Field
The present disclosure relates generally to helical piles, and more particularly to leads and extensions for helical piles having perimeter shear helical plates.
Description of the Related Art
Piles are used to support structures, such as buildings, when the soil underlying the structure would be too weak alone to support the structure. To effectively support a structure, a pile has to penetrate the soil to a depth where competent load-bearing stratum is found. Conventional piles can be cast in place by excavating a hole in the place where the pile is needed, or a hollow form can be driven into the ground where the pile is needed, and then filled with cement. These approaches are cumbersome and expensive.
Helical or screw piles are a cost-effective alternative to conventional cement piles because of the speed and ease at which a helical pile can be installed. Helical piles are rotated such that load bearing helical plates at the lower end of the pile effectively screw the pile into the soil to a desired depth. Referring to
One drawback of conventional helical piles is that they have a limited load capacity that if exceeded can cause the helical pile to settle or creep. Another drawback of conventional helical piles is that they can succumb to lateral movement. Greater pile stability and stiffness can be achieved by pouring or pumping cement based grout around the pile shaft which hardens to form a grout column. However, adding grout columns increase construction costs from a time and materials point of view. Further, there may be instances where soil conditions or other environmental conditions do not permit the use of grout columns to increase the stability, stiffness, and load capacity of the pile. The present disclosure provides an alternative to using grout columns to increase the stability, stiffness and load capacity of helical piles.
The present disclosure provides helical piles having helical pile leads and/or extensions with closely spaced perimeter shear helical plates that develop a cylindrical failure surface between the perimeter shear helical plates and soil, mobilizing soil-to-soil shear strength, and thus increasing the stability, stiffness and load capacity of the helical pile. In one embodiment, the helical pile extension includes a shaft having an end portion configured to connect to another helical pile extension or a helical pile lead, and a head portion configured to connect to another helical pile extension. A plurality of perimeter shear helical plates are attached to the shaft, and spaced apart a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength. An example of a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength is less than 3 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates and preferably 1.5 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates. The extension shafts may be square or round and they may be solid or hollow. The diameter of each of the plurality of perimeter shear helical plates can range from between about 4 inches and about 10 inches.
In one embodiment, the helical pile lead includes a shaft having an end portion and a head portion, where the head portion is configured to connect to a helical pile extension. At least one load bearing helical plate is attached at the end portion of the shaft, and a plurality of perimeter shear helical plates are attached to the shaft. The perimeter shear helical plates on the shaft are preferably spaced apart a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength. Preferably, the perimeter shear helical plate closest to the at least one load bearing plate is spaced from the at least one load bearing helical plate a distance that promotes the individual load bearing capacity of the at least one load bearing helical plate. An example of a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength is less than 3 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates, and preferably 1.5 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates. An example of a distance that promotes the individual load bearing capacity of the at least one load bearing helical plate is at least 6 inches. The diameter of each of the plurality of perimeter shear helical plates can range between about 4 inches and 10 inches, and the diameter of the at least one load bearing helical plate can range between 12 inches and 16 inches.
In one embodiment, a helical pile according to the present disclosure may include a lead having a lead shaft with an end portion, a head portion configured to connect to an extension, and at least one load bearing helical plate attached at the end portion of the lead shaft. The helical pile also includes an extension having an extension shaft with an end portion that is configured to connect to the head portion of the lead. The extension also has a head portion, and a plurality of perimeter shear helical plates attached to the extension shaft. The perimeter shear helical plates on the extension shaft are preferably spaced apart a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength, and the perimeter shear helical plate on the extension shaft closest to the lead is spaced from the at least one load bearing helical plate a distance that promotes the individual load bearing capacity of the at least one load bearing helical plate. An example of a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength is less than 3 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates and preferably 1.5 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates. An example of a distance that promotes the individual load bearing capacity of the at least one load bearing helical plate is at least 6 inches. Preferably, the diameter of each of the plurality of perimeter shear helical plates ranges from between 4 inches and 10 inches, and the diameter of the at least one load bearing helical plate ranges from between 12 inches and 16 inches.
In another embodiment, a helical pile according to the present disclosure may include a lead having a lead shaft with an end portion, and a head portion configured to connect to an extension, at least one load bearing helical plate attached at the end portion of the lead shaft, and a plurality of perimeter shear helical plates attached to the shaft. The perimeter shear helical plates on the lead shaft are preferably spaced apart a distance that promotes soil-to-soil shear strength, and the perimeter shear helical plate closest to the at least one load bearing plate is preferably spaced from the at least one load bearing helical plate a distance that promotes the individual load bearing capacity of the at least one load bearing helical plate. The helical pile according to this embodiment also includes an extension having an extension shaft with an end portion configured to connect to the head portion of the lead, and a head portion.
The figures depict embodiments for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following description that alternative embodiments of the structures illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles described herein, wherein:
The present disclosure provides helical leads and extensions with closely spaced perimeter shear helical plates capable of developing a cylindrical failure surface between the perimeter shear helical plates and soil to mobilize soil-to-soil shear strength. The helical leads and extensions disclosed herein can be used as helical piles or anchors, and are capable of withstanding compression loads and tension loads. Reference herein to helical lead, helical extension, and helical piles also includes helical anchors.
Referring to
In the lead end portion 104 is one or more load bearing helical plates 108 that when rotated screw the pile into the soil with minimal disruption to the surrounding soil. The load bearing helical plates 108 on the lead may have the same diameter, or the load bearing helical plates 108 may have different diameters that are in a tapered arrangement. For example, the tapered arrangement may be such that the smallest diameter load bearing helical plate is closest to the lead tip 106 and the largest load bearing helical plate is at a distance away from the lead tip. If multiple load bearing helical plates are employed, the load bearing helical plates on the lead would be spaced apart at a distance “A” sufficient to promote individual plate load bearing capacity, as described above. In the embodiment of
The lead 100 in this embodiment has a plurality of spaced apart perimeter shear helical plates 110 arranged along the length of the lead shaft 101, as shown. The perimeter shear helical plates are typically welded to the shaft 101, but the perimeter shear helical plates may be secured to the shaft using any other suitable method. The lowest perimeter shear helical plate 110a on lead shaft 101 is positioned on the lead shaft at a distance “C” from the load bearing helical plate 108. The distance “C” is sufficient to promote the individual plate load bearing capacity of plate 108, which is typically 1½ feet to 2 feet. Each perimeter shear helical plate 110 can have the same diameter, or different diameters in a tapered arrangement. In the embodiment shown in
Referring again to
Referring to
The extension 200 has a plurality of spaced apart perimeter shear helical plates 206 arranged along the length of the extension shaft 201, as shown. The perimeter shear helical plates are typically welded to the shaft 201, but the perimeter shear helical plates may be secured to the shaft using any other suitable method. The perimeter shear helical plates 206 are substantially similar to perimeter shear helical plates 110 on the lead 100 and shown in more detail in
The perimeter shear helical plates 206 are spaced apart along the shaft 201 at a distance “B” sufficient to promote soil-to-soil shear strength. Preferably, the distance “B” is less than 3 times a diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates 110, and preferably equal to 1.5 times the diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates 206. For example, if the perimeter shear helical plates were 8 inches in diameter and using a distance “B” that is 1.5 times the diameter of the perimeter shear helical plates, the spacing between the perimeter shear helical plates 206 along the shaft 201 would be less than or equal to 12 inches. By closely spacing the perimeter shear helical plates 206 at the distance “B” a cylindrical failure surface between the perimeter shear helical plates 206 and soil develops as the helical pile is rotated into the soil mobilizing soil-to-soil shear strength, and thus increasing the stability, stiffness and load capacity of the helical pile.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Other embodiments of the helical pile according to the present disclosure may include a plurality of extensions 200 connected in series to lead 12 or lead 100, or the helical pile may include one or more extensions 200 with one or more extensions 20 connected to the lead 12 or lead 100 in various combinations and arrangements. For example, an alternating arrangement may be employed where an extension 200 is connected to a lead 100 or 12, and then an extension 20 is connected to the extension 200, and then an extension 200 is connected to the extension 20, and so on. As another example, an alternating arrangement may be employed where an extension 20 is connected to a lead 100 or 12, and then an extension 200 is connected to the extension 20, and then an extension 20 is connected to the extension 200, and so on.
Helical piles are installed by applying torque to the shaft at the lead head portion that causes the load bearing helical plates to rotate and screw into the soil with minimal disruption to the surrounding soil. As the lead penetrates the soil, one or more extensions may have to be added to the pile so that the pile can achieve the desired depth.
The helical piles, leads and extensions using the perimeter shear helical plates as described herein provide solutions to develop a cylindrical failure surface between the perimeter shear helical plates and soil as the helical pile is rotated into the soil mobilizing soil-to-soil shear strength, and thus increasing the stability, stiffness and load capacity of the helical piles. The particular configuration of piles, leads and extensions used as well as the diameters of the load bearing helical plates and the perimeter shear helical plates will depend upon the load the piles are to bear, and the soil conditions. However, it will be understood that various modifications can be made to the embodiments of the present disclosure herein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting the disclosure, but merely as embodiments thereof. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
88891 | McMahen | Apr 1869 | A |
5575593 | Raaf | Nov 1996 | A |
5707180 | Vickars | Jan 1998 | A |
6058662 | Perko | May 2000 | A |
6722821 | Perko et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7441471 | Davis | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7510350 | Ronnkvist | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7635240 | Gantt | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8240957 | Watson, III | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8506207 | Lutenegger et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8631627 | Atchley | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8777521 | Nagata | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8845236 | Dosdourian | Sep 2014 | B1 |
20030041535 | Rupiper | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050074298 | Jones | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20120009022 | Meline | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037261 | Nagata | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140286712 | Lutenegger et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Stanier et al.; Modelling helical screw piles in soft clay and design implications; Jul. 2013; All pages (Year: 2013). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration mailed in PCT/US2015/062083 dated Feb. 5, 2016. |
Lutennegger; Cylindrical Shear or Plate Bearing?—Uplift Behavior of Multi-Helix Screw Anchors in Clay; Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering,University of Massachusetts, 8 pages. |
Lutenegger; Behavior of Multi-Helix Screw Anchors in Sand, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, 2011 Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference, 6 pages. |
Merifield; Ultimate Lift Capacity of Multiplate Helical Anchors in Clay; Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Jul. 2011, 13 pages. |
Rao et. al.; Uplift Capacity of Screw Pile Anchors; Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 20, 1989, 21 pages. |
Stephenson; Helical Foundations and Tie Backs, Civil Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Rolla, Jun. 26, 1997, 34 pages. |
Zhang et. al.; Screw Pile Test Program (Part 1): Instrumentation, Site Characterization and Installation; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB; 51st Canadian Geotechnical Conference, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160145824 A1 | May 2016 | US |