1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to devices for handling pneumatic flow, and particularly to a heat exchanger flow balancing system incorporating means for controlling the pneumatic flow through each of the multiple tubes of a heat exchanger in order to create substantially equal flow through each tube.
2. Description of the Related Art
Heat exchangers, also known as radiators in many applications, are used in a wide variety of applications including stationary and vehicle heating and air conditioning systems, engine supercharging and turbocharging intercooler systems, power generation, and other mechanical and pneumatic systems of various types. The heat exchangers manufactured for these systems are generally relatively simply constructed, with their heat exchanging tubes all being cut from the same stock material to have the same diameters and wall thicknesses. Generally, a single header or entry plenum is provided, with this plenum having a single relatively large diameter inlet with a relatively large number of equal diameter heat exchanger tubes extending to an outlet plenum with its single large diameter outlet or exhaust tube. The inlet and outlet tubes may connect to their respective plenums at either end of the plenum or at some point at or near the center of the plenum, or perhaps at some other location on the plenum depending upon manufacturing considerations, physical constraints for the intended installation, and perhaps other factors.
The problem with such equal tube diameter heat exchangers is that the fluid flow varies to each of the individual tubes, depending upon the distance of the tube inlet from the larger single intake tube of the plenum (and perhaps other factors as well, such as any changes in direction of airflow from the inlet tube to the individual heat exchanger tubes). Much the same problem can occur at the outlet plenum as well. This can result in significant variation in the fluid flow through the heat exchanger tubes located at some distance from the large intake tube, in comparison to those heat exchanger tubes having their inlets adjacent to the inflow from the single large intake tube. The result is that the heat exchanger is far less efficient than it might otherwise be, if the fluid flow were at least close to equal through each of the individual heat exchanger tubes.
Innumerable heat exchanger and radiator configurations have been developed in the past, as noted further above. An example of such is found in German Patent Publication No. 2,209,684 published on Sep. 13, 1973 to Karl Heinkel Apparatebau KG. This reference describes a heat exchanger having a two-way flow path contained within a single plenum, with the two flow directions separated by an internal wall. A series of tubes extend from the inlet side of the plenum, with these tubes contained concentrically within larger diameter tubes. Fluid flowing into the inlet side and through the smaller diameter tubes leaves the smaller tubes at their open distal ends, flowing into the surrounding larger diameter tubes and returning to the outlet side of the plenum.
Thus, a heat exchanger flow balancing system addressing the aforementioned problems is desired.
The heat exchanger flow balancing system is adapted for use in heat exchangers constructed with tubes of equal diameter extending between the inlet and outlet plenums, where the inlet and/or outlet plenum(s) do not distribute the fluid flow equally to all of the tubes. The flow balancing system serves to substantially equalize fluid flow through all of the tubes, thus substantially equalizing heat exchange between the tubes to increase the efficiency of the device.
Two examples of embodiments are provided and described, but should not be construed in a limiting sense. A first embodiment of a heat exchanger flow balancing system restricts the diameter of the inlet opening to various tubes, with the inlet opening being smaller for those tubes located farther from the single inlet tube or pipe of the plenum to substantially balance the flow in the tubes. A second embodiment of a heat exchanger flow balancing system accomplishes the flow equalization by means of a series of conical inlets, or nozzles, between each of the heat exchanger tubes and the plenum, with the inlet or nozzle opening being smaller for those tubes located farther from the single inlet tube or pipe of the plenum to substantially balance the flow in the tubes.
While the drawings depict heat exchangers having an intake plenum with a single large diameter delivery tube located substantially at the center of the plenum and with its axis normal to the axes of the smaller heat exchanger tubes, it will be seen that the heat exchanger flow balancing system may be configured for heat exchangers having their inlet or delivery tubes located in other positions relative to the plenum, e.g., at one end thereof, etc. The heat exchanger flow balancing system may be configured for installation at the outlet ends of the heat exchanger tubes, as well.
These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
Unless otherwise indicated, similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
The heat exchanger flow balancing system includes, for example, various embodiments, each providing for the equalization or substantial equalization of flow through the various tubes of the heat exchanger. The equalizing of the flow through the tubes results in relatively greater efficiency of the heat exchanger, as all of the tubes have substantially equal flow and thus substantially equal heat transfer with the surrounding environment.
In
The orifices 24a through 24s vary in diameter from smallest orifices 24a and 24s at the extreme ends 16a and 18a of the plenum 12a, generally as shown in
The greatest radial velocity component is typically generated closest to the center of the plenum 12a, close to the transfer pipe 22a. Accordingly, the largest diameter orifices 24i and 24k are located at the entrances to the corresponding tubes 14i and 14k, generally as shown in the cross-sectional view of
The other orifices have intermediate diameters between the relatively smallest diameters of the two end orifices 24a and 24s and the relatively largest diameters of the two orifices 24i and 24k, with the diameters changing incrementally, or changing based on the radial velocity at the corresponding orifice, between smallest and largest orifices, to substantially balance the flow in the tubes. Thus, typically the diameter of the orifice 24b is larger than the diameter of the orifice 24a, the orifice 24c is slightly larger in diameter than the diameter of the orifice 24b, etc., with the diameter of the orifice 24i being slightly larger than the diameter of the orifice 24h and the orifice 24i having a diameter substantially equal to the inner diameter of the tube 14i, and the diameter of the tube 14i being substantially equal to the diameter of the other tubes 14a through 14s, for that matter. Similarly, the orifices 24l to 24r gradually decrease in diameter between the relatively largest diameter of the orifice 24k and the relatively smallest diameter of the orifice 24s. For example,
The heat exchanger embodiment 110 differs from the earlier discussed embodiment 10 in the configuration of the flow restrictors. In the embodiment of the heat exchanger 110 of
Referring to
The graph 200 represents testing performed upon a plenum (or header) wherein the transfer pipe (e.g., inlet pipe) is installed at the center of the elongate header or plenum, with the central orifice 204i positioned at the center of the header. The legend at the top of the graph 200 indicates that the solid black line 206 represents a standard flow pattern in a conventional header tube (or plenum and tube) assembly, without varying the inlet orifices of the tubes. It can be seen that the solid line 206 on the graph 200 reaches maximum flow rates at the extreme ends of the plenum or header, through the end tubes and orifices 204a and 204q. Minimal flow rates are achieved through the orifices 204f, 204g, 204k, and 204l to each side of the central transfer pipe at the center of the header or plenum, with the difference in flow rates being on the order of about five times less through the unmodified orifices 204f, 204g, 204k, and 204l in comparison to the unmodified orifices 204a and 204q at the extreme ends of the header or plenum, for example.
Results following installation of flow restriction orifices as in the embodiment of
In the graph 200, the alternating long and short dashed line 210 represents the flow rates following installation of a series of conical restrictor nozzles, as described above in the embodiment of
Numerous variations on the above-described heat exchanger configurations may be provided while still making use of either (or perhaps both) of the flow modification orifices or nozzles described further above. For example, the heat exchanger may have its transfer pipe (inlet or outlet) located at or close to one end of the plenum or header. In such a case, the mirror image installation of restrictors to each side of the transfer pipe typically may not be applicable, but the restrictors may decrease in diameter toward the most distant heat exchanger tube. Moreover, while the restrictors have been described as being installed at the inlet plenum ends of the tubes, the term “transfer pipe” is intended to include either an inlet pipe or an outlet pipe, and should therefore not be construed in a limiting sense. In certain circumstances, the restrictors (orifices or nozzles) may be installed at the outlet ends of the heat exchanger tubes, or some combination of inlet end and outlet end installations may be carried out, for example. In any event, the installation of such orifice or nozzle restrictors in embodiments of heat exchangers, in a manner similar to the described embodiments, can significantly improve the average flow through such heat exchangers, and can thereby significantly increase heat exchanger efficiencies.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1748121 | Gay | Feb 1930 | A |
3196943 | Haerter | Jul 1965 | A |
3229761 | Ware | Jan 1966 | A |
3516483 | Benteler et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
4093024 | Middleton | Jun 1978 | A |
4458750 | Huber | Jul 1984 | A |
4607689 | Mochida et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
5542271 | Kudoh | Aug 1996 | A |
5901785 | Chiba et al. | May 1999 | A |
5934367 | Shimmura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6714413 | Ghosh | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7527089 | Gorbounov et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20030210525 | Chung | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20090229805 | Beamer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110061845 | Wand | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120292004 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120318473 | Nishikawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2209684 | Sep 1973 | DE |
2250336 | Jun 1992 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150053385 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |