Heterocyclic lipoxin analogs and uses thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11161824
  • Patent Number
    11,161,824
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 18, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 2, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a compound of formula (I): wherein L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group excluding unsubstituted monocyclic pyridine groups; wherein a is 0, 1 or 2; wherein R1 is H or with R2 is a bond; wherein R2 is an optionally substituted alkoxy or aryloxy group, or with R1 forms a bond; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and wherein R4 is CH2, CMe2 or O. Such compounds may be used in the treatment or prophylaxis of a disease or condition in which inhibition of acute inflammation and/or promotion of its resolution and/or suppression of fibrosis.
Description
FIELD

The invention relates to compounds comprising synthetic analogues of Lipoxin A4 (LXA4), which display significant biological activity and metabolic stability. These compounds may be useful in the development of a range of therapies, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, anti-atherosclerotic and/or immunomodulatory agents.


BACKGROUND

In 1984, a new class of arachidonic acid metabolites was isolated by Samuelsson and Serhan (1). These molecular agents, named Lipoxin A4 and B4, are produced by transcellular metabolism of eicosanoid derivatives. Lipoxins (herein after referred to as LX) are typically formed by the sequential actions of 15- and 5-, or 5- and 12-lipoxygenases on arachidonic acid, depending on the cellular context (2). These compounds are biologically important with LX being observed in many human diseases, including asthma, glomerulonephritis and rheumatoid arthritis (3-6). Both in vivo and in vitro studies show that lipoxins regulate polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN), chemotaxis, adhesion and transmigration (7-10). LXA4 appears to block some leukocyte response to leukotrienes including PNM adhesion mediated by CD11/CD18 expression and endothelial neutrophil adhesion dependent on endothelial P-selection and PNM-mesangial cell adhesion (10,11). The inventors of the present invention have previously demonstrated that LXs are involved in the resolution of inflammation by promoting non-phlogistic phagocytosis of apoptotic PMN by macrophages in vitro and in vivo (12,13). Furthermore the inventors have shown distinct fibrosuppressant activities of LXs in experimental models (13a, 13b). Consistent with a biological role for LXs in the resolution of inflammation is evidence that their production at an inflammatory focus is coincident with the resolution of inflammation (14,15).


LX are rapidly metabolised either by oxidation at C-15 or reduction of the C13-C14 double bond (16). 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) catalyses the dehydrogenation of the C-15 hydroxyl to afford the corresponding ketone 15-oxo-LXA4. Alternatively, leukotriene B4 12-hydroxydehydrogenase (PGR/LTB4DH) may catalyse the reduction of the C13-C14 double bond of LXA4 or 15-oxo-LXA4 to give 13,14-dihydro-LXA4 or 13,14-dihydro-15-oxo-LXA4 respectively. LX are also subject to □-oxidation at C20 (17).


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have recognised that the instability of endogenously generated lipoxins and their difficult/costly synthesis is a significant obstacle to their use as pharmaceutical entities. To overcome these problems the inventors have sought to mimic the core structure of LXA4 by replacing certain functionalities with alternative groups with the aim of improving the metabolic stability of the compounds whilst retaining their potent biological activity, as shown in Scheme 1 below.




embedded image


The strategies include (A) structural modifications of the C15-20 chain; (B) replacement of the triene with chemically stable aromatic/heteroaromatic systems: and (C) modifications of the C1-8 unit (18).


It is therefore one aim of the present invention, amongst others, to provide a compound, composition, use or method that addresses at least one disadvantage of the prior art, whether identified here or elsewhere, or to provide an alternative to existing compounds, compositions, uses or methods. For instance it may be an aim of the present invention to provide a compound which has an improved metabolic stability compared to lipoxin and has sufficient biological activity to enable the inhibition of acute inflammation and/or the promotion of its resolution and/or the suppression of fibrosis.


It may be a further or an alternative aim of the present invention to provide a compound for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of asthma and/or glomerulonephritis and/or atherosclerosis.


It may be a further or an alternative aim of the present invention to provide a compound for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of the macro and/or microvascular complications associated with metabolic diseases, for example diabetes.


According to aspects of the present invention, there is provided a compound, composition, use or method as set forth in the appended claims. Other features of the invention will be apparent from the dependent claims, and the description which follows.


According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a compound of formula (I):




embedded image


wherein L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group excluding unsubstituted monocyclic pyridine groups;


wherein a is 0, 1 or 2;


wherein R1 is H or with R2 is a bond;


wherein R2 is OH or an optionally substituted alkoxy or aryloxy group, or with R1 forms a bond;


wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and


wherein R4 is CH2, CMe2 or O.


L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group which provides a link between the upper and lower chains of the compounds of this first aspect. Therefore L has a bond to each of the upper and lower chains. By “upper chain” we mean the portion:




embedded image


By lower chain we mean the portion:




embedded image


Suitably L bonds to the upper and lower chains through different atoms. Suitably L bonds to the upper and lower chains through carbon atoms. Suitably L bonds to the upper and lower chains through adjacent atoms in the heterocyclic group, therefore having the upper and lower chains arranged in a “1,2 substitution” on the heterocyclic group. L may bond to the upper and lower chains through atoms in the heterocyclic group which are one atom apart, therefore having the upper and lower chains arranged in a “1,3 substitution” on the heterocyclic group. L may bond to the upper and lower chains through atoms in the heterocyclic group which are two atoms apart, therefore having the upper and lower chains arranged in a “1,4 substitution” on the heterocyclic group.


L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group by which we mean that the heterocyclic group may have any number and combination of substituents on the appropriate atoms to which the upper and lower chains are not bonded.


L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group excluding optionally substituted monocyclic pyridine groups. Therefore L is not a pyridine ring but may be a heterocyclic group which contains a pyridine ring as part of a larger heterocyclic ring system, for example a quinoline group.


L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group excluding unsubstituted monocyclic pyridine groups. Therefore L is not an unsubstituted monocyclic pyridine group. Suitably L is an optionally substituted heterocyclic group excluding optionally substituted monocyclic pyridine groups. Therefore, suitably L is not an optionally substituted monocyclic pyridine group.


R1 may with R2 form a bond. Therefore optionally the atoms to which the R1 and R2 groups are attached may be joined by a bond in some embodiments.


The compound according to claim 1, wherein L is selected from an optionally substituted pyrimidine, quinoline, isoquinoline, quinazoline, five-membered heterocyclic ring or benzo-fused five membered heterocyclic ring.


In some embodiments, L is selected from an unsubstituted pyrimidine, quinoline, isoquinoline, quinazoline, five-membered heterocyclic ring or benzo-fused five membered heterocyclic ring.


Suitably L is selected from an unsubstituted pyrimidine, quinoline, isoquinoline or quinazoline.


In some embodiments L is selected from the optionally substituted heterocyclic groups:




embedded image


wherein X is selected from C or N,


wherein Y is selected from C or N, and


wherein at least one of X and Y is N.


In this context by optionally substituted we mean that the H atoms attached to the heterocyclic ring atoms may be replaced with a suitable substituent, for example alkyl groups, alkoxy groups or halogens.


The incomplete bonds shown in these structures show where the upper and lower chains are connected to the group L. The arrangement of the incomplete bonds does not specifically define which of the incomplete bonds is the bond to the upper chain and which to the lower chain. Therefore either of the incomplete bonds in these structures can be to the upper chain or the lower chain.


Suitably L is selected from the unsubstituted heterocyclic groups:




embedded image


In some embodiments L is the optionally substituted group:




embedded image


wherein Z is selected from N, O and S.


In some embodiments L is:




embedded image


wherein V is selected from NR5, O and S; wherein R5 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group;


wherein W is selected from CR6, N, O and S; wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group; and


wherein U is selected from CR7 or N; wherein R7 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R5 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.




embedded image



wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


R2 is OH an optionally substituted alkoxy or aryloxy group, or with R1 forms a bond. Suitably R2 is a C1-4 alkoxy group. Therefore the compound of this first aspect is suitably an ester with the R2 group and the adjacent carbonyl group provided the ester group. Suitably R2 is OCH3, OCH2CH3 or OCH(CH3)2.


R1 may with R2 form a bond. Therefore in some embodiments the compound of this first aspect may have the formula (II):




embedded image


Suitably, R4 is CH2. Suitably a is 1.


In some embodiments R3 is an optionally substituted C1-9 alkyl group. Suitably R3 is an optionally substituted C3-7 alkyl group. Suitably R3 is an unsubstituted C1-9 alkyl group, suitably an unsubstituted C3-7 alkyl group.


In some embodiments R3 comprises an aryloxy group, suitably an optionally substituted phenoxy group.


Suitably R3 has the formula (IIIa):




embedded image


wherein R6 is selected from H, OH, CN, halogens and optionally substituted alkyl, aryl, alkoxy, amino, sulphide, sulphoxide and sulphonate groups.


Suitably R3 has the formula (III):




embedded image


Suitably R6 is selected from H, F and CF3.


The stereochemistry of the chiral centres on the upper chain of the compound of this first aspect are as shown in formula (I). The stereochemistry of the chiral centre on the lower chain of the compound of this first aspect may be either in the R or S form or be a mixture of the two, for example an approximately equal mixture of the R and S diastereoisomers. Suitably the compound of this first aspect is provided as substantially one diastereoisomer, for example in a diasteromeric excess of at least 90%, suitably at least 95%, suitably at least 99%.


In some embodiments, the compound of this first aspect has the R stereochemistry at the chiral centre in the lower chain. Therefore, suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (IV):




embedded image


In some embodiments, the compound of this first aspect has the S stereochemistry at the chiral centre in the lower chain. Therefore, suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (V):




embedded image


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIaa):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIa):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIbb):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIb):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIbb2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIb2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIcc):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIc):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VId):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIe):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIff):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIf):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIgg):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (Vg):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIhh):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIh):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIii):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIi):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIjj):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIj):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIjj2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIj2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIkk):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIk):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VImm):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group; and wherein R5 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIm):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group; and wherein R5 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (Vimm2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group; and wherein R5 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (Vim2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group; and wherein R5 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VInn):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (Vn):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIoo):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIo):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIoo2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIo2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIpp):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIp):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIqq):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIq):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIqq2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group and wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIq2):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIrr):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; wherein R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


Suitably the compound of this first aspect has the formula (VIr):




embedded image


wherein R2 is OH or a C1-4 alkoxy group; and wherein R6 is H or an optionally substituted alkyl or aryl group.


