This application is based on and incorporates herein by reference Japanese Patent Applications No. 2003-178127 filed on Jun. 23, 2003, and No. 2004-60731 filed on Mar. 4, 2004.
The present invention relates to a heat exchanger disposed at a low-pressure portion of a vapor-compression type refrigerator where a pressure of a refrigerant reaches and exceeds a critical pressure of the refrigerant; it is effectively applicable to an evaporator of the vapor-compression type refrigerator using a refrigerant of carbon dioxide.
In a vapor-compression type refrigerator using a refrigerant of carbon dioxide (CO2), a refrigerant pressure is needed to reach and exceed a critical pressure of the refrigerant in a high-pressure portion when an ambient temperature is high (more than 30 degrees Celsius [° C.]). The pressure at the high-pressure portion is thereby approximately ten times as high as that of a vapor-compression type refrigerator using a refrigerant of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC); accordingly, the pressure at the low-pressure portion is also approximately ten times as high as that of the vapor-compression type refrigerator using the refrigerant of chlorofluorocarbon.
Cross-sectional areas of refrigerant channels are therefore circular or elliptic so that withstanding pressure can be increased (refer to JP-A-2000-111290 [U.S. Pat. No. 6,357,522 B2]). However, in a viewpoint of heat conductivity, an angled cross-sectional area (e.g., rectangular) is preferable. This angled cross-sectional area is described in JP-A-2000-356488 (JP3313086 B2), which provides an optimum example of a heat exchanger at a supercritical pressure. However, since its usage pressure falls within a high-pressure region (about 10 MPa) of a CO2 cycle, it does not provide an optimum example as an evaporator. Further, it provides; without specification of used material, no optimum pressure-withstanding design for a CO2 cycle that is operated especially at high pressures. Further, a refrigerant state is different between an evaporator and heat exchanger, so that contribution of a shape should be considered with respect to a refrigerant-side performance.
Further, rectangular cross-sectional areas of refrigerant channels having arcuate corners in JP-A-2000-356488, are inferior in heat conductivity to those having angled (not-arcuate) corners. In comparison with the arcuate corners (e.g., circular corners) having equivalent cross-sectional areas, the angled corners secure broader conductive areas in the refrigerant side, and thicker annular liquid films, further enabling uneven distribution of the liquid. It is assumed that the foregoing phenomena remarkably contribute to nucleate boiling.
Thus, the heat exchangers described in JP-A-2000-356488 is suitable as a radiator at a high-pressure portion, not being directly applicable to heat an exchanger at a low-pressure portion such as an evaporator. Moreover, refrigerant channels having angled cross-sectional areas are potentially involved in tube damage owing to stress concentration. In particular, attention must be paid to the channels having corners of nearly right angles.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a heat exchanger suitable for being disposed at a low-pressure portion of a vapor-compression type refrigerator using a refrigerant of carbon dioxide.
To achieve the above object, a heat exchanger used in a vapor-compression type refrigerator where a pressure of a refrigerant at a high-pressure portion reaches and exceeds a critical pressure, is provided with the following. A low-pressure refrigerant flows through the heat exchanger. The heat exchanger comprises a flat tube; refrigerant channels that are included in the tube; and inner pillars that are disposed between the refrigerant channels. A tensile strength of material of the tube is defined as S [N/mm2]; of one of the refrigerant channels, a dimension approximately parallel with a major-axis direction of the tube is defined as Wp [mm]; and, of one of the pillars, a thickness approximately parallel with the major-axis direction of the tube is defined as Ti [mm]. Here, [447×Wp/{10^(1.54×log10S)}−533/{10^(1.98×log10S)}]≦Ti≦[447×Wp/{10^(1.54×log10S)}−533/{10^(1.98×log10S)}]×2.3.
The above and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description made with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
(First embodiment)
A heater exchanger of the present invention is directed to, as a first embodiment, an evaporator of a vehicular air-conditioner using a vapor-compression type refrigerator whose refrigerant is carbon oxide (CO2). In this vapor-compression type refrigerator, a low-pressure refrigerant is evaporated in a heat exchanger at a low-pressure portion (low-pressure-end heat exchanger, such as an evaporator) to absorb heat in a low-pressure portion; this evaporated gaseous refrigerant is compressed to increase its temperature; thereby, the absorbed heat is radiated at a high-pressure portion. The refrigerator generally includes a compressor, a radiator, a decompressor, and an evaporator.
As shown in
In this embodiment, these components of the tubes 2, the head tanks 3, and the like are formed of aluminum alloy and integrated using brazing or soldering. As described in a book of “Setsuzoku/Setshgou Gijyutsu (connection/joint technology)” published by Tokyo-denki-daigaku-syuppan-kyoku (Tokyo Denki University Press), the “brazing or soldering” is a technology enabling joint without main bodies being melted. For instance, “brazing” is a technology where joint is performed using filler metal (“brazing filler metal”) having a melting point of not less than 450 degrees Celsius (° C.), while “soldering” is a technology where joint is performed using filler metal (“solder”) having a melting point of not more than 450° C.
Further, as shown in
Next, of the evaporator 1, dimensions and the like of the tube 2 that are features of this embodiment will be explained below with reference to
Definitions and the like are as follows:
Here, a tensile strength of the material of the tube 2 is a result of tensile test complying with JIS H 4100. In this embodiment, the material of the tube 2 is A1060-O, having a tensile strength of 70 N/mm2.
In this specification, “approximately something” includes “accurately something” in addition to “approximately something.” For instance, “approximately parallel” includes “accurately parallel” in addition to “approximately parallel.”
