This application claims the priority of United Kingdom Application No. 1707513.6, filed May 10, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to a heater and in particular a heater for a hand held appliance, for example a hair care appliance.
Hand held appliances such as hair care appliances and hot air blowers are known. Such appliances are provided with a heater to heat either fluid flowing through the appliance or a surface at which the appliance is directed. Most devices are either in the form of a pistol grip with a handle including switches and a body which houses components such as a fan unit and a heater. Another form is for a tubular housing such as found with hot styling devices. Thus, generally the option is to have fluid and/or heat blowing out of an end of a tubular housing and either to hold onto that housing or be provided with a handle orthogonal to the tubular housing.
Traditional heaters are often made from a scaffold of an insulating and heat resistant material around which a resistive wire such as nichrome wire is wound. Such heaters can produce power outputs of up to around 1200 to 1500 W which are suitable for hair care appliances however these heaters are relatively heavy and to achieve such power outputs requires complex packaging of metres of wiring. A different type of heater can be made using the properties of a power self-limiting positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material, for example a doped barium titanate oxide, which is sandwiched between two conducting surfaces. Heat is dissipated into an airflow using fins. A single PTC heater can achieve up to around 200 W and a temperature of up to 260° C. and can be used in series (subject to an increase in the size and weight of the appliance) to increase the power and therefore the heat that can be produced.
According to some embodiments, a high power density heater has the advantages of being lightweight, with simplified packaging where the heater element can withstand operating temperatures of at least 400° C. In some embodiments, a single heating element may be provided. Throughout this specification, the term heater element refers to the resistive track which is embedded into a ceramic material and the heater comprises the heater element along with heat dissipating elements.
According to some embodiments, a heater may include a high temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) heating element. Fins may be attached to each side of the heating element to enhance heat dissipation. The fins may be made from a thermally conducting material, for example copper, aluminium or their alloys which are attached to the heating element. There may a mismatch in thermal conductivity between the heater element and the heat dissipation fins. This may cause a number of issues. Firstly, when the fins are attached, the process may be carried out at a high temperature. This can create residual stresses at the interface between the ceramic and the metal as the part is cooled. The ceramic can also fracture when first cooled down in the furnace if the stress in the ceramic exceeds a critical limit. The thermal cycle of the process may be important to limit this. Secondly, the heater will be cycled between room temperature and the maximum operating temperature of the appliance during use and this cycling can cause a build-up of residual stress which may lead to failure if it exceeds a critical limit.
The thermal stresses are less critical in a low power heater as the energy being provided to the heater element and the maximum temperature achieved at the joint is significantly less. Additionally, the manufacture of the heater can use room temperature bonding methods as the temperature reached by the heater during use is significantly reduced. Thus, according to some embodiments, a ceramic heater has an element capable of withstanding a power input of up to 1800 W.
As well as the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficient there is the bond between the ceramic material and the fins. At the bond there is an interface between the two materials that allows for the thermal expansion mismatched materials to interact, which may raise stress at the interface, and which may result in failure of one or both materials. The bond should be sufficient to achieve adequate heat exchange between the heater element and the fin and to withstand the thermal cycling that an appliance containing the heater would see during its lifetime. Thus, the fatigue strength of the joint should be sufficient to withstand thermal cycling of the interface between room temperature and peak operating temperature and the melting point of the constituent parts should be higher than the max operating temperature of the interface.
In a first embodiment, a heater comprises a ceramic heater element and at least two fins for dissipating heat from the ceramic heater element, wherein the ceramic heater element extends along a plane in one dimension and the at least two fins extend away from the plane, and wherein the at least two fins are connected to the ceramic heater element via discrete connecting portions.
Having discrete connecting portions means that the fin is not connected along its entire length; there are gaps or breaks in the connection. These gaps enable the stress between the fin and the heater element to be relieved. When the heater is at high temperature or transitioning to or from ambient temperature, the fin material will expand or contract more than the heater element. The gaps or breaks enable the fin material to expand and deform somewhat without causing excessive stress to the heater element. In other words for a given temperature rise, the stress between the heater element and fins is reduced when such gaps are introduced.
Preferably, the discrete connecting portions are a plurality of substantially similar areas of contact between the ceramic heater element and the at least two fins. This uniformity is beneficial as without it, the thermal mismatch would vary along the length of the fin at its interface with the heating element causing certain areas to be more prone to cracking and/or debonding.
In a preferred embodiment, the discrete connecting portions are each separated by a similar sized gap and distance between gaps (gap frequency). Again this uniformity is beneficial for a uniform shaped heater as without it, the thermal mismatch would vary along the length of the fin causing certain areas to be more prone to cracking and/or debonding. Alternatively, for a non-uniform heater for example a curved heater, different gap sizes and gap frequency can be applied in adjacent regions of the heater to deliver appropriate stress relieve dependent on operating temperature.
The fin is formed from a metal sheet which is processed to produce the discrete connecting portions. The fin preferably has a thickness of 0.2 mm to 0.5 mm. In one embodiment, the gaps between the discrete connecting portions are formed by electric discharge machining (EDM). This effectively produces a plurality of parallel slots that extend from one edge of the metal sheet towards the distal end. A second stage is to produce the discrete connecting portions; this is achieved by bending the metal sheet in a 90° V-press tool. This forms a plurality of “L-shaped” features having a leg portion which forms part of the fin proper and a foot portion which forms the discrete connecting portion for each leg.
Preferably, the fin has a thickness and a gap size between adjacent discrete connecting portions is between 0.8 and 1.2 times the fin thickness.
In a preferred embodiment, the ceramic heater element comprises an electrically resistive track located between layers of ceramic material. Preferably, the ceramic heater element is an HTCC, meaning that the track is applied to ceramic material in its green state, covered with another layer of the ceramic material and then the heater element is sintered as a single unit.
Preferably, the at least two fins are disposed on each side of the ceramic heater element. This also assists in thermal management of the heater as heat is drawn and dissipated on both sides of the heater from a centrally located resistive track. It also tends to protect the heater element from flexural loads during thermal cycling.
Preferably, the heater comprises a plurality of fins extending from both sides of the ceramic heater element. The ceramic heater element extends from a first edge to a second edge along the plane. In a preferred embodiment, the plurality of fins vary in height from the first edge to the second edge. As hand held appliances and in particular hair care appliances are often tubular in shape, this enables a traditional shape for the heater to be used.
In addition, it is advantageous that the plurality of fins are substantially equally spaced between the first edge and the second edge. This again assists in managing the thermal mismatch across the fin by reducing the thermal gradient across the ceramic heating element. Thus the gaps between the discrete portions manage the stresses caused by the difference in the thermal expansion coefficient in one direction and the spacing between the fins manages the stresses caused by the difference in the thermal gradient in a second direction.
As previously described, it is known to produce PTC heaters in hair care appliances but to produce low power heaters. The PTC material is a ceramic, which is sandwiched between two conducting surfaces. These can be formed in a honeycomb shape where air flows through the apertures formed by the honeycomb. The heat transfer rate can be improved by adding heat dispersing features to the electrodes and this is relatively simple as the electrodes are formed from a conductive, usually metallic, material and the heat dispersing features are also thermally conductive so a metal is generally used so attaching one to the other can be done easily. The two parts can be glued together to form a good bond. There are minimal issues relating to thermal expansion firstly, as the PTC heater does not reach the higher temperatures needed for a higher power heater and secondly the glue is a flexible material, the mismatch at the interface is resolved by this layer.
Another aspect to the invention relates to attaching a metal heat dispersing fin to a ceramic surface.
According to some embodiments, a method of attaching a metal fin to a ceramic heater element includes the steps of:
(a) applying a filler material to a surface of the ceramic heater element;
(b) positioning a metal fin over the filler material to produce a heater template;
(c) brazing the heater template in a furnace at a temperature of between 750° C. and 900° C. to melt the filler and cause the filler and the ceramic heater element to react together.
Preferably, the filler material is an alloy including silver, copper and titanium. More preferably, the alloy is formed from an initial composition of 72% silver and 28% copper to which 1-5 weight % titanium is added. The titanium increases reactivity and reacts with the ceramic heater element forming complex inter-metallic phases. The temperature must be high in order to melt the filler material but not so high as to melt the metal fin. The fin is preferably made from one of copper, stainless steel and kovar.
Preferably, the method includes the additional steps of:
(i) coating a surface of the ceramic heater element with a metallisation paste;
(ii) sintering the coated ceramic heater element;
(iii) electroless plating of a nickel layer on the sintered coated ceramic heater element to produce a primary metallised surface;
(iv) applying a flux to the primary metallised surface; wherein steps (i) to (iv) are carried out prior to step (a) and wherein step (c) additionally melts the flux located between the metal fin and the primary metallised surface and is carried out at a temperature of around 600° C.
According to some embodiments, an alternative method of attaching a metal fin to a ceramic heater element includes:
(a) coating a surface of the ceramic heater element with a metallisation paste;
(b) sintering the coated ceramic heater element to produce a primary metallised surface;
(c) electroless plating of a nickel layer on the sintered coated ceramic heater element to produce secondary metallisation layer over the primary metallisation layer;
(d) heating the nickel plated ceramic heater element to diffuse the nickel layer into the primary metallisation layer;
(e) applying a flux to the metallised surface to produce a metallised surface;
(f) applying a filler material over the flux;
(g) positioning a metal fin over the filler material to produce a heater template;
(h) brazing the heater template in a furnace to melt the filler and flux located between the metal fin and the metallised surface.
Preferably the brazing is carried out at between around 550° C. and 650° C. Most preferably the temperature is 610° C.
Preferably, the ceramic heater element is a multi-layered ceramic substrate comprising a resistive track printed onto an internal layer whilst the substrate is in its green state. Preferably, the resistive track is tungsten. The ceramic material is one of aluminium nitride, aluminium oxide, silicon nitride beryllium oxide, zirconia and silicon carbide. Preferably, the ceramic material is aluminium nitride. The temperature at which the ceramic heater element is sintered will depend on the material used amongst other things, in the case of aluminium nitride, the temperature is preferably above 1800° C.
Preferably, the metallisation paste comprises ceramic material used to form the ceramic heater element, a refractory material such as tungsten plus binders and fillers. In a preferred embodiment, the refractory material is one of tungsten, platinum, molybdenum or their alloys. Preferably, the refractory material is tungsten. It is preferred that the metallisation paste is applied to the ceramic heater element at a thickness of 10 to 12 microns.
Preferably, the coated ceramic heater element is sintered under the same conditions as the ceramic heater element. This is advantageous especially when the same ceramic material is used as the shrinkage of the coating will be substantially similar to the shrinkage of the ceramic heater element so thermal stresses between the two layers will be minimised.
Preferably, the nickel layer is electroplated via brush electroplating, dip electroplating or electroless plating. In a preferred embodiment, a 3-5 micron thick layer of nickel is plated.
Preferably, the flux is applied to the metallised surface as a paste. Preferably, the filler material is made from a foil.
Preferably, the metal fin is formed from an aluminium alloy. Whilst other metals and alloys are suitable, for example, copper, stainless steel and kovar, it is preferred to use a material having a relatively low elastic modulus and a lower yield strength. A lower elastic modulus reduces the amount of stress at the ceramic-fin interface due to thermal expansion induced strain. A lower yield strength means that the metal is more likely to deform at higher temperatures which reduces the stress on the ceramic around the joint.
In a further embodiment, a method of manufacturing a ceramic heater element capable of operating at a temperature of 400° C. includes:
(a) producing an HTCC heater element;
(b) coating a surface of the ceramic heater element with a metallisation paste;
(c) sintering the coated ceramic heater element to produce a primary metallised surface;
(d) electroless plating of a nickel layer on the sintered coated ceramic heater element to produce a produce secondary metallisation layer over the primary metallisation layer;
(e) heating the nickel plated ceramic heater element to diffuse the nickel layer into the primary metallisation layer to produce a metallised surface;
(f) applying a flux to the metallised surface;
(g) applying a filler material over the flux;
(h) producing a heat dispersing fin having a plurality of discrete connecting portions wherein each adjacent pair of discrete connecting portions is separated by a space;
(i) positioning a heat dissipating fin over the filler material whereby the plurality of discrete connecting portions are adjacent the filler material to produce a heater template;
(j) brazing the heater template in a furnace to melt the filler and flux located between the metal fin and the metallised surface.
Preferably, the discrete connecting portions are a plurality of substantially similar areas of contact between the ceramic heater element and the at least two fins. In a preferred embodiment, the discrete connecting portions are each separated by a similar sized gap or space.
Preferably, the gaps or spaces between the discrete connecting portions are formed by EDM. This effectively produces a plurality of parallel slots that extend from one edge of the metal sheet towards the distal end. A second stage is to produce the discrete connecting portions; this is achieved by bending the metal sheet in a 90° V-press tool. This forms a plurality of “L-shaped” features having a leg portion which forms part of the fin proper and a foot portion which forms the discrete connecting portion for each leg.
Preferably, the heater comprises a plurality of heat dissipating fins which extend from both sides of the ceramic heater element.
In a preferred embodiment, the ceramic heater is formed from a rectangular ceramic heater element resulting in a generally tubular or square heater. Alternatively, the ceramic heater element is arcuate. Preferably, the arcuate ceramic heater element has a constant curvature. In a preferred embodiment, the arcuate ceramic heater element in formed having an inner radius and an outer radius which both extend from a common origin.
For an arcuate heater, the fins are preferably curved. More preferably, the fins match the curvature of the ceramic heater element. To form curved fins, following the second stage of production where the discrete connecting portions are formed, there is a third stage of stamping the fins is a curved tool.
For this embodiment, it is advantageous to varying the spacing of the fins between the inner radius and the outer radius of the ceramic heater element. The spacing between adjacent fins increase from the inner radius to the outer radius. The reason for this is twofold, firstly as the path length within the heater is shorter at the inner radius it is less restrictive for the fluid flowing through the heater, thus to get a more even flow across an outlet of the heater it needs to be made more restrictive. Secondly, as the path length is longer at the outer radius the dwell time is longer so fluid flowing through this part can be relatively hotter than the fluid flowing at the inner radius. Thus, by making the spacing larger at the outer radius there is more fluid flowing through that region which makes the thermal variation at the heater outlet less. The variation in air outlet temperature across the exit plane is lower, and the variation in temperature across the ceramic heating element is lower
The invention will now be described by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
According to some embodiments, a method includes a first step of making an HTCC heater element. Three exemplary materials for the element include aluminium oxide, aluminium nitride and silicon nitride. Commercially available materials may be used. For example, materials commercially available from Precision Ceramics (e.g., with the grade of alumina being 99.6% alumina, product description AT 79, the grade of aluminium nitride available in 2015, and the silicon nitride, product description SL 200 BG). The ceramic heater elements may be formed initially from a rectangular substrate which when sintered forms 70 mm×30 mm×0.5 mm coupons. A first layer of the green state ceramic may have a tungsten track screen printed onto a surface. The tungsten may be formed into a slurry with material of the same composition as the ceramic used to form the heater element and then a second layer of the green state ceramic may be applied. This may be sintered at over 1000° C., for example, around 1800° C. The resulting embedded tungsten track may have a thickness of 18-20 microns.
Table 1 shows different exemplary combinations of ceramic and metal that were evaluated.
The brazing process was carried out on coupons (rectangular portions) of 70 mm×30 mm×0.5 mm of the ceramic heater element 10 in a vacuum furnace at 850° C. using a braze filler 20. The braze filler was 0.05 mm thick foil of AgCuTi active brazing, the metal 30 was only applied to one side of the ceramic which resulted in post brazing warpage and could account for some of the failures. Table 2 details the post brazing survival rate for the different combinations.
Without being bound by any theory, it is thought that the stainless steel samples failed as a result of the brazing process being below the temperature of plastic deformation for this alloy thus, the metal side of the joint can only deform elastically which introduces stress into the joint. Conversely, copper can yield to reduce the build-up of stresses.
A further investigation used heat dissipating fins. The fins 44, 54 are planar sheets which extend orthogonally away from a base portion 42, 56 respectively. In
The surviving samples were tested by thermally cycling them but all failed by cracking at the metal ceramic joint due to a build-up of stress. For the copper samples this is believed to be via cold working which increases the strength of the copper over time along with a mismatch ion the coefficient of thermal expansion.
A third trial was carried out using an aluminium heat dispersing fin 60 (
Referring now to
For straight fins, the metal sheet profiles were cut with EDM wire (
Having individual fins 60 may require a fixture to keep all fins in place during brazing; the material chosen was graphite due to the temperatures of the brazing process and as it would not react. A fixture was designed and is shown in
As the fins are aluminium, active brazing was not used (the temperature is too high).
The process was carried out as follows. First the surfaces of the ceramic heater element 10 were first cleaned thoroughly then coated with a primary metallizing layer 100. This is a 10-12 micron tungsten layer which is screen printed onto each side of the ceramic heater element. The tungsten is applied as an element in a metallisation paste and then coated part is sintered. The same ceramic material is used as a component in the tungsten paste so the same sintering conditions are used.
The secondary layer 110, on top of the tungsten, is a 3-5 micron electroless nickel coating. For this trial the nickel alloy used was Ni-11P coating (near the eutectic). The process is also known as an ‘electrolytic’ or ‘autocatalytic’ process. This nickel layer prevents surface oxidation of the tungsten layer in air and improves wetting of the braze filler. A heat treatment at approximately 800° C. in a reducing atmosphere is used to diffuse this layer into the tungsten primary layer.
As an alternative to using electroless plating, other forms of electroplating can be used, for example brush electroplating or dip electroplating.
A flux material is applied to each electroplated surface. One example of a flux is Harris Al braze-1070 flux which was applied using a brush applicator. On each side of the metallised ceramic heater element 100, 110 initially 0.082+/−0.003 g was used. In a further test 0.0808+/−0.002 g was added per side. The flux material contains both aluminium and silicon and melts during the brazing process, removing oxides and improving the wetting of the surfaces. The addition of silicon as an alloying element in the filler lowers the melting point and the viscosity of the molten metal, which improves the alloy's gap-filling capability. The eutectic composition allows the lowest melting point of the binary alloy, and lowest viscosity (a transition from a single solid phase to a single liquid phase).
Finally, a braze filler material 120 is applied over the flux material. An example of a filler material is Prince and Izant Al-718. This is provided as a foil which is 590 microns thick. In a first example a single sheet of the foil was used providing 0.271+/−0.004 g of filler material per side. A second example used 0.527+/−0.006 g of filler material per side (two 50 micron foil layers per side).
Another example of a suitable material is NOCOLOK® Sil Flux” from Solvay. This combines filler and flux in one paste so removes the need for two step application.
The heat sink material chosen was Al1050-O grade which is a commercially pure grade that has undergone an annealing heat treatment process. The heat sink is a non-traditional ‘finned heat sink’ because the ‘heat sink base’ has been removed and only the fins are used. These fins are directly bonded to the heat generating surface using a ‘flanged tee’ joint.
The fins 60 are created from rolled sheet through EDM wire cutting and bending processes. As part of the cutting process, small cuts are created at the bottom of the fins. This effectively produces a plurality of legs 64 and inbetween each adjacent pair of legs, parallel slots 66 that extend from one edge of the metal sheet towards the distal end. A second stage is to produce the discrete connecting portions; this is achieved by bending the metal sheet in a 90° V-press tool. This forms a plurality of “L-shaped” features having a leg 64 which forms part of the fin proper and a foot portion which forms the discrete connecting portion 62 for each leg.
The brazing process is carried out in a furnace. Some samples were brazed in a vacuum furnace but this was found to be unnecessary and increased the dwell time required as only radiation was used to heat the sample. Further processes were carried out in a reducing atmosphere at approximately one atmosphere of pressure. The heater template is assembled within an enclosure 200, 210 and placed in the furnace at room temperature and then heated to around 610° C. in an atmosphere of 95% nitrogen and 5% hydrogen. The heating process took around an hour, in this case this was the highest for the furnace used and potentially higher rates could be used which would reduce the brazing time. The temperature was held for a pre-determined time and then cooled to room temperature. The pre-determined time was around 2 minutes, but this is dependent on the thermal mass of the enclosure 200, 210 and the heater so is subject to change dependent on these factors.
After removal from the furnace, the heater was washed in an ultrasonic hot water bath at 40° C. to remove flux residue from between the discrete connecting portions.
Theoretically, this joint should not work due to Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) mismatch between the ceramic and the metal. Also, if the two materials were joined without fracture of the ceramic, the joint would not survive many thermal cycles.
By using individual fins 60, there is a reduction in the contact area between the heat sink and the ceramic heating element 10 this limits the problems caused by the mismatch is thermal expansion coefficient in one orientation—across the width of the ceramic heater element. In addition, by having the discrete points of contact 62 along each individual fin 60, the problem caused by the mismatch is thermal expansion coefficient in another orientation—along the length of the ceramic heater element 10. The discrete connecting portions act as stress relief cuts.
A few variations in the form of the ceramic heater will now be discussed. The fins 60 may be all of the same height as shown in
As previously described,
As an alternative to the connectors being provided along an edge of the ceramic heater element 150,
Referring now to
The ceramic heater element herein described is designed to withstand 400° C. with a power input of 1500 W at a maximum fluid temperature at the outlet of 125° C. Table 4 shows a range of parameters that were achieved.
Within the hairdryer shown in
The invention has been described in detail with respect to a hairdryer and a hot styling device however, it is applicable to any appliance that draws in a fluid and directs the outflow of that fluid from the appliance.
The appliance can be used with or without a heater; the action of the outflow of fluid at high velocity has a drying effect.
The fluid that flows through the appliance is generally air, but may be a different combination of gases or gas and can include additives to improve performance of the appliance or the impact the appliance has on an object the output is directed at for example, hair and the styling of that hair.
The invention is not limited to the detailed description given above. Variations will be apparent to the person skilled in the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1707513 | May 2017 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1755790 | Nevel | Apr 1930 | A |
2261136 | Brown, Jr. | Nov 1941 | A |
2261137 | Brown, Jr. | Nov 1941 | A |
2298250 | Brown, Jr. | Oct 1942 | A |
2578305 | Huet | Dec 1951 | A |
2644225 | Dietz | Jul 1953 | A |
2789797 | Simpelaar | Apr 1957 | A |
3205560 | Loehlein | Sep 1965 | A |
3266661 | Dates | Aug 1966 | A |
3396458 | Meng | Aug 1968 | A |
3848111 | Brouneus | Nov 1974 | A |
4286377 | Hurko et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4352008 | Hofer | Sep 1982 | A |
4414052 | Habata | Nov 1983 | A |
4471213 | Yoshida | Sep 1984 | A |
4558209 | Hess | Dec 1985 | A |
4611238 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4715430 | Arnold | Dec 1987 | A |
4820903 | Ishida | Apr 1989 | A |
4822980 | Carbone | Apr 1989 | A |
5077889 | Matsuda | Jan 1992 | A |
5177341 | Balderson | Jan 1993 | A |
5243683 | Yang | Sep 1993 | A |
5753893 | Noda et al. | May 1998 | A |
6089314 | Becker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6735082 | Self | May 2004 | B2 |
6852955 | Golan | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7082032 | Barsun | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7335855 | von der Luhe | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7355148 | Boussier | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7725011 | Boussier | May 2010 | B2 |
8051896 | Wayman | Nov 2011 | B2 |
9273724 | Rosenholm | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9338827 | Braun | May 2016 | B2 |
20010001416 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20040139709 | Illingworth et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040244959 | Chien | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256380 | Wu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060087398 | Wu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060289475 | Tung et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033825 | Lo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070114219 | Rizzuto, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080179314 | Colja et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090000143 | Bazzicalupo et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090178795 | Wei | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194519 | Funaki et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090293300 | Merritt | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035024 | Datta | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100111510 | Lo | May 2010 | A1 |
20110079378 | Bajusz | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130087549 | Wang | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20190357653 | Guerreiro et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190380463 | Guerreiro et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1152371 | Jun 1997 | CN |
2314542 | Apr 1999 | CN |
2345907 | Oct 1999 | CN |
1278745 | Jan 2001 | CN |
2509489 | Sep 2002 | CN |
2597867 | Jan 2004 | CN |
2750243 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1882200 | Dec 2006 | CN |
2917159 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101008287 | Aug 2007 | CN |
201054804 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101289328 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101312603 | Nov 2008 | CN |
201700020 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102355758 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102423184 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102538547 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102833896 | Dec 2012 | CN |
102883483 | Jan 2013 | CN |
103079339 | May 2013 | CN |
202918516 | May 2013 | CN |
103546998 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103836595 | Jun 2014 | CN |
204757782 | Nov 2015 | CN |
204968132 | Jan 2016 | CN |
205624989 | Oct 2016 | CN |
205909491 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106604422 | Apr 2017 | CN |
106859485 | Jun 2017 | CN |
23 59 478 | Jun 1975 | DE |
26 26 409 | Dec 1977 | DE |
19637431 | Mar 1998 | DE |
10109734 | Sep 2002 | DE |
10 2005 026 496 | Jul 2006 | DE |
102008003975 | Jul 2009 | DE |
0004145 | Sep 1979 | EP |
0053508 | Jun 1982 | EP |
0 207 677 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0 368 206 | May 1990 | EP |
0 942 468 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1070459 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 657 993 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2 000 042 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2 217 989 | Nov 2004 | ES |
2142816 | Feb 1973 | FR |
2784274 | Apr 2000 | FR |
2 848 685 | Jun 2004 | FR |
2855709 | Dec 2004 | FR |
2 862 374 | May 2005 | FR |
883547 | Nov 1961 | GB |
1356753 | Jun 1974 | GB |
1539485 | Jan 1979 | GB |
1539485 | Jan 1979 | GB |
2 261 351 | May 1993 | GB |
52-78838 | Jun 1977 | JP |
S55-23672 | Feb 1980 | JP |
S55-55104 | Apr 1980 | JP |
57-120047 | Jul 1982 | JP |
63-10563 | Jan 1988 | JP |
2-10683 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2-94384 | Apr 1990 | JP |
2-153868 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2-191303 | Jul 1990 | JP |
3-182088 | Aug 1991 | JP |
4-104493 | Apr 1992 | JP |
4-348701 | Dec 1992 | JP |
H7-37095 | Aug 1995 | JP |
H9-213455 | Aug 1997 | JP |
H10-160249 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-209357 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2821749 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-017080 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-097156 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2001-60784 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2003-068565 | Mar 2003 | JP |
10-0503262 | Jul 2005 | KR |
10-2012-0019911 | Mar 2012 | KR |
10-2012-0071098 | Jul 2012 | KR |
10-2012-0113927 | Oct 2012 | KR |
10-1277264 | Jun 2013 | KR |
10-2015-0000234 | Jan 2015 | KR |
WO-9611372 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9922844 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-2006055946 | May 2006 | WO |
2007135644 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007135773 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2012087021 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2017046559 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2018130832 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Evaluation Report mailed Feb. 5, 2019, directed to CN Application No. 2018206919738; 7 pages. |
Notification of Reason for Rejection dated Jul. 29, 2019, directed to JP Application No. 2018-091457; 6 pages. |
Search Report dated Oct. 12, 2017, directed to GB Application No. 1707513.6; 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 11, 2018, directed to PCT/GB2018/050070; 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 18, 2018, directed to PCT/GB2018/051028; 17 pages. |
Further Search Report dated Apr. 10, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1707513.6; 2 pages. |
Examination Report dated Feb. 27, 2020, directed to GB Application No. 1707513.6; 3 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for standard patent application dated May 15, 2020, directed to AU Application No. 2018265351; 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2020, directed to JP Application No. 2019-233802; 4 pages. |
The First Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2020, directed to CN Application No. 201880052111.3; 19 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Nov. 12, 2020, directed to SG Application No. 11201909639Y; 7 pages. |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201810441952.5, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 21 pages (13 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document). |
Office Action received for European Application No. 18721112, dated Jul. 1, 2021, 6 pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880006876.3, dated Aug. 31, 2021, 19 pages (11 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180328624 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |