Heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7798359
  • Patent Number
    7,798,359
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 28, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 21, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
Heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging. The membrane includes a plastic layer laminated to a foil layer with a first adhesive layer. A co-extruded layer is laminated to the foil layer with a second adhesive layer. The co-extruded layer is formed with a plastic body co-extruded with a heat-sealable sealing resin layer.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

One or more aspects of the invention relate generally to package sealing lidstock and more particularly, to a novel heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for use in high temperature retortable packaging.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Packaged foodstuffs, medicines, and the like can be contaminated during processing. Accordingly, they are often treated subsequent to the packaging operation to reduce spoilage. For some products which are especially susceptible to spoilage, these processes include sterilization, pasteurization, and the like. These processes are often performed in retorts under elevated conditions of heat and temperature for specified, often prolonged periods of time.


Where it is desirable to provide packaging in the form of rigid containers, it is often desirable to seal the package with a membrane or film. This membrane serves several purposes. It prevents tampering and pilfering of the container's contents. It assures continued cleanliness of the container's interior as well as the contents therein. Moreover, it can prevent gases, such as oxygen, from entering the package. Finally, it can serve as a label to identify and market the manufacturer's product.


One commonly practiced method for implementing such a sealing membrane is to provide one surface thereof with a sealing resin which can be adhered to the rigid container during processing. Such resins must be approved for direct food contact. The membrane is bonded to a rim about an opening on the container by activating the resin, often by means of heat. One methodology for providing this bonding heat is by induction sealing.


Induction sealing is generally performed by an inductive coil inside a sealing apparatus. The coil creates an electromagnetic field when it is energized by an electric current. The electromagnetic field causes an aluminum foil layer disposed in the lidstock to heat. This heating causes a resin coating, generally applied to the foil, to melt and adhere to the lip or rim of the container opening, thereby forming a seal between the lidstock and the container. When the container leaves the electromagnetic field, the foil cools, and the seal between the lidstock and the container is completed.


Early closure membranes required the user to cut into the membrane to open the container. For reasons of consumer convenience, it is now often desirable that such membranes be readily peelable from the container in order to provide access to the material stored therein. Examples of such implementations include, but are not limited to, dietary supplements, single serving convenience foods, and the like.


The foregoing examples of peelable lidstock membranes further illustrate a problem with existing technology. Where a peelable lidstock is utilized to package many foodstuffs, including adult dietary supplements, baby formula, and the like, an especially high degree of seal reliability is required. This is due to the fact that many such foodstuffs serve as excellent culture media for spoilage and pathological microorganisms, and infants and the elderly generally have lessened resistance to infection. To ensure that a healthy product is produced, many such foodstuffs are heat-treated in retorts subsequent to filling and sealing. With existing technologies, the heat used in retorting the packaged product often leads to softening of the sealing resins with concomitant loss of seal integrity and higher seal failures. In at least one application, the maximum acceptable failure rate is three failures per million containers.


A further problem with existing retortable lidding membranes is the removal thereof from the containers to which they are applied. The typically encountered induction sealed membrane is often substantially equal in form and size to the container to which it is applied, and is generally not substantially larger than that outer diameter. Accordingly, it is usually somewhat awkward to remove such membranes, as there is often no substantial “handle”, or removal feature, to remove the membrane.


One possible solution to this latter problem was the development of asymmetrical membranes, where the asymmetry provided a tab which extended substantially beyond the rim of the container, providing the requisite “handle” for removal of the membrane. An example of this methodology is the use of oval membranes over round openings. The problem with using this methodology in induction sealed membranes is that the induction energy used during the sealing process tends to follow the rim of the foil and not along the mass of the container rim. Accordingly, the energy available for sealing is substantially diminished at the container/seal juncture in the region of the asymmetry. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this leads to increased seal failures at the region of asymmetry, with concomitant increases in product leakage and spoilage.


Accordingly, it would be desirable and useful to provide a heat-sealable, peelable lidding membrane suitable for retort packaging.


It would be further desirable and useful to provide a heat-sealable, peelable lidding membrane suitable for retort packaging which incorporates an easy removal feature therewith.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a peelable seal for a container including a plurality of layers bonded or laminated together.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a peelable seal for a container which withstands retort packaging without damage to the seal.


It is also an object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane of laminated construction wherein the bond and the construction is both chemical and mechanical through heat, co-extrusion or conduction/induction seal.


It a further object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane of laminated construction wherein the topmost layer is made of material that has the strength and thickness such that it will tear before it separates from an adjacent layer.


It is even a further object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane of laminated construction so that when subjected to retort packaging the membrane does not tear nor delaminate under retort processing.


It is even another object of the present invention to provide a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane which is weak enough to be peelable but strong enough to survive retort processing.


More particularly, the present invention is a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane that is subjected to retort packaging wherein the membrane includes a top layer, preferably a plastic layer, laminated to a foil layer with a first adhesive. A co-extruded layer is laminated to the foil layer with a second adhesive, the co-extruded layer having a plastic body co-extruded with a heat-sealable sealing resin layer.


Even more particularly, the present invention is a heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for sterilizable packaging including a sealant layer structure wherein the sealant layer structure is bondable to a container lip with a strength sufficient to allow the sealant layer to remain with the container when the seal is peeled free. The sealant layer is also capable of tearing at the periphery of the container lip when the seal is peeled free. A sealant layer backup structure is also provided which is co-extrusion bonded to the sealant layer with a strength sufficient to fracture the sealant layer at or near the periphery of the container lip during peeling of the complete membrane and delaminates from the sealant layer adjacent the container sealing lip. The sealant layer backup structure has a tear resistance sufficient to achieve the fracture and delamination and is comprised of one or more layers which may be co-extrusion or adhesive bonded together.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings show exemplary embodiments in accordance with one or more aspects of the invention; however, the accompanying drawings should not be taken to limit the invention to the embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.



FIG. 1 is a sectional diagram depicting an exemplary embodiment of a heat-sealable membrane.



FIG. 2 is a sectional diagram depicting a heat-sealable membrane arrayed within a container cap.



FIG. 3 is a sectional diagram depicting the employment of a heat-sealable membrane and a cap seal within a container cap.



FIGS. 4 and 5 are sectional diagrams respectively depicting alternate exemplary embodiments of a heat-sealable membrane, including a printable surface.



FIG. 6 is a perspective diagram depicting an exemplary embodiment of a heat-sealable membrane incorporating a removal feature.



FIG. 7 is a sectional diagram depicting an exemplary embodiment of a heat-sealable membrane incorporating another removal feature.



FIG. 8 is a sectional diagram depicting the employment of a heat-sealable membrane incorporating an alternate removal feature and a cap seal within a container cap.



FIG. 9 is a sectional diagram depicting a co-extruded layer.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a sectional diagram depicting one preferred embodiment of a heat-sealable membrane 100 of the present invention. In this embodiment, membrane 100 includes a first layer 102 formed of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polyester laminated with a first adhesive layer 104 to a foil layer 106. This laminate is subsequently laminated with a second adhesive layer 108 to a co-extruded polyethylene/copolymer, preferably a linear medium density polyethylene/copolymer sealant film as indicated by the numeral 110, sometimes referred to herein as co-ex layer 110. Co-ex layer 110 is described in further detail below.


In this preferred embodiment, layer 102 may be implemented as a 100-200 gauge (PET) or polyester layer laminated with a solventless or waterbase or solvent-based first adhesive 104 to a 1.0 to 2.0 mil aluminum foil layer 106. A preferred adhesive is a polyurethane based adhesive cured with an isocyanate based curing agent. One such adhesive/curing agent pair found to be suitable is Liofol® UR2780-US cured with Liofol® UR5891-US curing agent, available from Liofol Company, 407 Gregson Drive, Cary, N.C. These components are mixed in the ratio of five parts adhesive to one part curing agent. The mixed adhesive may be diluted with a solvent to provide a desired coat weight. Such solvents for this particular adhesive include, but are not necessarily limited to ethyl acetate, acetone, and methyl ethyl ketone. In one embodiment, a diluted adhesive includes 62% adhesive base, 13% curing agent, and 25% acetone. Conventionally, water-based adhesives have been used for lidstock membranes involving direct food contact; however, such water-based adhesives may lack laminate integrity thereby negatively impacting seal reliability. In contrast, this embodiment employs a solvent-based adhesive that improves seal reliability over that afforded by conventional water-based adhesives. Though a particular solvent-based adhesive is disclosed herein, other known solvent-based adhesives may be used. Moreover, adhesives other than solvent-based adhesives may be used if they provide sufficient seal reliability after being subjected to retort processing.


Laminating equipment is used to apply an adhesive, such as a diluted adhesive, to PET layer 102 at a dry coat weight of 2 to 3 lbs per ream. The use of adhesive at normal weights found in the sealing industry was found to provide inadequate lamination reliability between the several layers of membrane 100. This dry coat weight is in excess of conventional dry coat weights. Solvent content may be modified as required to attain this coat weight. Various PET or polyester films are formed with at least one side treated to improve adhesion. Where layer 102 is so formed, adhesive 104 is applied to that side. Similarly, aluminum foil is often formed with one polished side and one side which has a matte finish. Where foil layer 106 is provided with at least one polished side, that side is laminated facing the PET or polyester layer 102 when used in retortable packaging.


While a membrane may be formed in a number of temperature applications regimes, in one embodiment, lamination was conducted at 40° to 50° C. Alternative lamination temperatures may be employed. Subsequent to this first lamination step, a curing step may be used. In one embodiment, the laminate roll is removed from the laminating equipment and cured at a temperature of approximately 5° to 10° C. above ambient temperature for a period of approximately three weeks.


Co-ex layer 110 is a polyethylene film, preferably a linear medium-density polyethylene co-extruded with a combination of propylene and/or ethylene co-polymer resins. Having reference now to FIG. 9, in another embodiment, co-ex layer 110 is formed by co-extruding a medium-density polyethylene (MDPE), preferably a linear medium-density polyethylene (LMDPE) stratum 902 in contact with a low density polyethylene (LDPE) stratum 904, which is in turn in contact with a different polypropylene containing sealing resin layer 906. Desirable characteristics for sealing resin layer 906 are high softness and low modulus, ability to permanently bond to the container lip material, ability to be extrusion bonded to layer 904 with sufficient strength to withstand retort but weak enough to be separated from a peel force of 2-6 lbs. after retort and with a high melt flow. Extrusion bonding or co-extrusion, as it is often referred to, involves melting and squirting out two different materials against one another normally achieving a weak or strong, mechanical or chemical bond between the two, depending upon the similarities between the materials and the temperatures, pressures or other process conditions. When membrane 100 is peeled from the rim of the container to which it is applied, not shown in FIG. 9, co-ex layer 110 has unique cohesive strengths such that it de-laminates at the juncture between stratum 904 and stratum 906 above the container sealing land, and stratum 906. Fractures at the periphery of the sealing land so that a minimum amount is visible to the consumer as strata 902 and 904 are removed from stratum 906. Alternatively, the sealant may be colored to leave a visible evidence to show a seal has been achieved or it might be colored to the same general color as the bottle to hide any discoloration in the bottle lip. This de-lamination layer also serves to seal over any layers in the bottle for instant regrind, barrier layers or adhesive layers in multi-layered containers. This delicate de-laminate/fracture balance characteristic is provided by preciously manipulating the layers and exact materials and thicknesses based on the container material, the closure clamping forces, and the specific retort conditions such as temperatures and pressures which are to be expected. While the principles enumerated herein contemplate the use of a number of combinations of appropriate resins to form co-ex layer 110, in one embodiment, the polyethylene or preferably LMDPE stratum 902 is formed of Dowlex® 2038 blended with Dow LDPE 501I, and LDPE is formed of Dow LDPE 501I. Dow LDPE resins are available from The Dow Chemical Company, 2030 Dow Center, Midland, Mich. Sealing resins stratum 906, in this embodiment, may be formed of Basell Adflex® KS 353P, or AdFlex® Q 100F available from Basell North America Inc., 912 Appleton Road, Elkton, Md. In this embodiment, co-ex layer 110 is formed with the outside of polyethylene stratum 902, preferably a LMDPE, treated to promote adhesion with adhesive 108, not shown, in FIG. 9.


Subsequent to the previously discussed first curing, the laminate roll is remounted into laminating equipment and co-ex layer 110 is laminated to foil layer 106 utilizing adhesive 108. Adhesive 108 may be the previously discussed Liofol® UR2780/UR5891 adhesive system, applied at 2 to 3 lbs, per ream dry coat weight.


After lamination, the roll of membrane is again removed from the laminating equipment and cured for a period of approximately two weeks at approximately 5°-10° C. above ambient temperature. Following the second curing, the roll of laminate membrane is ready for such forming steps as dictated by the packaging application. These steps include, but are not limited to, cutting, slitting, die-cutting, imprinting, and the like.


In one application, membrane 100 can be implemented as a part of a sealing system for sealing necked bottles or the like with screw-caps. Such an application is shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, where membrane 100 is put in contact with a cap assembly including a cap 200 and a cap seal 202. Membrane 100 is immediately adjacent cap seal 202. Cap seal 202 is typically formed in accordance with known packaging methods. In this example, cap seal 202 is formed of a polypropylene layer 204 laminated to a thermoplastic elastomer layer 206. Continuing, the above embodiment, membrane 100 is disposed over opening 212 in neck 214 of container 210 and PET or polyester layer 102 is disposed in contact with elastomer layer 206 of cap seal 202. Subsequent to the filling of the container, not shown in this illustration, cap 200 is fitted thereto, and the previously discussed induction sealing is conducted. Induction sealing heats foil layer 106, which in turn heats the sealing resins formed as part of co-ex layer 110. The heated sealing resins form a peelable seal with the rim of the container, and as induction energy is de-activated, the cooling of the sealing resins perfects the seal between peelable membrane 100 and the container rim.


Additionally, the peelable sealing membrane may have imprint images or messages on an upper surface of membrane 100. This may be effected by simply imprinting on an upper surface of PET or polyester layer 102. Alternatively, and as shown in FIG. 4, imprinting of the underside of transparent layer 102 may be completed prior to lamination, for instance, as shown by ink layer 402. A further alternative is shown in FIG. 5, where an ink layer, identifiable as 502, is formed on an upper surface of the PET or polyester layer 102, and another transparent or translucent layer 504 is laminated over layer 102. In one embodiment, layer 504 is implemented as a layer of 48 gauge PET or polyester. Again, the previously discussed Liofol® UR2780/UR5891 adhesive or the like, not shown in this illustration, may be implemented to effect the lamination of layers 102 and 504. Membrane 100 is available form Momar Industries, 645 Edison Way, Reno, Nev., as Propeel™ 502 R2S.


In another embodiment of membrane 100, a peelable sealing membrane is provided by including a removal feature. In this embodiment, a Unipac™, or Lift-n-Peel™, available from Unipac Corporation, 125 Edward Street, Aurora, Ontario, Canada, L4G 1W3 is used, an example of which is shown in FIG. 6. With continued reference to FIG. 6 and renewed reference to FIG. 1, a peelable sealing membrane 600 is described. Top-Tab™ or Lift-n-Peel™ includes a handle layer 602 laminated to an upper surface of membrane 100. The Top Tab™ or Lift-n-Peel™ may be laminated over PET or polyester layer 102, or optionally, may replace PET or polyester layer 102. Handle layer 602 is defined by two regions. Region 604 of handle layer 602 is firmly adhered to membrane 100. Region 606, while initially deployed in contact with membrane 100, is adhered thereto by a readily releasable adhesive. A user can readily lift region 606 from membrane 100, whereupon region 606 forms a convenient tab for peeling membrane 100 from the rim of a container, not shown.


An alternate removal feature is shown in FIG. 7. It will be appreciated that the aspect shown and discussed at FIG. 1 is a substantially flexible membrane. By replacing layer 102 thereof with a substantially stiff, thickened layer 702, membrane 700 may be easily removed from a container in the following manner. A user pushes upwardly on stiff layer 702 with a thumb or fingernail. Stiff layer 702 may be implemented with a number of substantially stiff materials suitable for sealing. These include papers, cardboards, plastics, composites thereof, and the like. In this embodiment, layer 702 is formed of a 10 mil. layer of talc-filled polypropylene in place of layer 102. The substantially stiff nature of layer 702 causes membrane 700 itself to act as a lever, and thereby easily peelable from the rim of the container, not shown, to which it is sealed. This aspect is available as the “Flickit”™ seal from Momar Industries, 645 Edison Way, Reno, Nev.


While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that regarding asymmetrical sealing membranes the induction energy used during the sealing process tends to follow the rim of the foil and not along the mass of the container rim. Accordingly, the energy available for sealing is substantially diminished at the container/seal juncture in the region of the asymmetry. This leads to increased seal failures, with concomitant increases in product leakage and spoilage.



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional diagram depicting the employment of a heat-sealable membrane incorporating an alternate removal feature and a cap seal within a container cap. Membrane 800 is deployed for sealing a container 210. Membrane 800 includes a polyethylene layer 802 laminated to a 1 to 3 mil PET or polyester layer 806 with adhesive layer 804. This in turn is laminated to a co-ex sealing layer 810 with another adhesive layer 808. Adhesive layers 804 and 808 may be implemented with a number of adhesive products, including the previously discussed Liofol® UR2780/UR5891 adhesive system. Membrane 800 is formed with an asymmetry, for instance a tab 812. Tab 812 provides a convenient removal feature for removing membrane 800 from container 210. It should be noted that there is no foil layer in membrane 800, nor in tab 812 thereof. Instead, the foil used for induction sealing is formed as part of cap seal 820. In this embodiment, cap seal 820 used in operative combination with membrane 800 is formed of 0.5 to 2.0 mil aluminum foil layer 822 laminated to a polyethylene layer 824. This lamination may be performed with standard lamination equipment implementing the previously discussed Liofol® UR2780/UR5891 adhesive system or the like.


This implementation provides a convenient pull tab to remove peelable membrane 800, while it avoids the previously discussed problem of induction energy applied to asymmetrical foils. Again, not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this is due to the fact that while membrane 800 is itself asymmetrical, foil layer 822 of the cap seal is substantially symmetrical with respect to the geometry of the rim of container 210. Foil layer 822, heated upon the application of induction energy, heats membrane 800 as previously discussed, and enhances the seal between membrane 800 and container 210, without the aforementioned problems with reduced seal energy and integrity at tab 812.


While the foregoing describes exemplary embodiments in accordance with one or more aspects of the invention, other and further embodiments in accordance with the one or more aspects of the invention may be devised without departing from the scope thereof, which is determined by the claims that follow and equivalents thereof. Claims listing steps do not imply any order of the steps. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners, as noted.

Claims
  • 1. A heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging comprising: a top layer wherein said top layer prevents tearing of said membrane during removal from a container;a foil layer laminated to said top layer with a first adhesive layer;a co-extruded layer affixed directly to said foil layer with a second adhesive layer, said co-extruded layer having a plastic body co-extruded with a heat-sealable sealing resin layer, wherein said heat-sealable sealing resin layer is adapted to sealingly engage a container rim surrounding a container opening; andwherein said co-extruded plastic body of said co-extruded layer has a low density polyethylene layer and a linear medium-density polyethylene layer, wherein said low density polyethylene layer is co-extruded between said co-extruded linear medium-density polyethylene layer and said co-extruded heat-sealable sealing resin layer, wherein said plastic body of said co-extruded layer prevents tearing of said co-extruded layer and causes fracture and delamination of said heat-sealable sealing resin layer from said container rim when said heat-sealed peelable lidding membrane is removed from said container rim.
  • 2. The membrane of claim 1, wherein said top layer is a plastic layer.
  • 3. The membrane of claim 2, wherein said plastic layer is a polyethylene terephthalate or a polyester.
  • 4. The membrane of claim 1, wherein said first adhesive layer is a polyurethane based adhesive cured with an isocyanate based curing agent.
  • 5. The membrane of claim 1, wherein said foil layer being aluminum foil.
  • 6. The membrane of claim 1, wherein said second adhesive being a polyurethane based adhesive cured with an isocyanate based curing agent.
  • 7. The membrane of claim 1, wherein said top layer being a layer of relatively stiff material.
  • 8. The membrane of claim 7, wherein said stiff material being a paper, a cardboard, a plastic, or a composite thereof.
  • 9. The membrane of claim 7, wherein said stiff material is a layer of talc-filled polypropylene.
  • 10. The membrane of claim 1 including a transparent layer adhesively secured to said top layer.
  • 11. The membrane of claim 10, wherein said top layer includes an ink layer.
  • 12. A combination of a cap and a container for retort processing of a package comprising: a cap adapted to be received by a container neck of said container, said cap having a cap seal including a plastic layer and an elastomer layer;said container having a heat sealed, peelable lidding membrane covering an opening in said container neck, said membrane including a top layer, a foil layer laminated to said top layer with a first adhesive layer, and a co-extruded layer affixed directly to said foil layer with a second adhesive layer, said co-extruded layer having a plastic body co-extruded with a heat sealable sealing resin layer, wherein said heat sealable sealing resin layer engages a rim surrounding said opening in said container neck; andwherein said co-extruded plastic body of said co-extruded layer has a low density polyethylene layer and a linear medium-density polyethylene layer, wherein said low density polyethylene layer is co-extruded between said co-extruded linear medium-density polyethylene layer and said co-extruded heat-sealable sealing resin layer, wherein said co-extruded plastic body of said co-extruded layer prevents tearing of said co-extruded layer and causes fracture and delamination of said heat-sealable sealing resin layer from said rim of said container opening.
  • 13. The combination of claim 12, wherein said top layer is a second plastic layer.
  • 14. The combination of claim 13, wherein said second plastic layer is a polyethylene terephthalate or a polyester.
  • 15. The combination of claim 12, wherein said first adhesive layer is a polyurethane based adhesive cured with an isocyanate based curing agent.
  • 16. The combination of claim 12, wherein said foil layer being aluminum foil.
  • 17. The combination of claim 12, wherein said second adhesive being a polyurethane based adhesive cured with an isocyanate based curing agent.
  • 18. The combination of claim 12, wherein said top layer being a layer of relatively stiff material.
  • 19. The combination of claim 18, wherein said stiff material being a paper, a cardboard, a plastic or a composite thereof.
  • 20. The combination of claim 18, wherein said stiff material is a layer of talc-filled polypropylene.
  • 21. The combination of claim 12, including a transparent layer adhesively secured to said top layer.
  • 22. The combination of claim 21, wherein said top layer includes an ink layer.
  • 23. A heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging including a sealant layer structure comprising: a top layer wherein said top layer prevents tearing of said membrane during removal from a container, a foil layer laminated to said top layer with a first adhesive layer, and a co-extruded layer affixed directly to said foil layer with a second adhesive layer;said co-extruded layer including a plastic body and a sealant layer, said sealant layer bondable to a container lip of said container with a strength sufficient to allow said sealant layer to remain with said container when the membrane is peeled free from said container lip;said sealant layer being capable of tearing at the periphery of said container lip when the membrane is peeled free from said container lip; andsaid plastic body of said co-extruded layer has a low density polyethylene layer and a linear medium-density polyethylene layer, wherein said low density polyethylene layer is co-extruded between said co-extruded linear medium-density polyethylene layer and said co-extruded sealant layer, said plastic body co-extrusion bonded to said sealant layer with a strength sufficient to fracture said sealant layer at or near the periphery of said container lip during peeling of said complete membrane and delaminates from said sealant layer adjacent said container lip, said plastic body of said co-extruded layer having a tear resistance sufficient to achieve fracture and delamination of said sealing resin layer from said container lip.
  • 24. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein said sealant layer is colored.
  • 25. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein the peel force is from about 2 to 6 pounds.
  • 26. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein said top layer is a polyethylene terephthalate or polyester layer.
  • 27. The heat-sealed peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 26 wherein said polyethylene terephthalate or polyester layer includes at least one pull tab.
  • 28. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein said top layer includes at least one pull tab.
  • 29. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein said top layer is stiff enough for said peelable membrane to be removed without the use of a pinching grip motion.
  • 30. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein said first adhesive layer or said second adhesive layer is a solventless adhesive.
  • 31. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 further comprising a secondary resilient backup structure, said secondary resilient backup structure being separate and not bonded to the rest of the peelable membrane structure, said secondary resilient backup structure may be a homogeneous material or include multiple layers coextruded or adhesive bonded together, said secondary structure may be separated from or integral with a closure and is flexible and resilient.
  • 32. The membrane of claim 1, wherein said first adhesive or said second adhesive is a solventless adhesive.
  • 33. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 23 wherein said top layer is a layer of relatively stiff material.
  • 34. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 33 wherein said stiff material is a paper, a cardboard, a plastic or a composite thereof.
  • 35. The heat-sealed, peelable lidding membrane for retort packaging of claim 33 wherein said stiff material is a layer of talc-filled polypropylene.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a utility patent application and claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) and priority to provisional patent application No. 60/602,391 filed Aug. 17, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (289)
Number Name Date Kind
1346112 Bruns Jul 1920 A
1556020 Noll Oct 1925 A
1910913 Conner May 1933 A
1916977 Gutmann Jul 1933 A
1937492 Merolle Nov 1933 A
1961033 Bricks May 1934 A
1995350 Hoag Mar 1935 A
2039757 Von Till May 1936 A
2085934 Von Till Jul 1937 A
2188946 Gutmann Feb 1940 A
2242256 McManus May 1941 A
2312513 Wilson Mar 1943 A
2620939 Weisgerber Dec 1952 A
2643021 Freedman Jun 1953 A
2670869 Martin Mar 1954 A
2681742 Miller Jun 1954 A
2686606 Froitzheim Aug 1954 A
2686607 Froitzheim Aug 1954 A
2748969 Leary Jun 1956 A
2904837 Crabbe Sep 1959 A
2929525 Glover et al. Mar 1960 A
3143364 Klein Aug 1964 A
3169656 Wieckmann Feb 1965 A
3186209 Friedman Jun 1965 A
3189209 Owens Jun 1965 A
3224617 Hohl Dec 1965 A
3245857 Rutledge Apr 1966 A
3255907 Eddy Jun 1966 A
3266658 Meissner Aug 1966 A
3331523 Exton Jul 1967 A
3360149 Roth Dec 1967 A
3501042 Risch Mar 1970 A
3527372 Manning Sep 1970 A
3530917 Donovan Sep 1970 A
3547294 Williams Dec 1970 A
3612325 Williams Oct 1971 A
3632004 Grimes et al. Jan 1972 A
3788510 Collins Jan 1974 A
3815314 Pollock et al. Jun 1974 A
3823182 Nonaka et al. Jul 1974 A
3845525 Gaylord Nov 1974 A
3879492 Bontinick Apr 1975 A
3910410 Shaw Oct 1975 A
3917100 Dukess Nov 1975 A
3923179 Choksi Dec 1975 A
3923182 Choksi Dec 1975 A
3923183 Choksi Dec 1975 A
3923184 Choksi Dec 1975 A
3923185 Choksi Dec 1975 A
3944103 Cros Mar 1976 A
3980194 Costa Sep 1976 A
4007848 Snyder Feb 1977 A
4009793 Minesinger et al. Mar 1977 A
4013188 Ray Mar 1977 A
4066181 Robinson et al. Jan 1978 A
4076152 Mumford Feb 1978 A
4091949 Fowles et al. May 1978 A
4093093 Fowles et al. Jun 1978 A
4109815 Collins, III Aug 1978 A
4128184 Northup Dec 1978 A
4151924 Jameson May 1979 A
4181232 Bellamy et al. Jan 1980 A
4204604 Morin et al. May 1980 A
4207990 Weiler et al. Jun 1980 A
4209126 Elias Jun 1980 A
4266687 Cummings May 1981 A
4275817 Patton Jun 1981 A
4276989 Hicks Jul 1981 A
4280653 Elias Jul 1981 A
4358919 Hirota et al. Nov 1982 A
4364485 Knapp Dec 1982 A
4369889 Ostrowsky Jan 1983 A
4378894 Willis et al. Apr 1983 A
4381840 Ostrowsky May 1983 A
4382521 Ostrowsky May 1983 A
4392579 Uhlig et al. Jul 1983 A
4423821 McIntosh Jan 1984 A
4427126 Ostrowsky Jan 1984 A
4430288 Bonis Feb 1984 A
4434904 D'Amico et al. Mar 1984 A
4457440 Dukess Jul 1984 A
4473163 Geiger Sep 1984 A
4493427 Wolkonsky Jan 1985 A
4496674 Ehrhart et al. Jan 1985 A
4501371 Smalley Feb 1985 A
4526279 Weiler et al. Jul 1985 A
4527705 Prades Jul 1985 A
4564117 Herbert Jan 1986 A
4576297 Larson Mar 1986 A
4583665 Barriac Apr 1986 A
4588099 Diez May 1986 A
4625875 Carr et al. Dec 1986 A
4637519 Dutt et al. Jan 1987 A
4638913 Howe Jan 1987 A
4643330 Kennedy Feb 1987 A
4648520 Stull Mar 1987 A
4651886 Stull Mar 1987 A
4662529 Moore May 1987 A
4668458 Whitney May 1987 A
4674642 Towns et al. Jun 1987 A
4674643 Wilde et al. Jun 1987 A
4682463 Foldesi Jul 1987 A
4683016 Dutt et al. Jul 1987 A
4704180 Marsella et al. Nov 1987 A
4705188 Rahn Nov 1987 A
4706835 Kreiseder Nov 1987 A
4721215 Bertaud Jan 1988 A
4722447 Crisci Feb 1988 A
4723685 Fillmore et al. Feb 1988 A
4730748 Bane Mar 1988 A
4738370 Urmston et al. Apr 1988 A
4747500 Gach et al. May 1988 A
4747502 Luenser May 1988 A
4754890 Ullman et al. Jul 1988 A
4754892 Retief Jul 1988 A
4757914 Roth et al. Jul 1988 A
4764403 Ajmera Aug 1988 A
4778698 Ou-Yang Oct 1988 A
4779750 Armstrong Oct 1988 A
4782968 Hayes Nov 1988 A
4801037 Hayashida et al. Jan 1989 A
4807745 Langley et al. Feb 1989 A
4807770 Barriac Feb 1989 A
4809858 Ochs Mar 1989 A
4810541 Newman et al. Mar 1989 A
4815617 Cullum Mar 1989 A
4818577 Ou-Yang Apr 1989 A
4842951 Yamada et al. Jun 1989 A
4846359 Baird et al. Jul 1989 A
4875594 Ochs Oct 1989 A
4879147 Newman et al. Nov 1989 A
4881649 Hsu et al. Nov 1989 A
4892911 Genske Jan 1990 A
4893718 Delespaul et al. Jan 1990 A
4894266 Bauer et al. Jan 1990 A
4896783 Leoncavallo et al. Jan 1990 A
4935273 Ou-Yang Jun 1990 A
4981229 Lanham Jan 1991 A
4981230 Marshall et al. Jan 1991 A
4991731 Osip et al. Feb 1991 A
4997097 Krautkramer Mar 1991 A
5002811 Bauer et al. Mar 1991 A
5006384 Genske Apr 1991 A
5007546 Rose et al. Apr 1991 A
5009323 Montgomery et al. Apr 1991 A
5009324 Ochs Apr 1991 A
5011719 Gehrke et al. Apr 1991 A
5012946 McCarthy May 1991 A
5023121 Pockat et al. Jun 1991 A
5031787 Ochs Jul 1991 A
5058755 Hayes Oct 1991 A
5061532 Yamada Oct 1991 A
5069355 Matuszak Dec 1991 A
5071686 Genske et al. Dec 1991 A
5078290 Ochs Jan 1992 A
5092469 Takata et al. Mar 1992 A
5093164 Bauer et al. Mar 1992 A
5110642 Genske May 1992 A
5135125 Andel et al. Aug 1992 A
5151317 Bothe Sep 1992 A
5160767 Genske et al. Nov 1992 A
5175035 Pinsolle et al. Dec 1992 A
5176271 Painchaud et al. Jan 1993 A
5178293 Suzuki et al. Jan 1993 A
5197618 Goth Mar 1993 A
5197620 Gregory Mar 1993 A
5197621 Bartl et al. Mar 1993 A
5255813 Berggren et al. Oct 1993 A
5258191 Hayes Nov 1993 A
5259522 Morton Nov 1993 A
5265745 Pereyra et al. Nov 1993 A
5302442 O'Brien et al. Apr 1994 A
5342684 Carespodi Aug 1994 A
5346082 Ochs et al. Sep 1994 A
5381913 Peeters Jan 1995 A
5407751 Genske et al. Apr 1995 A
5415306 Luch et al. May 1995 A
5421470 Dudzik Jun 1995 A
5433992 Galda et al. Jul 1995 A
5447792 Brandt et al. Sep 1995 A
5469968 Matthews et al. Nov 1995 A
5492757 Schuhmann et al. Feb 1996 A
5500265 Ambroise et al. Mar 1996 A
5513781 Ullrich et al. May 1996 A
5523136 Fischer et al. Jun 1996 A
5533622 Stockley, III et al. Jul 1996 A
5551608 Moore et al. Sep 1996 A
5615789 Finkelstein et al. Apr 1997 A
5626929 Stevenson May 1997 A
5664694 Bietzer et al. Sep 1997 A
5685443 Taber et al. Nov 1997 A
5702015 Giles et al. Dec 1997 A
5720401 Moore Feb 1998 A
5723507 Markovich et al. Mar 1998 A
5738231 Montgomery Apr 1998 A
5756178 Obadia May 1998 A
5773136 Alder et al. Jun 1998 A
5785195 Zwemer et al. Jul 1998 A
5788101 King Aug 1998 A
5837369 Grunberger et al. Nov 1998 A
5850951 Hayes Dec 1998 A
5851640 Schuhmann et al. Dec 1998 A
5860544 Brucker Jan 1999 A
5862928 Breuer et al. Jan 1999 A
5875909 Guglielmini Mar 1999 A
5882789 Jones et al. Mar 1999 A
5884788 Wilde Mar 1999 A
5902075 Krings May 1999 A
5915577 Levine Jun 1999 A
5925430 Bayer et al. Jul 1999 A
5927530 Moore Jul 1999 A
5929128 Whetten et al. Jul 1999 A
5947311 Gregory Sep 1999 A
5973077 Kan et al. Oct 1999 A
5992661 Zumbuhl et al. Nov 1999 A
5997968 Dries et al. Dec 1999 A
6006930 Dreyer et al. Dec 1999 A
6044994 Miller Apr 2000 A
6056136 Taber et al. May 2000 A
6056141 Navarini et al. May 2000 A
6068933 Shepard et al. May 2000 A
6082566 Yousif et al. Jul 2000 A
6082568 Flanagan Jul 2000 A
6089390 Druitt et al. Jul 2000 A
6105800 Czesak Aug 2000 A
6119422 Clear et al. Sep 2000 A
6119883 Hock et al. Sep 2000 A
6123212 Russell et al. Sep 2000 A
6152316 Niese Nov 2000 A
6152319 Kamachi et al. Nov 2000 A
6158604 Larguia, Sr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6165576 Freedman et al. Dec 2000 A
6179139 Heilman Jan 2001 B1
6202871 Kelly Mar 2001 B1
6206871 Zanon et al. Mar 2001 B1
6220466 Hayes et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231975 Kong et al. May 2001 B1
6234338 Searle May 2001 B1
6235822 Whetten et al. May 2001 B1
6237789 Zhu May 2001 B1
6239210 Kim et al. May 2001 B1
6253939 Wan et al. Jul 2001 B1
6253940 Graham et al. Jul 2001 B1
6257430 Rinnie et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265083 Tanizaki et al. Jul 2001 B1
6276543 German et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277478 Kurita et al. Aug 2001 B1
6302321 Reese et al. Oct 2001 B1
6315140 Nadel Nov 2001 B1
6382443 Gregory May 2002 B1
6382445 McCandless May 2002 B1
6419101 Hessel et al. Jul 2002 B1
6477823 Kitterman et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488165 Hidding Dec 2002 B1
6502710 Bosl et al. Jan 2003 B1
6659297 Gregory et al. Dec 2003 B2
6848590 Brozell et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854614 Sprick Feb 2005 B2
6874647 Bloom et al. Apr 2005 B2
6893672 Ingraham May 2005 B2
6902075 O'Brien et al. Jun 2005 B2
6913157 Oh Jul 2005 B2
6948630 Julian et al. Sep 2005 B2
7004340 Belden, Jr. Feb 2006 B2
7021478 Hock Apr 2006 B1
7168581 Robinson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175039 German et al. Feb 2007 B2
7217454 Smelko et al. May 2007 B2
20010012868 Chen et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020027123 Druitt et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020066713 Ma Jun 2002 A1
20020162818 Williams Nov 2002 A1
20030071007 Ma et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030098285 Gregory et al. May 2003 A1
20030116524 Robinson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030150833 Shenkar Aug 2003 A1
20040055992 Robinson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040173944 Mueller et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050003125 Barber et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050048233 Nomula Mar 2005 A1
20050077297 Marshburn et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050077298 Nomula Apr 2005 A1
20050129969 Schell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050211657 Mallet et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050242097 Morin Nov 2005 A1
20050284837 Taber et al. Dec 2005 A1
20070125785 Robinson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070138125 Granger Jun 2007 A1
20070187352 Kras et al. Aug 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
2572379 Dec 2006 CA
3237634 Apr 1984 DE
4206244 Sep 1993 DE
160978 Nov 1985 EP
207626 Jan 1987 EP
0269920 Jun 1988 EP
275102 Jul 1988 EP
324260 Jul 1989 EP
405365 Jan 1991 EP
0421821 Apr 1991 EP
589033 Mar 1998 EP
2034288 Jun 1980 GB
2130574 Jun 1984 GB
01058675 Mar 1989 JP
01240463 Sep 1989 JP
01308772 Dec 1989 JP
02205574 Aug 1990 JP
02219769 Sep 1990 JP
2000052982 Feb 2000 JP
2001261054 Sep 2001 JP
2006027621 Feb 2006 JP
2006044743 Feb 2006 JP
2006052004 Feb 2006 JP
9009935 Sep 1990 WO
WO-2006002922 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2007042205 Apr 2007 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60602391 Aug 2004 US