This application claims the benefit of European Patent Application Serial No. 17181173.0, filed Jul. 13, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a hearing device comprising a vibration preventing arrangement in order to allow a higher stable gain between a microphone inlet and a receiver output. The hearing device is adapted to be positioned within the ear canal of a user.
Receiver in the canal (MC) and Microphone and Receiver in the canal (MRIC) are known design approaches within the hearing aid community. A MC may be implemented as a hearing device where the microphone is positioned behind the ear, whereas an MRIC has the microphone positioned in the ear canal. RICs and MRICs may be implemented with either a closed dome or an open dome.
As in particular the MRIC is a very compact device the achievable stable gain is limited by the feedback signal, i.e. the amount of signal being picked up by the microphone (generated by the MRIC itself), divided by the sound pressure in the ear canal. Thus, the higher the feedback, the lower the stable gain between microphone input and receiver output.
Thus, there seems to be a need for providing an arrangement that allows a higher stable gain in for example RICs and MRICs.
It may be seen as an object of embodiments of the present invention to provide an appropriate arrangement for reducing feedback within a hearing device.
It may be seen as a further object of embodiments of the present invention to provide an appropriate arrangement that allows a higher stable gain between a microphone inlet and a receiver outlet of a hearing device, such as an MMC.
The above-mentioned objects are complied with by providing, in a first aspect, a hearing device adapted to be positioned in an ear canal of a user, the hearing device comprising,
a receiver unit,
a positioning member adapted to position and hold the hearing device in the ear canal of a user, and
a vibration preventing arrangement adapted to prevent vibrations of a least part of the positioning member.
Thus, the first aspect of the present invention relates to the hearing device adapted to the inserted in the ear canal of the used. The hearing device may be of the type microphone and receiver in the canal (MRIC).
The term “positioning member” is to be understood as any member being capable of positioning and holding the hearing device in a correct position within the ear canal of the user. A correct position of the hearing device may be a position where the acoustical performance of the hearing device is optimized. In addition, the “positioning member” may ensure that the hearing device may be carried with great comfort over long periods of time.
The term “vibration preventing arrangement” is to be understood as any arrangement being capable preventing that receiver generated vibrations are transferred to the positioning member. Thus, the “vibration preventing arrangement” prevents that at least part of the positioning member vibrates whereby feedback signals to a microphone unit may be avoided. As disclosed in details below the “vibration preventing arrangement” may be implemented as a vibration isolation arrangement or an arrangement that provides stiffness to at least part of the positioning member.
The receiver unit may be adapted to operate in an audible range, such as in the range 0-20 kHz, such as in the range 10 Hz-18 kHz.
The effect of the vibration preventing arrangement may generally result in a vibration reduction gain within the range 5-20 dB, such as within the range 10-15 dB, within the frequency range 100 Hz-8 kHz.
In general, the hearing device may further comprise one or more additional transducers, such as one or more additional receiver units and/or one or more additional microphone units, said one or more additional transducers being integrated with and/or associated with the hearing device. In case of being integrated with the hearing device the one or more additional transducers may be positioned within the same hearing device housing as the receiver unit. In case of being associated with the hearing device the one or more transducers may be positioned outside a hearing device housing comprising the receiver unit. It should be noted that other types of transducers/sensors may be included as well.
The hearing device may in particular comprise a microphone unit being either integrated with the hearing device or being associated therewith. In case of being integrated with the hearing device the microphone unit may be positioned within the same hearing device housing as the receiver unit. In case of being associated with the hearing device the microphone unit may be positioned outside a hearing device housing comprising the receiver unit.
In a first embodiment the vibration preventing arrangement may comprise a vibration isolation arrangement adapted to vibration isolate at least part of the positioning member from the receiver unit. Thus, the vibration isolation arrangement may be arranged at a position between the receiver unit and a part of the positioning member that is not allowed to vibrate in response to receiver generated vibrations. The vibration isolation arrangement may form a suspension member between the receiver unit and at least part of the positioning member. In order to provide appropriate vibration isolation properties the suspension member may be more compliant than the positioning member. The higher compliance of the suspension member may be achieved by using a softer material or by shaping, such as thinning, the material defining the suspension member. The vibration isolation arrangement and the positioning member may form a single and integral member of the same material, such as rubber or silicone. Moreover, a stem forming an integral part of the single integral member may be provided. The stem may be adapted to be secured to a spout/nozzle of the hearing device or the receiver unit. In terms of manufacturing the vibration isolation arrangement and the positioning member may be manufacturing using a suitable injection moulding technique
As an alternative to the above-mentioned integral solution the vibration preventing arrangement may comprise a discrete member adapted to vibration isolate at least part of the positioning member from the receiver unit. Similar to the integrated solution the discrete member may be more compliant than the positioning member. This may be achieved by manufacturing the discrete member in a soft material, such as rubber or silicone.
Similar to the integrated solution a stem adapted to be secured to a spout/nozzle of the hearing device or the receiver unit may be provided. In this implementation the discrete member may be secured to the positioning member and the stem via respective engaging members and recesses. The positioning member may be made of a first material, the stem may be made of a second material, whereas the discrete member may be made of a third material. The first and second materials may be the same material, whereas the third material may be a softer material. The first, second and/or third materials may all be rubber or silicone materials although the third material may be a softer compound that the first and second materials.
In a second embodiment the vibration preventing arrangement may comprise thickness variations, such as angular and/or radial thickness variations, of at least part of the positioning member in order to make selected portions of the positioning member stiffer. Thus, according to this embodiment selected portions of the positioning member is/are made stiffer via thickness variations whereby the overall system comprising the MRIC and the positioning member becomes less sensitive to receiver generated vibrations.
In case of angular thickness variations the vibration preventing arrangement may comprise a number of essentially concentrically arranged rings secured to or integrated with the positioning member. In case of radial thickness variations the vibration preventing arrangement may comprise a number of radially arranged ribs secured to or integrated with the positioning member. Moreover, a number of spirals secured to or integrated with the positioning member may be provided in order to provide desired thickness variations. The number of rings, spirals and/or ribs as well as the position thereof may be tailored to meet certain demands. The number of rings, spirals and/or ribs may vary from 1 to 15, or even more, and the rings and/or ribs may be evenly or unevenly distributed on a concave or a convex surface of the positioning member. Moreover, the cross-sectional profiles of the rings, spirals and/or ribs may be identical or different.
The second embodiment may further comprise a stem adapted to be secured to a spout/nozzle of the hearing device or a receiver unit of the hearing device. The positioning member, the vibration preventing arrangement in the form of thickness variations and the stem may form a single and integral member of the same material, such as rubber or silicon.
In general, at least part of the positioning member may take the form of a dome-shaped element, i.e. a dome umbrella.
In a second aspect the present invention relates to a hearing device adapted to be positioned in an ear canal of a user, the hearing device comprising,
a receiver unit, and
an positioning member adapted to position and hold the hearing device in the ear canal of a user,
wherein the receiver unit is moveably arranged relative to the positioning member so that receiver unit induced vibrations are essentially not transferred to the positioning member.
Thus, according to the second aspect the receiver unit may be allowed to move or slide relative to the positioning member and/or a stem secured to or integrated with the positioning member whereby receiver generated vibrations are not transferred to the positioning member.
In order to control the relative movements between the receiver unit and a stem a number of inwardly directed proj ections integrated therewith and/or attached to the stem may be provided. A number of mechanical stop members may limit the movements of the projections, and thereby the stem, relative to a spout/nozzle secured to the receiver unit. In this manner the relative movements between the spout/nozzle and the stem may be fully controlled.
The positioning member of the first and second aspects may comprise a tuned venting opening. The tuned venting opening may be in the form of a through-going opening in the positioning member. A tuned venting opening is advantageous in that it may be used to offer customers non-occluded hearing devices, such as RICs and/or MRICs, while the vibration preventing arrangement reduces the sound production of the positioning member in the frequency range where the dome is blocking/damping the sound coming from inside the ear canal.
It may be desirable to reduce the movable area of the positioning member in that this will also reduce the vibrations of the positioning member and thereby a potential feedback to a microphone. The moveable area of the positioning member of the first and second aspects may be reduced using an arrangement, such as a substantially stiff rim secured to a housing of the hearing device. The substantially stiff rim may either be inserted between the positioning member and the housing of the hearing device, or it may mechanically support a portion of the positioning member, such as the portion being closest to the housing of the hearing device. Both implementations will effectively reduce the moveable area of the positioning member and thereby a potential feedback to a microphone of the hearing device.
The present invention will now be described in further details with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms specific embodiments have been shown by way of examples in the drawings and will be described in details herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
In its broadest aspect the present invention relates to a hearing device comprising a vibration preventing arrangement for reducing feedback between a receiver and a microphone of the hearing device. The vibration preventing arrangement is thus adapted to prevent that vibrations generated by the receiver of the hearing device reach the microphone of the same hearing device or a microphone associated therewith. The vibration preventing arrangement of the present invention allows for a higher stable gain between the microphone inlet and the receiver output.
The principle of the present invention is applicable to all types of hearing devices where a stable and high gain between a microphone inlet and a receiver output is desired. However, due the compact design of for example an MRIC the principle of the present invention is of particular relevance in connection with such designs.
Upon activation of the receiver 103 the MRIC 100 may vibrate as illustrated by the arrow 108. The vibrations induced by the receiver 103 are transferred to the dome-shaped element 105 as indicated by the arrows 106, 107. It should be noted that the direction of vibration may be different from what is depicted in
As the MRIC 100 is intended for being positioning in the ear canal of the user the vibrations 106, 107 of the dome-shaped element 105 may generate an undesirable feedback signal in the form of pressure variations to the microphone 102 of the MRIC 100—said undesirable feedback signal setting a limit to an achievable gain between the microphone 102 and the receiver 103. Thus, the undesirable feedback signal should be avoided or reduced to a minimum in order to obtain a stable as well as a high gain between the microphone 102 and the receiver 103 of the MRIC 100. The embodiments shown in
The high compliant elements 204, 203 are adapted for providing vibration isolation in the transverse direction of the MRIC housing 201 as illustrated by the linear arrow. It should be noted that vibration isolation may be provided in other directions than the longitudinal direction. In fact the implementation of the high compliant elements 204, 203 may be tailored to provide vibration isolation in a predetermined direction or directions.
Referring now to the MRIC 206 shown in
The MRIC 212 shown in
In
With reference to
Referring now to
In the right figure in
It should be noted that the use of concentrically arranged rings and radially oriented ribs may be combined in order to tailor the mechanical and thereby structural properties of the dome-shaped element.
Turning now to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17181173 | Jul 2017 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3048668 | Weiss | Aug 1962 | A |
6129174 | Brown | Oct 2000 | A |
6788796 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6831577 | Furst | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6853290 | Jorgensen | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859542 | Johannsen | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888408 | Furst | May 2005 | B2 |
6914992 | van Halteren | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6919519 | Ravnkilde | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930259 | Jorgensen | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6943308 | Ravnkilde | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6974921 | Jorgensen | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008271 | Jorgensen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012200 | Moller | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7062058 | Steeman | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062063 | Hansen | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072482 | Van Doorn | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088839 | Geschiere | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110560 | Stenberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7136496 | van Halteren | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142682 | Mullenborn | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7181035 | van Halteren | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190803 | van Halteren | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206428 | Geschiere | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221767 | Mullenborn | May 2007 | B2 |
7221769 | Jorgensen | May 2007 | B1 |
7227968 | van Halteren | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239714 | de Blok | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245734 | Niederdraenk | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254248 | Johannsen | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7286680 | Steeman | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292700 | Engbert | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7292876 | Bosh | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7336794 | Furst | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7376240 | Hansen | May 2008 | B2 |
7403630 | Jorgensen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415121 | Mögelin | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425196 | Jorgensen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7460681 | Geschiere | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466835 | Stenberg | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7492919 | Engbert | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7548626 | Stenberg | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7657048 | van Halteren | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7684575 | van Halteren | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706561 | Wilmink | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715583 | Van Halteren | May 2010 | B2 |
7728237 | Pedersen | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7809151 | Van Halteren | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822218 | Van Halteren | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7899203 | Van Halteren | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912240 | Madaffari | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946890 | Bondo | May 2011 | B1 |
7953241 | Jorgensen | May 2011 | B2 |
7961899 | Van Halteren | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970161 | van Halteren | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8098854 | van Halteren | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101876 | Andreasen | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103039 | van Halteren | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8160290 | Jorgensen | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170249 | Halteren | May 2012 | B2 |
8189804 | Hruza | May 2012 | B2 |
8189820 | Wang | May 2012 | B2 |
8223996 | Beekman | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233652 | Jorgensen | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8259963 | Stenberg | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8259976 | van Halteren | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8259977 | Jorgensen | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280082 | van Halteren | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284966 | Wilk | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8313336 | Bondo | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315422 | van Halteren | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331595 | van Halteren | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8369552 | Engbert | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8379899 | van Halteren | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8509468 | van Halteren | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526651 | Lafort | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8526652 | Ambrose | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20070036379 | Anderson | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070071265 | Leedom | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20100061580 | Tiscareno | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110182453 | van Hal | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110189880 | Bondo | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110299708 | Bondo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299712 | Bondo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311069 | Ambrose | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014548 | van Halteren | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027245 | van Halteren | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120140966 | Mocking | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155683 | van Halteren | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155694 | Reeuwijk | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120255805 | van Halteren | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130028451 | de Roo | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130136284 | van Hal | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142370 | Engbert | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163799 | van Halteren | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130195295 | van Halteren | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130279732 | Sanecki | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140355809 | Killion | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160192058 | Kelly | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20180020302 | Rasmussen | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2624592 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2753102 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2753102 | Jul 2014 | EP |
WO 0069216 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0069216 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 17181173.0, dated Jan. 19, 2018 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190020958 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |