Heater cable in combination with a lead cable

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6388237
  • Patent Number
    6,388,237
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 19, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 14, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A heater cable is wired in combination with a lead cable, the two cables form a pattern wherein the heater cable and the lead cable are spaced by a predetermined distance L, in the range of 0 to 10 mm, from each other and are supplied with opposite flow of current. The heater cable has a core thread, a heating element wire wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the core thread, a fusing layer provided over the heating element wire, a signal wire wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer and a protective coating provided over the signal wire. The lead cable has a conductive wire covered at its outer surface with an insulating coating.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a heater cable in combination with a lead cable. More particularly, the invention relates to a wiring pattern which is capable of minimizing the generation of leak magnetic field from the heater cable.




2. Description of the Prior Art




A conventional sheet-like heating appliance such as an electric blanket or an electric carpet is fabricated by wiring a heater cable


40


and a sensor cable


50


in a combination in a carpet fabric material; for example, the heater cable


40


comprising, as shown in

FIG. 15

, a heating element wire


32


wound in a spiral at intervals of a given distance on the outer surface of a polyester core thread


31


, a fusing layer


33


of nylon or polyester provided over the heating element wire


32


, a short-circuit wire


34


wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer


33


, and a protective coating


35


of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) provided over the short-circuit wire


34


, and the sensor cable


50


comprising, as shown in

FIG. 16

, a signal wire


42


wound in a spiral on the outer surface of a polyester core thread


41


, a fusing layer


43


provided over the signal wire


42


, another signal wire


44


wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer


43


, and a protective coating


45


provided over the signal wire


44


.




In such a conventional sheet-like heating appliance when turned on, the heating element wire


32


of the heater cable


40


only is supplied with a flow of current.




The fusing layer


33


and


43


have a so-called fusing function (fuse action) that when the heater cable


40


is overheated with a sensor wire


50


on the sheet-like heating body malfunctioning and its temperature locally rises up close to the melting point of a resin material of the fusing layer


33


and


43


(referred to as a fusing layer material hereinafter), the fusing layer material is softened or fused to short-circuit between the heating element wire


32


and the short-circuit wire


34


, and the signal wires


42


and


44


, and to disconnect the power supply. More particularly, the fusing layer


33


and


43


are designed to act as finally a safety circuit for protecting the sheet-like heating body from being overheated.




The polyamide resin, such as nylon-12, which is used in the fusing layer


33


and


43


have acceptable levels of molding formability, mechanical properties, and thermal properties required for the fusing layer material.




When the heater cable


40


of the conventional appliance arranged in a known pattern is energized, the current which flows in the heater cable


40


may generate a leak magnetic field. Consequently, high frequencies of the leak magnetic field develop a magnetic noise which gives adverse effects over the other electric appliances. It is now said that low frequencies may also affect the human body. Therefore, those problems are particularly emphasized in the conventional sheet-like heating appliances, namely electric blankets and carpets, for warming the human body.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention has been schemed for solving the above problems of the prior art and its object is to provide a wiring pattern which is capable of diminishing the leak magnetic field from the heater cable, as preferably applicable to a sheet-like heating appliance such an electric blanket or an electric carpet.




As a first feature of the present invention, a heater cable in combination with a lead cable, in which the heater cable comprising a heating element wire wound in a spiral on the outer surface of a core thread, a fusing layer coated over the heating element wire, a signal wire wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer and a protective coating provided over the signal wire, the lead cable comprising a conductive wire covered at its outer surface with an insulating coating, and the heater cable and the lead cable are formed such a pattern that the heater cable and the lead cable are spaced by a predetermined distance L from each other and are capable to be supplied with opposite flows of current is provided.




In the heater cable in combination with the lead cable according to the first feature of the present invention, the two opposite flows of current introduced into the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


respectively permit their induced intensities of magnetic field to be offset by each other, hence diminishing the leak magnetic field.




As a second feature of the present invention is a heater cable in combination with a lead cable, wherein the distance L is not greater than 10 mm.




In the heater cable in combination with the lead cable according to the second feature of the present invention, the distance L between the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


which are uniformly spaced from each other in the wiring pattern is set not greater than 10 mm, thus effectively diminishing the leak magnetic field. It is desired that the above mentioned fusing layer comprises copolymer polyester resin which has the following characteristics (a) and/or (b) and (c) to (f).




(a) The angle α between the baseline and a tangent to the heat absorption peak of a Differential Scanning Colorimetry (DSC) curve defined by a Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) K7121 (ISO 3146) method is 90° to 120°.




(b) The angle α′ between the baseline and a tangent to the shift portion of a ThermoMechanical Analysis (TMA) curve determined in an expansion mode by a thermal-mechanical measuring method is 90° to 100°.




