HERBICIDE COMPOSITION FOR LAWN

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20110245081
  • Publication Number
    20110245081
  • Date Filed
    June 10, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Published
    October 06, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A herbicide composition for lawn characterized by containing iodosulfuron-methyl or its salt, and at least 1 kind of herbicidal compound selected from the group consisting of oxaziclomefone, fentrazamide, oxadiargyl, ethoxysulfuron, cafenstrole, indanofan, asulam, fenoxaprop, clethodim, ethofumesate, tribenuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl, thifensulfuron-methyl, bromoxynil, MCPA, 2,4-D, dicamba as effective components.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to a herbicide composition for lawn. More specifically the present invention relates to a herbicide composition for lawn consisting of a combination of at least 2 kinds of specified herbicidal compounds.


2. Description of Related Art

  • 4-Iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl]benzoic acid (common name: iodosulfuron-methyl),
  • 3-[1-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-1-methylethyl]-3,4-dihydro-6-methyl-5-phenyl-2H-1,3-oxazin-4-one (common name: oxaziclomefone),
  • 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-cyclohexyl-N-ethyl-4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1H-terazol-1-carboxamide (common name: fentrazamide),
  • 5-tert-butyl-3-(2,4-dichloro-5-propargyloxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2(3H)-one (common name: oxadiargyl),
  • N,N-diethyl-3-meticylsulfonyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-carboxamide (common name: cafenstrole),
  • 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-(2-ethoxyphenoxysulfonyl)urea (common name: ethoxysulfuron),
  • (RS)-2-[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2,3-epoxypropyl]-2-ethylindan-1,3-dione (common name: indanofan),
  • methyl sulfanyl carbamate (common name: asulam)
  • (±)-2-[4-(6-chloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionate; ethyl
  • (±)-2-[4-(6-chlorobenzoxazol-2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionate (common name: fenoxaprop),
  • (±)-2-[(E)-1-[(E)-3-chloroallyloxyimino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-=3-hydroxycycl ohex-2-enone (common name: clethodim),
  • (±)-2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethylbenzofuran-5-yl methanesulfonate (common name: ethofumesate),
  • methyl 2-[4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-(2-yl(methyl)carbamoylsulfamoyl]-benzoate (common name: tribenuron-methyl),
  • methyl 2-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)benzoate (common name: metsulfuron-methyl),
  • methyl 3-(4-methoy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)thiophen-=2-carboxylate (common name: thifensulfuron-methyl),
  • 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile; 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl cyanide (common name: bromoxynil),
  • (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid; 4-chloro-o-tolyloxyacetic acid (common name: MCPA),
  • (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (common name: 2,4-D) and
  • 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (common name: dicamba), are known as herbicide (cf. The Pesticide Manual, 14th Edition, 2006, published by British Crop Protection Council).


Also a herbicide composition containing, for example, iodosulfuron-methyl and other herbicides for controlling rice weeds is known (cf. Japanese Laid-open Patent Publication No. 2002-520342).


Further, a mixed composition of at least 2 kinds of compounds selected from many known herbicides such as iodosulfuron-methyl, oxadiargyl, etc. is also known (cf. Japanese Laid-open Patent Publication No. 2005-502717).


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In the lawn management for instance in a garden, golf course, public green areas, roadsides, etc., control of lawn weeds is the most important task for keeping views and good maintenance of golf course, etc. Up to now, however, there have been no satisfactory herbicides for lawn.


The present inventors found that the combination of the herbicidal compounds mentioned below shows an excellent and desirable effect in terms of weed controlling on the lawn and no or reduced phytotoxicity to the lawn and completed the present invention.


Thus, the present invention provides a herbicide for lawn characterized by combining


(a) iodosulfuron-methyl or its salt, and


(b) at least 1 kind of herbicidal compound selected from the group consisting of oxaziclomefone, fentrazamide, oxadiargyl, ethoxysulfuron, cafenstrole, indanofan, asulam, fenoxaprop, clethodim, ethofumesate, tribenuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl, thifensulfuron-methyl, bromoxynil, MCPA, 2,4-D and dicamba. In the present invention, the particularly preferable example of salt of iodosulfuron-methyl is the sodium salt.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The herbicides (a) and (b) are referred to either by the “common name” according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) or by the chemical name, if appropriate together with a customary code number and in each case include all application forms, such as acids, salts, esters and isomers, such as stereoisomers and optical isomers.


Preferred herbicides (b) are oxaziclomefone, fentrazamide, oxadiargyl, ethoxysulfuron, cafenstrole, indanofan and asulam.


The combined herbicide of the present invention, preferably, shows a substantially higher herbicidal effect (synergistic effect) than the sum of the effect of each active compound by each single application, compared with the case that each active compound of the above-mentioned (a) and (b) is used each singly. As a result, in case of controlling weeds, it is possible to substantially reduce the concentration of each substance used by now. At the same time, the combined herbicide of the present invention shows excellent controlling effect against a wide range of weeds on the lawn and gives no or reduced phytotoxicity to lawn species such as cynodon spp, pasapalum notatum, zoysia spp., stenotaphrum americanum, axonopus spp., eremochloa optiuroides, pennisetum clandestinum, festuca rubra, festuca arundinacea, agrostis stolonifera, agrostis tenuis, poa pretense, lolium perenne. Consequently, the combined herbicide of the present invention can be applied as an excellent, selective herbicide for the lawn.


In the combined herbicide of the present invention, the usage ratio of a component (a) and a component (b) is not strictly restricted but can be varied in a relatively wide range according to the application time, application place, application method, etc. of said combined herbicide. Generally, a herbicidal compound as the component (b) can be used in the range of 0.001-1000 parts by weight, preferably 0.01-100 parts by weight to 1 part by weight of a component (a). More specifically, as for the preferred components (b), there can be used the amounts, for example, in the following ranges to 1 part by weight of iodosulfuron-methyl sodium salt as the component (a):


(b-1) oxaziclomefone: 2-15 parts by weight, preferably 5-10 parts by weight,


(b-2) fentrazamide: 50-110 parts by weight, preferably 60-100 parts by weight,


(b-3) oxadiargyl: 5-15 parts by weight, preferably 7-12 parts by weight,


(b-4) ethoxysulfuron: 3-12 parts by weight, preferably 5-9 parts by weight,


(b-5) cafenstrole: 70-150 parts by weight, preferably 90-130 parts by weight,


(b-6) indanofan: 30-80 parts by weight, preferably 40-70 parts by weight,


(b-7) asulam: 50-110 parts by weight, preferably 60-100 parts by weight.


The combined herbicide of the present invention can be used for controlling various kinds of weeds developing on the lawn.


As examples of the weeds to be controlled there can be mentioned the following:


Monocotyledonous weeds such as: Digitaria ciliayis (Retz.) Koeler, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn., Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. var. viridis, Poa annua L., Alopecurus aequalis Sobol. var. amurensis, Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beau., Luzula capitata (Mig.) Mig, Cyperus rotundus L., Cyperus brevifolius (Rottb.) Hassk. var. leiolepis, Digitaria radicosa (Presl) Mig., Digitaria violascens Link), Setaria faberii Herrm, etc.


Dicotyledonous weeds such as: Rumex japonicus Houtt., Portulaca oleracea L. var. oleracea, Stellaria neglecta Weihe, Kummerowia striata (Thunb. ex Murray) Schindl., Euphorbia supina Rafin, Galinsoga ciliata (Rafin.) Blake, Cerastium glomeratum Thuill., Stellaria alsine Grimm. var undulata (Thunb. ex Murray) Ohwi, Cardamine flexuosa With., Capsella bursa-pastoris Medicus, Lamium amplexicaule L., Veronica persica Poir., Aster maaekii Regel, Oxalis comiculata L., Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides Lam., Plantago asiatica L., Plantago lanceolata L., Artemisia indica Willd. var. maximowiczii (Nakai) Hara, Erigeron philadelphicus L., Rumex acetosa L., Taraxacum officinale Weber, etc.


The use of the combined herbicide of the present invention, however, should not be restricted to these weeds in any way, but can be applied against other weeds in the same manner.


The combined herbicide of the present invention can be made into customary formulation forms in case of using for control of lawn weeds. As such formulation forms there can be mentioned, for example, solutions, emulsions, wettable powders, suspensions, water dispersible granules, powders, soluble powders, granules, suspo-emulsion concentrates, microcapsules in polymer substance, etc.


