The present invention relates to a hearing protector comprising a hearing hood with passive noise damping, a microphone disposed exteriorly on the hearing protector, a loudspeaker disposed inside the hood and an amplifier for amplifying sound signals caused by the microphone and transmitting the signals to the loudspeaker.
Hearing protectors are often employed in noisy environments, such as factories, airports etc. Such hearing protectors consist of two muffs or hoods manufactured from hard material, for example plastic, which sealingly surround the ears of the wearer and which are connected to one another by the intermediary of a headband. Interiorly in the muffs or hoods, there is provided as a rule a porous noise absorbent agent. The employment of hearing protectors has increased at the same rate as awareness has grown of the risks of loss of hearing caused by noise, and developments are constantly being made of the hearing protectors which occur on the market in order to make them more user-friendly, so that the desired level of use is encouraged. The majority of hearing protectors utilise so-called passive damping, i.e. a damping that takes place with the aid of the material included in the muffs or hoods and noise absorbent agents disposed in them.
A remaining problem in the employment of hearing protectors is that there is often a need to listen to requisite sound, such as instructions, or other conversations from a person in the vicinity, at the same time as the intention is to impede as much background noise as possible.
Hearing protectors occur on the market which, in response to the level, damp noise above a certain sound level. In this level-dependent damping, the hearing protector allows the passage of all sound up to a pre-determined sound level, with the aid of a microphone, an amplifier and a loudspeaker disposed inside the hearing muff or hood. When this level is exceeded, the electronics are shut off and all sound is damped by passive damping.
There also occur different types of communication systems in connection with hearing protection. For example, all people in factory premises may be provided with hearing protection which includes a radio receiver. The radio transmissions that can be received are often standard radio channels, but may also include or consist of a local transmission at the company in question. By such means, centrally transmitted instructions, alerts and other information are received as a one-way communication, but the system does not satisfy the need for communication between the individual recipients.
A problem common to existing hearing protectors is that they are not used in those cases where they are experienced as being inconvenient to use. Instead, there is a tendency that the user quite simply removes the hearing protector when s/he wishes to talk to someone else, for example to receive instructions or the like. Thereafter, there is a major risk that the wearer forgets to replace the hearing protector, with a consequential increase in the risk of loss of hearing through noise.
The invention provides a hearing protector which affords the possibility of selective communication, in which event the hearing protector should be so simple to use that the risk of loss of hearing through noise is minimised. At the same time, the audible sensitivity to speech should be maximised when communication is desired.
The hearing protector of the invention provides that the noise damping of the hearing hood is broad-band, that the amplifier has variable amplification and frequency range which corresponds to the frequency range of human speech, and that the amplifier has a maximum predetermined amplification, where the sum total of the sound levels that are caused, on the one hand by ambient sound passing through the hood, and on the other hand by sound emitted by the loudspeaker amounts to a maximum predetermined value.
Further advantages will be attained if the hearing protector according to the present invention is further given one or more of the characterising features as set forth in the appended claims.
The present invention will now be described in greater detail hereinbelow, with reference to the accompanying Drawings. In the accompanying Drawings:
The hoods 2 have hard outer shells and a damping interior which may be provided in a manner that is previously known in the art. For example, the hoods 2 may be provided with double shells or some other type of passive noise damping. Further, the hoods 2 each display a sealing ring 5 for abutment against the head of the user around the user's ears. The sealing rings 5 may be designed in any optional manner which is previously known in the art.
According to the present invention, at least the one hood 2 has a unit 6 which makes for communication to the person wearing the hearing protector. The unit comprises a microphone 7 disposed exteriorly on the hood 2, an electronics unit with an amplifier with variable amplification and possibly adjustable band width, as well as a loudspeaker 28 (
The microphone 7 is preferably a microphone possessing no particular directional effect, in other words a so-called broadcast microphone 7. This implies that the microphone 7 per se has the capability to take up sound regardless of the position of the source of the sound in relation to the microphone 7. The positioning of the microphone 7 should also be such that its function is not essentially affected by the direction in which the hearing protector 1 is turned for maximum flexibility in the use thereof. In this case, the microphone, as is clearly apparent from
In certain cases, a forwardly directed positioning of the microphone 7 may be preferred. In this embodiment, the microphone is directionally active and is turned to face towards a person standing in front of and speaking to the wearer of the hearing protector.
