1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to heat transfer including the transportation of heat energy. More specifically, the present invention is related to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) applications, especially liquid heating and cooling.
2. Description of the Related Art
There are many applications where it is desirable to move heat energy. For example, in the field of air-conditioning, heat energy is moved either out of or into a body of air within a building, vehicle, or other enclosed space. Such systems generally operate in the context of the co-efficient of performance (COP)—the ratio of the energy gained by the body of air relative to the energy input. Many air conditioning systems operate with a COP of 2 to 3.5.
Water heating also invokes various heat transportation applications. Many water heating systems rely upon the direct application of heat energy to a body of water in order to raise temperature. As a result, the COP of such systems is usually limited to 1. While water heating systems could theoretically be devised utilizing certain operating principles of air conditioning and refrigeration systems, the increased capital expenses of such a system typically are not justified by the corresponding gain in performance.
A vapor compression system, as found in many air-conditioning applications, generally includes a compressor, a condenser, and an evaporator. These systems also tend to include an expansion device. In a prior art vapor compression system, a gas is compressed whereby the temperature of that gas is increased beyond that of the ambient temperature. The compressed gas is then run through a condenser and turned into a liquid. The condensed and liquefied gas is then taken through an expansion device, which drops the pressure and the corresponding temperature. The resulting refrigerant is then boiled in an evaporator.
A corresponding drop in temperature accompanies the drop in pressure, which is reflected as a temperature drop to (approximately) 34° F. in
The cycle related to the system 100 of
A system like that described in
Haloalkane refrigerants such as tetrafluoroethane (CH2FCF3) are inert gases that are commonly used as high-temperature refrigerants in refrigerators and automobile air conditioners. Tetrafluoroethane has also been used to cool over-clocked computers. These inert, refrigerant gases are more commonly referred to as R-134 gases. The volume of an R-134 gas can be 600-1000 times greater than the corresponding liquid, which evidences the need for an improved vapor compression system that more fully recognizes system potential and overcomes technical barriers related to compressor performance.
A first claimed embodiment of the present invention includes a heat transfer method. Through the method, cavitation is caused in a fluid flow in a first region thereby providing a multi-phase fluid with vapor bubbles. The cavitation may be caused by reducing the pressure. A localized drop in temperature of the multi-phase fluid may result as a consequence of the cavitation. The multi-phase fluid travels from the first location to a second location over a period of time during which heat energy is absorbed from a proximate heat source. The vapor bubbles are permitted to collapse in or after the second location.
A second claimed embodiment sets forth a heat transfer system. The system includes a flow path to reduce pressure at a first location in the flow path upon a liquid flowing within the flow path to promote production of vapor bubbles by cavitation, thereby producing a multi-phase fluid with a consequent drop in temperature. A heat exchanger transfers heat from a heat source to the multi-phase fluid over at least a portion of the flow path between a first location and a second location. The second location may be selected based on a substantial proportion of the vapor bubbles within the multi-phase fluid having not collapsed by the time the multi-phase fluid reaches the second location.
In various embodiments, the multi-phase fluid may travel at supersonic speed between a portion of the flow path between the first location and the second location. The flow path may include a fluid pathway within a heat transfer nozzle. The heat transfer nozzle may include an inlet portion, a throat portion, an expansion portion, and an outlet portion. Liquid entering the throat portion may be caused to cavitate thereby producing a multi-phase fluid with vapor bubbles, whereby the multi-phase fluid is caused to travel into and along the expansion portion before the vapor bubbles collapse. Heat energy may be received from a heat source as the multi-phase fluid passes along the expansion portion.
a illustrates a heat transfer nozzle as might be used in the system of
b illustrates a cut-await view of the heat transfer nozzle of
In contrast to the prior art systems of
Cavitation is generally regarded as a problem as it results in turbulence, wasted energy, and a shock wave caused when the bubbles collapse and return to the liquid phase. Cavitation can cause corrosion of mechanical items such as propellers and pipes. Engineers generally go to considerable lengths to avoid or minimize cavitation. In the present context, however, inertial cavitation may be used to provide a refrigeration cycle for use in various HVAC and heat transfer applications. Cavitation may include, but is not limited to, the creation of vapor bubbles within a liquid as a result of reduced pressure regardless of whether said reduction is spontaneous, at a seed particle or at a surface, and therefore is inclusive of nucleation.