These formulations can be prepared by per se known methods. The formulations according to the present invention can be prepared, for example, by mixing the aforementioned components (a) and (b) with extenders, namely liquid diluents and/or solid diluents, and, in case of necessity, by using surfactants, namely emulsifiers and/or dispersants.


In case of using water as extender, for example, organic solvents can be used as auxiliary solvent. As liquid diluents there can be mentioned, for example, organic solvents such as aromatic hydrocarbons (for example, xylene, toluene, alkylnaphthalene, etc.), chlorinated aromatic or chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (for example, chlorobenzenes, ethylene chlorides, methylene chloride, etc.), aliphatic hydrocarbons [for example, cyclohexane etc. or paraffins (for example, mineral oil fractions, mineral oils, vegetable oils, etc.)], alcohols (for example, butanol, glycols and their ethers, esters, etc.), ketones (for, example, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, cyclohexanone, etc.), strongly polar solvents (for example, dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, etc.), and water.


As solid diluents there can be mentioned, for example, ground natural minerals (for example, kaolin, clay, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite, diatomaceous earth, etc.), ground synthetic minerals (for example, highly dispersed silicic acid, alumina, silicates, etc.) etc. As solid carriers for granules, for example, crushed and fractionated rocks (for example, calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite, dolomite, etc.) synthetic granules of inorganic and organic meals, particles of organic materials (for example, saw dust, coconut shells, maize cobs, tobacco stalks, etc.) etc. can be used.


As surfactants there can be mentioned nonionic or anionic surfactants. As suitable nonionic surfactants there can be mentioned, for example, compounds obtained by addition polymerization of ethylene oxide to higher alcohols such as lauryl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, oleyl alcohol, etc.; compounds obtained by addition polymerization of ethylene oxide to alkylphenols such as isooctylphenol, nonylphenol, etc.; compounds obtained by addition polymerization of ethylene oxide to alkylnaphthols such as butylnaphthol, octylnaphthol, etc.; compounds obtained by addition polymerization of ethylene oxide to higher fatty acids such as palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, etc.; compounds obtained by addition polymerization of ethylene oxide to amines such as dodecylamine, stearic acid amine, etc.; higher fatty acid esters of polyhydric alcohols such as sorbitan etc. and compounds obtained by addition polymerization of ethylene oxide thereto; compounds obtained by block addition polymerization of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, etc. As suitable anionic surfactants there can be mentioned, for example, alkyl sulfate salts such as sodium lauryl sulfate, amine salt of oleyl alcohol sulfuric acid ester, etc.; alkylsulfonic acid salts such as sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, sodium 2-ethylhexenesulfonate, etc.; arylsulfonic acid salts such as sodium isopropyl-naphthalenesulfonate, sodium methylenebis-naphthalenesulfonate, sodium lignin-sulfonate, sodium dodecylbenezenesulfonate, etc.


As dispersants, for example, lignin sulfite waste liquor or methyl cellulose are suitable.


Tackifiers can also be used in formulations (powders, granules, emulsifiable concentrates). As said tackifiers there can be mentioned, for example, carboxymethyl cellulose, natural and synthetic polymers (for example, gum Arabic, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetates, etc.) natural phospholipids (for example, cephalins or recithins), synthetic phospholipids, etc. Further, as additives, mineral oils or vegetable oils can be used.


Colorants can also be used. As said colorants there can be mentioned inorganic pigments (for example, iron oxide, titanium oxide, Prussian Blue, etc,), organic dyestuffs such as alizarin dyestuffs, azo dyestuffs or metal phthalocyanine dyestuffs, and further traces nutrients such as salts of metals such as iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum, zinc, etc.


The formulations can contain the total of the aforementioned components (a) and (b) constituting the herbicide of the present invention at a concentration in the range of generally 0.1-95% by weight, preferably 0.5-90% by weight.


The herbicide of the present invention can be used for controlling weeds as themselves or in their formulation forms. It is also possible to do tank mixing at the time of usage and further to use together with other known active compounds, for example, other herbicides, safeners, fungicides, insecticides, plant growth regulators, plant nutrients or soil improving agents.


