Examples described herein relate to hearing devices, and more particularly methods and systems for performing a calibration process (e.g., a calibration check or a self-calibration) of a hearing device using a built-in calibration system of a hearing device test system.
The performance of a hearing aid may change over time due to degradation of components over time. A consumer may wish to ensure that their hearing aid is operating properly to optimize their hearing experience. Performance and calibration checks for hearing aids are typically performed by professionals using specialized test instruments, such as a hearing aid analyzer. These specialized test instruments are cumbersome due to size, cost, and nuances unneeded in the consumer environment. These nuances are not of interest to a consumer who merely wants a quick check to know if their hearing aid is properly operating within a specification. Hearing aid analyzers or calibration checkers for home use have been developed. However, these systems typically suffer from similar issues related to size, cost, and complexity and may not be generally suitable for administration by a hearing aid consumer in home settings.
Further, conventional hearing aid analyzers typically include costly components for performing an array of tests and scientific measurements well beyond the needs of a consumer for verifying the basic function of a hearing aid. For example, to maintain a high level of acoustic isolation, large insulated boxes are required leading to high manufacturing costs. In another example a standardized size acoustic cavity (known as acoustic couplers) is also used which adds considerable space and cost requirements. The combined cost of a typical hearing aid analyzer can easily exceed $3,000.
A hearing device test system according to examples disclosed herein may include a hearing device, a portable test unit, and a processor. The hearing device may include a sound processor, a speaker, and a microphone.
The portable test unit may include a test microphone acoustically coupled to an exterior of the portable test unit via an acoustic calibration cavity. The acoustic calibration cavity may be defined by an acoustic chamber. The acoustic calibration cavity may be acoustically coupled to an exterior of the portable test unit. The test microphone may be configured to produce a calibration signal input responsive to acoustic calibration stimuli provided by the speaker. The portable test unit may include a coupler at an opening to the acoustic calibration cavity. The coupler may be configured to receive the hearing device or an acoustic adapter at least partially therein.
The processor may be associated with the hearing device test system. The processor may be incorporated within any of the portable test unit, computing device, or the hearing device. The processor may be configured to measure a level of the calibration signal input. The processor may be configured to validate the calibration of the hearing device. The processor may be configured to validate the calibration using a calibration data stored in any of a remote server, a client computer, the hearing device, and the portable test unit. The processor may be configured to validate the calibration by comparing a level of the calibration signal with a reference calibration level. The calibration may be confirmed if the level of the calibration signal input is within a range of reference levels.
In some examples, the hearing device test system may further include an acoustic adapter. The acoustic adapter may be configured for coupling a hearing device to the portable test unit. The acoustic adapter may include a first portion defining an opening configured to receive the different hearing device and a second portion comprising another opening configured to acoustically couple the hearing device to the acoustic calibration cavity.
The above and still further objectives, features, aspects and attendant advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of certain preferred and alternate embodiments and method of manufacture and use thereof, including the best mode presently contemplated of practicing the invention, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Certain details are set forth below to provide a sufficient understanding of embodiments of the invention. Some embodiments, however, may not include all details described. In some instances, well known structures may not be shown in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the described embodiments of the invention.
The present disclosure describes hearing device test systems and methods for checking a calibration of a hearing device test system or components thereof. A hearing device test system according to the present disclosure includes a portable test unit with a built-in calibration cavity. The hearing device test system may be particularly suitable for personal use, for example for use by a non-expert user outside the clinical environment. A hearing device test system according to some examples disclosed herein may mitigate the need for calibration check or calibration of a hearing device by a hearing professional or a service technician. Hearing device test systems as described herein may empower consumers to automatically check the performance and calibration of their hearing device at home, or generally non-clinical settings such as an office, a nursing home, a drug store, a pharmacy, etc. without resorting to cumbersome and costly instrumentation available in clinical settings. In some examples, a calibration of the hearing device may be checked automatically without resorting to sending some or all components of the hearing device test system (e.g., a hearing device) to the manufacturer or a service center for calibration or calibration check. In some examples, a programming of the hearing device may be automatically adjusted to recalibrate the hearing device after a calibration check.
The hearing device 20 may be a hearing aid (BTE, CIC, or any other type), a personal sound amplification product (PSAP), or any other type of sound delivery device that may be worn by a consumer (e.g., user 75). The hearing device 20 may include a sound processor 23, a speaker 21 and a microphone 16. During typical use, the microphone 16 may detect acoustic inputs (e.g., ambient sounds) and transmit sound inputs to the sound processor 23, which may process (e.g., amplify) the sound inputs before transmission to the speaker 21 for delivery to the consumer. The sound inputs may be converted from analog to digital (e.g., using an A/D converter) before transmission to the sound processor 23 and then again from digital to analog (e.g., using a D/A converter) before transmission to the speaker 21. In some examples, the hearing device 20 may be modular (e.g., as shown in
The portable test unit 10 may be handheld or wearable. In some examples, a length of the portable test unit 10 may be less than 8 inches, less than 7 inches, less than 6 inches, less than 5 inches, or less than 4 inches. In some examples, the portable test unit 10 may be about 3 inches to about 6 inches long. In some examples, a width of the portable test unit 10 may be less than 5 inches, less than 4 inches, less than 2 inches, or less than 1 inch. In some examples, the portable test unit 10 may weigh less than 2 ounces. The portable test unit 10 may include electronic components enclosed, at least partially, by a housing 4. For example, the portable test unit 10 may include one or more circuit boards (e.g., circuit board 27) which may connect electronic components such as a microphone (e.g., test microphone 7), a processor (e.g., audio processing electronics 8, a processor 18 which may be programmed to perform functions described herein, or a combination of the two), input/output devices (e.g., an audio input/output device such as an audio jack 28, a USB port, or other types of ports of connectors 2), communication devices (e.g., Bluetooth or Wi-Fi enabled communication devices), and memory. The portable test unit 10 may include a wired or wireless programming interface 50 for programming the hearing device 20. In some examples, the programming interface 50 may be a wireless interface implemented in the form of a Bluetooth interface configured to communicatively couple the portable test unit 10 with the hearing device 20. In some examples, a wired audio interface 52 may provide functionality associated with the programming interface 50.
The portable test unit 10 may include an acoustic chamber 33 defining an acoustic calibration cavity 3. The acoustic calibration cavity 3 may be acoustically coupled to an exterior of the portable test unit 10 via an opening 13 provided in the housing 4. A test microphone 7 may be acoustically coupled to the exterior of the portable test unit 10 via the acoustic calibration cavity 3. For example, a sensor of the test microphone 7 may be provided within the acoustic calibration cavity 3 or along a wall of the acoustic calibration cavity 3 (see e.g.,
In some examples, the acoustic calibration cavity 3 may be configured to accommodate the hearing device 20 at least partially therein (e.g., as shown in
In some examples, the hearing device test system 100 may include a computing device 30, such as a personal computer, a smartphone, or a tablet. The portable test unit 10 may be communicatively coupled to the computing device 30. In some examples, the portable test unit 10 may be communicatively coupled to the computing device 30 using a wired or a wireless connection. For example, the computing device 30 may be coupled to the portable test unit 10 using a wired connection, such as USB connection. In some examples, the computing device 30 may be coupled to the portable test unit 10 using a wireless connection, such as Bluetooth. The wired or wireless connection may serve as a programming interface 50 or an audio interface 52 between the hearing device 20, portable test unit 10 and/or the computing device 30. In some examples, the wired or wireless connection between the computing device 30 and the portable test unit 10 may enable programming of the hearing device 20 when coupled to the portable test unit 10.
The computing device may include a processor (CPU) 41 which may be configured to execute a standalone calibration test application (e.g., software application 47). In some examples, the calibration test application may be a web-based application. The computing device 30 may include memory 44 which may store processor-executable instructions 45, which may program the processor 41 to execute the software application 47. The processor-executable instructions 45 may include instructions for performing a calibration check or a self-calibration using the portable test unit 10. In some examples, the computing device 30 may store or relay calibration data (e.g., reference calibration data 46) for performing the calibration check and/or the self-calibration. The term calibration check may refer to a process for verifying that the hearing device 20 is within a reference calibration range with a pass/fail result. The term self-calibration may refer to a process for determining whether the hearing device 20 is within the reference calibration range, and adjusting calibration data of the hearing device 20 to recalibrate the hearing device 20 if the hearing device 20 is determined to be outside the reference calibration range. The calibration data of the hearing device 20 may be stored in memory of the hearing device 20 (e.g., memory 63) and may be used by the hearing device 20 to produce an audible output based on an input signal. For example, an input signal may be generated by the microphone 16 of the hearing device 20 in response to detecting an audible input (e.g., ambient sound). The input signal from the microphone 16 may be processed (e.g., amplified) by the sound processor 23 to produce an output at the speaker 21, as previously described, which may include adjusting the output in accordance with the calibration data of the hearing device 20.
