This disclosure relates to evaporative heat exchangers and, more specifically, relates to hybrid evaporative heat exchangers that operate with wet indirect heat exchangers and dry indirect heat exchangers.
Some hybrid evaporative heat exchangers operate by transmitting fluid that needs to be indirectly cooled first through a dry, indirect heat exchanger and then through a wet, indirect heat exchanger. As used herein, the term dry indirect heat exchanger refers to a heat exchanger that does not utilize evaporative cooling to cool the fluid. On the other hand, the term wet indirect heat exchanger refers to a heat exchanger that utilizes evaporative cooling to cool the fluid.
Wet indirect heat exchangers use a “wet” process that dispense evaporative liquid, such as water, over the evaporative indirect heat exchanger coils which invokes the principals of evaporation to further increase the rate of heat transfer from the fluid. For instance, an evaporative indirect heat exchange process can operate about five times more efficiently than a dry heat exchange process. In some prior hybrid evaporative heat exchangers that operate with at least one wet and one dry indirect heat exchanger, the discharge air from the wet heat exchanger section goes directly to the ambient air and has no plume abatement feature, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,243,847 to Benz. Other hybrid evaporative heat exchangers, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,142,219 to Korenic, have hot, nearly saturated, discharge air pass entirely through dry heat exchange coils. Dry indirect heat exchangers typically have a fin and tube arrangement to increase the surface area of the heat exchanger. Further, dry indirect heat exchangers typically increase the static pressure drop seen by air passing through the hybrid evaporative heat exchanger.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, a heat exchange apparatus is provided that includes an evaporative heat exchanger assembly and a plume abatement assembly downstream of the evaporative heat exchanger assembly. The evaporative heat exchanger assembly may include, for example, serpentine coils and/or fill and an evaporative liquid distribution system. The plume abatement assembly includes as at least one heating element configured to increase the temperature of the airflow. As an example, the at least one heating element may include a dry heat exchanger configured to receive process fluid or another heat source such as steam or waste heat. The plume abatement assembly may also include a bypass such as an opening modulated in size by one or more closure members such as a damper or louvers.
The plume abatement assembly has an operative configuration wherein the airflow travels through the at least one heating element to permit the at least one heating element to raise the temperature of the airflow. The plume abatement assembly has a bypass configuration wherein less of the airflow travels through the at least one heating element of the plume abatement assembly. In one embodiment, the plume abatement assembly has an opening that is fully closed with the plume abatement assembly in the operative configuration and open with the plume abatement assembly in the bypass configuration. In other embodiments, the plume abatement assembly has an opening that is partially open with the plume abatement assembly in the operative configuration and more open with the plume abatement assembly in the bypass configuration. A closure member such as a damper may be used to modulate the size of an opening of the plume abatement assembly. As another example, dry heat exchangers of the plume abatement assembly may be moved relative to one another to modulate the size of an opening of the plume abatement assembly. In some embodiments, the number of openings may be adjusted to modulate the size of the opening. For example, the plume abatement assembly may have one opening that is open with the plume abatement assembly in the operative configuration and five openings that are open with the plume abatement assembly in the bypass configuration. The number and size of the openings of the plume abatement assembly may be configured for a particular application.
In one embodiment, the plume abatement assembly includes a dry heat exchanger assembly. The heat exchange apparatus may include a housing configured so that substantially all of the air that leaves the evaporative heat exchanger assembly travels through the dry heat exchanger assembly before leaving the hybrid evaporative heat exchanger.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, a hybrid evaporative heat exchanger is provided that may include a control system that operates a bypass damper to, for example, maximize the efficiency of the heat exchange system while reducing or eliminating plume when required. The control logic system may prioritize plume abatement and may save energy or water as a second consideration. If there is no need for plume abatement, or during times when the evaporative discharge air will not create a plume, then the control system may prioritize saving water and energy depending on the customer preference. In addition to abating plume from the wet indirect heat exchange section, the hybrid evaporative heat exchanger may operate in a dry mode wherein only the dry indirect heat exchanger is utilized which reduces water consumption. The hybrid evaporative heat exchanger may have a control system with a dry mode wherein the control system operates the dry indirect heat exchanger and limits operation of the wet indirect heat exchanger; a wet mode wherein the control system operates the wet indirect heat exchanger; and a hybrid mode wherein the control system operates both the wet and dry indirect heat exchangers for example operating the dry indirect heat exchanger to abate plume. The hybrid evaporative heat exchangers disclosed herein may also include direct heat exchangers, such as fill packs, to cool water that is sprayed onto the wet indirect heat exchanger.
This application provides examples of hybrid evaporative heat exchangers including incorporating at least one wet evaporative indirect heat exchange section and at least one dry indirect heat exchange section. The dry indirect heat exchange section may be used to abate plume from the wet section, be used to enhance the capacity of the dry performance of the unit, save water, conserve energy, or a combination thereof. The hybrid evaporative heat exchangers may include one or more dry heat exchange coil bypass dampers and an automated control system to maximize the efficiency of the heat exchange system while reducing or eliminating plume when required. The control system may prioritize plume abatement and may save energy or water as a second consideration. If there is no need for plume abatement, or during times when the discharge air will not create a plume, then the control system can prioritize saving water and energy depending on the customer preference.
A control system is disclosed that may have control logic used to operate the hybrid evaporative heat exchanger to indirectly cool or condense process fluid while reducing or eliminating visible plume while also saving energy and saving water depending on the customer's requirements. The control logic operates one or more dry heat exchanger bypass dampers of the hybrid evaporative heat exchanger so that the dry heat exchanger bypass dampers remain fully closed in the dry operation mode or when plume cannot be tolerated, partially closed to abate plume and balance the load between the wet indirect and dry indirect heat exchange sections when required, and open or partially open during the wet evaporative mode. This control logic may increase the airflow through the wet evaporative heat exchanger during wet operation thereby increasing the capacity of the heat exchange system during the wet operation, while having the ability to reduce or eliminate visible plume. The control logic may also save water by closing or partially closing the dry heat exchanger bypass dampers which promotes more heat transfer in the dry coil and the control logic may also turn off a spray pump to essentially cut the water evaporation in half. The control logic may also save energy by opening or partially opening the dry heat exchanger bypass dampers when desired to cause more of the heat load to be cooled in the evaporative indirect heat exchange sections. The control logic prioritizes plume abatement and may save water or energy as secondary considerations per the customer requirements. During the peak time of day, when energy costs escalate, the customer requirements may change from saving water to saving energy and these variables are fed into the control logic to make the proper decisions per the customer's request. In an embodiment with a direct evaporative heat exchange section and a dry plume abatement coil, the dry coil bypass damper opens to allow full wet operation and can be closed to abate plume.
Regarding
If the application is for a condenser, exit connections 16A and 16B are piped to connectors 18A and 18B. The process fluid is then indirectly cooled in wet indirect heat exchangers 2A and 2B then exits connections 20A and 20B and is then returned back to the process.
Spray pumps 26A and 26B are turned on when it is desired to pump sump water from sump 28 to sprays 42A and 42B. The spray water flows over wet indirect heat exchangers 2A and 2B and onto a direct heat exchanger for cooling the spray water, such as fill sections 22A, 22B. Spray pumps 26A and 26B can be selectively be both running to maximize energy savings, or only one pump may run to increase the dry performance and save water, or both pumps may be off for 100% dry operation. Fan 34 includes a motor 36 and is typically varied in speed to match the unit heat rejection to the customer desired process fluid setpoint. Fresh ambient air enters wet indirect heat exchangers 2A and 2B from air inlet plenum 38A and 38B. Fresh ambient air also enters direct sections 22A and 22B and discharges into the common discharge plenum under fan 34. Discharge air from fan 34 enters plenum 40 where it then flows through dry indirect heat exchangers 12A and 12B. Air also flows generally downward and across wet indirect heat exchangers 2A and 2B, through mist eliminators 30A and 30B, up through fan 34 to plenum 40, and then through dry heat exchangers 12A and 12B.
Regarding
When open, dry indirect heat exchanger bypass damper 44 reduces the static pressure fan 34 sees which ultimately increases airflow through wet indirect heat exchangers 2A and 2B and also increases the airflow through fill 22A, 22B. Increasing the airflow through these evaporative heat exchangers increase the wet performance of the hybrid unit ultimately saving energy. In addition, the dry indirect heat exchanger bypass damper 44 may be fully opened to maximize wet performance, be fully closed to maximize dry performance, or closed to eliminate any visible plume and save water. The dry indirect heat exchanger bypass damper 44 may modulate to control plume and the heat load seen by the wet and dry indirect heat exchangers, which may balance the degree of energy savings, water savings, and plume abatement.
