The invention relates to a heat exchanger according to patent claim 1.
Evaporators are known in which the two-phase refrigerant is distributed from an inflow duct to a through-flow device, preferably pipes, in particular flat pipes. After the vaporous refrigerant flows through the flat pipes it exits the evaporator via an outflow duct.
In this context, the uniform distribution of the liquid refrigerant in the entire length of the inflow duct causes problems. The reason for this is, inter alia, the formation of different forms of flow depending on the operating state. Furthermore, the demixture of the two-phase refrigerant mixture, which is homogeneous at the inlet of the evaporator, over the length of the inflow duct plays a particular role. Individual pipes are therefore supplied exclusively with refrigerant vapor, as a result of which the evaporator power is worsened.
In order to distribute the refrigerant in an optimum way to all the flat pipes, the refrigerant is distributed only over a small portion (typically ⅓, ¼ or ⅙) of the flat pipes and is diverted further in a plurality of blocks and in this way is directed through the evaporator. In these diversions, additional installations for uniformly mixing the liquid and gaseous phase are frequently provided. The actual provision of the refrigerant to only a portion of the block and existing installations leads here to a significantly increased pressure loss of the refrigerant in the entire block and/or the evaporation section.
In addition, in the heat exchanger which is disclosed in US 2008/0223566 A1 and embodied as a two block circuit, in particular for a heating or air conditioning system for motor vehicles, the refrigerant in the individual collectors is intermediately mixed by installations such as intermediate walls, orifices etc., With the result that greater pressure losses are to be expected in the evaporator unit. The ratio of the pressure differences in the distribution unit (injection pipe+distributor unit for the 1st block) and the entire block (flat pipes+diversions between the blocks) is in the region of less than 3 here.
The heat exchangers which are of a two-block and also multi-block circuit design which are known from the prior art do, however, still leave something to be desired, in particular with regard to their structural design (complex fabrication process) and the comparatively high drop in the pressure of the refrigerant in the evaporation section.
The invention is based on the object of providing an improved heat exchanger which gives rise to small pressure losses in terms of the refrigerant, in particular in the heat-exchanging part of the evaporator, evaporation section and/or evaporator unit.
This object is achieved by means of a heat exchanger having the features of claim 1. Advantageous refinements are the subject matter of the dependent claims.
According to the invention, the heat exchanger, in particular for a heating or air-conditioning system in a motor vehicle, is designed having an evaporator unit to which a refrigerant medium can be supplied via a distribution unit and through which said refrigerant medium flows, and around which said refrigerant medium flows after only one diversion (two-block design) at the bottom in a diversion unit, wherein the distribution unit is designed to bring about uniform distribution of the refrigerant medium over the full width of the evaporator. Owing to the additional installations in the distributor unit, the two-phase refrigerant is therefore distributed uniformly among the flat pipes over the entire evaporator width and is diverted only once. A further advantage is the fact that owing to the uniform provision of the refrigerant to all the flat pipes intermediate mixing does not occur in the diversion. A configuration of the distribution unit with a ratio V of the pressure difference between the pressure difference in the distribution unit, on the one hand, and the pressure difference in the evaporator unit, on the other, can be provided which is larger than 3. An increase in the ratio of the pressure differences is necessary here for homogeneous distribution of the refrigerant in the distribution unit and therefore leads subsequently to an increase in the specific refrigerant power owing to a better temperature profile.
For example, the distribution unit can be configured with a ratio of the pressure difference between the pressure difference in the distribution unit, on the one hand, and the pressure difference in the evaporator unit, on the other, in the range between 3 and 70. These values have proven particularly advantageous within the scope of trials which have been carried out.
In this context, in particular a configuration of the distribution unit with a ratio of the pressure difference between the pressure difference in the distribution unit, on the one hand, and the pressure difference in the evaporator unit, on the other, can be provided which is in a range from 3 to 30 given a refrigerant medium mass flow of 30 kg/h, on the one hand, and from 30-70 in the case of a refrigerant medium mass flow of 250 kg/h.
The ratio of the pressure differences to the refrigerant medium mass flow is, as described above, illustrated by
Owing to the distribution via the distribution unit with an additional pressure loss of the refrigerant, among all the flat pipes, specifically over the entire evaporator width, a uniform temperature profile can be achieved without additional installations in the system or in the collecting boxes.
An embodiment of the invention provides, in this context, in particular a diversion unit which is free of any intermediate mixing means.
A further embodiment provides a pressure distribution element in the distribution unit for distributing the refrigerant medium in parallel to all the pipes through which and around which said refrigerant medium flows, in particular flat pipes, of the evaporator unit.
For example, the installation of an additional pressure loss element at the evaporator inlet (before evaporation) for distributing the refrigerant in parallel among all the flat pipes over the entire width of the evaporator can also be provided as a pressure distribution element, with the result that all the flat pipes are supplied uniformly with liquid and gaseous refrigerant (this pressure loss element has no effect on the refrigerant power here). In this context, a large ratio of the pressure loss during the distribution of the refrigerant at the evaporator inlet with respect to the pressure loss in the evaporator system (evaporator section) is obtained.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 200 003 649.0 | Feb 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP12/51984 | 2/6/2012 | WO | 00 | 10/15/2013 |