The herbicide of the present invention can be used as such or in their formulation forms or in application forms prepared by further diluting said formulations, for example, in the forms of ready-to-use solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, suspensions, powders, wettable powders, granules, etc. Formulations of these forms can be applied to lawn growing area by usual methods, for example, watering, spraying, atomizing, dusting, granule spreading, etc.


The application amount of the herbicide of the present invention can be varied in a substantial range according to, for example, the weeds to be controlled, application time, soil conditions, formulation form, etc. The application amount can be in the range of, for example, 0.0005 kg-50 kg/ha, preferably 0.001 kg-5 kg/ha as the total amount of the effective components of the components (a) and (b).


The herbicide of the present invention can be applied not only in the form of a mixed formulation containing the components (a) and (b) as mentioned above but also in the form of a single formulation of each component (a) and (b) simultaneously, continuously or successively.


The herbicide of the present invention shows, as shown in the below-mentioned test examples, a precise controlling effect against various kinds of lawn weeds and shows an excellent residual effect.


Excellent effect of the herbicide of the present invention will be described more specifically by the following examples. The present invention, however, should not be restricted only to them in any way. In the examples the component (a) and components (b-1)-(b-7) are defined as aforementioned.


EXAMPLES
Formulation Examples
Example 1
Flowable



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-1)
15.0%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
79.1%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 2
Granule



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-1)
15.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
49.3%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 3
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-1)
15.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
77.3%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Example 4
Flowable



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-2)
30.0%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
65.46%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 5
Granule



















Component (a)
0.17%
by weight



Component (b-2)
15.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
50.83%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 6
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-2)
30.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
63.66%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Example 7
Flowable



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-3)
17.0%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
77.1%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 8
Granule



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-3)
17.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
47.3%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 9
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-3)
17.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
75.3%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Example 10
Flowable



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-4)
12.5%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
81.6%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 11
Granule



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-4)
12.5%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
51.8%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 12
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
1.7%
by weight



Component (b-4)
12.5%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
79.8%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Example 13
Flowable



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-5)
40.0%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
55.46%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 14
Granule



















Component (a)
0.17%
by weight



Component (b-5)
20.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
45.83%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 15
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-5)
40.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
53.66%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Example 16
Flowable



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-6)
20.0%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
75.46%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 17
Granule



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-6)
20.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
45.66%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 18
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-6)
20.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
73.66%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Example 19
Flowable



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-7)
30.0%
by weight



Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether
2.0%
by weight



Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate
2.0%
by weight



Xanthan gum
0.2%
by weight



Water
65.46%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are wet crushed with a wet ball mill to obtain a flowable.


Example 20
Granule



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-7)
30.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate
1.0%
by weight



Bentonite
30.0%
by weight



Talc
35.66%
by weight










After the above-mentioned components have been mixed and crushed, the mixture is granulated by a usual method with a granulator and dried to obtain granules.


Example 21
Wettable Powder



















Component (a)
0.34%
by weight



Component (b-7)
30.0%
by weight



Sodium ligninsulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Sodium dialkyl naphthalenesulfonate
3.0%
by weight



Kaolin
63.66%
by weight










The above-mentioned components are mixed, crushed and homogenized to obtain a wettable powder.


Biological Examples
Test Example 1
The Agent Amount Reduction Effect and Herbicidal Effect Enhancing Action of the Soil Treatment by Mixing

On a field of Zoysia japonica sectioned to 100 cm×100 cm, seeds of Digitaria ciliayis (Retz.) Koeler, Poa annua L., Polygonum hydropiper L., Euphorbia supine Rafin, Oxalis comiculata L., Cyperus microiria were sown and covered with 0.5 cm soil. Seven days after weeds sowing, treatment was conducted with watering amount of 200 cc/m2. The prescribed amount of test compound was sprayed with a small spray in the form of the formulation prepared according to the above-mentioned examples or a wettable powder of a single compound diluted with water.


The herbicidal effect and the degree of phytotoxicity to the lawn were studied 45 days after the agent treatment. The results are shown in Table 1-Table 7.


Evaluation Standard:

Herbicidal effect: 100%: complete death 0%: no effect


Phytotoxicity: 100%: complete death 0%: no phytotoxicity


In the tables, ai means the effective component.













TABLE 1









Effective component





amount g ai/ha
Herbicidal effect

















Iodosulfuron


Digitaria










methyl


ciliayis





Oxalis



Zoysia




sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


corniculata


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Oxaziclomefone
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis

L.

ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

60
60
100
75
70
80
0


methyl sodium


salt


Oxaziclomefone

150
90
90
0
0
0
0
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
75
95
100
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
150
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
225
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 2









Effective component





amount g ai/ha
Herbicidal effect

















Iodosulfuron


Digitaria










methyl


ciliayis







Zoysia




sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Fentrazamide
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

60
60
100
75
70
80
0


methyl sodium


salt


Fentrazamide

1500
90
80
0
0
0
20
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
750
95
100
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
1500
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
2250
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 3









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis







Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Oxadiargyl
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

60
60
100
75
70
80
0


methyl sodium


salt


Oxadiargyl

170
70
70
40
20
20
50
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
85
98
100
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
170
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
225
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 4









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis





Oxalis



Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


corniculata


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Ethoxysulfuron
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis

L.

ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

60
60
100
75
70
80
0


methyl sodium


salt


Ethoxysulfuron

125
0
0
60
75
50
70
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
62.5
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
120
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
182.5
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 5









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis







Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Cafenstrole
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

60
60
100
75
70
80
0


methyl sodium


salt


Cafenstrole

2000
0
0
60
75
50
70
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
1000
80
80
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
2000
100
95
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
3000
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 6









Effective component
Herbicidal effect












amount g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis










methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


Zoysia matrella



Test agent
salt
Indanofan
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

60
60
100
75
70
80
0


methyl sodium


salt


Indanofan

1000
0
0
60
75
50
70
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
500
80
80
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
1000
90
90
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
1500
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 7









Effective component
Herbicidal effect












amount g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis


Poa




Oxalis



Zoysia




methyl

(Retz.)

annua


Polygonum


Erigeron


corniculata


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
sodium salt
Asulam
Koeler
L.

blumei


canadensis

L.

ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Asulam

1500
20
20
0
0
0
0
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
750
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
1500
95
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
2250
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment

(
0
0
0
0
0
0
0









Test Example 2
The Agent Amount Reduction Effect and Herbicidal Effect Enhancing Action of the Foliage and Soil Treatment by Mixing

A test section of Zoysia matrella had been prepared in the same method as in the Test Example 1 and on the 28th day after weeds sowing a treatment was conducted with watering amount of 200 cc/m2. The prescribed amount of test compound was sprayed with a small spray in the form of the formulation prepared according to the aforementioned examples or a wettable powder of a single compound diluted with water.


The herbicidal effect and the degree of phytotoxicity to the lawn were studied 45 days after the agent treatment in the same manner as Test Example 1. The results are shown in Table 8-Table 14.













TABLE 8









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis


Poa






Zoysia




methyl

(Retz.)

annua


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
sodium salt
Oxaziclomefone
Koeler
L.

blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Oxaziclomefone

150
30
30
0
0
0
0
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
75
90
95
100
90
90
100
0


present
17
150
95
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
225
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 9









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis





Oxalis



Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


corniculata


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Fentrazamide
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis

L.

ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Fentrazamide

1500
40
30
0
0
0
0
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
750
90
90
100
90
90
100
0


present
17
1500
95
100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
2250
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 10









Effective component
Herbicidal effect












amount ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis







Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Oxadiargyl
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Oxadiargyl

170
40
30
20
20
0
30
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
85
90
90
90
90
90
100
0


present
17
170
100
95
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
225
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 11









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis





Oxalis



Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


corniculata


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Ethoxysulfuron
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis

L.

ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Ethoxysulfuron

125
0
0
40
60
30
50
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
62.5
90
90
95
100
100
100
0


present
17
120
100
95
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
182.5
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 12









Effective component amount
Herbicidal effect












g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis







Zoysia




methyl sodium

(Retz.)

Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
salt
Cafenstrole
Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Cafenstrole

2000
40
30
0
0
0
20
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
1000
80
80
90
90
90
90
0


present
17
2000
100
95
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
3000
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 13









Effective component





amount g ai/ha
Herbicidal effect

















Iodosulfuron


Digitaria







Zoysia




methyl


ciliayis


Poa


Polygonum


Erigeron


Oxalis


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
sodium salt
Indanofan
(Retz.) Koeler

annua L.


blumei


canadensis


corniculata L.


ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Indanofan

1000
30
30
0
0
0
20
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
500
80
80
90
80
90
90
0


present
17
1000
90
90
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
1500
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0




















TABLE 14









Effective component
Herbicidal effect












amount g ai/ha

Digitaria



















Iodosulfuron


ciliayis


Poa




Oxalis



Zoysia




methyl

(Retz.)

annua


Polygonum


Erigeron


corniculata


Chenopodium


matrella



Test agent
sodium salt
Asulam
Koeler
L.

blumei


canadensis

L.

ficifolium

phytotoxicity



















Iodosulfuron
17

40
50
80
75
50
70
0


methyl sodium


salt


Asulam

1500
40
30
70
60
60
60
0


Herbicide of the
8.5
750
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


present
17
1500

100
100
100
100
100
0


invention
25.5
2250
100
100
100
100
100
100
0


No treatment


0
0
0
0
0
0
0








Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling a weed comprising applying (a) iodosulfuron-methyl or a salt thereof, and(b) fenoxaprop.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said iodosulfuron-methyl or a salt thereof is iodosulfuron-methyl sodium salt.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied in a range from 0.001 kg-5 kg/ha as the total amount of said components of (a) and (b).
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied in a mixed formulation comprising said components of (a) and (b).
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied in a single formulation of each component (a) and (b).
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied simultaneously.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied continuously.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied successively.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are applied to lawn.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said weed is selected from the group consisting of Digitaria ciliayis Koeler, Eleusine indica Gaertn., Setaria viridis Beauv. var. viridis, Poa annua L., Alopecurus aequalis Sobol. var amurensis, Imperata cylindrica Beau., Luzula capitata Mig, Cyperus rotundus L., Cyperus brevifolius Hassk. var. leiolepis, Digitaria radicosa Mig., Digitaria violascens, Setaria faberii Herrm, Rumex japonicus Houtt., Portulaca oleracea L. var. oleracea, Stellaria neglecta Weihe, Kummerowia striata Schindl., Euphorbia supina Rafin, Galinsoga ciliata Blake, Cerastium glomeratum Thuill., Stellaria alsine Grimm. var. undulata Ohwi, Cardamine flexuosa With., Capsella bursa-pastoris Medicus, Lamium amplexicaule L., Veronica persica Poir., Aster maaekii Regel, Oxalis corniculata L., Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides Lam., Plantago asiatica L., Plantago lanceolata L., Artemisia indica Willd. var. maximowiczii Hara, Erigeron philadelphicus L., Rumex acetosa L., and Taraxacum officinale Weber.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) exhibit a synergistic effect.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are present in a ratio of 1:0.01-100 part by weight of components (a) to (b).
  • 13. A composition for controlling weeds comprising (a) iodosulfuron-methyl or a salt thereof, and(b) fenoxaprop.
  • 14. The composition of claim 13, wherein said iodosulfuron-methyl or a salt thereof is iodosulfuron-methyl sodium salt.
  • 15. The composition of claim 13, wherein components (a) and (b) exhibit a synergistic effect.
  • 16. The composition of claim 13, wherein components (a) and (b) are present in a ratio of 1:0.01-100 part by weight of components (a) to (b).
  • 17. The composition of claim 13, further comprising an extender.
  • 18. The composition of claim 17, wherein said extender is a diluent, surfactant, emulsifier, and/or dispersant.
  • 19. A method of preparing a composition for controlling weeds comprising mixing (a) iodosulfuron-methyl or a salt thereof,(b) fenoxaprop; and(c) an extender.
  • 20. The method of preparing a composition of claim 19, wherein said composition is in the form of a ready-to-use solution, emulsifiable concentrate, suspension, powders, wettable powder, or granules.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
2006-116578 Apr 2006 JP national
PCT/EP2007/002883 Mar 2007 EP regional
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/226,428, filed Oct. 13, 2009, which claims priority to PCT/EP2007/002883, filed Mar. 30, 2007, which claims priority to Japanese Application No. 2006-116578 filed Apr. 20, 2006. Each of these applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12226482 Mar 2009 US
Child 13157416 US
Parent 12226428 Oct 2009 US
Child 12226482 US