Shingle technology has advanced greatly over the past few decades. Roof shingles and roll roofing provide protection for houses and buildings to prevent leakage of rain water into the interior of the building. Various types of materials have been used to make shingles including asphalt and other materials. In addition, waterproofing materials have protected foundations and other surfaces from water penetration. As used herein, “roofing materials” includes roof shingles, roll roofing and waterproofing materials, even if such waterproofing materials are used on foundations and other places.
An embodiment of the present invention may therefore comprise impact resistant roofing comprising: a heavy fiberglass mat having a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf; a first asphalt layer disposed on a top portion of the heavy glass mat substrate; a second asphalt layer disposed on a bottom surface of the heavy fiberglass mat substrate.
An embodiment of the present invention may further comprise a method of manufacturing impact resistant roofing comprising: providing a heavy fiberglass mat substrate having a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf; placing a first asphalt layer over a top surface of the heavy fiberglass mat substrate; placing a second asphalt layer on a bottom surface of the heavy fiberglass mat substrate.
The Underwriters Laboratory has a standard for impact resistance testing that is identified as UL 2218. The test provides impact resistance data for the valuation of prepared roof covering materials such as shingles. The test evaluates the impact from a steel ball from locations on the roofing material selected to be most vulnerable, such as corners, unsupported sections, and joints. The test method does not evaluate the effects of weathering, temperature, aging or similar effects on impact resistance. The impact energy used in the standard is derived from impact energy of actual hailstones. However, there is no currently established direct correlation between the performance of roof covering materials when impacted by hailstones versus steel balls, as used in UL 2218. Consequently, the test method does not provide a direct basis to compare expected performance under all hail conditions, but does provide a basis for comparison of the response of roof covering when subjected to the impact energies described.
There are classes of impact resistance running from Class I to Class IV. Class IV roofing has the highest impact resistance. Class IV impact resistance is tested by dropping 2-inch steel balls onto the roofing material from a height of twenty feet, so that the steel balls impact the roofing material in the various locations. If the roofing material can withstand the impacts from the steel balls and not produce cracks, punctures, tears, splits or ruptures, or otherwise separate the fibers of the fiberglass mat, the shingle passes the class IV impact testing. Tests were performed by Underwrites Laboratory on a sample shingle having a mat weight of 3.2 lbs/cfs. This shingle was made in the TAMKO Joplin plant by TAMKO Building Products, Inc. The test was performed to rate the shingles for Class IV pursuant to Underwriters Laboratory Test Standard 2218, i.e., UL 2218. The 2-inch steel balls were dropped from 20 feet on various portions of the shingle.
On the first course, the ball was dropped over a center support on a double layer of the shingle. On the second course, the ball was dropped over the center support on a single layer of the shingle. On the third course, the ball was dropped over the left side on the edge of a double layer. On the fourth course, the ball was dropped over the left side above the edge of a single layer. On the fifth course, the ball was dropped on the right side on the head lap of a double layer. On the sixth course, the ball was dropped on the right side on the head lap of a single layer. On the first course, there was a depression of 0.06 inches. On the second course, there was a depression of 0.09 inches. On the third course, there was a depression of 0.04 inches. On the fourth course, there was a depression of 0.06 inches. On the fifth course, there was a depression of 0.04 inches, and on the sixth course, there was a depression of 0.07 inches. No damage was detected for this test. This shingle, therefore, passed the Class IV UL 2218 standard. There was no evidence of tearing, fracturing, cracking, splitting, rupture, crazing, or other evidence of opening of the roof covering layer. A second test was run with a similar result and the second shingle also passed the Class IV UL 2218 standard.
In accordance with the present invention, it has been determined that by increasing the weight and thickness of the fiberglass mat substrate to at least 3.0 lbs/cfs, a substantially equal amount of impact resistance can be achieved as using additional layers of film or supporting materials, while avoiding the additional cost and complexity of using separate fiberglass layers or layers of other materials attached to a back surface of the roofing. In this manner, impact resistant roofing, especially impact resistant roofing that can pass the UL 2218, Class IV impact test, can be achieved at a fraction of the cost and complexity of other techniques of manufacturing an impact resistant shingle. The heavy glass mat 102 is sufficient to absorb the shock forces of the various impacts and cause those forces to be spread over the surface of the heavy glass mat 102 to lessen the forces in any single location. The heavy glass mat 102 has a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf and preferably 3.2 lbs/csf, to routinely pass the class IV impact test.
Consequently, an impact resistant roofing can be constructed by utilizing a heavy glass mat 102 that has a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf so that the impact resistant roofing passes the UA 2218, Class IV impact test. In this manner, impact resistant roofing can be manufactured in a simple and easy fashion without the complexities of additional fiberglass or other impact resistant layers in the shingle, and at a fraction of the cost of more complex techniques of creating impact resistant roofing. Further, most existing roofing manufacturing lines can be utilized, without modification, to create a UL 2218, Class IV impact resistant roofing.
This Non-Provisional patent application claims the benefit of the Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 62/653,691, entitled “Heavy Glass Mat Impact Resistant Roofing,” which was filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office on Apr. 6, 2018, which is specifically incorporated herein by reference for all that it discloses and teaches.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4287248 | Gessner et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4804696 | Jolitz et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5026747 | Jolitz et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5102436 | Grabowski | Apr 1992 | A |
5571596 | Johnson | Nov 1996 | A |
6207593 | Fields | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228785 | Miller et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6341462 | Kiik et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6426309 | Miller et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6709994 | Miller et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7442658 | Rodrigues et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7670668 | Greaves et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7836654 | Belt et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8226790 | Rodriques et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231443 | Tomcak et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8240102 | Belt et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8623164 | Belt et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8802215 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9010058 | DeJarnette et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021760 | Kiik et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9242432 | Harrington, Jr. et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9259860 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9404263 | Kiik et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9441140 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9447581 | Harrington et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9605434 | Belt et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9909317 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20070207690 | Huddy | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080160188 | Teng | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100151198 | Khan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110189433 | Kiik | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130025225 | Vermilion et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140272244 | Harrington, Jr. et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150218823 | Shiao et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150240494 | Kiik et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150259919 | Lewis | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150259920 | Hassan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170067257 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170158440 | Belt et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170197379 | Teng | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
108457429 | Aug 2018 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Church Mutual Insurance Company “Roofing Product Comparisons” Sep. 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190309518 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62653691 | Apr 2018 | US |