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring to
Referring to
Regarding
With a look up table, the CPU 118 converts this differential pressure measured 104 to a process fluid flow rate. Alternatively, a direct measurement of the flow rate may be measured with a magnetic flow meter and fed to CPU 118 or this flow rate may be measured by the customer and fed to the CPU 118 via the processor bus 122 through customer port 120. Customer port 120 may be used to provide the operating mode, outside ambient conditions, process fluid and many other variables passed between the customer and the control process 118. The speed of the fan motor 36 is provided to CPU 118 via VFD signal 110. Finally, dry bulb ambient temperature and % relative humidity are measured via sensors 112 and 114 respectively and provided to the CPU 118 so that the psychrometric properties of the ambient air may be readily calculated and used for the logic of plume abatement as discussed below. In another embodiment, the dry bulb ambient temperature and % relative humidity may be received through the customer port 120 such as from a remote server computer over the internet. One or more other sensors may be used, such as a temperature sensor at the outlet of dry indirect heat exchangers 12A, 12B and/or a plume detector sensor.
Now referring to
Now referring to
Alternatively, during hybrid operation, process fluid is piped first to the dry coils 12A and 12B and the outlet connection is then piped to the indirect coil connect 15 where the process fluid may be evaporatively cooled through wet indirect coil heat exchanger 14. The control of dry coil bypass damper 44 may be used to abate plume, operate in a dry hybrid mode, or be used to save water and energy.
Now referring to
Alternatively, during hybrid operation, process fluid is piped first to the dry indirect heat exchanger 33 and the outlet connection is then piped to the indirect coil connection 121C where the process fluid can be evaporatively cooled through wet indirect heat exchanger 121D. The control of dry indirect heat exchanger bypass dampers 44 may be used to abate plume, operate in a dry hybrid mode, or be used to save water and energy.
Now referring to
Regarding
Now referring to
1—Saturation curve
2—Superheated air zone
3—Saturated air zone
4—Ambient air state point
5—Representative line joining multiple discharge air state points
6—Mixing line of ambient air and discharge air occurring below saturation curve (no plume line)
7—Mixing line of ambient air and discharge air coinciding with saturation curve (plume onset line);
8—Mixing line of ambient air and discharge air above saturation curve (visible plume onset line);
9—Mixing line of ambient air and discharge air coinciding with saturation curve (typical visible plume line);
9A—Leaving air state point without plume abatement; and
10—Degree of reduction of discharge dry bulb temperature to eliminate visible plume in the case of the typical visible plume line shown (plume visibility factor).
At the air discharge of evaporative cooling equipment, water droplets can be formed by condensation of water vapor in warm humid discharge air by contact with the colder ambient air, at certain ambient temperature conditions. This phenomenon is referred to as plume and occurs when the mixing line joining the ambient and discharge air state points intersects with the saturation curve on the psychrometric chart. The discharge air state point is calculated by adding the air enthalpy pickup as the air traverses through the evaporative cooling equipment to the ambient air enthalpy.
In
One approach for determining whether the discharge air from the evaporative cooling equipment will form a visible plume during a wet mode of operation of the equipment involves calculating the enthalpy of the air entering the evaporative cooling equipment, i.e., the ambient air. The enthalpy of the air entering the evaporative cooling equipment is calculated using the psychrometric function of dry bulb inlet air temperature (TiDB), wet bulb inlet air temperature (TiWB), and barometric pressure (P):
hi=f(Ti,DB ,Ti,WB ,P)
The enthalpy of the air entering the evaporative cooling equipment corresponds to ambient air state point 4 in
Next, the enthalpy of the air leaving the evaporative cooling equipment is calculated. The enthalpy of the air leaving the evaporative cooling equipment is the sum of the entering air enthalpy and the enthalpy picked up by the air in the evaporative cooling equipment:
he=hi +Δh
The enthalpy picked up by the air in the evaporative cooling equipment, i.e., the delta h value in the equation above, is the cooling capacity of the evaporative cooling equipment.
The air leaving an indirect heat exchanger having evaporative cooling liquid being sprayed thereon is typically saturated. Thus, without operation of a plume abatement coil of the evaporative cooling equipment, the air leaving the evaporative cooling equipment may be saturated and have a temperature provided by the psychrometric function:
Te,DB=Te,WB=f(he , P)
The discharge air state point 9A in
A straight line may be plotted (e.g., line 9 in
Next, the data for the line 9 and the saturation curve 1 are analyzed to determine whether there is a plume onset area above the saturation curve 1 and below the line 9.
To determine whether plume formation is occurring, a plume visibility factor is calculated to represent the magnitude by which the discharge air dry bulb temperature should be increased to eliminate visible plume. The plume visibility factor may be determined, for example, by the control system of the evaporative cooling equipment (e.g., control system 61), a building HVAC system controller, a remote computer (e.g., a server computer connected via the internet and customer port 120), and/or a user device such as a cellphone or tablet computer.
The plume visibility factor may be, in effect, the discharge dry bulb temperature offset needed to move the line 9 to the right of line 8 in the psychrometer chart of
In response to a plume formation determination, the control system may cause the bypass (e.g. damper 44) to close and may operate the dry indirect heat exchanger (e.g., 12A in
The dry indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B may be configured to provide a fixed or variable amount of heat to the air before the air leaves the hybrid heat exchanger 60. For example, the valve 13 that controls the flow of steam into the dry indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B may have only a closed configuration with no steam flow and an open configuration that provides a fixed flow rate of steam at a substantially fixed temperature into the dry indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B. When the control system 118A causes the valve 13 to open, the dry indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B provides a step-function type heating to the air before air leaves the hybrid heat exchanger 60. In another embodiment, the valve 13 is replaced with a variable speed pump configured to pump hot waste air into the indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B. The control system 118A may operate the variable speed pump to increase or decrease the flow rate of the hot waste air through the indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B and effect a corresponding increase or decrease in the amount of heat the indirect heat exchanger 12A, 12B puts into the air before the air leaves the hybrid heat exchanger 12A, 12B.
Now referring to
The method or control logic 100 is initiated at element 101 when the call for cooling is conveyed to the control system. In the absence of this call, the dry coil bypass dampers may optionally be closed for freeze protection as per 102. If the setpoint is being maintained the control logic does not progress further and is diverted back to the cooling call. If the cooling load can be met by running the unit dry, then the spray pump is kept off and the dry coil bypass dampers stay closed or are set to closed as per 106. The fan speed is controlled to match the required load, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call. If the cooling load cannot be met by running the unit dry, the control switches to element 105 at which point the spray pump is switched on.
If plume abatement is required, the plume abatement logic is initiated. However, element 107 overrides the plume abatement logic and diverts to element 113 if any reduction to the heat rejection capability at full fan speed precludes the heat transfer equipment from meeting the setpoint. If the customer has indicated that plume abatement is required, then the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated closed by a preset increment. As explained earlier, this will alter the discharge air condition to reduce or eliminate plume. The fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 109. If the operator does not indicate the need for plume abatement, element 110 acquires data that allows it to determine the occurrence of plume. The data collected pertains to the heat rejected by the equipment, which is translated to the enthalpy pickup of the air to calculate the discharge air state. The discharge air state is utilized to generate the air mixing line and to calculate the plume visibility factor. If the plume visibility factor exceeds the preset value, plume abatement is required. The dry coil bypass dampers are then modulated closed by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 112.
In some embodiments, the heat exchanger may include a plume detection sensor configured to detect the presence of a plume. The plume abatement logic may initiate plume abatement in response to the plume detection sensor detecting a plume from the heat exchanger even if the plume visibility factor does not exceed the preset value. As another example, the plume abatement logic may initiate plume abatement only if the plume visibility factor exceeds the preset value and the plume detection sensor detects a plume.
If plume abatement is not required or if the plume abatement logic has been executed, the control at 113 diverts the logic to either save water or save energy. To save energy, the dry coil bypass dampers are then modulated open by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 114. Along the water savings logic path, if reduction of the cooling capacity of the indirect heat exchanger (HX) at full fan speed precludes the equipment to meet the operator setpoint, then element 119 is initiated. If not, then element 116 comes into effect. At element 119, the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated open by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call. At element 116, if reduction of the cooling capacity of the indirect HX coil at full fan speed with one spray pump switched off precludes the equipment to meet the operator setpoint, then element 117 is initiated. If not, then element 118 comes into effect. At element 117, the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated closed by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the element 103. At element 118, one spray pump is switched off, and the control is set to element 117.
Now referring to
The control logic 400 is initiated at element 401 when the call for cooling is conveyed to the control system. In the absence of this call, the dry coil bypass dampers can optionally be closed for freeze protection as per 402. If the setpoint is being maintained, the control logic does not progress further and is diverted back to the cooling call. If the cooling load can be met by running the unit dry, then the process fluid flow from the plume abatement coil (PAC) (such as dry indirect heat exchangers 12A, 12B) to the direct HX (such as direct heat exchanger 115A) is blocked and the dry coil bypass dampers stay closed or are set to closed as per 406. The fan speed is controlled to match the required load, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call. If the cooling load cannot be met by running the unit dry, the control switches to element 405 at which point the process fluid flow is allowed to travel from the PAC to the direct HX.
If plume abatement is required at element 407, the plume abatement logic is initiated. However, element 407 overrides the plume abatement logic and diverts it to element 413 if any reduction to the heat rejection capability at full fan speed precludes the heat transfer equipment from meeting the setpoint. If the customer has indicated that plume abatement is required, then the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated closed by a preset increment. The fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 409. If the operator does not indicate the need for plume abatement, element 410 acquires data that allows it to determine the occurrence of plume. If the plume visibility factor exceeds the preset value, plume abatement is required. The preset value may be, for example, in the range of one to ten degrees, such as three to eight degrees, such as five degrees. The dry coil bypass dampers are then modulated closed by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 412.
If plume abatement is not required or if the plume abatement logic has been executed, the control at 413 diverts the logic to either save water or save energy. To save energy, the dry coil bypass dampers are then modulated open by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 414. Along the water savings logic path, if reduction of the cooling capacity of the direct heat exchanger at full fan speed precludes the equipment to meet the operator setpoint, then element 419 is initiated. If not, then element 416 comes into effect. At element 419, the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated open by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call. At element 416, if reduction of the cooling capacity of the direct HX coil at full fan speed, with process fluid diverted to only one direct HX precludes the equipment to meet the operator setpoint, then element 417 is initiated. If not, then element 418 comes into effect. At element 417, the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated closed by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call. At element 418, the process fluid flow from the PAC to one direct HX is blocked, and the control is set to element 417.
Now referring to
The control logic 500 is initiated at element 501 when the call for cooling is conveyed to the control system. In the absence of this call the dry coil bypass dampers can optionally be closed for freeze protection as per 502. If the setpoint is being maintained the control logic does not progress further and is diverted back to the cooling call. If plume abatement is required, the plume abatement logic is initiated. However, element 504 overrides the plume abatement logic and diverts it to element 510 if any reduction to the heat rejection capability at full fan speed precludes the heat transfer equipment from meeting the setpoint. If the customer has indicated that plume abatement is required, then the dry coil bypass dampers are modulated closed by a preset increment. The fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 506. If the operator does not indicate the need for plume abatement, element 507 acquires data that allows it to determine the occurrence of plume. If the plume visibility factor exceeds the preset value, plume abatement is required. The dry coil bypass dampers are then modulated closed by a preset increment, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call as per 109.
If plume abatement is not required or if the plum abatement logic has been executed, the control again is led to element 510. At element 510, the dry coil bypass dampers are opened fully, the fan speed is controlled to match the required setpoint, and the control logic is diverted back to the cooling call.
Regarding
Regarding
Uses of singular terms such as “a,” “an,” are intended to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms. It is intended that the phrase “at least one of” as used herein be interpreted in the disjunctive sense. For example, the phrase “at least one of A and B” is intended to encompass only A, only B, or both A and B.
While there have been illustrated and described particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated that numerous changes and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art, and it is intended for the present invention to cover all those changes and modifications which fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/820,546 filed Mar. 19, 2019, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3367413 | Forster | Feb 1968 | A |
3754738 | Blazer | Aug 1973 | A |
3923935 | Cates | Dec 1975 | A |
3998394 | Ovard | Dec 1976 | A |
4028440 | Engalitcheff, Jr. | Jun 1977 | A |
4076771 | Houx, Jr. | Feb 1978 | A |
4418023 | Dolan | Nov 1983 | A |
4637225 | Marshall | Jan 1987 | A |
4662902 | Meyer-Pittroff | May 1987 | A |
5226285 | Dankowski | Jul 1993 | A |
5273687 | Osborne | Dec 1993 | A |
5431858 | Harrison, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435382 | Carter | Jul 1995 | A |
5449036 | Genge | Sep 1995 | A |
5585047 | Mortensen | Dec 1996 | A |
5724828 | Korenic | Mar 1998 | A |
5775409 | Goto | Jul 1998 | A |
5816315 | Stark | Oct 1998 | A |
5816318 | Carter | Oct 1998 | A |
5944094 | Kinney, Jr | Aug 1999 | A |
5994094 | Hoetten | Nov 1999 | A |
6047555 | Weng | Apr 2000 | A |
6142219 | Korenic | Nov 2000 | A |
6213200 | Carter | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260830 | Harrison | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6427461 | Whinery | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446941 | Maheshwari | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6564864 | Carter | May 2003 | B2 |
6574980 | Morrison | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6684943 | Dobbs | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7107782 | Carter | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128310 | Mockry | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7310958 | Carter | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7484718 | Facius | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7603774 | Facius | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7802774 | Facius | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8412357 | Seem | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8434746 | Carter | May 2013 | B2 |
8483883 | Watson | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8676385 | Myers | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8833741 | Mockry | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9004463 | Carter | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9057563 | Carter | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057564 | Carter | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9182753 | Benosman | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9243847 | Benz | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9255739 | Aaron | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9279619 | Aaron | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9587885 | Aaron | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9995533 | Aaron | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10132577 | Martell | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10222146 | Mockry | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10288351 | Aaron | May 2019 | B2 |
10365001 | Salsbury | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10401843 | House | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10415902 | Shin | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10619953 | Blay | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10627176 | Shin | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10677543 | Auth | Jun 2020 | B2 |
11029093 | Shin | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11092394 | Blay | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20030070547 | Hubbard | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071373 | Hubbard | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040080060 | Mockry | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040196631 | Ueda | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040231824 | Paolillo | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050012230 | Kammerzell | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050077637 | Mockry | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070101746 | Schlom | May 2007 | A1 |
20070187851 | Facius | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080018001 | Kammerzell | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041087 | Muller | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080115921 | Hall | May 2008 | A1 |
20100010681 | Zugibe | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100154448 | Hay | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100281896 | Al Watban | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315770 | Tipley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326091 | Enayati | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110100593 | Benz | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113798 | Pichai | May 2011 | A1 |
