One or more aspects of the invention relate generally to package sealing lidstock and more particularly, to a novel heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for use in high temperature retortable packaging.
Packaged foodstuffs, medicines, and the like can be contaminated during processing. Accordingly, they are often treated subsequent to the packaging operation to reduce spoilage. For some products which are especially susceptible to spoilage, these processes include sterilization, pasteurization, and the like. These processes are often performed in retorts under elevated conditions of heat and temperature for specified, often prolonged periods of time.
Where it is desirable to provide packaging in the form of rigid containers, it is often desirable to seal the package with a membrane or film. This membrane serves several purposes. It prevents tampering and pilfering of the container's contents. It assures continued cleanliness of the container's interior as well as the contents therein. Moreover, it can prevent gases, such as oxygen, from entering the package. Finally, it can serve as a label to identify and market the manufacturer's product.
One commonly practiced method for implementing such a sealing membrane is to provide one surface thereof with a sealing resin which can be adhered to the rigid container during processing. Such resins must be approved for direct food contact. The membrane is bonded to a rim about an opening on the container by activating the resin, often by means of heat. One methodology for providing this bonding heat is by induction sealing.
Induction sealing is generally performed by an inductive coil inside a sealing apparatus. The coil creates an electromagnetic field when it is energized by an electric current. The electromagnetic field causes an aluminum foil layer disposed in the lidstock to heat. This heating causes a resin coating, generally applied to the foil, to melt and adhere to the lip or rim of the container opening, thereby forming a seal between the lidstock and the container. When the container leaves the electromagnetic field, the foil cools, and the seal between the lidstock and the container is completed.
Early closure membranes required the user to cut into the membrane to open the container. For reasons of consumer convenience, it is now often desirable that such membranes be readily peelable from the container in order to provide access to the material stored therein. Examples of such implementations include, but are not limited to, dietary supplements, single serving convenience foods, and the like.
The foregoing examples of peelable lidstock membranes further illustrate a problem with existing technology. Where a peelable lidstock is utilized to package many foodstuffs, including adult dietary supplements, baby formula, and the like, an especially high degree of seal reliability is required. This is due to the fact that many such foodstuffs serve as excellent culture media for spoilage and pathological microorganisms, and infants and the elderly generally have lessened resistance to infection. To ensure that a healthy product is produced, many such foodstuffs are heat-treated in retorts subsequent to filling and sealing. With existing technologies, the heat used in retorting the packaged product often leads to softening of the sealing resins with concomitant loss of seal integrity and higher seal failures. In at least one application, the maximum acceptable failure rate is three failures per million containers.
A further problem with existing retortable lidding membranes is the removal thereof from the containers to which they are applied. The typically encountered induction sealed membrane is often substantially equal in form and size to the container to which it is applied, and is generally not substantially larger than that outer diameter. Accordingly, it is usually somewhat awkward to remove such membranes, as there is often no substantial “handle”, or removal feature, to remove the membrane.
One possible solution to this latter problem was the development of asymmetrical membranes, where the asymmetry provided a tab which extended substantially beyond the rim of the container, providing the requisite “handle” for removal of the membrane. An example of this methodology is the use of oval membranes over round openings. The problem with using this methodology in induction sealed membranes is that the induction energy used during the sealing process tends to follow the rim of the foil and not along the mass of the container rim. Accordingly, the energy available for sealing is substantially diminished at the container/seal juncture in the region of the asymmetry. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this leads to increased seal failures at the region of asymmetry, with concomitant increases in product leakage and spoilage.
Accordingly, it would be desirable and useful to provide a heat-sealable, peelable lidding membrane suitable for retort packaging.
It would be further desirable and useful to provide a heat-sealable, peelable lidding membrane suitable for retort packaging which incorporates an easy removal feature therewith.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a peelable seal for a container including a plurality of layers bonded or laminated together.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a peelable seal for a container which withstands retort packaging without damage to the seal.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane of laminated construction wherein the bond and the construction is both chemical and mechanical through heat, co-extrusion or conduction/induction seal.
It a further object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane of laminated construction wherein the topmost layer is made of material that has the strength and thickness such that it will tear before it separates from an adjacent layer.
It is even a further object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane of laminated construction so that when subjected to retort packaging the membrane does not tear nor delaminate under retort processing.
It is even another object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane which is weak enough to be peelable but strong enough to survive retort processing.
More particularly, the present invention is a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane that is subjected to retort packaging wherein the membrane includes a top layer, preferably a plastic layer, laminated to a foil layer with a first adhesive. A co-extruded layer is laminated to the foil layer with a second adhesive, the co-extruded layer having a plastic body co-extruded with a heat-sealable sealing resin layer.
Even more particularly, the present invention is a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for sterilizable packaging including a sealant layer structure wherein the sealant layer structure is bondable to a container lip with a strength sufficient to allow the sealant layer to remain with the container when the seal is peeled free. The sealant layer is also capable of tearing at the periphery of the container lip when the seal is peeled free. A sealant layer backup structure is also provided which is co-extrusion bonded to the sealant layer with a strength sufficient to fracture the sealant layer at or near the periphery of the container lip during peeling of the complete membrane and delaminates from the sealant layer adjacent the container sealing lip. The sealant layer backup structure has a tear resistance sufficient to achieve the fracture and delamination and is comprised of one or more layers which may be co-extrusion or adhesive bonded together.
The accompanying drawings show exemplary embodiments in accordance with one or more aspects of the invention; however, the accompanying drawings should not be taken to limit the invention to the embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
In this preferred embodiment, layer 102 may be implemented as a 100-200 gauge (PET) or polyester layer laminated with a solventless or waterbase or solvent-based first adhesive 104 to a 1.0 to 2.0 mil aluminum foil layer 106. A preferred adhesive is a polyurethane based adhesive cured with an isocyanate based curing agent. One such adhesive/curing agent pair found to be suitable is Liofol® UR2780-US cured with Liofol® UR5891-US curing agent, available from Liofol Company, 407 Gregson Drive, Cary, N.C. These components are mixed in the ratio of five parts adhesive to one part curing agent. The mixed adhesive may be diluted with a solvent to provide a desired coat weight. Such solvents for this particular adhesive include, but are not necessarily limited to ethyl acetate, acetone, and methyl ethyl ketone. In one embodiment, a diluted adhesive includes 62% adhesive base, 13% curing agent, and 25% acetone. Conventionally, water-based adhesives have been used for lidstock membranes involving direct food contact; however, such water-based adhesives may lack laminate integrity thereby negatively impacting seal reliability. In contrast, this embodiment employs a solvent-based adhesive that improves seal reliability over that afforded by conventional water-based adhesives. Though a particular solvent-based adhesive is disclosed herein, other known solvent-based adhesives may be used. Moreover, adhesives other than solvent-based adhesives may be used if they provide sufficient seal reliability after being subjected to retort processing.
Laminating equipment is used to apply an adhesive, such as a diluted adhesive, to PET layer 102 at a dry coat weight of 2 to 3 lbs per ream. The use of adhesive at normal weights found in the sealing industry was found to provide inadequate lamination reliability between the several layers of membrane 100. This dry coat weight is in excess of conventional dry coat weights. Solvent content may be modified as required to attain this coat weight. Various PET or polyester films are formed with at least one side treated to improve adhesion. Where layer 102 is so formed, adhesive 104 is applied to that side. Similarly, aluminum foil is often formed with one polished side and one side which has a matte finish. Where foil layer 106 is provided with at least one polished side, that side is laminated facing the PET or polyester layer 102 when used in retortable packaging.
While a membrane may be formed in a number of temperature applications regimes, in one embodiment, lamination was conducted at 40° to 50° C. Alternative lamination temperatures may be employed. Subsequent to this first lamination step, a curing step may be used. In one embodiment, the laminate roll is removed from the laminating equipment and cured at a temperature of approximately 5° to 10° C. above ambient temperature for a period of approximately three weeks.
Co-ex layer 110 is a polyethylene film, preferably a linear medium-density polyethylene co-extruded with a combination of propylene and/or ethylene co-polymer resins. Having reference now to
Subsequent to the previously discussed first curing, the laminate roll is remounted into laminating equipment and co-ex layer 110 is laminated to foil layer 106 utilizing adhesive 108. Adhesive 108 may be the previously discussed Liofol® UR2780/UR5891 adhesive system, applied at 2 to 3 lbs, per ream dry coat weight.
After lamination, the roll of membrane is again removed from the laminating equipment and cured for a period of approximately two weeks at approximately 5°-10° C. above ambient temperature. Following the second curing, the roll of laminate membrane is ready for such forming steps as dictated by the packaging application. These steps include, but are not limited to, cutting, slitting, die-cutting, imprinting, and the like.