The portable test unit 10 includes an acoustic calibration cavity 3 for receiving acoustic calibration stimuli 5 from the hearing device 20. The acoustic calibration cavity 3 may be configured for coupling the hearing device 20 therewith, for example by inserting at least a portion of the hearing device 20 within an opening of the calibration cavity 3 (e.g., an inlet of calibration cavity 3). In some examples, during a calibration check or a self-calibration, the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 may be positioned within the acoustic calibration cavity 3. During the calibration check or self-calibration, the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 may be oriented toward a test microphone 7 within the calibration cavity of the portable test unit 10. The test microphone 7 may also measure ambient sounds during a hearing test. The test microphone 7 of the portable test unit 10 may be provided within the acoustic calibration cavity 3 for receiving the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 during a calibration check or a self-calibration function. In some examples, the test microphone 7 may be provided at a bottom of the acoustic calibration cavity 3. During a calibration check or a self-calibration, the test microphone 7 may produce a calibration signal input in response to acoustic calibration stimuli 5 generated by the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20. The test microphone 7 may transmit the calibration signal input to an audio processing electronics 8 (APE) of the portable test unit 10.
In some examples, a removable ear sealing retainer (not shown) of the hearing device 20 is removed from the hearing device 20 prior to inserting the hearing device 20 into the acoustic calibration cavity 3. When the hearing device 20 is accommodated within the acoustic calibration cavity 3, the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 may transmit an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 to the acoustic calibration cavity 3. In some examples, the portable test unit 10 may include a speaker within the acoustic calibration cavity 3 for delivering an acoustic calibration stimuli for receiving by the hearing device microphone 16. The acoustic calibration cavity 3 may be configured with a controlled acoustic volume to produce a predetermined sound pressure level according to the acoustic calibration stimuli 5. In some examples, the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 and the test microphone 7 of the portable test unit 10 may be oriented to face each other when the hearing device 20 is placed within the acoustic calibration cavity 3. The test microphone 7 may alternatively be positioned indirectly or sideways with respect to the speaker of the hearing device 20. In some examples, the acoustic calibration cavity 3 may include a locking mechanism for secure attachment of the hearing device 20 when placed within. The acoustic calibration cavity 3 provides a controlled acoustic transfer function for the hearing device 20 when inserted therein.
Referring now further to
In some examples, the acoustic adapter 6 may include a microphone calibration vent 9 to deliver test sound from the acoustic calibration cavity 3 back to the microphone 16 of the hearing device 20. Delivery of test acoustic signals from the acoustic cavity to the microphone 16 of the hearing device 20 may provide a closed-loop system whereby an acoustic output 5 from the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 may be received by the microphone 16 of the hearing device 20 via a microphone port 22 (
In some examples, the microphone calibration vent 9 may be incorporated within a housing of the acoustic calibration cavity 3, or the acoustic adapter 6. The microphone port 22 may be provided on the lateral end of the hearing device 20 to receive acoustic calibration stimuli. The acoustic calibration stimuli may include acoustic calibration stimuli 5 generated by the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 or a different acoustic calibration stimuli generated by a speaker incorporated within the acoustic calibration cavity 3 of the portable test unit 10. In some examples, the acoustic adapter 6 may be formed to provide the calibration vent opening 19 in alignment with the microphone port 22 of the hearing device 20. In some examples, the microphone vent opening 19 may be provided at a predefined orientation and distance from the microphone port 22 of the hearing device 20 to provide a predetermined acoustic transfer function, for example a predefined acoustic loss. The predefined acoustic characteristics may be accounted for during calibration check or calibration of the hearing device 20.
In some examples, the acoustic adapter 6 may include multiple microphone calibration vents so as to allow the hearing device 20 to be inserted into the acoustic adapter 6 in multiple orientations. In some examples, two or more microphone calibration vents may be provided.
In some examples, a test pod 25 may house a test speaker (not shown) for transmitting a calibration acoustic signal to the microphone 16 of the hearing device 20. The test pod 25 may be shaped to couple to the hearing device 20. The microphone 16 of the hearing device 20 may produce an input signal in response to the calibration acoustic signal from the test pod 25. The microphone 16 may deliver the input signal to the sound processor 23 of the hearing device 20 and ultimately producing acoustic calibration stimuli 5 from the speaker 21 based on the input calibration acoustic signal. The test pod 25 may be coupled to the computing device 30 or the portable test unit 10 via a wired or wireless interface.
In some examples, the hearing device 20 may include a calibration signal generator 24 for producing acoustic calibration stimuli 5 from the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20, as shown in
In some examples, the calibration of the hearing device 20 may be validated by coupling the hearing device 20 to the acoustic calibration cavity 3, as described above. When the hearing device 20 is inserted into the acoustic calibration cavity 3, the portable test unit 10 or the computing device 30 may transmit a command to the hearing device 20 to produce acoustic calibration stimuli 5. The acoustic pressure produced in the acoustic calibration cavity 3 may be sensed by the test microphone 7 of the portable test unit 10, which may transmit a calibration signal input to the audio processing electronics 8 and/or a processor (e.g., processor 18 of the portable test unit 10, or processor 41 of computing device 30), to validate the calibration of the hearing device 20. In some examples, the calibration data may be automatically adjusted according to the measured response and the analysis of the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 produced within the calibration cavity 3. In some examples, the audio processing electronics 8 may be integrated into a single integrated circuit (IC) which includes the functionality of a CPU, an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter, and a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter.
The calibration data may be adjusted to correct for a difference between an acoustic level generated by the hearing device 20 in response to a calibration signal input and a reference level. The calibration data may be stored in memory within the hearing device 20, portable test unit 10 (e.g., production calibration data 29) or in the memory of an external device, for example the computing device 30 or a remote database 71. The calibration data may include reference data produced initially at the factory. The audio processing electronics 8 may be in communication with I/O circuitry, for example a wireless bus or a USB bus. The audio processing electronics 8 may receive a calibration signal input produced by the test microphone 7. The calibration signal input produced by the test microphone 7 may be in response to receiving acoustic calibration stimuli 5 produced by the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 when placed within the calibration cavity. In some examples, the portable test unit 10 including the calibration cavity 3 may be configured to perform a home calibration check for either a hearing test earphone or for a hearing device 20, or for both.
The audio processing electronics 8 may be in communication with a processor 41 of a computing device 30 (for example, a personal computer) to measure a level of the calibration signal input, representative of the level of acoustic calibration stimuli 5 produced in the calibration cavity 3. The processor 41 may validate the calibration of the hearing device 20 using calibration data, which may be stored in the hearing device 20 or a remote database 71. The validation may occur by comparing the level of a measured calibration stimuli 5, or a signal represented thereto, to a reference level. The measured level of the calibration signal input may be validated if the measured level is within an acceptable range, for example within 3 dB of the reference level. If the measured level of the calibration signal input for a particular frequency is validated, the processor continues to check the calibration at other frequencies until all audiometric frequencies of interest are validated. Alternatively, calibration stimuli may be a composite signal, or wide spectrum noise, representing the range of audiometric frequencies of interest. If the measured level of the calibration stimuli is found to be outside an acceptable range, the processor 41 may adjust the calibration data to compensate for out-of-range calibration. In some examples, the calibration check may indicate an acceptable change in electroacoustic characteristics of the speaker 21 or the microphone 16, or a more serious change requiring the hearing device 20 to be replaced, or sent to the manufacturer or a service center for inspection or recalibration. A failed device calibration check may be indicative of a damaged hearing device 20, for example a defective speaker 21 or microphone 16.
In some examples, out-of-range calibration measurements (e.g., measurements that deviate from the reference level outside of the accepted range) may be automatically adjusted for to recalibrate the hearing device 20. An adjustment to the calibration data may be a corrective measure to account for a difference between the measured level of the calibration signal input and an expected level defined in the software application. The difference may be minor or major depending on the cause. The hearing device 20 may be re-programmed with the adjusted calibration data.
A hearing device test system (e.g., hearing device test system 100) may be calibrated according to the examples herein. The hearing device test system 100 disclosed herein eliminates costly calibration checks, or recalibration, typically performed at the manufacturer site, or by a calibration technician in clinical settings. The hearing device test system 100 may allow for a calibration check of the hearing device 20 at home or non-clinical setting by a non-expert user, simply by inserting the hearing device 20 into the calibration cavity 3 and initiating a calibration check by a software application. In some examples, the calibration check may be initiated by activating a switch provided on the portable test unit 10 or the hearing device 20. In some examples, the calibration check sequence is rapid and takes less than 30 seconds. In some examples, tones at 500, 1,000, 2000 and 4,000 Hz may be produced and the calibration measurement may be compared with stored calibration data. In some examples, a composite signal including multiple frequencies may be produced and the calibration measurement may be compared with stored input calibration data at each frequency of interest. In some examples, the device calibration data may be adjusted to yield a calibration measurement within a calibration range. This self-contained calibration system eliminates the needs for specialized calibration instruments such as a sound level meter, an acoustic coupler, and sound level calibrator unit. The cost of these specialized instruments may be thousands of dollars, compared to the cost of under $100 for the hearing device calibration check system disclosed herein.
During a calibration check or during a self-calibration, hearing device 20 may receive a calibration signal to cause hearing device 20 to generate an acoustic calibration stimuli for conducting a calibration check or self-calibration of the hearing device 20. The hearing device 20 may produce an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 by audio streaming test signals from the computing device 30. The speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 may produce an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 in response to the calibration signal received from the computing device 30. In some examples, the hearing device 20 may produce an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 in response to the calibration signal received from the portable test unit 10. In other examples the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 is generated by the hearing device 20 from a calibration signal generator 24. The calibration signal may be generated based on calibration data (e.g., production calibration data 29) stored in memory. The hearing device 20 may be coupled to any of the computing device 30 and the portable test unit 10 for receiving the calibration signal or the request to generate it internally (e.g., using calibration signal generator 24) via a wired or wireless connection. The production calibration data 29 may be adjusted according to reference calibration data 46 stored in memory, as shown in
In some examples, individual components of the hearing device 20 may be isolated and checked separately to ascertain a cause of a failed validation of the hearing device. For example, the speaker 21 and sound processing electronics of the hearing device 20 may be checked in isolation by requesting delivery of an acoustic calibration stimuli 5. The microphone 16 of the hearing device 20 may be bypassed or disabled while the speaker 21 and sound processing electronics are being checked. A first signal level associated with the acoustic calibration stimuli in the acoustic calibration cavity may be measured by the test microphone 7 provided within the acoustic calibration cavity 3. A calibration of the hearing device speaker 21 may be validated by comparing the first signal level measured and a first reference level stored in a memory.
The functionality of the microphone 16 of the hearing device 20 may be checked in isolation by transmitting an acoustic test input to the hearing device 20. The acoustic test input may be the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 produced by the hearing device speaker 21, or by a speaker within the portable test unit 10. A second signal level may be measured by the hearing device microphone 16. In some examples, the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 may be delivered to the hearing device microphone 16 via a microphone calibration vent 9 that acoustically couples the calibration cavity 3 and the hearing device microphone 16. A functionality or calibration of the hearing device microphone 16 may be validated by comparing the second signal level measured and a second reference level stored in the memory. In some examples, the hearing device speaker 21 may be validated first before validating the hearing device microphone 16.
In some examples, the hearing device test system 100 may include a hearing aid fitting system. The hearing aid fitting system may request the hearing device 20 to produce a test output in-situ corresponding to predetermined input levels for a programmable hearing device 20. The hearing evaluation/fitting system may also include a programming interface 50 for interactively transmitting programming signals to the hearing device 20 in-situ. The fitting method may generally involve instructing the consumer to listen to the output of the hearing device 20 in-situ and to adjust fitting parameters interactively according to the subjective assessment of the consumer to the output delivered by the hearing device 20 in-situ. The fitting method may be implemented using a user interface 43 shown on a display 42 of the computing device 30. The user interface 43 of the fitting method may be configured to allow the consumer to respond and adjust hearing device parameters in perceptual lay terms, such as volume, loudness, audibility, clarity, and the like, rather than technical terms and complex graphical tools conventionally used by hearing professionals in clinical settings.
