This disclosure relates to reduction in exhaust particulate emissions from a locomotive diesel engine, and specifically to a heavy particle oil separator splash shield.
The present disclosure relates to reduction in exhaust particulate emissions from a locomotive diesel engine, and specifically to a heavy particle oil separator splash shield.
Oil separators are designed to trap and recover small oil droplets and particulate matter from vapors emitted from engines. Specifically, the crankcase ventilation oil separator is used to prevent the build-up of combustible gases in the crankcase, by collecting oil and particulate matter from vapors.
Cam shaft drive gears and counterweights are generally located in close proximity to the passage leading to the oil separator. The cam shaft drive gears are lubricated through a system of oil passages within the crankcase and manifolds which mount or connect to the mounting shafts for the gears. Oil passing through the gears is splashed around and on to the gears to create the necessary lubrication between the mating gear teeth. This splashing causes heavy particle liquid oil droplets to enter directly into the passage to the oil separator from the crankcase. The purpose of the oil separator is to collect oil and particulate matter from vapors that pass through its element. Therefore, additional oil splashed into the separator from the cam shaft drive gears decreases the efficiency of the element of the oil separator, thus allowing more particulate matter to be released into the atmosphere.
Thus, it is an object of the present disclosure to provide a shield between the moving parts of the engine (including the cam shaft drive gears) and the oil separator filter to prevent heavy particulate oil droplets from saturating the oil separator. Specifically, the present shield minimizes heavy particle oil droplets in close proximity to the oil separator from entering the filter, thus preventing saturation of the oil separator element and increasing the efficiency of the oil separator. As a result, environmental pollution is reduced.
The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the disclosure and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. For instance, although described in the context of a two-stroke diesel engine, the present device may be employed in any diesel engine. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the broadest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
The present disclosure generally relates to a locomotive diesel engine and, more particularly, to a heavy particle oil separator splash shield. Specifically, provided is a system and method for reducing exhaust particulate emissions. The present shield minimizes heavy particle oil droplets from the cam shaft drive gears from entering the oil separator. As a result, the present shield minimizes saturation of the oil separator, thereby increasing the efficiency of the oil separator and reducing environmental pollution.
a is a side perspective view of the mounting location of the present splash shield of
b is a side view of the mounting location of the present splash shield of
c is another side perspective view of the mounting location of the present splash shield of
d is a detailed front side view of the mounting location of the present splash shield of
The present disclosure relates to reduction in exhaust particulate emissions from a locomotive diesel engine, and specifically to a heavy particle oil separator splash shield. The oil splash shield reduces the amount of heavy particle oil splashed from a cam shaft drive gear into the oil separator, thereby reducing engine exhaust particulate matter emissions. Specifically, a splash shield is positioned between the moving parts of the engine (including a cam shaft drive gear) and the oil separator to prevent direct path flow of heavy droplets into the oil separator such that excess oil does not saturate the element of the oil separator.
The engine 106 is divided into two distinct pressure zones: positive pressure 151 (above atmospheric pressure) and negative pressure 153 (below atmospheric pressure). The positive pressure zone 151 of a diesel engine 106 is illustrated in
The oil separator 122 is generally configured to trap and recover small oil droplets and particulate matter carried out through vapors from the crankcase. Specifically, the crankcase ventilation oil separator 122 is used to prevent the build-up of combustible gases in the crankcase 114, by collecting oil and particulate matter from the vapors that flow through it. As shown in
As described above, and further illustrated in
In the present system, an oil splash shield 101 is provided from minimizing transfer of heavy oil droplets from the cam shaft drive gears 117 to the oil separator 122 of the locomotive diesel engine (e.g., as shown in
In one embodiment, as shown in
Moreover, the member 131 is situated in relation to the moving parts of the engine (e.g., the cam shaft drive gears 117) such that it prevents flow of heavy particle oil droplets into the oil separator. Specifically, the member 131 is situated in the passageway between the crankcase 114 and oil separator 122 such that the shield 101 deflects splashing heavy oil droplets from the cam shaft drive gears 117 away from the oil separator 122. The member 131 is positioned such that it is set away from (that is, not flush with) the opening 113 of the mounting flange 111 leading to the oil separator 122. As a result, there is a clearance defined between the opening 113 of the mounting flange 111 and the shield 101. This clearance is sized and shaped such that vapor flow is maintained from the crankcase 114 to the oil separator 122 such that the efficiency of the oil separator 122 is not compromised by the presence of the shield 101. Thus, the member 131 prevents heavy particle oil droplets from saturating the element, while the larger aperture allows vapor to enter the oil separator 122. Because the oil separator 122 element is not oversaturated with extraneous heavy particle oil droplets from the cam shaft drive gear 117, it is able to more efficiently separate oil from the passing vapor. As a result, particulate emissions are reduced.
Additionally, the shield 101 may further include a plurality of support members 123 for maintaining the rigidity of the shield 101. In the embodiment shown in
In applications that cause back pressure in the exhaust system, such as exhaust silencers or extended exhaust piping runs, an air ejector system is used to increase crankcase vacuum. In this system, pressurized air from the left bank aftercooler duct is piped to the ejector, where it blows through a venturi, adding to the suction created by the eductor tube. Different size ejector nozzles may be used to aid in maintaining proper crankcase suction levels. To increase crankcase suction, a large diameter nozzle is applied, after the engine is inspected for other causes of low vacuum. Oil droplets and particulate matter collect in the oil separator, and drain back to the crankcase, while the vapors discharge, generally free of oil and particulate matter, into the exhaust and are vented to the atmosphere.
The present disclosure has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, and one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments, and any variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a Nonprovisional Patent Application, which claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/365,894 entitled “Heavy Particle Oil Separator Splash Shield,” filed Jul. 20, 2010, the complete disclosure thereof being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4272371 | Moses et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4597372 | Furukawa | Jul 1986 | A |
4656991 | Fukuo et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
6152119 | Hoshiba et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6199543 | Bedkowski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6647973 | Schueler et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6694957 | Schueler et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20040255919 | Bedkowski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050188944 | Mahakul et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050189663 | Dollie et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20110283967 | DeVos et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120006306 | Boehm et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120017866 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61365894 | Jul 2010 | US |