In one application, membrane 100 can be implemented as a part of a sealing system for sealing necked bottles or the like with screw-caps. Such an application is shown in
Additionally, the peelable sealing membrane may have imprint images or messages on an upper surface of membrane 100. This may be effected by simply imprinting on an upper surface of PET or polyester layer 102. Alternatively, and as shown in
In another embodiment of membrane 100, a peelable sealing membrane is provided by including a removal feature. In this embodiment, a Unipac™, or Lift-n-Peel™, available from Unipac Corporation, 125 Edward Street, Aurora, Ontario, Canada, L4G 1W3 is used, an example of which is shown in
An alternate removal feature is shown in
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that regarding asymmetrical sealing membranes the induction energy used during the sealing process tends to follow the rim of the foil and not along the mass of the container rim. Accordingly, the energy available for sealing is substantially diminished at the container/seal juncture in the region of the asymmetry. This leads to increased seal failures, with concomitant increases in product leakage and spoilage.
This implementation provides a convenient pull tab to remove peelable membrane 800, while it avoids the previously discussed problem of induction energy applied to asymmetrical foils. Again, not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this is due to the fact that while membrane 800 is itself asymmetrical, foil layer 822 of the cap seal is substantially symmetrical with respect to the geometry of the rim of container 210. Foil layer 822, heated upon the application of induction energy, heats membrane 800 as previously discussed, and enhances the seal between membrane 800 and container 210, without the aforementioned problems with reduced seal energy and integrity at tab 812.
While the foregoing describes exemplary embodiments in accordance with one or more aspects of the invention, other and further embodiments in accordance with the one or more aspects of the invention may be devised without departing from the scope thereof, which is determined by the claims that follow and equivalents thereof. Claims listing steps do not imply any order of the steps. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners, as noted.
This application is a utility patent application and claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) and priority to provisional patent application No. 60/602,391 filed Aug. 17, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1346112 | Bruns | Jul 1920 | A |
1556020 | Noll | Oct 1925 | A |
1910913 | Conner | May 1933 | A |
1916977 | Gutmann | Jul 1933 | A |
1937492 | Merolle | Nov 1933 | A |
1961033 | Bricks | May 1934 | A |
1995350 | Hoag | Mar 1935 | A |
2039757 | Von Till | May 1936 | A |
2085934 | Von Till | Jul 1937 | A |
2188946 | Gutmann | Feb 1940 | A |
2242256 | McManus | May 1941 | A |
2312513 | Wilson | Mar 1943 | A |
2620939 | Weisgerber | Dec 1952 | A |
2643021 | Freedman | Jun 1953 | A |
2670869 | Martin | Mar 1954 | A |
2681742 | Miller | Jun 1954 | A |
2686606 | Froitzheim | Aug 1954 | A |
2686607 | Froitzheim | Aug 1954 | A |
2748969 | Leary | Jun 1956 | A |
2904837 | Crabbe | Sep 1959 | A |
2929525 | Glover et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3143364 | Klein | Aug 1964 | A |
3169656 | Wieckmann | Feb 1965 | A |
3186209 | Friedman | Jun 1965 | A |
3189209 | Owens | Jun 1965 | A |
3224617 | Hohl | Dec 1965 | A |
3245857 | Rutledge | Apr 1966 | A |
3255907 | Eddy | Jun 1966 | A |
3266658 | Meissner | Aug 1966 | A |
3331523 | Exton | Jul 1967 | A |
3360149 | Roth | Dec 1967 | A |
3501042 | Risch | Mar 1970 | A |
3527372 | Manning | Sep 1970 | A |
3530917 | Donovan | Sep 1970 | A |
3547294 | Williams | Dec 1970 | A |
3612325 | Williams | Oct 1971 | A |
3632004 | Grimes et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3788510 | Collins | Jan 1974 | A |
3815314 | Pollock et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3823182 | Nonaka et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3845525 | Gaylord | Nov 1974 | A |
3879492 | Bontinick | Apr 1975 | A |
3910410 | Shaw | Oct 1975 | A |
3917100 | Dukess | Nov 1975 | A |
3923179 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923182 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923183 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923184 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923185 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3944103 | Cros | Mar 1976 | A |
3980194 | Costa | Sep 1976 | A |
4007848 | Snyder | Feb 1977 | A |
4009793 | Minesinger et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4013188 | Ray | Mar 1977 | A |
4066181 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4076152 | Mumford | Feb 1978 | A |
4091949 | Fowles et al. | May 1978 | A |
4093093 | Fowles et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4109815 | Collins, III | Aug 1978 | A |
4128184 | Northup | Dec 1978 | A |
4151924 | Jameson | May 1979 | A |
4181232 | Bellamy et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4204604 | Morin et al. | May 1980 | A |
4207990 | Weiler et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4209126 | Elias | Jun 1980 | A |
4266687 | Cummings | May 1981 | A |
4275817 | Patton | Jun 1981 | A |
4276989 | Hicks | Jul 1981 | A |
4280653 | Elias | Jul 1981 | A |
4358919 | Hirota et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4364485 | Knapp | Dec 1982 | A |
4369889 | Ostrowsky | Jan 1983 | A |
4378894 | Willis et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4381840 | Ostrowsky | May 1983 | A |
4382521 | Ostrowsky | May 1983 | A |
4392579 | Uhlig et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4423821 | McIntosh | Jan 1984 | A |
4427126 | Ostrowsky | Jan 1984 | A |
4430288 | Bonis | Feb 1984 | A |
4434904 | D'Amico et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4457440 | Dukess | Jul 1984 | A |
4473163 | Geiger | Sep 1984 | A |
4493427 | Wolkonsky | Jan 1985 | A |
4496674 | Ehrhart et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4501371 | Smalley | Feb 1985 | A |
4526279 | Weiler et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4527705 | Prades | Jul 1985 | A |
