Description will now be given of a helical-scan-type magnetic tape recording and reproducing apparatus and magnetic tape recording and reproducing method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in
That is, as shown in
In the example shown in
On the other hand, reproducing signals from the reproducing heads HR1 and HR2 provided to the rotary drum 20 are respectively subjected to amplification/equalization/detection or the like by a reproducing circuit 105a and a reproducing circuit 105b, decoded by a decoder circuit 106 into reproducing data in the form of digitized signals, and sent to the host computer 101 from the SCSI interface circuit 102.
Further, the reproducing signals obtained with the reproducing heads HR1 and HR2 are also used for the drive/control of the actuator 40, and error rates at which these reproducing signals are erroneously reproduced (read) are respectively measured by an error-rate measuring circuit 107a and an error-rate measuring circuit 107b. The measured error rates are subjected to AV conversion before being transmitted to a CPU 110.
The error-rate measuring circuits 107a and 107b measure error rates at a plurality of points on the tracks Tr1, Tr2 that will be described later, for example, 11 points P1, P2 . . . P11 set at, for example, equal intervals at the same positions of the tracks Tr1, Tr2 as shown in
Further, these reproducing signals are supplied to point detecting circuits 108a and 108b. Upon arrival at the point P1, P2, . . . P11 set by the CPU 110 in advance, the point detecting circuits 108a and 108b inform the error-rate measuring circuits 107a and 107b of the arrival at a measurement point, thus performing measurement of the error rate at that point.
Further, the CPU 110 includes a RAM (memory) 160 serving as a storage area for the error rates at the respective points P1, P2, . . . P11 and the like.
As for the signal for driving/controlling the actuator 40 to which each of the recording heads HW1 and HW2 and reproducing heads HR1 and HR2 is attached, first, as shown in
Since the rotary transformer 150 cannot transmit a DC voltage, the rotary transformer 150 uses the V-F conversion circuits 121a, 122b, 122c, and 122d and the F-V conversion circuits 123a, 123b, 123c, and 123d in combination. Further, the actuator 40 used has such a characteristic that, like a piezoelectric element, for example, its displacement changes in accordance with the voltage. In this embodiment, as shown in
Further, as shown in
Next, referring to
As shown in
At this time, information recorded by the recording head HW1 is reproduced by the reproducing head HR1, and information recorded by the recording head HW2 is reproduced by the reproducing head HR2.
In this case, the reproducing head HR1 an the recording head HW1, and the reproducing head HR2 and the recording head HW2 are attached to the rotary drum 20 at substantially the same height so that they follow the same orbit when the rotary drum 20 rotates about its axis at a constant RPM, and in such a way that their respective rotation axes become symmetrical (see
As shown in
According to the head configuration shown in
Accordingly, the tracks Tr1 and Tr2 are formed in the areas scanned by the recording heads HW1 and HW2 and information are recorded onto the tracks Tr1 and Tr2. The recorded information are reproduced as the reproducing heads HR1 and HR2 scan the tracks Tr1 and TR2 on which information have been thus recorded. At this time, new information is recorded, and data reproduction (read-after-write (simultaneous recording and reproduction) for verifying that information has been recorded without error is performed at slightly shifted timing.
In a helical scan system in which the tape 10 is wound on the rotary drum 20 in a spiral fashion and the rotary head scans the tape 10, the running conditions of the reproducing heads HR1 and HR2 are roughly classified into a case (locus α1) in which the reproducing heads HR1 and HR2 are running on-track as described above so as to trace the substantially centerline of the track Tr as shown in
Next, the track Tr1, Tr2 of the magnetic tape 10 used in the helical-scan-type magnetic tape recording and reproducing apparatus according to this embodiment will be described with reference to
Generally, the smaller the width of the track Tr1, Tr2, the more the track Tr1, Tr2 is curved in an S shape, and it is necessary for data reproduction to be performed in a satisfactory manner from the track Tr1, Tr2 of such a curved shape by the reproducing head HR1, HR2. To this end, in order to ensure that data reproduction be performed along the curved shape of the track Tr1, Tr2, according to this embodiment, a plurality of, for example, 11 points P1, P2, . . . P11 are determined on the track Tr1, Tr2, and error rates at these 11 points P1, P2, . . . P11 are sequentially measured. The number of these measurement points may be determined as required.
These measurement points P1, P2, . . . P11 will now be described. As these points P1, P2, . . . P11, header addresses for identifying individual data blocks from among a large number of data blocks constituting a track format are used. The use of the header addresses means that it is not necessary to record redundant signals for DT (Dynamic Tracking) servo.
An example of track format (AIT3 format) is shown in
The above-described header addresses are addresses (0 to 511) represented by the first 9 bits of the header 35. In this case, since the number of data blocks on one track Tr1 (Tr2) is set as 336, for example, 11 header addresses are selected as appropriate as the measurement points P1, P2, . . . P11 from among 0 to 355. In order for the bend of the track Tr1, Tr2 to be uniformly measured along the entire length of the track Tr1, Tr2, for example, as shown in
In this embodiment, during data recording (read-after-write), the operations of the flow chart shown in
Further, in this embodiment, during data recording (read-after-write), the operations of the flow chart shown in
In this embodiment, during data recording (read-after-write), the above-mentioned processing is repeated, and for each of the points P1, P2, . . . P11, the recorded control voltage is updated and supplied to each actuator 40.
Referring to the flow chart shown in
At the next scan of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2), a reproduction signal from the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) is supplied to each of the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) and point detecting circuit 108a (108b). Upon detecting the point P1 on the track Tr1 (Tr2) by the point detecting circuit 108a (108b), a voltage with this initial value added to a voltage V1 for causing movement by +1 unit of a first unit (for example, for moving the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by +1 μm), for example, 10 V, is supplied to the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) as a control voltage, thus moving (wobbling) the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by +1 unit. The error rate at the point P1 is measured by the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) at this time, and the error rate at this time is stored as the error rate [+1] at the point P1 into the memory 160 via the CPU 110 (step S2).
At the next scan of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2), a reproduction signal from the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) is supplied to each of the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) and point detecting circuit 108a (108b). Upon detecting the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2) by the point detecting circuit 108a (108b), a voltage with this initial value added to a voltage −V1 for causing movement by −1 unit (for example, for moving the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by −1 μm), for example, −10 V, is supplied to the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) as a control voltage, thus moving (wobbling) the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by −1 unit. The error rate at the point P1 is measured by the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) at this time, and the error rate at this time is stored as the error rate [−1] at the point P1 into the memory 160 via the CPU 110 (step S3).
At the next scan of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2), a reproduction signal from the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) is supplied to each of the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) and point detecting circuit 108a (108b). Upon detecting the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2) by the point detecting circuit 108a (108b), a voltage with this initial value added to a voltage 2V1 for causing movement by +2 units of the first unit, for example, 20 V, is supplied to the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) as a control voltage, thus moving (wobbling) the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by +2 units. The error rate at the point P1 is measured by the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) at this time, and the error rate at this time is stored as the error rate [+2] at the point P1 into the memory 160 via the CPU 110 (step S4).
At the next scan of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2), a reproduction signal from the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) is supplied to each of the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) and point detecting circuit 108a (108b). Upon detecting the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2) by the point detecting circuit 108a (108b), a voltage with this initial value added to a voltage −2V1 for causing movement by −2 units of the first unit, for example, −20 V, is supplied to the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) as a control voltage, thus moving (wobbling) the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by −2 units. The error rate at the point P1 is measured by the error-rate measuring circuit 107a (107b) at this time, and the error rate at this time is stored as the error rate [−2] at the point P1 into the memory 160 via the CPU 110 (step S5).
Next, the CPU 110 determines whether or not the following relationship holds with respect to the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2) (step S6):
error rate[+2]<error rate[0]
If the error rate [0] is larger than the error rate [+2], a voltage V2 for causing movement by +1 unit of a second unit (for example, for moving the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by 0.1 μm), for example, 1 V, is added to the initial value of the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) at the point P1 on the track Tr1 (Tr2), and the resultant is set as an updated control voltage for the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) at the point P1 on the track Tr1 (Tr2) (step S7).
If it is determined in step S6 that the error rate [0] is not larger than the error rate [+2], the process transfers to step S8, and it is determined whether or not the following relationship holds:
error rate[−2]<error rate[0]
If the error rate [0] is larger than the error rate [−2], a voltage −V2 for causing movement by −1 unit of the second unit (for example, for moving the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) by −0.1 μm), for example, −1 V, is added to the initial value of the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) at the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2), and the resultant is set as an updated control voltage for the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) at the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2) (step S9).
If the result of the determination in step S8 is [NO], it is determined that
error rate[+2]=error rate[0]=error rate[−2],
and the updated control voltage for the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) at the point P1 of the track Tr1 (Tr2) is set as the same initial control voltage value as that of the present time (step S10).
In this embodiment, the operations of the flow chart shown in
Since the above-described processing is repeated in this embodiment, the reproducing head HR1, HR2 scans the portion of the track Tr1, TR2 with the best error rate, thus making it possible to perform data reproduction in a satisfactory manner even in the case of a narrow track.
In this embodiment, since the reproducing head HR1 (HR2) is subjected to wobbling at the point P1, P2, . . . P11 of the track Tr1 (TR2), an error may occur at the point P1, P2, . . . P11. However, there is no fear of an error occurring for the track as a whole.
In this embodiment, after the operations of the flow chart shown in
Referring to the flow chart of
For example, as shown in
Next, the process transfers to step S12, and it is determined whether or not the recording track width W2 recorded by the recording head HW2 is larger than the recording track width W1 recorded by the recording head HW1. If it is determined that the recording track width W2 is larger than the recording track width W1, the voltage V2 for causing movement by +1 unit of the second unit (for example, for moving the recording head HW2 by 0.1 μm), for example, 1V, is added to the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the recording head HW2 at the point P1 of the tracks Tr1 and Tr2, and the resultant is set as the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the recording head HW2 (step S13).
If it is determined in step S12 that the recording track width W2 is not larger than the recording track width W1, it is determined whether or not the recording track width W2 recorded by the recording head HW2 and the recording track width W1 recorded by the recording head HW1 are equal (step S14). If it is determined that the recording track widths W1 and W2 are equal, the control voltage to be supplied to the actuator 40 of each of the recording heads HW1 and HW2 at the point P1 of the tracks Tr1 and Tr2 is not changed (step S15).
If it is determined in step S14 that the recording track widths W1 and W2 are not equal, this means that the recording track width W2 is smaller than the recording track width W1. Accordingly, the voltage −V2 for causing movement by −1 unit of the second unit (for example, for moving the recording head HW2 by −0.1 μm), for example, −1V, is added by to the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the recording head HW2 at the point P1 of the tracks Tr1 and Tr2, and the resultant is set as the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the recording head HW2 (step S16).
In this embodiment, the operations of the flow chart shown in
Since the above-described processing is repeated in this embodiment, the recording track widths W1 and W2 at the points P1, P2, . . . P11 of the tracks Tr1 and Tr2 by the recording heads HW1 and HE2 can be made uniform at all times.
In this embodiment, during data recording (read-after-write), after executing the operations of the flow chart shown in
According to this embodiment, the reproducing head HR1, HR2 scans the portion with the best error rate at each of a plurality of, for example, 11 points P1, P2, . . . . P11 of the track Tr1, Tr2, thereby making it possible to reproduce data in a satisfactory manner even in the case of a narrow track.
According to this embodiment, since wobbling is performed at a plurality of, for example, 11 points P1, P2, . . . . P11 of the track Tr1, Tr2 in determining an update of the control voltage for the actuator 40 of the reproducing head HR1, HR2, an error may occur at the point P1, P2, . . . . P11. However, there is no fear of an error occurring for the track as a whole, and data reproduction can be performed in a satisfactory manner.
Further, according to this embodiment, on the basis of the error rate profiles at a plurality of, for example, 11 points P1, P2, . . . . P11 of the track Tr1, Tr2, a control voltage is supplied to the actuator 40 of each of the recording heads HW1 and HW2 so that the recording track widths W1 and W2 by the recording heads HW1 and HW2 at these points P1, P2, . . . P11 becomes uniform. Therefore, the heights of the recording heads HW1 and HW2 are controlled in a satisfactory manner, and the recording track widths W1 and W2 can be made uniform at all times.
It is needless to mention that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment but may adopt various other configurations without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-155017 | Jun 2006 | JP | national |