Referring to
Accordingly, a line OL that is formed by connecting bending points of the L-shaped lines is an optimum ratio line between To and Ti, Ti being represented as follows:
Ti=447×Wp/10A−533/10B,
where A=(1.54×log10S), and B=(1.98×log10S).
Hereinafter, this formula is referred to as a basic formula. The basic formula is derived from the following method. A relationship between the inner pillar thickness Ti and channel major-axis dimension Wp is computed with respect to each tensile strength S by a least squares method (Ti=αWp+β). A relational formula of the proportionality constant a and constant α with respect to the tensile strength S is obtained (α=f(S), β=f(S)). These are more accurately approximated using logarithm approximation. The values of α, β that are represented by logarithm approximate expression are inserted to Ti (=αWp+β) that is obtained by the least squares method, so that the basic formula of Ti is computed.
Further, regions where the maximum stress is generated are shown in
Next, the optimum region of Ti will be explained with reference to
447×Wp/10A−533/10B≦Ti≦2.3×(447×Wp/10A−533/10B),
where A=(1.54×log10S), and B=(1.98×log10S).
Further, since the refrigeration capability remarkably decreases from approximately 1.8, preferable Ti region is additionally set as follows:
447×Wp/10A−533/10B≦Ti≦1.8×(447×Wp/10A−533/10B),
where A=(1.54×log10S), and B=(1.98×log10S).
Next, the optimum region of a ratio of To and Ti will be explained with reference to
Further, since the refrigeration capability remarkably decreases at To/Ti of less than 0.5 and more than 2.0, a preferable To/Ti region is additionally set between 0.5 and 2.0, including 0.5 and 2.0 (0.5≦To/Ti≦2.0).
Further, when the tube is practically designed, an additional thickness is preferably required for a manufacturing tolerance in addition to the thickness withstanding pressure and a tolerance against corrosion while the usage. In particular, the evaporator undergoes repeated wet conditions, so that it is subject to the corrosion. The additional thickness as the tolerance for Ti is approximately 0.05 to 0.25 mm, while an additional thickness for To is approximately 0.05 to 0.40 mm. In consideration of the above, practical Ti′ and To′ are required to be set as follows:
Ti+0.05≦Ti′≦Ti+0.25,
To+0.05≦To′≦To+0.40.
Further the optimum To/Ti is 1.5; therefore,
1.5×(Ti−0.25)+0.05≦To≦1.5×(Ti−0.05)+0.40
As a result, a preferable range of practical thickness ratio of To′/Ti′ is set as follows:
1.5−0.325/Ti′≦To′/Ti′≦1.5+0.325/Ti′.
For instance, when Ti′ is equal to 1 mm, 1.175≦To′/Ti′≦1.825.
Further, as a cross-sectional area of the refrigerant channel 2a decreased, the flow velocity increases to thereby increase heat conductivity; as a cross-sectional area of the refrigerant channel 2a decreased, a pressure loss increases as shown in
Here, in
In this embodiment, in consideration of the result of the arithmetic simulation shown in
Further, in consideration of the above formula and To/Ti between 0.2 and 2.6 including both the ends (0.2≦To/Ti≦2.6), a minor-axis dimension Ht of the tube 2 is preferably set to between 0.8 mm and 2.0 mm including both the ends (0.8≦Ht≦2.0).
In this embodiment, an aluminum alloy is used whose tensile strength is between 50 and 220 N/mm2 including both the ends (50≦S≦220); however, for an evaporator used in a vehicular air-conditioner using a refrigerant of CO2, an alumina alloy preferably has a tensile strength between 110 and 200 N/mm2 including both the ends. The reason of not more than 200 N/mm2 results from decrease in productivity. As the tensile strength increases, hardness typically increases to thereby increase abrasiveness of the mold, resulting in the decrease in productivity.
Further, as shown in
(Second Embodiment)
In the first embodiment, the present invention is directed to an evaporator, while, in a second embodiment, to an inner heat exchanger 6 shown in
(Other)
In the above embodiments, the refrigerant channel has a cross-sectional area of a square; however, without any limitation to the present invention, it can has a cross-sectional area of a different shape such as that of a rounded corner shown in
In the above embodiments, all of the multiple refrigerant channels have the same shapes of the cross-sectional areas; however, without any limitation to the present invention, they can include, as shown in
Further, as shown in
Further, as shown in
Further, as shown in
Further, as shown in
In the above embodiment, it is described as Ti=447×Wp/10A−533/10B, where A=(1.54×log10S), and B=(1.98×log10S); however, without any limitation, Ti can be included in a range as (447×Wp/10A−533/10B)≦Ti≦2.3×(447×Wp/10A−533/10B), where A=(1.54×log10S), and B=(1.98×log10S).
In this embodiment, an aluminum alloy is used whose tensile strength is between 50 and 220 N/mm2 including both the ends; however, this invention is not limited to this aluminum alloy.
In this embodiment, this invention is directed to an evaporator; however, without any limitation, it can be directed to a heat exchanger disposed at a low-pressure portion, which is used, for instance, for a supercritical cycle.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made in the above-described embodiments of the present invention. However, the scope of the present invention should be determined by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2003-178127 | Jun 2003 | JP | national |
2004-060731 | Mar 2004 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5476141 | Tanaka | Dec 1995 | A |
6216776 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6289981 | Tokizaki et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6340055 | Yamauchi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357522 | Dienhart et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
20020050337 | Kaspar et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030209344 | Fang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040069477 | Nishikawa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000018867 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-356488 | Dec 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040256090 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |