Heavy glass mat impact resistant roofing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10982446
  • Patent Number
    10,982,446
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 29, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 20, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Inventors
    • Swayne; Matthew (Sarcoxie, MO, US)
    • Hance; Jason (Joplin, MO, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Stephan; Beth A
    Agents
    • Cochran Freund & Young LLC
    • Cochran; William W.
Abstract
Disclosed is impact resistant roofing that utilizes a heavy glass mat substrate having a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf that meets high impact resistance roofing standards. The impact resistant roofing utilizes a heavy glass mat that is embedded between two layers of asphalt. The impact resistant roofing can be manufactured on standard, existing roofing lines without modification.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Shingle technology has advanced greatly over the past few decades. Roof shingles and roll roofing provide protection for houses and buildings to prevent leakage of rain water into the interior of the building. Various types of materials have been used to make shingles including asphalt and other materials. In addition, waterproofing materials have protected foundations and other surfaces from water penetration. As used herein, “roofing materials” includes roof shingles, roll roofing and waterproofing materials, even if such waterproofing materials are used on foundations and other places.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An embodiment of the present invention may therefore comprise impact resistant roofing comprising: a heavy fiberglass mat having a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf; a first asphalt layer disposed on a top portion of the heavy glass mat substrate; a second asphalt layer disposed on a bottom surface of the heavy fiberglass mat substrate.


An embodiment of the present invention may further comprise a method of manufacturing impact resistant roofing comprising: providing a heavy fiberglass mat substrate having a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf; placing a first asphalt layer over a top surface of the heavy fiberglass mat substrate; placing a second asphalt layer on a bottom surface of the heavy fiberglass mat substrate.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an impact resistant roofing.



FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of an embodiment of a portion of a manufacturing line for manufacturing the embodiment of the impact resistant roofing illustrated in FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an embodiment of an impact resistant rooting 100. As illustrated in FIG. 1, a heavy glass mat 102 is surrounded by asphalt layer 104 on a top surface, and an asphalt layer 106 on a bottom surface. Impact resistant roofing, especially the impact resistant shingles that meet the Underwriters Laboratory Standard UL 2218, Class IV impact requirements, have been constructed in various ways. For example, many manufacturers utilize a glass mat substrate and an additional glass mat, scrim or layer of polymer or other material that is located on the back or bottom surface of the roofing material. A second glass mat, scrim or layer of polymer is attached to the bottom surface an asphalt layer 106 in prior art roofing. As such, additional structural rigidity is provided to the shingle that resists impacts, Other techniques for providing impact resistance include adding certain polymers, oils and waxes to the asphalt material to soften the asphalt material so that the shock forces from impacts are absorbed more easily by the asphalt, since the asphalt is made less brittle. These techniques for manufacturing roofing, and other techniques for meeting the UL 2218, Class IV impact resistant test, are expensive and add complexity to the manufacturing line for the impact resistant roofing. The complexity and additional cost of adding an additional fiberglass layer or other layer can greatly increase the cost of impact resistant roofing material.


The Underwriters Laboratory has a standard for impact resistance testing that is identified as UL 2218. The test provides impact resistance data for the valuation of prepared roof covering materials such as shingles. The test evaluates the impact from a steel ball from locations on the roofing material selected to be most vulnerable, such as corners, unsupported sections, and joints. The test method does not evaluate the effects of weathering, temperature, aging or similar effects on impact resistance. The impact energy used in the standard is derived from impact energy of actual hailstones. However, there is no currently established direct correlation between the performance of roof covering materials when impacted by hailstones versus steel balls, as used in UL 2218. Consequently, the test method does not provide a direct basis to compare expected performance under all hail conditions, but does provide a basis for comparison of the response of roof covering when subjected to the impact energies described.


There are classes of impact resistance running from Class I to Class IV. Class IV roofing has the highest impact resistance. Class IV impact resistance is tested by dropping 2-inch steel balls onto the roofing material from a height of twenty feet, so that the steel balls impact the roofing material in the various locations. If the roofing material can withstand the impacts from the steel balls and not produce cracks, punctures, tears, splits or ruptures, or otherwise separate the fibers of the fiberglass mat, the shingle passes the class IV impact testing. Tests were performed by Underwrites Laboratory on a sample shingle having a mat weight of 3.2 lbs/cfs. This shingle was made in the TAMKO Joplin plant by TAMKO Building Products, Inc. The test was performed to rate the shingles for Class IV pursuant to Underwriters Laboratory Test Standard 2218, i.e., UL 2218. The 2-inch steel balls were dropped from 20 feet on various portions of the shingle.


On the first course, the ball was dropped over a center support on a double layer of the shingle. On the second course, the ball was dropped over the center support on a single layer of the shingle. On the third course, the ball was dropped over the left side on the edge of a double layer. On the fourth course, the ball was dropped over the left side above the edge of a single layer. On the fifth course, the ball was dropped on the right side on the head lap of a double layer. On the sixth course, the ball was dropped on the right side on the head lap of a single layer. On the first course, there was a depression of 0.06 inches. On the second course, there was a depression of 0.09 inches. On the third course, there was a depression of 0.04 inches. On the fourth course, there was a depression of 0.06 inches. On the fifth course, there was a depression of 0.04 inches, and on the sixth course, there was a depression of 0.07 inches. No damage was detected for this test. This shingle, therefore, passed the Class IV UL 2218 standard. There was no evidence of tearing, fracturing, cracking, splitting, rupture, crazing, or other evidence of opening of the roof covering layer. A second test was run with a similar result and the second shingle also passed the Class IV UL 2218 standard.


In accordance with the present invention, it has been determined that by increasing the weight and thickness of the fiberglass mat substrate to at least 3.0 lbs/cfs, a substantially equal amount of impact resistance can be achieved as using additional layers of film or supporting materials, while avoiding the additional cost and complexity of using separate fiberglass layers or layers of other materials attached to a back surface of the roofing. In this manner, impact resistant roofing, especially impact resistant roofing that can pass the UL 2218, Class IV impact test, can be achieved at a fraction of the cost and complexity of other techniques of manufacturing an impact resistant shingle. The heavy glass mat 102 is sufficient to absorb the shock forces of the various impacts and cause those forces to be spread over the surface of the heavy glass mat 102 to lessen the forces in any single location. The heavy glass mat 102 has a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf and preferably 3.2 lbs/csf, to routinely pass the class IV impact test.



FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of an embodiment of a portion of the manufacturing line 200 for constructing the embodiment of the impact resistant roofing illustrated in FIG. 1. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the feed roll 202 supplies the heavy glass mat 102 that has a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf. The heavy glass mat 102 is fed through a dry looper 204 that is used as a buffer to absorb any slow down or stoppage in the feed roll 202. The heavy glass mat 102 is then fed to an asphalt top coater 206, which applies the asphalt layer 104 (FIG. 1) to the top surface of the heavy glass mat 102. The heavy glass mat 102 then proceeds to an asphalt bottom coater 208, which applies the bottom asphalt layer 106 (FIG. 1) to the heavy glass mat 102. Once the top asphalt layer 104 and bottom asphalt layer 106 are applied to the heavy glass mat 102, the composite then proceeds to the remaining portion of the manufacturing line 200.


Consequently, an impact resistant roofing can be constructed by utilizing a heavy glass mat 102 that has a weight of at least 3.0 lbs/csf so that the impact resistant roofing passes the UA 2218, Class IV impact test. In this manner, impact resistant roofing can be manufactured in a simple and easy fashion without the complexities of additional fiberglass or other impact resistant layers in the shingle, and at a fraction of the cost of more complex techniques of creating impact resistant roofing. Further, most existing roofing manufacturing lines can be utilized, without modification, to create a UL 2218, Class IV impact resistant roofing.

Claims
  • 1. Impact resistant roofing comprising: a single fiberglass mat substrate having a weight of 3.2 lbs/csf;a first asphalt layer disposed on a top portion of said single fiberglass mat substrate;a second asphalt layer disposed on a bottom surface of said single fiberglass mat substrate;wherein said impact resistant roofing exhibits impact resistance when a 2-inch steel ball is dropped from 20 feet onto said impact resistant roofing.
  • 2. A method of manufacturing impact resistant roofing comprising: providing a single fiberglass mat substrate having a weight of 3.2 lbs/csf;placing a first asphalt layer over a top surface of said single fiberglass mat substrate;placing a second asphalt layer on a bottom surface of said single fiberglass mat substrate;wherein said impact resistant roofing exhibits impact resistance when a 2-inch steel ball is dropped from 20 feet onto said impact resistant roofing.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This Non-Provisional patent application claims the benefit of the Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 62/653,691, entitled “Heavy Glass Mat Impact Resistant Roofing,” which was filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office on Apr. 6, 2018, which is specifically incorporated herein by reference for all that it discloses and teaches.

US Referenced Citations (40)
Number Name Date Kind
4287248 Gessner et al. Sep 1981 A
4804696 Jolitz et al. Feb 1989 A
5026747 Jolitz et al. Jun 1991 A
5102436 Grabowski Apr 1992 A
5571596 Johnson Nov 1996 A
6207593 Fields Mar 2001 B1
6228785 Miller et al. May 2001 B1
6341462 Kiik et al. Jan 2002 B2
6426309 Miller et al. Jul 2002 B1
6709994 Miller et al. Mar 2004 B2
7442658 Rodrigues et al. Oct 2008 B2
7670668 Greaves et al. Mar 2010 B2
7836654 Belt et al. Nov 2010 B2
8226790 Rodriques et al. Jul 2012 B2
8231443 Tomcak et al. Jul 2012 B1
8240102 Belt et al. Aug 2012 B2
8623164 Belt et al. Jan 2014 B2
8802215 Kalkanoglu et al. Aug 2014 B2
9010058 DeJarnette et al. Apr 2015 B2
9021760 Kiik et al. May 2015 B2
9242432 Harrington, Jr. et al. Jan 2016 B1
9259860 Kalkanoglu et al. Feb 2016 B2
9404263 Kiik et al. Aug 2016 B2
9441140 Zhou et al. Sep 2016 B2
9447581 Harrington et al. Sep 2016 B2
9605434 Belt et al. Mar 2017 B2
9909317 Johnson et al. Mar 2018 B2
20070207690 Huddy Sep 2007 A1
20080160188 Teng Jul 2008 A1
20100151198 Khan Jun 2010 A1
20110189433 Kiik Aug 2011 A1
20130025225 Vermilion et al. Jan 2013 A1
20140272244 Harrington, Jr. et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150218823 Shiao et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150240494 Kiik et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150259919 Lewis Sep 2015 A1
20150259920 Hassan Sep 2015 A1
20170067257 Zhou et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170158440 Belt et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170197379 Teng Jul 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
108457429 Aug 2018 CN
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Church Mutual Insurance Company “Roofing Product Comparisons” Sep. 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190309518 A1 Oct 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62653691 Apr 2018 US