The present disclosure generally relates to a helmet whose purpose is to protect a wearer's head during a head impact. Extending radially outward from the wearer's head, the helmet may consist of one or multiple liner portions and one or multiple shell portions. Either way, there is typically a liner portion in contact with the wearer's head initially or during impact, that liner portion being herein defined as the subliner. The subliner may be comprised of individual subliner elements. The subliner is typically attached to an inner shell portion, the term inner having been added to unambiguously differentiate it from an outer shell portion in the case of a helmet with multiple shell portions. In helmets having just a single liner portion and a single shell portion, the liner portion would be the same as the subliner and the shell portion would be the same as the inner shell portion. In some helmets (typically hockey helmets) the inner shell portion may consist of individual shell segments. The subliner and inner shell portion together are herein defined as the helmet subliner system, and the present disclosure comprises an improved helmet subliner system, and an improved outer liner portion in the case of multiple shell helmets, to better protect the wearer from sustaining concussions and other head injuries.
Especially in multiple liner, multiple shell helmets, the subliner, as defined herein has been used primarily for obtaining the best fit and best comfort for the wearer. But as will be shown in this specification, the subliner, and more generally the subliner system may also be used to substantially improve the head protection performance of the helmet. The disclosure recognizes and takes advantage of the fact that all the forces that are applied to the wearer's head during a head impact are preferably applied through the subliner and its elements.
Recent postmortem brain investigations have found a high instance of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, in the donated brains of deceased NFL football players, many of whom had suffered debilitating symptoms during their lifetimes, including unexplained rage, extreme mood swings, and substantial cognitive degeneration, all of which may have begun years after their football playing ended. Current research shows that CTE can almost always be traced back to long term repetitive head impacts which may include both concussive and sub-concussive impacts. It is believed those impacts would have been characterized by a high level of head angular acceleration, sometimes called rotational acceleration. The improved helmet subliner system configuration of the present disclosure is specifically designed to help reduce the level of head angular acceleration during a head impact.
The present disclosure generally relates to a helmet whose purpose is to protect a wearer's head during an impact. More specifically, it relates to an improved version of the helmet disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 10,869,520, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. Pat. No. 10,869,520 discloses a subliner element to be located at the top of the head when the helmet is worn. The term subliner refers to liner elements that may come in contact with a wearer's head. The top subliner element is comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material capable of exhibiting a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%, and the element has a substantially flat lower surface which is also substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn. That latter requirement is to enable the liner element to slide by the wearer's head in the event of a horizontal impact while imparting little or no horizontal force to the wearer's head and to thereby substantially reduce the resulting angular acceleration (the main cause of concussions) about a horizontal axis oriented perpendicular to the impact direction. The design concept works well, but could function better where the mostly horizontal impact is accompanied by a substantial downwardly directed impact force. In that case the lower surface of the foam element may be pushed downward to at least partially conform with the curved top surface of the wearer's head, thereby precluding the element from sliding by the wearer's head without exerting a substantial horizontal force as was the desired purpose.
The present invention describes three alternative, structurally different designs of the top subliner element to result in, in the case of a significant horizontal impact in the presence of a significant downwardly directed impact force, a substantially lessened horizontal force being applied to the wearer's head at the place where it contacts the top subliner element.
Briefly stated, the present disclosure is directed to a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The head has a top area centered about a top of the wearer's head encompassing approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches. The helmet includes a subliner shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material. The shell has inner and outer surfaces. The shell is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of the wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. At least one subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The at least one subliner element includes a first foam pad constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface. The top surface is attached to the inner surface of the shell. A second foam pad is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material that is radially partitioned into individual and independent segments. The independent segments are nested with respect to each other such that the nested segments have side surfaces in slidable direct contacting engagement with side surfaces of adjacent nested segments. The second foam pad has a top surface attached to the bottom surface of the first foam pad. A third foam pad is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface, with the top surface of the third foam pad being attached to the bottom surface of the second foam pad. The bottom surface of the third foam pad is a substantially flat surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn.
Briefly stated, in another aspect the present disclosure is directed to a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The head has a pair of eyebrows, a pair of ears and an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head. The headband shaped area is approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide and has a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches above the eyebrows and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches above an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head. A top area is centered about a top of the wearer's head and encompasses approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches. A middle area of the head is defined between the headband area and the top area. The helmet includes a subliner shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material. The shell has inner and outer surfaces and is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of the wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. A subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, includes a plurality of a first type of subliner elements extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the first type of subliner elements are adapted to be aligned with the headband area when the helmet is worn. The first type of subliner elements are constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material and are radially partitioned into individual and independent segments. The independent segments are nested with respect to each other with double-sided nano tape positioned therebetween such that the nested segments have side surfaces in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape. At least one of a second type of subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the at least one of the second type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the middle area when the helmet is worn. The at least one of the second type of subliner element is constructed of a foam material. A third type of subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the third type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The third type of subliner element includes a first foam pad constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface. The top surface is attached to the inner surface of the shell. A second foam pad is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material and is radially partitioned into individual and independent segments. The independent segments are nested with respect to each other such that the nested segments have side surfaces in slidable direct contacting engagement with side surfaces of adjacent nested segments. The second foam pad has a top surface attached to the bottom surface of the first foam pad. A third foam pad is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface, The top surface of the third foam pad being attached to the bottom surface of the second foam pad. The bottom surface of the third foam pad is a substantially flat surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn. The at least one of the second type of subliner element is positioned between the plurality of the first type of subliner elements and the third type of subliner element.
Briefly stated, in another aspect the present disclosure is directed a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The head has a top area centered about a top of the wearer's head encompassing approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches. The helmet includes a subliner shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material. The shell has inner and outer surfaces. The shell is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of the wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. At least one subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The at least one subliner element extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The at least one subliner element includes a first foam pad constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface, with the top surface being attached to the inner surface of the shell. The bottom surface is generally planar and has a first fluoropolymer coating adhered thereto. A second foam pad is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface. The top surface of the second foam pad is generally planar and has a second fluoropolymer coating adhered thereto. The first and second foam pads are positioned with the first and second fluoropolymer coatings in sliding facing engagement. The bottom surface of the second foam pad is a substantially flat surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn.
Briefly stated, in another aspect the present disclosure is directed to a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The head has a pair of eyebrows, a pair of ears and an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head. The headband shaped area is approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide and has a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches above the eyebrows and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches above an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head. A top area is centered about a top of the wearer's head and encompasses approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches. A middle area of the head is defined between the headband area and the top area. The helmet includes a subliner shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material. The shell has inner and outer surfaces and is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of the wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. A subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, includes a plurality of a first type of subliner elements extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the first type of subliner elements are adapted to be aligned with the headband area when the helmet is worn. The first type of subliner elements is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material and is radially partitioned into individual and independent segments. The independent segments are nested with respect to each other with double-sided nano tape positioned therebetween such that the nested segments have side surfaces in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape. At least one of a second type of subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the at least one of the second type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the middle area when the helmet is worn. The at least one of the second type of subliner element is constructed of a foam material. A third type of subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the third type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The third type of subliner element includes a first foam pad constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface. The top surface being attached to the inner surface of the shell. The bottom surface is generally planar and has a first fluoropolymer coating adhered thereto. A second foam pad is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface and a bottom surface. The top surface of the second foam pad is generally planar and has a second fluoropolymer coating adhered thereto. The first and second foam pads being positioned with the first and second fluoropolymer coatings being in sliding facing engagement. The bottom surface of the second foam pad is a substantially flat surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn. The at least one of the second type of subliner element is positioned between the plurality of the first type of subliner elements and the third type of subliner element.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed analysis of the physical principles and detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiments will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the disclosure, particular arrangements and methodologies of preferred embodiments are shown in the drawings. It should be understood, however, that the disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangements or instrumentalities shown or the methodologies of the detailed description. In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “lower,” “bottom,” “upper” and “top” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “inwardly,” “outwardly,” “upwardly” and “downwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the helmet, and designated parts thereof, in accordance with the present disclosure. Unless specifically set forth herein, the terms “a,” “an” and “the” are not limited to one element, but instead should be read as meaning “at least one.” The terminology includes the words noted above, derivatives thereof and words of similar import. The terms “angular acceleration” and “rotational acceleration” should be taken as synonymous from a force vector perspective. Similarly, the words “acceleration” and “deceleration” should also be taken as synonymous from a force vector perspective. It should also be understood that the terms “about,” “approximately,” “generally,” “substantially” and like terms, used herein when referring to a dimension or characteristic of a component of the disclosure, indicate that the described dimension/characteristic is not a strict boundary or parameter and does not exclude minor variations therefrom that are functionally similar. At a minimum, such references that include a numerical parameter would include variations that, using mathematical and industrial principles accepted in the art (e.g., rounding, measurement or other systematic errors, manufacturing tolerances, etc.), would not vary the least significant digit.
Referring now to
Referring again to
To be able to appreciate why the lower surface 20a of subliner element of the third type 20 is preferred to be flat and horizontal, one may perform a simple experiment with one's own hand and one's own head. First, using one's hand, firmly cup the top of one's head. Then while still firmly cupping the head, forcefully move the cupping hand's forearm forward and backward, and side to side, and notice how the head is forced into violent motion likely involving significant head angular accelerations. Next, repeat the experiment while the hand is held flat and horizontal. The result:
almost no forced motion of the head, and thus no head angular acceleration.
Referring now to
The subliner element of the third type 20 further includes a second foam pad 112 being constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material that is the same as the material in the first foam pad 110. The second foam pad 112 is radially partitioned into individual and independent segments 114. The independent segments 114 are nested with respect to each other such that the nested segments 114 have side surfaces 116 in slidable direct contacting engagement with side surfaces 116 of adjacent nested segments 114. The second foam pad 112 has a top surface 112a attached to the bottom surface 110b of the first foam pad 110.
The segments 114 are in the form of a plurality of side-by-side, vertically oriented, slender foam columns or segments 114 that have substantially less sidewise stiffness than a solid foam portion. The resulting sidewise stiffness is lessened if the columns 114 are made longer, or made more slender even though that results in more columns 114 to fill the same area. The foam material of the segments 114 is preferably the same material as the rest of the first foam pad 110, although another foam material may be substituted if the other material still is capable of exhibiting a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%. To make sure the segments 114 stay together during a compressive impact the second foam pad 112 and/or segments 114 are tightly surrounded by a generally inelastic cord made of a high strength, low elongation material such as KEVLAR®. The second foam pad 112 has a length or height and the cord 118 is positioned generally in the middle of the length or height.
The subliner element of the third type 20 further includes a third foam pad 120 constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material which is the same material as the first foam pad 110. The third foam pad 120 is generally disk shaped and similarly shaped to the first foam pad 110. The third foam pad 120 has a top surface 120a and a bottom surface 120b. The top surface 120a of the third foam pad 120 is attached to the bottom surface 112b of the second foam pad 112. The bottom surface 120a of the third foam pad 120 is a substantially flat surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head 12 beneath it when the helmet 14 is worn. The bottom surface 120a of the third foam pad 120 forms the horizontal lower surface 20a, described above. The first, second and third foam pads 110, 112 and 120 are preferably secured together using a suitable adhesive that works well with foam. That is, the adhesive is preferably flexible in its cured condition to accommodate any stretching or compressing of the foam materials during an impact, as is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Preferably, the slender foam columns 114 in totality enable a sidewise relative displacement between the first and second foam pads 110, 112 of at least one-half inch in response to a sidewise force of less than 100 pounds. After an impact, the slender foam columns 114 are able to return the first and second foam pads 110, 112 to their pre-impact relative position.
Referring now to
The second embodiment of a subliner element of the third type 20′ further includes a second foam pad 112′ constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material having a top surface 112a′ and a bottom surface 112b′. The top surface 112a′ of the second foam pad 112′ is generally planar and has a second fluoropolymer layer or coating 124 adhered thereto. The first and second foam pads 110′, 112′ being positioned with the first and second fluoropolymer coatings 122, 124 in sliding facing engagement. The bottom surface 112b′ of the second foam pad 112′ is a substantially flat surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head 14 beneath it when the helmet 12 is worn. The bottom surface 112a′ of the second foam pad 112′ forms the horizontal lower surface 20a, described above. Both the first and second foam pads 110′, 112′ are generally disk shaped.
Each fluoropolymer layer 122, 124 is pre-treated on just one side to enable it to be strongly adhered to another surface. The adhering agent is an adhesive which is flexible in its cured condition to be able to accommodate any stretching or compressing of the foam materials during an impact. The first foam pad 110′ has a first side surface 110c′ extending between the top and bottom surfaces 110a′, 110b′. The second foam pad 112′ has a second side surface 112c′ extending between the top and bottom surfaces 112a′, 112b′. A first rib or band 126 is secured to the first side surface 110c′ of the first foam pad 110′. A second rib or band 128 is secured to the second side surface 112c′ of the second foam pad 112′. The upper and lower ribs 126, 128 surround the first foam pad 110′ and the second pad 112′, respectively, at near the mid height of each first side surface 110c′ and second side surface 112c′. Each rib 124, 126 is preferably constructed of a polymeric material and has several holes 130 to accommodate metal pins 132 which are long enough to hold each of the ribs 126, 128 in place by being embedded in the foam. Preferably there would be between six and sixteen holes 130 and pins 132 to properly secure each rib 126, 128 to the underlying foam portion.
A biasing element extends between the first and second ribs 126, 128 to force the first and second fluoropolymer coatings 122, 124 toward each other. That is, preassembled onto the ribs 126, 128 before they are pinned into place are a plurality of small elastomer bands 134 spaced around periphery of the first and second foam pads 110′, 112′. Preferably there would be a total of eighty to one hundred sixty elastomer bands 134 distributed around the circumference, each one being stretched between the upper and lower ribs 126, 128. And preferably, each elastomer band 134 is pre-twisted one time between the upper and lower ribs 126, 128 so that the two free lengths of each elastomer band 134 are equal. The free length being that section of an elastomer band 134 stretched around the upper and lower ribs 126, 128. The first and second fluoropolymer coatings 122, 124 are biased toward each other by a force applied to the first and second foam pads 110′, 112′ as result of the elastomer bands 134.
The material of the elastomer band 134 should have an elastic elongation capability of greater than 100% to be able to elastically accommodate the required stretch of their free lengths as the first and second fluoropolymer coatings 122, 124 slide relative to each other in response to an impact. Then after an impact the elastomer bands 134 return the first and second foam pads 110′, 112′ to their pre-impact relative position.
Referring now to
The subliner element of the third type 20 should be thick enough not to compress all the way to its full densification condition under a peak normal impact force which could easily reach, and possibly even exceed, a thousand pounds. Although the weight of a full helmet would likely be substantially less than that (being typically under five pounds), if all the helmet weight were to be required to be supported by the subliner element of the third type 20, with its high dynamic stiffness designed to accommodate a dynamic force of over a thousand pounds, the supporting area around point b for a static force of just five pounds could be so small that the supporting pressure could be uncomfortably high for the wearer were it not for the subliner elements of the second type 18, shown in third area C.
Subliner elements of the second type 18, located in third area C, would preferably be made of a much more compliant material than that used for the subliner element of the third type 20, preferably at least five times more compliant and perhaps more than an order of magnitude more compliant than the stiffer materials recommended for subliner element of the third type 20. Such a material could be an extra soft polyurethane foam such as LAST-A-FOAM®, EF-4003 by General Plastics Manufacturing Company, or EZ-Dri foam by Crest Foam Industries, both having, a relatively flat static and dynamic compression stress vs. deflection characteristic (the former 2.6 psi at 10%, 2.7 psi at 20%, 2.8 psi at 30%, 3.0 psi at 40%, and 3.4 psi at 50% and the latter 0.3 psi at 10%, 0.35 psi at 20%, 0.4 psi at 30%, 0.45 psi at 40% and 0.55 psi at 50%), so when incorporating the proper total area to accomplish the function of supporting the full weight or nearly the full weight of the helmet with the latter material enabling about five times the support area for extreme comfort, the exact location and thickness of the subliner elements of the second type 18 would not be that critical for the subliner elements of the second type 18 to be able to successfully support all, or almost all, of the weight of the helmet, yet contribute very little side force to the wearer's head 12 during an impact. However, the second type of subliner elements 18 are preferably positioned generally equidistantly about and between the first and third type of subliner elements 16, 20 in the third area C.
As stated previously, each embodiment of the subliner element of the third type 20, due to its flat horizontal lower surface 20a, typically does not impart a significant horizontal force to the wearer's head 12. The following description of the first embodiment of the subliner element of the third type 20, is equally applicable to the second and third embodiments of the subliner element of the third type 20′ 20″. There may be certain impacts during which the lower surface 20a of the subliner element of the third type 20 would not remain flat but instead would tend to cup around the surface of the wearer's head 12. One such type of impact is obvious: a direct downward impact to the crown, or top, of the helmet 14, centered toward the center of gravity (e.g.) of the wearer's head 12. Although that type of impact would result in cupping the lower surface of subliner element of the third type 20 around the wearer's head 12, little or no horizontal force would be imparted to the wearer's head 12.
Another impact case that could cup the lower surface of the subliner element of the third type 20 might be a downward impact to the top of the helmet at a point located away from the crown and generally directed toward the body of the wearer. Picture a running back diving over the goal line, his helmet getting struck in midair by the shoulder pad of a linebacker diving the other way to stop him. Here, in addition to a significant downward force through the subliner element of the third type 20 (downward here meaning downward toward the body of the running back), there could be a not-insignificant horizontal force (horizontal here meaning horizontal relative to the body of the running back) imparted to the running back's head through subliner element of the third type 20, as well as through the subliner elements of the first type 16; for the most part the former would tend to rotate point b on the running back's head about the aforementioned upper pivot point toward the impact location, while the latter would tend to rotate point b about the aforementioned lower pivot point away from the impact location. So even in this case where the subliner element of the third type 20 cannot avoid imparting a horizontal (sideways) force, the structure of the total subliner system 10 still tends to cancel the above two rotational head motions and thereby reduce the resultant angular acceleration of the wearer's head 12.
Further reductions of imparted torque levels can be achieved by lowering the impact force levels, which can be accomplished by a proper choice of material for the subliner elements of the first type 16, and by including specific structural features in the subliner elements of the first type 16. Especially during an impact involving mostly a horizontal force component, only about one third of the subliner elements of the first type 16 (those located in the wide general region beneath the impact point) would be imparting most of the side normal force and side tangential force to the wearer's head 12 since the remaining subliner elements of the first type 16 would have tended to move away from the wearer's head 12 during the impact as the force-imparting subliner elements of the first type 16 compress and/or flex as a result of the high impact forces. The force levels could be of the same order of magnitude as those potentially experienced by the subliner element of the third type 20 (up to, and perhaps even more than a thousand pounds), and so the same energy absorbing viscoelastic foam materials cited for subliner element of the third type 20 would be in order for subliner elements of the first type 16, where their high energy absorption capability will help reduce the level of the high impact forces. The radial (thickness) dimension of the subliner elements of the first type 16 should be of sufficient length and have sufficient area to be able to avoid full densification at the maximum expected peak dynamic impact force, which could still be in the thousand-pound range for the total aggregate number of forces imparted on the subliner elements of the first type 16. On average the radial thickness of the subliner elements of the first type 16 would be approximately 0.25 to 1.25 inches, and preferably 0.75 inches in a two shell case, and approximately 1.0 to 2.0 inches, and preferably 1.5 inches in a single shell case.
In a preferred embodiment, to increase lateral compliance to help further reduce the imparted tangential side forces, the subliner elements of the first type 16 may be partitioned into multiple segments or columns which emanate in a substantially perpendicular direction from the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24. The partitioning may be in the form of like-shaped segments having a particular cross-sectional shape, or it could be in the form of different shaped segments, as for instance an outer square cross-sectional shaped segment 36 having a centered circular cutout 38, along with a circular cross-sectional segment 40 to fill the circular cutout space, see
Referring still to
With continued reference to
All the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 are firmly attached to both the outer surface of the inner shell 24 and the inner surface of the outer shell 46. By contrast, subliner elements of the first, second and third types, 16, 18, 20 in the subliner system 10 can only be attached to the inner shell 24 (they cannot be attached to a wearer's head). The firm attachment of the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 to both the inner and outer shells 24, 46 enables liner elements 50 to experience not just high compression forces, but high shear forces and high tensile forces as well. As a result, the attachment requirement here is beyond the capability of a standard hook and loop fastener and is more in the realm of a high strength, wide temperature range, flexible adhesive, such as LOCTITE® 4902, or LOCTITE® Plastic Bonder, both by Henkel Corporation. The former is a one-part adhesive, the latter a two-part adhesive, and both are quick curing.
These flexible, high strength attachments make it possible for all the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 to participate in mitigating any impact to the wearer's head 12, regardless of the impact's location or direction. That mitigation is accomplished through the widespread positioning of the liner elements 50 and their ability to efficiently absorb energy in three different modes: compression, shear, and tension. For example, for any centered impact the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 generally located in the region beneath the impact will experience compression, those located to the side of the impact will experience shear, and those located opposite the impact will experience tension, while those located in between will experience some combination of compression, shear, and tension. For any non-centered impact most of the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 will experience a higher degree of shear. Because every impact is different in its location and direction, each liner element 50 in the second liner 44 must be able to absorb energy at all the expected possible levels of compression, shear, and tension, and combinations thereof.
Furthermore, in order to even be in a position of optimally absorbing energy, each liner element 50 of the second liner 44 must become deformed during an impact to its full extent by the outer shell 46, not just those liner elements 50 beneath the impact, but those to the side of the impact, and those opposite the impact as well, and the outer shell 46 must remain rigid enough during the impact to be able to accomplish that. Because the outer shell 46 is relatively thin and typically made of a polycarbonate or high impact ABS, this requires that the outer shell 46 be rigidized, especially near its opening to accommodate a wearer's head 12, which is the place where it is the weakest. Notice in the figure, that there are two molded-in internal rings 52 near the opening to accomplish the rigidizing, but other rigidizing approaches such as severe contouring or metal banding (not shown) would also be acceptable.
Achieving the optimum energy absorption by all the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 also requires they be fabricated of a material having an inherent high energy absorbing capability, and that the material also have a proper level of dynamic stiffness for the total second liner element 50 footprint area. To meet these criteria, the liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 may be fabricated from the same list of materials recommended for subliner elements of the first and third types 16, 20, the list including: a vinyl nitrile foam such as IMPAX® VN600, VN740, or VN1000 by Dertex Corporation, or a polyurethane foam such as LAST-A-FOAM® FP 8015 by General Plastics Manufacturing Company. However, in block form, each material likely presents too much dynamic stiffness in shear as compared to its dynamic stiffness in compression and tension. So to reduce a second liner element's dynamic stiffness in shear, without at the same time reducing its dynamic stiffness in compression or tension, partitioning of each liner element 50 into discrete adjacent segments is preferred, somewhat similar to what has been previously discussed for subliner elements of the first type 16, but even more so for the second liner elements 50 because the potential shear levels experienced by the second liner elements 50 are greater.
The cross-sectioning of the second liner elements 50 in
In general, the segment boundaries of the liner elements 50 (all formable by a “cookie cutter type slicer”) would be oriented in a substantially radial direction (from the standpoint of the wearer's head 12, or the outer shell 46, etc.) but most can never be oriented exactly in the radial direction, in part due to the extended width dimensions of a liner elements 50. Nevertheless, for simplification purposes, this specification will still be referred to them as “radial.” During an impact that results in a shearing motion of the liner elements 50, at least some of the adjacent segment surfaces may move relative to each other along their boundaries where the nano tape 39 is located in the radial direction to form S curves (not shown), and through dynamic friction to thereby provide some additional energy absorption. The use of the nano tape 39 increases the dynamic friction between adjacent moving segments resulting in greater energy absorption. The concept of absorbing energy through adjacent surfaces moving relative to each other to form S curves is fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,032,558 but without nano tape, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The addition of nano tape results in greater energy absorption and is thus an improvement.
Finally, although only a first preferred embodiment having a subliner system 10, and a second preferred embodiment having a subliner system 10 and an outer shell system 48 have been described in significant detail, the addition of a third liner and a third shell (not shown) would still be within the scope of the present disclosure. It will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, or modifications could be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the disclosure. Therefore, it should be appreciated that the present disclosure is not limited to the particular use or particular embodiments disclosed but is intended to cover all uses and all embodiments within the scope or spirit of the described disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2835313 | Dodge | May 1958 | A |
3425061 | Webb | Feb 1969 | A |
3577562 | Holt | May 1971 | A |
3877076 | Summers et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3943572 | Aileo | Mar 1976 | A |
4290149 | Aileo | Sep 1981 | A |
4307471 | Lovell | Dec 1981 | A |
4345338 | Frieder, Jr. et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4534068 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4586200 | Poon | May 1986 | A |
5030501 | Colvin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5204998 | Liu et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5589016 | Hoopingarner et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5713082 | Bassette et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5815846 | Calonge | Oct 1998 | A |
5956777 | Popovich | Sep 1999 | A |
5970550 | Gazes | Oct 1999 | A |
6070271 | Williams | Jun 2000 | A |
6070905 | Renault | Jun 2000 | A |
6219850 | Halstead et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6298497 | Chartrand | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308490 | Saebi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324700 | McDougall | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6453476 | Moore, III | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6658671 | Von Holst et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6871525 | Withnall et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6934971 | Ide et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6968575 | Durocher | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7240376 | Ide et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7367898 | Hawkins et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7461726 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7603725 | Harris | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7676854 | Berger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7774866 | Ferrara | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802320 | Morgan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7832023 | Crisco | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7900279 | Kraemer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930771 | Depreitere et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7954177 | Ide et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7954178 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8015624 | Baldackin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8127373 | Fodemski | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8166574 | Hassler | May 2012 | B2 |
8191179 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8196226 | Schuh | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8347421 | Krueger | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365315 | Ortiz et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8387164 | Maddux et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402715 | Uhllg et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8578520 | Halldin | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8640267 | Cohen | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8931606 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8955169 | Weber et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9032558 | Leon | May 2015 | B2 |
9578917 | Cohen | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9975032 | Frey | May 2018 | B2 |
10869520 | Leon | Dec 2020 | B1 |
11547166 | Leon | Jan 2023 | B1 |
20010031350 | Day et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020023291 | Mendoza | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056521 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030140400 | Ho | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040117896 | Madey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040250340 | Piper et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050246824 | Berger et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060031978 | Pierce | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059606 | Ferrara | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070170 | Copeland et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112477 | Schneider | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070068755 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080066217 | Depreitere et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120764 | Sajic | May 2008 | A1 |
20080155735 | Ferrara | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080256685 | Lampe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090000377 | Shipps et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024406 | Rawls-Meehan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090151056 | Desjardins et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090218185 | Lin | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265839 | Young et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090320185 | Hassler | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005573 | Rudd et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100299812 | Maddux et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319109 | Field | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110072587 | Cao et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107503 | Morgan | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117310 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131695 | Maddux et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110171420 | Yang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110252544 | Abernethy | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271427 | Milsom | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277221 | Ide et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120047635 | Finiel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096631 | King et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120143526 | Benzel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151663 | Rumbaugh | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151664 | Kirshon | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120186002 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186003 | Heger et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192337 | Divine et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198604 | Weber et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198605 | Maddux et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204329 | Faden et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207964 | Faden et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208032 | Faden et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216339 | Nimmons et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233745 | Veazie | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120266365 | Cohen | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266366 | Ferrara | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120297525 | Bain | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304366 | Daoust | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120304367 | Howard et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317705 | Lindsay | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324634 | Coyle | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000016 | Hall et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130000017 | Szalkowski et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130000018 | Rudd et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007950 | Arai | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019384 | Knight | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019385 | Knight | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025031 | Laperriere et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025032 | Durocher et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025033 | Durocher et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036531 | Belanger et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130040524 | Halldin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130042397 | Halldin | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055488 | Garneau | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061371 | Phipps et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061372 | Goldstein | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061375 | Bologna et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130111654 | Gorsen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122256 | Kleiven et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130185837 | Phipps et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130254978 | McInnis et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130291289 | Szalkowski et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130340147 | Giles | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140013492 | Bottlang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020158 | Parsons et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140096311 | Halldin | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140170372 | Fink | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140196198 | Cohen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140196998 | Nauman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150000018 | Brandt | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150223546 | Cohen | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160021965 | Mayerovitch | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170065018 | Lindsay | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180249778 | Brandt et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190029352 | Sadegh et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101850638 | Oct 2010 | CN |
4226588 | Feb 1994 | DE |
1142495 | Oct 2001 | EP |
2530309 | Mar 2016 | GB |
2004032659 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2020236930 | Nov 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rowson et al., “Linear and Angular Head Acceleration Measurements in Collegiate Football,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vo. 131, 7 pages (Jun. 2009). |
Broglio et al., “Biomechanical Properties of Concussions in High School Football,” Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise; www.medscape.com, pp. 1-10, (Nov. 23, 2010). |
Greenwald et al., “Head Impact Telemetry System (HITSTM) for Measurement of Head Acceleration in the Field,” American Society of Biomechanics—2003 Annual Meeting, 2 pages. |
Daniel et al., “Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 6 pages (Feb. 15, 2012). |
ASTM F 1446-04, “Standard Test Methods for Equipment and Procedures Used in Evaluating the Performance Characteristics of Protective Hedgear,” ASTM International, pp. 1-11 (date: unknown). |
“Head Injuries in Football,” The New York Times, pp. 4 (Nov. 16, 2011). |
Rousseau et al., “A Comparison of Peak Linear and Angular Headform Accelerations Using Ice Hockey Helmets,” Journal of ASTM International; www.astm.org, vol. 6, No. 1, 11 pages (Feb. 20, 2009). |
Rowson et al., “Development for the STAR Evaluation System for Football Helmets: Integrating Player Head Impact Exposure and Risk of Concussion,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 11 pages (May 7, 2011). |
Rousseau et al., “The Influence of Deflection and Neck Compliance on the Impact Dynamics of a Hybrid III Headform,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 223, Part P: J. Sports Engineering and Technology, pp. 89-97 (Apr. 3, 2009). |
“2011 Concussion Report—End of Regular Season,” 4 pages (Jan. 10, 2012). |
Shipley, “Traumatic Brain Injury and Diffuse Axonal Injury,” Trial Image Inc.; www.trialimagestore.com, pp. 1-5 (Feb. 18, 2011). |
Newman et al., “A New Biomechanical Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Part 2—Results and Conclusions,” 11 pages, (date: unknown). |
King et al., “Is Head Injury Caused by Linear or Angular Acceleration?,” IRCOBI Conference, pp. 1-12 (Sep. 2003). |
NOCSAE Doc (ND) 001-11M11, “Standard Test Method and Equipment Used in Evaluating the Performance Characteristrics of Protective Headgear Equipment,” NOCSAE/National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, pp. 1-25 (Jan. 2012). |
NOCSAE Doc (ND) 002-11m11a, “Standard Performance Specification for Newly Manufactured Football Helmets,” NOCSAE/National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, pp. 1-6 (Feb. 2012). |
“NOCSAE receives $1.1M Research Grants to Advance Science of Sports Medicine,” 2 pages (Jun. 20, 2011). |
“Helmet Safety Group Approves Research Grants,” SFGate.com, 1 page (Jun. 18, 2011). |
Bartholet, “The Collision Syndrome,” Scientific American, pp. 68-71 (Feb. 2012). |
Kluger, “Headbanger Nation. Concussions are clobbering U.S. kids. Here's why,” Time Magazine, pp. 42-51 (Jan. 31, 2011). |
“Concussion,” Wikipedia, 17 pages (page last modified on May 21, 2012). |
“Frustoconical,” Wiktionary, N.p., n.d. Web. Aug. 4, 2015. |
“Frustum.” Wiktionary. N.p., n.d. Web. Aug. 4, 2015. |
“EZ Dri.” INOAC. INOAC, n.d. Web Mar. 2, 2016. |
“Outdoor Foam Cushion, Waterproof Foam, Patio Cushion, Furniture Cushions.” Outdoor Foam Cushion, Waterproof Foam, Patio Cushion, Furniture Cushions. N.p., n.d. Web Mar. 2, 2016. |
“Reticulated Polyurethane Foam”, Producer of Custom-Engineered Components, Products & Packaging, 4 pages (Oct. 2016). |
Qi, HJ and Boyce, MC, Stress-strain Behavior of Thermoplastic Polyurethane. Submitted to Mechanics of Materials. Submitted Dec. 2003, Revised Jul. 2004. |
Orringer, et al., Crash Padding Research, vol. 1, Material Mechanical Properties, Final Report, Accessed through the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering Medicine, 1986-87. |