured to decide whether the current level of a signal of the forward path is above or below a given (L-)threshold value. The level detector operates on the full band signal (time domain). The level detector operates on band split signals ((time-) frequency domain).
The hearing device may comprise a voice activity detector (VAD) for estimating whether or not (or with what probability) an input signal comprises a voice signal (at a given point in time). A voice signal may in the present context be taken to include a speech signal from a human being. It may also include other forms of utterances generated by the human speech system (e.g. singing). The voice activity detector unit may be adapted to classify a current acoustic environment of the user as a VOICE or NO-VOICE environment. This has the advantage that time segments of the electric microphone signal comprising human utterances (e.g. speech) in the user's environment can be identified, and thus separated from time segments only (or mainly) comprising other sound sources (e.g. artificially generated noise). The voice activity detector may be adapted to detect as a VOICE also the user's own voice. Alternatively, the voice activity detector may be adapted to exclude a user's own voice from the detection of a VOICE.
The hearing device may comprise an own voice detector for estimating whether or not (or with what probability) a given input sound (e.g. a voice, e.g. speech) originates from the voice of the user of the system. A microphone system of the hearing device may be adapted to be able to differentiate between a user's own voice and another person's voice and possibly from NON-voice sounds.
The number of detectors may comprise a movement detector, e.g. an acceleration sensor. The movement detector may be configured to detect movement of the user's facial muscles and/or bones, e.g. due to speech or chewing (e.g. jaw movement) and to provide a detector signal indicative thereof.
The hearing device may comprise a classification unit configured to classify the current situation based on input signals from (at least some of) the detectors, and possibly other inputs as well. In the present context ‘a current situation’ may be taken to be defined by one or more of
a) the physical environment (e.g. including the current electromagnetic environment, e.g. the occurrence of electromagnetic signals (e.g. comprising audio and/or control signals) intended or not intended for reception by the hearing device, or other properties of the current environment than acoustic);
b) the current acoustic situation (input level, feedback, etc.), and
c) the current mode or state of the user (movement, temperature, cognitive load, etc.);
d) the current mode or state of the hearing device (program selected, time elapsed since last user interaction, etc.) and/or of another device in communication with the hearing device.
The classification unit may be based on or comprise a neural network, e.g. a trained neural network.
The hearing device may comprise an acoustic (and/or mechanical) feedback control (e.g. suppression) or echo-cancelling system. Adaptive feedback cancellation has the ability to track feedback path changes over time. It is typically based on a linear time invariant filter to estimate the feedback path but its filter weights are updated over time. The filter update may be calculated using stochastic gradient algorithms, including some form of the Least Mean Square (LMS) or the Normalized LMS (NLMS) algorithms. They both have the property to minimize the error signal in the mean square sense with the NLMS additionally normalizing the filter update with respect to the squared Euclidean norm of some reference signal.
The hearing aid may further comprise other relevant functionality for the application in question, e.g. compression, noise reduction, active noise control, etc.
The hearing device may e.g. comprise a hearing aid (such as a hearing instrument, e.g. a hearing instrument adapted for being located at the ear or fully or partially in the ear canal of a user), a headset, an earphone, an ear protection device or a combination thereof. The hearing assistance system may comprise a speakerphone (comprising a number of input transducers and a number of output transducers, e.g. for use in an audio conference situation), e.g. comprising a beamformer filtering unit, e.g. providing multiple beamforming capabilities.
Use:
In an aspect, use of a hearing device as described above, in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’ and in the claims, is moreover provided. Use may be provided in a system comprising one or more hearing devices (e.g. hearing instruments), headsets, ear phones, active ear protection systems, etc., e.g. in handsfree telephone systems, teleconferencing systems (e.g. including a speakerphone), public address systems, karaoke systems, classroom amplification systems, etc.
A Method:
In an aspect, a method of operating a hearing device adapted for being worn by a user is furthermore provided by the present application. The method comprises
The method may further comprise
It is intended that some or all of the structural features of the device described above, in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’ or in the claims can be combined with embodiments of the method, when appropriately substituted by a corresponding process and vice versa. Embodiments of the method have the same advantages as the corresponding devices.
A Computer Readable Medium or Data Carrier:
In an aspect, a tangible computer-readable medium (a data carrier) storing a computer program comprising program code means (instructions) for causing a data processing system (a computer) to perform (carry out) at least some (such as a majority or all) of the (steps of the) method described above, in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’ and in the claims, when said computer program is executed on the data processing system is furthermore provided by the present application.
