Sprinkler systems for turf irrigation are well known. Typical systems include a plurality of valves and sprinkler heads in fluid communication with a water source, and a centralized controller connected to the water valves. At appropriate times the controller opens the normally closed valves to allow water to flow from the water source to the sprinkler heads. Water then issues from the sprinkler heads in predetermined fashion.
There are many different types of sprinkler heads, including above-the-ground heads and “pop-up” heads. Pop-up sprinklers, though generally more complicated and expensive than other types of sprinklers, are thought to be superior. There are several reasons for this. For example, a pop-up sprinkler's nozzle opening is typically covered when the sprinkler is not in use and is therefore less likely to be partially or completely plugged by debris or insects. Also, when not being used, a pop-up sprinkler is entirely below the surface and out of the way.
The typical pop-up sprinkler head includes a stationary body and a “riser” which extends vertically upward, or “pops up,” when water is allowed to flow to the sprinkler. The riser is in the nature of a hollow tube which supports a nozzle at its upper end. When the normally-closed valve associated with a sprinkler opens to allow water to flow to the sprinkler, two things happen: (i) water pressure pushes against the riser to move it from its retracted to its fully extended position, and (ii) water flows axially upward through the riser, and the nozzle receives the axial flow from the riser and turns it radially to create a radial stream. A spring or other type of resilient element is interposed between the body and the riser to continuously urge the riser toward its retracted, subsurface, position, so that when water pressure is removed the riser assembly will immediately return to its retracted position.
The riser assembly of a pop-up or above-the-ground sprinkler head can remain rotationally stationary or can include a portion that rotates in continuous or oscillatory fashion to water a circular or partly circular area, respectively. More specifically, the riser assembly of the typical rotary sprinkler includes a first portion (e.g. the riser), which does not rotate, and a second portion, (e.g., the nozzle assembly) which rotates relative to the first (non-rotating) portion.
The rotating portion of a rotary sprinkler riser typically carries a nozzle at its uppermost end. The nozzle throws at least one water stream outwardly to one side of the nozzle assembly. As the nozzle assembly rotates, the water stream travels or sweeps over the ground, creating a watering arc.
One drawback with this type of sprinkler nozzle is uneven coverage and distribution of water. Typically, if water is thrown in a coherent stream at some trajectory relative to the surface to be watered, the stream will tend to water a doughnut shaped ring around the sprinkler with little water being deposited close to the sprinkler. This is obviously a disadvantage since the vegetation closest to the sprinkler will be under-watered. One way of compensating for this could be to increase the length of time the sprinkler is allowed to run. However, increasing water usage to ensure proper watering of vegetation closest to the sprinkler also means that vegetation further away from the sprinkler (i.e., in the outer radial portions of the watering pattern) will then be over-watered.
Another drawback associated with conventional sprinkler nozzle designs involves water turbulence. For example, as water flows through the fluid passageway of a nozzle, it impacts against the walls or surfaces of the passageway. Water flowing through the passageway and impacting against the surface often changes the stream of water exiting the nozzle from a substantially droplet form into a spray or mist form. As such, water thrown in a spray or mist form is easily blown by the wind and, thereby, produces inaccurate and uneven irrigation of the target area.
To compensate for uneven water distribution, sprinkler systems must be arranged so that the spray patterns of each sprinkler overlap with one another. Known in the industry as head-to-head coverage or head-to-head spacing, this type of sprinkler arrangement ensures overlap of watered areas to produce uniform water application. However, this arrangement tends to be rather costly and labor intensive at the initial set-up due to the quantity of sprinkler heads and accessory components required. Further, as with any system, the greater the number of components, the greater the cost to maintain such a system.
In view of the above, there is a need for an improved sprinkler nozzle for both above-the ground and pop-up rotary sprinkler systems. In particular, it is desirable that the nozzle applies water in a uniform pattern that provides even coverage and distribution of water. In addition, the nozzle should also be configured to include a broad throw pattern with even water distribution over the entire area. Furthermore, it is desirable that the nozzle reduce water turbulence in order to deliver optimum water-efficient coverage over the irrigation surface.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved irrigation sprinkler nozzle system that overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
The present invention seeks to achieve this object in one preferred embodiment by providing a helical restrictor insert for a sprinkler nozzle. The helical thread of the insert imparts a helical swirl into the water stream which changes the flow and distribution pattern of the water after leaving the nozzle. The position of the end of the helical thread can be positioned in line with the vertical axis of the sprinkler head to direct a portion of the water stream downward, close to the sprinkler head without adversely affecting the nearby turf (e.g., affecting loose soil or washing away grass seeds).
As the water passes through the insert 100, the outer diameter of the water stream is directed along the helical thread 102, causing an outer diameter of the water stream to swirl and reduce speed. The water stream then exits the sprinkler nozzle with an outer swirling portion of the stream that breaks off from a main portion of the stream, disbursing water over a larger area. In one example, the swirling portion of the stream can be directed towards nearby turf (e.g., by changing the rotational orientation of the insert within the sprinkler), allowing for improved “close up” irrigation.
This swirling motion generally produces larger droplets which are less affected by wind, thereby directing more water to its intended area. Additionally, the swirling motion produced from the insert 100 provides an improved distribution pattern, usually over the first 30 feet of the water stream from a typical sprinkler while allowing for optional adjustment of the insert 100 to achieve “close in” watering (i.e., better water distribution close to the sprinkler).
Generally, as the pitch of the thread 102 is increased, the swirl of the water stream increases and as the pitch decreases, the swirl decreases. Additionally, as the height of the thread 102 increases (i.e., the thread 102 further extends into the passage to decrease the diameter of the inner passage), the swirl of the stream also increases while a decrease in the height of the thread 102 decreases the swirl imparted to the stream. In this respect, the insert 100 can be shaped to achieve a desired swirl.
In one example, the pitch of the thread 102 is between about 8 and 10 threads per inch and about 0.06 to 0.160 inches minimum thread diameter (i.e., the diameter formed by the inner edge of the thread 102).
Referring to
Referring to
The nozzle base 120 is comprised of a housing 126 having a main nozzle opening 130, two front secondary nozzle openings 128 and two rear secondary nozzle openings 129. As best seen in
The two rear secondary nozzle openings 129 can similarly accept the plugs 122 or, as pictured in
As seen best in
Preferably the insert 100 is made from plastic, molded with an outer mold and an inner unwinding core. After the plastic has solidified within the mold, the unwinding core rotates within the insert 100 as the outer surface of the insert 100 is held and thereby prevented from rotation with the unwinding core. The unwinding core is finally rotated to eject the insert 100.
While the insert 100 has been described as a separate insert for a nozzle, another preferred embodiment may incorporate the structure of the insert 100, including the helical threads 102 with the nozzle as a single unitary piece. Further, this nozzle may be rotated relative to the nozzle base to achieve a desired distribution pattern on the surrounding turf. Additionally, the nozzle may include indicia on the outside surface of the nozzle to communicate the distribution pattern of the water when the nozzle is rotated at a specific orientation. For example, a top portion of the nozzle may indicate close up watering when the thread is rotationally oriented to disburse water near to the sprinkler.
Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments and applications, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of this teaching, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of or exceeding the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and descriptions herein are proffered by way of example to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
664067 | Turner | Dec 1900 | A |
1146394 | Best | Jul 1915 | A |
1395442 | MacGregor | Nov 1921 | A |
1667943 | Munz | Mar 1922 | A |
1731813 | Bloom | Oct 1929 | A |
2083282 | Thompson | Jun 1937 | A |
2086074 | Del Genovese | Jul 1937 | A |
2305210 | Wahlin | Dec 1942 | A |
2639941 | Glynn | May 1953 | A |
2709623 | Glynn | May 1955 | A |
2981483 | Pichon | Apr 1961 | A |
3054563 | Steinen | Sep 1962 | A |
3275248 | O'Brien et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3655132 | Rosic | Apr 1972 | A |
3716192 | Hunter | Feb 1973 | A |
3794245 | Wilson | Feb 1974 | A |
3920187 | Willis | Nov 1975 | A |
3921912 | Hayes | Nov 1975 | A |
4269354 | DeWitt | May 1981 | A |
4498626 | Pitchford | Feb 1985 | A |
5104045 | Kah, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5240184 | Lawson | Aug 1993 | A |
5810259 | Sinclair | Sep 1998 | A |
5975430 | Larsen | Nov 1999 | A |
6332581 | Chin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6923383 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
20030218082 | Malcolm | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050284956 | Mast | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
765 232 | Aug 1954 | DE |
14724 | Oct 1908 | GB |
161937 | Jun 1922 | GB |