Patent Grant
7451630
This invention relates to strategically strengthened steel automotive members of open elongated structure, and is particularly suitable for strategically strengthened, open structure, automobile components, such as impact door beams used for crash energy management.
Automotive vehicles employ crash energy management impact beams for protection of passengers. A good share of these beams are of closed structure type, e.g., cylindrical or tubular, as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,370,437; 5,123,694; 5,118,159; and 4,708,390. Such tubular beams are normally of generally uniform wall thickness. Further, they do not have exposed edges because of their closed or tubular configuration. Therefore, they can be readily induction heat treated. These tubes can be formed of lower hardness steel and then heat treated. Heat treatment of such tubular impact beams can be achieved by induction simply by encircling successive portions of the beam with a heat treatment induction coil to heat the same, followed by quenching. Door beam tubes are sometimes made of special steel, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,210,467, and then cut to length and provided with a desired end configuration.
As an alternative to this type of tubular impact beam structure, it is known to take flat steel, and form it into an open beam by cold stamping or rolling. There is a limit, however, to the hardness and strength of this type of final beam product, because the metal must not be so hard as to not be reliably formable by stamping or rolling. As another alternative, steel may be hot formed into the desired configuration, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,972,134. However, this latter alternative is costly both in the per piece cost and the capital investment required.
Prior efforts to form open section type impact beams from low strength steel, and then heat treat the beam, have resulted in at least two imperfections which are not acceptable. First, if standard induction heating with encircling coils is used, the free or exposed edges of the beam tend to become overheated and burned, while the remainder of the cross section remains insufficiently heated. Second, the impact beam tends to become distorted as a result of the heating and subsequent quenching. Hence, such impact beams do not meet the required quality standards for easy and effective assembly in an automobile, or other vehicle. Furthermore, they do not have the required uniform strength characteristics that are required in many applications due to the uneven heating.
It would therefore be desirable to fabricate automobile components such as impact beams of open structure type from unhardened steel, and subsequently harden selected portions of the steel without the imperfections and drawbacks previously experienced in the prior art. Such an open structure impact beam would preferably have elongated side flanges along its length for added strength, but without the burned flange edges and/or excessively distorted beam structure experienced in the prior art, and with greater and more uniform strength.
One aspect of the present invention is a method of making an automobile component, especially a vehicle impact beam, of the open structure type, and preferably with strengthening flanges, by cold forming it from unhardened steel stock, and then induction heat treating the steel without burning or overheating the flanges, resulting in achieving ultra high tensile strengths of even up to about 238 ksi and yield strengths of about 191 ksi, which is an increase of about 6 percent in the tensile strength and about 15 percent in yield strength over those asserted for hot stamped beams. These are significant differences.
The impact beam is preferably formed of unhardened steel at ambient temperature, with a pair of strengthening side flanges, preferably curled, and a configured central area, preferably of hat-shaped cross-sectional configuration. The preferred hat-shaped area can be of single or multiple hat cross section. The unhardened steel can be readily cold formed by stamping or rolling as examples. The formed workpiece is then hardened in strategically predetermined areas over its length, by proximity coil induction heating while the beam is fixture restrained, the induction process creating eddy currents running the length of the selected areas of the beam rather than transversely of the length, i.e., lengthwise along the crown, the crown sidewalls and/or the flanges.
These and other features, advantages and aspects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims and appended drawings.
FIGS. 7 and 7A-7D show some examples of configurations and strengthening. Specifically:
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper”, “lower”, “right”, “left”, “rear”, “front”, “vertical”, “horizontal” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
Referring now specifically to the drawings, in
Adjacent to but spaced above crown 12 is shown an elongated, proximity induction coil 20 having a lower turn and an upper turn, the lower turn being closely adjacent crown 12 but not in contact therewith, and the turns extending lengthwise of the crown and impact beam 10 over the desired preselected portion of the crown 12 to be strategically strengthened. This arrangement causes induced eddy currents to move in the primarily lengthwise axial direction of the workpiece.
It has been determined that the undesirable burned edge structure in prior art open channel impact beams is a result of the use of encircling induction coils for heat treatment. This is considered to be largely because the induced eddy currents at the surface of the open workpiece transverse to the workpiece axis reversed at the lateral edges of the flanges, creating the undesirable edge overheating. This overheating does not typically occur with enclosed or tubular types of impact beams, because the single direction transverse current flow on the closed section is generally uniform, provided the thickness of the tubular beam is primarily uniform.
In the illustrated example, adjacent and inside the walls 16 of impact beam 10 are shown multiple turns of an elongated proximity induction coil 24, wherein the turns extending lengthwise of the walls for induction heating of sidewalls 16 by currents moving lengthwise in axial direction of the workpiece. Adjacent to and straddling flanges 18 are turns of a lower, outer, elongated, proximity induction coil 28 extending lengthwise of the flanges to cause induction heating by eddy currents moving axially lengthwise of the flanges.
Each of the illustrated induction coils 20, 24 and 28 is connected to a conventional electrical power source (not shown). Also, each is normally hollow for allowing coolant to flow through the coil. The turns of the induction heater elements are normally ceramic coated for electrical protection.
Preferably, conventional flux concentrators are utilized for optimum efficiency of the coils. Specifically, the upper surface of the lower turn of coil 20 has a layer of flux concentrator. Also, an elongated flux concentrator element 30 is positioned centrally of inner coil 24. Finally, the outer surfaces of coil 28 adjacent flanges 18 can have a layer of flux concentrator.
Coil 24 extends over the length of those portions of walls 16 which are to be strategically strengthened. Coil 28 extends over the length of those portions of the flanges 18 which are to be strategically strengthened. Since the impact beam 10 has a configuration which slopes toward the ends, such as in
The beam blank or workpiece is initially forcefully cold formed at substantially ambient temperature from non-hardened steel, such as by stamping and/or rolling techniques of conventional type, into the desired configuration. A suitable material for the workpiece is a hardenable steel, i.e., quenchable steel. The two axial ends 11 can be formed into the flattened paddle shape shown in
In the illustrated example, prior to the heat treatment, the cold formed beam workpiece is shown fixtured in a suitable clamping device, preferably by having both ends clamped securely in a fixture, as shown in
Once the impact beam workpiece is fixtured, electrical power is supplied to the elongated coil or coils extending along the workpiece. The drawings show three coils, but these may alternatively be multiple turns of one coil, two coils or some other number of coils. As here shown, upper coil 20, central coil 24 and/or lower outer coil 28 cause eddy currents to be created lengthwise of the adjacent impact beam portions, and thereby significantly increase the temperature of the impact beam portions to a desired predetermined value and for a desired predetermined time to obtain appropriate metallurgical changes. Experimentation showed that use of a pulser to selectively interrupt activation of the coils creates pulse heating with lapsed time after pulses for conduction disperses the heat uniformly, which is advantageous in achieving uniform heat throughout the selected cross section. Typical pulse/conduction heating is a 100 Kw, 30 Hz induction pulse of about five seconds at 50 percent power, followed by a one second lapse for conductance, repeated as necessary until the target section is sufficiently heated. These power and time factors will vary with the specific item being treated. Preferably the length of all three portions of the hat-shaped beam, i.e., crown 12, walls 16 and flanges 18, is heated lengthwise thereof by eddy currents moving lengthwise of the beam. When the appropriate preselected temperature is reached for the time necessary, the coils are deactivated, a pair of quench tank units 50a and 50b of a quench subassembly 50 is moved adjacent to and astraddle of the door beam, and coolant is then rapidly and suddenly applied through nozzles 50a′ and 50b′ directed onto the impact beam 10 to quench the same while it is still fixtured or retained in fixture 40, and thereby reduce the temperature of impact beam 10 to create the desired hardening effect. If the induction coils interfere with the quenching apparatus, the coils may be moved before the quenching step.
The resulting impact beams 10 have significantly increased tensile and yield strengths compared to the known prior art hot stamped beams. This enables a lighter weight beam to be employed, thereby reducing manufacturing costs and improving vehicle efficiency. It has been found that by utilizing the concept and method herein, ultra high strengths of even about 238 ksi tensile strength and about 191 ksi yield strength can be achieved in the strategically strengthened portions of the open structure impact beam. These are substantially above the 226 ksi tensile strength and 167 ksi yield strength of the prior art hot stamped products. This is highly desirable.
FIGS. 7 and 7A-7D illustrate several possible single crown impact beams strengthened in selected zones as noted previously. The single crown configuration of each can be of multiple crown configuration.
The above description is considered that of the preferred embodiments only. Modifications of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art and to those who make or use the invention. Therefore, it is understood that the embodiments shown in the drawings and described above are merely for illustrative purposes and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the following claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1433161 | Smith et al. | Oct 1922 | A |
| 1526894 | Bellis | Feb 1925 | A |
| 1594322 | O'Donovan | Jul 1926 | A |
| 1843200 | Brannon | Feb 1932 | A |
| 2003094 | Shimer et al. | May 1935 | A |
| 2170130 | Denneen et al. | Aug 1939 | A |
| 2170876 | Shorter | Aug 1939 | A |
| 2196902 | Jones | Apr 1940 | A |
| 2202759 | Denneen et al. | May 1940 | A |
| 2243174 | Stevenson | May 1941 | A |
| 2303408 | Soderholm | Dec 1942 | A |
| 2419619 | Wood | Apr 1947 | A |
| 2576342 | Hess et al. | Nov 1951 | A |
| 2683031 | Grönegress | Jul 1954 | A |
| 2831788 | Bridge et al. | Apr 1958 | A |
| 3169893 | Wuerfel | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3352724 | McNitt et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3460815 | Corteggiano et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3556499 | Hammon | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3905630 | Cantrell et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3927870 | Seulen et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3972744 | Cantrell et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4010969 | Cantrell et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4043847 | Just | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4062701 | Juhas | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4093839 | Moliterno et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4142923 | Satava | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4210467 | Klatzer et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4305272 | Johnson | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4323404 | Sawada et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4468010 | Novorsky | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4486249 | Woodings | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4561908 | Berchem | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4708390 | Palentyn et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4732624 | Balzer | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4740255 | Manton | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4796946 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4880477 | Hayes et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4919473 | Laimighofer et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4959107 | Wallick, Jr. et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5118159 | Horling et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5123694 | DePierre et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5180204 | Shirasawa et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5181974 | Tanabe et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5192376 | Tanabe et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5232261 | Kuroda et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5256217 | Macheske | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5370437 | Alberda | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5451276 | Junius | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5473960 | Sakamoto et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5487795 | Kim et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5495094 | Rowan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5570558 | Persson | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5600931 | Jonsson | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5672216 | Robic | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5739506 | Hanton et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5755486 | Wycech | May 1998 | A |
| 5756167 | Tamura et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5785376 | Nees et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5813718 | Masuda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813719 | Kowalski | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5829716 | Kirkwood et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5868456 | Kowalski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5887938 | Töpker et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5972134 | Buschsieweke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6227609 | Mellis | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6322645 | Dykstra et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4280924 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 4263007 | Sep 1992 | JP |
| 5148531 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| 610302 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050081479 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
