The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Jun. 26, 2014, is named SL_043214_080274_C.txt and is 2,197 bytes in size.
The present invention is primarily concerned with vaccines that can be used to immunize patients against Herpes Simplex Virus type 2 (HSV-2) infections associated with chronic genital ulcers. The vaccine utilizes a replication defective HSV-2 virus that has been engineered to express high levels of HSV-2 glycoprotein D antigen (gD2). In preferred embodiments, the HSV-2 virus also expresses one or more immunomodulating genes, such as IL15 and/or HSV-1 or HSV-2 major antigens such as gB or gC.
Herpes Simplex Viruses (HSV) and HSV Infections
Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) is the primary cause of genital ulcer disease. It can cause both an acute, productive infection and a long-term latent infection characterized by unpredictable periodic recurrences (66). Apart from causing lifelong, recurrent genital ulcers, HSV infections are a major concern in AIDS patients. It has been documented that genital HSV-2 infection triples the risk for sexually acquiring HIV infection (20), and in Africa, this increase in risk may contribute to 25-35% of incident HIV infections (1).
Although the severity and duration of most symptomatic HSV primary infections can be reduced by oral or intravenous treatment with acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir, antiviral therapy neither prevents the establishment of latent infection from primary infection nor reduces subsequent recurrences (66). The continued spread of genital herpes in the United States over the past two decades (19) and the increasing incidence of HSV resistant to current antiviral medications suggest that there is a need for safe and efficacious vaccines against HSV infections (31, 60). In addition, the finding that HSV suppressive therapy leads to a significant reduction in levels of HIV in the genital mucosa and plasma of women infected with both HSV-2 and HIV (52) suggests that an effective HSV vaccine may also have major implications in control of HIV infection (1, 31).
HSV-2 Glycoprotein D (gD2)
HSV glycoprotein D (gD) is one of the most predominant viral antigens expressed on the surface of infected cells (21) and as well as on the viral envelope (24). gD is essential for the entry of the virus into cells and is a major target for neutralizing antibodies against HSV infection (12, 49, 53). Moreover, gD is the predominant viral target for CD4+ T cells including CD4+ T cell cytotoxicity and CD8+ T cells in human and murine models of HSV infection (27, 28, 30, 34, 47, 65, 75). For these reasons, gD has been a major focus for HSV subunit vaccine development (32, 60).
In a phase 3 clinical trial, Stanberry, et al., showed that vaccination with recombinant gD from HSV-2 (gD2), in combination with adjuvant AS04, provided 73-74% efficacy in protecting against the development of genital herpes disease in HSV-seronegative women (62). No significant efficacy was observed, however, in men and in subjects who were seropositive for HSV-1. Although gD2-specific humoral and CD4+ T cell responses were detected in the immunized hosts, it is not clear whether gD2/AS04 was effective in eliciting a CD8+ T cell response (31, 32). This study suggests that there is a need for an HSV vaccine that elicits a broader humoral, as well as CD4 and CD8 T-cell, response to both gD2 and other HSV viral antigens (29, 31, 32).
Viral Vaccines
It is well documented that live viral vaccines capable of de novo synthesis of immunogens in the host induce a broader and more durable immune response than vaccines consisting of only peptides or proteins. Various forms of replication-defective HSV and neuroattenuated, replication-competent mutants have been developed and tested as potential in vaccines against HSV infection (U.S. Pat. No. 7,223,411; (18)).
Because both replication-defective viruses and neuroattenuated mutants can co-replicate with wild-type virus or become replication-competent in the context of wild-type virus, their use as a vaccine in humans poses a safety concern, particularly in individuals who harbor latent HSV infection (33). The observation that replication-defective HSV-1 mutants can reactivate the latent HSV-1 immediate-early promoter in the rodent brain has raised additional safety concerns about the possibility of such recombinants triggering outbreaks of productive viral infections in latently infected individuals (63). Thus, a desirable replication-defective recombinant HSV vaccine should not only possess the ability to express a broad spectrum of virus-encoded antigens but should also encode a unique function that can prevent lytic infection of wild-type HSV when encountered within the same cells. Such a safety mechanism would minimize the potential outbreak of the vaccine virus caused by the recombination of the vaccine vector with wild type virus in the host.
In general, the present invention is based upon the use of tetracycline gene-switch technology (T-REx, Invitrogen) (73) and a dominant-negative mutant form of the HSV-1 UL9 polypeptide, e.g., UL9-C535C, to develop a safe and effective recombinant viral vaccine against HSV-2 infection.
In its first aspect, the invention is directed to a replication-defective, dominant-negative Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) recombinant virus. The genome of the virus has, at least, a first sequence encoding a first HSV-2 glycoprotein D (gD2) operably linked to a first promoter and, preferably, a second sequence encoding a second HSV-2 gD2 which is operably linked to a second promoter. The promoter(s) are operably linked to a first tetracycline operator (tet-O) sequence and a second tet-O sequence respectively, each of which allows transcription to proceed when free of tet repressor but which blocks transcription when bound by repressor. The genome also includes a third sequence which encodes, at least, a first dominant negative mutant form of the HSV-1 or HSV-2 UL9 protein linked to a third promoter and, preferably, a fourth sequence which encodes a second dominant negative form of the HSV-1 or HSV-2 UL9 protein linked to a fourth promoter. Like the first and second promoters, the third and fourth promoters are each operably linked to a tet-O sequence which, if bound by tet repressor, blocks transcription. In addition, the genome of the virus is characterized by the absence of a sequence encoding a functional ICP0 protein. In order to enhance its antigenicity, the genome should preferably also express immunomodulating genes, such as IL12 or IL15 and/or HSV-1 or HSV-2 major antigens such as gB or gC.
The term “operably linked” refers to genetic elements that are joined together in a manner that enables them to carry out their normal functions. For example, a gene is operably linked to a promoter when its transcription is under the control of the promoter and this transcription results in the production of the product normally encoded by the gene. A tet operator sequence is operably linked to a promoter when the operator blocks transcription from the promoter in the presence of bound tet repressor and but allows transcription in the absence of the repressor. The term “recombinant” refers to a virus that has nucleic acid sequences that were, at some time, formed by the recombination of nucleic acid sequences and sequence elements and the introduction of these recombined sequences into the virus or into an ancestor virus.
Preferably, the promoters used are those that have a TATA element and the tet operator sequences linked to the promoters have two op2 repressor binding sites joined together by between two and twenty linking nucleotides. The positioning of the operator sequence is important to achieve effective control over the promoter. Specifically, the first nucleotide in the operator sequence must be located between six and twenty-four nucleotides 3′ to the last nucleotide in the TATA element. Structural sequences encoding, for example gD or a dominant-negative mutant polypeptide of UL9, would lie 3′ to the operator. Among specifically preferred promoters are the hCMV immediate early promoter and HSV-1 or HSV-2 immediate early promoters. Especially preferred is the HSV-1 or HSV-2 ICP4 promoter.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a vaccine that can be used prophylactically or therapeutically against HSV expression and which comprises one or more of the recombinant viruses described above in unit dose form. The term “unit dose form” refers to a single drug administration entity such as a tablet or capsule. Preferably the “unit dose form” will be a solution in which drug is dissolved at a concentration that provides a therapeutic or prophylactic effect when a selected volume (unit dose) is administered to a patient by injection and will be found within an injection vial. Based on the effective dose used in mice (2×106 PFU), it is believed that the minimal effective dose in human should be about 1×107 pfu. Thus, a unit dose should have at least this amount of virus, with 1×107-1×109 pfu being typical. Vaccines may be stored in a lyophilized form and reconstituted in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier prior to administration. Alternatively, preparations may be stored in the vehicle itself. The volume of a single dose of the vaccine will vary but, in general, should be between about 0.1 ml and 10 ml and, more typically, between about 0.2 ml and 5 ml.