Heat energy is transported by a multi-phase fluid including a liquid and vapor bubbles formed by cavitation when the pressure exerted on a portion of the liquid is reduced. The production of vapor from a liquid requires the input of heat energy. Where vapor bubbles are formed in substantial numbers, energy is initially taken from the liquid with the result that the temperature of the liquid falls. Vapor bubbles formed by cavitation collapse readily when the pressure returns above the vapor pressure of the liquid. Heat energy is released and as a result the temperature of the liquid rises.
The inlet portion 12 receives liquid refrigerant from a pumped supply under pressure, typically in the range of 500 kPa to 2000 kPa. Pressures outside this range may be used for specialized applications. The liquid refrigerant is then directed into the throat portion 14 via a funnel-like or other converging exit 21.
The throat portion 14 provides a duct of substantially constant profile (normally circular) through its length through which the liquid refrigerant is forced. The expansion portion 16 provides an expanding tube-like member wherein the diameter of the fluid pathway 20 progressively increases between the throat portion 14 and the outlet portion 18. The actual profile of the expansion portion may depend upon the actual refrigerant used.
The outlet portion 18 provides a region where the refrigerant exiting the nozzle can mix with refrigerant at ambient conditions and thereafter be conveyed away. In use, when liquid refrigerant enters the throat portion, it is caused to accelerate to high speed. The pressure and diameter of the throat orifice may be selected so that the speed of the refrigerant at the entry of the throat orifice is approximately the speed of sound (Mach 1).
At the same time, the acceleration of the refrigerant causes a sudden drop in pressure which results in cavitation and commencing at the boundary between the funnel-like exit 21 of the inlet portion 12 and the entry to the throat orifice 14, but also being triggered along the wall of the throat orifice. Cavitation results in bubbles containing refrigerant in the vapor phase being present within the fluid, thereby providing a multi-phase fluid. The creation of such vapor bubbles requires the input of energy for the input of latent heat of vaporization and as a result the temperature falls. Meanwhile, the reduction in pressure together with the multiphase fluid results in the lowering of the speed of sound with the result that refrigerant exits the throat at supersonic speed of, for example, Mach 1.1 or higher. Within the expansion portion, the pressure continues at a low level and the fluid expands. As a result of the expansion, the flow accelerates further, reaching a speed in the order of approximately Mach 3 further along the expansion portion.
The thermodynamic performance of the nozzle 11 is explained below with reference to
From step 1 to 2 in
Pumppower=Q*ΔP
where Q is the volumetric flow rate and ΔP is the pressure rise across the pump. Since the volumetric flow rate Q for liquid water is orders of magnitude less than the water vapor, significant energy is saved in this phase compared with a vapor compression system.
From step 2 to 3 in
where c denotes the speed of sound and L and V represent the liquid and vapor phases respectively. Once the flow speed exceeds the local sound speed the downstream pressure conditions cannot propagate upstream. In this condition, the flow now behaves like a supersonic nozzle and the parabolic nature of the governing equations can be taken advantage of in order to drive the saturation temperatures down, thereby providing cooling potential.
From step 3 to 4 in
An example of this methodology is shown in
From step 4 to 5 of
Under these operating conditions, all vapor is condensed in the tube. The shock position is controlled by inlet pressure, heat input along the tube, and reservoir back pressure. It is important to note that since the flow in the tube is critical/choked that the impact of backpressure applies to the shock location and does not impact the operating pressure in the tube. In this regard, and finally at step 5 and returning to step 1 in
As discussed previously, the multi-phase fluid “shocks up” to ambient conditions within the nozzle 52 so that the heat transfer method is completed when the refrigerant leaves the nozzle 52. The heated refrigerant is transferred to a second heat exchanger 56 through a line 55 where the absorbed heat energy is removed. The refrigerant is then returned to the pump 51 via line 57.
The air-conditioning system 61 is sized to provide cooling greater than can be provided with a single heat exchange nozzle, and therefore cooling is achieved by a plurality of heat exchange nozzles arranged in parallel proximate the central region of the housing 62. This is an easy and cost effective arrangement due to the relatively small size of the single heat exchange unit. All units are supplied from a manifold fed from the pump.
The housing 62 stores a substantial volume of refrigerant, which may be applicable when water is the refrigerant. As is indicated by arrows 59, refrigerant exits the nozzles into the refrigerant reservoir and then circulates around the housing 62. The walls of the housing 62 become at least part of the second heat exchanger to dispel the heat which is absorbed into the refrigerant in the nozzles. Additional external heat exchangers may be added if necessary in the application.
In the system 50 of
For example, the volumetric expansion of refrigerants such as R-123a and R-134a are considerably less than that of water, and it is therefore necessary to reduce the rate of expansion in the expansion portion. For R-134a refrigerants, the expansion half-angle (the angle between the central axis of the nozzle and the wall of the expansion portion) may be on the order of 1°. For R-123a, on the other hand, the half-angle may be on the order of 5° while, for water, the angle is even larger. A nozzle as may be suitable for R-134a is illustrated in
A still further embodiment is illustrated in
As discussed with respect to
The thermodynamics and mechanics of the present systems can be further enhanced through application of nanotechnology. This may be especially true in the context of water as a refrigerant. For instance, high heat transfer coefficients in the sonic multiphase cooling regime may be achieved. Application of highly conductive nano-particles to the flow may help increase the effective thermo-conductivity and enhance heat transfer rates. Inclusion of nano-particle agglomerate can have an effect on the cavitation phenomena in the throat.
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, modifications may be made without departing from the essential teachings of the present invention. Various alternative systems may be utilized to implement the various methodologies described herein and various methods may be used to achieve certain results from the aforementioned systems.
The present application is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/876,985, filed Sep. 7, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/240,153 filed Sep. 4, 2009. The disclosures of each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1860447 | Bergdoll | May 1932 | A |
2928779 | Weills et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3228848 | Fellows | Jan 1966 | A |
3425486 | Burton et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3510266 | Midler, Jr. | May 1970 | A |
3548589 | Cooke-Yarborough | Dec 1970 | A |
3552120 | Beale | Jan 1971 | A |
3621667 | Makadam | Nov 1971 | A |
3866433 | Krug | Feb 1975 | A |
4031712 | Costello | Jun 1977 | A |
4044558 | Benson | Aug 1977 | A |
4057962 | Belaire | Nov 1977 | A |
4201263 | Anderson | May 1980 | A |
4333796 | Flynn | Jun 1982 | A |
4442675 | Wilensky | Apr 1984 | A |
4858155 | Okawa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4998415 | Larsen | Mar 1991 | A |
5074759 | Cossairt | Dec 1991 | A |
5083429 | Veres et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5205648 | Fissenko | Apr 1993 | A |
5275486 | Fissenko | Jan 1994 | A |
5317905 | Johnson | Jun 1994 | A |
5338113 | Fissenko | Aug 1994 | A |
5353602 | Pincus | Oct 1994 | A |
5544961 | Fuks et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5659173 | Putterman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5810037 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6170289 | Brown | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6604376 | Demarco et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6655165 | Eisenhour | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6719817 | Marin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6739141 | Sienel et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6835484 | Fly | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6889754 | Kroliczek et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7004240 | Kroliczek et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7131294 | Manole | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7178353 | Cowans et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7251889 | Kroliczek et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7381241 | Tessien et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387093 | Hacsi | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387660 | Tessien et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399545 | Fly | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415835 | Cowans et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7448790 | Tessien et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7549461 | Kroliczek et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7654095 | Sullivan | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7656808 | Manthoulis et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7708053 | Kroliczek et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7721569 | Manole | May 2010 | B2 |
7726135 | Sullivan | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7765820 | Cowans et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796389 | Edmunds et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20020090047 | Stringham | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050048339 | Fly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060018419 | Tessien | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018420 | Tessien | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032625 | Angelis et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060191049 | Elkins et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070028646 | Oshitani et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070271939 | Ichigaya | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080277098 | Fly | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090272128 | Ali | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293513 | Sullivan | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100090469 | Sullivan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100126212 | May | May 2010 | A1 |
20100154445 | Sullivan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100287954 | Harman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110030390 | Charamko et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048048 | Gielda et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110048062 | Gielda et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110048066 | Gielda et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110051549 | Debus et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 080 648 | Jul 2001 | EP |
2002130770 | May 2002 | JP |
2003021410 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003034135 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004072567 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2006137850 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2009070728 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009123674 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010042467 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Energy Efficiency Manual, “Compression Cooling,” D.R. Wulfinghoff, 1999, pp. 1299-1321. |
M.Guglielmone et al., Heat Recovery from Vapor Compression Air Conditioning: A Brief Introduction, Turbotec Products, Inc., May 14, 2008. |
Robert H. Turner, Water Consumption of Evaporative Cooling Systems,'21st Intersociety Energy Conservation Engineering Conference, San Diego, California, Aug. 25-29, 1986. |
S. Klein et al., “Solar Refrigeration,” American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Ashrae Journal, vol. 47 No. 9, Sep. 2005. |
NASA Tech Briefs, “Vapor-Compression Solar Refrigerator Without Batteries,” Sep. 2001, http://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/7426. |
Wikipedia, “Stirling engine,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling—engine, visited May 3, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,633, filed Mar. 15, 2011, David Halt, Supersonic Cooling Nozzle With Airfoils. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,062, filed Apr. 14, 2011, Serguei Charamko, Cooling System Utilizing a Reciprocating Piston. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,593, filed Apr. 18, 2011, Serguei Charamko, Cooling System Utilizing a Conical Body. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,626, filed May 23, 2011, Kristian Debus et al., Supersonic Cooling Nozzle Inlet. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/115,930, filed May 25, 2011, Tom Gielda, Supersonic Cooling with Pulsed Inlet and Bypass Loop. |
Combined search and examination report mailed Jan. 21, 2011 in U.K. patent application No. GB1021925.1. |
Fox, et al., “Supersonic Cooling by Shock-Vortex Interaction,” J. Fluid Mech. 1996, vol. 308, pp. 363-379. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/28761, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 19, 2011, 5pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Aug. 19, 2011 in Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/US2010/028761 filed Mar. 25, 2010. |
International Search Report mailed Jul. 25, 2011 in Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/US2011/027845 filed Mar. 10, 2011. |
“Nozzle Applet” Published by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) and retrieved on May 10, 2011 at http://www.engapplets.vt.edu/fluids/CDnozzle/cdinfo.html. |
Interview Summary mailed Mar. 16, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/960,979, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Final Office Action mailed May 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/960,979, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Interview Summary mailed Mar. 10, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,015, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Interview Summary mailed Mar. 18, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,342, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Final Office Action mailed May 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,342, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Interview Summary mailed Jul. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,342, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Final Office Action mailed May 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,341, filed Dec. 6, 2010. |
Hu, et al., “Numerical and Experimental Study of a Hydrodynamic Cavitation Tube,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, vol. 29B, Aug. 1998. |
Mishra, et al., “Development of Cavitation in Refrigerant (R-123) Flow Inside Rudimentary Microfluidic Systems,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 15, No. 5, Oct. 2006. |
Non-final office action mailed Feb. 4, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/960,979. |
Non-final office action mailed Feb. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,342. |
Non-final office action mailed Feb. 16, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110117511 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61240153 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12876985 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 12961386 | US |