(c) The melting point is 160° C. to 210° C.




(d) The reduction viscosity is not lower than 0.5 dl/g.




(e) The moisture absorption is not higher than 1.0% at a temperature of 20° C. and a relative moisture rate of 65%.




(f) The hardness measured by a JIS K7215 (ISO 868) method is Hardness Degree (HDD) 40 to 74.




Also, it is desired that the anti-heat deterioration of the resin of the fusing layer stand for 500 hours at a temperature of 140° C.




The composition of the above mentioned copolymer polyester resin is now explained in more detail. One of its acid components is aromatic dicarboxylic acid which may be selected from terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, 2-6-naphthalenedicaboxylic acid, biphenyldicarboxylic acid, so on and their ester. Similarly, its aliphatic dicarboxylic acid component having 2 to 20 carbon atoms may be selected from succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, dodecanedionic acid, dimer acid, so on and their ester. Its alicyclic dicarboxylic acid component may be selected from 1.4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, so on and its ester. Its hydroxy-carboxylic acid component may be selected form p-hydroxy-aromatic acid, so on and its ester.




Its glycol component is aliphatic glycol which may be selected from 1,4-butanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,2-butanediol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,5-pentadiol, 3-metyl-1,5-pentadiol, 1,9-nonanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, doracanedionic acid, neopentyl glycol, neopentyl glycol hydroxy pivalate, 2-ethyl-2-butylpropanediol, and bisphenol-A-ethylene-oxide or -propylene-oxide derivative, so on.




Other copolymer components than the above mentioned are glycol such as polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polytetramethylene glycol, so on, ε-caprolactone, hyroxycapronic acid, polycaprolactone, and tricyclodecanedimethylol, so on.




The above materials may arbitrarily be combined in a desired combination or ratio without departing from the characteristics (a) to (f) defined above to produce a type of the copolymer polyester resin according to the present invention. The copolymer polyester resin of the present invention may be added, if desired, with anti-oxidation agents, stabilizers, anti-copper agents, non-organic fillers, nucleating agents, surface activators, anti-static agents, flame-retardants, plasticizers, and thickening agents, so on.




Thermoplastic resins are generally classified into crystalline polymer and non-crystalline polymer depending on their molecular structures. Such polymers have a wide range of melting points in a given temperature range based on the motion of a main chain of the polymers and show no sharp phase shift compared with non-organic compounds and metallic substances, thus determining no definite melting points. This allows the resin material of the fusing layer in a heater cable to commonly employ polyamide resins (nylon-11 and nylon-12) which have comparatively definite melting points. Polyamide resins are however less favorable in the moisture absorption than the other resins. We, the inventors, had been engaged to focus on copolymer polyester resins to develop a novel material which is not related to the disadvantages of polyamide resins. After closely examining the resin composition and the behavior of softening and melting, we invented a novel copolymer polyester resin featuring particular relationship between the DSC and TMA characteristics and the fusing characteristic essential for a heater cable. The action of the characteristics (a) to (f) of the present invention will now be described in detail.




Having the characteristic (a) that the angle α between the baseline and a tangent to the heat absorption peak of a DSC curve is 90° to 120° (preferably, 90° to 110° ), the fusing layer provides a sharp thermal fusing function. However, when the angle a exceeds 120°, a range of the softening fluidity of the resin will be increased hence declining the thermal fusing function.




Having the characteristic (b) that the angle α′ between the baseline and a tangent to the shift portion of a TMA curve is 90° to 100° (preferably, 90° to 95°), the fusing layer provides as a sharp thermal fusing function as of the characteristic (a). However, when the angle α′ exceeds 100°, a range of the softening fluidity of the resin will be increased hence declining the thermal fusing function. This may cause actual measurements of the fusing temperature to vary more or less.




Also, as the thermal behavior is governed by the characteristics (a) and (b), the melting point is practically limited to a definite range (160 to 210° C.). This allows the fusing temperature to be arbitrarily changed within the range. Accordingly, the selection of the fusing temperature can be made from a wider range than that of polyamide resin, hence permitting the fabrication of more practically useful heater cable.




As specified by the character (c), the copolymer polyester resin has a melting point ranging from 160° C. to 210° C. (preferably, from 170° C. to 200° C.) and can thus be used favorably as the material of the fusing layer. If the melting point is set to lower than 160° C, the heater cable may often be heated close to 160° C. locally depending on its using condition and the temperature will rise easily to its limit level of overheat protection determined by the design criterion. This discourages the reliability of the heater cable as the commercial product. When the melting point is set to higher than 210° C., the fusing temperature of the fusing layer becomes too high, i.e. the surface temperature of the product is too high, and will hardly satisfy applicable safe standards.




As specified by the characteristic (d), the copolymer polyester resin has a reduction viscosity of not lower than 0.5dl/g (preferably, not lower than 0.7dl/g) and can favorably be used as the material of the fusing layer. If the reduction viscosity is set to lower than 0. 5dl/g, the delivery of the resin during the tubing extrusion will be unstable thus failing to form a uniform thickness of the fusing layer. This causes the heater cable to have poor mechanical properties, for example, less in the strength and the extensibility, thus shortening the operating life.




As specified by the characteristic (e), the copolymer polyester resin has a moisture absorption of not higher than 1.0% (preferably, not higher than 0.8%) at a temperature of 20° C. and a relative moisture rate of 65% and can favorably be used as the material of the fusing layer. If the moisture absorption exceeds 1.0%, the resin may easily be affected by an ambient condition (moisture).




The moisture absorption of nylon-11 and nylon-12 which are commonly used is substantially 1.3% (cited from “Chemical Fiber II”, p. 406, by Hiroshi Matsuzaki and Kenji Oshina, Maruzen Publishing in Japan) at a temperature of 20° C. and a relative moisture rate of 65%, which is much higher than 1.0%. In fact, such nylon-11 and nylon-12 are still employed with their disadvantage on the moisture absorption being compensated since no appropriate materials for the fusing layer are so far provided which can replace the nylon-11 and nylon-12.




A polyester resin comprising terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol is known which has a small level of water (moisture) absorption and is good in electric characteristics. This resin is favorable in mass production and overwhelmingly accepted as one of the most common-use resins. This is now used as a cable core for a heating conductor in a heater cable but not as the material as the fusing layer. One of the reasons is that the melting point of the resin is as high as 256 to 265° C. (cited from “Synthetic Polymer V” by Shunsuke Murahashi) and not favorable for use as a thermal fuse in view of the safety requirements.




As specified by the characteristic (f), the copolymer polyester resin has a hardness of HDD 40 to 74 (preferably, HDD 50 to 70) and can favorably used as the material of the fusing layer. If the hardness is smaller than HDD 40, the fusing layer will be too soft when extrusion processed. This causes the short-circuit signal line to be sunk down into the fusing layer when wound over, whereby the fusing temperature will vary more or less. If the hardness exceeds HDD 74, the fusing layer will be too hard when extrusion processed. This causes the heater cable to be declined in the flexibility, hence making wiring works difficult in the production of electric blankets or carpets.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic view showing a structure of a heater cable employed in a wiring pattern according to the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic view showing a structure of a lead cable employed in the wiring pattern according to the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a schematic view of an example of the wiring pattern according to the present invention, accompanied at its right a partially enlarged view;





FIG. 4

is a schematic view showing a leak magnetic field detecting method of measuring a leak magnetic field on the heater cable;





FIG. 5

is a graphic diagram showing resultant measurements of the leak magnetic field on the heater cable.





FIG. 6

is a schematic view showing a fusing detecting circuit of the heater cable;





FIG. 7

is a chart showing a DCS curve of copolymer polyester resin (A);





FIG. 8

is a chart showing a DCS curve of copolymer polyester resin (B);





FIG. 9

is a chart showing a DCS chart of nylon-12;





FIG. 10

is a chart showing a TMA curve of the copolymer polyester resin (A);





FIG. 11

is a chart showing a TMA curve of the copolymer polyester resin (B);





FIG. 12

is a chart showing a TMA chart of the nylon-12;





FIG. 13

is a diagram of a DCS curve model;





FIG. 14

is a diagram of a TMA curve model;





FIG. 15

is a schematic view showing a structure of a conventional heater cable; and





FIG. 16

is a schematic view showing a structure of a conventional signal wire.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The present invention will be described in more details in the form of preferred embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is understood that the present invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiments.




1. First Embodiment





FIG. 1

is a schematic view showing a structure of a heater cable employed in the wiring pattern of the present invention.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, the heater cable


10


has a structure comprising a core thread


1


, a heating element wire


2


wound in a spiral at intervals of a given distance on the outer surface of the core thread


1


, a fusing layer


3


provided over the heating element wire


2


, a signal wire


4


wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer


3


, and a protective coating


5


provided over the signal wire


4


.




The core thread


1


may be polyester fabric. The heating element wire


2


may be flat square copper, flat square copper alloy, round copper, or round copper alloy wire. The fusing layer


3


may be made of nylon or polyester. The signal wire


4


may be flat square copper, flat square copper alloy, round copper, or round copper alloy wire. The protective coating


5


may be made of PVC.





