This invention relates generally to air conditioning systems and, more particularly, to parallel flow heat exchangers.
Refrigerant maldistribution in refrigerant system evaporators is a well known phenomenon. It causes significant evaporator and overall system performance degradation over a wide range of operating conditions. Maldistribution is particularly pronounced in parallel flow evaporators due to their specific design with respect to refrigerant routing. Attempts to eliminate/reduce the effects of this phenomenon on the performance of brazed aluminum heat exchangers have been made with little or no success. The primary reasons for such failures have generally been complexity/inefficiency or prohibitively high cost of the solution.
In recent years, parallel flow heat exchangers have received much attention and interest, not just in the automotive industry but also in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC&R) industry. The primary reasons for the employment of the parallel flow technology deals with its superior performance, high degree of compactness and enhanced resistance to corrosion. Parallel flow heat exchangers are now utilized in both condenser and evaporator applications for multiple products and system designs/configurations. The evaporator applications, although promising greater benefits and rewards, are more challenging and problematic. Refrigerant maldistribution is one of the primary concerns and obstacles for the implementation of this technology in evaporator applications.
As known, refrigerant maldistribution in parallel flow heat exchangers occurs because of unequal pressure drops inside the mini-channels or microchannels as well as in the inlet and outlet manifolds. In the manifolds or headers, the difference in length of refrigerant paths, phase separation, gravity and turbulence are the primary factors responsible for maldistribution. Inside the heat exchanger mini-channels, variation in the heat transfer rate, airflow rate and gravity are the dominant factors. Because it is extremely difficult to control all these factors many of the previous attempts to manage refrigerant distribution, especially in parallel flow evaporators, have failed.
In the refrigerant systems utilizing parallel flow heat exchangers, the inlet and outlet headers usually have a conventional cylindrical shape. When the two-phase flow enters the header, the vapor phase is usually separated from the liquid phase. Since both phases move independently, refrigerant maldistribution tends to occur.
The problems of unequal flow distribution are particularly evident in multi-pass mini-channel heat exchangers wherein the inlet and outlet headers are commonly divided into longitudinally spaced sections which are interconnected by straight tubes. One approach to solving these problems is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,143,605, wherein an inlet manifold includes an internally disposed distribution tube with a plurality of orifices formed therein.
Serpentine, multiple pass heat exchangers are known in the art as shown by U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,069,980; 4,962,811; 5,036,909; 6,705,386 and U.S. 2005/0217834 A1. Generally, they do not incorporate the feature of multiple circuits. U.S. Pat. No. 5,036,909 does include multiple circuits but they are constructed to be in a nested, one inside the other, relationship. Such a design presents problems of inflexibility in design, manufacture and use. The present invention overcomes these problems.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, the plurality of parallel mini-channels are serpentine in shape so as to thereby provide a plurality of parallel flow passes but which are connected to the inlet and outlet manifolds only at the respective inlet and outlet ends. In this way, the inlet manifold can be relatively short and be directly connected to fewer inlet ends of the microchannels for uniform flow distribution. Further, each circuit has all of its flow passes laterally spaced from all of the flow passes of the adjacent circuits.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of promoting uniform refrigerant flow from an inlet manifold to a plurality of parallel mini-channels, including the steps of providing a flat tube shaped in a serpentine manner to form a plurality of flow passes for successively conducting fluid flow therethrough and fluidly connecting an end thereof to an inlet manifold and the other end thereof to an outlet manifold, with each circuit having all of its flow passes spaced laterally from all of the flow passes of the adjacent circuits.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, preferred and modified embodiments are depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
A multi-pass mini-channel heat exchanger in accordance with the prior art is shown in
The heat exchanger as shown comprises a four pass, seven circuit configuration. That is, there are seven tubes in each of the four pass groupings 24, 26, 27 and 28. The tubes in the pass grouping 24 thus fluidly interconnects the section 17 of the primary manifold 11 to the section 22 of the secondary manifold 12, with the pass grouping 26 then fluidly interconnecting the section 22 to the section 18 of the primary manifold. Similarly, the pass grouping 27 fluidly interconnects the section 18 in the primary header 11 to the section 23 of the secondary manifold 12, and the pass grouping 28 fluidly interconnects the section 23 of the secondary manifold 12, to section 19 of the primary manifold 11. The refrigerant then flows through the assembly as indicated by the arrows.
It should be understood that, with such a configuration, uniform distribution of refrigerant flow to the individual channels is very difficult to obtain. The primary reason is that the distribution to the seven tubes has to be made at the entrance of each of the pass groupings 24, 26, 27 and 28. During each pass transition, such as in section 22, two-phase mixture exiting pass grouping 24 will be allowed to mix, and will have the tendency to phase separate, leading to maldistribution to pass grouping 26. It should be pointed out that, as in the conventional configuration, the mini-channel tubes are spaced with fins in between.
In
It should be understood that the flat tube structure as shown represents a single circuit in a three pass configuration, and a multi-circuit heat exchanger can be obtained by simply juxtaposing other identically shaped tubes in parallel relationship with the tube as shown. These features will be more fully described hereinafter.
It should be recognized that although the tube is shown as being flat in its configuration, it may be formed in other shapes such as round, oval, or racetrack shaped in cross-section, for example. An advantage to the flat shape as shown is that this is conventional geometry for microchannel or mini-channel heat exchangers. Further, the flat tubes enable the design of a small inactive heat exchanger area at the top and bottom due to their flat profile.
The tube as shown in
Another approach to fabrication is that shown in
Another possible fabricating process that may be used that shown in
The applicants have recognized that, as the refrigerant is expanded as it successively flows through the various passes, it is desirable to progressively increase the cross sectional areas of the tubes in the downstream direction. Ideally, this would be accomplished on a continuous basis but, as a practical matter, such a design would be difficult to implement. Accordingly, this may also be accomplished in a step wise manner. Such a step wise approach can easily be implemented in the methods of fabrication as shown in
Considering now the manner in which the tubes may be combined to form a multiple circuit heat exchanger, a prior art, nested, approach is shown in
Referring to
In
Referring now to
The applicants have recognized that if a heat exchanger is arranged in such a manner that the tubes emanating therefrom are in a parallel horizontal arrangement, but with the tubes being vertically spaced, then gravity will tend to cause more of the heavier liquid refrigerant to flow to the lower tubes and more of the lighter vapor to the upper tubes, thereby causing maldistribution. Accordingly, one of the arrangements of 8A, 8B or 8C is preferable, wherein the inlet manifold is shown at 82 and the mini-channels are shown at 83. As will be seen in
In
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred mode as illustrated in the drawing, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
This application is a National Stage filing under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/033141, filed Feb. 5, 2009. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/034,503 filed Mar. 7, 2008. The entirety of both applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US09/33141 | 2/5/2009 | WO | 00 | 12/13/2010 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61034503 | Mar 2008 | US |