Patent Grant
10161056
The present invention relates generally to the field of graphitic materials for heat dissipation applications, and more particularly to a graphene oxide-derived graphene monolith or graphene single crystal that exhibits a combination of an exceptionally high thermal conductivity, high electrical conductivity, high mechanical strength, good surface scratch resistance, and good hardness.
Carbon is known to have five unique crystalline structures, including diamond, fullerene (0-D nano graphitic material), carbon nanotube (1-D nano graphitic material), graphene (2-D nano graphitic material), and graphite (3-D graphitic material).
The carbon nanotube (CNT) refers to a tubular structure grown with a single wall or multi-wall. Carbon nanotubes have a diameter on the order of a few nanometers to a few hundred nanometers. Its longitudinal, hollow structure imparts unique mechanical, electrical and chemical properties to the material. CNT is a 1-D (one-dimensional) nano carbon or 1-D nano graphite material.
Bulk natural flake graphite is a 3-D graphitic material with each particle being composed of multiple grains (or graphite single crystals or crystallites) with grain boundaries (amorphous or defect zones) demarcating neighboring graphite single crystals. Each grain is composed of multiple graphene planes oriented parallel to one another. A graphene plane in a graphite crystallite is composed of carbon atoms occupying a two-dimensional, hexagonal lattice. In a given grain or single crystal, the graphene planes are stacked and bonded via van der Waal forces in the crystallographic c-direction (perpendicular to the graphene plane or basal plane). Although all the graphene planes in one grain are parallel to one another, typically the graphene planes in one grain and the graphene planes in an adjacent grain are different in orientation. In other words, the orientations of the various grains in a graphite particle typically differ from one grain to another.
A graphite single crystal (crystallite) is anisotropic with a property measured along a direction in the basal plane (crystallographic a or b direction) being dramatically different than if measured along the crystallographic c-direction (thickness direction). For instance, the thermal conductivity of a graphite single crystal can be up to approximately 1,920 W/mK (theoretical) or 1,800 W/mK (experimental) in the basal plane (crystallographic a- and b-axis directions), but that along the crystallographic c-axis direction is less than 10 W/mK (typically less than 5 W/mK). Consequently, a natural graphite particle composed of multiple grains of different orientations has a property lying between these two extremes. It would be highly desirable in many applications to produce a bulk graphite particle (containing single or multiple grains) having sufficiently large dimensions and having all graphene planes being essentially parallel to one another along one desired direction. For instance, it is highly desirable to have one bulk graphite particle (e.g. a unitary layer entity of multiple graphene planes) with all the graphene planes being substantially parallel to one another) and this unitary layer entity has a sufficiently large length/width for a particular application (e.g. >5 cm2 for use as a heat-spreading sheet on a CPU of a smart phone). It has not been possible to produce this type of large unitary graphene entity from existing natural or synthetic graphite particles.
The constituent graphene planes of a graphite crystallite can be extracted or isolated from a graphite crystallite to form individual graphene sheets of carbon atoms. An isolated, individual graphene sheet is commonly referred to as single-layer graphene. A stack of multiple graphene planes bonded through van der Waals forces in the thickness direction is commonly referred to as a multi-layer graphene, typically having up to 300 layers or graphene planes (<100 nm in thickness), but more typically up to 30 graphene planes (<10 nm in thickness), even more typically up to 20 graphene planes (<7 nm in thickness), and most typically up to 10 graphene planes (commonly referred to as few-layer graphene in scientific community). Single-layer graphene and multi-layer graphene sheets are collectively called “nano graphene platelets” (NGPs). Graphene or NGP is a new class of carbon nano material (a 2-D nano carbon) that is distinct from the 0-D fullerene, the 1-D CNT, and the 3-D graphite.
Our research group pioneered the development of graphene materials and related production processes as early as 2002: (1) B. Z. Jang and W. C. Huang, “Nano-scaled Graphene Plates,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,071,258 (Jul. 4, 2006), application submitted in October 2012; (2) B. Z. Jang, et al. “Process for Producing Nano-scaled Graphene Plates,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/858,814 (Jun. 3, 2004); and (3) B. Z. Jang, A. Zhamu, and J. Guo, “Process for Producing Nano-scaled Platelets and Nanocomposites,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/509,424 (Aug. 25, 2006).
NGPs are typically obtained by intercalating natural graphite particles with a strong acid and/or oxidizing agent to obtain a graphite intercalation compound (GIC) or graphite oxide (GO), as illustrated in
Route 1 involves removing water from the suspension to obtain “expandable graphite,” which is essentially a mass of dried GIC or dried graphite oxide particles. Upon exposure of expandable graphite to a temperature in the range of typically 800-1,050° C. for approximately 30 seconds to 2 minutes, the GIC undergoes a rapid expansion by a factor of 30-300 to form “graphite worms” (24 or 104), which are each a collection of exfoliated, but largely un-separated or still interconnected graphite flakes. A SEM image of graphite worms is presented in
In Route 1A, these graphite worms (exfoliated graphite or “networks of interconnected/non-separated graphite flakes”) can be re-compressed to obtain flexible graphite sheets or foils (26 or 106) that typically have a thickness in the range of 0.125 mm (125 μm)-0.5 mm (500 μm). One may choose to use a low-intensity air mill or shearing machine to simply break up the graphite worms for the purpose of producing the so-called “expanded graphite flakes” (108) which contain mostly graphite flakes or platelets thicker than 100 nm (hence, not a nano material by definition).
Exfoliated graphite worms, expanded graphite flakes, and the recompressed mass of graphite worms (commonly referred to as flexible graphite sheet or flexible graphite foil) are all 3-D graphitic materials that are fundamentally different and patently distinct from either the 1-D nano carbon material (CNT) or the 2-D nano carbon material (graphene).
As disclosed by M. Smalc, et al, U.S. Pat. No. 7,292,441 (Nov. 6, 2007) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,982,874 (Jun. 3, 2006), and J. W. Tzeng, U.S. Pat. No. 6,482,520 (Nov. 19, 2002), these flexible graphite (FG) foils can be used as a heat spreader material, but exhibiting a maximum in-plane thermal conductivity of typically less than 500 W/mK (more typically <300 W/mK) and in-plane electrical conductivity no greater than 1,500 S/cm. These low conductivity values are a direct result of the many defects, wrinkled or folded graphite flakes, interruptions or gaps between graphite flakes, and non-parallel flakes (e.g. SEM image in
In Route 1B, the exfoliated graphite is subjected to high-intensity mechanical shearing (e.g. using an ultrasonicator, high-shear mixer, high-intensity air jet mill, or high-energy ball mill) to form separated single-layer and multi-layer graphene sheets (collectively called NGPs, 33 or 112), as disclosed in our U.S. application Ser. No. 10/858,814. Single-layer graphene can be as thin as 0.34 nm, while multi-layer graphene can have a thickness up to 100 nm. In the present application, the thickness of multi-layer NGPs is typically less than 20 nm.
Route 2 entails ultrasonicating the graphite oxide suspension for the purpose of separating/isolating individual graphene oxide sheets from graphite oxide particles. This is based on the notion that the inter-graphene plane separation has been increased from 0.335 nm in natural graphite to 0.6-1.1 nm in highly oxidized graphite oxide, significantly weakening the van der Waals forces that hold neighboring planes together. Ultrasonic power can be sufficient to further separate graphene plane sheets to form separated, isolated, or discrete graphene oxide (GO) sheets. These graphene oxide sheets can then be chemically or thermally reduced to obtain “reduced graphene oxides” (RGO) typically having an oxygen content of 0.01%-10% by weight, more typically 0.01%-5% by weight.
For the purpose of defining the claims of the instant application, NGPs include single-layer and multi-layer graphene or reduced graphene oxide with an oxygen content of 0-10% by weight, more typically 0-5% by weight, and preferably 0-2% weight. Pristine graphene has essentially 0% oxygen. Graphene oxide (including RGO) can have 0.01%-46% by weight of oxygen. The graphene oxide gel, to be described in detail later, typically contains 20-46% by weight oxygen. The graphene oxide gel-derived unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal of the present invention typically has an oxygen content of 0.01% to 5% by weight, more typically less than 2% by weight.
It may be noted that flexible graphite foils (obtained by re-compressing exfoliated graphite worms) for electronic device thermal management applications (e.g. as a heat spreader) have the following major deficiencies:
Other sheet-like graphitic materials that can be used as a heat spreader or thermal interface material include carbon nanotube (CNT) paper (e.g. Bucky paper), carbon fiber mat (e.g. carbon nanofiber or CNF mat), and carbon paper (e.g. made of short carbon fibers). These graphitic sheets also suffer from similar shortcomings as FG foils. For instance, although individual CNTs or CNFs alone can exhibit a high thermal conductivity (1,500-3000 W/mK), the resulting CNT or CNF paper or mat typically exhibit an in-plane thermal conductivity less than 100 W/mK and often less than 10 W/mK, likely due to the few and poor contacts between individual CNT or CNF filaments, providing insufficient cross-sections for electron flow or even impeding electron flow. Further, the contact between a sheet-like graphitic layer and a heat source is usually poor due to limited contact surfaces between such a graphitic layer (e.g. CNT paper) and a rigid device component (e.g. a CPU in a mobile phone). This results in an ineffective heat transfer between the heat source and the graphitic layer.
Similarly, the NGPs (including discrete platelets of pristine graphene and GRO), when packed into a film or paper sheet (34 or 114) of non-woven aggregates, typically do not exhibit a high thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity is found to be higher than 1,000 W/mK only when the film or paper is cast and pressed into a sheet having a thickness lower than 10 μm, and higher than 1,500 W/mK only when the film or paper is cast and greatly pressed into a sheet having a thickness lower than 1 μm. This is reported in our earlier U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/784,606 (Apr. 9, 2007). However, ultra-thin film or paper sheets (<10 μm) are difficult to produce in mass quantities, and difficult to handle when one tries to incorporate these thin films as a heat spreader material during the manufacturing of microelectronic devices. Further, thickness dependence of thermal conductivity (not being able to achieve a high thermal conductivity at a wide range of film thicknesses) is not a desirable feature.
In general, paper made from platelets of graphene, graphene oxide, and RGO (e.g. those paper sheets prepared by vacuum-assisted filtration process) exhibit many defects, wrinkled or folded graphene sheets, interruptions or gaps between platelets, and non-parallel platelets (e.g. SEM image in
Our earlier application (U.S. application Ser. No. 11/784,606) further disclosed a mat, film, or paper of NGPs infiltrated with a metal, glass, ceramic, resin, and CVD graphite matrix material. Later on, Haddon, et al (US Pub. No. 2010/0140792, Jun. 10, 2010) also reported NGP thin film and NGP-polymer composites for thermal management applications. The processes used by Haddon et al to produce NGPs are identical to those disclosed much earlier by us (Jang, et al. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/858,814 (Jun. 3, 2004)). The NGP-polymer composites, as an intended thermal interface material, have very low thermal conductivity, typically <<2 W/mK. The NGP films of Haddon, et al are essentially non-woven aggregates of discrete graphene platelets, identical to those of our earlier invention (U.S. application Ser. No. 11/784,606). Again, these aggregates have a great tendency to have graphite particles flaking and separated from the film surface, creating internal shorting problem for the electronic device containing these aggregates. They also exhibit low thermal conductivity unless made into thin films (10 nm-300 nm, as reported by Haddon, et al) which are very difficult to handle in a real device manufacturing environment. Balandin, et al (US Pub. No. 2010/0085713, Apr. 8, 2010) also disclosed a graphene layer produced by CVD deposition or diamond conversion for heat spreader application. More recently, Kim, et al (N. P. Kim and J. P. Huang, “Graphene Nanoplatelet Metal Matrix,” US Pub. No. 2011/0108978, May 10, 2011) reported metal matrix infiltrated NGPs. However, metal matrix material is too heavy and the resulting metal matrix composite does not exhibit a high thermal conductivity.
Another prior art material for thermal management application is the pyrolitic graphite film. The lower portion of
Another type of pyrolytic graphite is produced by high temperature decomposition of hydrocarbon gases in vacuum followed by deposition of the carbon atoms to a substrate surface. This is essentially a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. In particular, highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) is the material produced by the application of uniaxial pressure on deposited pyrocarbon or pyrolytic graphite at very high temperatures (typically 3,000-3,300° C.). This entails a thermo-mechanical treatment of combined mechanical compression and ultra-high temperature for an extended period of time in a protective atmosphere; a very expensive, energy-intensive, and technically challenging process. The process requires high vacuum and ultra-high temperature equipment that is not only very expensive to make but also very expensive and difficult to maintain. Even with such extreme processing conditions, the resulting PG (including HOPG) still possesses many defects, grain boundaries, and mis-orientations (neighboring graphene planes not parallel to each other), resulting in less-than-satisfactory in-plane properties. Typically, the best prepared HOPG sheet or block remains far from being a graphite single crystal; instead, it typically still contains many grains or single crystals and a vast amount of grain boundaries and defects. In general, the PG or HOPG is free from any element than carbon.
Similarly, the most recently reported graphene thin film (<2 nm) prepared by catalytic CVD of hydrocarbon gas (e.g. C2H4) on Ni or Cu surface is not a single-grain crystal, but a poly-crystalline structure with many grain boundaries and defects [e.g., Piran R. Kidambi, et al., “The Parameter Space of Graphene Chemical Vapor Deposition on Polycrystalline Cu,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C2012 116 (42), 22492-22501]. With Ni or Cu being the catalyst, carbon atoms obtained via decomposition of hydrocarbon gas molecules at 800-1,000° C. are deposited onto Ni or Cu foil surface to form a sheet of single-layer or few-layer graphene that is poly-crystalline. The grains are typically much smaller than 100 μm in size and, more typically, smaller than 10 μm in size. These graphene thin films, being optically transparent and electrically conducting, are intended for touch screen (to replace indium-tin oxide or ITO glass) or semiconductor (to replace silicon, Si) applications. However, these polycrystalline graphene films are not sufficiently thermally conducting (too many grains or too much grain boundaries, and all grains being oriented in different directions) and not sufficiently thick for use as a heat spreader in an electronic device.
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide a graphene oxide (GO) gel-derived unitary or monolithic film, which exhibits a thermal conductivity comparable to or greater than that of the PG, HOPG, or CVD graphene film.
It is a specific object of the present invention to provide a GO gel-derived unitary or monolithic entity, which has the following characteristics (separately or in combination): (1) This unitary entity is an integrated graphene object that is either a graphene single crystal (single grain only) or a poly-crystal (multiple grains but having incomplete grain boundaries) with all graphene planes in all grains being essentially oriented parallel to one another (the crystallographic c-axis of all grains being essentially parallel to one another). (2) This integrated graphene entity is not an aggregate or stack of multiple discrete graphite flakes or discrete platelets of graphene or GO, and does not contain any discernible or discrete flake/platelet. (3) This integrated graphene entity is not made by gluing or bonding discrete flakes/platelets together with a binder, linker, or adhesive. Instead, GO molecules in the GO gel are merged, mainly edge-to-edge through joining or forming of covalent bonds with one another, into an integrated graphene entity, without using any externally added linker or binder molecules or polymers. (4) This unitary or monolithic graphene entity (a single crystal or poly-crystal with all graphene planes having crystallographic c-axis essentially parallel to each other) is derived from a GO gel, which is in turn obtained from heavy oxidation of natural graphite or artificial graphite particles originally having multiple graphite crystallites. Prior to being chemically oxidized to become GO gel, these starting graphite crystallites have an initial length (La in the crystallographic a-axis direction), initial width (Lb in the b-axis direction), and thickness (Lc in the c-axis direction). This unitary graphene entity typically has a length or width significantly greater than the La and Lb of the original crystallites.
The present invention also provides a method or process for producing such a GO gel-derived unitary or monolithic graphene entity, or a graphene single crystal (including a graphene poly-crystal with an incomplete grain boundary). The process begins with preparation of a mass of GO gel preferably in a layer form (preferably less than 10 mm in thickness, more preferably less than 1 mm, and most preferably less than 500 μm in thickness prior to drying). The liquid component of this GO gel is then partially or totally removed and, concurrently or sequentially, this GO layer is thermally converted to an integrated graphene film obtained by heat-treating graphene oxide gel to chemically merge individual graphene oxide molecules primarily in an edge-to-edge manner.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a cost-effective process of producing GO-derived graphene monolith that exhibits a combination of exceptional thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, surface hardness, and scratch resistance unmatched by any thin-film graphitic material of comparable thickness range.
In particular, the present invention provides a process for producing a unitary or monolithic graphene layer or graphene single crystal from a GO gel. This process does not involve or require an ultrahigh temperature as is absolutely required of the processes for producing pyrolytic graphite (including HOPG) from either carbonized polymers (e.g. polyimide) or using the CVD deposition. The presently invented process is simple, less energy-intensive, and highly scalable.
This thermally and electrically conductive graphene monolith can be used for thermal management applications (e.g. for use as a heat spreader) in a microelectronic device, such as a mobile phone (including a smart phone), a notebook computer, a tablet, an e-book, a telecommunication device, and any hand-held computing device or portable microelectronic device.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a GO-derived unitary graphene entity that exhibits a combination of exceptional thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, surface smoothness, surface hardness, and scratch resistance unmatched by any thin-film material of comparable thickness range.
It is a specific object of the present invention to provide a highly conductive graphene monolith thin-film sheet that meets the following technical requirements (a) in-plane thermal conductivity greater than 600 W/mK (preferably greater than 1,000 W/mK, and further preferably greater than 1,700 W/mK); (b) in-plane electrical conductivity greater than 2,000 S/cm (preferably >3,000 S/cm, more preferably >5,000 S/cm, and most desirably >10,000 S/cm); (c) Rockwell surface hardness value >60 (preferably >80); and/or (d) a tensile strength greater than 10 MPa (preferably >40 MPa, more preferably >60 MPa, and most preferably >100 MPa).
The present invention provides a unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal containing closely packed and bonded parallel graphene planes having an inter-graphene plane spacing of 0.335 to 0.40 nm and an oxygen content of 0.01% to 10% by weight. This unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal is obtained from heat-treating a graphene oxide gel at a temperature higher than 100° C., wherein an average mis-orientation angle between two graphene planes is less than 10 degrees, preferably and typically less than 5 degrees. The thickness of this unitary graphene entity or graphene single crystal is typically greater than 1 nm, and more typically greater than 10 nm (optically opaque), and further more typically greater than 10 μm for thermal management applications.
The graphene single crystal herein refers to the single-grain or single-domain graphene or poly-crystalline structure (but having an incomplete grain boundary) in which all the graphene planes in all grain(s) are essentially parallel to one another.
The graphene oxide gel-derived unitary or monolithic graphene layer or graphene single crystal has a unique combination of outstanding thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, scratch resistance, and elimination of the possibility of having surface graphite flakes or particles to “flake off” (actually, there is no discrete flake/platelet to be peeled therefrom).
The graphene oxide (GO) gel-derived unitary or monolithic entity has the following characteristics (separately or in combination):
The graphene oxide-derived monolithic graphene layer preferably has a thickness less than 200 μm for a heat spreader application, but it can be thicker. Further preferably, the monolithic graphene layer or graphene single crystal has a thickness greater than 1 μm, but less than 200 μm. In some applications, the thickness is preferably greater than 10 μm. The thickness range of 20-100 μm is particularly useful for mobile device thermal management applications.
The unitary graphene sheet of the present invention has overcome all the major problems associated with the flexible graphite foil produced by re-compression of exfoliated graphite worms or exfoliated graphite flakes of natural graphite and/or artificial graphite. The flexible graphite sheet or foil prepared by re-compressing (e.g. roll-pressing) exfoliated graphite worms or flakes has a great tendency to flake off, emitting graphite flakes into air and eventually relocating to a dangerous spot (e.g. where the presence of graphite flakes could cause internal short-circuiting). Further, flexible graphite sheets or foils are relatively brittle and weak, and hence are difficult to handle in an actual microelectronic device manufacturing environment. They also do not possess high thermal conductivity (most typically <300 W/mK). These and other major issues associated with the use of flexible graphite sheets in a microelectronic device for a thermal management purpose have been effectively overcome surprisingly by the presently invented unitary graphene body.
The unitary graphene sheet is derived from a graphene oxide gel, which is produced from particles of natural graphite or artificial graphite composed of multiple graphite crystallites. These crystallites typically have an initial length La (in the crystallographic a-axis direction) of less than 100 μm (more typically less than 10 μm), an initial width Lb in the b-axis direction also of more typically less than 10 μm, and a thickness Lc in the c-axis direction (typically 0.2 to 10 μm). However, the presently invented GO-derived unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal typically has a length or width at least greater than twice (more typically significantly greater than 3 times) the initial La or twice (more typically >3 times) the Lb of the graphite crystallites of the starting materials. The unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal typically has a length or width no less than 10 μm, more typically no less than 100 μm, and even more typically no less than 1 cm. They often are extended to cover the entire width of the original GO gel layer deposited on a substrate surface, which can be >100 cm as desired.
As a preferred processing condition for the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal, the heat-treating temperature for GO is from 100° C. to 1,000° C. and the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal has a thermal conductivity greater than 600 W/mK or electrical conductivity greater than 2,000 S/cm. Alternatively, the heat-treating temperature is from 1,000° C. to 1,500° C. and the resulting unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal typically has a thermal conductivity greater than 1,300 W/mK or electrical conductivity greater than 3,000 S/cm. With a heat-treating temperature of from 1500° C. to 2,500° C., the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal has a thermal conductivity greater than 1,600 W/mK or electrical conductivity greater than 5,000 S/cm (or even >8,000 S/cm). With a heat-treating temperature of from 2,500° C. to 3,250° C., the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal has a thermal conductivity greater than 1,700 W/mK or electrical conductivity greater than 8,000 S/cm (typically greater than 10,000 S/cm and, in many cases, greater than 15,000 S/cm).
The unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal can have a thickness as low as 1 nm, but preferably >10 nm, more preferably >1 μm, even more preferably >10 μm. For use as a heat spreader, the thickness is typically in the range of 10-200 μm, but most typically or desirably between 20 and 100 μm. As indicated earlier, the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal typically has a lateral dimension (length or width) significantly greater than 100 μm.
The unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal typically has an oxygen content from 0.01% to 5% by weight, more typically from 0.01% to 2% by weight. If the re-graphitization temperature exceeds 2,000° C. and is conducted under very strict protective atmosphere or extremely high vacuum conditions, one can essentially eliminate oxygen.
For the preparation of the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal, the graphene oxide gel is composed of graphene oxide molecules dispersed in an acidic medium having a pH value of no higher than 5 and the graphene oxide molecules have an oxygen content no less than 20% by weight while in a gel state.
The GO gel is obtained by immersing a graphitic material in a powder or fibrous form (e.g. natural or artificial graphite powder or graphite fibers) in an oxidizing liquid medium in a reaction vessel at a reaction temperature for a length of time sufficient to obtain a graphene oxide gel composed of graphene oxide molecules dispersed in the liquid medium. The graphene oxide molecules preferably and typically have an oxygen content no less than 20% by weight (typically 20%-46% by weight of oxygen) and a molecular weight less than 43,000 g/mole while in a gel state. Preferably, graphene oxide molecules have a molecular weight less than 4,000 g/mole while in a gel state, more preferably between 200 g/mole and 4,000 g/mole while in a gel state.
The unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal is produced by depositing a layer of graphene oxide gel onto a surface of a substrate and removing the residual liquid from this layer of deposited graphene oxide gel. This is followed by subjecting this graphene-oxide layer to a heat treatment temperature of at least 100-150° C. for thermal reduction and/or re-graphitization. A good heat treatment temperature is from 300° C. to 1,500° C. for re-graphitization. Although not required, the heat treatment temperature may be higher than 1,500° C. for re-graphitization, or may be in the range of from 1,500° C. to 2,500° C. A temperature higher than 2,500° C. may be used if so desired.
The starting materials for the preparation of graphene oxide gel include a graphitic material selected from natural graphite, artificial graphite, mesophase carbon, mesophase pitch, mesocarbon microbead, soft carbon, hard carbon, coke, carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, or a combination thereof.
The unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal with a thickness greater than 200 μm shows a surprisingly high Rockwell hardness value, typically greater than 60 and often greater than 100. This is unprecedented since prior art flexible graphite foil, pyrolytic graphite, or bulk graphite does not show such a high hardness.
The unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal of the present invention can exhibit an electrical conductivity greater than 1,500 S/cm, a thermal conductivity greater than 600 W/mK, a physical density greater than 1.8 g/cm3, and/or a tensile strength greater than 40 MPa.
With a higher re-graphitization temperature, the graphene monolithic can have an electrical conductivity greater than 3,000 S/cm, a thermal conductivity greater than 1,000 W/mK, a physical density greater than 2.0 g/cm3, and/or a tensile strength greater than 80 MPa. It can even exhibit an electrical conductivity greater than 5,000 S/cm, a thermal conductivity greater than 1,500 W/mK, a physical density greater than 2.1 g/cm3, and/or a tensile strength greater than 100 MPa.
The present invention also provides a process for producing the aforementioned unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal. The process comprises: (a) preparing a graphene oxide gel having graphene oxide molecules dispersed in a fluid medium, wherein the graphene oxide gel is optically transparent or translucent; (b) depositing a layer of the graphene oxide gel onto a surface of a supporting substrate to form a deposited graphene oxide gel thereon; (c) partially or completely removing the fluid medium from the deposited graphene oxide gel layer to form a graphene oxide layer; and (d) heat-treating the graphene oxide layer to form the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal. The process further comprises a step of compressing the graphene oxide layer (e.g. via roll-pressing through a set or multiple sets of rollers).
In particular, the graphene oxide gel is prepared by immersing a graphitic material in a powder or fibrous form in an oxidizing liquid to form an initially optically opaque suspension in a reaction vessel at a reaction temperature for a length of time sufficient to obtain a graphene oxide gel that is optically transparent or translucent. The graphene oxide gel is composed of graphene oxide molecules dispersed in an acidic medium having a pH value of no higher than 5 and the graphene oxide molecules have an oxygen content no less than 20% by weight (typically from 20% to approximately 46% by weight.
Typically, the graphene oxide gel is prepared by immersing a graphitic material in an oxidizing agent to form an initially optically opaque suspension and allowing an oxidizing reaction to proceed until an optically transparent or translucent solution is formed. The graphitic material is selected from natural graphite, artificial graphite, mesophase carbon, mesophase pitch, mesocarbon microbead, soft carbon, hard carbon, coke, carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, or a combination thereof.