In some examples, the hearing device test system 100 may be in communication with a remote server 70 for an online calibration check, as shown in
In step 703, an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 is produced in the acoustic calibration cavity 3. The acoustic calibration stimuli 5 is sensed by the test microphone 7 provided within the acoustic calibration cavity 3. A remote server 70 may be accessed to retrieve reference calibration data. In step 704, the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 is received by the test microphone 7 to produce a calibration signal input. In step 706, the calibration signal input is delivered to the audio processing electronics 8. In step 708, a level of the calibration signal input is measured and compared with reference calibration data. In step 710, a determination may be made as to whether the level of the calibration signal input is within a predefined range of calibration (e.g., a reference level). If yes, then the calibration may terminate as shown in step 712. If no, then the calibration data may be automatically adjusted based on the calibration signal input measured as shown in step 708. The delivery of acoustic calibration stimuli in step 703, the delivery of step 706, the measuring of step 708, and the determination of step 710 may then be repeated for each frequency to be calibrated. Alternatively, a composite signal representing a multitude of audiometric frequencies may be produced and corresponding calibration signal input may be produced and analyzed using the appropriated processing, for example Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). It will be understood that any of the steps described above may be repeated or cycled until a determination is made whether the level of the calibration signal input is within the predefined range.
In step 803, an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 is produced in the acoustic calibration cavity 3 by the speaker 21 of the hearing device 20 being tested. The calibration signal produces an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 which is sensed by the test microphone 7 provided within the acoustic calibration cavity 3. A remote server 70 may be accessed to retrieve any of a hearing device test software application and the reference calibration data. In step 804, the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 is received by the test microphone 7 to produce a calibration signal input. In step 806, the calibration signal input is delivered to audio processing electronics 8. In step 808, a level of the calibration signal input is measured. In step 810, a determination may be made as to whether the level of the calibration signal input is within a predefined range of calibration (e.g., a reference level). If yes, then a successful calibration check message is indicated as shown in step 812. If no, then a failed calibration check message is indicated as shown in step 814.
In step 1102, an acoustic calibration stimuli 5 may be delivered from a hearing device speaker 21 into a calibration cavity 3 of a portable test unit 1, wherein the calibration cavity 3 is provided along an external surface of the portable test unit 1. Prior to delivery of the calibration stimuli 5, the hearing device 20 should be properly inserted into the acoustic calibration cavity 3 of the portable test unit 10, or into the test cavity of an acoustic adapter 6. In step 1103, a first signal level of the acoustic calibration stimuli 5 in the calibration cavity 3 may be measured by a test microphone 7 within the calibration cavity 3. In step 1104, a calibration of the hearing device speaker may be validated by comparing the first signal level measured and a first reference level stored in a memory. In step 1105, a determination may be made as to whether the first signal level measured is within a predefined range of calibration (e.g., a first reference level). If yes, then a calibration of the speaker and/or the sound processing electronics of the hearing device may be determined to be valid and step 1106 may take place. Steps 1102 to 1106 may be repeated for each test frequency, typically in the range of 250 to 8,000 Hz. If no, then a calibration of the speaker and/or the sound processing electronics of the hearing device may be determined to be invalid. In step 1107, a second signal is presented and level of the acoustic calibration signal through the hearing device microphone 16 may be measured. The acoustic calibration stimuli 5 may be delivered by a microphone calibration vent 9 associated with the calibration cavity 3. The microphone calibration vent 9 may be configured to acoustically couple the calibration cavity 3 and the hearing device microphone 16. In step 1108, a calibration of the hearing device microphone 16 may be validated by comparing the second signal level measured and a second reference level stored in the memory. In step 1109, a determination may be made as to whether the second signal level measured is within a predefined range of calibration (e.g., a second reference level). If yes, then a successful microphone calibration check is indicated as shown in step 1111. If no, then a failed calibration check is indicated as shown in step 1110.
In some examples, the acoustic calibration cavity 3 is provided along the outer surface of the portable test unit 10 to produce a precise and controlled acoustic transfer function when the hearing device is accommodated therein. The calibration cavity is generally shaped to match the shape of the medial end of the hearing device. The calibration cavity volume may formed to be in the range of about 0.1 to about 0.5 cc to minimize the size of the hand-held hearing device test unit. Other shapes and configurations of the calibration cavity are conceivable depending on the shape and type of the hearing device used.
Although embodiments of the invention are described herein, variations and modifications of these embodiments may be made, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the above-described embodiments of the invention should not be viewed as exhaustive or as limiting the invention to the precise configurations or techniques disclosed. Rather, it is intended that the invention shall be limited only by the appended claims and the rules and principles of applicable law.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of the earlier filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/100,876 entitled “HEARING DEVICE TEST SYSTEM FOR NON-EXPERT USER AT HOME AND NON-CLINICAL SETTINGS,” filed Jan. 7, 2015. The aforementioned provisional application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, for any purpose. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,556, titled, “CANAL HEARING DEVICE WITH DISPOSABLE BATTERY MODULE,” filed on Sep. 9, 2010; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,855,345, titled “BATTERY MODULE FOR PERPENDICULAR DOCKING INTO A CANAL HEARING DEVICE,” filed on Mar. 19, 2012; and U.S. Pending patent application Ser. No. 14/011,620, titled, “HEARING PROFILE TEST SYSTEM AND METHOD,” filed on Aug. 27, 2013; Ser. No. 14/011,581, titled, “INTERACTIVE HEARING AID FITTING SYSTEM AND METHODS,” filed on Aug. 27, 2013; Ser. No. 14/011,607, titled “ONLINE HEARING AID FITTING SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR NON-EXPERT USER,” filed on Aug. 27, 2013; and 62/047,607, titled “HEARING TEST SYSTEM FOR NON-EXPERT USER WITH BUILT-IN CALIBRATION AND METHOD,” filed on Sep. 9, 2014; all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for any purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4759070 | Voroba | Jul 1988 | A |
5197332 | Shennib | Mar 1993 | A |
5327500 | Campbell | Jul 1994 | A |
5553152 | Newton | Sep 1996 | A |
5645074 | Shennib et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659621 | Newton | Aug 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5785661 | Shennib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5928160 | Clark | Jul 1999 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6212283 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6319207 | Naidoo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6359993 | Brimhall | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6367578 | Shoemaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379314 | Horn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382346 | Brimhall et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6428485 | Rho | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447461 | Eldon | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473513 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6522988 | Hou | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546108 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6674862 | Magilen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6816601 | Lin et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840908 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6937735 | DeRoo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940988 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6978155 | Berg | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7010137 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016511 | Shennib | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7037274 | Thoraton et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7113611 | Leedom et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7215789 | Shennib et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7260232 | Shennib | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7298857 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310426 | Shennib et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321663 | Olsen | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7403629 | Aceti et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7424123 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424124 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7580537 | Urso et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7664282 | Urso et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7854704 | Givens et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7945065 | Menzl et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8073170 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077890 | Schumaier | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8155361 | Schindler | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8184842 | Howard et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8243972 | Latzel | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284968 | Schumaier | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287462 | Givens et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8379871 | Michael et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8396237 | Schumaier | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8447042 | Gurin | May 2013 | B2 |
8467556 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8503703 | Eaton et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8571247 | Oezer | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8718306 | Gommel et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8798301 | Shennib | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8855345 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9031247 | Shennib | May 2015 | B2 |
9060233 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078075 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9107016 | Shennib | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9326706 | Shennib | May 2016 | B2 |
9439008 | Shennib | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20010008560 | Stonikas et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010009019 | Armitage | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010051775 | Rho | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020015506 | Aceti | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027996 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020085728 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030007647 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078515 | Menzel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040028250 | Shim | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073136 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136555 | Enzmann | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165742 | Shennib et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050094822 | Swartz | May 2005 | A1 |
20050190938 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226447 | Miller, III | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245991 | Faltys et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249370 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259829 | Van den Heuvel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259840 | Gable et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283263 | Eaton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060094981 | Camp | May 2006 | A1 |