By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. Disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and Blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Other storage media include storage in DNA (e.g. in synthesized DNA strands). Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media. In addition to being stored on a tangible medium, the computer program can also be transmitted via a transmission medium such as a wired or wireless link or a network, e.g. the Internet, and loaded into a data processing system for being executed at a location different from that of the tangible medium.
A Computer Program:
A computer program (product) comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out (steps of) the method described above, in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’ and in the claims is furthermore provided by the present application
A Data Processing System:
In an aspect, a data processing system comprising a processor and program code means for causing the processor to perform at least some (such as a majority or all) of the steps of the method described above, in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’ and in the claims is furthermore provided by the present application.
A Hearing System:
In a further aspect, a hearing system comprising a hearing device as described above, in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’, and in the claims, AND an auxiliary device is moreover provided.
The hearing system may be adapted to establish a communication link between the hearing device and the auxiliary device to provide that information (e.g. control and status signals, possibly audio signals) can be exchanged or forwarded from one to the other.
The auxiliary device may comprise a remote control, a smartphone, or other portable or wearable electronic device, such as a smartwatch or the like.
The auxiliary device may be constituted by or comprise a remote control for controlling functionality and operation of the hearing device(s). The function of a remote control may be implemented in a smartphone, the smartphone possibly running an APP allowing to control the functionality of the audio processing device via the smartphone (the hearing device(s) comprising an appropriate wireless interface to the smartphone, e.g. based on Bluetooth or some other standardized or proprietary scheme).
The auxiliary device may be constituted by or comprise an audio gateway device adapted for receiving a multitude of audio signals (e.g. from an entertainment device, e.g. a TV or a music player, a telephone apparatus, e.g. a mobile telephone or a computer, e.g. a PC) and adapted for selecting and/or combining an appropriate one of the received audio signals (or combination of signals) for transmission to the hearing device.
The auxiliary device may be constituted by or comprise another hearing device. The hearing system may comprise two hearing devices adapted to implement a binaural hearing system, e.g. a binaural hearing aid system.
An APP:
In a further aspect, a non-transitory application, termed an APP, is furthermore provided by the present disclosure. The APP comprises executable instructions configured to be executed on an auxiliary device to implement a user interface for a hearing device or a hearing system described above in the ‘detailed description of embodiments’, and in the claims. The APP may be configured to run on cellular phone, e.g. a smartphone, or on another portable device allowing communication with said hearing device or said hearing system.
In the present context, a hearing aid, e.g. a hearing instrument, refers to a device, which is adapted to improve, augment and/or protect the hearing capability of a user by receiving acoustic signals from the user's surroundings, generating corresponding audio signals, possibly modifying the audio signals and providing the possibly modified audio signals as audible signals to at least one of the user's ears. Such audible signals may e.g. be provided in the form of acoustic signals radiated into the user's outer ears, acoustic signals transferred as mechanical vibrations to the user's inner ears through the bone structure of the user's head and/or through parts of the middle ear as well as electric signals transferred directly or indirectly to the cochlear nerve of the user.
The hearing aid may be configured to be worn in any known way, e.g. as a unit arranged behind the ear with a tube leading radiated acoustic signals into the ear canal or with an output transducer, e.g. a loudspeaker, arranged close to or in the ear canal, as a unit entirely or partly arranged in the pinna and/or in the ear canal, as a unit, e.g. a vibrator, attached to a fixture implanted into the skull bone, as an attachable, or entirely or partly implanted, unit, etc. The hearing aid may comprise a single unit or several units communicating (e.g. acoustically, electrically or optically) with each other. The loudspeaker may be arranged in a housing together with other components of the hearing aid, or may be an external unit in itself (possibly in combination with a flexible guiding element, e.g. a dome-like element).
A hearing aid may be adapted to a particular user's needs, e.g. a hearing impairment. A configurable signal processing circuit of the hearing aid may be adapted to apply a frequency and level dependent compressive amplification of an input signal. A customized frequency and level dependent gain (amplification or compression) may be determined in a fitting process by a fitting system based on a user's hearing data, e.g. an audiogram, using a fitting rationale (e.g. adapted to speech). The frequency and level dependent gain may e.g. be embodied in processing parameters, e.g. uploaded to the hearing aid via an interface to a programming device (fitting system), and used by a processing algorithm executed by the configurable signal processing circuit of the hearing aid.
A ‘hearing system’ refers to a system comprising one or two hearing aids, and a ‘binaural hearing system’ refers to a system comprising two hearing aids and being adapted to cooperatively provide audible signals to both of the user's ears. Hearing systems or binaural hearing systems may further comprise one or more ‘auxiliary devices’, which communicate with the hearing aid(s) and affect and/or benefit from the function of the hearing aid(s). Such auxiliary devices may include at least one of a remote control, a remote microphone, an audio gateway device, an entertainment device, e.g. a music player, a wireless communication device, e.g. a mobile phone (such as a smartphone) or a tablet or another device, e.g. comprising a graphical interface. Hearing aids, hearing systems or binaural hearing systems may e.g. be used for compensating for a hearing-impaired person's loss of hearing capability, augmenting or protecting a normal-hearing person's hearing capability and/or conveying electronic audio signals to a person. Hearing aids or hearing systems may e.g. form part of or interact with public-address systems, active ear protection systems, handsfree telephone systems, car audio systems, entertainment (e.g. TV, music playing or karaoke) systems, teleconferencing systems, classroom amplification systems, etc.
Embodiments of the disclosure may e.g. be useful in applications such as hearing aids, headsets, earpieces (ear buds), etc.
The aspects of the disclosure may be best understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures. The figures are schematic and simplified for clarity, and they just show details to improve the understanding of the claims, while other details are left out. Throughout, the same reference numerals are used for identical or corresponding parts. The individual features of each aspect may each be combined with any or all features of the other aspects. These and other aspects, features and/or technical effect will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the illustrations described hereinafter in which:
The figures are schematic and simplified for clarity, and they just show details which are essential to the understanding of the disclosure, while other details are left out. Throughout, the same reference signs are used for identical or corresponding parts.
Further scope of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the disclosure, are given by way of illustration only. Other embodiments may become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description.
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of various configurations. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of various concepts. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that these concepts may be practiced without these specific details. Several aspects of the apparatus and methods are described by various blocks, functional units, modules, components, circuits, steps, processes, algorithms, etc. (collectively referred to as “elements”). Depending upon particular application, design constraints or other reasons, these elements may be implemented using electronic hardware, computer program, or any combination thereof.
The electronic hardware may include micro-electronic-mechanical systems (MEMS), integrated circuits (e.g. application specific), microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors (DSPs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), gated logic, discrete hardware circuits, printed circuit boards (PCB) (e.g. flexible PCBs), and other suitable hardware configured to perform the various functionality described throughout this disclosure, e.g. sensors, e.g. for sensing and/or registering physical properties of the environment, the device, the user, etc. Computer program shall be construed broadly to mean instructions, instruction sets, code, code segments, program code, programs, subprograms, software modules, applications, software applications, software packages, routines, subroutines, objects, executables, threads of execution, procedures, functions, etc., whether referred to as software, firmware, middleware, microcode, hardware description language, or otherwise.
The present application relates to the field of hearing devices, e.g. hearing aids, headsets, ear buds, etc.
The present disclosure proposes to estimate the probability of speech presence in certain parts, e.g. in disjoint time-frequency regions of an input speech signal s(t), t representing time. The estimated speech presence probabilities (SPPs) from a particular temporal neighborhood are combined into a speech intelligibility index Îm, where m is a time index, that reflects the intelligibility of the signal neighborhood in question, cf.
In the present application, the notation ‘Pk,m’ and ‘P(k,m)’ is used interchangeably for the speech presence probability (depending on indices k, and m, or other indices) without any intended difference in meaning between the two.
By “intelligibility index” we mean a number (scalar) as a function of time that correlates highly with true intelligibility of the speech signal in question as a function of time—as perceived by a group of listeners or a particular individual. In other words, when the true underlying intelligibility is high at a particular point in time, so is Îm, and vice versa. In our proposal, 0≤Îm≤1, where “1” means “high intelligibility”.
In
Various input signals s(t) could be envisaged for the proposed algorithm. In one embodiment, the input signal s(t) to the proposed algorithm could be a microphone signal of the hearing device—in this case, the proposed algorithm provides an estimate Îm of the intelligibility of that microphone signal as a function of time t. In another embodiment, the input to the algorithm consists of several microphone signals used for SPP estimation (see below)—in this case the output Îm of the proposed algorithm typically reflects the intelligibility of one of the microphone signals (decided upon in advance, e.g. a reference microphone signal of a beamformer). In a third embodiment, the input signal s(t) to the proposed algorithm is the output signal of the hearing aid system, i.e., the signal to be presented for the hearing aid user. In this case, Îm reflects the intelligibility experienced by the hearing aid user, when listening to the output signal.