4564117 | Herbert | Jan 1986 | A |
4576297 | Larson | Mar 1986 | A |
4583665 | Barriac | Apr 1986 | A |
4588099 | Diez | May 1986 | A |
4625875 | Carr et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637519 | Dutt et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4638913 | Howe | Jan 1987 | A |
4643330 | Kennedy | Feb 1987 | A |
4648520 | Stull | Mar 1987 | A |
4651886 | Stull | Mar 1987 | A |
4662529 | Moore | May 1987 | A |
4668458 | Whitney | May 1987 | A |
4674642 | Towns et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4674643 | Wilde et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682463 | Foldesi | Jul 1987 | A |
4683016 | Dutt et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4704180 | Marsella et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4705188 | Rahn | Nov 1987 | A |
4706835 | Kreiseder | Nov 1987 | A |
4721215 | Bertaud | Jan 1988 | A |
4722447 | Crisci | Feb 1988 | A |
4723685 | Fillmore et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4730748 | Bane | Mar 1988 | A |
4738370 | Urmston et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4747500 | Gach et al. | May 1988 | A |
4747502 | Luenser | May 1988 | A |
4754890 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4754892 | Retief | Jul 1988 | A |
4757914 | Roth et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4764403 | Ajmera | Aug 1988 | A |
4778698 | Ou-Yang | Oct 1988 | A |
4779750 | Armstrong | Oct 1988 | A |
4782968 | Hayes | Nov 1988 | A |
4801037 | Hayashida et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4807745 | Langley et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807770 | Barriac | Feb 1989 | A |
4809858 | Ochs | Mar 1989 | A |
4810541 | Newman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4815617 | Cullum | Mar 1989 | A |
4818577 | Ou-Yang | Apr 1989 | A |
4842951 | Yamada et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4846359 | Baird et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4875594 | Ochs | Oct 1989 | A |
4879147 | Newman et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4881649 | Hsu et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4892911 | Genske | Jan 1990 | A |
4893718 | Delespaul et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4894266 | Bauer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896783 | Leoncavallo et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4935273 | Ou-Yang | Jun 1990 | A |
4981229 | Lanham | Jan 1991 | A |
4981230 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991731 | Osip et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4997097 | Krautkramer | Mar 1991 | A |
5002811 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006384 | Genske | Apr 1991 | A |
5007546 | Rose et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009323 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009324 | Ochs | Apr 1991 | A |
5011719 | Gehrke et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5012946 | McCarthy | May 1991 | A |
5023121 | Pockat et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031787 | Ochs | Jul 1991 | A |
5058755 | Hayes | Oct 1991 | A |
5061532 | Yamada | Oct 1991 | A |
5069355 | Matuszak | Dec 1991 | A |
5071686 | Genske et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078290 | Ochs | Jan 1992 | A |
5092469 | Takata et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5093164 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110642 | Genske | May 1992 | A |
5135125 | Andel et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151317 | Bothe | Sep 1992 | A |
5160767 | Genske et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175035 | Pinsolle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176271 | Painchaud et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178293 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197618 | Goth | Mar 1993 | A |
5197620 | Gregory | Mar 1993 | A |
5197621 | Bartl et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5255813 | Berggren et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258191 | Hayes | Nov 1993 | A |
5259522 | Morton | Nov 1993 | A |
5265745 | Pereyra et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5302442 | O'Brien et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5342684 | Carespodi | Aug 1994 | A |
5346082 | Ochs et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5381913 | Peeters | Jan 1995 | A |
5407751 | Genske et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415306 | Luch et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421470 | Dudzik | Jun 1995 | A |
5433992 | Galda et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447792 | Brandt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469968 | Matthews et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5492757 | Schuhmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500265 | Ambroise et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513781 | Ullrich et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523136 | Fischer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533622 | Stockley, III et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551608 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5615789 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626929 | Stevenson | May 1997 | A |
5664694 | Bietzer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685443 | Taber et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702015 | Giles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720401 | Moore | Feb 1998 | A |
5723507 | Markovich et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738231 | Montgomery | Apr 1998 | A |
5756178 | Obadia | May 1998 | A |
5773136 | Alder et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785195 | Zwemer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788101 | King | Aug 1998 | A |
5837369 | Grunberger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850951 | Hayes | Dec 1998 | A |
5851640 | Schuhmann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860544 | Brucker | Jan 1999 | A |
5862928 | Breuer et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875909 | Guglielmini | Mar 1999 | A |
5882789 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884788 | Wilde | Mar 1999 | A |
5902075 | Krings | May 1999 | A |
5915577 | Levine | Jun 1999 | A |
5925430 | Bayer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927530 | Moore | Jul 1999 | A |
5929128 | Whetten et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947311 | Gregory | Sep 1999 | A |
5973077 | Kan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992661 | Zumbuhl et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997968 | Dries et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006930 | Dreyer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044994 | Miller | Apr 2000 | A |
6056136 | Taber et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056141 | Navarini et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068933 | Shepard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082566 | Yousif et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6082568 | Flanagan | Jul 2000 | A |
6089390 | Druitt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105800 | Czesak | Aug 2000 | A |
6119422 | Clear et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119883 | Hock et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123212 | Russell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6152316 | Niese | Nov 2000 | A |
6152319 | Kamachi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158604 | Larguia, Sr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165576 | Freedman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179139 | Heilman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202871 | Kelly | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206871 | Zanon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220466 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231975 | Kong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234338 | Searle | May 2001 | B1 |
6235822 | Whetten et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237789 | Zhu | May 2001 | B1 |
6239210 | Kim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253939 | Wan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6253940 | Graham et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257430 | Rinnie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265083 | Tanizaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276543 | German et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277478 | Kurita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302321 | Reese et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315140 | Nadel | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6382443 | Gregory | May 2002 | B1 |
6382445 | McCandless | May 2002 | B1 |
6419101 | Hessel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477823 | Kitterman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488165 | Hidding | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502710 | Bosl et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6659297 | Gregory et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6848590 | Brozell et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854614 | Sprick | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6874647 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893672 | Ingraham | May 2005 | B2 |
6902075 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913157 | Oh | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6948630 | Julian et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7004340 | Belden, Jr. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021478 | Hock | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7168581 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175039 | German et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7217454 | Smelko et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20010012868 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020027123 | Druitt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020066713 | Ma | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020162818 | Williams | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030071007 | Ma et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098285 | Gregory et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030116524 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030150833 | Shenkar | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040055992 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040173944 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050003125 | Barber et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050048233 | Nomula | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077297 | Marshburn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050077298 | Nomula | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129969 | Schell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050211657 | Mallet et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242097 | Morin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284837 | Taber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070125785 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138125 | Granger | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070187352 | Kras et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2572379 | Dec 2006 | CA |
3237634 | Apr 1984 | DE |
4206244 | Sep 1993 | DE |
160978 | Nov 1985 | EP |
207626 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0269920 | Jun 1988 | EP |
275102 | Jul 1988 | EP |
324260 | Jul 1989 | EP |
405365 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0421821 | Apr 1991 | EP |
589033 | Mar 1998 | EP |
2034288 | Jun 1980 | GB |
2130574 | Jun 1984 | GB |
01058675 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01240463 | Sep 1989 | JP |
01308772 | Dec 1989 | JP |
02205574 | Aug 1990 | JP |
02219769 | Sep 1990 | JP |
2000052982 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001261054 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2006027621 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006044743 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006052004 | Feb 2006 | JP |
9009935 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO-2006002922 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2007042205 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60602391 | Aug 2004 | US |