The invention relates to a heavy-duty pivot plate adjusting joint having a single spring column arrangement for heavily loaded drawbars for connecting rail cars to multi-part car sections according to the preamble of claim 1. Heavy-duty adjusting joints with a single spring column arrangement at the ends of drawbars for coupling car units have already been disclosed.
DE 10246428.6 has already proposed a solution with a single spring column arrangement.
In this design, the pressure-side spring-plate-damping elements are mounted in support cages. A defined free distance “a” for suspension travel and pivoting travel is provided between the upper cage edge and the support bearing plate, said free distance “a” being completely used up at a defined swing out angle of the drawbar and when there are initial longitudinal pressure forces. After the cage edge and the support bearing plate touch, there is a rigid connection between the drawbar and car. The transmitting of the undamped longitudinal force has a negative effect when impacts occur and can lead to deformation and unsteady running of the car and the generation of noise.
Furthermore, DE 10 2005 034 527 has proposed a solution with a double spring column arrangement. This design ensures large restoring torques and an improved elastic connection with longitudinal pressure forces. However, in addition to its significant advantages it requires a disadvantageously large installation space which is not available in many cases and also entails a relatively high intrinsic mass and relative high costs.
The object of the invention is to provide a heavy-duty adjusting joint for heavily loaded drawbars which avoids the disadvantages of the known solutions and ensures, by virtue of an optimum action principle, better adjusting joint parameters with a relatively small installation space and a largely damped connection to the car when large longitudinal pressure forces occur. The intention is to reduce the intrinsic mass of the car sections and the manufacturing costs.
The object is achieved according to the invention by means of the features of claim 1. Advantageous additions to the invention can be found in the subclaims. The essential feature of the invention is that at each drawbar end just one end coupling rod is arranged in a space-saving fashion with a pressure-side spring column which its through-pressure force central by a movable pivoting washer which is arranged in front of or behind of the pressure-side spring washers depending on the requirements and enables, under the control of spring travel limiters by its pressure-side spring travel and a spring washer rolling surface, a long-lasting elastic junction with the underframe which is force-dependent and angle-dependent as a function of the deflection angle of the drawbar.
In this process it is possible to generate large balanced restoring torques between the drawbar and the car body as a function of the deflection angle of the drawbar and the initial longitudinal pressure force.
Further features of the invention are that, depending on the operating conditions and the definition of the object, two specific designs are provided as a normal case, for example, for the solution of the problem of providing protection against derailing when longitudinal pressure forces occur in goods cars in shunting mode or in passenger train cars in order to improve the anti-crash behavior in the event of accidents.
With the proposed “normal design”, the distance between the transmitting end tilting points is therefore made smaller than the distance between the spring travel limiters.
In the anti-crash design, in order to avoid horizontal and vertical veering out of the car bodies in the event of a crash the distance between the end tilting points is selected to be as large as possible in order to allow the largest possible restoring torque to act, wherein the distance between the transition end tilting points is larger than or equal to the distance between the spring travel limiters.
The above solution according to the invention makes a contribution to optimizing the adjusting joint principle with the result of a relative increase in power despite the minimal spatial requirement and with respect to a low intrinsic mass and lower costs of manufacture and maintenance. The safety level during operation with passenger train cars and lightweight goods car units is increased.
Exemplary embodiments in the invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to drawings.
In the drawings:
In order to support the pressure-side spring washer 6 of the spring column 5, a support-cage-like space 17 is formed by the spring travel limiters 10 in conjunction with the drawbar end plate 3 or the adjusting joint plate 9, or else the support bearing plate 4.
Pressure-side spring travel Fw is respectively available for the symmetrical and asymmetrical movement of the spring travel limiters 10, which secure and bound the optimum, horizontal and vertical deflection of the adjusting joint plates.
When the drawbar swings out, first an asymmetrical contact occurs with the corresponding plate on the swing-out side.
When the longitudinal pressure force LDK increases, the pivot plate 9 is then pressed back again into the support-cage-like space. The application of load to the adjusting joint pivot plate 9 occurs in each case via the longitudinal-pressure-transmitting point 13, which ends on all sides on the “transmitting end tilting point” 14 in the “normal design” solution. Here, the distance between the “transmitting end tilting points” 14=width dimension DKe is always smaller than the distance between the spring travel limiters 10. This ensures that even when there are large longitudinal pressure forces LDK the force profile over the restoring and tilting movement of the adjusting joint pivot plates 9 still very largely occurs elastically via the pressure-side spring washer. The maximum restoring torque which can be reached for the car body in the “normal design” is achieved here by the lever arm with the half dimension y=aNORM in the horizontal plane and in an analogous fashion in the vertical plane.
The combined anti-crash design corresponds to the normal design for goods cars with the exception of the arrangement of the spring travel limiters 10 and the embodiment of the adjusting joint pivot plate. In order to increase the anti-crash stabilization performance, a larger value is selected for the horizontal and vertical distance dimensions of the spring travel limiters 10. In this case, the distance between the transmitting end tilting points 15 becomes equal to or greater than the distance between the spring travel limiters 10. This permits the following structural principle according to
During normal operation with normal drawbar deflections (αNORM) corresponding approximately to a track radius of 250-300 m, the longitudinal-force-transmitting point 13 with its lever arm αNORM is located, according to
If a relatively large crash force acts, also paired with a relatively large deflection angle αOCRASH, the application of force occurs directly at the point 15 and therefore at the largest possible lever arm aCRASH according to
1 Underframe
2 Drawbar
3 Drawbar end plate
4 Support bearing plate
5 Spring column
6 Pressure-side spring washer
7 Tension-side spring washer
8 End coupling rod part
9 Adjusting joint pivot plate
10 Spring travel limiter
11 Pressure contact faces
12 Pivot plate rolling face
13 Longitudinal-force-transmitting point
14 Transmitting end tilting point normal design
15 Transmitting end tilting point anti-crash design
16 Pressure-force-transmitting contact face
17 Support-cage-like space
18 Longitudinal axis of the drawbar
LDK Longitudinal pressure force
RH Horizontal adjusting joint radius
RV Vertical adjusting joint radius
Fw Pressure-side spring travel
Dah Width dimension across the spring travel limiters 10
Dav Height dimension across the spring travel limiters 10
Dke Width dimension across the transmitting end tilting
y Distance—center of adjusting joint to transmitting end tilting point 15
S Protruding distance
αoNORM Drawbar deflection angle in normal position
αoCRASH Drawbar deflection angle in crash position
aNORM Maximum lever arm of the restoring joint in “normal design”
aCRASH Maximum lever arm of the restoring joint in “crash design”
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 030 284.8 | Jun 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/057022 | 6/8/2009 | WO | 00 | 12/30/2010 |