Helmet

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12121095
  • Patent Number
    12,121,095
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 24, 2024
    7 months ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 22, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
A helmet which is to be worn on a head of a wearer. The helmet includes a shell adapted to surround a wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position. A subliner in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, includes at least one viscoelastic foam subliner element extending from the inner surface of the shell. The subliner element is radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and have major side surfaces. Some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure generally relates to a helmet whose purpose is to protect a wearer's head during a head impact. Extending radially outward from the wearer's head, the helmet may consist of one or multiple liner portions and one or multiple shell portions. Either way, there is typically a liner portion in contact with the wearer's head initially or during impact, that liner portion being herein defined as the subliner. The subliner may be comprised of individual subliner elements. The subliner is typically attached to an inner shell portion, the term inner having been added to unambiguously differentiate it from an outer shell portion in the case of a helmet with multiple shell portions. In helmets having just a single liner portion and a single shell portion, the liner portion would be the same as the subliner and the shell portion would be the same as the inner shell portion. In some helmets (typically hockey helmets) the inner shell portion may consist of individual shell segments. The subliner and inner shell portion together are herein defined as the helmet subliner system, and the present disclosure comprises an improved helmet subliner system, and an improved outer liner portion in the case of multiple shell helmets, to better protect the wearer from sustaining concussions and other head injuries.


Especially in multiple liner, multiple shell helmets, the subliner, as defined herein has been used primarily for obtaining the best fit and best comfort for the wearer. But as will be shown in this specification, the subliner, and more generally the subliner system may also be used to substantially improve the head protection performance of the helmet. The disclosure recognizes and takes advantage of the fact that all the forces that are applied to the wearer's head during a head impact are preferably applied through the subliner and its elements.


Recent postmortem brain investigations have found a high instance of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, in the donated brains of deceased NFL football players, many of whom had suffered debilitating symptoms during their lifetimes, including unexplained rage, extreme mood swings, and substantial cognitive degeneration, all of which may have begun years after their football playing ended. Current research shows that CTE can almost always be traced back to long term repetitive head impacts which may include both concussive and sub-concussive impacts. It is believed those impacts would have been characterized by a high level of head angular acceleration, sometimes called rotational acceleration.


To reduce a wearer's head rotational acceleration, an effective helmet design may combine two strategies: one, absorb maximum impact energy to lower the impact force and acceleration, and two, redirect the now lowered force further down on the wearer's head to reduce head rotational acceleration.


In U.S. Pat. No. 11,547,166 B1, subliner elements attached to the inner surface of a surrounding shell are confined to a headband area of a user's head as part of the second strategy. As part of the first strategy, the subliner elements contain individual viscoelastic foam segments and double-sided nano tape in between the foam segments, whereby the foam segments absorb impact energy mostly from the rapid compression of the foam, and the nano tape in between the foam segments absorbs impact energy primarily from the rapid bending of the foam segments. Bending can occur when the shell end of a subliner element is displaced transversely with respect to the head end of the subliner element. The bending stretches the foam side surfaces on their convex side and shortens them on their concave side so that the nano tape in between adjacent bending foam segments becomes sheared across its thickness and absorbs energy as a result. However, for a subliner element located beneath a direct impact, the foam segments merely compress, and do not bend. Thus, in this case, less energy is absorbed by the element's nano tape.


This inherent shortcoming is overcome in the present disclosure by means of a new configuration of viscoelastic foam segments and nano tape. The disclosed new configuration results in increased bending of the viscoelastic foam segments, and thereby increased energy absorption by the nano tape in between, not just when the subliner element is directly compressed with no transverse motion between its shell end and head end, but also in cases when previously there would have been some bending. It thus results in more energy absorption by the nano tape portion of a subliner element, regardless of where the subliner element is located relative to an impact.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Briefly stated, the present disclosure is directed to a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The helmet includes a shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material having inner and outer surfaces. The shell is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. A subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, includes at least one subliner element extending from the inner surface of the shell. The at least one subliner element being constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material. The at least one subliner element is radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces. At least some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween.


In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The head has a pair of eyebrows, a pair of ears, and an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head. The headband shaped area is approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide and has a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches above the eyebrows and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches above an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head. A top area centered about a top of the wearer's head encompassing approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches. A middle area of the head is defined between the headband area and the top area. The helmet includes a shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material. The shell has inner and outer surfaces and is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. A subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, includes a plurality of a first type of subliner elements extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the first type of subliner elements are adapted to be aligned with the headband area when the helmet is worn. The first type of subliner elements is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material. The first type of subliner elements is radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces. At least some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween. An apex type of subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the apex type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The apex type of subliner element is comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material and has a substantially flat lower surface which is substantially tangent to a surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn.


In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer. The head has a pair of eyebrows, a pair of ears, and an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head. The headband shaped area is approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide and has a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches above the eyebrows and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches above an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head. A top area centered about a top of the wearer's head encompassing approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches. A middle area of the head is defined between the headband area and the top area. The helmet includes a shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material. The shell has inner and outer surfaces and is adapted to surround at least a portion of the cranial part of wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn. A subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, includes a plurality of a first type of subliner elements extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the first type of subliner elements is adapted to be aligned with the headband area when the helmet is worn. The first type of subliner elements is constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material and is radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other. The panel-shaped segments have major side surfaces. At least some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween. An apex type of subliner element extends from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the apex type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn. The apex type of subliner element is comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material. The apex type of subliner element has a substantially flat lower surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn. An outer shell, comprised of a hard impact resistant material and having inner and outer surfaces, surrounds at least a portion of the inner shell. The inner surface of the outer shell being spaced from the outer surface of the inner shell at an initial pre-impact relative position. A plurality of outer liner elements are located in the space between the outer surface of the inner shell and the inner surface of the outer shell and are attached to both the outer surface of the inner shell and the inner surface of the outer shell. At least one of the outer liner elements is comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam and is radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other. The panel-shaped segments have major side surfaces. At least some of the nested segments of the at least one outer liner element have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments of the at least one outer liner element are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed analysis of the physical principles and detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiments will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the disclosure, particular arrangements and methodologies of preferred embodiments are shown in the drawings. It should be understood, however, that the disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangements or instrumentalities shown or the methodologies of the detailed description. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a perspective side view of a wearer's head with defined areas, planes, and points in accordance with the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a perspective upper side view of a wearer's head showing the three types of subliner elements as they would be located in their respective designated areas, in accordance with a first embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2A is a perspective upper side view of a wearer's head showing the three types of subliner elements as they would be located in their respective designated areas, in accordance with a second embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view of a first type of subliner element;



FIG. 3A is a side elevational view of an assembled first type of subliner element;



FIG. 3B is a side elevational view of the assembled first type of subliner element being compressed by an impact where the compression is approximately 25%;



FIG. 3C is a side elevational view of the assembled first type of subliner element being compressed by an impact where the compression is over 50%;



FIG. 4 is cross-sectional side view at the midsagittal plane of a wearer's head, showing the subliner elements of FIG. 2 and the inner shell to which they are attached forming a subliner system in accordance with the present disclosure;



FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view showing the inner shell of FIG. 4 positioned on a wearer's head;



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional side view at the midsagittal plane of a wearer's head, of a two liner, two shell helmet embodiment, where the subliner elements and the inner shell shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 make up a subliner system, to which is added a second liner and an outer shell, the second liner being attached to both the inner shell and the outer shell in accordance with the present disclosure;



FIG. 7 is a left side elevational view showing the outer shell of FIG. 6 positioned on a wearer's head; and



FIG. 8 is a left side elevational view of a wearer's head showing a face guard attached to the outer shell of FIG. 7, and a chin strap positioned on the wearer's chin and attached to the inner shell of FIG. 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “lower,” “bottom,” “upper” and “top” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “inwardly,” “outwardly,” “upwardly” and “downwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the helmet, and designated parts thereof, in accordance with the present disclosure. Unless specifically set forth herein, the terms “a,” “an” and “the” are not limited to one element, but instead should be read as meaning “at least one.” The terminology includes the words noted above, derivatives thereof and words of similar import. The terms “angular acceleration” and “rotational acceleration” should be taken as synonymous from a force vector perspective. Similarly, the words “acceleration” and “deceleration” should also be taken as synonymous from a force vector perspective. It should also be understood that the terms “about,” “approximately,” “generally,” “substantially” and like terms, used herein when referring to a dimension or characteristic of a component of the disclosure, indicate that the described dimension/characteristic is not a strict boundary or parameter and does not exclude minor variations therefrom that arc functionally similar. At a minimum, such references that include a numerical parameter would include variations that, using mathematical and industrial principles accepted in the art (e.g., rounding, measurement or other systematic errors, manufacturing tolerances, etc.), would not vary the least significant digit.


Referring now to FIGS. 1, 2 and 4, to best understand the configuration of the helmet subliner system or subliner 10, which is a subject of this disclosure, it will be useful to first define certain areas of a potential wearer's head 12 which could come in contact with various types of subliner elements of the helmet 14. In this regard, all the following will be defined: first area A, first plane Al, second plane B1, point b, second area B, and third area C.



FIG. 1 is a perspective side view of a wearer's head 12 having a pair of eyebrows 26 (only one is shown) and a pair of cars 28 (only one is shown). The head 12 includes a first area A, first plane Al, second plane B1, point b, second area B, and third area C. First area A is an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head 12. The first or headband shaped area A being approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide, and preferably approximately 1.0 inch wide, and having a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches, and preferably approximately 1.0 inch, above the eyebrows 26 and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches, and preferably approximately 0.5 inches, above a location where the cars 28 join the wearer's head 12 at the top or, stated differently, an upper junction of the cars 28 and the wearer's head 12. The first plane Al is a hypothetical plane defined by the lower edge of first area A. Picture second plane B1 as a lower cover of an imaginary hard cover book being balanced horizontally atop the wearer's head 12 while the wearer's head 12 is maintained in an upright position, tilted neither right nor left, nor forward nor backward and where point b is approximately the center of the contact area between the lower cover of the imaginary book and the wearer's head 12. Notice that first plane Al is tilted upward in the forward direction (the direction toward the face of the wearer) relative to second plane B. In FIG. 1, the second plane B1 is shown as transparent so that the contact area with the wearer's head 12, point b, is apparent. The second or top area B is formed by a planar projection of an approximate 2-inch diameter circle (not shown) formed in the second plane B1 centered about point b onto the wearer's head. That is, the second area B is generally circular and is centered about a top of the wearer's head 12 and extends 0.75 to 3 inches, and preferably 2 inches, in diameter in all lateral directions. As will be discussed, the second area B needn't be 2 inches in diameter, nor even circular. That is, the second area B can range from 0.44 to 7 square inches, or preferably 3.14 square inches. The third or middle area C is the area on the wearer's head 12 between first area A and second area B.


Referring again to FIGS. 1, 2 and 4 and as will be described in detail in subsequent sections of the specification, subliner elements of a first type 16 are to be located in the first area A; subliner elements of a second type 18 are to be considered optional since they don't substantially contribute to the rotational acceleration reduction capability of the helmet, only to its comfort and fit, but when included they are to be utilized in third area C, and a subliner element of an apex type 20 is to be used in second area B. Each type of subliner element 16, 18, 20 has its own specific physical characteristics in accordance with the purpose of the disclosure which is to be able to reduce the level of head angular acceleration imparted to a wearer's head 12 during a head impact, regardless of the location or direction of the impact. Each of the subliner elements 16, 18, 20 is to be attached to an inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24 of the helmet 14, preferably utilizing a commonly employed hook and loop type of fastener arrangement which allows for the simple assembly of, and changeout of, individual subliner elements 16, 18, 20 during a fitting process, with each subliner element 16, 18, 20 being positioned and sized in its thickness direction to best fit the size and shape of a wearer's head 12. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, that other fastening elements could be used to releasably secure the subliner elements 16, 18, 20 to the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24 of the helmet 14, such as a releasable adhesive (not shown).



FIG. 2 is a perspective upper side view of a wearer's head 12 showing the first, second and apex types of subliner elements 16, 18, 20 as they would be located in their respective designated areas shown in FIG. 1, in accordance with a first embodiment of the present disclosure. The individual subliner elements 16, 18, 20 are not attached to the wearer's head 12 (as could be falsely assumed from FIG. 2) but are merely illustrated in the figure where they would be located with respect to the wearer's head 12 when the helmet 14 is worn. Typically, they would be attached to the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24 of the helmet 14, as shown in FIG. 4, preferably utilizing a commonly employed hook and loop type of fastener arrangement, described below. Alternatively, subliner elements 18 may be similarly attached to the side surface of subliner element 20. The upper side viewpoint enables a fuller view of subliner element of the apex type 20, which is preferably disc or oval shaped, oriented generally in the second plane B1, and is centered about point b at the top, or crown, of the head 12. Subliner element of the apex type 20 has a flat (or nearly flat), horizontal (or nearly horizontal), lower surface 20a which may be either initially in contact with the wearer's head 12 or slightly spaced therefrom but may come into contact with the wearer's head 12 during an impact. Subliner element of the apex type 20 is shown here as a circular disc having a two-inch diameter to accommodate any misalignment of the center of the disc with the initial actual point of contact with a wearer's head 12 and to accommodate lateral displacements between the inner shell 24 and the wearer's head 12 during an impact. In general, the subliner element of the apex type 20 need not be circular, but it may be of any suitable contiguous shape typically having that approximate area or greater. The important thing is that its lower surface 20a be of sufficient area to enable the accommodations described above, and that it be predominately flat and horizontal such that it is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head 12 beneath it when the helmet 14 is worn.


To be able to appreciate why the lower surface 20a of subliner element of the apex type 20 is preferred to be flat and horizontal, one may perform a simple experiment with one's own hand and one's own head. First, using one's hand, firmly cup the top of one's head. Then while still firmly cupping the head, forcefully move the cupping hand's forearm forward and backward, and side to side, and notice how the head is forced into violent motion likely involving significant head angular accelerations. Next, repeat the experiment while the hand is held flat and horizontal. The result: almost no forced motion of the head, and thus no head angular acceleration.


The subliner element of the apex type 20, and also the subliner elements of the first type 16, are preferably made of relatively stiff, very energy absorbent, viscoclastic foam material, capable of exhibiting a compressive stress of 20 psi for a static compression of 50% and at least 50 psi for a dynamic impact type compression of 50%, for example a vinyl nitrile foam such as IMPAX®, VN600, VN740, or VN1000 by Dertex Corporation, or a polyurethane foam such as LAST-A-FOAM®, FP 8015 by General Plastics Manufacturing Company. The subliner element of the apex type 20 should be thick enough not to compress all the way to its full densification condition under a peak normal impact force which could easily reach, and possibly even exceed, a thousand pounds. Although the weight of a full helmet would likely be substantially less than that (being typically under five pounds), if all the helmet weight were to be required to be supported by the subliner element of the apex type 20, with its high dynamic stiffness designed to accommodate a dynamic force of over a thousand pounds, the supporting area around point b for a static force of just five pounds could be so small that the supporting pressure could be uncomfortably high for the wearer were it not for the subliner elements of the second type 18, shown in third area C. This assumes the subliner elements 16 are not supporting much of the helmet weight. Alternatively, the subliner element of the apex type 20, could be constructed as described in U.S. Pat. No. 11,641,904 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


Optional subliner elements of the second type 18, located in third area C, would preferably be made of a much more compliant material than that used for the subliner element of the apex type 20, preferably at least five times more compliant and perhaps more than an order of magnitude more compliant than the stiffer materials recommended for subliner element of the apex type 20. Such a material could be an extra soft polyurethane foam such as LAST-A-FOAM®, EF-4003 by General Plastics Manufacturing Company, or EZ-Dri foam by Crest Foam Industries, both having, a relatively flat static and dynamic compression stress vs. deflection characteristic (the former 2.6 psi at 10%, 2.7 psi at 20%, 2.8 psi at 30%, 3.0 psi at 40%, and 3.4 psi at 50% and the latter 0.3 psi at 10%, 0.35 psi at 20%, 0.4 psi at 30%, 0.45 psi at 40% and 0.55 psi at 50%), so when incorporating the proper total area to accomplish the function of supporting the full weight or nearly the full weight of the helmet with the latter material enabling about five times the support area for extreme comfort, the exact location and thickness of the subliner elements of the second type 18 would not be that critical for the subliner elements of the second type 18 to be able to successfully support all, or almost all, of the weight of the helmet, yet contribute very little side force to the wearer's head 12 during an impact. However, the second type of subliner elements 18 are preferably positioned generally equidistantly about and between the first and apex type of subliner elements 16, 20 in the third area C.



FIG. 2A shows a second embodiment of the present disclosure wherein there is at least one of an alternative optional second type of subliner element 18. That is, instead of a plurality of the second type of subliner elements 18 as shown in FIG. 2, the second type of subliner elements 18 in accordance with the second embodiment are instead formed as a single annular ring 18′. Using a single annular ring 18′ has the advantage of easier assembly and greater simplicity. As with the first embodiment the ring type subliner element 18′ may alternatively be attached to the side of subliner element 20. Otherwise, all other elements of the subliner system 10 of the second embodiment are identical to the first embodiment.



FIG. 1 schematically shows the cervical spine 13 and its seven cervical vertebrae labeled Atlas (C1), Axis (C2), C3, C4, C5, C6 and C7. For both centered (directed toward the center of gravity of a wearer's head) and non-centered impacts having a large horizontal force component, almost all the side forces (and torques) that would be imparted to a wearer's head 12 during an impact would be imparted through the subliner elements of the first type 16, which would be located, or substantially located, in first area A and generally evenly distributed/spaced thereabout. First area A places the point of application of these impact forces as close as possible to the head's two natural pivot points for angular acceleration: a lower pivot point 12a where the C7 cervical vertebrae (which can be located by the prominent bone at the base of the back of the neck) meets the T1 thoracic vertebrae, and an upper pivot point 12b where the C1 cervical vertebrae (the atlas bone) meets the paired occipital condyle projections of the skull to enable forward and backward rotation (a “yes” motion) of the head and where the atlas bone meets the C2 cervical vertebrae (the axis bone) enabling axial rotation (a “no” motion) and side-to-side rotation of the head, this latter pivot being located approximately just above and slightly in front of the car lobes. Thus, all the head angular accelerating torques imparted to the user's head during an impact would be kept as small as possible for a given force as a result of this lowest practical positioning of subliner elements of the first type 16.


As stated previously, the subliner element of the apex type 20, due to its flat horizontal lower surface 20a, typically does not impart a significant horizontal force to the wearer's head 12. Yet, there may be certain impacts during which the lower surface of the subliner element of the apex type 20 would not remain flat but instead would tend to cup around the surface of the wearer's head 12. One such type of impact is obvious: a direct downward impact to the crown, or top, of the helmet 14, centered toward the center of gravity (e.g.) of the wearer's head 12. Although that type of impact would result in cupping the lower surface of subliner element of the apex type 20 around the wearer's head 12, little or no horizontal force would be imparted to the wearer's head 12.


Another impact case that could cup the lower surface of the subliner element of the apex type 20 might be a downward impact to the top of the helmet at a point located away from the crown and generally directed toward the body of the wearer. Picture a running back diving over the goal line, his helmet getting struck in midair by the shoulder pad of a linebacker diving the other way to stop him. Here, in addition to a significant downward force through the subliner element of the apex type 20 (downward here meaning downward toward the body of the running back), there could be a not-insignificant horizontal force (horizontal here meaning horizontal relative to the body of the running back) imparted to the running back's head through the subliner element of the apex type 20, as well as through the subliner elements of the first type 16; for the most part the former would tend to rotate point b on the running back's head about the aforementioned upper pivot point toward the impact location, while the latter would tend to rotate point b about the aforementioned lower pivot point away from the impact location. So even in this case where the subliner element of the apex type 20 cannot avoid imparting a horizontal (sideways) force, the structure of the total subliner system 10 still tends to cancel the above two rotational head motions and thereby reduce the resultant angular acceleration of the wearer's head 12.


Further reductions of imparted torque levels can be achieved by lowering the impact force levels, which can be accomplished by a proper choice of material for the subliner elements of the first type 16, and by including specific structural features in the subliner elements of the first type 16. Especially during an impact involving mostly a horizontal force component, only about one third of the subliner elements of the first type 16 (those located in the wide general region beneath the impact point) would be imparting most of the side normal force and side tangential force to the wearer's head 12 since the remaining subliner elements of the first type 16 would have tended to move away from the wearer's head 12 during the impact as the force-imparting subliner elements of the first type 16 compress and/or flex as a result of the high impact forces.


The force levels could be of the same order of magnitude as those potentially experienced by the subliner element of the apex type 20 (up to, and perhaps even more than a thousand pounds), and so the same energy absorbing viscoelastic foam materials cited for subliner element of the apex type 20 would be in order for subliner elements of the first type 16, where their high energy absorption capability will help reduce the level of the high impact forces. The radial (thickness) dimension of the subliner elements of the first type 16 should be of sufficient length and have sufficient area to be able to avoid full densification at the maximum expected peak dynamic impact force, which could still be in the thousand-pound range for the total aggregate number of forces imparted on the subliner elements of the first type 16. On average the radial thickness of the subliner elements of the first type 16 would be approximately 0.25 to 1.25 inches, and preferably 0.75 inches.


In a preferred embodiment, to increase lateral compliance to help further reduce the imparted tangential side forces, the subliner elements of the first type 16 may be partitioned into radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments 34 nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces 36. More particularly, the panel-shaped segments 34 are generally flat and are generally rectangular or square shaped. The major side surfaces 36 are formed on both major sides of the panel-shaped segments 34. The panel-shaped segments 34 include four minor side surfaces 38 between the major side surfaces 36 which are relatively thin compared to the major side surfaces 36. In order to best achieve the goal of reduced imparted side forces, the major side surfaces 36 of the side-by-side panel-shaped segments 34 should be at least partially able to slide relative to each other in the segments' general radial direction. That is, at least some of the nested segments 34 have double-sided nano tape segments 39 positioned between the major side surfaces 36 thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape 39 and at least some of the major side surfaces 36 of the remaining nested segments 34 are in direct facing relation without nano tape 39 therebetween. More particularly, it is preferred that the double-sided nano tape 39 be positioned between at least a majority of the facing major side surfaces 36 of the panel-shaped segments 34 except for two of the panel-shaped segments generally centrally positioned in the first subliner element 16.


As shown in FIG. 3, there are preferably a total of eight panel-shaped segments 34, with the two innermost or central panel-shaped segments in direct contact without nano tape 39 therebetween. The remaining panel-shaped segments 34 have nano tape 39 positioned therebetween. Each panel-shaped segment 34 preferably extends between 10 mm to 50 mm in one planar direction, between 10 mm to 50 mm in the other planar direction, and the panel thickness is preferably between 1.5 mm and 7.5 mm. The number of panels that make up one subliner element is preferably, but not necessarily, an even number, such as four, six, eight, or ten, etc. FIG. 3 shows a case with eight panel-shaped segments. Double-sided nano tape segments preferably with a thickness between 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm, preferably substantially fill the major side surfaces 36 between adjacent viscoclastic foam panel segments 34 with one key exception, the exception being the area between the foam panel segments 34 at or near the middle of the stack. In a pre-impact condition, the interior major side surfaces 36 of the middle two foam panel segments 34 are located side-by-side without nano tape 39 filling the space between them. For example, with eight panel-shaped segments 34, there would be only six nano tape segments 39, not seven. Three of the nano tape segments 39 would be located between panel-shaped segments 34 numbered 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4, respectively, making up one half of the first type of subliner element 16, and the other three nano tape segments 39 would be located between panel-shaped segments 34 numbered 5 and 6, 6 and 7, and 7 and 8, respectively, making up the other half of the first type of subliner element 16. No nano tape segment is located between panels 4 and 5.


It will be understood by those skilled in the art that nano tape 39 may be any nano tape which is commercially available. In general, nano tape 39 is an clastic tape that includes a nanofiber or nanotube structure which adheres to an adjacent surface due to molecular Van der Waals forces. In one embodiment, the nano tape 39 is comprised of carbon nanotube arrays provided on a backing layer formed of a flexible polymer, such as polyurethane, with Van der Waals interactions occurring between the carbon nanotube arrays and individual nanotubes and the adjacent surface. The nano tape is in the range of 0.5 to 2.0 mm thick and most preferably 1.0 mm thick.


While the preferred embodiment discloses eight panel-shaped segments 34, the present disclosure is not so limited. Any number of panel-shaped segments 34 could be used depending on the size of the helmet and size of the user. Similarly, while it is preferred the two inner most panel-shaped segments 34 be in direct contact without nano-tape therebetween, additional panel-shaped segments 34 could also be in direct contact without nano-tape therebetween.


With continued reference to FIG. 3, a mounting plate 40 is affixed to one end of the first type of subliner element 16 and extends generally perpendicular to the major side surfaces 36 of the panel-shaped segments 34. The mounting plate 40 is positioned between the first type of subliner element 16 and the shell 24. The minor side surfaces 38 of the panel-shaped segments 34 that face the inner shell 24 are permanently adhered to one side of the mounting plate 40 using a suitable flexible adhesive to form an assembled first type of subliner element 16. This maintains the two nano tape assembled halves 16a, 16b of the first type of subliner element 16 in proper alignment at the free minor side surfaces 38. The mounting plate 40 is preferably flexible and made of an clastic impact resistant polymer such as ABS having a thickness preferably between 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm.


A hook part 30 and a loop part 32 of a hook and loop fastener mechanism is used to secure the first type of subliner element 16 to the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24. The hook part 30 and loop part 32 are preferably of a type in common usage today for such applications. More specifically, the surface of the mounting plate 40 opposite the first type of subliner element 16 has one of a hook or loop portion of the hook and loop fastener mechanism secured thereto enabling the assembled first type of subliner element 16 to be removably affixed to the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24 of the helmet to which the other of hook or loop portion of the hook and loop fastener system is adhered. The perimeter of mounting plate 40 preferably extends beyond the area of the adhered first type of subliner element 16 to maximize the ability of the hook and loop fastener mechanism to firmly hold the assembled first type of subliner element 16 in place during use, including during impacts. The end of the first type of subliner element 16 opposite the mounting plate 40 is referred to as the head end 43.


Referring to FIGS. 3A-3C, during an impact involving significant compression of the first type of subliner element 16, the two subliner halves 16a, 16b are able to bulge away from each other, this bulging being accompanied by localized bending within each of the two subliner element halves 16a, 16b, primarily near their midpoint between the mounting plate 40 and the head end 43.


The first type of subliner element 16 further includes an elastic element 41 surrounding at least a portion of the first type of subliner element 16 between the mounting plate 40 end and a head end 43 of the first type of subliner element 16 opposite the mounting plate 40. The clastic element 41 preferably has a radial length which is at least 50% of a length of the panel-shaped segments 34 between the mounting plate 40 and the head end 43 of the first type of subliner element 16 opposite the mounting plate 40.


The clastic element 41 is preferably in the form of a thin clastic sheet that surrounds the assembled first type of subliner 16 in a region between the mounting plate 40 and the head end 43 of the first type of subliner element 16 to hold the two first type of subliner halves 16a, 16b together prior to an impact, and to return the subliner halves 16a, 16b to their pre-impact condition following an impact. The radial length of the clastic element 41 should preferably cover at least 25% to 75%, and preferably about 25%, of the distance between the mounting plate 40 and the head end 43 of the first type of subliner element 16. The clastic element 41 should preferably have an elongation capability of at least fivefold because in the first type of subliner element's 16 pre-impact condition shown in FIG. 3A, the clastic element 41 should be at least somewhat stretched to firmly hold the two subliner element halves 16a, 16b together. During an impact, the clastic element 41 may need to stretch up to another threefold at its maximum stretch location approximately midway between the mounting plate 40 and the head end 43. Natural rubber, or latex, has the property of being able to stretch at least sixfold, so latex may be at least one preferred material for the clastic element 41.



FIG. 3A shows the exploded elements of FIG. 3 assembled into a first type of subliner element 16 in an un-impacted state. The mounting plate 40 is shown at the bottom, and the line at the top represents the head end 43 in contact with the wearer's head.



FIG. 3B shows the first type of subliner element 16 shown in FIG. 3A as it is being compressed by a high-speed impact, represented by the arrows 47, in which the level of compression has reached approximately 25%, which can typically occur in just 3 or 4 milliseconds. In this case, the two halves 16a, 16b of the first type of subliner element 16 have separated at the middle to form a central opening 45 and causing bending of the panel-shaped segments 34 as a result of that separation. The very rapid bending of the viscoelastic panel-shaped segments 34 causes a localized portion of the nano tape 39 surface in fixed contact with a localized convex portion of the major side surface 36 of panel-shaped segment 34 to rapidly elongate compared to the opposite surface of the nano tape 39 segment in fixed contact with a localized portion of the concave major side surface 36 of panel-shaped segment 34 which is rapidly shortening. This results in rapid shearing across the very thin thickness of the localized nano tape 39 and coupled with the high effective viscosity of the nano tape matrix material, this results in localized areas of significant nano tape energy absorption. There is also some energy absorption as a result of the compression of the viscoelastic panel-shaped segments 34, at the top and bottom, and somewhat lesser energy absorption in the viscoclastic panel-shaped segment 34 as a result of the bending.



FIG. 3C shows the first type of subliner element 16 of FIG. 3B after an additional 5 milliseconds have passed when its compression has now reached more than 50%. In this case, the inner panel-shaped segments 34 now display more severe localized bending mid span, and how the outer panel-shaped segments 34 display less severe bending but over a more spread-out, less localized, area. This shows that the energy absorption from the nano tape 39 has continued at a similar level as before as a result of the more but less rapid bending, as indicated by the longer time span. The center opening 45 still exists and the folded-over viscoelastic panel-shaped segments 34 are now differently oriented and present a greater area for resisting additional compression. The over 50% compression point is where normally a straight compressing viscoclastic foam block would enter its densification region where the force would begin to go up exponentially with additional compression. Densification is the last stage of compression for a foam material where all the spaces are gone and only solid material remains to be compressed. But here, the center opening 45, the reoriented panel-shaped segments 34, and the greater compression area all combine to help avoid densification and its damaging higher forces and accelerations, including rotational accelerations. Along with the additional nano tape energy absorption, avoiding densification is another major advantage of the disclosed subliner configuration.


Although FIGS. 3B and 3C show a straight compression situation, the first type of subliner element 16 deforms similarly under a combination of compression and shear, with the shear tending to alter the symmetrical nature of the deformation shown in the figures. However, there is still substantial energy absorption from both compression and bending of the viscoelastic panel-shaped segments 34 and substantial energy absorption in the nano tape 39 segments as a result of the bending of the panel-shaped segments 34. In addition, all three conditions cited above for reducing the chance of densification still apply.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional side view located at the midsagittal plane of the wearer's head 12 showing the three types of subliner elements 16, 18, 20 as located in FIG. 2 and the inner shell 24 to which they are attached. The inner shell 24 may be part of a single liner, single shell helmet 14 as illustrated in the figure, or it may be part of a multiple liner, multiple shell helmet, as discussed in more detail below. The relative size of the inner shell 24 shown in FIG. 4 at the lower end of the indicated radial thickness range would be consistent with the former case if the helmet were for example an equestrian helmet or a ski helmet, and the relative size of the inner shell shown in FIG. 4 would also be consistent with the latter case if the helmet were for example a football helmet or a motorcycle helmet. A football helmet or a motorcycle helmet of the single liner, single shell type would typically have a larger subliner system 10 at the higher end of the indicated radial thickness range, which in that case would also be the outer shell. Thus, in a football helmet or motorcycle helmet of the single liner, single shell type embodiment, the radial spacing of the inner shell 24 from the head 12 would typically be greater than that shown in FIG. 4 and the subliner elements of the first, second and apex types 16, 18, 20 would accordingly have a greater radial dimension.


With continued reference to FIG. 4, the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24 above subliner element of the apex type 20 is shown to have a flat horizontal surface 42 rather than a concave surface. The inner shell 24 may be molded that way to achieve the flat horizontal surface 42. The flat horizontal surface 42 is not absolutely necessary but it is preferred to enable the apex type of subliner element 20 to be flat on its upper surface as well as its lower surface 20a, which helps to assure a horizontal lower surface 20a, and makes it simpler and more controllable to determine, select, and properly align and apply a proper thickness subliner element of the apex type 20 so that it's lower surface 20a remains horizontal and preferably barely touches the wearer's head 12. As shown in FIG. 4, the two cross-sectioned subliner elements of the second type 18 are shown in the third area C, properly radially compressed, as would be all of the other subliner elements of the second type 18 not shown in the cross-section, when all are supporting the full weight of the helmet, even though the full helmet with all its potential parts, including a potential face guard and a potential chin strap or jaw strap system, is not shown in FIG. 4. Finally, the subliner elements of the first type 16 in the first area A each have a thickness to yield a snug but not uncomfortable fit with the wearer's head 12.



FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view of the wearer's head 12 showing the inner shell 24 of FIG. 4 located over the wearer's head 12 with all the subliner elements of the first, second and apex type 16, 18, 20 positioned as shown in phantom and as in FIG. 2; all of the subliner elements of the first, second and apex type 16, 18, 20 being attached to the inner surface 22 of the inner shell 24, typically by the easy-on, easy-off, hook and loop fastener mechanism 30, 32 shown in FIG. 3. The easy-on, easy-off capability helps in being able to customize the helmet for an individual wearer. The potential materials to be used for the inner shell 24 would depend upon which embodiment it is being used in. In the single liner, single shell helmet embodiment the inner shell 24 (which is now also the outer shell) must be able to handle a direct impact, so an impact resistant material such as polycarbonate or high impact ABS would be appropriate. In the multiple liner, multiple shell helmet embodiment described in more detail below, the inner shell 24 need not handle a direct impact, but it still would need to be able to handle high forces so a high strength polymer composite containing either glass fibers, carbon fibers, or KEVLAR® fibers (commonly understood as heat-resistant and strong synthetic fibers) or a composite utilizing a combination of different fibers could be appropriate. Also, for this embodiment, the inner shell 24 could be constructed of a thin metal, such as stainless steel or an aluminum alloy (either perforated, or not perforated), and in large quantities could be fabricated by pressing it to shape in a die with a large machine press. Such a thin metal shell, perhaps a thirty-second of an inch or less in thickness, could weigh even less than a comparable polymer composite shell.



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional side view located at the midsagittal plane of a wearer's head 12, showing a two liner, two shell, helmet 14 embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 6 shows the subliner system 10 of FIG. 4, plus a second or outer liner 44 and a second or outer shell 46 which together form an outer shell system 48. Five outer liner elements 50 are shown in the second liner 44 because they cross the midsagittal plane. Typically, there may be ten to fifteen additional liner elements 50 in the second liner 44 which are not shown in FIG. 6 because they do not cross the midsagittal plane. That would add up to a likely total of fifteen to twenty total outer liner elements 50 in the second liner 44, spread out more or less equidistantly throughout the available space between the inner shell 24 and the second or outer shell 46.


All the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 are firmly attached to both the outer surface of the inner shell 24 and the inner surface of the outer shell 46. By contrast, subliner elements of the first, second and apex types, 16, 18, 20 in the subliner system 10 can only be attached to the inner shell 24 (they cannot be attached to a wearer's head). The firm attachment of the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 to both the inner and outer shells 24, 46 enables the outer liner elements 50 to experience not just high compression forces, but high shear forces and high tensile forces as well. As a result, the attachment requirement here is beyond the capability of a standard hook and loop fastener and is more in the realm of a high strength, wide temperature range, flexible adhesive, such as LOCTITE® 4902, or LOCTITE® Plastic Bonder, both by Henkel Corporation. The former is a one-part adhesive, the latter a two-part adhesive, and both are quick curing.


These flexible, high strength attachments make it possible for all the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 to participate in mitigating any impact to the wearer's head 12, regardless of the impact's location or direction. That mitigation is accomplished through the widespread positioning of the outer liner elements 50 and their ability to efficiently absorb energy in three different modes: compression, shear, and tension. For example, for any centered impact the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 generally located in the region beneath the impact will experience compression, those located to the side of the impact will experience shear, and those located opposite the impact will experience tension, while those located in between will experience some combination of compression, shear, and tension. For any non-centered impact most of the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 will experience a higher degree of shear. Because every impact is different in its location and direction, each outer liner element 50 in the second liner 44 must be able to absorb energy at all the expected possible levels of compression, shear, and tension, and combinations thereof.


Furthermore, in order to even be in a position of optimally absorbing energy, each outer liner element 50 of the second liner 44 must become deformed during an impact to its full extent by the outer shell 46, not just those outer liner elements 50 beneath the impact, but those to the side of the impact, and those opposite the impact as well, and the outer shell 46 must remain rigid enough during the impact to be able to accomplish that. Because the outer shell 46 is relatively thin and typically made of a polycarbonate or high impact ABS, this may require that the outer shell 46 be rigidized, especially near its opening to accommodate a wearer's head 12, which is the place where it is the weakest. Notice in the figure, that there are two molded-in internal rings 52 near the opening to accomplish the rigidizing, but other rigidizing approaches such as severe contouring or metal banding (not shown) would also be acceptable.


Achieving the optimum energy absorption by all the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 also requires they be fabricated of a material having an inherent high energy absorbing capability, and that the material also have a proper level of dynamic stiffness for the total outer liner element 50 footprint area. To meet these criteria, the outer liner elements 50 of the second liner 44 may be fabricated from the same list of materials recommended for subliner elements of the first and apex types 16, 20, the list including: a vinyl nitrile foam such as IMPAX® VN600, VN740, or VN1000 by Dertex Corporation, or a polyurethane foam such as LAST-A-FOAM® FP 8015 by General Plastics Manufacturing Company. However, in block form, each material likely presents too much dynamic stiffness in shear as compared to its dynamic stiffness in compression and tension. So to reduce an outer liner element's dynamic stiffness in shear, without at the same time reducing its dynamic stiffness in compression or tension, partitioning of each outer liner element 50 into discrete adjacent segments is preferred, similar to what has been previously discussed for the first type of subliner elements 16, panel-shaped segments 34 with nano tape 39 segments located therebetween, except there is no nano tape 39 segment between the middle two panel-shaped segments 34. The outer liner elements 50 located around the periphery of the helmet, in their pre-impact, installed condition should be preferably partially compressed, approximately 25% as shown in FIG. 3B, in order to be able to experience a sudden change in bonding during an impact, not only in compression, but also in tension as when the impact occurs opposite their location. That way the nano tape 39 is able to absorb energy when otherwise it would not. This is feasible for the oppositely located, peripheral outer liner elements 50a because the pre-impact forces they exert on the two shells cancel out. No such cancellation is possible for the outer liner elements 50b which are not located on the periphery. There is no opposite second liner element for these and they would be installed in an un-compressed condition as shown in FIG. 3A. There is no loss of function in doing so, as these inner outer liner elements 50b are not likely to experience tension during an impact.



FIG. 7 illustrates a left side elevational view showing the outer shell 46 of FIG. 6 positioned on a wearer's head 12. The size and shape of the outer shell 46 might be typical of a football helmet.



FIG. 8 is a left side elevational view of a wearer's head 12 showing a face guard 102 attached to the outer shell 46 of FIG. 8, and a chin strap 104 positioned on the wearer's chin and attached to the inner shell 24 of FIG. 5, both typical of a football helmet application.


Finally, although only a first preferred embodiment having a subliner system 10, and a second preferred embodiment having a subliner system 10 and an outer shell system 48 have been described in significant detail, the addition of a third liner and a third shell (not shown) would still be within the scope of the present disclosure. It will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, or modifications could be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the disclosure. Therefore, it should be appreciated that the present disclosure is not limited to the particular use or particular embodiments disclosed but is intended to cover all uses and all embodiments within the scope or spirit of the described disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer, the helmet comprising: a shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material, the shell having inner and outer surfaces, the shell adapted to surround at least a portion of a cranial part of wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn; anda subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, the subliner comprising:at least one subliner element extending from the inner surface of the shell, the at least one subliner element being constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material, the at least one subliner element being radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces;at least some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween.
  • 2. The helmet as recited in claim 1, wherein the panel-shaped segments are generally flat.
  • 3. The helmet as recited in claim 1, wherein the double-sided nano tape is positioned between at least a majority of the facing major side surfaces of the panel-shaped segments except for two of the panel-shaped segments generally centrally positioned in the subliner element.
  • 4. The helmet as recited in claim 3, further including a mounting plate affixed to one end of the subliner element and extending generally perpendicular to the major side surfaces of the panel-shaped segments, the mounting plate being positioned between the subliner element and the shell.
  • 5. The helmet recited in claim 4, further including an elastic element surrounding at least a portion of the subliner element between the mounting plate end and an end of the subliner element opposite the mounting plate.
  • 6. The helmet as recited in claim 5, wherein the elastic element has a length which is at least 25% of a length of the panel-shaped segments between the mounting plate and the end of the subliner element opposite the mounting plate.
  • 7. The helmet as recited in claim 1, wherein the nano tape is in a range of 0.5 to 2.5 mm thick.
  • 8. A helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer, the head having a pair of eyebrows and a pair of ears, the head having an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head, the headband shaped area being approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide and having a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches above the eyebrows and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches above an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head, a top area centered about a top of the wearer's head encompassing approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches, and a middle area of the head defined between the headband area and the top area, the helmet comprising: a shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material, the shell having inner and outer surfaces, the shell adapted to surround at least a portion of a cranial part of wearer's head with the inner surface of the shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn; anda subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, the subliner comprising: a plurality of a first type of subliner elements extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the first type of subliner elements are adapted to be aligned with the headband area when the helmet is worn, the first type of subliner elements being constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material, the first type of subliner elements being radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces, at least some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween; andan apex type of subliner element extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the apex type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn, the apex type of subliner element being comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material, the apex type of subliner element having a substantially flat lower surface which is substantially tangent to a surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn.
  • 9. The helmet as recited in claim 8 further including at least one of a second type of subliner element extending directly or indirectly from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the at least one of the second type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the middle area when the helmet is worn, the at least one of the second type of subliner element being constructed of a foam material, the at least one of the second type of subliner element being positioned between the plurality of the first type of subliner elements and the apex type of subliner element.
  • 10. The helmet as recited in claim 8, wherein the panel-shaped segments are generally flat.
  • 11. The helmet as recited in claim 8, wherein the double-sided nano tape is positioned between at least a majority of the facing major side surfaces of the panel-shaped segments except for two of the panel-shaped segments generally centrally positioned in the first type of subliner element.
  • 12. The helmet as recited in claim 11, further including a mounting plate affixed to one end of the first type of subliner element and extending generally perpendicular to the major side surfaces of the panel-shaped segments, the mounting plate being positioned between the subliner element and the shell.
  • 13. The helmet recited in claim 12, further including an elastic element surrounding at least a portion of the subliner element between the mounting plate end and an end of the subliner element opposite the mounting plate.
  • 14. The helmet as recited in claim 13, wherein the elastic element has a length which is at least 25% of a length of the panel-shaped segments between the mounting plate and the end of the subliner element opposite the mounting plate.
  • 15. The helmet as recited in claim 8, wherein the energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material of the first type of subliner elements is adapted to exhibit a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%, and the energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material of apex type of subliner element is adapted to exhibit a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%.
  • 16. The helmet as recited in claim 8, wherein the plurality of first type of subliner elements are generally evenly spaced throughout a circumference of the headband area.
  • 17. The helmet as recited in claim 8, wherein the first and apex type of subliner elements are releasably secured to the inner surface of the inner shell using hook and loop material.
  • 18. The helmet as recited in claim 8, wherein the nano tape is in a range of 0.5 to 2.5 mm thick.
  • 19. A helmet adapted to be worn on a head of a wearer, the head having a pair eyebrows and a pair of ears, the head having an annular headband shaped area encircling the wearer's head, the headband shaped area being approximately 0.75 to 1.25 inches wide and having a lower edge defining a plane positioned approximately 0.5 to 1.5 inches above the eyebrows and approximately 0.25 to 0.75 inches above an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head, a top area is centered about a top of the wearer's head encompassing approximately 0.44 to 7 square inches, and a middle area of the head defined between the headband area and the top area, the helmet comprising: an inner shell comprised of a hard material, the inner shell having inner and outer surfaces, the inner shell adapted to surround at least a portion of a cranial part of wearer's head with the inner surface of the inner shell being spaced from the wearer's head at an initial pre-impact relative position when the helmet is worn;a subliner, at least a part of which is adapted to be in contact with the wearer's head when the helmet is worn prior to an impact and during an impact, the subliner comprising: a plurality of a first type of subliner elements extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the first type of subliner elements are adapted to be aligned with the headband area when the helmet is worn, the first type of subliner elements being constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material, the first type of subliner elements being radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces; at least some of the nested segments have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween; andan apex type of subliner element extending from the inner surface of the shell at a location such that the apex type of subliner element is adapted to be aligned with the top area when the helmet is worn, the apex type of subliner element being comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material, the apex type of subliner element having a substantially flat lower surface which is substantially tangent to the surface of the wearer's head beneath it when the helmet is worn;an outer shell comprised of a hard impact resistant material, the outer shell having inner and outer surfaces, the outer shell surrounding at least a portion of the inner shell, the inner surface of the outer shell being spaced from the outer surface of the inner shell at an initial pre-impact relative position; anda plurality of outer liner elements located in the space between the outer surface of the inner shell and the inner surface of the outer shell and attached to both the outer surface of the inner shell and the inner surface of the outer shell wherein at least one of the outer liner elements is comprised of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam, the at least one outer liner element being radially partitioned into individual and independent panel-shaped segments nested with respect to each other and having major side surfaces; at least some of the nested segments of the at least one outer liner element have double-sided nano tape positioned between the major side surfaces thereof in direct contacting engagement with the nano tape and at least some of the major side surfaces of the remaining nested segments of the at least one outer liner element are in direct facing relation without nano tape therebetween.
  • 20. The helmet as recited in claim 19, wherein the panel-shaped segments are generally flat.
  • 21. The helmet as recited in claim 19 wherein in the first type of subliner element and the at least one outer liner element the double-sided nano tape is positioned between at least a majority of the facing major side surfaces of the panel-shaped segments except for two of the panel-shaped segments generally centrally positioned therein.
  • 22. The helmet as recited in claim 19, further including a mounting plate affixed to one end of the first type of subliner element and extending generally perpendicular to the major surface of the panel-shaped segments, the mounting plate being positioned between the first type of subliner element and the inner shell.
  • 23. The helmet as recited in claim 22, further including a mounting plate affixed to one end of the at least one outer liner element and extending generally perpendicular to the major surface of the panel-shaped segments thereof, the mounting plate being positioned between the at least one outer element and the outer shell.
  • 24. The helmet as recited in claim 23, further including an elastic element surrounding at least a portion of the first type of subliner element and the at least one outer liner element between the mounting plate end and an end of the first type of subliner element and at least one outer liner element opposite the mounting plate.
  • 25. The helmet as recited in claim 24, wherein the elastic element has a length which is at least 25% of a length of the panel-shaped segments between the mounting plate and the end of the first type of subliner element and at least one outer element opposite the mounting plate.
  • 26. The helmet as recited in claim 19, wherein the energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material of the first type of subliner elements and at least one outer element is adapted to exhibit a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%, and the energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material of apex type of subliner element is adapted to exhibit a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%.
  • 27. The helmet as recited in claim 19, wherein the first and apex type of subliner elements are releasably secured to the inner surface of the inner shell using hook and loop material.
  • 28. The helmet as recited in claim 19, wherein the nano tape is in the range of 0.5 to 2.5 mm thick.
US Referenced Citations (153)
Number Name Date Kind
2835313 Dodge May 1958 A
3425061 Webb Feb 1969 A
3577562 Holt May 1971 A
3872511 Nichols Mar 1975 A
3877076 Summers et al. Apr 1975 A
3943572 Aileo Mar 1976 A
4290149 Aileo Sep 1981 A
4307471 Lovell Dec 1981 A
4345338 Frieder, Jr. et al. Aug 1982 A
4534068 Mitchell et al. Aug 1985 A
4586200 Poon May 1986 A
5030501 Colvin et al. Jul 1991 A
5168576 Krent Dec 1992 A
5204998 Liu et al. Apr 1993 A
5589016 Hoopingarner et al. Dec 1996 A
5713082 Bassette et al. Feb 1998 A
5815846 Calonge Oct 1998 A
5950244 Fournier Sep 1999 A
5956777 Popovich Sep 1999 A
5970550 Gazes Oct 1999 A
6070271 Williams Jun 2000 A
6070905 Renault Jun 2000 A
6219850 Halstead et al. Apr 2001 B1
6298497 Chartrand Oct 2001 B1
6308490 Saebi Oct 2001 B1
6324700 McDougall Dec 2001 B1
6453476 Moore, III Sep 2002 B1
6658671 Von Holst et al. Dec 2003 B1
6871525 Withnall et al. Mar 2005 B2
6934971 Ide et al. Aug 2005 B2
6968575 Durocher Nov 2005 B2
7240376 Ide et al. Jul 2007 B2
7367898 Hawkins et al. May 2008 B2
7461726 Hawkins et al. Dec 2008 B2
7603725 Harris Oct 2009 B2
7673351 Copeland Mar 2010 B2
7676854 Berger et al. Mar 2010 B2
7774866 Ferrara Aug 2010 B2
7802320 Morgan Sep 2010 B2
7832023 Crisco Nov 2010 B2
7900279 Kraemer et al. Mar 2011 B2
7930771 Depreitere et al. Apr 2011 B2
7954177 Ide et al. Jun 2011 B2
7954178 Durocher et al. Jun 2011 B2
8015624 Baldackin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8127373 Fodemski Mar 2012 B1
8166574 Hassler May 2012 B2
8191179 Durocher et al. Jun 2012 B2
8196226 Schuh Jun 2012 B1
8347421 Krueger Jan 2013 B2
8365315 Ortiz et al. Feb 2013 B2
8387164 Maddux et al. Mar 2013 B2
8402715 Uhllg et al. Mar 2013 B2
8578520 Halldin Nov 2013 B2
8640267 Cohen Feb 2014 B1
8931606 Hawkins et al. Jan 2015 B2
8955169 Weber et al. Feb 2015 B2
9032558 Leon May 2015 B2
9578917 Cohen Feb 2017 B2
9975032 Frey May 2018 B2
10136691 Degolier Nov 2018 B2
10869520 Leon Dec 2020 B1
11547166 Leon Jan 2023 B1
20010031350 Day et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020023291 Mendoza Feb 2002 A1
20020056521 Chen et al. May 2002 A1
20030140400 Ho Jul 2003 A1
20040117896 Madey et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040250340 Piper et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050246824 Berger et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060031978 Pierce Feb 2006 A1
20060059606 Ferrara Mar 2006 A1
20060070170 Copeland et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060112477 Schneider Jun 2006 A1
20070068755 Hawkins et al. Mar 2007 A1
20080066217 Depreitere et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080120764 Sajic May 2008 A1
20080155735 Ferrara Jul 2008 A1
20080172779 Ferguson Jul 2008 A1
20080256685 Lampe et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090000377 Shipps et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024406 Rawls-Meehan Jan 2009 A1
20090151056 Desjardins et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090218185 Lin Sep 2009 A1
20090265839 Young et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090320185 Hassler Dec 2009 A1
20100005573 Rudd et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100299812 Maddux et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100319109 Field Dec 2010 A1
20110072587 Cao et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110107503 Morgan May 2011 A1
20110117310 Anderson et al. May 2011 A1
20110131695 Maddux et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110171420 Yang Jul 2011 A1
20110252544 Abernethy Oct 2011 A1
20110271427 Milsom Nov 2011 A1
20110277221 Ide et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120047635 Finiel et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120096631 King et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120143526 Benzel et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120151663 Rumbaugh Jun 2012 A1
20120151664 Kirshon Jun 2012 A1
20120186002 Bhatnagar et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120186003 Heger et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120192337 Divine et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120198604 Weber et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120198605 Maddux et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120204329 Faden et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207964 Faden et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120208032 Faden et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120216339 Nimmons et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120233745 Veazie Sep 2012 A1
20120266365 Cohen Oct 2012 A1
20120266366 Ferrara Oct 2012 A1
20120297525 Bain Nov 2012 A1
20120304366 Daoust Dec 2012 A1
20120304367 Howard et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317705 Lindsay Dec 2012 A1
20120324634 Coyle Dec 2012 A1
20130000016 Hall et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130000017 Szalkowski et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130000018 Rudd et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007950 Arai Jan 2013 A1
20130019384 Knight Jan 2013 A1
20130019385 Knight Jan 2013 A1
20130025031 Laperriere et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130025032 Durocher et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130025033 Durocher et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130036531 Belanger et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130040524 Halldin et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130042397 Halldin Feb 2013 A1
20130055488 Garneau Mar 2013 A1
20130061371 Phipps et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130061372 Goldstein Mar 2013 A1
20130061375 Bologna et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130111654 Gorsen et al. May 2013 A1
20130122256 Kleiven et al. May 2013 A1
20130185837 Phipps et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130254978 McInnis et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130291289 Szalkowski et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130340147 Giles Dec 2013 A1
20140013492 Bottlang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140020158 Parsons et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140096311 Halldin Apr 2014 A1
20140170372 Fink Jun 2014 A1
20140196198 Cohen Jul 2014 A1
20140196998 Nauman et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150000018 Brandt Jan 2015 A1
20150223546 Cohen Aug 2015 A1
20160021965 Mayerovitch Jan 2016 A1
20170065018 Lindsay Mar 2017 A1
20180249778 Brandt et al. Sep 2018 A1
20190029352 Sadegh et al. Jan 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
101850638 Oct 2010 CN
4226588 Feb 1994 DE
1142495 Oct 2001 EP
2835069 Feb 2015 EP
2530309 Mar 2016 GB
2004032659 Apr 2004 WO
2020236930 Nov 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
Rowson et al., “Linear and Angular Head Acceleration Measurements in Collegiate Football,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vo. 131, 7 pages (Jun. 2009).
Broglio et al., “Biomechanical Properties of Concussions in High School Football,” Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise; www.medscape.com, pp. 1-10, (Nov. 23, 2010).
Greenwald et al., “Head Impact Telemetry System (HITSTM) for Measurement of Head Acceleration in the Field,” American Society of Biomechanics—2003 Annual Meeting, 2 pages.
Daniel et al., “Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 6 pages (Feb. 15, 2012).
ASTM F 1446-04, “Standard Test Methods for Equipment and Procedures Used in Evaluating the Performance Characteristics of Protective Hedgear,” ASTM International, pp. 1-11 (date: unknown).
“Head Injuries in Football,” The New York Times, pp. 4 (Nov. 16, 2011).
Rousseau et al., “A Comparison of Peak Linear and Angular Headform Accelerations Using Ice Hockey Helmets,” Journal of ASTM International; www.astm.org, vol. 6, No. 1, 11 pages (Feb. 20, 2009).
Rowson et al., “Development for the STAR Evaluation System for Football Helmets: Integrating Player Head Impact Exposure and Risk of Concussion,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 11 pages (May 7, 2011).
Rousseau et al., “The Influence of Deflection and Neck Compliance on the Impact Dynamics of a Hybrid III Headform,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 223, Part P: J. Sports Engineering and Technology, pp. 89-97 (Apr. 3, 2009).
“2011 Concussion Report—End of Regular Season,” 4 pages (Jan. 10, 2012).
Shipley, “Traumatic Brain Injury and Diffuse Axonal Injury,” Trial Image Inc.; www.trialimagestore.com, pp. 1-5 (Feb. 18, 2011).
Newman et al., “A New Biomechanical Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Part 2—Results and Conclusions,” 11 pages, (date: unknown).
King et al., “Is Head Injury Caused by Linear or Angular Acceleration?,” IRCOBI Conference, pp. 1-12 (Sep. 2003).
NOCSAE DOC (ND) 001-11M11, “Standard Test Method and Equipment Used in Evaluating the Performance Characteristics of Protective Headgear Equipment,” NOCSAE/National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, pp. 1-25 (Jan. 2012).
NOCSAE DOC (ND) 002-11m11a, “Standard Performance Specification for Newly Manufactured Football Helmets,” NOCSAE/National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, pp. 1-6 (Feb. 2012).
“NOCSAE receives $1.1M Research Grants to Advance Science of Sports Medicine,” 2 pages (Jun. 20, 2011).
“Helmet Safety Group Approves Research Grants,” SFGate.com, 1 page (Jun. 18, 2011).
Bartholet, “The Collision Syndrome,” Scientific American, pp. 68-71 (Feb. 2012).
Kluger, “Headbanger Nation. Concussions are clobbering U.S. kids. Here's why,” Time Magazine, pp. 42-51 (Jan. 31, 2011).
“Concussion,” Wikipedia, 17 pages (page last modified on May 21, 2012).
“Frustoconical,” Wiktionary, N.p., n.d. Web. Aug. 4, 2015.
“Frustum.” Wiktionary. N.p., n.d. Web. Aug. 4, 2015.
“EZ Dri.” INOAC. INOAC, n.d. Web Mar. 2, 2016.
“Outdoor Foam Cushion, Waterproof Foam, Patio Cushion, Furniture Cushions.” Outdoor Foam Cushion, Waterproof Foam, Patio Cushion, Furniture Cushions. N.p., n.d. Web Mar. 2, 2016.
“Reticulated Polyurethane Foam”, Producer of Custom-Engineered Components, Products & Packaging, 4 pages (Oct. 2016).
Qi, HJ and Boyce, MC, Stress-strain Behavior of Thermoplastic Polyurethane. Submitted to Mechanics of Materials. Submitted Dec. 2003, Revised Jul. 2004.
Orringer, et al., Crash Padding Research, vol. 1, Material Mechanical Properties, Final Report, Accessed through the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering Medicine, 1986-87.