20110168354 | Dejong | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110227236 | Vouche | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110289951 | Furlong | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120067546 | Bugler, III | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130113127 | Yang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130228941 | Bogh | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140209279 | Aaron | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216688 | Shelnutt | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229146 | Gonzalez | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150068708 | Mockry | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150069643 | Mockry | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160018125 | Hamstra | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160178262 | Rocha | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160313751 | Risbeck | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160363388 | Egolf | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170003078 | Vadder | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170284742 | Aaron | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180100700 | Beaver | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180100701 | Beaver | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180100703 | Beaver | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180202710 | Miller | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180224174 | Hollander | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190145721 | Blay | May 2019 | A1 |
20190195524 | Carter | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190212075 | Shin | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20210180891 | Rousselet | Jun 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2808810 | Sep 2013 | CA |
3030439 | Mar 1982 | DE |
0172403 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0264316 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0365815 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1698847 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2007285620 | Nov 2007 | JP |
101663258 | Oct 2016 | KR |
2005005905 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2007015281 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2010020160 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010037164 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2012114134 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2015059038 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2018004464 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Baltimore Aircoil Company; Chapter 15: Plume Abatement; pp. 87-88; publicly available before Mar. 19, 2019; 2 pages. |
Baltimore Aircoil Company; product overview of HXC: Principle of Operation from https://www.baltimoreaircoil.eu/en/products/HXC-principle-of-operation; publicly available before Mar. 19, 2019; 1 page. |
Baltimore Aircoil International nv; Product Report: BAC's Expertise from plume prediction to solution brochure; publicly available before Mar. 19, 2019; 2 pages. |
Lindahl, Jr., Paul; Jameson, Randall W.; Plume Abatement and Water Conversation with the Wet/Dry Cooling Tower; Presented at the 1993 Cooling Tower Institute Annual Meeting, Technical Paper No. TP93-01; Feb. 1993; 33 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/023640 dated Jun. 9, 2020; 13 pages. |
3C Condenser Heat Rejection Systems—SH09 Series Microchannel, Installation, Operation & Maintenance Manual; Muller Industries; publicly available before Jan. 20, 2014; 30 pages. |
Arteaga, Johnathan A.F. et al.; Prediction Method for the Performance of a Chiller Following a Cooling Load Profile; CONEM 2010 VI National Congress of Mechanical Engineering, Aug. 18-21, 2010 Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil; 10 pages. |
Bonneville Power Administration; Electric Ideas Clearinghouse—Bulletin Board—Technology Update: Optimizing Cooling Tower Performance; Nov. 1991; 4 pages. |
Carrier Corporation; Carrier® Chiller System Profiles—A Guide for Chilled Water Plant Operation; brochure; Copyright 1998; 4 pages. |
Chilled Water System Analysis Tool (CWSAT), Version 2.1—User's Manual; Oct. 2005; The University of Massachusetts College of Engineering Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Amherst, MA; 34 pages. |
Conserve it Pty Ltd; PlantPRO® brochure from https://www.conserveitiot.com/plantpro; publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 13 pages. |
CoolTools™ Chilled Water Plant Design Guide; Energy Design Resources; Dec. 2009; 281 pages. |
DeepMind AI Reduces Google Data Centre Cooling Bill by 40%; Blog Post from https://deepmind.com/blog/article/deepmind-ai-reduces-google-data-centre-cooling-bill-40; Jul. 20, 2016; 6 pages. |
Dempster, Ian; Machine Learning and Chiller System Optimization; brochure from https://www.districtenergy.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=455e8aa2-5764-d402-ecda-89078853ddc7; Feb. 2015; 13 pages. |
Deru, Michael et al.; U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the National Building Stock; Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-46861; National Renewable Energy Laboratory; Feb. 2011; 118 pages. |
Energy Center of Wisconsin; Fact Sheet: Evaporative Condenser Control—Techniques to Cut Energy Waste in Large Refrigeration Systems; Copyright 2001; 2 pages. |
Fan, Guo-Feng et al.; Application of the Weighted K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Short-Term Load Forecasting; Energies 2019, 12, 916; doi:10.3390/en12050916; 19 pages; published Mar. 9, 2019. |
Furlong, James W. et al; Optimization of Water—Cooled Chiller—Cooling Tower Combinations; CTI Journal, vol. 26, No. 1; p. 12-19; 2005; 8 pages. |
García Cutillas, Clemente et al.; Optimum Design and Operation of an HVAC Cooling Tower for Energy and Water Conservation; Energies 2017, 10, 299; doi:10.3390/en10030299; 27 pages; published Mar. 3, 2017. |
Geister, W. Ryan et al.; A Closer Look at Chiller Ratings; ASHRAE Journal; Dec. 2009, p. 22-32; 8 pages. |
GNV GL; Impact Evaluation of 2012 National Grid-Rhode Island Prescriptive Chiller Program; report prepared by KEMA, Inc.; Jul. 22, 2016; 35 pages. |
Goel, S. et al.; Enhancements to ASHRAE Standard 90.1 Prototype Building Models; Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland WA 99352; Apr. 2014; 59 pages. |
Green Koncepts Pte Ltd; Chiller Plant Optimisation—Ultra Low Energy Management with IoT & Machine Learning Controls; brochure from http://greenbuildingreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Track-1.3-Smart-Building-Roy-Arindam.pdf; publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 12 pages. |
Hattori, Yuki et al.; The Relationship Between Heat Load Profile and Energy Efficiency in District heating and Cooling Plant; Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, 14-16 November; p. 1926-1933; 8 pages. |
Ho, Simon; Trane® High Performance Chilled Water Systems; presentation; EarthWise HVAC Chiller—Tower Systems; Ingersoll Rand, Inc.; Sep. 2012; 18 pages. |
Hydeman, Mark et al.; PG&E's CoolTools™ Project: A Toolkit to Improve Evaluation and Operation of Chilled Water Plants; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Sep. 1997; 24 pages. |
Hydronic and Heat Pump Control features from https://www.75f.io/solutions/equipment-type/hydronic-heat-pump-control; publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 8 pages. |
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.; Trane® New myPLVTool Provides Quick, Simple Option for Chiller Economic Comparisons; brochure; Feb. 26, 2014; 4 pages. |
Jekel, Todd B. et al.; Energy Efficiency Improvements; Industrial Refrigeration Consortium at the University of Wisconsin Madison, WI; Reta National Conference 2017; 78 pages. |
Jekel, Todd; Condenser Controls & Control Strategies; presentation at IRC Research & Technology Forum, Madison, WI; May 10-11, 2017; 35 pages. |
Johnson Controls; Applying Artifical Intelligence to Built Environments through Machine Learning; brochure from https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/-/media/jci/insights/2019/bts/bts_jci-661_dv_ai_learning_white_paper_020819_4p_f3.pdf; publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 4 pages. |
Johnson Controls; HVAC&R Engineering Update: Use Only NPLV to Specify Chiller Efficieny; brochure from www.johnsoncontrols.com; Copyright 2009; 4 pages. |
Jourdan, Greg; Knowing When Your Chiller Isn't Energy Smart; presentation Energy/Facilities Connections Washington State University; May 6, 2015; 132 pages. |
Kim, Jee-Heon et al.; Modeling and Optimizing a Chiller System Using a Machine Learing Algorithm; Energies 2019, 12, 2860; doi:10.3390/en12152860; 13 pages; published Jul. 25, 2019. |
Klawunder, Shawn Eric; Thesis: Modeling and Analysis of Chilled Water Systems; Requirement for the Degree Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, Apr. 2000; 158 pages. |
Lee, W.L. et al.; Developing a Simplified Model for Evaluating Chiller-System Configurations; Applied Energy 84 (2007) 290-306; 17 pages. |
Lei, Zhao et al.; Dynamic Simulation and Analysis of a Water Chiller Refrigeration System; Applied Thermal Engineering 25 (2005) 2258-2271; 14 pages. |
Li, Xiao et al.; Self-Optimizing Control of Cooling Tower for Efficient Operation of Chilled Water Systems; Purdue University School of Mechanical Engineering, International High Performance Buildings Conference 2012; Paper 62; http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ihpbc/62; 11 pages. |
Navitas Captial; Whitepaper: Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the Built World; Jun. 2019; 34 pages. |
Peesel, Ron-Hendrik et al.; Optimization of Cooling Utility System with Continuous Self-Learning Performance Models; Energies 2019, 12, 1926; doi:10.3390/en12101926; 17 pages; published May 20, 2019. |
Pugh, Michael D.; Benefits of Water-Cooled Systems vs Air-Cooled Systems for Air-Conditioning Applications; presentation from Cooling Technology Institute (www.cti.org); publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 102 pages. |
Schwedler, Mick et al.; Tower Water Temperature . . . Control It How??!; Engineers Newsletter, vol. 24, No. 1, 1995; The Trane Company; 5 pages. |
Schwedler, Mick; Condenser Water System Savings—Optimizing Flow Rates and Control; Engineers Newsletter, vol. 41, No. 3; Trane® a business of Ingersoll Rand; Sep. 2012; 8 pages. |
SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.; Marley® Improving Energy Efficiency in Cooling Tower Design; presentation; publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 24 pages. |
Stocki, Michael et al.; Benchmarking an Energy Evaluation Tool for Chilled Water Systems; published by The American Counsil for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE); 2001; pp. 429-440; 12 pages. |
Sullivan, Brian; Chiller Selection Made Easier with myPLV™; Engineers Newsletter, vol. 44, No. 4; Trane® a business of Ingersoll Rand; Dec. 2015; 12 pages. |
Taylor, Steven T.; Optimizing Design & Control of Chilled Water Plants—Part 5: Optimized Control Sequences; ASHRAE Journal; Jun. 2012; pp. 56-74; 20 pages. |
Tiessen, Alex et al.; Chapter 14: Chiller Evaluation Protocol—The Uniform Methods Project: Methods for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures; Subcontract Report NREL/SR-7A40-62431; National Renewable Energy Laboratory; Sep. 2014; 24 pages. |
TrilliumSeries™ Condenser—Rigging, Operation & Maintenance Manual; Baltimore Aircoil Company; M450/I-E; 2013; 20 pages. |
TrilliumSeries™ Condenser; brochure from Baltimore Aircoil Company; S410/I-C; 2013; 12 pages. |
U.S. Department of Energy—Hospital Energy Alliance; Fact Sheet: Hospitals Benefit by Improving Inefficient Chiller Systems; Aug. 2011; 2 pages. |
Vallabhaneni, Kavita A.; Benefits of Water-Cooled Systems vs. Air-Cooled Systems for Air-Conditioning Applications; presentation from Cooling Technology Institute (www.cti.org); publicly available before Dec. 11, 2019; 88 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200300553 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62820546 | Mar 2019 | US |