The present disclosure relates generally to heat exchanger tubes, and to methods for enhancing thermal performance and reducing flow passage plugging of such heat exchanger tubes.
Two goals for heat exchanger manufacturing often include forming a product that exhibits efficient transfer of heat, while maintaining a relatively simple manufacturing process. In the automotive industry, in particular, it has also become desirable to combine multiple functions into a single heat exchanger assembly. As such, multiple tubes, fins, manifolds and/or end tanks have been implemented into single heat exchanger assemblies. Furthermore, the tubes used in heat exchangers, especially condenser tubes and oil cooler tubes, often include one or more flow passages formed therein. In theory, such flow passages are supposed to contribute to higher thermal efficiency of the tubes in which they are incorporated.
Features and advantages of embodiments of the present disclosure will become apparent by reference to the following detailed description and drawings, in which like reference numerals correspond to the same or similar, though perhaps not identical, components. For the sake of brevity, reference numerals having a previously described function may or may not be described in connection with subsequent drawings in which they appear.
Embodiments of the heat exchanger tubes disclosed herein advantageously include multiple flow passages, the hydraulic diameters and/or width of which vary from at least one flow passage to at least another flow passage. Generally, an average hydraulic diameter and/or width of one group of flow passages is greater than an average hydraulic diameter and/or width of another group of flow passages. During manufacture, the heat exchanger tubes may be brazed to other components, for example, a header.
One non-limiting example of such a brazing technique is controlled atmosphere brazing. Controlled atmosphere brazing employs a brazing alloy for attaching components that are formed of materials with higher melting points than the brazing alloy. The brazing alloy is positioned between components (or surfaces thereof) to be joined and, subsequently, the brazing alloy is heated and melted (e.g., in an oven or furnace, and often under a controlled atmosphere). Upon cooling, the brazing alloy forms a metallurgical bond with the components, thereby attaching the components together. Brazing paste or flux is used to improve wetting of the two pieces to be joined with the melted brazing material. Such materials aid in the pieces sticking together.
Such processing may result in the plugging of one or more flow passages, due, at least in part, to the amount of brazing material (e.g., flux, paste or clad) present. In the embodiments of the heat exchanger 100 and assembly 1000 shown in
Without being bound to any theory, it is believed that the varying flow passage hydraulic diameters and/or width disclosed herein advantageously reduce flow passage plugging (i.e., clogging of flow passages with, for example, brazing paste or clad) and fluid by-passing (i.e., fluid disproportionately moving through some flow passages and by-passing other flow passages). The reduction of plugging and fluid by-passing also advantageously increases heat exchanger efficiency. It is further believed that the positioning of the flow passages with larger hydraulic diameters and/or widths at the sides S1, S2 of the tubes 10, 10′ (when viewing a cross-section of a flat tube, for example, as seen in
It is to be understood that one or more of the tubes 10, 10′ in the heat exchanger 100 and the heat exchanger assembly 1000 includes flow passages (shown in
Referring now to
The tube body 12 may be formed of any suitable material, including copper and copper alloys, aluminum and various aluminum alloys.
The tube body 12 has two opposed sides 51, S2 and a bottom B. The portion of the tube body 12 that is the bottom B may vary, depending, at least in part, on the orientation of the tube 10, 10′. During manufacturing of a heat exchanger 100 (a non-limiting example of which is shown in
The heat exchanger 100 and assembly 1000 of
In another non-limiting example, the brazing migration area A may be close to the baffle 24 or 24′, as shown in
In an embodiment, as shown in
It is to be understood that the hydraulic diameter D1, D2 and/or width of each individual flow passage 14, 14′, 14″ is configured to obtain maximum effectiveness of the heat exchanger in which it is used. As used herein, the hydraulic diameter Dx is determined according to the following equation:
DX=4AP/Pw
wherein
Each of the variables (Pw and Ap) for the hydraulic diameter (DX) are determinable for a tube 10, 10′ according to standard geometric and engineering principles and will depend, at least in part, upon the configuration and variable of a particular tube 10, 10′.
It is to be understood that each individual flow passage 14, 14′ within the group G1 having the larger average hydraulic diameter and/or width may have the same or a different hydraulic diameter D1 and/or width than each other individual flow passage 14, 14′ in the group G1. For example, those larger flow passages 14, 14′ in closer proximity to the side S2, S1 may have a slightly larger diameter D1 and/or width than those larger flow passages 14, 14′ in closer proximity to the smaller flow passages 14, 14″. In still another non-limiting example, the hydraulic diameter D1 and/or width of each larger flow passage 14, 14′ may decrease moving from the side S2, S1 toward the center C. As specific non-limiting examples, two flow passages 14, 14′ may have the same hydraulic diameter and/or width of 0.59 mm, or one flow passage 14, 14′ may have a hydraulic diameter D1 and/or width of 0.58 mm, while another flow passage 14, 14′ may have a hydraulic diameter D1 and/or width of 0.60 mm.
Similarly, it is to be understood that each individual flow passage 14, 14″ within the group G2 having the smaller average hydraulic diameter and/or width may have the same or different hydraulic diameter D2 and/or width than each other individual flow passage 14, 14″ in the group G2.
While the larger flow passages 14, 14′ may be defined in the tube body 12 at any location that is likely to be adjacent a brazing migration area A, in an embodiment, a plurality/group/set (i.e., more than one) of the larger flow passages 14, 14′ is located at and near each of the two sides S1, S2. In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Generally, the average hydraulic diameter and/or width of the larger flow passages 14, 14′ is greater than the average hydraulic diameter and/or width of the smaller flow passages 14, 14″, but is less than twice the average hydraulic diameter and/or width of each of the smaller flow passages 14, 14″. It is believed that the difference in the average hydraulic diameters and/or widths between the smaller flow passages 14, 14″ and the larger flow passages 14, 14′ advantageously reduces or eliminates the by-pass phenomenon. In an embodiment, the ratio of the average larger hydraulic diameter and/or width to the average smaller hydraulic diameter and/or width ranges from about 1.1 to about 1.5. As non-limiting examples, the ratio of the average larger hydraulic diameter and/or width to the average smaller hydraulic diameter and/or width may be 1.15 or 1.3. In an embodiment, the average larger hydraulic diameter and/or width is equal to or less than 0.60 mm and the average smaller hydraulic diameter and/or width is equal to or greater than 0.20 mm. In another embodiment, the average larger hydraulic diameter and/or width is greater than 0.3 mm.
Referring now to
While the brazing migration area(s) A are not shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In a non-limiting example, the average hydraulic diameter and/or width of the larger flow passages 14, 14′ ranges from about 0.58 mm to about 0.60 mm, the average hydraulic diameter and/or width of the smaller flow passages 14, 14″ ranges from about 0.50 mm to about 0.54 mm, and the average hydraulic diameter and/or width of the intermediate flow passages 14, 14′″ ranges from about 0.55 mm to about 0.57 mm.
Embodiments of the heat exchanger tubes 10, 10′ disclosed herein advantageously include larger flow passages 14, 14′ and smaller flow passages 14, 14″. It is believed that 1) varying flow passage hydraulic diameters and/or widths and 2) positioning such flow passages 14, 14′, 14″ at particular areas along the tube body 12 advantageously reduces flow passage plugging and fluid by-passing, thereby increasing heat exchanger 100 and/or heat exchanger assembly 1000 efficiency.
It is to be understood that any desirable number of larger flow passages 14, 14′ and smaller flow passages 14, 14″ may be formed in the tubes 10, 10′. As a non-limiting example, the number of larger (exterior) flow passages 14, 14′ make up from about 5% to about 30% of the total number of flow passages 14, 14′, 14″ in the heat exchanger tube 10, 10′, depending, at least in part, on the length and width of the tube 10, 10′.
While several embodiments have been described in detail, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed embodiments may be modified. Therefore, the foregoing description is to be considered exemplary rather than limiting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708012 | Zimprich | Jan 1973 | A |
4570700 | Ohara et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
5172761 | Lyon | Dec 1992 | A |
5174373 | Shinmura | Dec 1992 | A |
5186244 | Joshi | Feb 1993 | A |
5491997 | Ogawa | Feb 1996 | A |
5567493 | Imai et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6216776 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6793012 | Fang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6854512 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6973965 | Meshenky | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7059399 | Chin et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7836944 | Antonijevic et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020066554 | Oh et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20070119581 | Kato | May 2007 | A1 |
20100011804 | Taras et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61202084 | Sep 1986 | JP |
2000266484 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001059689 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2005127597 | May 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2008/088296 dated Aug. 17, 2009 (12 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2008/088296 dated Jul. 15, 2010 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090166016 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |