Patent Grant
7830150
This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 national stage filing of International Application No. PCT/IB2005/001031, filed 19 Apr. 2005, which claims priority to South African Patent Application No. 2004/3188 filed on 28 Apr. 2004 in South Africa. The contents of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
THIS invention relates to an airborne electromagnetic prospecting system.
There are several airborne electromagnetic prospecting systems, which are typically used to detect underground bodies, such as sulphides, which could contain economic metals, such as copper, zinc and nickel. South African patent no. 98/11489, for example, discloses a prospecting system comprising an aircraft, which is arranged to be towed by a helicopter, and a high drag bird that is connected to the aircraft and towed by the aircraft at an angle of 0approximately 14° below the aircraft.
The aircraft is fitted with a transmitter comprising a transmitter loop and associated electronics for transmitting a primary electromagnetic field, for prospecting the terrain over which the helicopter is flying. A receiver, comprising a three-component receiving coil and associated electronics, is mounted inside the high drag bird for receiving and recording a resulting field, the resulting field having interacted with the underlying terrain. The resulting field comprises a combination of the primary field from the transmitter as well as a secondary field emanating from the underground bodies. The secondary field may then be extracted and processed so as to determine the nature of the underground bodies.
The particular arrangement disclosed in patent no. 98/11489 is advantageous in that the receiver is spaced a sufficiently great distance from the transmitter so as to significantly reduce the primary field component in the resulting field. It is common knowledge that, in order to measure accurately the resulting field, the position of the receiver in the high drag bird relative to the transmitter on the aircraft should ideally remain constant. However, since in the above described arrangement, the aircraft is simply towing the high drag bird containing the receiver, the relative positions tend to vary significantly, with, in particular, variations in the airspeed playing a detrimental role. For example, if the airspeed is reduced, the drag on the high drag bird will also be reduced, and it will therefore fly at an angle greater than 14° relative to the transmitter on the aircraft. This will result in a change in the amplitudes of the primary and secondary fields at the receiver, which adversely effects the accuracy of the recorded data.
Although a small change in the primary field can be effectively compensated for by electronic or signal processing means, a large change can not, because the receiver coil and electronics must have a perfect linear response to signals of different amplitude, which in practice is difficult to achieve. A significant change in the amplitude of the secondary field from the ground results in an incorrect interpretation of the data because the geometry of the transmitter, the receiver and ground surface must be accurately known for interpretation of sub-surface conductors. This follows from the laws of physics dealing with magnetic fields and electromagnetic induction. In addition, if the airspeed falls sufficiently, the receiver bird could drop low enough for it to strike the terrain over which the helicopter is flying, especially if the survey flying height of the aircraft above the ground surface is low.
According to the invention there is provided an airborne electromagnetic prospecting system comprising:
wherein the high drag bird is also attached to, and arranged to be towed by, the towing aircraft, so as to keep the position of the receiving means relative to the transmitting means substantially constant.
Advantageously, a drogue is fitted to the high drag bird so as to keep the high drag bird substantially in line with the transmitter loop structure.
Typically, the transmitter loop structure includes:
Conveniently, the transmitter loop structure is attached to the towing aircraft by a tow rope assembly comprising a plurality of tow ropes that are attached to spaced apart contact regions on the transmitter loop structure, the plurality of tow ropes being conjoined at a point, which in turn is connected to the towing aircraft by a further tow rope.
In one version of the invention, the transmitter loop structure, in use, defines a horizontal plane, with a tow rope extending between the high drag bird and a peripheral point of the transmitter loop structure.
In an alternate version of the invention, the transmitter loop structure, in use, defines a substantially vertical plane, with a tow rope assembly connecting the transmitter loop structure to the high drag bird.
Preferably, the high drag bird comprises:
Conveniently, the high drag bird is fitted with a high drag drogue, the drogue being connected to either the body housing the receiver means or the yoke assembly.
Advantageously, the high drag bird further comprises a wing.
Typically, the towing aircraft is a helicopter.
Referring first to
The transmitter loop structure 12 comprises a transmitter 22, which is arranged to hang vertically below a central point of the structure 12, and a transmitter loop wire 24, which in
A high drag bird 26 is attached to contact point 27 on the transmitter loop structure 12 by means of a tow rope 28 and to the towing aircraft 14 by means of a tow rope 30 via a yoke assembly 34. The yoke assembly 34 is advantageously arranged to reduce pitch, roll and yaw movement of the high drag bird 26.
The distance between the helicopter 14 and the yoke assembly 34 is approximately 65 m. The length of tow rope 20 is typically around 40 m, and the distance between the centre of the transmitter loop wire 24 and the receiving coils is around 30 m. However, this distance can be varied from 20 m to 60 m, depending on the type of exploration required. In this case, the length of the tow rope 30 will be shorter or longer than 65 m, with the length being selected so as to ensure that the transmitter and receiver are kept in essentially constant positions relative to each other when the helicopter 14 is flown at a range of survey speeds.
A drogue element 36 is fitted to the high drag bird 26 for keeping the distance between the transmitter and receiver coils essentially constant during flight and for ensuring good pitch, roll and yaw stability for the bird 26.
As explained above, the transmitter 22 and an auxiliary power unit (APU) is fitted to the transmitter loop structure 12 for transmitting a primary electromagnetic field. A three-component receiver coil 38, illustrated schematically, is fitted to the bird 26 for receiving a combination of the primary field from the transmitting coil 24 and an induced secondary field from the ground conductors traversed by the towing aircraft 14.
Referring to
Support cord 52, comprising six lengths of cable or rope which are electrically insulated from each other, also extends between the legs or components 50A to 50F for supporting the structure 12.
A pair of diametrically opposed beams 54 and 56, typically constructed from either fibreglass or a Kevlar™ composite, are secured to legs 50A and 50F, and 50C and 50D, respectively. These beams 54 and 56, as well as the central hub, define three contact points, 58, 59 and 60, respectively, for receiving the three tow ropes of tow rope assembly 16 in the embodiment shown in
The legs 50A to 50F extend from a central support post 66, typically constructed from a fibreglass or carbon fibre composite tube. The post 66 provides support for the transmitter loop structure 12, with twelve brace elements 68A, 68B, 68C, 68D, 68E, 68F, 68G and 68H, and four others that are not shown, extending from the post 66 towards points approximately mid way along the lengths of the legs 50A and 50F.
Legs 70 and 72 are pivotally connected to the bottom of the central support post 66 with the legs typically being constructed from flexible fibreglass composite tubes. The legs 70 and 72, together with a third leg (not shown), define a tripod for reducing landing impacts and to support the transmitter loop structure 12 in an approximately horizontal position whilst it is sitting on the ground.
Turning now to
Pitch stability for the transmitter loop structure 12, when flown in the horizontal position shown in
From
It is clear from
From
If the transmitter 22 is now rotated by electromechanical means (not shown) slowly through an angle of about 94° degrees so that its centre of gravity is aligned with the plane of the composite tubes 50A to 50F, which support the transmitter loop, it will cause the transmitter loop structure 12 to rotate to a vertical position. This is a reset of the heavy transmitter, which is now located approximately 1.7 m vertically below the tow point 49 and centre of gravity of the transmitter loop structure 12. Conveniently, the carriage assembly 74 is arranged to rotate into a sector defined between a pair of adjacent legs 50A to 50F and not into one of the legs, so that it can be rotated by the required 94° to align it with the plane of the legs.
If the helicopter now proceeds with forward flight, the high drag bird 26 will take up its position directly behind the transmitter loop structure, and as the forward speed increases, it will pull the cable 46 and tow rope assembly 42 tight. This ensures that the separation and alignment of the transmitter and receiver coils are essentially kept constant for a range of survey speeds.
After the survey flight is completed, the landing of the system is carried out by reducing the forward speed to zero and then rotating the transmitter 22 slowly back by 94° to its original liftoff position as shown in
Turning now to
Advantageously, the vertical component of the tension in the angled tow rope 30 together with the vertical component of the lift forces from the wing 105 and the angled yoke 34 exactly balances the downward weight of the bird 26. It should be clear from
Additional pitch and yaw stability is provided by both the drogue 36 and the long tube 98. Apart from its aerodynamic purpose of keeping the neutral point of the bird as far back as possible, the purpose of the long tube 98 is φ balance the bird 26 so that its centre of gravity is at point 101, which is in line with the yoke bearings 96 and also at the centre of the receiver coils 38. This arrangement ensures optimum pitch, roll and yaw stability for the bird and receiver coils during flight.
The drogue 36 provides a horizontal, backward force acting at point 102, which will result in pitch and yaw stability. The long narrow tube 98 has the advantage of moving the neutral point of the bird only slightly forward, compared to what it would be for the streamlined bird shell on its own without the balance tube being present. For a streamlined body of rotation such as the bird shell, the neutral point is usually considerably ahead of the centre of gravity 101 of the body, which provides a destabilizing force on the bird 26 during flight. The further back the neutral point is relative to the centre of gravity and the inline tow point bearings 96 of the bird 26, the better will be the bird's pitch and yaw stability.
The receiver coils 38 are mounted at the centre of gravity 101 of the bird, which reduces rotation of the coils in the earth's field during turbulent flight, which advantageously leads to reduced system noise levels.
The drogue 36 is constructed of a highly porous mesh fabric, which reduces turbulence created by the drogue 36 as it is dragged through the air. The porous mesh creates very small turbulent vortices behind the drogue, rather than one relatively large vortex as would be the case with a conventional large non-porous drogue element. This results in an essentially nonturbulent drag force being created at the back of the bird. It should be appreciated that other types of drag elements can be constructed that have a porous mesh or string type structure in order to provide a drag force that is as constant and smooth as possible. This together with elasticated drogue ropes 104 reduce the amount of mechanical vibration, which is transmitted from the drogue 36 to the bird 26. These vibrations are ultimately transmitted albeit with greatly reduced amplitudes through the receiver coil suspension system into the receiver coil, which then produce system noise. Noise is generated by angular vibration (rotation) of the receiver coils in the magnetic field of the earth, which is very strong when compared to the electromagnetic fields being measured.
It will be appreciated that the drogue 36 could rather be attached directly to the yoke bearing assembly 96 by means of another rearward facing yoke or by means of two ropes running backwards from the yoke bearing assembly 96 to the apex of the elasticated drogue ropes 104. In this case the aerodynamic drag forces acting on the drogue 36 are transmitted directly to the yoke bearing assembly 96. This alternative drogue attachment location will result in the pitch angle of the high drag bird 26 together with the enclosed receiver coils 101 always to be aligned with the pitch angle of the transmitter loop as the airspeed varies through a considerable range. In the first mentioned location for attaching the drogue at the rear end of the bird shell, as the airspeed decreases or increases, the direction of airflow over the drogue will be slightly different from that of the varying direction of alignment between the high drag bird and the transmitter loop. This will occur because in this case the drogue is attached at some distance from the yoke bearing assembly pivot point and therefore a pitching couple will be exerted on the bird as the airspeed decrease or increases which will result in the bird's alignment in pitch being slightly different from that of the transmitter loop. This will then generate a coupling change between the transmitter loop and the receiver coil, which is a potential source of noise in the system.
The combination of all these design features in the bird 26 thus lead to reduced roll, pitch and yaw motions during flight of the bird 26. This results in reduced rotation of the receiver coils in the earth's field and also keeps the transmitter-receiver coil geometry essentially constant. These features serve to reduce system noise, and thereby considerably improve the interpretation of the prospecting data.
The purpose of the wing 105 is to provide additional lift to the receiver bird 26. This enables the size of the drogue 36 to be reduced and/or for the helicopter electromagnetic system of the invention to be flown at lower airspeeds. The reason for this is that a smaller drogue force will then be required at low airspeeds in order to keep tension on the tow ropes 28 and 30 and hence to maintain the essentially constant transmitter receiver geometry. As the airspeed drops, drag will be reduced on the transmitter loop 12 and on the receiver drogue 36. This results in rotation of the tow cables 20, 28 and 30 in an anti-clockwise direction, as viewed on the drawing, thereby increasing the angle of attack of the wing 105. This action increases the lift to the receiver bird at these low airspeeds compared to what it would have been if the rotation had not taken place.
The wing 105 therefore allows the system to be flown at lower airspeeds whilst still maintaining the essentially fixed transmitter receiver geometry. If the airspeed increases substantially above the nominal survey airspeed, the angle of attack of the wing 105 will decrease and may even become slightly negative. This action reduces the lift from the wing 105 until it is zero or even slightly negative. This reduction in lift, however, only affects the transmitter receiver geometry slightly, provided that the increased drag on the drogue 36 and the tow cable 30 at the higher airspeeds is sufficient in order to keep tow cables 28 and 30 under tension.
The wing 105 is shown as being of solid form, but it will be apparent that in order to save weight, it could be constructed as a collapsible cloth element similar to the wing of a paraglider or microlight aircraft. In this case, the trailing edge supports 106 could be constructed from thin ropes rather than as stiff members as shown in
The primary advantage of the present system is that the fixed triad geometry of the components allows the relative positions of the transmitter coils on the transmitter structure and the receiver coils in the high drag bird to be kept substantially constant for a range of airspeeds of the airborne electromagnetic system. In particular, the bird 26 is arranged to be kept substantially aligned with the transmitter loop structure 12. This facilitates the accurate quantitative interpretation of the recorded airborne electromagnetic data.
In addition, the drogue 36 serves another important role in that by keeping the carrier 26 stable, the rotation of the receiver coils 38 in the earth's magnetic field, which is a major cause of noise and interference, is significantly reduced.
Furthermore, and coupled to the previous two advantages, the tow cable 30 prevents the receiver bird 26 from dropping too low if the airspeed falls significantly, which is not possible with the system disclosed in SA patent no. 98/11489. Thus, provided the drogue 36 is sufficiently large so that its drag or significantly reduced airspeeds, exceeds the horizontally forward component of the tow force acting on the tow rope 30, together with the tow force acting on tow rope 28, the essentially fixed triangular geometry between the transmitter, receiver and helicopter will be maintained. Lastly, the wing 105 provides additional lift at lower airspeeds such as those encountered when surveying up large hills. This enables the fixed triad geometry of the system to be maintained at these lower airspeeds. The receiver bird will thus have a greatly reduced probability of striking the ground when surveying at a typical flying height of 40 m above the ground surface in hilly terrain.
It is thus clear that the primary difference between the present invention and the invention described in SA Patent No. 98/11489 is the additional tow rope 30 which results in the following improvements. Firstly, it provides an essentially fixed geometry especially between the transmitter coil and the receiver coil, but also between these and the towing helicopter. This is because these three elements are connected by three nearly straight tow ropes and the aerodynamic and weight forces act on these in such a way as to keep this geometry essentially fixed. The forces acting on the large transmitter loop structure are a large weight acting downwardly, a tow cable force acting in a forward and upward direction, and a considerably smaller drag force acting horizontally rearwardly. The forces acting on the towed receiver bird are a large drag force horizontally rearwardly, a fairly small force acting in a horizontal forward direction along the tow cable, a moderately large force acting forwardly and upwardly towards the helicopter, a small force acting mainly upwards on the wing, and a fairly large bird weight force acting vertically downwardly. The forces acting on the helicopter can be split into its components which are a large weight force acting downwardly mainly from the transmitter loop and its structure but also from the receiver bird, and a small drag force horizontally backwards from the transmitter loop and from the receiver bird. An analysis of these forces show that they operate over a sufficiently wide survey speed range in such a way as to keep the geometry between the transmitter and receiver and helicopter essentially constant. This fixed geometry is advantageous for mineral prospecting because the geometry between the transmitter, the receiver and the ground surface must be known as accurately as possible for optimum detection of mineral deposits.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004/3188 | Apr 2004 | ZA | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2005/001031 | 4/19/2005 | WO | 00 | 1/25/2008 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2005/106536 | 11/10/2005 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2955251 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1960 | A |
| 6255825 | Seigel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6845936 | Mouge et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 20050001622 | Morrison et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 232 105 | Sep 1999 | CA |
| WO-9932905 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9 811 489 | Jun 1999 | ZA |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080211506 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