FIG. 2

is a schematic view showing a structure of a lead cable employed in the wiring pattern of the present invention.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, the lead cable


20


has a structure comprising a conductive wire


11


coated at its outer surface with an insulating coating


12


. The conductive wire


11


may be selected from a single wire of copper, copper alloy, or their plated, a strand of copper, copper alloy, or their plated wires, and a twisted cable of copper, copper alloy, or their plated wires twisted at proper pitches. The insulating coating


12


may be made of PVC.





FIG. 3

is a schematic view showing an example of the heater cable in combination with a lead cable of the present invention, accompanied with a partially enlarged view at the right.




As shown in

FIG. 3

, the wiring pattern according to the present invention allows the heater cable


10


illustrated in

FIG. 1

to extend along with the lead cable


20


illustrated in

FIG. 2

, hence constituting a wiring pattern


100


where opposite flows of current are introduced to the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


to minimize the generation of leak magnetic field. Also, the distance L between the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


in the wiring pattern


100


is set to a constant value not greater than 10 mm in order to effectively diminish the intensity of the leak magnetic field.




As a result, the wiring pattern


100


according to the present invention can favorably be used as a sheet-like heating appliance such as an electric blanket or an electric carpet. If the distance L between the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


is greater than 10 mm, the intensity of the leak magnetic field will hardly be diminished.




2. Measurement for the leak magnetic field on the heater cable.




The measurement for the leak magnetic field on the heater cable in the wiring pattern when it is energized will now be explained referring to FIG.


3


and FIG.


4


.

FIG. 4

is a schematic view showing a leak magnetic field measuring method of measuring the leak magnetic field on the heater cable.




In the leak magnetic field measuring method on the wiring pattern


100


according to the present invention, as shown in

FIG. 3

, while the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


are connected to a controller c and energized from an AC power source d to flow two opposite currents


11


and


12


respectively denoted by the arrow marks, the leak magnetic field on the heater cable


10


is measured with the detecting head k of a magnetic field detector z illustrated in FIG.


4


.




Table 1, shown below, lists the resultant measurements of the leak magnetic field with different rates of the current introduced to the wiring pattern


100


of the first embodiment when the distance L between the heater cable


10


and the lead cable


20


is varied in three steps, 0 mm, 10 mm and 20 mm. The measurements are also plotted in FIG.


5


.




Table 2 illustrates a comparison where the heater cable


40


in the conventional pattern (as expressed a “single heater cable” in Table 2 and

FIG. 5

) is energized with different rates of the current and measured by the same method for detecting the leak magnetic field. The resultant measurements are shown in FIG.


5


.




For the measurement, the frequency of the AC power source d was 60 Hz. A single detector complying with the MPR-II standard for VDU (visual display unit) testing (more specifically, “Combinova” MFM10, a product of Toyotechnica in Japan) was used as the magnetic field detector z.













TABLE 1











Distance between







Heater cable and




Leak magnetic field/μT














Lead cable




0 mm




10 mm




20 mm


















Current (A)




0.0




0.006




0.006




0.006







0.5




0.202








1.0




0.179




0.221




0.413







1.5




0.166








2.0




0.392























TABLE 1











Distance between







Heater cable and




Leak magnetic field/μT














Lead cable




0 mm




10 mm




20 mm


















Current (A)




0.0




0.006




0.006




0.006







0.5




0.202








1.0




0.179




0.221




0.413







1.5




0.166








2.0




0.392














It is apparent from Table 1 and Table 2 and

FIG. 5

that the intensity of the leak magnetic field on the heater cable


10


in the wiring pattern


100


of the first embodiment is varied depending on the rates of current supplied and its level is significantly smaller than that with the single heater cable of the conventional pattern. Also, it is proved that the leak magnetic field can substantially be diminished when the distance L between the heater cable and the lead cable, which are spaced from each other and not closely contacted to, is not greater than 10 mm.




The wiring pattern according to the present invention permits the heater cable to be wired along with the lead cable while the flows of current supplied to the heater cable and the lead cable are introduced in opposite directions. Consequently, the wiring pattern of the present invention can effectively diminish the leak magnetic field.




As set forth above, the wiring pattern cables according to the present invention when particularly used as a sheet-like heating appliance such as an electric blanket or an electric carpet will contribute to the diminishing of the leak magnetic field, which affects the human body, in an electronic apparatus or the like. Accordingly, the present invention is advantageous for use in various industrial fields.




3. Second Embodiment




The mode of embodiment of the wiring pattern of the present invention having copolymer polyester resin as its fusing layer will be described. Note that parts termed in the examples represents weight parts.




EXPERIMENT 1: Production of copolymer polyester resin (A) for fusing layer.




856 parts of dimethyl terephthalate of acid base and 897 parts of 1,4-butanediol of glycol base were supplied together with 0.37 part of tetra-n-butyl titanate used as a catalyst into a container which is equipped with a mixer, a thermometer, and a distillation condenser and subjected to esterification reaction at a temperature of 160 to 210° C. for 4 hours. Then, 216 parts of ε-caprolactone of glycol base and 1.08 parts of Irganox (a product of Ciba-Geigy) used as a stabilizer were added and mixed at 220° C. for 30 minutes to one hour to stimulate a further reaction. After the pressure was reduced to 5 mmHg throughout a duration of 40 minutes while the reaction temperature being increased to 255° C., a polycondensation process was finally carried out under a vacuum condition of less than 0.3 mmHg for one hour. As the result, a white product of copolymer polyester resin (A) for fusing layer was obtained. Its components analyzed by NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) are shown in Table 3 below.




EXPERIMENT 2: Production of copolymer polyester resin (B) for fusing layer.




823 parts of dimethyl terephthalate, 961 parts of 1,4-butanediol, and 0.40 part of tetra-n-butyl titanate were supplied into a container similar to that of Example 1 and subjected to esterification reaction for a temperature of 160 to 210° C. for 4 hours. Then, 312 parts of dodecandione acid and 1.1 parts of Irganox were added and mixed at 160 to 210° C. for one hour and 20 minutes to stimulate the esterification reaction. After the pressure was reduced to 5 mmHg throughout a duration of 40 minutes while the reaction temperature being increased to 255° C., a polycondensation process was finally carried out under a vacuum condition of less than 0.3 mmHg for 50 minutes. As the result, a white product of copolymer polyester resin (B) for fusing layer was obtained. Its components analyzed by NMR are also shown in Table 3 below.












TABLE 3











Compositions analyzed by NMR














Fusing layer








material




Composition (mol %)




















EX-




1




copolymer




Terephthalic




ε -




1,4-butane-






PERI-





polyester




acid (43)




caprolactone




diol (44)






MENT





resin (A)





(13)







2




copolymer




Terephthalic




dodecandione




1,4-butane-








polyester




acid (74)




acid (26)




diol (100)








resin (B)














COMPARISON 1




The resin for fusing layer was nylon-12.




MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CHARACTERISTIC VALUES




Methods of measuring and evaluating various characteristic values of the copolymer polyester resins (A) and (B) produced by EXPERIMENT 1 and EXPERIMENT 2 and the resin (nylon-12) of COMPARISON 1 will be explained in more detail.




(a) Angle α between the baseline and a tangent to the heat absorption peak of a DSC curve determined by JIS K7121




The DSC curve is plotted from measurements of the copolymer polyester resins (A) and (B) and nylon-12 which were recorded by a JIS K7121 (Measurement for transition temperature of plastic materials) oriented manner using thermal analysis measuring devices (H-5200 and DSC-220C of Seiko Electronics). The measurement was carried out with a test piece of 3.5 mg precisely weighed under the conditions including 10° C./min of temperature rising speed, −50° C. to 250° C. of measuring temperature range, 1 time/second of data retrieval, the atmospheric level of pressure, and the presence of air. As the DSC curves of the measurements are illustrated in

FIG. 7

,

FIG. 8

, and

FIG. 9

, the temperature is read in 7.6 mm/10° C. along the x axis and the calorie in 6.0 mm/100 μw along the y axis.




The calculation of the angle α is explained referring to the DSC curve of FIG.


13


. As shown in

FIG. 13

, the DSC curve is based on the differential scanning calorie metering and plotted in a graph defined by the y axis representing a difference ΔT (DSC μw) between two thermal energy inputs per unit time which were applied to the test piece and a reference substance so that their temperatures are identical to each other and the x axis representing the temperature. The baselines B


1


and B


2


are portions of the DSC curve illustrating a temperature range where no transition and reaction are detected on the test piece. The heat absorption peak P is a portion of the DSC curve between the baseline B


1


and B


2


. Denoted by S is a tangent to the left leg of the heat absorption peak P. The angle α is given between the tangent S and the baseline B


1


. Measurements of the angle α shown in

FIG. 7

,

FIG. 8

, and

FIG. 9

are listed in Table 4.












TABLE 4











Angle α between the baseline and a tangent to the






heat absorption peak














Fusing layer material




degree (°) of α




















EXPERI-




1




Copolymer polyester




108







MENT





resin (A)








2




Copolymer polyester




110









resin (B)















COMPARISON 1




Nylon-12




95















(b) Angle α′ between the baseline and a tangent to the shift of a TMA curve measured in an expansion mode by thermal-mechanical measurement.




The TMA curve is plotted from measurements of the copolymer polyester resins (A) and (B) and nylon-12 which were recorded by a TMA expansion mode manner using thermal analyzing devices (H-5200 and TMA/SS-150C of Seiko Electronics). Each test piece used was sized to a 5×5 mm square with a thickness of 1 mm, held between two silica disks (10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness), and measured under the conditions including 5° C./min of temperature rising speed, 0° C. to 250° C. of measuring temperature range, 1 time/second of sampling, the atmospheric level of pressure, and the presence of air. The resultant measurements are expressed in a TMA curve where the temperature is read in 6.3 mm/10° C. along the x axis and the shift in 15 mm/100 μm along the y axis. The TMA curves are shown in

FIG. 10

,

FIG. 11

, and FIG.


12


.




The calculation of the angle α′ is explained referring to a TMA curve model of FIG.


14


. The model illustrate TMA μm along the y axis and the temperature along the x axis. The baseline B


1


and B


2


are portions of the TMA curve illustrating a range of temperature where no transition and reaction are detected on the test pieces. The shift curve H is a portion of the TMA curve between the baselines B


1


and B


2


. Denoted by S is a tangent to the shift curve H. The angle α′ is defined between the tangent S and the baseline B


1


. Measurements of the angle α′ from

FIG. 10

,

FIG. 11

, and

FIG. 12

are shown below in Table 5.












TABLE 5











Angle α′ between the baseline and a tangent to the






shift curve














Fusing layer material




degree (°) of α′




















EXPERI-




1




Copolymer polyester




91







MENT





Resin (A)








2




Copolymer polyester




94









Resin (B)















COMPARISON 1




Nylon-12




93















(c) Melting point of copolymer polyester resins (A) and (B) and nylon-12.




The measurement of the melting point was carried out by a JIS K7121 based manner (Measurement for transition temperature of plastic materials) where a temperature (Tpm) on the DSC curve was recorded as the melting point using thermal analysis measuring devices (H-5200 and DSC-220C of Seiko Electronics). Measurements of the melting points are shown below in Table 6.












TABLE 6











Melting point















Melting







Fusing layer material




point (° C.)




















EXPERI-




1




Copolymer polyester




187.1







MENT





Resin (A)








2




Copolymer polyester




183.0









Resin (B)















COMPARISON 1




Nylon-12




179.0















(d) Measurement of reduction viscosity




The measurement of reduction viscosity (dl/g) was carried out in which 0.1 g of a test piece was sampled from each of the resins which had completely been dried out, dissolved in 25 ml of a mixture solvent containing phenol/tetrachloroethane (6/4 of weight ratio), and measured at 30° C. using a viscometer. Measurements of the reduction viscosity are shown below in Table 7.












TABLE 7











Reduction viscosity















Reduction







Fusing layer material




viscosity (dl/g)




















EXPERI-




1




Copolymer polyester




0.89







MENT





Resin (A)








2




Copolymer polyester




0.92









Resin (B)















COMPARISON 1




Nylon-12




*(1.80 ± 0.05)













Note*: complied to DIN 53727













(e) Measurement of moisture absorption




The measurement of moisture absorption started with a test piece of 15 cm long, 4 cm wide, and 100 μm thickness being fabricated from each of the resins and completely dried out in a vacuum dryer. The test piece was then placed in an airtightly sealed lid-openable weighting bottle and weighed using a chemical balance. The measurement of weight was expressed by Ws. Then, the lid of the bottle was removed and the bottle was set in a normal-temperature, normal-moisture vessel where the temperature was 20±2° C. and the relative moisture was 65±2 %. After 72 hours or more, the lid was returned back on the bottle. The weighting bottle was taken out from the vessel and weighed again. The measurement of weight then was expressed by Wm. Note that the bottle itself weighs Wo. The moisture absorption (%) was calculated from the following formula 1. Results of the moisture absorption are shown below in Table 8.






Moisture absorption (%)=(Wm−Ws)/(Ws−Wo)×100  Formula 1














TABLE 8











Moisture absorption















Moisture







Fusing layer material




Absorption (%)




















EXPERI-




1




Copolymer polyester




0.78







MENT





Resin (A)








2




Copolymer polyester




0.71









Resin (B)















COMPARISON 1




Nylon-12




1.36















(f) Measurement of hardness




The measurement of hardness was carried out by a JIS K7215 (Durometer hardness test for plastic materials) based manner. Test pieces were uniformly shaped to a30-mm square with a thickness of 5 mm by heat pressing and measured using a hardness meter made by Instrument & Mfg. Co. Inc. Measurements of the hardness are shown below in Table 9.












TABLE 9











Hardness














Fusing layer material




Hardness (HDD)




















EXPERI-




1




Copolymer polyester




71







MENT





Resin (A)








2




Copolymer polyester




62









Resin (B)















COMPARISON 1




Nylon-12




76















REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTIC TEST RESULT




As apparent from the test results on the characteristics (a) to (f) shown in Table 4 to Table 9, the copolymer polyester resins (A) and (B) of EXPERIMENT 1 and EXPERIMENT 2 satisfy the requirements of the characteristics (a) to (f).




On contrary, nylon-12 of Comparison 1 provides a higher percentage of the moisture absorption and a higher level of the hardness.




FABRICATION OF HEATER CABLE




EXPERIMENT 3: Fabrication of a heater cable (A) having the fusing function.




The fabrication of a heater cable (A) having the fusing function is now explained referring to FIG.


1


. Three 0.14-mm-diameter copper wires were wound in a spiral on the outer surface of a core 1, which was a polyester thread of 1500D and 120 T/m having a diameter of 0.45 mm, to form a heating conductor


2


. A fusing layer


3


of 0.445 mm thick was provided over the heating conductor


2


by a tubing extruder (40 mm, L/D=25), not shown, extruding the copolymer polyester resin (A) into a tubular shape under the conditions; 180° C. (at the entrance), 190° C. (at a midway), and 190° C. (at the exit) of cylinder temperature, 200° C. of dice head temperature, 15 to 20% of drawdown, and 280 m/min of extrusion linear speed. Then, three 0.13 mm-diameter copper wires were wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer


3


to form a short-circuit signal line


4


. A protective coating


5


was provided over the short-circuit signal line


4


by extruding a dose of PVC so that the outer diameter was 2.35 mm, hence completing the heater cable


10


with the fusing function. The heater cable


10


was designed for a rating of 100 V-350 W.




EXPERIMENT 4: Fabrication of a heater cable (B) having the fusing function.




A heater cable (B) was fabricated by the same manner as of EXPERIMENT 3, except that the fusing layer


3


was made of the copolymer polyester resin (B).




COMPARISON 2




A heater cable (C) was fabricated by the same manner as of EXAMPLE 3, except that the fusing layer


3


was made of nylon-12.




CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR HEATER CABLE




1. Fusing Test




The heater cables (A), (B), and (C) of EXAMPLE 3 and EXAMPLE 4 and COMPARISON 2 were cut to substantially 2 m lengths and each length was separated into five segments. After treated at both ends, test pieces of 25 cm long were prepared. The test pieces were loaded into a normal-temperature vessel, impressed between their heating conductors and short-circuit lines by a voltage of 100 V, and heated up at a rate of 1° C./min. The temperature when the heating conductor and the short-circuit signal line were short-circuited was detected and recorded as a fusing temperature. A circuit used for the fusing test is illustrated in FIG.


6


. Resultant measurements of the test are listed below in Table 10.












TABLE 10











Fusing temperature of heater cable (n = 5)














Heater cables




Fusing temperature (° C.)


















EXPERI-




3




Heater cable (A)




162 163 163 164 163 (X = 163.0° C.)






MENT




4




Heater cable (B)




164 165 165 165 165 (X = 164.8° C.)













COMPARI-




Heater cable (C)




164 162 162 162 162 (X = 162.4° C.)






SON 2














2. Anti-heat deterioration test (Self-radial winding estimation test)




For examining the operating life of the heater cables (A), (B), and (C) of EXAMPLE 3 and EXAMPLE 4 and COMPARISON 2 in view of thermal deterioration, an anti-heat deterioration test was carried out. Three test pieces having a length of 30 cm were cut out from each of the heater cables and placed in a normal-temperature vessel set to 140° C. for thermal deterioration. For evaluation of the anti-heat deterioration, the test pieces were taken out from the normal-temperature vessel at equal intervals of a specific time, peeled off their PVC protective coatings, and closely wound ten times on round bars of which the diameter was two times greater than that of the heater cables while being tensioned by a load (350 g) to find whether or not any sign of crack occurred in their fusing layers. Upon finding a crack, the anti-heat deterioration test for (the fusing layer material of) the heater cable was terminated. A no-good result was given when any of a set of the three test pieces of each heater cable generated a sign of crack. Results of the test are shown below in Table 11.












TABLE 11











Anti-heat deterioration characteristics of






heater cable (n = 3)














EXAMPLE




COMPARISON















3




4




2


















Heater cable




Heater




Heater




Heater







cable (A)




cable (B)




cable (C)






Resin for




Copolymer




Copolymer




Nylon-12






Fusing layer




polyester




polyester







resin (A)




resin (B)





















Heat




7 days (168 hrs)



















































up




10 days (240 hrs)



















































Time




11 days (264 hrs)




















































12 days (288 hrs)




















































13 days (312 hrs)












































×







14 days (336 hrs)







































×




×







15 days (360 hrs)


































×




×




×







17 days (408 hrs)


































×




×




×







19 days (456 hrs)


































×




×




×







21 days (504 hrs)















































◯ : no crack. ×: crack found.













As apparent from Table 10, the fusing temperatures of the heater cables (A) and (B) according to the present invention are substantially equal to that of nylon-12. Also, it is clear from the result of the anti-heat deterioration test shown in Table 11, (the fusing layer materials of) the heater cables (A) and (B) exhibit no sign of crack after 504 hours of the heating time at 140° C. which exceeds 336 hours. On contrary, the anti-heat deterioration of the heater cable (C) of COMPARISON 2 is as low as 288 hours. Accordingly, the heater cables of the present invention have the operating life about 1.7 times greater than that of the conventional heater cable.




The characteristics (a) to (f) of the copolymer polyester resin for fusing layer according to the present invention are significantly identical to those desired for the fusing layer of a heater cable. The heater cable of the present invention fabricated using the same resin is hence highly sensitive and rigorous in the fusing action (the response to a temperature) and will be most ideal as featuring the fusing function. In particular, the moisture absorption is substantially ½ smaller than of nylon-12. This allows the fusing layer to be diminished in the moisture absorption and declination in the precision of the fusing function due to the moisture absorption will be minimized.




In the heater cable according to the present invention, the fusing layer resin which plays the most significant role of the heater cable fusing function has the anti-heat deterioration 1.7 times higher than that made of nylon-12 and is highly improved in the operating life. Consequently, a higher quality of the heater cable with the fusing function can be provided which is reliable in the performance.




Also, the copolymer polyester resin of the present invention is remarkably flexible thus giving a higher resiliency of the heater cable. This permits the heater cable to be wired and located with much ease in a base material during the production of a sheet-like heating body, thus notably increasing the productivity. Moreover, the melt viscosity (900 poises at 220° C.) of the copolymer polyester resin of the present invention is as small as substantially ⅕ that of nylon-12 (4500 poises at 220° C.). This allows a common tubing extruder to be used for forming the fusing layer and at the same time, significantly increases the extrusion speed. Accordingly, since the production cost of the heater cable is declined, the present invention contributes to the development of industrial applications.



Claims
  • 1. A cable comprising:a heater cable; and a lead cable, the heater cable including: a core thread; a heating element wire wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the core thread; a fusing layer coated over the heating element wire; a signal wire wound in a spiral on the outer surface of the fusing layer; and a protective coating provided over the signal wire; the lead cable including: an insulating coating; and a conductive wire covered at an outer surface thereof with the insulating coating; and the heater cable and the lead cable running adjacent one another and being spaced from each other by a distance of 0 to 10 mm and being capable of being supplied with opposite flows of current.
  • 2. The cable according to claim 1, wherein the fusing layer is made of copolymer polyester resin having fusing function characteristics of:an angle α between the baseline and a tangent to the heat absorption peak of a DSC curve defined by a JIS K7121 method being 90° to 120°; an angle α′ between the baseline and a tangent to the shift portion of a TMA curve determined in an expansion mode by a thermal-mechanical measuring method being 90° to 100°; a melting point being 160° C. to 210° C.; a reduction viscosity being not lower than 0.5 dl/g; a moisture absorption being not higher than 1.0% at a temperature of 20° C. and a relative moisture rate of 65%; and a hardness measured by a JIS K7215 method being HDD 40 to 74.
  • 3. The cable according to claim 1, wherein an anti-heat deterioration of the fusing layer stands for 500 hours at a temperature of 140° C.
  • 4. The cable according to claim 1, wherein the fusing layer is made of copolymer polyester resin having fusing function characteristics of:an angle α between the baseline and a tangent to the heat absorption peak of a DSC curve defined by a JIS K7121 method being 90° to 120°; a melting point being 160° C. to 210° C.; a reduction viscosity being not lower than 0.5 dl/g; a moisture absorption being not higher than 1.0 % at a temperature of 20° C. and a relative moisture rate of 65%; and a hardness measured by a JIS K7215 method being HDD 40 to 74.
  • 5. The cable according to claim 1, wherein the fusing layer is made of copolymer polyester resin having fusing function characteristics of:an angle α′ between the baseline and a tangent to the shift portion of a TMA curve determined in an expansion mode by a thermal-mechanical measuring method being 90° to 100°; a melting point being 160° C. to 210° C.; a reduction viscosity being not lower than 0.5 dl/g; a moisture absorption being not higher than 1.0% at a temperature of 20° C. and a relative moisture rate of 65%; and a hardness measured by a JIS K7215 method being HDD 40 to 74.
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
9260040 Oct 1997 JP
2961590 Oct 1999 JP
11354262 Dec 1999 JP