SPP estimation from noisy speech signals is a well-known discipline in the area of single- and multi-microphone speech enhancement (see e.g. [Hoang et al.; 2021] for a recent proposal). Most methods work in a spectral domain, e.g., via a short-time Fourier Transform and provides SPP estimates for each and every time-frequency coefficient. For each time-frequency tile, the estimated probabilities tend towards 0, if there is no speech present, or if there is speech present, but it is dominated by noise, and tend towards 1, if speech is clearly present.
SPP estimation methods can be categorized into the following broad classes:
a) statistical model-based methods (e.g., [Hoang et al.; 2021], Chapter 5) and the references therein), which rely on statistical assumption wrt. speech and noise signals,
b) (deep) learning based methods, e.g., EP3598777A2, in which SPPs are estimated using a data-driven (trained) SPP estimator, and
c) hybrid methods, e.g. where monaural DNN-based SPP estimates are refined using a statistical spatial model or the other way around.
Alternatively, SPP estimation methods can be categorized into algorithms that
a) use a single input signal (see e.g., [Hoang et al.; 2021]) and the references therein, and [Heymann, et al.; 2017].
b) use multiple input signals to estimate SPPs in one of them, e.g., [Heymann, et al.; 2017]).
The speech intelligibility prediction scheme according to the present disclosure is not limited to use SPPs estimated for each coefficient in the time-frequency domain, although this is the domain in which SPP estimation is typically performed in the literature. It is equally possible to envisage schemes where SPPs—for example—are related to coefficients in the spectro-temporal modulation domain. In this case, the signal under analysis may be decomposed using a spectro-temporal modulation filter bank (e.g., as proposed in [Edraki et al.; 2020]), e.g. applied to a linear-amplitude or a log-amplitude spectrogram.
The present disclosure proposes to combine the estimated SPPs from the recent past to form an intelligibility index reflecting the intelligibility of the speech signal across this recent past, i.e.,
Im=ƒ(Pk,m′),k=1, . . . ,K; m′=m-M+1, . . . m,
where Pk,m′ denotes the SPP estimate at the k′th frequency index and m′'th time index, we assume there are K frequency channels and M observations in the recent past, and ƒ(.) denotes a function that maps the SPPs to an intelligibility index, cf.
Alternatively, the intelligibility index Îm reflecting the intelligibility at time instant m is a function of recent past and near future SPPs wrt. the time index m. The parameter M, which defines the time duration upon which Îm is based, is chosen according to the application. Typical values of M correspond to time durations of 100 ms, 200 ms, 500 ms, 1 s, 5 s, 10 s, or more. In some applications, M could correspond to the duration of a speech signal or a set of speech signals.
The simplest form of the function ƒ(.) is to simply form an intelligibility index estimate from an arithmetic average of the SPPs of the recent past.
Another slightly more general approach is to introduce frequency weights
where wk are pre-determined weight factors. Often, we use pre-determined weights that indicate proportionate importance of different frequency bands, i.e., 0≤wk≤1 and Σkwk=1.
In another embodiment, the SPPs are transformed, before they are combined, e.g., using a log-transform, Pk,m:=log(Pk,m+c1), where c1 is a small number to avoid numerical problems in computing log(.) for very low SPPs. Other transformation could be envisaged, e.g., compressive transforms such as square roots, etc.
In yet another embodiment, the SPPs are quantized, before they are combined, e.g. using a 2-level quantizer, Pk,m:=1 if Pk,m>c2 and Pk,m=0 otherwise.
In yet another embodiment, the SPPs Pk,m are passed through a max-pool map, before combined. A max-pool map replaces a given SPP, say Pk,m, by the maximal SPP in its vicinity, e.g., Pk,m:=max Pk′,m′, k′=k−k0, . . . , k′=k+k0, m′=m−m0, . . . , m+m0, see
The rationale of max-pooling of SPPs before combination is to take into account the observation that time-frequency tiles with high SPPs tend to convey more intelligibility if they are spread across the time-frequency plane, than if they are clustered. This is so, because in the former case, they are likely to be related to different formant frequencies, and, hence, be more informative, whereas in the latter case, they are likely to be related to the same formant frequency.
In the examples above (potentially non-linearly transformed) SPPs are combined by addition. Obviously, other ways of combining SPPs exist, e.g., multiplication, etc.
In a final embodiment, the mapping function ƒ(.) is a data-driven model, learned from training data. In particular, ƒ(.) could be a deep neural network whose parameters could be learned offline—before actual system deployment—using training data consisting of estimated SPPs Pk,m′, k=1, . . . , K; m′=m−M+1, . . . m, for a particular noise/processed segment of a speech signal (i.e., input to the data-driven model ƒ(.)) along with ground truth speech intelligibility of that speech segment, as measured in listening tests with human test subjects, i.e., desired output of the data-driven model ƒ(.). Details of the approach for training deep neural networks for intelligibility prediction is described in [Pedersen et al.; 2020], but this work differs from the proposed approach, because it does not rely on SPPs and assumes access to a noise-free reference signal.
The procedure for deriving an intelligibility index described so far has not taken into account any potential hearing deficits of the device user. This may not be a problem, if the intelligibility index is simply used to decide if an algorithm setting (A) leads to higher intelligibility than another setting (B). However, in general, it could be useful to incorporate the effect of a hearing loss in the intelligibility prediction algorithm. Several options exist for incorporating prior knowledge of such hearing deficits.
For example, for the statistical model based SPP estimation methods mentioned above, the hearing loss may be modelled crudely as an imaginary additive noise term—spectrally (and potentially temporally) shaped according to the hearing loss profile in question—and added to the acoustic noisy signal in question for deriving mathematically the SPPs. The derived SPPs will generally be reduced due to the presence of the imaginary noise term, reflecting the fact that certain speech cues will be harder to detect for the hearing impaired end user.
Similarly, for the learning based SPP estimation methods described above, the noise signal simulating the hearing loss is simply physically added to the noisy signals during training of the SPP estimation algorithm. As for the statistical model based SPP estimation methods, the output SPP estimates of the learning based algorithms will generally be reduced due to the presence of the additional “hearing loss” noise.
As indicated, other ‘input stage’ configurations than shown on
The training setup comprises a context unit (CONTEXT) for providing an appropriate input vector Z(k,m) to the neural network (DNN (SPP-SI)) to be trained. The context (cf. hatched part of time-frequency map denoted ‘Context’ in the top part of
The training data comprises a larger number of words or numbers or sentences (e.g. hundreds or thousands, but ideally many more (e.g. as many as possible)), e.g. spoken by a number of different speakers' (e.g. at different signal-to-noise ratios, using different noise types, etc.) and associated (e.g. average) speech intelligibility measures (e.g. provided by different listeners), e.g. provided by listening tests or by an algorithm having been trained with data from listening tests, cf. e.g. EP3514792A1.
A noisy time domain training signal (x(n)) is passed through an analysis filter bank (FBA), providing frequency sub-band (time-frequency domain) signals X(k m). For a particular time instant m′, noisy signals representing a particular time segment of test data (e.g. a word, sentences, etc.) are passed through Speech Presence Probability estimation unit (SPPE) providing speech presence probability estimates P(k,m′) for each frequency index k=1, . . . , K.
The SPPE-unit provides speech presence probability estimates P(k,m) for each time-frequency tile (k,m) to the context unit (CONTEXT) to build a desired input vector Z(k,m). to the neural network (DNN (SPP-SI)) to be trained. For a given time instant m=m′, the estimated value Î(m′), of the speech intelligibility measure is estimated by the neural network using present and past values of the speech presence probability estimate, P(k, m), k=1, . . . , K; m=m′−L+1, . . . , m′, where L denotes the number of past frames used to estimate I(m′). The number L of frames represents the ‘history’ of the SPP estimates that is included in the estimation of speech intelligibility measure. With a view to the general nature of speech, the ‘history’ (L) may e.g. include up to 10 s of the input signal (SPP estimates), e.g. representing a few sentences.
The input vector Z(k,m) to the neural network may thus comprise a number of time frequency values of the speech presence probability P(k,m), k=1, . . . , K; m=m′−L+1, . . . , m′, (e.g. real numbers between 0 and 1) as illustrated by the top time-frequency (TF) map in
SPP input vectors Z(k, m′) for given time instants m=m′, e.g., comprising speech presence probability estimates P(k, m), k=1, . . . , K; m=m′−L+1, . . . , m′, corresponding to a word or one or more sentences, as appropriate, and corresponding ground truth speech intelligibility values I(m′) for said word or one or more sentences, are used to train the (e.g. deep) neural network (DNN (SPP-SI)). Using the neural network, we wish to provide an estimate I(m′), ‘now’ (=m′) (corresponding to the current word(s) or sentence(s), if any, present in the input data) based on L observations (L time frames) up to (and including) time ‘now’ (see e.g. time-frequency map insert in the top part of
The mapping unit may represent a Fourier transformation or any other transform process for transformation from one domain to another domain (e.g. a Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) or the Karhunen Loéve Transform (KLT), a Temporal transformation, a Spectro-Temporal modulation, etc.). An inverse mapping unit (or another (possibly different) mapping unit) may be applied in the hearing aid at any appropriate location appropriate for the design in question to bring the signal in question to a domain (e.g. time-frequency domain or time domain) as suitable for the specific solution. As indicated in
In the embodiment of
The hearing aid further comprises an analysis path, here comprising a speech intelligibility estimator (SIE) according to the present disclosure. The speech intelligibility estimator (SIE) provides an estimate of speech intelligibility Î of a given electric input signal of the forward path, here shown as time domain signal xi(n) from microphone MI. The analysis path further comprises a control unit (CTR)(e.g. a controller) configured to provide appropriate parameters for use in the signal processing of the forward path in dependence of the current estimate of speech intelligibility Î. In the embodiment of
Other signals of the forward than the time domain electric input signal (xi(n)) may alternatively or additionally be provided with an analysis path comprising a comprising a speech intelligibility estimator (SIE) according to the present disclosure. This may e.g. be one or more of the time-frequency domain signals Xi(k,m), the beamformed signal YBF(km), or the processed signal (either in time-frequency domain YG(km) or in time domain yG(n), or any intermediate signal of the forward path, e.g. depending on the applied processing algorithms).
It is intended that the structural features of the devices described above, either in the detailed description and/or in the claims, may be combined with steps of the method, when appropriately substituted by a corresponding process.
As used, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well (i.e. to have the meaning “at least one”), unless expressly stated otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “comprises,” “including,” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element, but an intervening element may also be present, unless expressly stated otherwise. Furthermore, “connected” or “coupled” as used herein may include wirelessly connected or coupled. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The steps of any disclosed method are not limited to the exact order stated herein, unless expressly stated otherwise.
It should be appreciated that reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” or “an aspect” or features included as “may” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined as suitable in one or more embodiments of the disclosure. The previous description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the various aspects described herein. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other aspects.
The claims are not intended to be limited to the aspects shown herein but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with the language of the claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” Unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “some” refers to one or more.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21179577 | Jun 2021 | EP | regional |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170272870 | Andersen | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3 057 335 | Aug 2016 | EP |
| 3 203 473 | Aug 2017 | EP |
| 3 220 661 | Sep 2017 | EP |
| 3 514 792 | Jul 2019 | EP |
| 3 598 777 | Jan 2020 | EP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Baumgärtel et al., “Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies I: Instrumental Evaluation”, Trends in Hearing, vol. 19, 2015, pp. 1-16. |
| Extended European Search Report issued in Application No. 21179577.8, dated Dec. 7, 2021. |
| Hoang et al., “Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Power Spectral Densities and Relative Acoustic Transfer Functions for Acoustic Beamforming”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2021, pp. 6119-6123. |
| Jensen et al., “An Algorithm for Predicting the Intelligibility of Speech Masked by Modulated Noise Maskers”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 24. No. 11, 2016, pp. 2009-2022. |
| Martín-Doñas et al., “Online Multichannel Speech Enhancement Based on Recursive EM and DNN-Based Speech Presence Estimation”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 28, 2020, pp. 3080-3094. |
| Edraki et al., “Speech Intelligibility Prediction Using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 29, 2021, pp. 210-225. |
| Heymann et al., “A Generic Neural Acoustic Beamforming Architecture for Robust Multi-Channel Speech Processing”, Computer Speech and Language, Oct. 12, 2016, pp. 1-20. |
| Pedersen et al., “A Neural Network for Monaural Intrusive Speech Intelligibility Prediction”, ICASSP, May 2020, pp. 336-340. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220400349 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |
