Not applicable.
The present invention relates to ion accelerators in general and to helical ion accelerators in particular. Accelerators of ions have many practical uses in addition to basic research which vary from ion implantation, such as used to form semiconductors or coatings, to neutron radiography used to detect explosives and nuclear materials in luggage and shipping containers. The development of the helical ion accelerator, also called a pulse line ion accelerator, was motivated by the desire for a less expensive way to accelerate intense short pulse heavy ion beams to regimes of interest for studies of high energy density physics and warm dense matter. In helical ion accelerators a pulse power driver applied at one end of a helical pulse line creates a traveling wave pulse that accelerates and axially confines a heavy ion beam pulse. Richard Briggs described acceleration scenarios with constant parameter helical lines which result in output energies of a single stage much larger than the several hundred kilovolt peak voltages on the line. The concept can be described as an “air core” coax line where a pulse is injected into a central helical core so that an accelerating voltage pulse moves along with the ions to get voltage multiplication.
The Helical Resonator Ion Accelerator of this invention comprises an ion source preferably of deuteron ions arranged to inject ions into a hollow dielectric pipe forming a vacuum chamber. The hollow pipe defines an axis along which particles are accelerated. The hollow pipe is wrapped with a coil, defining a proximal end and a distal end, and the coil is placed inside a metal outer pipe. The dielectric pipe, the coil and the metal pipe are arranged coaxially to an axis of the accelerator substantially along which particles are accelerated. A material with a high electrical breakdown voltage such as dielectric oil or sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) at one to several atmospheres of pressure fills a void formed between the coil and the outer metal pipe. The outer metal pipe is positioned within the high intensity (e.g. 0.5-3.0 Tesla) solenoid magnetic field such as produced by a superconducting solenoid, to provide continuous axial focusing of the deuteron beam. A pulse generator is coupled to the proximal end of the coil, to generate a voltage wave form pulse which is coupled to the coil. The pulse then travels down the axis of the accelerator on the coil (not traveling directly on the wire but axially on the helix formed by the coil). The voltage pulse has a voltage on the order of 100-300 kV. The coupling of the pulse generator may use a resistive column to match impedance of the coil, or use an inductive couple of one or a few turns so that a high current pulse in the inductive coil induces a high-voltage pulse in the coil. A third and perhaps most economical approach is to charge the outer pipe relative to the coil to a voltage on the order of 100-300 kV, and create the drive pulse by shorting the outer metal pipe to the coil at the proximal end of the coil.
In order to prevent the injected voltage waveform reflecting from the distal end of the coil, the coil is grounded to a matching resistive network/column. In the case where the high-voltage pulse is injected using impedance matching resistance network, the output of the coil through a further matching resistive network/column can be conducted to a directional coupler allowing use of a waveform generator to output a waveform which adds to the output of the coil which can be recirculated to the proximal end of the coil and reinjected into the coil through the resistive network/column.
Ion injection is, for example, a Helicon type plasma injector and ion source which injects deuteron ions along the axis of the vacuum chamber formed by the hollow dielectric pipe.
In order to achieve maximum acceleration of any ion it is necessary that the velocity of the electric field accelerate as it moves along the axis of the accelerator, otherwise the ions will have a constant velocity. Traveling wave velocity can be accelerated by tapering the characteristic velocity of the accelerator in the direction of wave propagation (i.e., increasing the velocity per unit length). This may be accomplished, for example, by varying the geometry of the accelerator by tapering the coil and the outer metal pipe or decreasing the number of turns of the coil per meter along the axis of acceleration. In one preferred embodiment the diameter of the metal pipe and diameter of the coil are tapered together in a constant ratio and the number of turns of the coil per meter is held constant.
The Helical Resonator Ion Accelerator can have a pulse repetition rate of 10-100 pulses/second, a pulse duration of about 5×10−9 seconds, and an average power of 1-10 kilowatts. Deuteron ions are injected into the proximal end of the accelerator with injection velocity of about 25 key or 1.55 meters/microsecond, and the final velocity achieved by the accelerator as calculated is about 5.4 Mev or 22 meters/microsecond for an accelerator length of about 6 meters. Only about 2 Mev are required to reach the peak cross-section of the D+D→He+n (2.45 Mev) as shown in FIG. 5 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,097.
If the ions are deuteron ions they are directed at a target containing deuteron atoms, typically absorbed as D2 in a thin layer of Titanium or palladium on a thermally conductive substrate such as copper or silver.
It is an object of the present invention to produce a lower cost compact accelerator of deuterons.
It is another object of the present invention to provide the equations designing a tapered helical pulse line ion accelerator.
Is a further object of the present invention to provide well focused short deuteron pulses which can be used to interrogate goods within packages, suitcases, or shipping containers.
Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring more particularly to
A highly efficient helical particle accelerator is described that overcomes a number of problems and limitations of previous designs. By mathematically representing the device as a transmission line, existing equations can be used to calculate parameters to optimize the function and efficiency.
Space wound helical coils such as coil 36 are wound such that there is space between adjacent windings. The effective resistance increases due to the proximity effect when two or more wires are wound into a coil The effective resistance is a combination of three terms, the proximity effect, the skin effect, and the bulk resistance. Wire spacing and wire radius on coils with two or more turns, as the number of turns increases, the wire spacing reaches a spacing asymptote of approximately 1.8. The space between wires for a long solenoid for the minimum resistance can be calculated as follows:
Wire spacing=2c−2a=2×1.8Ca−2×a=1.6×a
Helical accelerators can be designed using a lossy resistive terminator mode, a resonance mode, or a traveling wave mode. In any of these modes the particle must be injected during the correct phase of the exciting voltage to provide the optimum acceleration. The current method using a helical accelerator is usually accomplished by generating a saw tooth wave form, launching it on one end of the accelerator, and capturing it on the distal end with a resistive terminator to prevent reflections. This process is very inefficient and generates a significant amount of heat in the resistive terminator.
This invention describes two methods for building helical accelerators. In the resonance mode the helix is used as an open resonator with no external shield or as an enclosed resonator that resembles a resonant coaxial cable. In either case the helix can be resonated in either quarter wave (π/4) or half wave (π/2) mode. The preferred method is the π/2 mode since the peak voltages are found in the center of the helix.
In the traveling wave mode, which is shown in
The process begins by injecting a sine wave signal into the directional coupler shown in
At the distal end the signal is removed from the coil and transferred to a second coaxial cable using similar matching techniques as is done on the proximal end. The wave entering the coupler and the injected wave must be in phase with each other so that enhancement will take place. The helical coil has a maximum frequency in the mid 100 kHz range. If the helix is to be resonated, MatLab models have shown that the half wave resonance is approximately 4 MHz in each of the two resonators.
The modeled coil was 0.56 meters long with a circumference of 0.28 meters and a pitch of 0.0025 meters. The wire length is thus 57.2 meters. The wire is insulated 16 AWG magnet wire. The coil contains 200 turns of wire spaced to minimize the resistive effects from skin effect and proximity effect. Knowing the group velocity and the physical characteristics of the coil, the phase velocity can be calculated.
vg=4.0m/μs
Cl=0.508 m
Ct=0.508/4.0=0.127 μs
Wt=57.2 m
The phase velocity vg appears to be exceeding the velocity of light. This occurs because the axial wave is not traveling directly on the wire, but instead is actually skipping wires while traveling axially on the helix.
The ion particles can be injected at a point on the waveform where the electric field in front of the particle is “pulling” on the particle. As the ion enters the helix the electric field behind the ion particle will “push” on the particle accelerating it to the distal end of the helix. A second helix, with a faster wave speed, could follow the first helix and add yet more acceleration. This could continue for any number of helices to provide the required ion particle velocity.
A pulse could be used in lieu of a sine wave to accelerate the ion beam using the helical structure. The advantage of a pulse is that the electric field will be significantly larger due to the rising edge of the pulse. One method of generating microsecond pulses with nanosecond rise and fall times is to use a Blumlein generator. These devices can be built using discrete components or coaxial transmission lines. If stacked Blumleins are used the characteristic output impedance can become significant (200 to 1000 Ohms). However, the increase in output impedance can be used to match the Blumlein to the helical ion accelerator which also has high characteristic impedance.
Another component of the invention is the calculation of the tapering of the helix to provide constant acceleration on the ion beam. Assuming that one applies a constant force, the velocity of the particle will increase linearly to a first order approximation.
L=>f(n2)
C=>f(n)
v=1/√{square root over (L×c)}
v=>1/f3(n2/2)
v=k1×x
n=k2×x
L=inductance/unit L
C=capacitance/unit L
n=number of turns/unit L
v=particle velocity
x=fractional position along accelerator
k1 and k2=constants
Therefore, n/ul varies as x−2/3.
As shown in
And, as shown in
As shown in
In order to prevent the injected voltage waveform from reflecting from the distal end 40 of the coil, the coil is grounded to a matching resistive network/column. In the case where the high-voltage pulse is injected using impedance matching using a resistance network/column, the output of the coil is through a further matching resistive network/column and can be conducted to a directional coupler 54 to allow use of a waveform generator 56 to output a waveform which adds to the output of the coil 36 which can be recirculated to the proximal end 38 of the coil 36 and reinjected into the coil 48 as shown in
Ion injection is, for example, a Helicon type plasma injector and ion source which injects deuteron ions along the axis 32 of the vacuum chamber 30 formed by the hollow dielectric pipe 28.
The design of the accelerator 22 is based on equations below where it is shown how the accelerator geometry or winding pitch can be selected to achieve a desired acceleration of the injected electric pulse and therefore the injected ions. A design based on using these equations to model systems is shown in
In order to achieve maximum acceleration of the deuteron ions it is necessary that the velocity of the electric field accelerate as it moves along the axis of the accelerator, otherwise the ions will outrun the traveling wave having a constant velocity in the accelerator tube 28. The traveling wave velocity can be accelerated by tapering the impedance of the accelerator in the direction of wave propagation (i.e., reducing the impedance per unit length). This may be accomplished for example by varying the geometry of the accelerator by tapering the coil and the outer metal pipe or decreasing the number of turns of the coil per meter along the axis of acceleration. See below equations of design and their derivation. In one preferred embodiment, shown in
The Helical Resonator Ion Accelerator 22 can have a pulse repetition rate of 10-100 pulses/second, a pulse duration of about 5×10−9 seconds, and an average power of 1-10 kilowatts. Deuteron ions can be injected into the proximal end 38 of the accelerator 22 with an injection velocity of from about 18 keV, 1.3 m/μsec, to about 25 keV or 1.5 meters/microsecond, and the final velocity achieved by the accelerator as calculated is about 5.4 MeV or 20.2 meters/microsecond for an accelerator length of about 6 meters.
The computer programs for Mathlab ODE45: Ion particle Dynamics in an Accelerating Electric Field, and Electric Field Assist Ion Accelerator below are used to provide simulation curves which show varying the injection velocity of deuteron ions 60 with respect to the voltage wave 62 produced input pulse. 10 shows the input velocity of 1.3×106 m/s and for this input velocity
The output of the program in
The deuteron ions are directed at a target 58 shown in
Design Equations
The conservation of energy and the conservation of momentum are used to generate the controlling equations for particle dynamics. If nuclear fission or fusion is involved then Einstein's equation relating energy to mass must be included.
Two particles undergoing an elastic collision with initial velocities u1 and u2 and final velocities v1 and v2.
v1=(u1(m1−m2)+2m2u2)/(m1+m2)
v2=(u2(m2−m1)+2m1u1)/(m2+m2)
The velocities u1 and u2 are the initial velocities of mass m1 and m2 respectively. The velocities are the final velocities of mass m1 and m2 respectively. If the mass m2 is allowed to go to zero in the limit the following equations are generated.
v1=u1
v2=2u1−u2
The velocities are vectors but the equations are one dimensional and therefore the signs will determine their direction. The equations can be rewritten with variables that represent use in ion acceleration.
vp—velocity of the ion particle
vpw—velocity of the pulse wave
q—the unit charge
m—the mass of a ion
Vp—voltage to accelerate the ion
Vi— voltage used by the injector
vf—final ion velocity
To calculate the final velocity vf we derive the following equation.
vf=2vpw−vp
vpw=√{square root over (2Vpq/m)}+vp
vp=√{square root over (2Viq/m)}
v2/f=(2q/m)×(2√{square root over (Vp)}+√{square root over (Vi)})2
The equations will be derived that describe how the velocity should change with the position along the accelerator and how the velocity versus position profile can be obtained by varying the geometry of the accelerator and/or the winding pitch.
The derivation is a one dimensional second order solution ignoring such things as space charge, beam loading, pulse injection and removal, beam current luminance, and focusing.
An accelerating ion in an electric field providing maximum acceleration can be calculated as follows.
f=ma and f=qE
The unit of charge is q and the electric field is E.
The electric field can be calculated as the voltage V divided by the length of the field d
E=V/d
The variable d is equal to d=v×tr where v is the current velocity and tr is the electric field rise time.
Combing these equations with acceleration on the left hand side:
Using separation of variables:
v×dv=qV/mtr×dt
Integrating both sides and rearranging terms we obtain:
v2=2qV/mtr×time
v=2qV/mtr×time
To find the equation for position we integrate velocity with respect to time.
p=2/3×√{square root over (2qV/mtr×time3)}
Using the equations for velocity and position we can calculate velocity as a function of position. This result will be used to determine the geometry of the accelerator.
V2=2qV/mtr×time
Solving for time
time=v2mtr/2qV
This result can be used in place of time in the position equation and we can solve for velocity as a function of position along the accelerator.
p=2/3×√{square root over (v6×(mtr/2qV)2)}
p=v
3
×mt
r/3qV
Finally we have:
For a transmission line:
Z=√{square root over (L/C)}
v=1/√{square root over (LC)}
Therefore:
Squaring both sides and rearranging terms we have:
The equations (Briggs 2006) that describe the inductance and capacitance per unit length of a coaxial cable with a helical wound center are:
Where the diameter of the helical coil is a, the diameter of the outer shield is b, the number of turns is n, the relative magnetic permeability is μ0, and the electric permittivity is ∈. All units are per unit length.
Combining the last three equations provides multiple solutions by varying a, b and n. There are a number of simplifications that could be made such as allowing the ratio of a/b to be constant. The values of these three variables should have optimum values.
Keeping the ratio constant and the number of turns per unit length constant we get the following equation:
It should be understood that the magnet of the electrically powered solenoid magnet may be tapered or cylindrical, and is positioned around the Pulse Line Ion Accelerator (PLIA) coil 36 and has two poles at the two ends of the solenoid 43. The solenoid magnet 43 could be a replaced by a permanent magnet. If a solenoid is used, it is usually designed as a superconducting magnet. The path of the charged particles forms a helix following the lines of magnetic force created by by the solenoid or permanent magnet. This keeps the charged particle cloud from expanding, thus, in effect, focusing charged particles of an ion beam.
Radial multi-pole focusing magnets are herein defined as an arrangement of magnets forming a magnetic beam optic 76, for focusing an ion beam which has at least two groups 72 of two opposed magnets 74 radially directed at the axis 32 of the outer metal pipe 42 such as such as, quadrupoles, sextupoles, octupoles, decapoles, or magnets having more than ten poles. Systems having more than three even numbers of poles can better correct ion-optical aberrations. Radial multi-pole focusing magnets can be segmented permanent magnets or electromagnets like the sextupole magnetic lens 76 shown in
The radial multi-pole focusing magnets and the solenoid magnet are generally have non-oscillating magnet fields which do not change, or change with a low frequency, and so can easily penetrate metals with low magnetic permeability, i.e., μ [H/m], such as aluminum which has a permeability near that of a classical vacuum. Aluminum can be used for the material forming the metal pipe.
Particles accelerated by a pulse line ion accelerator (PLIA) can be focused within the accelerating tube by an electrostatic focusing beam optic such as the electrostatic focusing Einzel lens 78 as shown in
It should be understood that where a single accelerator section 22 having a hollow dielectric pipe, coil outer metal pipe and pulse generator is described, multiple accelerator sections 22 could be used to increase the acceleration of ions as shown in
It should be understood that various pulse generators could be used, such as those shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,465,840 to Alan Dower Blumlein Deceased, or an alternative drive circuit could form the pulse generator based on the vacuum tube as illustrated in
It is understood that the invention is not limited to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces all such modified forms thereof as come within the scope of the following claims.
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright or mask work owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/032,803 filed on Sep. 20, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,161,430, and claims the benefit of priority of provisional U.S. App. No. 61/703,696, filed on Sep. 20, 2012, which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2465840 | Blumlein | Mar 1949 | A |
4179615 | Kraus | Dec 1979 | A |
5925886 | Seki | Jul 1999 | A |
6777699 | Miley et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6907097 | Leung | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20030152186 | Jurczyk | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20110085632 | Klein et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110274228 | Lopez | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120328066 | Burke et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
G.J. Caporaso, R.J. Briggs, B.R. Poole, S.D. Nelson, “Dispersion Analysis of the Pulseline Accelerator,” Proceedings of 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, Tennessee. |
S.D. Nelson, G. Caporaso, A. Friedman, B.R. Poole, R. Briggs, W. Waldron, “Electromagnetic Simulations of Helical-based Ion Acceleration Structures,” 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, Tennessee, May 9, 2005. |
W.L. Waldron, L.L. Reginato, E. Henestroza, A. Friedman, R.J. Briggs, “Studies of the Pulse Line Ion Accelerator,” Proceedings of PAC07, Albuquerque, New Mexico. |
A. Friedman, R.J. Briggs, D.P. Grote, E. Henestroza, and W.L. Waldron, “Modeling the Pulse Line Ion Accelerator (PLIA): an algorithm for quasi-static field solution.” |
Richard J. Briggs, “Pulse line ion accelerator concept,” Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams, Jun. 21, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61703696 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14032803 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14880848 | US |