The invention also includes methods of immunizing patients against HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection and the conditions resulting from such infection (e.g., genital Herpes ulcers) by administering to the patients the vaccines described above. The vaccines may also be given to patients that have been infected to prevent or reduce outbreaks of the virus. Any method for administering a vaccine to a patient which does not result in the destruction of virus is compatible with the present invention. Generally, administration will be by parenteral means such as by intramuscular or intravenous injection. The dosage and scheduling of administration of vaccines can be determined using methods that are routine in the art. The preparations may be administered in either single or multiple injections.
The present invention is based upon the concept of using tetracycline gene-switch technology and a dominant-negative mutant polypeptide of HSV-1 UL9 to develop an HSV recombinant virus which is replication defective and capable of inhibiting wild-type HSV infections (dominant-negative). CJ9-gD is a prototype dominant-negative, replication defective HSV-1 recombinant virus and expresses high-levels of HSV-1 major antigen glycoprotein D (gD) independent of HSV viral DNA replication (7). In its most preferred form, the present invention uses a dominant-negative and replication-defective HSV-2 recombinant (CJ2-gD2) that encodes 2 copies of the HSV-2 gD (gD2) gene, driven by the tetO-bearing HSV-1 major immediate-early ICP4 promoter. CJ2-gD2 expresses gD2 as efficiently as wild-type HSV-2 and can exert a powerful trans-inhibitory effect on the replication of wild type HSV-2 in co-infected cells. Immunization with CJ2-gD2 elicits effective HSV-2-specific neutralizing antibody as well as T-cell responses, and offers a complete protection against intravaginal infection by wild-type HSV-2 in mice.
CJ2-gD2 is a more effective vaccine than CJ9-gD in protection against wild-type HSV-2 genital infection and disease. Furthermore, intracerebral injection of a high dose of CJ2-gD2 causes no mortality or morbidity in mice. Collectively, these observations suggest that CJ2-gD2 has advantages over traditional replication-defective virus vaccines and HSV-2 subunit vaccines in protecting against HSV-2 genital infection and disease in humans.
The Tet Operator/Repressor Switch and Recombinant DNA
The present invention is directed to, inter alia, viruses having genes whose expression is regulated by the tetracycline operator and repressor protein. Methods that can be employed to make recombinant DNA molecules containing these elements and DNA sequences have been previously described (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,871; U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,640; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,972,650) and plasmids which contain the tetracycline-inducible transcription switch are commercially available (T-REx™, Invitrogen, CA).
An essential feature of the DNA of the present invention is the presence of genes that are operably linked to a promoter, preferably having a TATA element. A tet operator sequence is located between 6 and 24 nucleotides 3′ to the last nucleotide in the TATA element of the promoter and 5′ to the gene. Virus may be grown in cells that express the tet repressor in order to block gene transcription and allow viral replication. The strength with which the tet repressor binds to the operator sequence is enhanced by using a form of operator which contains two op2 repressor binding sites (each such site having the nucleotide sequence: TCCCTATCAGTGATAGAGA (SEQ ID NO:1)) linked by a sequence of 2-20, preferably 1-3 or 10-13, nucleotides. When repressor is bound to this operator, very little or no transcription of the associated gene will occur. If DNA with these characteristics is present in a cell that also expresses the tetracycline repressor, transcription of the gene that can prevent viral infection will be blocked by the repressor binding to the operator and replication of the virus will occur.
Selection of Promoters and Genes
During productive infection, HSV gene expression falls into three major classes based on the temporal order of expression: immediate-early (α), early (β), and late (γ), with late genes being further divided into two groups, γ1 and γ2. The expression of immediate-early genes does not require de novo viral protein synthesis and is activated by the virion-associated protein VP16 together with cellular transcription factors when the viral DNA enters the nucleus. The protein products of the immediate-early genes are designated infected cell polypeptides ICP0, ICP4, ICP22, ICP27, and ICP47 and it is the promoters of these genes that are preferably used in directing the expression of the recombinant genes discussed herein.
ICP0 plays a major role in enhancing the reactivation of HSV from latency and confers a significant growth advantage on the virus at low multiplicities of infection. ICP4 is the major transcriptional regulatory protein of HSV-1, which activates the expression of viral early and late genes. ICP27 is essential for productive viral infection and is required for efficient viral DNA replication and the optimal expression of viral γ genes and a subset of viral β genes. The function of ICP47 during HSV infection appears to be to down-regulate the expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I on the surface of infected cells.
The full length sequence of the HSV-1 genome sequence of the coding region of the HSV-1 UL9-C535C is shown in
Inclusion of Tet Repressor and Making of Virus
Sequences for the HSV ICP0 and ICP4 promoters and for the genes whose regulation they endogenously control are well known in the art (43, 44, 56) and procedures for making viral vectors containing these elements have been previously described (see US published application 2005-0266564). These promoters are not only very active in promoting gene expression, they are also specifically induced by VP16, a transactivator released when HSV-1 or HSV-2 infects a cell.
Once appropriate DNA constructs have been produced, they may be incorporated into HSV-2 virus using methods that are well known in the art (see generally Yao et al. (68)).
Immunization Methods
The viruses described herein will be used to immunize individuals and/or patients, typically by injection as a vaccine. The vaccine may be used both prophylactically to prevent HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection or therapeutically to reduce the severity of an HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection that has already occurred. In order make a vaccine, the viruses can be suspended in any pharmaceutically acceptable solution including sterile isotonic saline, water, phosphate buffered saline, 1,2-propylene glycol, polyglycols mixed with water, Ringer's solution, etc. The exact number of viruses to be administered is not crucial to the invention but should be an “effective amount,” i.e., an amount sufficient to elicit an immunological response strong enough to inhibit HSV infection. In general, it is expected that the number of viruses (PFU) initially administered will be between 1×107 and 1×1010.
The effectiveness of a dosage, as well as the effectiveness of the overall treatment can be assessed using standard immunological methods to test for the presence of antibodies effective at attacking HSV. Immunological injections can be repeated as many times as desired.
The current example describes the creation of an HSV-2 recombinant virus and tests to determine its immunological effects.
I. Materials and Methods
Cells
African Green Monkey Kidney (Vero) cells and the osteosarcoma line U2OS cells were grown and maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Sigma Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in the presence of 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate (GIBCO, Carlsbad, Calif.) (71). U2OS cells are able to complement functionally for the HSV-1 ICP0 deletion (71). U2CEP4R11 cells are tetR-expressing U2OS cells that were maintained in DMEM plus 10% FBS and hygromycin B at 50 μg/ml (73). VCEP4R-28 cells are tetR-expressing Vero cells that were maintained in DMEM plus 10% FBS and hygromycin B at 50 μg/ml (73).
Plasmids
Plasmid pHSV2/ICP0 is a pUC19 derived plasmid that encodes the PCR amplified HSV-2 ICP0 sequences covering 268 bp upstream of the HSV-2 ICP0 open reading frame (ORF) to 40 bp downstream of the poly A signal of ICP0 coding sequences. pHSV2.ICP0-V is an HSV-2 ICP0 cloning plasmid, derived from plasmid pHSV-2/ICP0, by replacing the Xho I-ICP0 DNA fragment containing sequences 25 bp upstream of the initiation codon of ICP0 to 397 bp upstream of the stop codon of ICP0 ORF with a Xho I-containing multiple cloning sequence (MCS). Plasmid pHSV2.ICP0-lacZ was created by inserting HindIII-Not I-LacZ gene-containing fragment of pcDNA3-lacZ into pHSV2.ICP0-V at the Hind III-Not I sites. pcmvtetO-UL9C535C is a plasmid encoding UL9-C535C under control of the tetO-containing hCMV immediate-early promoter (68). p02lacZ-TOC535C, expressing UL9-C535C driven by the tetO-containing hCMV major immediate-early promoter (
pAzgD-HSV-2 is an HSV-2 gD2-encoding plasmid kindly provided by Dr. Patricia Spear (Northwestern University). pICP4TO-hEGF expresses human epidermal growth factor under control of the tetO-bearing HSV-1 immediate-early ICP4 promoter, which consists of HSV-1 ICP4 promoter sequence from −377 bp to −19 bp relative to the transcriptional start site of ICP4 gene. Similar to the tetO-bearing hCMV major immediate-early promoter in plasmid pcmvtetO-hEGF (73), the tetO-containing ICP4 promoter contains two tandem copies of tet operators at 10 bp downstream of the ICP4 TATA element, TATATGA. Thus, like pcmvtetO-hEGF, hEGF-expression from pICP4TO-hEGF can be tightly regulated by tetracycline in the presence of tetR, and insertion of the tetO has no effect on the ICP4 promoter activity in the absence of tetR. An additional unique feature associated with the tetO-bearing ICP4 promoter in pICP4TO-hEGF is the absence of the ICP4 DNA binding sequence ATCGTCCACACGGAG (SEQ ID NO:3), which spans the transcription initiation site of ICP4 gene (51) in the wild-type ICP4 promoter. Thus, unlike the wild-type ICP4 promoter that is subject to auto-regulation by ICP4 (16, 57), the tetO-bearing ICP4 promoter in pICP4TO-hEGF will not be suppressed by the HSV-1 major-regulatory protein ICP4.
To clone gD2 under the control of the tetO-containing ICP4 promoter, we first constructed plasmid p02ICP4-TO by cloning the Sma I-Bam HI tetO-containing ICP4 promoter in pICP4TO-hEGF into pHSV2.ICP0-V into the MCS of the vector. p02.4TO-gD2 is a p02ICP4-TO derived plasmid that encodes gD2 gene of pAzgD-HSV-2 under control of the tetO-bearing ICP4 promoter.
p02lacZTO-gD2.C535C, a plasmid encoding UL9-C535C under the control of the tetO-bearing hCMV immediate-early promoter with a 5′ truncation at −236 bp of the hCMV promoter and the gD2 gene under control of the tetO-ICP4 promoter (
Viruses
Wild-type HSV-2, strains 186 and G, were propagated and plaque-assayed on Vero cells. N2-lacZ is a HSV-2 ICP0 null mutant encoding the Lac Z gene under the control of HSV-2 ICP0 promoter, in which both copies of the ICP0 gene are replaced by the Lac Z gene in pHSV2.ICP0-lacZ through homologous recombination by transfecting U2OS cells with Nhe I-linearized pHSV2.ICP0-lacZ followed by HSV-2 superinfection as previously described (74). The replacement of the ICP0 gene with the Lac Z gene at the ICP0 locus was confirmed by PCR analysis of N2-lacZ viral DNA with the primers that flank the ICP0 gene and primers specific for the lac Z gene (41, 74).
N2-C535C is a derivative of N2-lacZ, in which both copies of the Lac Z gene are replaced with DNA sequences encoding UL9-C535C under control of the tetO-containing hCMV promoter in plasmid p02lacZ-TOC535C (
CJ2-gD2 is constructed by replacing both copies of the Lac Z gene at the ICP0 locus in N2-lacZ with DNA sequences encoding UL9-C535C under the tetO-bearing hCMV major immediate-early promoter and gD2 under the control of the tetO-containing HSV-1 ICP4 promoter (
SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis
Vero cells seeded in 60 mm dishes at 7.5×105 cells/dish were mock-infected or infected with indicated viruses at an MOI of 10 PFU/cell. Cell extracts were prepared at 9 h or 16 h post-infection (72). Proteins in the cell extract were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (9% acrylamide), transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, and probed with either polyclonal antibodies against HSV-1 gD (R45, a gift of Drs. Gary H. Cohen and Roselyn J Eisenberg), UL9 (a gift of Mark Challberg), or monoclonal antibodies specific for ICP27 and gB (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.).
Mice
Female BALB/c mice 4-6 weeks of age were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, Mass.). Mice were housed in metal cages at four mice per cage and maintained on a 12 h-light/dark cycle. Mice were allowed to acclimatize to the housing conditions for 1 week prior to experimentation. All animal experiments were conducted according to the protocols approved by Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals and the American Veterinary Medical Association.
Immunization and Challenges
BALB/c mice were randomly divided into several groups and the hair on their left rear flank was trimmed. Mice were either vaccinated with 2×106 PFU/mouse of CJ2-gD2, N2-C535C, CJ9-gD, or mock-vaccinated with DMEM in a volume of 30 μl s.c. in the left rear flank using a 1-ml syringe fitted with a 27-gauge needle. Mice were boosted after 2 weeks and challenged with wild-type HSV-2 strain G 3 weeks after secondary immunization. Five days prior to challenge, mice were injected s.c. in the neck ruff with medroxyprogesterone (SICOR Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Irvine, Calif.) at 3 mg per mouse in a volume of 20 μl (7, 50). For intravaginal challenge, mice in all groups were anesthetized, preswabbed with a calcium alginate swab (Sterile urethro-genital calcium alginate tipped applicator, Puritan Medical Products company LLC, Guilford, Me. USA) and inoculated intravaginally with 20 μl of culture medium containing 5×105 PFU (50 LD50) of HSV-2 strain G (50). Animals were kept on their backs with their rear part elevated under the influence of anesthesia for 30-45 min post-infection.
Acute Infection Assays and Clinical Observations
On days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 post-challenge, vaginal mucosae were swabbed with calcium alginate (7). Infectious viruses in swab materials were assessed by standard plaque assay on Vero cell monolayers. Following challenge with wild-type HSV-2, mice were assessed daily during a 21-day follow-up period for signs of genital lesions and systemic illness. The severity of disease were scored as follows: 0=no sign of herpetic infection, 1=slight genital erythema and edema, 2=moderate genital inflammation, 3=purulent genital lesions and/or systemic illness, 4=hind-limb paralysis, and 5=death (8, 50).
Detection of HSV-2-Specific Neutralizing Antibodies
Blood was collected from tail veins of immunized and mock-immunized mice 4 weeks after primary immunization. Neutralizing serum antibody titers were determined as previously described in the presence of complement (5-7) with 250 PFU of wild-type HSV-2 strain 186. The neutralizing antibody titer was expressed as the final serum dilution required to achieve a 50% reduction in HSV PFU relative to the HSV PFU obtained in medium plus complement alone.
