This application claims priority to foreign French patent application No. FR 0905261, filed on Nov. 3, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The field of the invention is that of composite structural materials for the purpose of withstanding impacts and protecting against penetration. The main field of application is that of protective helmets for aircraft pilots. The structures according to the invention may, however, be used for any fields requiring very strong and lightweight protective structures.
In the field of helmets for warplane or helicopter pilots, it is desirable to produce shells which have the lowest possible mass in order to minimize the forces on the pilot's cervical vertebrae during accelerations of the aircraft. However, the helmet needs to provide sufficient protection, as described for example in military standards such as the standard entitled “Military Aircrew Helmet Impact Standard” published by “UK Ministry of Defence”.
The technological solutions employed for producing helmet shells must remain simple in industrial terms. The conventional solutions for solving this problem are:
The solutions offer satisfactory resistances to impacts and penetration with thicknesses of a few millimeters. If there is a desire to lighten these materials, however, the conventional technical means have already been explored. Mention may be made of reducing the proportion of resin, expedient choice of the armure of the fibres and the orientation of the successive plies of the fabric, optimizing the final baking of the monolith or using foams with variable thicknesses.
The structure according to the invention makes it possible either to improve the resistance to impact and penetration for a given thickness of composite, or to reduce the thickness of composite for a given resistance to impact and penetration. The technical solution consists in adding particular polymers in the region of the composite in order to increase the resistance to impact and penetration, with an equivalent mass. This addition is industrially very simple, since particles are dispersed in the base of a resin, then the resin is prepared and the composite is shaped and coated according to the same method as conventional preparation. In order to simplify production of the composite, the use of this solution is limited to the most sensitive zones of the head. Specifically, it has been shown that the regions of the top of the head and the ears withstand less energy than the rest of the skull before injury. Reference may be made to the report by J. McEntire, in Helmet Mounted Displays: Design Issues for Rotary-Wing Aircrafts, edited by C. E. Rash for all details on this subject.
More precisely, the invention firstly relates to a helmet shell made of a composite material comprising at least one “armure” of fabrics impregnated with a resin matrix, characterized in that certain dedicated parts of the “armure” are impregnated with a resin matrix comprising an additive adapted to reinforce the mechanical strength of the helmet, the said parts corresponding to the weakest zones of a human head, the remainder of the “armure” being impregnated with a resin matrix not comprising the said additive.
Advantageously, the resin is a resin of the epoxy type and the additive is based on acrylic block copolymers, and, more precisely, the acrylic block copolymers are of the “Nanostrength®” brand marketed by Arkéma.
Advantageously, the parts of the “armure” comprising the additive are the upper part of the shell, corresponding to the top of the skull, and the left and right lateral parts corresponding to the ears.
The invention secondly relates to a pilot helmet comprising at least one helmet shell according to one of the characteristics above.
Lastly, it thirdly relates to a method for producing a helmet shell made of composite material comprising at least one “armure” of fabrics impregnated with a resin matrix, the said method comprising the following steps:
The invention will be understood more clearly, and other advantages will become apparent, on reading the following description which is given nonlimitingly and with the aid of the appended figures, in which:
As already mentioned, a helmet shell made of composite material according to the invention comprises at least one “armure” of fabrics, certain parts of which are impregnated with a resin matrix comprising an additive adapted to reinforce the mechanical strength of the helmet, the said parts corresponding to the weakest zones of a human head. A conventional resin is kept for the other zones of the shell. Such a shell is represented in
A resin of the epoxy type is more particularly used, and the additive is based on acrylic block copolymers.
The added polymers have a so-called “triblock” structure which, once formulated with an epoxy resin, makes it possible to obtain structuring of the matrix on the nanometric scale. This structuring makes it possible to modify the mechanical properties of the composite significantly.
More precisely, the acrylic block copolymers are of the “Nanostrength®” brand marketed by Arkéma. The Nanostrength® compounds are divided into two families, namely:
In order to simplify production of the shell, it is of course possible to use a single resin comprising the additive in order to produce all of the shell. The production of such a shell, however, presents certain drawbacks. This is because adding polymers of the “Nanostrength®” type in epoxy resins increases the viscosity of the substance. This leads to operation being more difficult and a higher proportion of resin in the composite, which makes it heavier and more brittle.
As an exemplary embodiment, an “armure” consisting of three plies of poly-para-phenyleneterephthalamide, better known by the brand “Kevlar”, may be used as the composite. More precisely, it is feasible to choose “Kevlar” 129 of the brand Saatilarâ style 802, taffeta woven, with a density of 190 g/m2 and a thickness of 260 μm, coated with a resin of the reference “Epolam 2020” marketed by Axson and representing 40% of the mass of the composite. The reinforced parts consist of the same number of plies of the same reinforcing fabric but with an epoxy resin filled with “Nanostrength M22N”. The percentage of “Nanostrength M22N” may be between 5% and 15%. Tests of resistance to mechanical impacts on sample plates show that the deformation of the parts reinforced with “Nanostrength®” is about ten times less than that of the non-reinforced parts.
The method for producing the shell is represented schematically in
More precisely, the way of preparing the second base with a dispersion of “Nanostrength®” polymers is as follows:
The way of preparing the composite without “Nanostrength®” polymer is the same, except that no additive is added to the epoxy base. The pressing parameters, such as the pressure all the time, and the polymerization parameters such as the temperature, the pressure or the time, are the same for the unfilled resin as those mentioned above.
Impregnations with and without “Nanostrength®” may then be carried out sequentially, followed by simultaneous pressing and polymerization of all the regions of the shell. The impregnation and polymerization of the fabrics comprise the following steps:
During the impregnation step, the epoxy resin with or without “Nanostrength®” is applied with a brush in order to impregnate the reinforcement plies. A template may be used in order to delimit the application zones. A first template masks the top of the head and the ears, and makes it possible to apply the unfilled resin. A second template masks the front, rear and sides of the shell, and makes it possible to apply the resin filled with “Nanostrength®”.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09 05261 | Nov 2009 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2351235 | Shroyer et al. | Jun 1944 | A |
3567568 | Windecker | Mar 1971 | A |
3956447 | Denommee et al. | May 1976 | A |
3958276 | Clausen | May 1976 | A |
4023209 | Frieder et al. | May 1977 | A |
4748064 | Harpell et al. | May 1988 | A |
5057904 | Nagato et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5361420 | Dobbs et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5749096 | Fergason et al. | May 1998 | A |
7328462 | Straus | Feb 2008 | B1 |
20030199215 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200861 | Cordova et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20100287687 | Ho | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110047680 | Hoying et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110203024 | Morgan | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 300 089 | Apr 2003 | EP |
2008101138 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
B. McEntire, “Helmet-Mounted Displays: Design Issues for Rotary-Wing Aircraft, Chapter 7: Biodynamics,” SPIE (C. Rash, Ed.), Jan. 25, 2001, pp. 167-196. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110265235 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |