The present patent document relates generally to heart valve sizing rings and more particularly to a heart valve sizing ring configured for valve-sparing aortic root remodeling procedures.
Referring to
However, if the correct graft size is not selected during the repair, the surgeon may not be able to properly reshape the valve 10, thereby leading prolonged and/or suboptimal surgical operations which could lead to complications and poor outcomes.
Therefore, there is a perceived need in the industry for a method and device to allow a surgeon to easily size and test a valve repair in valve-sparing aortic root remodeling procedures.
The present invention solves the problems of the prior art by providing a heart valve sizing ring system that includes and outer ring and an interlocking inner ring. The inner ring further includes a tubular portion that can be used to test and simulate whether the heart valve has been properly sized prior to installing a permanent graft prosthesis. The tubular portion may additionally include suture holders at the top to aid the surgeon in recreating valve geometry and function by “suspending” the commissures within the tubular portion thus assisting with evaluation/testing of proper graft/valve size selection.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
Referring now to
Sutures 14 at the base of the heart valve 10 are captured between the inner and outer rings 102,104, thereby temporarily anchoring the heart valve sizing ring 100 to the heart valve 10. The inner and outer rings 102, 104, may include a concave and convex surfaces 102a, 104b, to facilitate retention of the sutures 14. The surfaces may optionally be coated with a rubber-type of coating to gently grip the sutures and prevent slipping. Because the inner and outer rings 102, 104 form a rigid structure, the precise size of the annular diameter is provided during evaluation.
The valve commissures 16 are suspended temporarily using the suture holders 108, such as slots, via the commissure sutures 18. This allows for the valve leaflet 12 distance and apposition to be properly evaluated by creating a “quick preview” of what valve function would be like should a graft of that size be selected. Several different graft sizes can be tested and compared in a relatively short time prior to final graft selection. Note that this system can be used with either a “straight” tube graft or with a “Valsalva” type of tube graft (in which the sides of the graft “bow” outward slightly).
The pictured slots as suture holders 108 represent one embodiment that may facilitate commissural suspension, though, this could be accomplished by other mechanisms as well, such as clipping the commissure sutures 18 to the tube wall, etc. The material of the tubular portion 106 is not restricted and can be made of a stiffer material than the graft prosthesis if it is only being used for sizing purposes. The slots 108 can have an additional rubber-type of coating or some other material that is advantages in gently gripping and holding the commissure sutures 18.
It would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to be within the scope of the present invention.
This patent document claims priority to earlier filed U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/713,115, filed Oct. 12, 2012, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/658,050, filed Oct. 23, 2012, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/871,327, filed on Apr. 26, 2013, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/251,965, filed on Jan. 18, 2019, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5071431 | Sauter et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5360014 | Sauter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5489296 | Love et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5669919 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5814096 | Lam et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5843177 | Vanney et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6019739 | Rhee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6110200 | Hinnenkamp | Aug 2000 | A |
6458155 | Van Nguyen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6678962 | Love et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702763 | Murphy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719785 | Schoon et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7338484 | Schoon et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20080033544 | Lemmon | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090093877 | Keidar et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090210051 | Camedda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100030329 | Frater | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100152844 | Couetil | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100262043 | Sauter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120065729 | Pintor et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071968 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11206739 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2012019052 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Peters Surgical, “uniRing Universal Annuloplasty System”, 2007 http://www.zenomedical.com/Images/Products/Brochures/uniRing.pdf. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200297492 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61713115 | Oct 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16251965 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16881579 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13871327 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 16251965 | US | |
Parent | 13658050 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 13871327 | US |