Immunoprecipitation
U2OS cells seeded at 7.5×106 cells per 100-mm dish were mock-transfected or transfected with 10 μg of p02.4TO-gD by lipofectamine 2000 at 24 h post-seeding. Cell extracts were prepared at 48 h post-transfection (72). Immunoprecipitations were performed by mixing 10 μl of pooled serum collected from mock-immunized and immunized mice with 70 μl of cell extracts prepared above. The gD/mouse IgG-specific complexes were precipitated with Protein A (Pierce Classic IP kit, Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, Ill.), resolved on SDS-PAGE and probed with the rabbit anti-gD-specific polyclonal antibody, R45, following by reacting with HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.).
IFN-γ ELISPOT Assays
Female BALB/c mice were sham-immunized with DMEM or immunized with CJ2-gD2 at a dose of 2×106 PFU/mouse twice at 2-weeks apart. At 5 to 10 weeks post second immunization, sham-immunized and CJ2-gD2-immunized mice were mock-challenged or challenged with wild-type HSV-2 strain 186 s.c. at a dose of 1×104 PFU/mouse. Splenocytes were isolated from individual groups of mice (n=3) on days 4 or 5 post-challenge. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cell ELISPOT assay was carried out as previously described (42). In brief, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated from splenocytes using Dynal mouse CD4- or CD8-negative isolation kits and seeded in quadruplicate in a 96-well filtration plate pre-coated with anti-mouse IFN-γ specific monoclonal antibody (AN18) at 7.5×104 or 1.5×105 cells/well. After incubation at 37° C. for 20 h, wells were washed, reacted with biotinylated IFN-γ specific monoclonal antibody (R4-6A2, Mabtech) at room temperature, and incubated with Streptavidin-Alkaline Phosphatase (Mabtech). The IFN-γ spot-forming cells were detected by addition of BCIP/NBT substrate. Spots were counted in a dissecting microscope and the number of IFN-γ spot-forming cells (SFC) was expressed as the mean±SEM per million CD4+ or CD8+ T cells.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
The lower lumbar and sacral part of the spinal column including spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia were collected 16 days after boost immunization or 21 days after intravaginal challenge with 5×105 PFU of HSV-2 strain G from 9 or 10 mice that had been either immunized with CJ2-gD2 or CJ9-gD. The spinal column was cut into 4 pieces and each piece was kept separately in 0.5 ml of normal growth medium and stored at −80° C. for further processing. Total DNA was isolated from each dorsal root ganglion using the DNeasy tissue kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, Calif.), and suspended in 400 μl AE buffer. The presence of HSV-2 DNA was quantified by real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System) with 100 ng of ganglia DNA and primers specific to the HSV DNA polymerase (Forward: 5′ GCT CGA GTG CGA AAA AAC GTT C (SEQ ID NO:4), Reverse: 5′ CGG GGC GCT CGG CTA AC (SEQ ID NO:5)) as previously described (8). The minimal copies of HSV-2 viral DNA that can be reliably detected were 1 copy per reaction.
Statistical Analysis
For statistical analysis un-paired Student's t-tests were performed. Results are considered to be statistically significant when the P value is less than 0.05.
II. Results
Construction of CJ2-gD2
As the first step in generating a gD2- and UL9-C535C-expressing dominant-negative and replication-defective HSV-2 recombinant virus, we constructed an HSV-2 ICP0 deletion mutant, N2-lacZ, in which both copies of ICP0 gene in HSV-2 strain 186 are replaced by the LacZ gene under the control of the HSV-2 ICP0 promoter (
Aiming to maximize levels of gD2 expression by a dominant-negative and replication-defective HSV-2 viral recombinant, we constructed a dominant-negative and replication-defective HSV-2 recombinant (CJ2-gD2) by replacing both copies of the Lac Z gene in N2-lacZ with DNA sequences encoding the gD2 gene driven by the tetO-bearing HSV-1 major immediate-early ICP4 promoter and UL9-C535C under control of the tetO-containing hCMV major immediate-early promoter with a truncation at the −236 bp of the full-length of hCMV immediate-early promoter (
CJ2-gD2 Expresses High Levels of gD2 and UL9-C535C in Infected Vero Cells
To examine expression of gD2 and UL9-C535C from the tetO-bearing HSV-1 immediate-early ICP4 promoter and hCMV immediate-early promoter, respectively, Vero cells were infected with wild-type HSV-2, N2-lacZ, N2-C535C, and CJ2-gD2 at a MOI of 10 PFU/cell and harvested at 9 h post-infection. Infected cell proteins were analyzed by western blot assays with an HSV-½ ICP27 monoclonal antibody, a UL9 polyclonal antibody, and a gD1 polyclonal antibody (R45). Given that, like gD2, gB2 is the major target for neutralizing antibody as well as T-cell responses and is a γ1 product, infected cell proteins were also probed with a gB-specific monoclonal antibody.
Western blot analysis with the gD1 polyclonal antibody (R45) presented in
To demonstrate that the UL9-C535C and gD2 expressed in CJ2-gD2-infected Vero cells are indeed under the control of the tetO-bearing promoters, we next infected a stable tetR-expressing Vero cell line, VCEP4R-28 cells, with wild-type HSV-2 and CJ2-gD2 at an MOI of 10 PFU/cell in the absence or presence of tetracycline. Proteins from infected cells were harvested at 9 h post-infection and analyzed by western blots. As can be seen (
CJ2-gD2 Cannot Replicate in Vero Cells
Because of the lack of ICP0 and high-level expression of UL9-C535C from the tetO-bearing hCMV major immediate-early promoter, CJ2-gD2 had to be constructed and propagated in the tetR-expressing ICP0 complementing U2OS cell line U2CEP4R11 (68). We plaque-assayed 6.65×107 PFU of CJ2-gD2 on Vero cell monolayers and detected no infectious virus, demonstrating that the plaque-forming efficiency of CJ2-gD2 in Vero cells is reduced at least 6.65×107-fold compared with its complementing U2CEP4R11 cells.
Inhibition of Wild-Type HSV-2 Replication by CJ2-gD2
We next tested the dominant-negative effect of high-level UL9-C535C expression by CJ2-gD2 on the replication of wild-type HSV-2 viral replication by the co-infection assay (
To further examine the potency of CJ2-gD2 in inhibiting the replication of wild-type HSV-2, we carried out co-infection experiments with wild-type HSV-2 and CJ2-gD2 at MOI ratios of 1:1 and 3:1, respectively. The results in
CJ2-gD2 is Avirulent Following Intracerebral Injection in Mice
Neurovirulence is one of the hallmarks of HSV infection. To determine the ability of CJ2-gD2 and N2-C535C to replicate in the CNS, female BALB/c mice 5 to 6-weeks-old were randomly assigned to five groups of 8 mice each. CJ2-gD2 and N2-C535C were directly inoculated into the brain of each mouse at the left frontal lobe at 2.5×106 PFU per mouse in a 20 μl volume with a 28-gauge insulin needle at the depth of 4 mm (74). Morbidity and mortality were monitored for 35 days. Given that the LD50 of wild-type HSV-2 strain 186 is around 10 PFU in female BALB/c mice after intravitreal injection (38), a group of mice were also inoculated with wild-type HSV-2 at 25 PFU/mouse. As an additional control, mice in the fifth group were inoculated with N2-lacZ at 1×106 PFU/mouse.
Induction of HSV-2-Specific Neutralizing Antibodies and a gD2-Specific Antibody Response in Mice Immunized with CJ2-gD2
The ability of CJ2-gD2 to elicit anti-HSV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies was determined in mice immunized with CJ2-gD2 at a dose of 2×106 PFU. As controls, groups of mice were also immunized with N2-C535C or CJ9-gD at the same dose. As shown (
Induction of HSV-2-Specific T-Cell Response in Mice Immunized with CJ2-gD2
To evaluate the effectiveness of CJ2-gD2 immunization in eliciting HSV-2-specific T-cell response, we carried out the recall experiment to examine the memory T-cell responses in immunized mice following challenge with wild-type HSV-2. First, sham-vaccinated and CJ2-gD2-vaccinated mice were either mock-challenged or challenged with wild-type HSV-2 at 9-10 weeks post-boost immunization followed by IFN-γ ELISPOT assays with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells isolated from spleens of individual groups of mice (n=3) on day 5 post-challenge (
While there was a greater than 2-fold increase in IFN-γ-secreting CD8+ T cells in CJ2-gD2-vaccinated mice compared with the sham-vaccinated controls, similar numbers of IFN-γ-secreting CD8+ T cells were detected in the spleens of HSV-2-infected sham-vaccinated mice and HSV-2-infected CJ2-gD2-vaccinated mice (
Protection Against HSV-2 Genital Infection and Disease in Immunized Mice
Five to six weeks after the initial immunization, mice were challenged intravaginally with HSV-2 strain G at 50 LD50 (5×105 PFU/mouse). Vaginal swabs were taken on days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 after challenge. Mice were observed during a 21-day follow-up period for the incidence of genital and disseminated HSV-2 disease. As shown in
The results in
All references cited herein are fully incorporated by reference. Having now fully described the invention, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that the invention may be practiced within a wide and equivalent range of conditions, parameters and the like, without affecting the spirit or scope of the invention or any embodiment thereof.
This application is a continuation application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/517,232 filed Jun. 19, 2012, which is a 35 U.S.C. §371 National Phase Entry Application of International Application No. PCT/US10/61320 filed Dec. 20, 2010, which designates the U.S., and which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional No. 61/288,836 filed Dec. 21, 2009, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5464758 | Gossen | Nov 1995 | A |
5589362 | Bujard | Dec 1996 | A |
5763217 | Cynader et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770414 | Gage et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5917122 | Byrne | Jun 1999 | A |
5965440 | Reeves | Oct 1999 | A |
5972650 | Yao | Oct 1999 | A |
6027730 | Francotte et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6183753 | Cochran et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6251640 | Yao | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261552 | De Luca | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6444871 | Yao | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6635478 | Hippenmeyer et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6846670 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7223411 | Knipe et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
8236941 | Yao | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020028484 | Yao | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030113348 | Coffin | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030165537 | Fehler et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040029229 | Reeves et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040063094 | Coffin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040229362 | Epstein et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050266564 | Yao | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060116340 | Lewin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080008686 | Yao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080299140 | Georges | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100015687 | Yao | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20120190106 | Yao | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1065997 | Nov 1992 | CN |
1503843 | Jun 2004 | CN |
WO 9404672 | Mar 1994 | WO |
2004029258 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2011025717 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011079073 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Preston CM, Nicholl MJ. Repression of gene expression upon infection of cells with herpes simplex virus type 1 mutants impaired for immediate-early protein synthesis. J Virol. Oct. 1997;71(10):7807-13. |
Lu Z, Brans R, Akhrameyeva NV, Murakami N, Xu X, Yao F. High-level expression of glycoprotein D by a dominant-negative HSV-1 virus augments its efficacy as a vaccine against HSV-1 infection. J Invest Dermatol. May 2009;129(5):1174-84. Epub Nov. 13, 2008. |
McGeoch DJ. UL9 [Human herpesvirus 1]. GenBank Acc. No: CAA32345.1. Dep. Oct. 23, 2008. |
Armentano, et al., E4ORF3 Requirement for Achieving Long-Term Transgene Expression from the Cytomegalovirus Promoter in Adenovirus Vectors, Journal of Virology, vol. 73, pp. 7031-7034, 1999. |
Baron, et al., Co-regulation of two gene activities by tetracycline via a bidrectional promoter, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 23, pp. 3605-3606, 1995. |
Baskar, et al., Developmental Analysis of the Cytomegalovirus Enhancer in Transgenic Animals, Journal of Virology 70(5):3215-3226, May 1996. |
Boshart, et al., A Very Strong Enhancer is Located Upstream of an Immediate Early Gene of Human Cytomegaloviurs, Cell 41:521-530, Jun. 1985. |
Foecking, et al., Powerful and Versatile Enhancer-Promoter Unit for Mammalian Expression Vectors, Gene 45:101-105, 1986. |
Klucher, et al., Sequences in human cytomegalovirus 2.7-kilobase RNA promoter which mediate its regulation as an early gene, Journal of Virology, vol. 63, pp. 5334-5343. |
Koedood, et al., Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) Immediate-Early Enhancer/Promoter Specificity During Embryogenesis Defines Target Tissues of Congenital HCMV Infection, Journal of Virology 69(4):2194-2207, Apr. 1995. |
Kwissa, et al., Polyvalent DNA Vaccines With Bidrectional Promoters, Journal of Molecular Medicine, 78:495-506, 2000. |
Ramos, et al., The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 69, pp. 326-356, 2005. |
Schmidt, et al., The Cytomegalovirus Enhancer: A Pan-Active Control Element in Transgenic Mice, Molecular and Cellular Biology 10(8):4406-4411, Aug. 1990. |
Stinkski, et al., Activation of the Major Immediate Early Gene of Human Cytomegalovirus by cis-Acting Elements in the Promoter-Regulatory Sequence by Virus-Specific trans-Acting Components, Journal of Virology 55(2):431-441, Aug. 1985. |
Yao et al., Human Gene Therapy, 10(11):1811-1818 (1999). “A novel anti-herpes simplex virus type 1-specific herpes simplex virus type 1 recombinant.”. |
Herrlinger et al., J. Gene. Med., 2(5):379-389 (2000). “HSV-1 infected cell proteins influence tetracycline regulated transgene expression.” |
Loser et al. , Eur. J. Immunol., 34(7): 2022-2031 (2004). “Enhanced contact hypersensitivity and antiviral immune responses in vivo by keratinocyte-targeted overexpression of IL-15.” |
Preston et al., Virology, 229(1):228-239 (1997). “Construction and characterization of herpes simplex virus type 1 mutants with conditional defects in immediate early gene expression.” |
Resnick et al., J. Virol., 63(3):2497-2503 (1989). “DNA binding by the herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP4 protein is necessary for efficient down regulation of the ICPO promoter.” |
Roberts, et al., J. Virol., 62(11):4307-4320 (1988). “Direct correlation between a negative autoregulatory response element at the cap site of the herpes simplex virus type 1 1E175 (alpha 4) promoter and a specific binding site for the 1E175 (ICP4) protein.” |
Toka, et al., Virology, 331(1):151-158 (2005). “Rescue of memory CD8+ T cell reactivity in peptide/TLR9 ligand immunization by codelivery of cytokines or CD40 ligation.” |
Kemble G, et al. Herpes simplex vaccines. In: Arvin A, Campadelli-Fiume G, Mocarski E, et al., editors. Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Chapter 69. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47451/?report=printable. |
English translation of Office Action sent Apr. 24, 2013 for corresponding Chinese application 201080058385.7, with Search Report and claims currently pending in China attached. |
Brinster, et al., “Regulation of metallothionein-thymidine kinase fusion plasmids injected into mouse eggs,” Nature 296(4):39-42 (Mar. 1982). |
Brown, et al., “lac Repressor Can Regulate Expression from a Hybrid SV40 Early Promoter Containing a lac Operator in Animal Cells,” Cell 49:603-612 (Jun. 1987). |
Ghosh, et al., “Expanding Adeno-associated Viral Vector Capacity: A Tale of Two Vectors,” Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 24:165-178 (2007). |
Klock, et al., “Oestrogen and glucocorticoid responsive elements are closely related but distinct,” Nature 329(22):734-736 (Oct. 1987). |
Labow, et al., “Conversion of the lac Repressor into an Allosterically Regulated Transcriptional Activator for Mammalian Cells,” Mol. Cell. Biol. 10(7):3343-3356 (Jul. 1990). |
Le, et al., “Inducible Expression of Cre Recombinase in the Retinal Pigmented Epithelium,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 49(3):1248-1253 (2008). |
Nover, in Heat Shock Response, pp. 167-220, CRC, Fla. (1991). |
Radomska, et al., “Transgenic targeting with regulatory elements of the human CD34 gene,” Blood 100(13):4410-4419 (Dec. 2002). |
Abu-Raddad, et al., “Genital Herpes has Played a More Important Role than Any Other Sexually Transmitted Infection in Driving HIV Prevalence in Africa,” PLoS One 3(5)(e2230):1-15 (May 2008). |
Ackermann, et al., “Characterization of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 α Proteins, 0, 4, and 27 with Monoclonal Antibodies,” J. Virol. 52(1):108-118 (Oct. 1984). |
Adelson, et al., “Simultaneous detection of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 by real-time PCR and Pyrosequencing,”J. Clin. Virol. 33:25-34 (2005). |
Advani, et al., “Friendly Fire: Redirecting Herpes Simplex Virus-1 for Therapeutic Applications,” Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8:551-563 (2002). |
Akhrameyeva, et al., “Development of a Glycoprotein D-Expressing Dominant-Negative and Replication-Defective Herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV-2) Recombinant Viral Vaccine against HSV-2 Infection in Mice,” J. Virol. 85(10):5036-5047 (May 2011). |
Anderson, W.F., “Human Gene Therapy,” Nature (London) 392:25-30 (1998). |
Arvin, et al., “Detection of Type-Specific Antibody to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 by Radioimmunoassay with Herpes Simples Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein C Purified with Monoclonal Antibody,” Infect. Immun. 40(1): 184-189 (1983). |
Augustinova, et al., “The Dominant-Negative Herpes Simplex Virus Type I (HSV-I) Recombinant CJ83193 can Serve as an Effective Vaccine against Wild-Type HSV-1 Infection in Mice,” J. Virol. 78(11):5756-5765 (Jun. 2004). |
Berens, et al., “Gene regulation by tetracyclines: Constraints of resistance regulation in bacteria shape TetR for application in eukaryotes,” Eur. J. Biochem. 270:3109-3121 (2003). |
Bourne, et al., “DNA immunization confers protective immunity on mice challenged intravaginally with herpes simplex virus type 2,” Vaccine 14(13):1230-1234 (1996). |
Brans, et al., “Prevention of Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and 2 Disease in Mice Immunized with gD-Expressing Dominant-Negative Recombinant HSV-1,”J. Invest. Dermatol. 129:2470-2479 (2009). |
Brans, et al., “Immunization with a Dominant-Negative Recombinant HSV Type 1 Protects against HSV-1 Skin Disease in Guinea Pigs,” J. Invest. Dermatol. 128:2825-2832 (2008). |
Bryson, et al., “Risk of Acquisition of Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in Sex Partners of Persons with Genital Herpes: A Prospective Couple Study,”J. Infect. Dis. 167:942-946 (1993). |
Cai, et al., “The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Regulatory Protein ICPO Enhances Virus Replication during Acute Infection and Reactivation from Latency,”J. Virol. 67(72):7501-7512 (Dec. 1993). |
Cai, et al., “The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 ICPO Plays a Critical Role in the De Novo Synthesis of Infectious Virus following Transfection of Viral DNA,” J. Virol. 63(11):4579-4589 (Nov. 1989). |
Clackson, T., “Regulated Gene Expression Systems,” Gene Therapy 7:120-125 (2000). |
Cohen, J., “Bumps on the Vaccine Road,” Science 265:1371-1373 (Sep. 1994). |
Cohen, et al., “Localization and Synthesis of an Antigenic Determinant of Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D that Stimulates the Production of Neutralizing Antibody,” J. Virol. 49(1):102-108 (Jan. 1984). |
Coleman, et al., “Determination of Herpes Simplex Virus Type-Specific Antibodies by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 18(2):287-291 (Aug. 1983). |
Cooper, et al., “Epitope mapping of full-length glycoprotein D from HSV-2 reveals a novel CD4+ CTL epitope located at the transmembrane-cytoplasmic junction,” Cell Immunol. 239:113-120 (2006). |
Corbel, et al., “Latest developments and in vivo use of the Tet system: ex vivo and in vivo delivery of tetracycline-regulated genes,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 13:448-452 (2002). |
Corey, et al., “Infections with Herpes Simplex Viruses,” N. Eng. J. Med. 314:749-757 (1986). |
Davido, et al., “Role of Cis-Acting Sequences of the ICPO Promoter of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Viral Pathogenesis, Latency and Reactivation,” J. General Virology 77:1853-1863 (1996). |
DeLuca, et al., “Physical and Functional Domains of the Herpes Simplex Virus Transcriptional Regulatory Protein ICP4,” J. Virol. 62(3):732-743 (Mar. 1988). |
Deuschle, et al., “Tetracycline-Reversible Silencing of Eukaryotic Promoters,” Mol. and Cel. Biol. 15:1907-1914 (Apr. 1995). |
Dolan, et al., “The Genome Sequence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2,” J. Virol. 72(3):2010-2021 (Mar. 1998). |
Dudek, et al., “Replication-defective viruses as vaccines and vaccine vectors,” Virology 344:230-239 (2006). |
Fleming, etal., “Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994,” N. Eng. J. Med. 337(16):1105-1111 (1997). |
Fox, J.L., “Investigation of Gene Therapy Begins,” Nature Biotechnology 18:143-144 (Feb. 2000). |
Freeman, et al., “Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies,” Aids 20:73-83 (2006). |
Glorioso, et al., “Immunogenicity of Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoproteins gC and gB and their Role in Protective Immunity,” J. Virol. 50(3):805-812 (Jun. 1984). |
Glorioso, et al., “Therapeutic Gene Transfer to the Nervous System Using Viral Vectors,” J. NeuroVirol. 9:165-172 (2003). |
Gossen, et al., “Transcriptional Activation by Tetracyclines in Mammalian Cells,” Science 268:1766-1769 (Jun. 1995). |
Gossen, et al., “Tight Control of Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells by Tetracycline-Responsive Promoters,” Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 89:5547-5551 (Jun. 1992). |
Grammer, et al., “Identification of an HSV-1/HSV-2 Cross-Reactive T Cell Determinant,” J. Immunol. 145(7):2249-2253 (Oct. 1990). |
Gupta, et al., “Genital Herpes,” Lancet 370:2127-2137 (Dec. 2007). |
Handler, et at, “Oligometric Structure of Glycoproteins in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1,” J. Virol. 70(9):6067-6075 (Sep. 1996). |
Hennighausen, et al., “Conditional Gene Expression in Secretory Tissues and Skin of Transgenic Mice Using the MMTV-LTR and the Tetracycline Responsive System,” J. Cell. Biochem 59:463-472 (1995). |
Heur, et al., “Tet Repressor-tet Operator Contacts Probed by Operator DNA-modification Interference Studies,” J. Mol Biol. 202:407-415 (1988). |
Hillen, et al., “Mechanisms Underlying Expression of TN10 Encoded Tetracycline Resistance,” Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 48:345-369 (1994). |
Hirsch, “Herpes Simplex Virus,” p. 1144-1153. In G.L. Mandell, R.G.J. Douglas and J.E. Bennett (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone Inc., New York (1990). |
Honess, el al., “Type Specific and Type Common Antigens in Cells Infected with Herpes Simplex Virus Type I and on the Surfaces of Naked and Enveloped Particles of the Virus,” J. gen. Virol. 22:159-169 (1974). |
Hosken, et al., “Diversity of the CD8+ T-Cell Response to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Proteins among Persons with Genital Herpes,” J. Virol. 80(11):5509-5515 (Jun. 2006). |
Jacobs, et al., “HSV-1-Based Vectors for Gene Therapy of Neurological Diseases and Brain Tumors: Part I. HSV-1 Structure, Replication and Pathogenesis,” Neoplasia 1(5):387-401 (1999). |
Jacobs, et al., “HSV-1-Based Vectors for Gene Therapy of Neurological Diseases and Brain Tumors: Part 11. Vector Systems and Applications,” Neoplasia 1(5):402-416 (1999). |
Johnson, et al., “Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D is Recognized as Antigen by CD4+ and CD8+ T Lymphocytes from Infected Mice,” J. Immunol. I45(2):702-710 (Jul. 1990). |
Jones, et al., “Vaccination Strategies to Prevent Genital Herpes and Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Disease,” Herpes 11(1):12-17 (2004). |
Kim, et al., “Immunodominant Epitopes in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Glycoprotein D are Recognized by CD4 Lymphocytes from Both HSV-1 and HSV-2 Seropositive Subjects,” J. Immunol. 181:6604-6615 (2008). |
Kim, et al., “Tetracycline Repressor-Regulated Gene Repression in Recombinant Human Cytomegalovirus,”J. Virol. 69(4):2565-2573 (1995). |
Kmiec, et al., “Investigators Have Been Searching for Ways to Add Corrective Genes to Cells Harboring Defective Genes. A Better Strategy Might be to Correct the Defects,” American Scientist 87:240-247 (May 1999). |
Knopf, et al., “Evaluation of the T-REx™ transcription switch for conditional expression and regulation of HSV-1 vectors,” Virus Genes 36:55-66 (2008). |
Koelle, et al., “Herpes Simplex: Insights on Pathogenesis and Possible Vaccines,” Annu. Rev. Med. 59:381-395 (2008). |
Koelle, el al., “Recent Progress in Herpes Simplex Virus Immunobiology and Vaccine Research,” Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16(1):96-113 (Jan. 2003). |
Koelle, el al., “Prospects for Developing an Effective Vaccine Against Ocular Herpes Simplex Virus Infection,” Curr. Eye Res. 30:929-942 (2005). |
Koelle, et al., “Herpes Simplex Virus Infection of Human Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes Inhibits Recognition by Cloned CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes,” J. Clin. Invest. 91:961-968 (Mar. 1993). |
Kousoulas, et al., “Antibody-Resistant Mutations in Cross-Reactive and Type-Specific Epitopes of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein B Map in Separate Domains,” Virology 166:423-431 (1988). |
Lakeman, et al., “Analysis of DNA From Recurrent Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Isolates by Restriction Endonuclease Digestion,” Sex. Transm. Dis. 13:61-66 (1986). |
Latchman, et al., “Herpes Simplex Virus Vectors for Gene Delivery to a Variety of Different Cell Types,”Curr. Gene Ther. 2:415-426 (2002). |
Leib, et al., “Immediate-Early Regulatory Gene Mutants Define Different Stages in the Establishment and Reactivation of Herpes Simplex Virus Latency,”J. Virol. 63(2):759-768 (Feb. 1989). |
Lewandowski, et al., “Evidence that deficient IFN-γ production is a biological basis of herpes simplex virus type-2 neurovirulence,” J.Neuroimmunol. 81:66-75 (1998). |
Liesegang, “Herpes Simplex Virus Epidemiology and Ocular Importance,” Cornea 20(1):1-13 (2001). |
Looker, et al., “A systematic review of the epidemiology and interaction of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2,” Sex. Transm. Infect. 81:103-107 (2005). |
Lu, et al., “High Level Expression of Glycoprotein D by a Dominant-Negative HSV-1 Virus Augments its Efficacy as a Vaccine against HSV-1 Infection,” J. Invest. Dermatol. 129:1174-1184 (2009). |
Martinez, et al., “The Conserved Helicase Motifs of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Origin-Binding Protein UL9 Are Important for Function,” Journal of Virology 66(11):6735-6746 (Nov. 1992). |
Martuza, et al., “Experimental Therapy of Human Glioma by Means of a Genetically Engineered Virus Mutant,” Science 252:854-856 (1991). |
McGeoch, et al., “The Complete DNA Sequence of the Long Unique Region in the Genome of Herpes Simplex Virus Type I,” J. Gen. Virol. 69:1531-1574 (1988). |
McGeoch, et al., “Complete DNA Sequence of the Short Repeat Region in the Genome of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1,” Nuc. Acids Res. 14(4):1727-1745 (1986). |
McGeoch, et al., “Comparative Sequence Analysis of the Long Repeat Regions and Adjoining Parts of the Long Unique Regions in the Genomes of Herpes Simplex Viruses Types 1 and 2,” J. Gen. Viral. 72:3057-3075 (1991). |
McGeoch, et al., “DNA sequence of the region in the genome of herpes simplex virus type 1 containing the exonuclease and neighbouring genes,” Nucl. Acid Res. 14(8):3435-48 (1986). |
Mertz, el al., “Risk Factors for the Sexual Transmission of Genital Herpes,” Ann. Intern. Med. 116:197-202 (1992). |
Mikloska, et al., “Herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins gB, gC and gD are major targets for CD4 T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity in HLA-DR expressing human epidermal keratinocytes,” J. gen. Viro. 79:353-361 (1998). |
Mikloska, et al., “Monophosphoryl Lipid A and QS21 Increase CD8 T Lymphocyte Cytotoxicity to Herpes Simplex Virus-2 Infected Cell Proteins 4 and 27 Through IFN-1γ and IL-12 Production,” J. Immunol. 164:5167-5176 (2000). |
Minson, et al., “An Analysis of the Biological Properties of Monoclonal Antibodies against Glycoprotein D of Herpes Simplex Virus and Identification of Amino Acid Substitutions that Confer Resistance to Neutralization,”J. gen. Virol. 67:1001-1013 (1986). |
Morrison, et al., “Influence of Mucosal and Parenteral Immunization with a Replication-Defective Mutant of HSV-2 on Immune Responses and Protection from Genital Challenge,” Virology 243:178-187 (1998). |
Muller, “Binding of the Herpes Simplex Virus Immediate-Early Gene Product ICP4 to Its Own Transcription Start Site,” J. Virol. 61(3):858-865 (Mar. 1987). |
Nagot, et al., “Reduction of HIV-1 RNA Levels with Therapy to Suppress Herpes Simplex Virus,” N. Engl. J. Med. 356(8):790-799 (Feb. 2007). |
No, et al., “Ecdysone-Inducible Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells and Transgenic Mice,” Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 93:3346-3351 91996). |
Palmer, et al., “Development and Optimization of Herpes Simplex Virus Vectors for Multiple Long-Term Gene Delivery to the Peripheral Nervous System,” J. Virol. 74(12):5604-5618 (Jun. 2000). |
Para, et al., “Potent Neutralizing Activity Associated with Anti-Glycoprotein D Specificity Among Monoclonal Antibodies Selected for Binding to Herpes Simplex Virions,” J. Virol. 55(2):483-488 (Aug. 1985). |
Pereira, “Use of monoclonal antibodies to HSV-I and HSV-2 for serological analysis of the viral glycoproteins,” Dev. Biol. Stand. 52:115-131 (1982). |
Pereira, et al., “Type-Common and Type-Specific Monoclonal Antibody to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1,” Infect. Immun. 29(2):724-732 (Aug. 1980). |
Perry, et al., “Characterization of the IE110 Gene of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1,” J. Gen Virol. 67:2365-2380 (1986). |
Postle, et al., “Nucleotide Sequence of the Repressor Gene of the TN10 Tetracycline Resistance Determinant,” Nuc. Acids Res. 12(12):4849-4863 (1985). |
Rivera, etal., “A Humanized System for Pharmacologic Control of Gene Expression,” Nature Medicine 2(9):1028-1032 (1996). |
Roberts, et al., “Direct Correlation between a Negative Autoregulatory Response Element at the Cap Site of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 IE175 (α4) Promoter and a Specific Binding Site for the IE175 (ICP4) Protein,” J. Virol. 62(11):4307-4320 (Nov. 1988). |
Roizman, et al., “Herpes Simplex Viruses and Their Replication,” Chapter 72, pp. 2399-2459; D.M. Knipe (ed.), Fields Virology, 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. (2001). |
Ross, et al., “Gene Therapy in the United States: A Five-Year Status Report,” Human Gene Therapy 7:1781-1790 (Sep. 1996). |
Scarpini, et at., “Latency Associated Promoter Transgene Expression in the Central Nervous System After Stereotaxic Delivery of Replication-Defective HSV-1-Based Vectors,” Gene Therapy 8:1057-1071 (2001). |
Schmeisser, et al., “Tetracycline-Regulated Gene Expression in Replication-Incompetent Herpes Simplex Virus Vectors,” Hum. Gene Ther. 13:2113-2124 ( Dec. 2002). |
Schmidt, et al., “Reinfection is an Uncommon Occurrence in Patients with Symptomatic Recurrent Genital Herpes,” J. Infect. Dis. 149(4):645-646 (Apr. 1984). |
Stanberry, “Clinical Trials of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Herpes Simplex Virus Vaccines,” Herpes 11; (Suppl 3):161A-169A (2004). |
Stanberry, et al., “Prospects for Control of Herpes Simplex Virus Disease through Immunization,” Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:549-566 (2000). |
Stanberry, et al., “Glycoprotein-D-Adjuvant Vaccine to Prevent Genital Herpes,” N. Engl. J. Med. 347(21):1652-1661 (Nov. 2002). |
Starr, et al., “Long-term persistence of defective HSV-1 vectors in the rat brain is demonstrated by reactivation of vector gene expression,” Gene Ther. 3:615-623 (1996). |
Stow, et al., “Isolation and Characterization of a Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Mutant Containing a Deletion within the Gene Encoding the Immediate Early Polypeptide Vmw110,” J. gen. Virol. 67:2571-2585 (1986). |
Tigges, et al., “Human CD8+ Herpes Simplex Virus-Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Clones Recognize Diverse Virion Protein Antigens,” J. Virol. 66(3):1622-1634 (Mar. 1992). |
Verma, et al., “Gene Therapy-Promises, Problems, and Prospects,” Nature 389:239-242 (Sep. 1997). |
Wang, et al., “A Regulatory System for Use in Gene Transfer,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:8180-8184 (1994). |
Wang, et al., “Mammary Hyperplasia and Carcinoma in MMTV-Cyclin D1 Transgenic Mice,” Nature 369:669-671 (Jun. 1994). |
Whitley, et al., “Herpes Simplex Viruses,” Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:541-53; quiz 554-55 (1998). |
Wissman, et al., “Saturation Mutagenesis of the Tn10-Encoded tet Operator O1, Identification of Base-Pairs Involved in Tet Repressor Recognition,” J. Mol. Biol. 202:397-406 (1988). |
Xu, et al., “Seroprevalence and Coinfection with Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in the United States, 1988-1994,” J. Infect. Dis. 185:1019-1024 (2002). |
Yao, et al., “A Novel Anti-Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1-Specific Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Recombinant,” Hum. Gene Ther. 10:1811-1818 (Jul. 1999). |
Yao, et al., “A Novel Tetracycline-Inducible Viral Replication Switch,” Hum. Gene Ther. 10:419-427 (Feb. 1999). |
Yao, et al., “Inhibition of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) viral replication by the dominant negative mutant polypeptide of HSV-1 origin binding protein,” Antiviral Res. 53:127-33 (2002). |
Yao, et al., “An Activity Specified by the Osterosarcoma Line U2OS Can Substitute Functionally for ICPO, a Major Regulatory Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1,”J. Virol. 69(10):6249-6258 (1995). |
Yao, et al., “Tetracycline Repressor, tetR, rather than the tetR-Mammalian Cell Transcription Factor Fusion Derivatives, Regulates Inducible Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells,” Human Gene Ther. 9:1939-1950 (Sep. 1998). |
Yao, et al., “Physical Interaction Between the Herpes Simplex Virus Type I Immediate-Early Regulatory Proteins ICPO and ICP4,” J. Virol. 68:8158-8168 (1994). |
Yao, et al., “Highly Efficient Regulation of Gene Expression by Tetracycline in a Replication-Defective Herpes Simplex Viral Vector,” Mol. Ther. 13(4):1133-1141 (Jun. 2006). |
Zarling, et al., “Human Cytotoxic T Cell Clones Directed Against Herpes Simplex Virus-Infected Cells,” J. Immunol. 136(12):4669-4673 (Jun. 1986). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/061320 filed Dec. 20, 2010. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2010/061320 filed Dec. 20, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2010/061320 filed Dec. 20, 2010. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2007 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Office Action of Jun. 12, 2007 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375, filed by Applicant on Sep. 12, 2007. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2007 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Office Action of Nov. 27, 2007 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375, filed by Applicant on Feb. 24, 2008. |
Appeal Brief filed by Applicant on May 27, 2008 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2008 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Office Action of Oct. 15, 2008 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375, filed by Applicant on Feb. 24, 2008. |
Notice of Noncompliant Amendment mailed Apr. 21, 2009 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Notice of Noncompliant Amendment of Apr. 21, 2009 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375, filed by Applicant on May 4, 2009. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2009 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Office Action of Nov. 9, 2009 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375, filed by Applicant with RCE on Feb. 10, 2010. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2010 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Office Action of Aug. 5, 2010 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375, filed by Applicant on Nov. 10, 2010. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 20, 2011 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Response to Office Action of Jan. 20, 2011 filed in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375 on May 20, 2011 along with an RCE. |
Declaration Under 37 CFR §1.132 filed in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375 on May 20, 2011. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2011 in the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,375. |
Appeal Brief filed by Applicant on Nov. 26, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,357. |
Examiner's Answer mailed by the USPTO on Feb. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,357. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140314811 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61288836 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13517232 | US | |
Child | 14320923 | US |