The process is preferably a roll-to-roll process, wherein steps (b) and (c) include feeding a sheet of a solid substrate material from a roller to a deposition zone, depositing a layer of graphene oxide gel onto a surface of the sheet of solid substrate material to form a graphene oxide gel layer thereon, drying the graphene oxide gel to form a dried graphene oxide layer deposited on the substrate surface, and collecting graphene oxide layer-deposited substrate sheet on a collector roller. The process preferably includes an additional step of compressing the graphene oxide layer prior to being collected on the collector roller.
This graphene oxide gel has the characteristics that it is optically transparent or translucent and visually homogeneous with no discernible discrete graphene or graphene oxide sheets dispersed therein. In contrast, conventional suspension of discrete graphene or graphene oxide sheets, or graphite flakes looks opaque, dark, black or heavy brown in color with individual graphene sheets, graphene oxide sheets, or graphite flakes being discernible or recognizable with naked eyes.
The graphene oxide molecules dissolved in the liquid medium of a graphene oxide gel are aromatic chains that have an average number of benzene rings in the chain typically less than 1000, more typically less than 500, and most typically less than 100. Most of the molecules have more than 5 or 6 benzene rings (mostly >10 benzene rings) from combined atomic force microscopy, high-resolution TEM, and molecular weight measurements. These benzene-ring type of aromatic molecules have been heavily oxidized and contain functional groups, such as —COOH and —OH and, therefore, are “soluble” (not just dispersible) in polar solvents, such as water.
These soluble molecules behave like resins and are surprisingly capable of forming a coherent layer of graphene oxide of good structural integrity and high thermal conductivity. By contrast, conventional discrete graphene or graphene oxide sheets and graphite flakes do not have any self-adhesion or cohesion power. These sheets or flakes would just form a loosely packed mass of un-bonded particles that does not have any structural integrity.
The present invention also provides a heat spreader or heat sink product for use in a hand-held device, such as a power tool, a microelectronic or telecommunication device (e.g. mobile phone, tablet, laptop computer, LCD display, etc), a light-emitting diode (LED) lighting device or system. The light weight (lower density compared to metal and ceramic materials), exceptional thermal conductivity, relatively high structural integrity, superior surface hardness and scratch resistance, and eliminated or significantly reduced tendency to emit free graphite or carbon particles into air make the invented graphene oxide-coated graphitic layer an ideal thermal management material.
In summary, the present invention provides a unitary graphene layer for heat-spreading applications. In one preferred embodiment, this graphene monolith contains closely packed, gap-free, and chemically bonded parallel graphene planes that have an inter-graphene plane spacing of 0.335 to 0.50 nm (more typically 0.336 to 0.50 nm) and an oxygen content less than 1% by weight. The unitary graphene layer typically has a thickness greater than 10 nm, contains no discrete graphite flake or graphene platelet dispersed therein, and has an average mis-orientation angle between two graphene planes less than 10 degrees. This graphene monolith is obtained from heat-treating a graphene oxide gel at a temperature higher than 500° C.
Another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a unitary graphene layer (particularly useful for heat-spreading applications) that contains closely packed and chemically bonded parallel graphene planes having an inter-graphene plane spacing of 0.335 to 0.50 nm and an oxygen content less than 1% by weight (typically from 0.001% to 1%). This unitary graphene layer or monolith contains a poly-crystal or poly-grain structure that has an incomplete grain boundary, contains no discrete graphite flake or graphene platelet dispersed therein, and is obtained from heat-treating a graphene oxide gel at a temperature higher than 500° C.
The present invention provides a unitary graphene layer (graphene monolith) or graphene single crystal containing closely packed and chemically bonded graphene planes that run essentially parallel to each other. These graphene planes cover a wide area with the length and width capable of being extended to cover the entire specimen length or width. This graphene monolith has an inter-graphene plane spacing of 0.335 to 0.40 nm as determined by X-ray diffraction, and an oxygen content of 0.01% to 10% by weight. This unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal is obtained from heat-treating a graphene oxide gel at a temperature higher than 100° C., typically higher than 150° C., and more typically in the range of 1,000° C. to 1,500° C. Although not necessary, the heat treatment temperature can go above 1,500° C., even above 2,500° C. The average miss-orientation angle between two graphene planes in this graphene monolith is less than 10 degrees, preferably and typically less than 5 degrees. Most of the graphene layers are essentially parallel to one another with zero mis-orientation angle. In contrast, the mis-orientation angles in conventional flexible graphite sheets are significantly higher than 10 degrees.
The graphene oxide (GO) gel-derived unitary or monolithic entity has the following characteristics (separately or in combination):
The aforementioned features are further described and explained in details as follows:
As illustrated in
The graphite crystallite structure is usually characterized in terms of two axes or directions: the c-axis direction and the a-axis (or b-axis) direction. The c-axis is the direction perpendicular to the basal planes. The a- or b-axes are the directions parallel to the basal planes (perpendicular to the c-axis direction).
A highly ordered graphite particle can consist of crystallites of a considerable size, having a length of La along the crystallographic a-axis direction, a width of Lb along the crystallographic b-axis direction, and a thickness Lc along the crystallographic c-axis direction. The constituent graphene planes of a crystallite are highly aligned or oriented with respect to each other and, hence, these anisotropic structures give rise to many properties that are highly directional. For instance, the thermal and electrical conductivity of a crystallite are of great magnitude along the plane directions (a- or b-axis directions), but relatively low in the perpendicular direction (c-axis). As illustrated in the upper-left portion of
Due to the weak van der Waals forces holding the parallel graphene layers, natural graphite can be treated so that the spacing between the graphene layers can be appreciably opened up so as to provide a marked expansion in the c-axis direction, and thus form an expanded graphite structure in which the laminar character of the carbon layers is substantially retained. The process for manufacturing flexible graphite is well-known and the typical practice is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,404,061 to Shane et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In general, flakes of natural graphite (e.g. 100 in
The upper left portion of
In one prior art process, the exfoliated graphite (or mass of graphite worms) is re-compressed by using a calendering or roll-pressing technique to obtain flexible graphite foils (26 in
Largely due to these mis-orientations of graphite flakes and the presence of defects, commercially available flexible graphite foils normally have an in-plane electrical conductivity of 1,000-3,000 S/cm, through-plane (thickness-direction or Z-direction) electrical conductivity of 15-30 S/cm, in-plane thermal conductivity of 140-300 W/mK, and through-plane thermal conductivity of approximately 10-30 W/mK. These defects and mis-orientations are also responsible for the low mechanical strength (e.g. defects are potential stress concentration sites where cracks are preferentially initiated). These properties are inadequate for many thermal management applications and the present invention is made to address these issues.
In another prior art process, the exfoliated graphite worm 24 may be impregnated with a resin and then compressed and cured to form a flexible graphite composite 28, which is normally of low strength as well. In addition, upon resin impregnation, the electrical and thermal conductivity of the graphite worms could be reduced by two orders of magnitude.
The exfoliated graphite may be subjected to high-intensity mechanical shearing/separation treatments using a high-intensity air jet mill, high-intensity ball mill, or ultrasonic device to produce separated nano graphene platelets 33 (NGPs) with all the graphene platelets thinner than 100 nm, mostly thinner than 10 nm, and, in many cases, being single-layer graphene (also illustrated as 112 in
With a low-intensity shearing, graphite worms tend to be separated into the so-called “expanded graphite (108 in
For the purpose of defining the geometry and orientation of an NGP, the NGP is described as having a length (the largest dimension), a width (the second largest dimension), and a thickness. The thickness is the smallest dimension, which is no greater than 100 nm, preferably smaller than 10 nm in the present application. When the platelet is approximately circular in shape, the length and width are referred to as diameter. In the presently defined NGPs, both the length and width can be smaller than 1 μm, but can be larger than 200 μm.
A mass of multiple NGPs (including single-layer and/or few-layer graphene sheets, 33 in
The precursor to the unitary graphene layer is graphene oxide (GO) gel. This gel is obtained by immersing a graphitic material 20 in a powder or fibrous form in a strong oxidizing liquid in a reaction vessel to form a suspension or slurry, which initially is optically opaque. This optical opacity reflects the fact that, at the outset of the oxidizing reaction, the discrete graphite flakes and, at a later stage, the discrete graphene oxide flakes scatter visible wavelengths, resulting in an opaque and generally dark fluid mass. If the reaction between graphite powder and the oxidizing agent is allowed to proceed at a sufficiently high reaction temperature for a sufficient length of time, this opaque suspension is transformed into a translucent or transparent solution, which is now a homogeneous fluid called “graphene oxide gel” (21 in
In other words, this graphene oxide gel is optically transparent or translucent and visually homogeneous with no discernible discrete flakes/platelets of graphite, graphene, or graphene oxide dispersed therein. In contrast, conventional suspension of discrete graphene sheets, graphene oxide sheets, and expanded graphite flakes look dark, black or heavy brown in color with individual graphene or graphene oxide sheets or expanded graphite flakes discernible or recognizable even with naked eyes or a low-magnification light microscope (100×-1,000×).
The graphene oxide molecules dissolved in the liquid medium of a graphene oxide gel are aromatic chains that have an average number of benzene rings in the chain typically less than 1,000, more typically less than 500, and many less than 100. Most of the molecules have more than 5 or 6 benzene rings (mostly >10 benzene rings) from combined atomic force microscopy, high-resolution TEM, and molecular weight measurements. Based on our elemental analysis, these benzene-ring type of aromatic molecules are heavily oxidized, containing a high concentration of functional groups, such as —COOH and —OH and, therefore, are “soluble” (not just dispersible) in polar solvents, such as water. The estimated molecular weight of these graphene oxide polymers in the gel state is typically between 200 g/mole and 43,000 g/mole, more typically between 400 g/mole and 21,500 g/mole, and most typically between 400 g/mole and 4,000 g/mole.
These soluble molecules behave like polymers and are surprisingly capable of reacting and getting chemically connected with one another to form a unitary graphene layer of good structural integrity and high thermal conductivity. Conventional discrete graphene sheets, graphene oxide sheets, or graphite flakes do not have any self-reacting or cohesive bonding capability.
Specifically and most significantly, these graphene oxide molecules present in a GO gel state are capable of chemically merging with one another and getting integrated into extremely long and wide graphene layers (e.g.
It may be noted that the presently invented graphene single crystal is fundamentally different and patently distinct from the catalytic CVD graphene thin film in terms of chemical composition, micro-structure, morphology, process of production, all chemical and physical properties, and intended applications:
The unitary graphene layer can be used alone as a heat spreader in an electronic device. Alternatively, this unitary graphene layer can be a coating layer of a two-layer or multi-layer structure. In other words, a layer of graphene oxide-derived unitary graphene entity may be coated onto one or two primary surfaces of a substrate or core layer of a graphitic material, forming a 2-layer or 3-layer structure. The graphitic core or substrate layer has two primary surfaces on the opposite sides of the layer. If one of the primary surfaces is coated with a layer of GO-derived unitary graphene, we have a 2-layer laminate. If both primary surfaces are coated with GO, we have a 3-layer laminate. One may further deposit a layer of protective material on a unitary graphene coating layer to make a 4-layer laminate, for instance. This protective layer can be an electrically insulating resin layer for certain applications, e.g. for transferring heat from a CPU of a mobile phone or laptop computer to the GO coating layer so that the GO coating can help dissipate the heat generated by the CPU. The electrically insulating layer is essential to preventing internal shorting. Further optionally, another layer of material (e.g. a thermal interface material) can be deposited onto the opposite side of this 4-layer laminate to make a 5-layer structure.
The unitary graphene-coated laminate preferably has a thickness no greater than 1 mm, further preferably less than 200 μm, and most preferably less than 100 μm. More preferably, the thickness is greater than 10 μm, further preferably between 10 and 100 μm, and most preferably between 10 μm and 50 μm. A thickness less than 10 μm would make it difficult to handle the laminate when attempting to incorporate pieces of the laminate in a device for thermal management applications (e.g. as a heat spreader in a microelectronic device).
In a special case of using graphene-based graphitic core layer, the constituent graphene sheets (NGPs) preferably contain multi-layer graphene sheets preferably having a thickness of 3.35 nm to 33.5 nm. Preferably, the resulting graphitic core layer has a thickness no greater than 100 μm, more preferably less than 50 μm. When multi-layer graphene sheets have a thickness of 6.7 nm to 20 nm, one can readily produce a graphitic core layer having an exceptional thermal conductivity.
The graphene-based graphitic core layer desirably contains pristine graphene containing no oxygen. The pristine graphene can be obtained from direct ultrasonication without involving oxidation of a graphitic material. As shown in the upper portion of
The GO coating material, when in a gel state, typically has an oxygen content of 20-46% by weight. After being deposited onto a primary surface of a graphitic core layer to form a laminate, the subsequent heat treatment process naturally reduces the oxygen content to typically 0.01-10% by weight, more typically 0.01%-5%.
The graphene oxide is obtained from a graphene oxide gel, which gel is composed of graphene oxide molecules dispersed in an acidic medium having a pH value of no higher than 5 and the graphene oxide molecules have an oxygen content no less than 20% by weight. In particular, the gel is obtained by immersing a graphitic material in a powder or fibrous form in an oxidizing liquid in a reaction vessel at a reaction temperature for a length of time sufficient to obtain a graphene oxide gel composed of graphene oxide molecules dispersed in an acidic liquid medium having a pH value of no higher than 5 and the graphene oxide molecules have an oxygen content no less than 20% by weight. As indicated in
The starting graphitic material for the purpose of forming graphene oxide gel may be selected from natural graphite, artificial graphite, mesophase carbon, mesophase pitch, mesocarbon microbead, soft carbon, hard carbon, coke, carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, or a combination thereof. The graphitic material is preferably in a powder or short filament form having a dimension lower than 20 μm, more preferably lower than 10 μm, further preferably smaller than 5 μm, and most preferably smaller than 1 μm.
Using artificial graphite with an average particle size of 9.7 μm as an example, a typical procedure involves dispersing graphite particles in an oxidizer mixture of sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and potassium permanganate (at a weight ratio of 3:1:0.05) at a temperature of typically 0-60° C. for typically at least 3 days, preferably 5 days, and more preferably 7 days or longer. The average molecular weight of the resulting graphene oxide molecules in a gel is approximately 20,000-40,000 g/mole if the treatment time is 3 days, <10,000 g/mole if 5 days, and <4,000 g/mole if longer than 7 days. The required gel formation time is dependent upon the particle size of the original graphitic material, a smaller size requiring a shorter time. It is of fundamental significance to note that if the critical gel formation time is not reached, the suspension of graphite powder and oxidizer (graphite particles dispersed in the oxidizer liquid) appears completely opaque, meaning that discrete graphite particles or flakes remain suspended (but not dissolved) in the liquid medium. As soon as this critical time is exceeded, the whole suspension becomes optically translucent or transparent, meaning that the heavily oxidized graphite completely loses its original graphite identity and the resulting graphene oxide molecules are completely dissolved in the oxidizer liquid, forming a homogeneous solution (no longer just a suspension or slurry).
It must be further noted that if the suspension or slurry, with a treatment time being shorter than the required gel formation time, is rinsed and dried, we would simply recover a graphite oxide powder or graphite intercalation compound (GIC) powder, which can be exfoliated and separated to produce nano graphene platelets (NGPs). Without an adequate amount of a strong oxidizing agent and an adequate duration of oxidation time, the graphite or graphite oxide particles would not be converted into the GO gel state.
Hence, the NGPs (for use in a graphitic core layer) may be produced by subjecting a graphitic material to a combined treatment of oxidation, exfoliation, and separation. This graphitic material may also be selected from natural graphite, artificial graphite, mesophase carbon, mesophase pitch, mesocarbon microbead, soft carbon, hard carbon, coke, carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, or a combination thereof. The NGPs can also be produced from a process such as (a) direct ultrasonication, (b) potassium melt intercalation and water/alcohol-induced exfoliation, or (c) supercritical fluid intercalation/exfoliation/separation of non-oxidized graphitic material. These processes produce pristine graphene that contains no oxygen.
The graphene oxide-derived unitary graphene-coated laminate of the present invention typically has a thermal conductivity greater than 800 W/mK, more typically greater than 1,000 W/mK (even when the film thickness is greater than 10 μm) and often greater than 1,700 W/mK. This latter valve is typically obtained when the graphitic core layer is relatively thin compared to the unitary graphene coating layers and when the final heat treatment temperature is higher than 2,500° C. The coated laminate typically has an electrical conductivity greater than 3,000 S/cm (even >10,000 S/cm). This high electrical conductivity (greater than 3000 S/cm and up to 20,000 S/cm) can be achieved concurrently with a thermal conductivity greater than 1,000 W/mK (up to 1,900 W/mK). Quite often, the unitary graphene-coated laminate can exhibit a combination of a high electrical conductivity (greater than 1,500 S/cm), a high thermal conductivity (greater than 600 W/mK), a relatively high physical density (greater than 1.4 g/cm3), and a relatively high tensile strength (greater than 10 MPa, often >40 MPa, and can be >120 MPa). The unitary graphene layer-coated laminates also exhibit an exceptional surface hardness and scratch resistance, eliminating the tendency for a graphitic core foil (particularly flexible graphite foil and recompressed graphene platelet foil) to flake off (to emit free carbon or graphite particles into air).
Quite surprisingly, in many samples, the unitary graphene layer-coated laminate has an electrical conductivity greater than 2,000 S/cm, a thermal conductivity greater than 800 W/mK, a physical density greater than 1.8 g/cm3, and a tensile strength greater than 40 MPa. This combination of superior properties has not been achieved with any graphite or non-graphite material. In some cases, the coated laminate exhibits an electrical conductivity greater than 3,000 S/cm (up to 20,000 S/cm), a thermal conductivity greater than 1,500 W/mK (up to 1,900 W/mK), a physical density greater than 2.0 g/cm3, and a tensile strength greater than 40 MPa (up to 120 MPa). This type of graphene oxide-coated laminate may be used as a heat spreader component in a portable device.
The present invention also provides a process for producing a unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal. The process comprises: (a) preparing a graphene oxide gel having graphene oxide molecules dispersed in a fluid medium, wherein the graphene oxide gel is optically transparent or translucent; (b) depositing a layer of the graphene oxide gel onto a surface of a supporting substrate to form a deposited graphene oxide gel thereon; (c) partially or completely removing the fluid medium from the deposited graphene oxide gel layer to form a graphene oxide layer; and (d) heat-treating the graphene oxide layer to form the unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal. The process may advantageously further comprise a step of compressing the graphene oxide layer before, during, and/or after the heat-treating step.
The graphene oxide gel is prepared by immersing a graphitic material in a powder or fibrous form in an oxidizing liquid to form an initially optically opaque suspension in a reaction vessel at a reaction temperature for a length of time sufficient to obtain a graphene oxide gel that is optically transparent or translucent, wherein the graphene oxide gel is composed of graphene oxide molecules dispersed in an acidic medium having a pH value of no higher than 5 and the graphene oxide molecules have an oxygen content no less than 20% by weight. The starting material for the preparation of GO gel is a graphitic material selected from natural graphite, artificial graphite, mesophase carbon, mesophase pitch, mesocarbon microbead, soft carbon, hard carbon, coke, carbon fiber, carbon nanofiber, carbon nanotube, or a combination thereof.
In the process, steps (b) and (c) may advantageously include feeding a sheet of a solid substrate material from a roller to a deposition zone, depositing a layer of graphene oxide gel onto a surface of the sheet of solid substrate material to form a graphene oxide gel layer thereon, drying the graphene oxide gel to form a dried graphene oxide layer deposited on the substrate surface, and collecting graphene oxide layer-deposited substrate sheet on a collector roller. This is essentially a roll-to-roll process that is amenable to continuous mass production of unitary graphene materials. The process may further comprise a step of compressing the graphene oxide layer prior to being collected on the collector roller.
In the process, the graphene oxide gel may be deposited onto a primary surface of a supporting substrate using any coating, casting, spraying, or liquid-dispensing process. Upon removal of the liquid medium from the coating layer, the resulting coated laminate is then subjected to a thermal treatment or re-graphitization treatment (typically 100-1000° C., but can be higher), which allows individual graphene oxide molecules to chemically bond to one another. This thermal treatment surprisingly enables or activates the re-joining, polymerization, or chain-growth of otherwise small graphene oxide molecules, resulting in removal of non-carbon elements (e.g. all H and most O) and formation of huge graphene sheets. It appears that the graphene oxide molecules can be merged and integrated into several unitary graphene layers that run parallel to one another and these graphene layers can cover the entire length of the coating layer without interruption. In other words, these graphene layers are each a complete unitary graphene entity. These complete unitary graphene layers actually constitute one unitary entity that is essentially a graphene block with all graphene planes being oriented along one single direction (e.g. as schematically shown in
The unitary graphene layer of the present invention is often a single crystal (as schematically shown in
This unitary body (or “single crystal”) of highly oriented graphene planes exhibits an unprecedented combination of exceptional thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, structural integrity (strength and ease of handling). These properties are unmatched by any graphitic or non-graphitic material.
The thermal treatment process can be assisted with a calendering or roll-pressing operation to help improve the surface finish of the resulting coated laminate. The unitary graphene layer thickness can be less than 10 μm, but preferably between 10 μm and 200 μm, and most preferably between 20 μm and 100 μm.
As indicated above, flexible graphite foils prepared by re-compression of exfoliated graphite flakes or graphite worms exhibit relatively low thermal conductivity and mechanical strength. The graphite worms can be formed into flexible graphite foils by compression, without the use of any binding material, presumably due to the mechanical interlocking between the voluminously expanded graphite flakes. Although a significant proportion of these flakes are oriented in a direction largely parallel to the opposing surfaces of a flexible graphite sheet (as evidenced by the high degree of anisotropy with respect to thermal and electrical conductivity), many other flakes are distorted, kinked, bent over, or oriented in a direction non-parallel to these sheet surfaces (
As a consequence, the electrical or thermal conductivity of the resulting flexible graphite foils dramatically deviates from what would be expected of a perfect graphite single crystal or a graphene layer. For instance, the theoretical in-plane electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity of a graphene layer are predicted to be 1-5×104 S/cm and 3,000-5,000 W/(mK), respectively. However, the actual corresponding values for flexible graphite foils are 1-3×103 S/cm and 140-300 W/(mK), respectively; one order of magnitude lower than what could be achieved. By contrast, the corresponding values for the presently invented unitary graphene-coated graphitic foil are approximately 3.5-20×103 S/cm (3,500-20,000 S/cm) and 600-2,000 W/(mK), respectively.
The present invention also provides a highly thermally conductive unitary graphene layer or unitary graphene-coated laminate that can be used for thermal management applications; e.g. for use as a heat spreader in a microelectronic device (such as mobile phone, notebook computer, e-book, and tablet), flexible display, light-emitting diode (LED), power tool, computer CPU, and power electronics. We are filing separate patent applications to claim the various products or applications of the presently invented GO-coated graphitic laminates.
Chopped graphite fibers with an average diameter of 12 μm was used as a starting material, which was immersed in a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and potassium permanganate (as the chemical intercalate and oxidizer) to prepare graphite intercalation compounds (GICs). The fiber segments were first dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 80° C. Then, a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid, fuming nitric acid, and potassium permanganate (at a weight ratio of 4:1:0.05) was slowly added, under appropriate cooling and stirring, to a three-neck flask containing fiber segments. After 16 hours of reaction, the acid-treated graphite fibers were filtered and washed thoroughly with deionized water until the pH level of the solution reached 6. After being dried at 100° C. overnight, the resulting graphite intercalation compound (GIC) was subjected to a thermal shock at 1050° C. for 45 seconds in a tube furnace to form exfoliated graphite (worms). Five grams of the resulting exfoliated graphite (EG) were mixed with 2,000 ml alcohol solution consisting of alcohol and distilled water with a ratio of 65:35 for 12 hours to obtain a suspension. Then the mixture or suspension was subjected to ultrasonic irradiation with a power of 200 W for various times. After two hours of sonication, EG particles were effectively fragmented into thin NGPs. The suspension was then filtered and dried at 80° C. to remove residue solvents. The as-prepared NGPs have an average thickness of approximately 9.7 nm.
Mesocarbon microbeads (MCMBs) were supplied from China Steel Chemical Co. This material has a density of about 2.24 g/cm3 with a median particle size of about 16 μm. MCMB (10 grams) were intercalated with an acid solution (sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and potassium permanganate at a ratio of 4:1:0.05) for 72 hours. Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was poured into deionized water and filtered. The intercalated MCMBs were repeatedly washed in a 5% solution of HCl to remove most of the sulphate ions. The sample was then washed repeatedly with deionized water until the pH of the filtrate was neutral. The slurry was dried and stored in a vacuum oven at 60° C. for 24 hours. The dried powder sample was placed in a quartz tube and inserted into a horizontal tube furnace pre-set at a desired temperature, 1,080° C. for 45 seconds to obtain a graphene material. TEM and atomic force microscopic studies indicate that most of the NGPs were single-layer graphene.
In a typical procedure, five grams of graphite flakes, ground to approximately 20 μm or less in sizes, were dispersed in 1,000 mL of deionized water (containing 0.1% by weight of a dispersing agent, Zonyl® FSO from DuPont) to obtain a suspension. An ultrasonic energy level of 85 W (Branson S450 Ultrasonicator) was used for exfoliation, separation, and size reduction of graphene sheets for a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours.
Graphite oxide gel was prepared by oxidation of graphite flakes with an oxidizer liquid consisting of sulfuric acid, sodium nitrate, and potassium permanganate at a ratio of 4:1:0.05 at 30° C. When natural graphite flakes (particle sizes of 14 μm) were immersed and dispersed in the oxidizer mixture liquid, the suspension or slurry appears optically opaque and dark. The suspension remains opaque during the first 52 hours of reaction. However, the suspension gradually turns optically translucent (a little cloudy) when the reaction time exceeds 52 hours, and the color of the suspension changes from black to dark brown. After 96 hours, the suspension suddenly becomes an optically transparent solution with light brown color. The solution appears very uniform in color and transparency, indicating the absence of any dispersed discrete objects. The whole solution behaves like a gel, very similar to a typical polymer gel.
Surprisingly, by casting this gel on a glass surface and removing the liquid medium from the cast film we obtain a thin film of graphene oxide that is optically transparent. This thin film looks like, feels like, and behaves like a regular polymer film. However, upon re-graphitization at a temperature (typically >100° C., more typically >1,000° C., further typically >1,500° C., and can be >2,500° C.) for typically 1-3 hours, this GO film is transformed in a unitary graphene entity comprising or being a large-size graphene single crystal. This is a free-standing unitary graphene layer, which can be implemented directly as a heat spreader in an electronic device. Alternatively, as one of the many applications, a unitary graphene layer may be deposited onto a surface of a graphitic substrate layer to form a thermally conductive laminate, described below:
By casting a layer of GO gel onto a graphitic material foil (graphite paper, film, mat, etc) and removing the liquid content from the gel, the resulting solid coating layer sticks to the graphitic foil very well. Actually, the bonding between the GO coating and the graphitic foil is very strong and, after a heat treatment, the GO-derived unitary graphene layer cannot be peeled off from the graphitic foil without tearing apart or removing some graphitic foil material. This implies that GO gel, upon re-graphitization, possesses an exceptional cohesive strength. This is a very surprising observation.
X-ray diffraction curves of a GO film (GO gel coated on a glass surface with liquid medium removed), a GO film thermally reduced at 150° C. for one hour, and a highly reduced and re-graphitized GO film (a unitary graphene layer) are shown in
The inter-graphene spacing values of GO-derived unitary graphene films obtained by heat treating at various temperatures over a wide temperature range are summarized in
With a heat treatment temperature as low as 800° C., the resulting unitary graphene layer exhibits a thermal conductivity of 1,148 W/mK, in contrast to the 244 W/mK of the flexible graphite foil with an identical heat treatment temperature. As a matter of fact, no matter how high the heat treatment temperature is (e.g. even as high as 2,800° C.), the flexible graphite foil only shows a thermal conductivity lower than 600 W/mK. At a heat treatment temperature of 2,800° C., the presently invented unitary graphene layer delivers a thermal conductivity of 1,807 W/mK.
A close scrutiny and comparison of
For comparison, we also carbonized polyimide films at 500° C. for 1 hour and at 1,000° C. for 3 hours in an inert atmosphere and then graphitized the films at a temperature in the range of 2,500-3,000° C. for 1 to 5 hours to form a conventional graphitic film, pyrolytic graphite (PG).
The above conclusion is further supported by the data in
The NGPs prepared in Examples 1-3 were made into thin paper or film form (e.g., using a vacuum-assisted filtration technique) for use as a graphitic foil. Other graphitic foils investigated include carbon nanotube paper (Bucky paper from Buckeye Composites, Inc., Dayton, Ohio), carbon nanofiber mat (CNFs supplied from Applied Sciences, Inc., Cedarville, Ohio), flexible graphite foils of several different thicknesses (supplied from Graftech and Timcal Graphite), graphite-epoxy composite films prepared in-house, carbon-carbon composite layer prepared in-house (carbon fiber mat reinforced with phenolic resin, which was then carbonized), and carbon paper (Toray). We have also prepared CNT and graphene films that are nanometers in thickness. These nano-thin films were deposited on a plastic film first (PET film, polyethylene terephthalate). PET film serves as an electrically insulating layer to electrically isolate the heat spreader layer from a CPU of a mobile phone or laptop computer.
The graphene oxide gel prepared in Example 4 was used for the preparation of graphene oxide-derived unitary graphene coating. In some cases, discrete NGPs were added into the GO gel to form a mixture gel or NGP-GO gel slurry. In these cases, fully separated NGP platelets were dispersed in graphene oxide gel to produce a graphene platelet gel with the platelet concentration of approximately 1-50% by weight (preferably 5-20% by weight NGP). Ultrasonic waves were employed to assist in the dispersion of NGPs in the gel.
Pure GO gel or NGP-GO mixture gel or slurry was then cast onto a primary surface or both primary surfaces of a graphitic foil using a coating machine equipped with drying and heating provisions. In some cases, the GO gel or NGP-GO gel mixture was casted onto a substrate and regulated by a doctor's blade to form a uniform coating thereon. The liquid in the coating was further removed in a vacuum oven to form a solid GO coating. The resulting coated graphitic foils (also referred to as coated laminates) were then subjected to a heat treatment at a temperature of from 100° C., up to approximately 3,000° C. We have utilized several temperature regimes: 100° C.-1,000° C.; 1,000° C.-1,500° C.; 1,500° C.-2,500° C.; and 2,500° C.-3,000° C.
Four-point probe tests were conducted on unitary graphene layer-coated graphitic foils (e.g. flexible graphite foil, FG), the GO-derived unitary graphene layer alone (coated on a glass surface and then peeled off and heat treated), and the FG foils alone (no coating) to measure their in-plane electrical conductivity. Their in-plane thermal conductivity was measured using a laser flash method (Netzsch Thermal Diffusivity Device).
The in-plane thermal and electrical conductivities and tensile properties of various films or laminates were investigated. Several significant observations can be made from the testing results (e.g. as summarized in
A series of GO-derived unitary graphene-coated FG foils were prepared with the coating thickness varying from approximately 10 μm to 80 μm per coating layer. The core FG foil is approximately 100 μm thick. A universal testing machine was used to determine the tensile strength of various coated laminates and their uncoated counterparts (core layer only).
The tensile strength values are plotted as a function of the coating-to-core thickness ratio,
SEM investigation of specimen fracture surfaces has shown that the failure of these foils and laminates was always initiated from the FG foil itself (not from a GO-derived unitary graphene coating layer, if present), and often from a site near a FG surface or edge. The FG surface or edge appears to have abundant surface defects that could serve as a mechanical stress concentration site, promoting crack initiation. The presence of a unitary graphene coating layer appears to be capable of significantly smoothing out the surface defects and delaying the crack initiation step. When the stress is sufficiently high, cracks are eventually initiated near the FG surface/edge, leading to final tensile failure.
Another unexpected observation is the notion that the tensile strength of the unitary graphene-coated laminate increases monotonically with the increasing unitary graphene coating amount, reaching a value of 121 MPa that is one order of magnitude higher than the typical strength of flexible graphite-type materials. This appears to suggest that GO gel has a strong adhering power capable of bonding GO to a graphitic foil and also that GO molecules in a GO gel are capable of combining/integrating with one another to form larger and stronger unitary graphene layers or single crystals that are relatively defect-free, leading to a relatively high cohesive strength.
The scratch test was conducted using the so-called Ford Lab Test Method (FLTM) BN108-13. This apparatus consists of a movable platform connected to five beams with 250 mm in length. A scratch pin is attached to one end of each beam. A highly polished hardened steel ball (1.0±0.1 mm diameter) is placed on the tip of each pin. Each pin is loaded with a weight that exerts a force of 7N, 6N, 3N, 2N, and 0.6N, respectively. Driven by compressed air, the beams draw the pins across the specimen surface and generate scratches. The scratch is made at a sliding velocity of approximately 100 mm/s. All tests were performed at room temperature. Although the test method requires that grained surfaces be evaluated, only the smooth surfaces of the specimens were tested in this study.
After the specimen plaques were scratched, they were evaluated with a reflected light polarizing microscope incorporating a Xenon light source. An image analyzer with Image Analysis Software was used to measure the “gray scale mass,” which is the total gray scale value of the object. The camera objective lens is positioned at an angle of 90° from the scratch. The objective lens then registers a portion of the scratch about 1 mm long. The electron signal for each scratch line is then integrated and recorded. The optical mass of an object, M, is the sum of the gray level values, GL, of all pixels in the object. The individual gray level values are assigned by the image analysis program in unit steps in the range of 0-255, where 0=black and 255=white. The optical mass, M, can be computed from: M=ΣGLi (sum over i to n), where n is the number of pixels. The brightness of the object, B, is B=M/A, where A represents the area of the object. The percentage change in the brightness between the scratch and the background is the scratch visibility, ΔB, given by ΔB=[(Bscratch−Bbackground)/(Bbackground)]×100%. The depth of the scratch was measured using an interferometer. The magnification was set at 5×. Depth measurements were made from the depth histogram of the scanned area. The scratches were also examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Indentation hardness tests were also performed on selected specimens. For the Rockwell Hardness test, the ASTM D 785 test procedure was followed. The indenter was a round steel ball with 12.5 mm in diameter (Rockwell R scale). The Rockwell hardness number is a measure of the non-recoverable indentation after a heavy load of 588N for a period of 15 s, and subsequently reduced to a minor load of 98N for another duration of 15 s. Normal hardness is then defined as the load divided by the projected area.
Examples of graphitic foils investigated include: NGP paper, CNT paper, CNF mat, graphite-epoxy composite films, carbon-carbon composite layer, carbon paper, GO gel-bonded NGP composite, PET-supported CNT film, and PET-supported graphene film (PET film was attached after heat treating GO coating). The physical and mechanical properties of a broad array of GO-coated graphitic foils are summarized in Table 1 below. The improvements in various properties over the core or substrate alone are due to the superior properties of the GO gel-derived unitary graphene layer or the synergistic effects between the GO gel-derived unitary graphene layer and the core/substrate layer. These exceptional properties are not observed with the core layer alone (e.g. flexible graphite), the catalytic CVD graphene film, and the pyrolytic graphite (including HOPG).
These data have further demonstrated that a GO-derived unitary graphene coating can significantly improve electric conductivity, thermal conductivity, tensile strength, scratch resistance, and hardness of a graphitic layer. The excellent scratch resistance and surface hardness also result in the reduction or elimination of any graphite or carbon particles from being scratched off the foil surface.
A comparison between Sample 21-A and 21-B and that between 22-A and 22-B reveal a very interesting and significant result. The paper or mat made from CNTs and CNFs, two presumably high-strength materials, show relatively poor strength and hardness. Presumably one could impregnate these porous paper or mat structures with a resin, but that would dramatically curtail the electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity. Instead, by coating both major surfaces of a mat or paper structure with a thin layer of GO gel and then drying and re-graphitizing the GO layer at 1,000° C. for one hour, we have observed that the tensile strengths of both materials were increased by a factor of 3-4. Furthermore, both the thermal conductivity and the electrical conductivity of both CNT paper and CNF mat were increased by one order of magnitude. These exceptional properties, alone or in combination, could not have been achieved with resin-impregnated CNT paper or CNF mat even if the resin matrix is carbonized at 1,500° C. for an extended period of time. It is well-known in the art that carbon/carbon composites, even after repeated resin impregnations and carbonizations, could not reach an electrical conductivity of 1,000 S/cm (typically <<500 S/cm) and could not reach a thermal conductivity of 1,000 W/mK (typically <<300 W/mK).
We have used an infrared thermography-based hand-help device to measure the surface temperatures of a range of microelectronic devices, such as smart phones and laptop computer. For instance,
As indicated in
For instance, polyimide (PI), if carbonized and graphitized for 5 hours (including 4 hours for carbonization at 1,000-1,500° C. andl hour for graphitization at 2,000° C.), exhibits a thermal conductivity of 820 W/mK. In contrast, we were able to reach a thermal conductivity of 876 W/mK with a heat treatment of GO at 500° C. for a total of two hours. This is very surprising and no one has ever thought that such a low graphitization temperature was possible. Further, a heat treatment of the GO-derived unitary graphene-coated graphitic foil at the same 2,000° C. for 1 hour imparts a thermal conductivity of 1,680 W/mK. Clearly, this is a dramatically faster, less energy-intensive, and more cost-effective process. The resulting products are also far superior to pyrolytic graphite. The unitary graphene-coated graphitic foil, the unitary graphene layer itself (from GO gel), and the pyrolytic graphite are three fundamentally different and patently distinct classes of materials in terms of chemical composition, morphology, structure, process of production, and various properties.
In conclusion, we have successfully developed an absolutely new, novel, unexpected, and patently distinct class of highly conducting material: graphene oxide gel-derived unitary graphene layer or graphene single crystal. The chemical composition, structure, morphology, process of production, and properties of this new class of materials are fundamentally different and patently distinct from flexible graphite foil, polymer-derived pyrolytic graphite, CVD-derived PG (including HOPG), and catalytic CVD graphene thin film. The thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, scratch resistance, surface hardness, and tensile strength exhibited by the presently invented materials are much higher than what prior art flexible graphite sheets, graphene paper, or other graphitic films could possibly achieve. These GO-derived unitary graphene materials have the best combination of excellent electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, mechanical strength, surface scratch resistance, hardness, and no tendency to flake off.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/354,706, filed on Nov. 17, 2016, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/694,356, filed on Nov. 26, 2012, the contents of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2798878 | Hummers | Jul 1957 | A |
| 4666736 | Matsumura et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 5831374 | Morita et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6771502 | Getz et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 7071258 | Jang et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7150914 | Clovesko et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7160619 | Clovesko et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166237 | Klett et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7306847 | Capp et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7385819 | Shives et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7566410 | Song et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7662321 | Guo et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 8173095 | Heer et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8574720 | Carney et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8778538 | Kung et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9360905 | Zhamu et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9363932 | Wang et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9533889 | Zhamu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 20050271574 | Jang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060035085 | Ozaki et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056157 | Ford et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20080048152 | Jang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080248275 | Jang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090087493 | Dai et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155561 | Choi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325071 | Verbrugge et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000441 | Jang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055025 | Jang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055464 | Sung | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100085713 | Balandin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128439 | Tilak et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100140792 | Haddon et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143798 | Zhamu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222482 | Jang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100255984 | Sutter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100301279 | Nesper et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110059599 | Ward et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108978 | Kim et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110159372 | Zhamu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110183180 | Yu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110186789 | Samulski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110189452 | Lettow et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110227000 | Ruoff et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247795 | Horng | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274610 | Paquette et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110280787 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110318257 | Sokolov et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120021224 | Everett et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120034442 | Pauzauskie et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120190139 | Na et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120196074 | Ago et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120205606 | Lee et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120208008 | Tour et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120211159 | Hougham et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234524 | Fan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270960 | Felisari et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272868 | Berry et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120308741 | Kim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314365 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130001068 | Zhamu et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130005917 | Zhamu et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130092229 | Kue et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130130037 | Bol et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130136684 | Wu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130181166 | Tetsuka | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190449 | Kinloch et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200300 | Hoe et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130213630 | John | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230722 | Fujii et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130236715 | Zhamu et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130264041 | Zhamu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130272951 | Hiura et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329366 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2012006657 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2016, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2017, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 nonfinal Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2016, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 nonfinal Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2017, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 Response final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 Response final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2015, 2 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 Response final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2017, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 Response final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2017, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 Response nonfinal Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2016, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,246 Response nonfinal Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2017, 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 Response to fOA dated Nov. 2, 2016, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 Response to nfOA dated Aug. 15, 2017, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 Response to nfOA dated Mar. 18, 2016, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Advisory Action dated Dec. 15, 2015, 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Final Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2017, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Nonfinal Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2015, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Nonfinal Office Action dated Jun 29, 2016, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Response to Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2017, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Response to Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2015, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated May 8, 2015, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,162 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2016, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Final OA dated Apr. 30, 2015, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Final OA dated Jan. 10, 2014, 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Final OA dated Jun. 13, 2016, 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Nonfinal OA dated Aug. 12, 2013, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Nonfinal OA dated Jul. 26, 2016, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Nonfinal OA dated Sep. 25, 2015, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Nonfinal OA dated Sep. 30, 2014, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Adv Act dated May 5, 2014, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Final OA dated Apr. 7, 2014, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Final OA dated Jul. 30, 2015, 24 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Final OA dated Jun. 14, 2016, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Nonfinal OA dated Dec. 22, 2014, 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Nonfinal OA dated Feb. 5, 2016, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Nonfinal OA dated Oct. 18, 2013, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Resp Nonfinal OA dated Sep. 12, 2016, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,356 Advisory Action dated Apr. 28, 2014, 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,468 Resp nfOA dated May 13, 2015, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,468 fOA dated Jul. 13, 2015, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,468 nfOA dated Feb. 23, 2015, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,468 Resp fOA dated Jul. 29, 2015, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Final Office Action dated dated Jun. 2, 2017, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722, Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2015, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Nonfinal Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2015, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Nonfinal Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2016, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Response to Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2016, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Response to Final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2017, 12 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2017, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,722 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2015, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,791 Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2016, 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,791 Nonfinal Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2015, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,791 Response Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2016, 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,791 Response Nonfinal Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2016, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,100 final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2016, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,100 nonfinal Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017, 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,100 Nonfinal Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2016, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,100 Response final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2017, 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,100 Response nonfinal Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2016, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/815,100 Response nonfinal Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017, 14 pages. |
| Batzill, “The Surface Science of Graphene: Metal Interfaces, CVD Synthesis, Nanonbbons, Chemical Modifications, and Defects” Surf. Sci. Rep. (2012) vol. 67, pp. 83-115. |
| Dreyer et al., “The chemistry of graphene oxide” Chem. Soc. Rev. (2010) vol. 39, pp. 228-240. |
| Gong et al., “Graphitization of Graphene Oxide with Ethanol during Thermal Reduction” J. Chem. Phys. C (2012) vol. 116, pp. 9969-9979. |
| Kidambi et al., “The Parameter Space of Graphene Chemical Vapor Deposition on Polycrystalline Cu” The Journal of Physical Chemistry (2012) vol. 116, No. 42, pp. 22492-22501. |
| Li et al., “Evolution of Graphene Growth on Ni and Cu by Carbon Isotope Labeling” Nano Letters (2009) vol. 9, pp. 4268-4272. |
| Reina et al., “Large Area, Few-Layer Graphene Films on Arbitrary Substrates by Chemical Vapor Deposition” Nano Letters (2009) vol. 9, pp. 30-35. |
| Tsen et al., “Tailoring Electrical Transport Across Grain Boundaries in Polycrystalline Graphene” Science (2012) vol. 336, pp. 1143-1146. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/385,813 Advisory Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/385,813 Final Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2016, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/385,813 Nonfinal Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2015, 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/385,813 Response to Final Office dated Apr. 22, 2016, 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/385,813 Response to Nonfinal Office Action, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2014, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Nonfinal Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Nonfinal Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2015, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Nonfinal Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Response to Final Office Action filed Feb. 19, 2015, 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2015, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,265 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2014, 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/507,167 Final Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2016, 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/507,167 Nonfinal Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2015, 14 pages |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/507,167 Response to Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2016, 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/507,167 Response to Nonfinal Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2015, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 Advisory Action dated Dec. 9, 2016, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 fOA dated Jun. 17, 2016, 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 nfOA dated Dec. 9, 2015, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/694,161 nfOA dated May 17, 2017, 28 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180135200 A1 | May 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13694356 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Child | 15354706 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15354706 | Nov 2016 | US |
| Child | 15852861 | US |