An activator button 8 is provided and is designed so that it is readily accessible by the user. The positioning of this button should also be such that it functions equally well regardless of in which direction the hearing protector is facing. This implies that a satisfactory function of one and the same hearing protector will be attained regardless of whether the user is right-handed or left-handed or whether the user, for one reason or another, wears the hearing protector back-to-front.
Further, the covering plate 11 has a recess 13 for accommodating the operating device in the form of the activator button 8. A similar recess 14 is disposed on the opposing side of the battery recess 12 for accommodating the microphone 7 provided in the removable unit 6.
The removable unit 6 also includes a loudspeaker and electronic components for realising both amplification and broad-band restriction of incoming sonic signals and a timer function for shutting off the electronics after a given predetermined time.
The fact that the perforations 27 are placed in the bottom of the recess 23 implies that they are also placed close to the opening of the acoustic meatus of the wearer. This entails that the sound from the loudspeaker will be perceived as more dominant in relation to the ambient noise which penetrates through the hearing hood, for which reason the amplification by the amplifier may be made weaker without any deterioration of the audibility of the spoken word emitted by the loudspeaker. This implies less electric power consumption and consequentially a longer service life for the batteries.
The properties of the bottom 25 correspond to those of the outer defining wall of the hearing hood 2, i.e. the removable unit 6 is functionally disposed on the outside of the hearing hood 2, while, in terms of appearance, it is recessed in the hearing hood 2. Consequently, in order to keep the bottom tight against the outside and prevent noise coming from outside from being allowed through the perforation 27, the portion of the removable unit 6 around the loudspeaker sealingly abuts against the edge of the depression 24. The sealing abutment may be realised in any optional manner which is previously known in the art.
Since the bottom 25 is to be considered as a part of the defining wall of the hood 2, no further seals are required between the removable unit 6 and the edge of the recess 23. Nor is it necessary to provide any special sealing at the battery hatch 10.
The removable unit 6, which is not shown in
The hearing protector 1 functions as follows:
On those occasions when the user wishes to listen to someone or something, the activator button 8 is depressed, which activates the microphone 7 and the associated amplifier which transmits sound to the inwardly directed loudspeaker. The sound taken up by the microphone 7, i.e. preferably speech, is amplified to a suitable sound level inside the hearing protector. Any possible background noise is amplified as little as possible. When the communication is completed and the reception of more sound signals from the microphone 7 is no long required, the electronics are deactivated by the release of the activator button 8. An alternative to manual deactivation is that the electronics in the hearing protector 1 automatically shut off the loudspeaker after a given time lapse.
The automatic shut off is realised in practice with the aid of a special delay circuit which, after a predetermined time lapse from activation once again shuts off the electronics of the hearing protector. In the preferred embodiment, the time delay is about 20 seconds. If the intention is to interrupt communication earlier, the electronics are manually shut off by once again depressing the activator button 8. A variation where the activator button 8 is held depressed continuously for a longer period of time and the automatic shut off is disabled while the button is held depressed is less satisfactory since the deactivation function would then be rendered inoperative, for example in that the button 8 is taped down.
The electronics in the unit are formed in such a manner that they display a variable amplification of the incoming signal via the microphone 7, where the level of amplification is varied so that the higher the sound level that is sensed by the electronics, the lower will be the level of amplification. The amplification is limited to a value where the level of the sound emitted by the loudspeaker together with the level of the ambient noise that penetrates through the protector hood amounts to such a maximum predetermined value as is considered tolerable in view of the risk of loss of hearing due to noise. If the penetrating ambient noise alone reaches this value, the electronics are kept disabled so that the loudspeaker is silent.
The hearing protector hood per se displays passive noise damping with large band width. As a result, ambient noise is damped within a broad frequency range. Customised adaptation to certain noisy environments, with particularly good damping in certain frequency bands can naturally be put into effect. One example might be noisy environments with very low frequencies.
The protector hood 2 also displays frequency limitation for those frequencies that are amplified via the electronics. The interesting range for understanding the spoken word extends from 125 to 6000 Hz. The focal point lies between these extreme limits, for which reason the preferred system of microphone 7, loudspeaker 28 and amplifier preferably operates in the range of from about 500 Hz to 3500 Hz, i.e. within the frequency range of human speech. These limits are merely exemplified, for which reason the figure values may vary, depending on the steepness of the filters which are employed for the frequency limitation.
According to the present invention, it is possible to vary, within the pass band of the electronics, the amplification according to frequency so that a “equaliser effect” is achieved and as a result the understanding of spoken sound transmitted via the electronics will be optimised.
The hearing protector 1 possesses, as was mentioned above, passive damping. The passive damping is frequency-responsive and is affected by the appearance, design and other properties of the hood 2. In order for the present invention to be usable, the protector hood 2 should be of such a type that in itself damps noise effectively.
In the preferred embodiment, a given configuration of the unit 6 was shown. It is naturally possible to vary the appearance of this unit in innumerable different ways, as well as to design it as an integral part of the hood proper.
It will be apparent from
It will further be apparent from
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0303189 | Nov 2003 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2004/001709 | 11/23/2004 | WO | 00 | 2/12/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/051255 | 6/9/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2235372 | Kalbitz | Mar 1941 | A |
3087028 | Bonnin | Apr 1963 | A |
3306991 | Wood | Feb 1967 | A |
3394226 | Andrews, Jr. | Jul 1968 | A |
3456263 | Aileo | Jul 1969 | A |
3579640 | Beguin | Feb 1970 | A |
3833939 | Dostourian | Sep 1974 | A |
3869584 | Wilde | Mar 1975 | A |
3890474 | Glicksberg | Jun 1975 | A |
3952158 | Kyle et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4027113 | Matsumoto | May 1977 | A |
4064362 | Williams | Dec 1977 | A |
4066849 | Chladil, Sr. | Jan 1978 | A |
4087653 | Frieder, Jr. | May 1978 | A |
4302635 | Jacobsen | Nov 1981 | A |
4327257 | Schwartz | Apr 1982 | A |
4677678 | McCutchen | Jun 1987 | A |
4829571 | Kakiuchi | May 1989 | A |
4833719 | Carme | May 1989 | A |
4867149 | Falco | Sep 1989 | A |
4928311 | Trompler | May 1990 | A |
4965836 | Andre | Oct 1990 | A |
4985925 | Langberg | Jan 1991 | A |
5125032 | Meister et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5181252 | Sapiejewski | Jan 1993 | A |
5251263 | Andrea | Oct 1993 | A |
5402497 | Nishimoto | Mar 1995 | A |
5497427 | Nageno | Mar 1996 | A |
5519783 | Kumar | May 1996 | A |
5550923 | Hotvet | Aug 1996 | A |
5631965 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5675658 | Brittain | Oct 1997 | A |
6631279 | Rivera | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6704428 | Wurtz | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724906 | Naksen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728388 | Nageno | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748087 | Jones | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801629 | Brimhall | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6965681 | Almqvist | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970571 | Knorr | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7099485 | Dittli | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7245735 | Han | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7308106 | Vaudrey | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327850 | Crump | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7391878 | Liao | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7664282 | Urso | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8130971 | Werner | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010046304 | Rast | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001391 | Darbut | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003889 | Fischer | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020080979 | Brimhall et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080987 | Almqvist | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030223612 | Knorr et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040125976 | Reneker | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125977 | Hong | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040258253 | Wurtz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013447 | Crump et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070183606 | Doty | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070274529 | Nordin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080011084 | Von Dach | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080192973 | Heringslack | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080279411 | Suzuki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20110124300 | Sinai | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10117704 | Jun 2001 | DE |
0465971 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0967592 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1629808 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2695302 | Mar 1994 | FR |
1160431 | Aug 1969 | GB |
1289993 | Sep 1972 | GB |
2445984 | Jul 2008 | GB |
WO 8704065 | Jul 1987 | WO |
WO 9107153 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 9608004 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9728742 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 0217838 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03086124 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2005051255 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006118514 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008099137 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008113822 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070274529 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |