None.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a tube support device that is not a baffle for use within a heat exchanger. Specifically, the invention includes interlocking plates forming a cross member grid with square shaped openings each capable of supporting a single tube. A u-shaped nodule is provided along each plate within each square-shaped opening so as to contact the tube in an unsymmetric fashion.
2. Description of the Related Art
As shown in
Tube supports for use within shell and tube heat exchangers are described and claimed in the related arts. Designs address several problems common to shell and tube heat exchangers, namely, inadequate support of the tube bundle, tube vibrations, vibration induced contact between tubes, pressure loss across the shell, and construction complexity and cost.
A widely common tube support device is a baffle plate having holes through the thickness of the plate. Each hole is dimensioned so as to provide a clearance fit between plate and tube. The primary deficiency of such devices is the promotion of cross flow which in turn causes and/or exacerbates flow induced vibration.
Massy et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,600,792, describes a tube support structure having horizontally and vertically disposed plates interlocked at a right angle so as to form a parallelepipedal opening. The “egg crate” support, as it is commonly referred to, limits contact to at most two plates and the tube within each opening. As such, Massey allows limited vibration and movement of tubes within the tube bundle. This movement may allow repeated and uncontrolled contact between tube and plates resulting in tube failure.
Williams, U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,304, and Romanos, U.S. Pat. No. 3,420,297, describe other “egg crate” supports composed of parallel disposed plates interlocked at an obtuse angle so as to form a parallelogram-shaped opening. Williams and Romanos improve the longitudinal flow of fluid within the shell and reduce pressure loss across the support. Unlike Massy, Williams and Romanos provide contact between the four plates comprising the opening and the tube there through. However, this contact greatly increases the likelihood of binding between support structure and tubes during assembly and during expansion and contraction of the tubes in use. As such, damage to and failure of tubes is more likely during assembly and operation of the heat exchanger.
Jabsen, U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,088, and Roffler, U.S. Pat. No. 4,160,477, describe two additional “egg crate” supports comprised of metal strips arranged to form a hexagonal opening. In Jabsen, a circular or rectangular dimple along each plate insures contact between each plate about the hexagonal opening and the tube there through. In Roffler, a spring tab is provided along at least four plates about the hexagonal opening so as to contact the tube there through. Jabsen and Roffler provide numerous advantages including decreased pressure drop across the tube support structure, decreased vibration of tubes, reduced buildup of impurities between tube and plates, better flow and distribution of fluid, and a slidable grip between tube support and tubes so as to accommodate thermal expansion. However, Jabsen and Roffler, as well as Williams and Romanos, increase the spacing between tubes and therefore provide for fewer tubes within a tube bundle as compared to Massy.
Furthermore, baffle plates and the “egg crates” described by Massy, Williams, Romanos, Jabsen, and Roffler frustrate axial flow of the shell side fluid through the tube bundle. As such, the related arts do not optimize heat transfer within presently known shell and tube heat exchangers.
What is required is a tube support device that reduces the vibration of individual tubes, reduces vibration induced contact between tubes, minimizes the pressure drop across the support structure, and minimizes fabrication and assembly costs.
Furthermore, what is required is a tube support device that maximizes tube density within a tube bundle.
Furthermore, what is required is a tube support device that facilitates axial flow of shell side fluid through a tube bundle.
An object of the present invention is to provide a tube support device that reduces flow induced vibrations experienced by individual tubes, reduces vibration induced contact between tubes, minimizes the pressure drop across the tube support structure, and minimizes fabrication and assembly costs.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a tube support device that maximizes tube density within a tube bundle.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a tube support device that facilitates axial flow of shell side fluid through a tube bundle.
The present invention supports tubes in a tube bundle so that an annular space is provided between each tube and square-shaped support opening. The area of the annular space may be altered to regulate the amount of shell side fluid flow required for the application. The present invention is not a baffle but rather a support element that does not obstruct the otherwise natural flow of fluid within the shell about the tube support structure.
The present invention includes at least two first plates and at least two second plates. Plates have slots that are mutually arranged and aligned so as to allow the plates to interlock and thereby form a grid of depth-wise planar extent having at least one square-shaped opening. Each first plate and each second plate have a plurality of u-shaped nodules. At least one u-shaped nodule along each first plate and along each second plate extends into each square-shaped opening. U-shaped nodules are disposed parallel to and contacting a tube passing through each square-shaped opening. The grid is surrounded by a fluid with a preferred flow field along the axial length of the tubes. In alternate embodiments, a secondary flow field is provided across each tube.
In yet other embodiments, a heat exchanger of the present invention includes a shell, a plurality of tubes passing through the shell, and at least one tube support within the shell so as to support the tubes therein. The tube support and alternate embodiments thereof are as described above.
The described invention provides several advantages over the related arts. The invention facilitates primary and secondary fluid flow fields within the heat exchanger so as to prevent fouling and other obstructions that might otherwise accumulate within the support structure and diminish the efficiency of the heat exchanger. The invention simplifies assembly of a heat exchanger by avoiding binding between tubes and support structure. The invention reduces flow induced vibrations as a result of the fluid flow fields about the support structure.
Referring now to
Each first plate 2 has a plurality of slots 4, preferably equal to the number of second plates 3, partially traversing the width 18 thereof. Each second plate 3 has a plurality of slots 5, preferably equal to the number of first plates 2, partially traversing the width 18 thereof. A plurality of u-shaped nodules 9 are disposed across the length 19 and oriented in a paired arrangement along the width 18 of the each first plate 2 and each second plate 3. As such, the paired arrangement of u-shaped nodules 9 are disposed parallel to and equidistant from slots 4 or 5 immediately adjacent thereto, as represented in
First plates 2 and second plates 3 are planar disposed elements, preferably rectangular shaped and uniform in thickness 20. The length 19 of first plates 2 and second plates 3 is dependent on the number of tubes 7 within the bundle, the diameter of the tubes 7, and the cross section dimensions of the heat exchanger within which the tube support 1 resides.
The width 18 and thickness 20 of each first plate 2 and each second plate 3 should be sufficient to ensure the structural rigidity required to secure the tubes 7 within the tube support 1 and prevent deflection of the tube support 1 within the fluid flow field. However, width 18 and thickness 20 should be minimized to limit the pressure drop within the fluid field across the tube support 1. Furthermore, the width 18 should be substantially less than the axial length of the tubes 7. For example, a grid 17 composed of first plates 2 and second plates 3 having a width 18 of 1.5 inches and a thickness 20 of 0.063 inches was sufficient to support 1-inch diameter tubes 7.
Slots 4 and 5 are positioned at predefined congruent intervals along both first plates 2 and second plates 3, respectively. The slot width 21 is at least equal to the thickness 20 of the first plate 2 or second plate 3 to which it is joined so as to allow a width-wise contact and interlock. While various slot lengths 22 are possible, it is preferred for slot lengths 22 to be approximately one-half of the width 18 of the first plates 2 and second plates 3, as represented in
The application of the present invention within a heat exchanger requires that the tube support 1 to be composed of a corrosion resistant material. For example, it is preferred that first plates 2 and second plates 3 be composed of stainless steel. First plates 2 and second plates 3 may be cut, stamped, or formed to the desired shape via a variety of methods understood in the art.
Referring now to
Referring now to
U-shaped nodules 6a–6f may be produced by stamping methods or other techniques known within the art. In general, the method of manufacture should plastically deform plate material within a limited region so as to avoid shear along two sides 24a and 24b and effect shear along the remaining two sides 24c and 24d so as to form an opening 27 within the u-shaped structure.
Referring again to
Referring again to
Referring again to
The contact scheme represented in
The description above indicates that a great degree of flexibility is offered in terms of the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/524,949 filed on Nov. 25, 2003. The subject matter of the prior application is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3420297 | Romanos | Jan 1969 | A |
3600792 | Massy et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3674635 | Anthony et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3674637 | Delafosse et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
4124444 | Jabsen | Nov 1978 | A |
4160477 | Roffler | Jul 1979 | A |
4359088 | Jabsen | Nov 1982 | A |
4570883 | Wepfer | Feb 1986 | A |
4579304 | Williams | Apr 1986 | A |
4659541 | Rylatt | Apr 1987 | A |
4665866 | Wepfer | May 1987 | A |
5369866 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
6167105 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6321835 | Damsohn et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6526116 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050109494 A1 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60524949 | Nov 2003 | US |