20060210090 | Shennib | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210104 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060291683 | Urso et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019834 | Nielson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070071265 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076909 | Roeck et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070189545 | Geiger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223721 | Stern et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237346 | Fichtl et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080240452 | Burrows et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273726 | Yoo et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090103764 | Stiehl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100040250 | Gerbert | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100119094 | Sjursen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145411 | Spitzer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191143 | Ganter | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100226520 | Feeley et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100239112 | Howard et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268115 | Wasden et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284556 | Young | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110009770 | Margolis | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110058697 | Shennib et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110100127 | Beck | May 2011 | A1 |
20110176686 | Zaccaria | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188689 | Beck et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110190658 | Sohn et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200216 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206225 | Møller et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110237103 | Harlan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120051569 | Blamey et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095528 | Miller, III et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130271 | Margolis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120157876 | Bang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177212 | Hou et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120177235 | Solum | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183164 | Foo et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183165 | Foo et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189140 | Hughes | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120213393 | Foo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215532 | Foo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120285470 | Sather et al. | Nov 2012 | A9 |
20120288107 | Lamm | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302859 | Keefe | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130010406 | Stanley | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130177188 | Apfel et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182877 | Angst et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130223666 | Michel et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130243209 | Zurbruegg et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130243227 | Kinsbergen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130243229 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130294631 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140003639 | Shennib et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140150234 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140153761 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140153762 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140254843 | Shennib | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140254844 | Shennib | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150023512 | Shennib | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023534 | Shennib | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023535 | Shennib | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025413 | Shennib | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150215714 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150256942 | Kinsbergen et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160066822 | Shennib et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160337770 | Shennib | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350821 | Shennib et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
57188235 | Nov 1982 | JP |
06105828 | Apr 1994 | JP |
2002191581 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2005168856 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2008109594 | May 2008 | JP |
1020050114861 | Dec 2005 | KR |
100955033 | Apr 2010 | KR |
1020100042370 | Apr 2010 | KR |
9907182 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2006136174 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2010091480 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011128462 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2015009559 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015009561 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015009564 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015009569 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Internet Archive, World Health Organization website “Grades of Hearing Impairment”. Retrieved from <https://web.archive.org/web/20121024120107/http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/hearing_impairment_grades/en> on Aug. 27, 2015. |
“Basic Guide to in Ear Canalphones”, Internet Archive, Head-Fi.org, Jul. 1, 2012. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20120701013243/http:www.head-fi.org/a/basic-guide-to-in-ear-canalphones> on Apr. 14, 2015. |
“dB HL—Sensitivity to Sound—Clinical Audiograms”, Internet Archive, AuditoryNeuroscience.com, Apr. 20, 2013. Retrieved from <https://web.archive.org/web/20130420060438/http://www.auditoryneuroschience.com/acoustics/clinical_audiograms>on Apr. 14, 2015. |
“Lyric User Guide”, http://www.phonak.com/content/dam/phonak/b2b/C_M_tools/Hearing_Insstruments/Lyric/documents/02-gb/Userguide_Lyric_V8_GB_FINAL_WEB.pdf, Jul. 2010. |
“Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index”, American National Standards Institute, Jun. 6, 1997. |
“Specification for Audiometers”, American National Standards Institute, Nov. 2, 2010. |
“The Audiogram”, Internet Archive, ASHA.org, Jun. 21, 2012. Retrieved from <https:/web.archive.org/web/20120621202942/http://www.asha.org/public/hearing/Audiogram> on Apr. 14, 2015. |
“User Manual—2011”, AMP Personal Audio Amplifiers. |
Abrams, , “A Patient-adjusted Fine-tuning Approach for Optimizing the Hearing Aid Response”, The Hearing Review, Mar. 24, 2011, 1-8. |
Amlani, et al., “Methods and Applications of the Audibility Index in Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting”, Trends in Amplication 6.3 (2002) 81. Retrieved from <https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168961/> on Apr. 14, 2015. |
Asha, , “Type, Degree, and Configuration of Hearing Loss”, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; Audiology Information Series, May 2011, 1-2. |
Convery, et al., “A Self-Fitting Hearing Aid: Need and Concept”, http://tia.sagepubl.com, Dec. 4, 2011, 1-10. |
Franks, “Hearing Measurements”, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Jun. 2006, 183-232. |
Kiessling, , “Hearing aid fitting procedures—state-of-the-art and current issues”, Scandinavian Audiology vol. 30, Suppl 52, 2001, 57-59. |
Kryter, , “Methods for the calculation and use of the articulation index”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34.11 (1962): 1689-1697. Retrieved from <http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1909094> on Aug. 27, 2015. |
Nhanes, , “Audiometry Procedures Manual”, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Jan. 2003, 1-105. |
Sindhusake, et al., “Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains hearing study”, International Journal of Epidemiology 30.6 (2001 ): 1371-1378. Retrieved from <http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/6/1371.full> on Aug. 27, 2015. |
Traynor, , “Prescriptive Procedures”, www.rehab.research.va.gov/mono/ear/traynor.htm, Jan. 1999, 1-16. |
World Health Organization, , “Deafness and Hearing Loss”, www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/index.html, Feb. 2013, 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160198271 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62100876 | Jan 2015 | US |