According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a composition comprising a compound according to the first aspect and a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, lubricant or carrier.


Suitable diluents, lubricants and carriers would be known to a person skilled in the relevant art.


According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a compound according to the first aspect or a composition according to the second aspect for use as a medicament.


The compound for use as a medicament of this third aspect may be for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of asthma and/or glomerulonephritis and/or atherosclerosis.


The compound for use as a medicament of this third aspect may be for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of the macro and/or microvascular complications associated with metabolic diseases, for example diabetes.


According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a compound according to the first aspect or a composition according to the second aspect for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of a disease or condition in which inhibition of acute inflammation and/or promotion of its resolution and/or suppression of fibrosis is beneficial.


According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided the use of a compound according to the first aspect for the manufacture of a medicament.


The medicament may be for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of asthma and/or glomerulonephritis and/or atherosclerosis.


The medicament may be for use in the treatment or prophylaxis of of the macro and/or microvascular complications associated with metabolic diseases, for example diabetes.


According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided the use of a compound according to the first aspect for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment or prophylaxis of a disease or condition in which inhibition of acute inflammation and/or promotion of its resolution and/or suppression of fibrosis is beneficial.


According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treatment or prophylaxis of asthma and/or glomerulonephritis and/or atherosclerosis, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound according to the first aspect or a composition according to the second aspect.


According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treatment or prophylaxis of a disease or condition in which inhibition of acute inflammation and/or promotion of its resolution and/or suppression of fibrosis is beneficial, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound according to the first aspect or a composition according to the second aspect.


According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a compound, composition, use or method substantially as described herein.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:



FIGS. 1A-1C are graphs showing imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 attenuating LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with native LXA4 1 (FIG. 1A), imidazole analogues 9 [(1R)-epimer (FIG. 1B) and (1S)-epimer (FIG. 1C)], vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. 108 HKLM was used as positive control for NFkB activation. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. (d) Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001. Graphs display the statistical analysis of the tested compound vs LPS.


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • HKLM=Heat Killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation ctr) (108/ml)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • 1=LXA4 (native compound) (10−12 M-10−6 M)

    • (1R)-5=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−12 M)

    • (1R)-9=(1R) epimer of LXA4-imidazole analogue (10−12 M-10−6 M)

    • (1S)-9=(15) epimer of LXA4-imidazole analogue (10−12 M-10−6 M)






FIG. 2A-2E are graphs showing imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 reduce LPS-induced Th1 cytokine release. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with 10−1 M, 10−9 M or 10−7 M of LXA4 1 and imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-9 and (1S)-9, vehicle or appropriate controls. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and IL1@ (FIG. 2A), IL6 (FIG. 2B), IL12p70 (FIG. 2C), IFNγ (FIG. 2D), and TNF-α (FIG. 2E) levels were measured. Data are expressed as % cytokine secretion relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • 1=LXA4 (native compound) (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)

    • (1R)-5=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−2 M)

    • (1R)-9=(1R) epimer of LXA4-imidazole analogue (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)

    • (1S)-9=(1S) epimer of LXA4-imidazole analogue (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)






FIGS. 3A-3B are graphs illustrating that the imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 do not elicit NFkB-driven luciferase activity in resting conditions. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were treated for 30 min with native (a) LXA4 1, its stable imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-9 and (1S)-9, vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. After 24 h, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3).


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • HKLM=Heat Killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation ctr) (108/ml)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • 1=LXA4 (native compound) (10−9 M)

    • (1R)-5=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−2 M)

    • (1R)-9=(1R) epimer of LXA4-imidazole analogue (10−12 M-10−6 M)

    • (1S)-9=(1S) epimer of LXA4-imidazole analogue (10−12 M-10−6 M)






FIG. 4 shows formula and a graph showing quinoxaline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-CT-4-43 attenuating LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with native (a) LXA4, (b) quinoxaline analogues (1R)-CT-4-43, vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. 107 HKLM was used as positive control for NFkB activation. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. (c) Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001. Graph displays the statistical analysis of the tested compound vs LPS (*) or of the quinoxaline analogue vs the same dose of LXA4 ($).


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • HKLM=Heat Killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation ctr) (107/ml)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • LXA4=native compound (10−2 M-10−6 M)

    • (1R)-BLX=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−2 M)

    • (1R)-CT-4-43=(1R) epimer of LXA4-quinoxaline analogue (10−2 M-10−6 M)






FIG. 5 is a graph showing that the quinoxaline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-CT-4-43 does not elicit NFkB-driven luciferase activity in resting conditions. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were treated for 30 min with native (a) LXA4, its stable imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-CT-4-43, vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. After 24 h, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3).


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • HKLM=Heat Killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation ctr) (107/ml)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • LXA4=native compound (10−2 M-10−6 M)

    • (1R)-BLX=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−2 M)

    • (1R)-CT-4-43=(1R) epimer of LXA4-quinoxaline analogue (10−2 M-10−6 M)






FIG. 6A-6C are graphs showing that quinoxaline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-CT-4-43 inhibits LPS-induced Th1 cytokine release. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with 10−1 M, 10−9 M or 10−7 M of LXA4 and quinoxaline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-CT-4-43, vehicle or appropriate controls. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and IL13 (FIG. 6A), IL6 (FIG. 6B), and IFNγ (FIG. 6C) levels were measured. Data are expressed as % cytokine secretion relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFKB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • 1=LXA4 (native compound) (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)

    • (1R)-5=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−12 M)

    • (1R)-CT-4-43=(1R) epimer of LXA4-quinoxaline analogue (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)






FIG. 7 is of formula and a graph showing that the isoquinoline-lipoxin analogue RB3 attenuates LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with native (a) LXA4, (b) isoquinoline analogues RB3, vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. 107 HKLM was used as positive control for NFkB activation. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. (c) Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001. Graph displays the statistical analysis of the tested compound vs LPS (*) or of the isoquinoline analogue vs the same dose of LXA4 ($).


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • HKLM=Heat Killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation ctr) (107/ml)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • LXA4=native compound (1012 M-10−6 M)

    • (1R)-BLX=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (1012 M)

    • (1R)-RB3=(1R) epimer of LXA4-isoquinoline analogue (1012 M-10−6 M)






FIG. 8 is a graph showing that the isoquinoline-lipoxin analogue RB3 did not elicit NFkB-driven luciferase activity in resting conditions. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were treated for 30 min with native (a) LXA4, its stable imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-RB3, vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. After 24 h, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3).


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • HKLM=Heat Killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation ctr) (107/ml)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • LXA4=native compound (10−2 M-10−6 M)

    • (1R)-BLX=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−2 M)

    • (1R)-RB3=(1R) epimer of LXA4-isoquinoline analogue (10−1 M-10−6 M)






FIG. 9A-9C are graphs showing that the isoquinoline-lipoxin analogue RB3 inhibit LPS-induced Th1 cytokine release. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with 10−11 M, 10−9 M or 10−7 M of LXA4 and isoquinoline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-RB3, vehicle or appropriate controls. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and IL1β(FIG. 9A), IL6 (FIG. 9B), and IL12p70 (FIG. 9C) levels were measured. Data are expressed as % cytokine secretion relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.


Legend





    • Unt=Untreated cells (neg ctr)

    • Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)

    • LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFKB activation ctr) (50 ng/ml)

    • Dex=Dexamethasone (10−6 M)

    • 1=LXA4 (native compound) (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)

    • (1R)-5=(1R) epimer of LXA4-benzoanalogue (10−12 M)

    • RB3=(1R) epimer of LXA4-isoquinoline analogue (10−11 M; 10−9 M; 10−7 M)






FIG. 10 is a graph showing that the quinoxaline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-CT4-68 attenuates LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity.



FIG. 11 is a graph showing that the quinoxaline-lipoxin analogue (1R)-CT4-63 attenuates LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity.



FIG. 12 is a graph showing that the isoquinoline-lipoxin analogue (1S)-DM-178-SB4 attenuates LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity.



FIG. 13 is a graph showing cytotoxicity of quinoxaline-derivatives in presence and absence of LPS-challenge.



FIG. 14 is a graph showing cytotoxicity of isoquinoline-derivatives in presence and absence of LPS-challenge.



FIG. 15 shows the imidazole compound designated KG-5-22 attenuating LPS-induced NFkB-driven luciferase activity. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were pre-treated for 30 min with native LXA4 1 imidazole analogue KG-5-22 vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−1 M up to 10−6 M. 108 HKLM was used as positive control for NFkB activation. After 24 h from stimulation with 50 ng/ml of LPS, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. (d) Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3), *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001. Graphs display the statistical analysis of the tested compound vs LPS.


Legend

Untr=Untreated cells [neg ctrl]


Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)


HKLM=heat killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation control]


LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation control; 50 ng/ml)


Dex=Dexamethasone (10-6)


BLx=Benzo LXA4


LXA4 10-12 M-10-6 M


KG5-22 10-12 M-10-6 M



FIG. 16 illustrates that the imidazole-lipoxin analogue KG5-22 (referred to as IM 6-R-6 in the experimental section below) does not elicit NFkB-driven luciferase activity in resting conditions. 1×105 THP-1 LUCIA monocytes were treated for 30 min with BenzoLXA4 1×10-12 M, the stable imidazole-lipoxin analogue KG-5-22, vehicle or appropriate controls, at increasing doses ranging from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M. After 24 h, supernatants were collected and NFkB-driven luciferase was measured. Data are expressed as % Relative Luminescence Unit relative to LPS alone ±SEM (n=3).


Legend

Untr=Untreated cells [neg ctrl]


Veh=Vehicle ctr (0.1% EtOH)


HKLM=heat killed Listeria monocytogenes (NFkB activation control]


LPS=Lipopolysaccharide (NFkB activation control; 50 ng/ml)


Dex=Dexamethasone (10-6)


BLx=Benzo LXA4


KG5-22 10−12 M-10−6 M



FIG. 17 shows that the imidazole analogues X and Y attenuate acute inflammation in murine zymosan-induced peritonitis


As shown in FIG. 17 zymosan [1 mg per mouse in 200 μl H2O] induced a massive influx of leukocytes detected in lavage 24 h post-zymosan. Pre-treatment of the animals with LXA4 [5 ng/g, 200 μl i.p. 30 minutes prior to zymosan injection and again, 1 hour after zymosan injection] significantly [p=0.0169] attenuated this response. Mean of total cell numbers=4.27×106/ml [basal]; 5.9×107 [vehicle pretreatment and zymosan]; 2.18×107 [LXA4 pretreatment and zymosan]. Pretreament with (R) and (S) epimers of 9 also attenuated cell influx: 2.5×107/ml [pretreatment with (1R)-9 and zymosan; p=0.0368, relative to zymosan alone]; 1.16×107 (1S)-9 [p=0.0048 relative to zymosan alone]. Importantly, (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 were administered at doses of 1.7 ng/g using the same regimen as LXA4. As anticipated the leukocyte influx was predominantly neutrophil [PMN]. PMN numbers were reduced to 35, 44 and 20% maximum response by LXA4, (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 epimers respectively.


Legend

Effect of LXA4 1 and imidazole-lipoxin analogues (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 on murine zymosan-induced peritonitis. Peritonitis was induced in groups of 5 male C57BL6/J mice by injection of zymosan (Sigma) i.p. (1 mg per mouse in 200 μl H2O). Mice were treated with LXA4 1; (5 ng/g); (1R)-9 (1.7 ng/g) or (1S)-9 (1.7 ng/g) (200 μl i.p.) 30 minutes prior to zymosan injection and again, 1 hour after zymosan injection. Treatments with LXA4 1, (1R)-9 and (1S)-9 are designated A, B and C respectively. Peritoneal cells were collected by lavage 24 hours after injection of zymosan. Cells were incubated with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua stain (Molecular probes, Invitrogen) to isolate dead cells. Data shown are total cell counts/ml. Surface marker expression on peritoneal cells was assessed by flow cytometry with data collection on a CyAn (Beckman Coulter). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). Cells were stained with BD Biosciences mAbs; Siglec-F-PE (E50-2440), F4/80-FITC (BM8), eBiosciences mAb; CD11b-PerCP (M1/70) and BioLegend mAbs; CD206-PECy7 (C068C2) and Ly6G-APCCy7 (1A8). Using appropriate isotype-controls, quadrants were drawn and data plotted on logarithmic scale density- or dot-plots to investigate the relative % of PMN, eoisiophils, M1 and M2 macrophgaes. The relative propotion of each cell type was unchanged by treatment with LX or LX analogues.



FIG. 18 shows that the quinoxaline analogue (1R)-CT-4-43 attenuates acute inflammation as measured in a murine model of carrageenan-induce paw swelling


Legend

CT4-43 attenuates carageenan-induced paw swelling—Mice [male C57Bl/6] were administered vehicle [0.01% EtOH] or CT4-4 [45 ng/mouse i.p] 30 mins before intrapaw injection of 1% carageenan. Paw swelling was monitored over time [4-72 h] using an external lever gauge [Kroeplin]. Data are presented as mean+/−SEM, n=3 mice/treatment group.


EXAMPLES—TESTING

The aims of the experiments were to evaluate the anti-inflammatory, pro-resolving and anti-fibrotic properties of stable LXA4 analogues using a series of in vitro models of inflammation, resolution and fibrosis in order to find useful leads for the development of novel therapeutic modalities.


The structure of LXA4 was modified to prevent: (i) reduction of the C9-C14 unit (at C13-C14); and (ii) oxidation of the C15-C20 unit (at C15 and C20).


The LX analogues were obtained by modifying the native compound as follows:

    • a) methyl esterification at C1 or lactonization of the upper chain;
    • b) replacing of the triene core with the heteroaromatic quinoxaline or isoquinoline groups; and
    • c) shortening or extending the length of the lower chain (from 6C of LXA4 □ to 4C or 8C).


In particular, quinoxaline- and isoquinoline-derivatives (as shown in Table A below) were tested for their anti-inflammatory properties.















TABLE A





Name
Aromatic moiety
C1-C8 Unit
C9-C14 unit
C15-C20 unit
OH— in C15
Structure







(1R)-CT4-43
Quinoxaline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“2,3- quinoxaline“ core insertion
6C chain (same length as LXA4)
(R) configuration


embedded image







(1S)-CT4-93
Quinoxaline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“2,3- quinoxaline” core insertion
6C chain (same length as LXA4)
(S) configuration


embedded image







(1R)-CT4-63
Quinoxaline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“2,3- quinoxaline” core insertion
8C chain (2C longer than LXA4)
(R) configuration


embedded image







(1S)-CT4-53
Quinoxaline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“2,3- quinoxaline” core insertion
8C chain (2C longer than LXA4)
(S) configuration


embedded image







(1R)-CT4-68
Quinoxaline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“2,3- quinoxaline” core insertion
4C chain (2C shorter than LXA4)
(R) configuration


embedded image







(1S)-CT4-73
Quinoxaline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“2,3- quinoxaline” core insertion
4C chain (2C shorter than LXA4)
(S) configuration


embedded image







(1R)-DM-163-RB3
Isoquinoline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“1,3- isoquinoline” core insertion
6C chain (same length as LXA4)
(R) configuration


embedded image







(1S)-DM-162
Isoquinoline   embedded image
LXA4 ester derivative (methyl insertion) 8C chain (same length as LXA4)
“1,3- isoquinoline” core insertion
6C chain (same length as LXA4)
(S) configuration


embedded image







(1S)-DM-178-SB4
Isoquinoline   embedded image
LXA4 lactone derivative 8C cyclized chain (same length as LXA4)
“1,4- isoquinoline” core insertion
6C chain (same length as LXA4)
(S) configuration


embedded image







(1S)-DM-178-SA4
Isoquinoline   embedded image
LXA4 lactone derivative 8C cyclized chain (same length as LXA4)
“1,4- isoquinoline” core insertion
6C chain (same length as LXA4)
(S) configuration


embedded image











Compound (1R)-CT4-43 is referred to as (1R)-6 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1S)-CT4-93 is referred to as (1S)-6 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1R)-CT4-63 is referred to as (1R)-7 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1S)-CT4-53 is referred to as (1S)-7 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1R)-CT4-68 is referred to as (1R)-5 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1S)-CT4-73 is referred to as (1S)-5 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1R)-DM-163-RB3 is referred to as (1R)-16 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1S)-DM-162 is referred to as (1S)-16 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1R)-DM-178-SB4 is referred to as (1R)-48 in the experimental section below.


Compound (1S)-DM-178-SA4 is referred to as (1S)-48 in the experimental section below.


Experimental Design


The experiments were based around a model which utilised 1×105/ml THP-1 monocytes stably expressing NFkB luciferase reporter gene (LUCIA).


Anti-Inflammatory Activity


Anti-inflammatory activity was assessed by testing 10 analogues (6 quinoxalines & 4 isoquinolines) in presence & absence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). For each analogue, a dose-response from 10−12 M up to 10−6 M was performed. The vehicle control corresponded to 0.1% Ethanol. NFkB activator, Heat-Killed Listeria Monocytogenes (HKLM) (107 cells/ml), were used as positive control for luciferase induction. 10−6 M Dexamethasone (Dex) was used as positive control for luciferase inhibition. 10−1 M Benzo-lipoxin A4 (BLX) was used as positive control for LXA4 analogues.


Cytotoxicity Prior to functional assay testing, all compounds were screened for any cytotoxic effect, in the presence & absence of LPS, measuring the level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released at A490nm.


Statistical Analysis


A 2-tailed, assuming unequal variance T-test analysis was performed on three independent experiments for each assay. P-values were considered significant when p<0.05. If p<0.05, then * or $; if p<0.01, then ** or $$ or ##; if p<0.001, then *** or $$$ or ###.


Results


The results of the experiments are shown in the appended figures.


In particular, with reference to FIGS. 4, 10 and 11, the dose-response for LXA4 vs quinoxaline-derivatives for LPS-induced NFKB luciferase activity is shown. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates and pre-treated with increasing doses of LXA4, analogues or controls for 30 min, followed by 24 h of co-incubation with 50 ng/ml LPS. LXA4 (denoted by black bars in the figures) maximal inhibition is reached at 100 nM (by 24±1.1% relative to LPS). CT4-43 significantly reduced ($=p<0.05) NFkB activity, compared to the corresponding LXA4 dosage, at 1 and 10 nM (respectively, by 38.2±8.2% and by 34.8±4.2%). CT4-68 significantly reduced ($$=p<0.01) NFkB activity, compared to LXA4, at 1 uM (by 28.9±6.6%). CT4-63 had its maximum inhibition at 1 nM (by 22.8±7.4%), but not significantly different from LXA4. The relative “S” epimers presented similar or slightly less potent response (data not shown). (*=statistical analysis vs LPS; $=statistical analysis vs LXA4)


With reference to FIGS. 7 and 12, the dose-response for LXA4 vs isoquinoline-derivatives for LPS-induced NFkB luciferase activity is shown. In particular, it was shown that DM-163-RB3 significantly reduced ($=p<0.05) NFkB activity, compared to the corresponding LXA4 dosage, at 10 nM and 100 nM (respectively, by 35.4±6.1% and by 37.9±9.7%). DM-178-SB4 significantly reduced ($=p<0.05) NFkB activity, compared to LXA4, at 1 uM (by 26.8±8.7%). Furthermore, in the absence of LPS-challenge all the quinoxalines and isoquinolines tested did not induce NFkB activity, in contrast to HKLM stimulation (data not shown). (*=statistical analysis vs LPS; $=statistical analysis vs LXA4)


With reference to FIGS. 13 and 14, there is shown the cytotoxicity of quinoxaline- and isoquinoline-derivatives in presence and absence of LPS-challenge. The cells were treated as described above and, after 24 h, supernatant was collected and LDH activity assayed. LPS was associated with a 40% induction of LDH activity. This response was found to be significantly attenuated by LXA4 analogues. Similarly, the benzo-lipoxin A4 (Blx) analogue significantly (p<0.001) decreased LPS activity. In contrast, Dexamethasone (Dex) significantly (p<0.001) increased LPS response, due to an additive effect. (* or $=statistical analysis vs LPS)


SUMMARY

The most effective analogue identified in the experiment was the quinoxaline-derivative (1R)-CT4-43, which was found to be significantly more potent than LXA4 in reducing LPS-induced NFkB inflammatory activity. Variation of the lower chain length (longer or shorter) did not appear to lead to enhanced activity of quinoxalines. Among the isoquinolines, (1R)-DM-163-RB3 was found to be the most potent and, overall, 1,3-isoquinolines displayed stronger anti-inflammatory properties than 1,4-derivatives. Cytotoxicity of all the analogues analysed suggests protection from LPS-induced damage.


With reference to FIG. 15, there is shown the dose-response for LXA4 vs the imidazole-derivative KG-5-22 for LPS-induced NFkB luciferase activity. In particular, it was shown that KG-5-22 significantly reduced (respectively, $$=p<0.01 and $$$=p<0.001) NFkB activity, compared to the corresponding LXA4 dosage, at 1 pM and 10 pM (respectively, by 43.7±8.9% and by 41.3±9.0%). Furthermore, with reference to FIG. 16, it is shown that in the absence of LPS-challenge the tested imidazole-derivative did not induce NFkB activity, in contrast to HKLM stimulation (data not shown). (*=statistical analysis vs LPS; $=statistical analysis vs LXA4).


EXAMPLES—COMPOUND PREPARATIONS

Compounds (1R)-1 and (1S)-1 of Formula (VIa)




embedded image


3-Bromoquinoline (0.27 mL, 1.99 mmol), hexanal (0.98 mL, 7.97 mmol) and EtOAc (55 mL) were placed in a 100 mL round bottom flask followed by TMSN3 (0.53 mL, 4.03 mmol). PhI(OCOCF3)2 (1.72 g, 4.0 mmol) was added slowly at room temperature. The reaction was stirred for 2.5 h open to air. Triethylamine (7 mL) was added slowly after this time. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the resulting crude product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:CH2Cl2; 98:2) to give ketone 8 (231 mg, 38%) as an orange oil.


Methyl(5S,6R)-bis(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-8-((E)-2-hexanoylquinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate (7)



embedded image


[η-(C3H5)PdCl]2 (8 mg, 0.022 mmol, 6.6 mol %), P(o-tolyl)3 (15 mg, 0.05 mmol, 15.1 mol %) and NaOAc (78 mg, 0.951 mmol, 2.87 mol %) were added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube followed by dry toluene (0.8 mL). Ketone 8 (101.3 mg, 0.331 mmol) was added in dry toluene (0.4 mL) followed by olefin 5 (166 mg, 0.399 mmol, 121 mol %) (prepared according to a published procedure (19)) in dry toluene (0.4 mL). DMA (0.52 mL) was added to the reaction flask and the reaction mixture was heated to 115° C. for 38 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled and filtered through a Celite plug with CH2Cl2 (100 mL). The product was purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2:pentane; 1:1) to give coupled product 7 (145 mg, 68%) as a yellow oil. Rf=0.26 (pentane:CH2Cl2; 9:1); [α]D20=−5.315 (c=0.715, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73-7.69 (m, 1H), 7.62-7.58 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (dd, J=15.9, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.23-4.20 (m, 1H), 3.75-3.72 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.33-3.21 (m, 2H), 2.34 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.80-1.68 (m, 4H), 1.58-1.54 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.38 (m, 4H), 0.93-0.90 (m, 12H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 0.07 (s, 12H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 204.67, 174.16, 151.78, 146.23, 134.57, 134.10, 129.95, 129.84, 129.76, 128.38, 127.80, 127.68, 109.69, 77.30, 76.50, 51.60, 40.37, 34.47, 33.24, 31.71, 26.17, 26.14, 23.93, 22.70, 20.90, 18.43, 18.36, 14.14, −3.82, −3.86, −4.40, −4.52; IR (neat): vmax=3055, 2987, 2958, 2930, 2858, 2305.9, 1733, 1699, 1552, 1422.3, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C36H59NO5Si2 [M+Na] requires 664.3830, found 664.3827.


Methyl (5S,6R)-bis(tert-butydimethylsilyloxy)-8-((E)-2-((R/S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate (37)



embedded image


(S)-Me-CBS (S)-35 (11 mg, 0.04 mmol, 27 mol %) was placed in a 10 mL Schlenk tube followed by THE (0.2 mL) at −20° C. BH3.SMe2 (0.23 mL, 1 M in THF, 0.23 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min. Ketone 8 (45 mg, 0.15 mmol) was added in THE (0.2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at −20° C. for 48 h, over which time the reaction turned red. The reaction was quenched with NH4Cl sat. sol. (2 mL), extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×5 mL), dried over magnesium sulfate and filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by preparative TLC (pentane:CH2Cl2; 1:1) to give alcohol 37 (2 mg, 4%, 11 ee % (1S)) as a yellow oil. Rf=0.2 (pentane:CH2Cl2; 1:1); [α]D20=−19.02 (c=0.315, CH2Cl2); [As this compound is a 50:50 mixture of epimers the NMR spectra have been analysed considering each epimer as an individual entity, therefore having an integration of 1 for each proton in each molecule.] 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.83-7.81 (m, 2H), 7.68 (ddd, J=8.2, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (ddd, J=8.2, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 6.76-6.71 (m, 2H), 6.37 (dd, J=15.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (dd, J=15.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.08-5.03 (m, 2H), 4.27-4.23 (m, 2H), 3.77-3.70 (m, 2H), 3.67-3.66 (m, 6H), 2.34-2.31 (m, 4H), 1.87-1.75 (m. 4H), 1.62-1.51 (m, 10H), 1.39-1.19 (m, 12H), 0.95-1.94 (m, 18H), 0.89-0.88 (m, 24H), 0.09-0.05 (m, 24H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) (174.04, 174.02), (161.24, 160.21), (145.56, 145.51), (135.31, 135.23), (133.30, 133.09), (129.63, 129.61), (128.55, 128.53), (127.67, 127.67), (127.25, 127.10), (126.70, 126.68), (125.32, 125.30), (124.89, 124.66), (77.27, 77.06), (76.61, 76.49), (70.26, 70.26), (51.65, 51.64), (38.65, 38.43), (34.42, 34.35), (33.15, 33.08), (32.06, 32.03), (26.15, 26.13), (26.11, 26.11), (25.47, 25.46), (22.84, 22.84), (21.09, 20.81), (18.41, 18.40), (18.37, 18.34), (14.22, 14.22), (−3.84, −3.89), (−4.34, −4.37), (−4.41, −4.41), (−4.46, −4.48); IR (neat): vmax=3449 (br.), 3054, 2955, 2931, 2857, 1733, 1463, 1439, 1265, 1106, 1007 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C36H61NO5Si2 [M+H] requires 644.4167, found 644.4169; HPLC: Chiralcel IA, (Heptane: EtOH; 98:2, 1 mL/min): Rt=6.95 min (55.71% area), Rt=9.07 min (44.29% area).


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-2,2-dimethyl-5-vinyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (59)



embedded image


Carboxylic acid 14 (520 mg, 2.02 mmol) (prepared according to a variation of the published procedure (19)) was placed in a 100 mL round bottom flask followed by ZrCl4 (180 mg, 0.77 mmol) and dry MeOH (1 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature for 48 h. The resulting crude mixture was flushed through a plug of silica (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1, 300 mL) and filtered. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give a colourless oil. A stirring bar was added along with CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and para-TsOH (35 mg, 0.202 mmol). 2,2-Dimethoxypropane (0.39 mL, 3.17 mmol) was then added, giving a red reaction solution. The reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen for 18 hours after which NaHCO3 sat. sol. (5 mL) was added followed by H2O (10 mL). This was extracted with CH2Cl2 (4×30 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL), dried over magnesium sulfate and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (pentane:EtOAc; 4:1) to give 59 (277 mg, 60%) as a pale yellow oil. Rf=0.71 (1:1 pentane:EtOAc); [α]D20=+4.6 (c=0.9, CH2Cl2); 1H (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.80 (ddd, J=17.1, 10.3, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.34-5.20 (m, 2H), 4.52-4.47 (m, 1H), 4.17-4.11 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.35 (dt, J=7.6, 4.14 Hz, 2H), 1.88-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.73-1.63 (m, 1H), 1.56-1.38 (m, 5H), 1.36 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.96, 134.40, 118.52, 108.38, 79.89, 78.03, 51.65, 33.96, 30.01, 28.36, 25.78, 21.85; IR (neat): vmax=3055, 2988, 1733, 1606 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C12H20O4 [M+Na] requires 251.1259, found 251.1264.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-2,2-dimethyl-5-((E)-2-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)vinyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (61)



embedded image


Acetonide 59 (50 mg, 0.22 mmol) was placed in a 5 mL vial containing Hoveyda-Grubbs' catalyst (7 mg, 0.011 mmol, 5 mol %) and dry CH2Cl2 (1.1 mL). Boronic ester 56 (0.08 mL, 0.42 mmol, 190 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 40° C. under N2 for 24 h. The reaction was cooled, the solvent removed in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EtOAc; 95:5) to give 61 (28 mg, 35%) as a yellow liquid. Rf=0.7 (pentane:EtOAc; 6:1); [α]D20=−5.1 (c=0.35, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.49 (dd, J=18.0, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (d, J=18.0 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (app. t, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.19-4.15 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.37-2.33 (m, 2H), 1.87-1.61 (m, 4H), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 12H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.94, 148.13, 121.98, 108.64, 83.47, 80.51, 78.14, 51.62, 33.89, 29.98, 29.84, 28.25, 25.78, 24.99, 24.96, 24.87, 24.84, 21.96; 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3) δ 29.42 (br., s); IR (neat): vmax=3055, 2986, 2854, 1732, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C18H31BO6 [M+Na] requires 377.2111, found 377.2128.


Synthesis of (1R)-20 and (1S)-20



embedded image


Ketone 8 (50 mg, 0.16 mmol) was added to a dry 10 mL conical flask under N2 containing RuCl2[(S)-(DM-BINAP)][(S)-DAIPEN] (20 mg, 0.016 mmol, 10 mol %), KOt-Bu (21 mg, 0.17 mmol, 100 mol %). Dry iso-propanol (5 mL) was added followed by a drop of B(OiPr)3. The reaction flask was flushed with H2 (15 bar×3) and the reaction mixture was held at 10 bar H2 pressure for 24 h at room temperature. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (pentane:CH2Cl2; 98:2) giving (1R)-20 (32 mg, 65%, 96.7% ee) as a yellow oil. Using RuCl2[(R)-DM-BINAP][(R)-DAIPEN] gave (1S)-20 (30.3 mg, 61.4%, 95.5% ee) as a yellow oil. Rf=0.21 (Pentane:EtOAc; 9:1); [α]D20=(R)−5.74 (c=0.38, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.36 (s, 1H), 8.06 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76-7.75 (m, 2H), 7.58-7.55 (m, 1H), 5.14-5.11 (m, 1H), 4.69 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 2.03-1.99 (m, 1H), 1.59-1.52 (m, 3H), 1.41-1.28 (m, 4H), 0.89 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.37, 145.27, 139.89, 130.30, 128.87, 128.81, 127.44, 126.77, 115.79, 71.88, 37.46, 31.80, 25.56, 22.77, 14.20; IR (neat): vmax=3583 (br.), 2955, 2924, 2854, 1460, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C15H1879BrNO [M+H] requires 308.0650, found 308.0639; UPC2 Chiralcel IC (CO2:MeOH; 99:1 to 70:30 over 5 min, 3 mL/min): Rt=3.14 min (S), Rt=3.27 min (R).


(1S)-20 was prepared in an identical manner using the enantiomeric catalyst RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)][(R)-DAIPEN], identical in all aspects of physical data to (1R)-20 apart from [α]D20 (S)=+26.6 (c=0.415, CH2Cl2).


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-66)



embedded image


Bromide (1R)-20 (50 mg, 0.162 mmol, 96% ee (R)) was added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing KF (27 mg, 0.465 mmol, 287 mol %), Pd(OAc)2 (1 mg, 0.0045 mmol, 3 mol %), JohnPhos (3 mg, 0.01 mmol, 6 mol %). Boronic ester 61 (84 mg, 0.237 mmol, 150 mol %) was added in THE (0.8 mL) followed by deionised H2O (0.1 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 80° C. for 12 h after which time Et2O (3 mL) was added followed by a NaOH 5% (w/v) solution (2 mL). The organic product was extracted into Et2O (4×3 mL) and the combined organic phases were washed with brine (3 mL) and dried over magnesium sulfate. The product was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1) to give coupled product (1R)-66 (50 mg, 67%) as an orange oil. Rf=0.7 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=−0.32 (c=0.75, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (ddd, J=8.4, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (ddd, J=8.0, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.90-6.84 (m, 1H), 6.26 (dd, J=15.5, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.09-5.04 (m, 1H), 4.81-4.74 (m, 1H), 4.30-4.26 (m, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.41-2.33 (m, 2H), 1.92-1.67 (m, 5H), 1.57 (s, 3H), 1.55-1.48 (m, 4H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.34-1.24 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.79, 160.10, 145.73, 133.75, 130.38, 129.80, 128.54, 127.85, 127.70, 127.67, 127.64, 126.76, 108.77, 79.05, 78.38, 70.22, 51.63, 38.16, 33.79, 31.85, 30.22, 28.39, 25.72, 25.29, 22.72, 21.94, 14.16; IR (neat): vmax=3423 (br.), 3054, 2987, 1641, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C27H37NO5 [M+H] requires 456.2750, found 456.2734.


Methyl(5S,6R)-dihydroxy-8-((E)-2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-1)



embedded image


Protected compound (1R)-66 (45 mg, 0.10 mmol) in dry MeOH (1 mL) was placed in a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing ZrCl4 (73 mg, 0.31 mmol, 310 mol %). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1) to give triol (1R)-1 (14 mg, 36%) as a yellow wax. Rf=0.5 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=−4.63 (c=0.65, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.69-7.66 (m, 1H), 7.52-7.48 (m, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=14.8 Hz, 1H), 6.38 (dd, J=14.0, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 5.10-5.03 (m, 1H), 4.38-4.32 (m, 1H), 3.84 (dt, J=8.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.73-3.61 (m, 4H), 2.39 (td, J=7.2, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 1.92-1.74 (m, 3H), 1.62-1.46 (m, 5H), 1.32-1.27 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.29, 159.95, 145.66, 133.65, 131.92, 129.85, 128.48, 127.68, 127.66, 127.65, 127.47, 126.81, 75.73, 74.00, 70.22, 51.79, 38.14, 33.76, 31.92, 31.72, 25.26, 22.75, 21.21, 14.19; IR (neat): vmax=3432 (br.), 3054, 2954, 2938, 2859, 1734, 1438, 1422, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C24H33NO5 [M+Na] requires 438.2256, found 438.2257.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-66)



embedded image


Bromide (1S)-20 (71 mg, 0.23 mmol, 96% ee (S)) was added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing KF (38 mg, 0.65 mmol, 283 mol %), Pd(OAc)2 (1 mg, 0.0045 mmol, 2 mol %), JohnPhos (4 mg, 0.0134 mmol, 6 mol %). Boronic ester 61 (112 mg, 0.316 mmol, 137 mol %) was added in THE (1.14 mL) followed by deionised H2O (0.14 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 80° C. for 16 h after which time Et2O (4 mL) was added followed by a NaOH 5% (w/v) solution (3 mL). The organic product was extracted in Et2O (4×5 mL) and the combined organic phases were washed with brine (5 mL) and dried over magnesium sulfate. The product was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1) to give coupled product (1S)-66 (43 mg, 41%) as an orange oil. Rf=0.7 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=+2.45 (c=0.645, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (ddd, J=8.3, 7.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (ddd, J=8.3, 7.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (dd, J=15.6, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.10-5.03 (m, 1H), 4.77 (dd, J=7.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 4.31-4.25 (m, 1H), 3.64 (d, J=0.9 Hz, 3H), 2.41-2.34 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.64 (m, 5H), 1.57 (s, 3H), 1.55-1.47 (m, 4H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.35-1.27 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 5H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.84, 160.20, 145.77, 133.58, 130.45, 129.82, 128.58, 127.73, 127.68, 127.66, 127.35, 126.78, 108.75, 79.09, 78.46, 70.30, 51.67, 38.27, 33.82, 31.89, 30.31, 28.35, 25.71, 25.44, 22.78, 21.91, 14.19; IR (neat): vmax=3424 (br.), 3054, 2987, 2954, 2932, 1735, 1438, 1422, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C27H37NO5 [M+H] requires 456.2750, found 456.2761.


Methyl(5S,6R)-dihydroxy-8-((E)-2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-CT4-93)



embedded image


Protected compound (1S)-66 (32 mg, 0.07 mmol) in dry MeOH (1 mL) was placed in a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing ZrCl4 (49 mg, 0.211 mmol, 301 mol %). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:CH2Cl2; 9:1 to 1:9, then CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1) to give triol (1S)-1 (23 mg, 78%) as a yellow wax. Rf=0.5 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=+4.18 (c=0.16, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.73-7.66 (m, 1H), 7.54-7.51 (m, 1H), 6.89 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (dd, J=15.7, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.09-5.06 (m, 1H), 4.38-4.36 (m, 1H), 3.85-3.81 (m, 1H), 3.73-3.61 (m, 4H), 2.45-2.35 (m, 3H), 1.91-1.73 (m, 4H), 1.60-1.58 (m, 5H), 1.32-1.28 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.32, 160.16, 145.78, 133.62, 131.91, 129.85, 128.59, 127.78, 127.74, 127.66, 127.36, 126.82, 75.68, 74.05, 70.30, 51.81, 38.21, 33.77, 31.64, 29.85, 25.35, 22.77, 21.14, 14.20; IR (neat): vmax=3394 (br.), 2977, 2901, 2885, 1659, 1644, 1454, 1412, 1382, 1329, 1274, 1086, 1047 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C24H33NO5 [M+Na] calculated 438.2256, found 438.2262.


Compound 1 of Formula (VIb) and Compound 2 of Formula (VIb2)
1-(2-Chloroquinolin-3-yl)hexan-1-one (5)



embedded image


In a dry 250 mL Schlenk tube, oxalyl chloride (1.6 mL, 18 mmol) was added slowly at room temperature to known carboxylic acid 11 (830 mg, 4.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (35 mL), followed by DMF (0.1 mL, 1.5 mmol, 38 mol %). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 3 h, during which time the reaction mixture went from a suspension to yellow transparent solution. While this reaction was proceeding, Mg turnings (430 mg, 17.7 mmol) were placed in a 50 mL Schlenk tube and heated under vacuum for 10 min. THE (10 mL) and an iodine crystal were added followed by 1-bromopentane (2.35 mL, 19 mmol, 4.75 equiv.). The mixture was heated to reflux for 2.5 h and then brought to room temperature. Bis[2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl]ether (3.35 mL, 17.5 mmol, 4.4 equiv.) was placed in a dry 100 mL round bottom flask containing THE (9 mL) and the solution was brought to 0° C. The Grignard reagent was added slowly in THE (5 mL) to this chelating ether 10 solution. The solution was stirred for 15 min at 0° C., producing a white suspension. The CH2Cl2 and oxalyl chloride were removed in vacuo from the 250 mL Schlenk tube. THE (10 mL) was added and the reaction was brought to −78° C. The Grignard was slowly added to the acid chloride solution and this mixture stirred was at −78° C. for 18 h, giving a yellow solution.


The reaction was quenched in a separating funnel containing NH4Cl sat. sol. (40 mL) and the organic phase was extracted with EtOAc (6×50 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with brine (30 mL), dried over magnesium sulfate and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The product was purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2:pentane; 1:1) to give ketone 5 (890 mg, 85%) as a yellow oil. Rf=0.26 (cyclohexane:EtOAc; 9:1); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.05 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (ddd, J=8.3, 7.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (ddd, J=8.3, 7.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.05 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.77 (p, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.43-1.32 (m, 4H), 0.92 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.16, 148.09, 145.96, 138.41, 133.89, 132.14, 128.62, 128.38, 127.95, 126.34, 43.09, 31.46, 24.12, 22.58, 14.03; IR (neat): vmax=3055, 2987, 2960, 2932, 1703.2, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C15H1635ClNO [M+H] requires 262.0999, found 262.1003.


(E)-Methyl 3-(3-hexanoylquinolin-2-yl)acrylate (15)



embedded image


[η-(C3H5)PdCl]2 (25 mg, 0.069 mmol, 20 mol %), P(o-tolyl)3 (47 mg, 0.155 mmol, 45 mol %),NaOAc (85 mg, 1.032 mmol, 300 mol %) were placed in a dry 15 mL Schlenk tube. Chloride 5 (90 mg, 0.344 mmol) was added in dry toluene (0.5 mL) followed by dry toluene (0.8 mL) and dry DMA (43 mL), followed by methyl acrylate (0.06 mL, 0.67 mmol, 194 mol %). The reaction mixture was heated to 115° C. for 48 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a plug of celite with CH2Cl2 (100 mL). The solvent was removed in vacuo and the product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:CH2Cl2; 94:6 then 100% CH2Cl2) to give 15 (6 mg, 5%) as a red oil. Rf=0.1 (CH2Cl2:pentane; 1:1); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.20 (d, J=15.3 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (ddd, J=8.5, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.65-7.60 (m, 1H), 7.20 (d, J=15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.05 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.80 (p, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.47-1.34 (m, 4H), 0.93 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.98, 167.15, 150.91, 148.53, 141.54, 137.11, 132.41, 132.05, 130.00, 128.38, 128.16, 126.86, 125.12, 52.01, 41.79, 31.57, 24.22, 22.65, 14.09; IR (neat): vmax=3430 (br.), 3055, 2988, 1720, 1688, 1422, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C19H21NO3 [M+H] requires 312.1600, found 312.1596.


1-(2-Vinylquinolin-3-yl)hexan-1-one (23)



embedded image


Chloride 5 (890 mg, 3.4 mmol) was placed in a dry 100 mL Schlenk tube followed by Pd(PPh3)4 (75 mg, 0.065 mmol, 1.9 mol %) and dry 1,4-dimethoxyethane (15 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min after which time a solution of K2CO3 (540 mg, 3.91 mmol, 115 mol %) in deionized H2O (5 mL) was added. O'Shea's reagent (544 mg, 2.26 mmol, 66 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was brought to 96° C. (reflux) for 20 h. The reaction was quenched in a separatory funnel containing H2O (100 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (6×50 mL), filtered through a plug of magnesium sulfate and dried in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2:pentane; 1:1) giving vinylated compound 23 (710 mg, 82%) as a brown oil. Rf=0.2 (pentane:CH2Cl2; 1:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.32 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (ddd, J=8.4, 7.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.57-7.52 (m, 1H), 7.30 (dd, J=17.0, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (dd, J=17.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.63 (dd, J=10.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.76 (p, J=7.4 Hz, 3H), 1.40-1.33 (m, 4H), 0.91 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 204.22, 153.15, 148.46, 136.57, 134.67, 132.21, 131.50, 129.60, 128.24, 127.15, 126.27, 122.06, 42.31, 31.52, 24.28, 22.61, 14.05; IR (neat): vmax=3055, 2988, 1707, 1423, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C17H19NO [M+H] requires 254.1545, found 254.1535.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-hexanoylquinolin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (34)



embedded image


Chloride 5 (220 mg, 0.85 mmol) was placed in a 50 mL Schlenk tube containing Pd(PPh3)4 (23 mg, 0.02 mmol, 2.5 mol %) and DME (4.5 mL) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. K2CO3 (153 mg, 1.11 mmol, 130 mol %), Boronic ester 61 (330 mg, 0.93 mmol, 110 mol %), DME (2.6 mL) were added followed by deionized H2O (1.5 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 93° C. for 14 h after which time CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added along with NaHCO3 sat. sol. (15 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (4×20 mL) and the combined organic phases were washed with brine (30 mL) and dried over magnesium sulfate. The product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:CH2Cl2; 4:1 to 1:1, then pentane:EtOAc; 6:1) to give coupled product 34 (190 mg, 49%) as a yellow liquid. Rf=0.3 (pentane:EtOAc; 6:1); [α]D20=−9.27 (c=0.15, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 8.07 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (ddd, J=8.4, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.58-7.51 (m, 1H), 7.22 (d, J=15.2 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J=15.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.82-4.79 (m, 1H), 4.29-4.25 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.99 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.36 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 1.79-1.70 (m, 4H), 1.66-1.59 (m, 2H), 1.58 (s, 3H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.39-1.36 (m, 4H), 0.92 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.70, 178.55, 152.06, 148.52, 136.51, 134.02, 132.28, 131.48, 130.03, 129.64, 128.23, 127.10, 126.17, 108.77, 79.06, 78.62, 51.62, 42.42, 33.96, 31.58, 30.24, 28.41, 25.90, 24.29, 22.65, 22.04, 14.09; IR (neat): vmax=3054, 2986, 2959, 2932, 2863, 1732, 1688, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C27H35NO5 [M+H] requires 454.2593, found 454.2606.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-41)



embedded image


Ketone 34 (23 mg, 0.05 mmol) was added to a dry 10 mL conical flask containing RuCl2[(S)-(DM-BINAP)][(S)-DAIPEN] (7 mg, 0.0057 mmol, 11 mol %), KOt-Bu (7 mg, 0.06 mmol, 125 mol %) and 2-propanol (4 mL). A few drops of B(Oi-Pr)3 were added and the reaction vessel was flushed with H2 (3×15 bar) and stirred at room temperature for 15 h under 15 bar pressure of H2. The crude mixture was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1) to give alcohol (1R)-41 (13 mg, 54%, 70% de) as an orange oil. Rf=0.2 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=+2.57 (c=0.56, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.67-7.62 (m, 1H), 7.48-7.44 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, J=15.1 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J=15.1, 6.4 Hz, 2H), 5.14-5.12 (m, 1H), 4.84-4.82 (m, 1H), 4.30-4.26 (m, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.36-2.32 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.75 (m, 4H), 1.75-1.49 (m, 5H), 1.47-1.19 (m, 11H), 0.88 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.06, 152.40, 147.24, 136.09, 133.54, 133.19, 129.41, 129.26, 128.36, 127.64, 127.60, 126.34, 108.69, 78.91, 78.51, 70.75, 51.64, 38.66, 33.95, 31.77, 30.34, 28.42, 25.84, 25.81, 22.76, 21.95, 14.17; IR (neat): vmax=3434 (br.), 3054, 2987, 1648, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C27H37NO5 [M+H] requires 456.2750, found 456.2747; Chiralcel IC (CO2: IPA; 99:1 to 70:30 over 5 min, 3 mL/min): Rt (minor)=5.09 min, 15.2% area (1S), Rt (major)=5.59 min, 84.8% area (1R).


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-41)



embedded image


Ketone 34 (28 mg, 0.062 mmol) was added to a dry 10 mL conical flask containing RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)][(R)-DAIPEN] (8 mg, 0.0066 mmol, 11 mol %), KOt-Bu (8 mg, 0.065 mmol, 106 mol %) and 2-propanol (4 mL). A few drops of B(Oi-Pr)3 were added and the reaction vessel was flushed with H2 (3×15 bar) and stirred at room temperature for 15 h under 15 bar pressure of H2. The crude mixture was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:pentane; 1:1 then CH2Cl2:MeOH; 98:2) to give alcohol (1S)-41 (8 mg, 30%, 89% de) as an orange oil. Rf=0.2 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=−1.7 (c=0.27, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.66-7.63 (m, 1H), 7.47-7.44 (m, 1H), 5.16 (dd, J=7.7, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 4.86-4.83 (m, 1H), 4.29 (dt, J=9.9, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.38-2.30 (m, 2H), 1.88-1.67 (m, 4H), 1.64-1.49 (m, 5H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.41-1.28 (m, 6H), 0.88 (t, J=6.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.04, 152.23, 147.22, 136.15, 133.60, 132.93, 129.41, 129.25, 127.91, 127.67, 127.62, 126.33, 108.68, 78.84, 78.49, 70.25, 51.64, 38.78, 33.93, 31.83, 30.36, 28.38, 25.85, 25.83, 22.77, 21.94, 14.17; IR (neat): vmax=3455 (br.), 3054, 2987, 1642, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C27H37NO5 [M+H] requires 456.2750, found 456.2735; Chiralcel IC (CO2: IPA; 99:1 to 70:30 over 5 min, 3 mL/min): Rt (mayor)=5.09 min, 91.4% area (1S), Rt (minor)=5.59 min, 8.6% area (1R).


Iso-propyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-42)



embedded image


Ketone 34 (105 mg, 0.23 mmol) was placed in a 10 mL conical flask containing RuCl2[(S)-(DM-BINAP)][(S)-DAIPEN] (33 mg, 0.027 mmol, 12 mol %) and KOt-Bu (33 mg, 0.27 mmol, 118 mol %) in n-propanol (5 mL). A few drops of B(Oi-Pr)3 were added and the reaction vessel was flushed with H2 (3×15 bar) and stirred at room temperature for 22 h under 10 bar pressure of H2. The product was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:pentane 1:1 then CH2Cl2:MeOH; 96:4) to give alcohol (1R)-42 (47 mg, 42%) as an orange oil. Rf=0.3 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=+12.47 (c=0.83, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.66-7.63 (m, 1H), 7.48-7.44 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, J=15.1 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J=15.1, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (dd, J=7.5, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (sep, J=6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (t, J=6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.32-4.25 (m, 1H), 2.31-2.27 (m, 2H), 1.89-1.66 (m, 4H), 1.65-1.47 (m, 5H), 1.46-1.27 (m, 9H), 1.20 (dd, J=6.2, 4.8 Hz, 2H), 1.15 (dd, J=6.2, 4.8 Hz, 4H), 0.91-0.87 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.18, 152.38, 147.24, 136.10, 133.54, 133.17, 129.37, 129.29, 128.32, 127.70, 127.63, 127.58, 126.31, 108.67, 78.91, 78.54, 70.78, 67.68, 38.67, 34.59, 31.77, 30.36, 28.44, 25.85, 25.82, 22.76, 22.04, 21.93, 14.17; IR (neat): vmax=3400 (br.), 2980, 2932, 2858, 1730, 1458, 1215 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C29H41NO5 [M+Na] requires 506.2882, found 506.2893. Separation of the diastereoisomers by HPLC (including SFC) proved difficult, therefore de has not been calculated.


Iso-propyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-42)



embedded image


Ketone 34 (25 mg, 0.055 mmol) was placed in a 10 mL conical flask containing RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)][(R)-DAIPEN] (8 mg, 0.0066 mmol, 12 mol %) and KOt-Bu (8 mg, 0.065 mmol, 118 mol %) in n-propanol (5 mL). A few drops of B(Oi-Pr)3 were added and the reaction vessel was flushed with H2 (3×15 bar) and stirred at room temperature for 22 h under 10 bar pressure of H2. The product was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 96:4) to give alcohol (1S)-42 (15 mg, 56%) as an orange oil. Rf=0.3 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); [α]D20=−17.99 (c=0.59, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (ddd, J=8.4, 6.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (ddd, J=8.0, 6.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J=15.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (dd, J=8.2, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (sep, J=6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.85-4.83 (m, 1H), 4.30-4.27 (m, 1H), 2.34-2.26 (m, 2H), 1.86-1.68 (m, 4H), 1.64-1.50 (m, 5H), 1.50-1.22 (m, 9H), 1.16 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.13 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.16, 152.22, 147.25, 136.17, 133.63, 132.90, 129.36, 129.29, 127.89, 127.67, 127.60, 126.29, 108.66, 78.86, 78.53, 70.22, 67.68, 38.79, 34.57, 31.84, 30.37, 28.40, 25.86, 25.84, 22.78, 22.04, 21.93, 21.91, 14.17; IR (neat): vmax=3412 (br.), 2980, 2933, 2858, 1729, 1458, 1213 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C29H41NO5 [M+Na] requires 506.2882, found 506.2875. Separation of the diastereoisomers by HPLC (including SFC) proved difficult, therefore de has not been calculated.


Methyl(5S,6R)-dihydroxy-8-((E)-3-((S/R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate (1)



embedded image


Protected compound 42 (47 mg, 0.103 mmol) was added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing ZrCl4 (72 mg, 0.31 mmol, 301 mol %) in MeOH (1.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 h. The product was purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2:pentane; 1:1 to 9:1 then CH2Cl2:MeOH; 95:5) to give triol 1 (24 mg, 56%) as an off white waxy oil. Rf=0.2 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 95:5); 1H NMR (500 MHz, (CD3)2CO) δ 8.99 (s, 1H), 8.67 (s, 1H), 8.14 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.93-7.80 (m, 2H), 7.74-7.71 (m, 1H), 7.65-7.58 (m, 1H), 7.17-7.05 (m, 1H), 5.10 (dd, J=8.7, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.08-4.02 (m, 1H), 3.51-3.49 (m, 1H), 3.45 (s, 3H), 2.28-2.23 (m, 2H), 1.82-1.57 (m, 5H), 1.46-1.18 (m, 8H), 0.80-0.71 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, (CD3)2CO) δ 174.07, 159.34, 143.55, 141.63, 138.19, 134.58, 134.44, 130.04, 129.55, 128.60, 121.32, 121.31, 78.38, 75.04, 68.65, 51.73, 39.68, 34.28, 32.51, 26.67, 23.47, 23.37, 22.87, 14.51. IR (neat): vmax=3352 (br.), 2983, 2944, 2834, 2596, 2519, 2361, 2340, 2221, 2045, 1656, 1449, 1421, 1115, 1024 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C24H33NO5 [M+H] requires 416.2437, found 416.2458. Separation of the diastereoisomers by HPLC (including SFC) proved difficult, therefore de has not been calculated.


Methyl(5S,6R)-dihydroxy-8-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-2-yl)octanoate (43)



embedded image


Rf=0.2 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CH3)2CO) δ 8.38-8.36 ((m, 1H), 8.01-7.88 (m, 2H), 7.73-7.66 (m, 1H), 7.57-7.49 (m, 1H), 5.23-5.15 (m, 1H), 4.46 (dd, J=14.1, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.79-3.78 (m, 1H), 3.64-3.56 (m, 4H), 2.38-2.33 (m, 2H), 1.96-1.46 (m, 10H), 1.36-1.28 (m, 8H), 0.92-0.87 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, (CH3)2CO) δ 172.80, 160.90, 147.83, 133.51, 129.72, 129.69, 128.90, 128.51, 128.44, 126.65, 76.33, 74.95, 70.19, 51.45, 39.61, 39.51, 34.45, 32.69, 32.48, 26.60, 26.37, 23.34, 22.33, 14.35; IR (neat): vmax=3495 (br.), 3174, 3107, 3055, 2956, 2956, 2849, 2107, 1646, 1453, 1382, 1015 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C24H35NO5 [M+H] requires 418.2593, found 418.2578.


1-(3-Bromoquinolin-4-yl)hexan-1-ol (53)



embedded image


n-BuLi (3.3 mL, 1.6 M in hexanes, 5.28 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) was added to diisopropylamine (0.81 mL, 5.8 mmol, 1.21 equiv.) in THE (10 mL) in a 250 mL Schlenk at −78° C. The mixture was stirred for 15 min after which time 3-bromoquinoline (0.65 mL, 4.79 mmol) in THE (7 mL) was added over 10 min. The reaction mixture was then brought to −100° C. for 20 min. Hexanal (1.56 mL, 12.7 mmol) was added over 10 min at −100° C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at −100° C. The reaction was quenched with NH4Cl sat. sol. (70 mL) and the aqueous phase was extracted in CH2Cl2 (4×100 mL). The combined organic phase was then washed with brine (100 mL) and dried over NaSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and purified by column chromatography (cyclohexane:EtOAc; 95:5) to give alcohol 53 (446 mg, 30%) as a white waxy oil that solidified on standing. M.p.=53-55° C.; Rf=0.8 (EtOAc:pentane; 3:1); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.86 (s, 1H), 8.75 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.08-8.06 (m, 1H), 7.70 (ddd, J=8.5, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (ddd, J=8.5, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (ddd, J=8.6, 5.2, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (br. s, 1H), 2.24-2.12 (m, 1H), 1.94-1.88 (m, 1H), 1.73-1.62 (m, 1H), 1.39-1.28 (m, 5H), 0.89 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.09, 147.93, 146.70, 130.22, 129.32, 127.36, 126.74, 109.99, 75.69, 36.61, 31.53, 25.84, 22.53, 14.00. IR (neat): vmax=3583 (br.), 3055, 2987, 2959, 2306, 1502, 1422, 1379, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C15H1879BrNO [M+H] requires 308.0650, found: 308.0652.


1-(3-Bromoquinolin-4-yl)hexan-1-one (45)



embedded image


n-BuLi (0.93 mL, 1.48 M in hexanes, 1.38 mmol, 1.03 equiv) was added to diisopropylamine (0.19 mL, 1.35 mmol, 1.02 equiv.) in THE (3.2 mL) at −78° C. and stirred for 15 min. 3-Bromoquinoline (0.17 mL, 1.33 mmol) in THE (0.2 mL) was added over 10 min. The reaction mixture was then brought to −88° C. for 20 min and then −100° C. for 10 min. Hexanal (0.30 mL, 2.50 mmol, 1.88 equiv.) in THE (0.6 mL) was added over 10 min at −100° C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at this temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated NH4Cl sat. sol. (0.6 mL), extracted in ether (3×50 mL) and dried over NaSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and purified by column chromatography (pentane:EtOAc; 4:1) to give approximately 25% yield of a yellow oil. PCC (50 mg, 0.23 mmol) was added to CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) at 0° C., followed by the crude alcohol 53 in CH2Cl2 (0.4 mL) and then acetic acid (0.02 mL, 0.35 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 71 h with the temperature increasing to room temperature. Et2O (3.2 mL) was added, the reaction was filtered twice through filter paper and cotton wool. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc:pentane; 4:1) to give 45 (16 mg, 9% over two steps) as a yellow oil product. Rf=0.7 (pentane:EtOAc; 4:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.94 (s, 1H), 8.13 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (ddd, J=8.4, 6.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.65-7.53 (m, 2H), 2.95 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.84 (tt, J=7.34, 7.23 Hz, 2H), 1.49-1.31 (m, 4H), 0.93 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 204.58, 151.82, 147.25, 146.70, 130.29, 128.61, 128.59, 124.11, 111.95, 44.10, 31.37, 22.88, 22.62, 14.05; IR (neat): vmax=2932, 2869, 1711, 1456 cm−1; HRMS (E+) C15H1679BrNO [M] requires 305.0415, found 305.0416.


3-Bromoquinoline-4-carboxylic acid (54)



embedded image


n-BuLi (1.6 M in hexanes, 3.3 mL, 5.28 mmol, 1.1 equiv) was added slowly to a 250 mL Schlenk tube containing dry THE (10 mL) and diisopropylamine (0.81 mL, 5.8 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) at −78° C. The mixture was stirred at −78° C. for 10 min after which time 3-bromoquinoline (0.65 mL, 4.8 mmol) in dry THE (7 mL) was added over 20 min. The reaction mixture was brought to −100° C. over 15 min and held at this temperature for 20 min. CO2 (s) was added as a powder to the open reaction flask under a constant stream of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was allowed to come to room temperature overnight. NaHCO3 sat. sol. (30 mL) was added to the reaction along with CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and the aqueous phase was brought to pH 10 by addition of NaHCO3 sat. sol. (approx. 100 mL). The organic phase was extracted in CH2Cl2 (3×50 mL) and discarded and the aqueous phase was brought to pH 1 by careful addition of HCl (1 M solution, approx. 200 mL). The organic phase was extracted from this acidic aqueous phase by a 3:1 mixture of chloroform:ethanol (5×75 mL). The combined organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give acid 54 (562 mg 47%) as an off-white solid. M.p.=245-247° C.; 1H NMR (500 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ 9.06 (s, 1H), 8.12 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (ddd, J=8.4, 6.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84-7.81 (m, 1H), 7.76 (ddd, J=8.4, 6.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ 166.53, 151.63, 145.80, 141.40, 130.61, 129.46, 128.92, 124.60, 124.06, 112.58; IR (neat): vmax=3402 (br.), 2954, 2930, 2858, 1670, 1502, 1264, 1159 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C10H7NO279Br [M+H] requires 251.9660, found 251.9656.


3-Bromo-N-methoxy-N-methylquinoline-4-carboxamide (60)



embedded image


Carboxylic acid 54 (30 mg, 0.12 mmol) was added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing HN(OMe)Me.HCl (85 mg, 0.87 mmol, 7.25 equiv.) in dry CH2Cl2 (1 mL). The mixture was stirred for 10 min after which time 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethyl-carbodiimide (80 mg, 0.417 mmol, 3.5 equiv.) and HN(OMe)Me.HCl (50 mg, 0.51 mmol, 4.25 equiv.) were added, followed by a few drops of diisopropylethylamine. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h after which time the reaction was diluted with CH2Cl2 (3 mL). NH4Cl sat. sol. was added and the organic phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (4×5 mL), The resulting organic phase was then washed with NaHCO3 sat. sol. (25 mL), and brine (25 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The resulting crude mixture was filtered through silica plug with Et2O to give 60 (25 mg, 70%) as a pale yellow oil. Rf=0.5 (100% Et2O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.97 (s, 1H), 8.13 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (ddd, J=8.4, 7.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (ddd, J=8.4, 7.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (s, 2H), 3.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) 166.70, 151.65, 146.76, 142.62, 130.18, 130.06, 128.43, 124.73, 122.81, 113.96, 61.98, 32.52; IR (neat): vmax=3054, 2987, 1662, 1423, 1266, 1099 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C12H12N2O279Br [M+H] requires 295.0082, found 295.0083.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-(1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (63)



embedded image


Aryl bromide 53 (49 mg, 0.16 mmol) was placed in a 10 mL Schlenk tube containing KF (28 mg, 0.482 mmol, 300 mol %), Pd(OAc)2 (1 mg, 0.0045 mmol, 2.8 mol %) and JohnPhos (3 mg, 0.01 mmol, 6.3 mol %). Boronic ester 61 (82 mg, 0.23 mmol, 145 mol %) was added in dry THE (0.8 mL) followed by deionized H2O (0.1 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 80° C. for 16 h during which time the reaction mixture went darker. Et2O (3 mL) was added followed by a NaOH 5% (v/v) solution (2 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted in Et2O (4×3 mL) and the organic phase was washed with brine (3 mL) and dried over magnesium sulfate. The crude mixture was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 9:1) followed by an additional preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 98:2) to give the coupled product 63 (28 mg, 39%) of as an off-white wax. Rf=0.5 (CH2Cl2:pentane; 9:1); [α]D20=−2.07 (c=0.32, CH2Cl2); [As this compound is a 50:50 mixture of epimers the NMR spectra have been analysed considering each epimer as an individual entity, therefore having an integration of 1 for each proton in each molecule.] 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) 8.88 (s, 1H), 8.87 (s, 1H), 8.56 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.68-7.62 (m, 2H), 7.56-7.50 (m, 2H), 7.29 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.12-6.04 (m, 2H), 5.64-5.52 (m, 2H), 4.79-4.73 (m, 2H), 4.29-4.23 (m, 2H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.41-2.28 (m, 4H), 2.20-2.13 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.84 (m, 2H), 1.82-1.61 (m, 8H), 1.56 (s, 6H), 1.42 (s, 6H), 1.34-1.27 (m, 12H), 0.90-0.84 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (174.25, 174.16), (150.26, 150.04), (145.26, 145.13), (140.34, 140.34), (130.33, 130.30), (128.95, 128.95), (128.92, 128.92), (127.67, 127.61), (126.66, 126.66), (126.55, 126.55), (126.34, 126.34), (125.88, 125.66), (108.75, 108.75), (79.43, 79.39), (78.38, 78.35), (71.14, 70.99), (51.78, 51.78), (37.43, 37.39), (33.99, 33.96), (31.82, 31.80), (28.39, 28.39), (26.27, 26.27), (25.76, 25.76), (22.73, 22.73), (22.72, 21.79), (21.69, 21.69), (14.16, 14.16); IR (neat): vmax=3428 (br.), 3331, 3054, 2986, 2957, 2930, 1730, 1641, 1438, 1264 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C27H37NO5 [M+H] requires 456.2750, found 456.2757; HPLC: Chiralcel IB, (Heptane:EtOH 90:10, 1 mL/min): Rt=8.7 min, Rt=11.7 min.


Methyl (5S,6R)-dihydroxy-8-((E)-4-(1-hydroxyhexyl)quinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate (2)



embedded image


Compound 63 (28 mg, 0.0615 mmol) was added in dry MeOH (1 mL) to a 5 mL vial containing ZrCl4 (43 mg, 0.18 mmol, 292 mol %). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 95:5) to give 2 (10 mg, 37%) as a white wax. Rf=0.2 (CH2Cl2:MeOH; 95:5); [α]D20=−20.31 (c=0.65, CH2Cl2); [As this compound is a 50:50 mixture of epimers the NMR spectra have been analysed considering each epimer as an individual entity, therefore having an integration of 1 for each proton in each molecule.] H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.51-8.37 (m, 3H), 7.96 (app. t, J=8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.60-7.56 (m, 2H), 7.51-7.42 (m, 2H), 7.16 (d, J=16 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J=16 Hz, 1H), 6.09-6.00 (m, 2H), 5.52-5.45 (m, 1H), 5.45-5.42 (m, 1H), 4.23-4.18 (m, 2H), 3.78-3.72 (m, 2H), 3.63 (s, 6H), 2.31 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.13-2.03 (m, 2H), 1.86-1.75 (m, 4H), 1.73-1.60 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.39 (m, 4H), 1.28-1.20 (m, 12H), 0.84-0.81 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (174.47, 174.43), (152.42, 152.42), (149.71, 149.58), (147.52, 147.43), (146.03, 146.03), (132.52, 132.52), (129.49, 129.47), (129.09, 129.06), (127.95, 127.79), (126.74, 126.74), (126.64, 126.64), (125.75, 125.70), (75.88, 75.78), (74.17, 74.14), (70.53, 70.53), (51.78, 51.78), (37.24, 37.17), (33.85, 33.81), (31.97, 31.97), (31.79, 31.79), (29.85, 29.85) (22.68, 22.68), (21.26, 21.21), (14.14, 14.14); IR (neat): va=3408 (br.), 2954, 2932, 2857, 1729, 1438, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ES+) C24H33NO5 [M+H] requires 416.2437, found 416.2424.


Compounds (1R)-6, (1S)-6, (1R)-7, (1S)-7, (1R)-5 and (1S)-5 of formulas (VIc) (VId) and (VIe)
1-(3-Chloro-quinoxalin-2-yl)-hexan-1-one (9)



embedded image


2-Chloroquinoxaline 11 (500 mg, 3.04 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in EtOAc (23 mL). Hexanal (1.5 mL, 12.15 mmol, 4 eq) and TMSN3 (0.8 mL, 6.08 mmol, 2 eq) were added. PhI(OCOCF3)2 (2.61 g, 6.08 mmol, 2 eq) was added portionwise over 10 min and the mixture turned orange in colour. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Additional TMSN3 (0.8 mL, 6.08 mmol, 2 eq) and PhI(OCOCF3)2 (2.61 g, 6.08 mmol, 2 eq) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred for a further 16 h. Triethylamine (7 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture was stirred for 15 min, filtered through Celite and washed with 10% CuSO4 solution (3×50 mL), water (25 mL) and brine (25 mL). The organic layer was dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (50:1→20:1 pentane:EtOAc) to afford product 9 as a yellow solid (572 mg, 72%). Rf=0.4 (20:1 pentane:EtOAc); m.p.=45-48° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.12 (dd, J=8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (dd, J=8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (m, 2H), 3.18 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.82-1.72 (m, 2H), 1.44-1.31 (m, 4H), 0.91 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 200.7, 148.2, 143.7, 142.3, 139.5, 132.6, 130.8, 129.54, 128.3, 40.4, 31.3, 23.2, 22.4, 13.9; IR (neat) (vmax, cm−1) 3435, 1710, 1265; HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 263.0951 for C14H16O35Cl, found 263.0941.


1-(3-Chloroquinoxalin-2-yl)hexan-1-ol (34)



embedded image


Ketone 9 (97 mg, 0.369 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in dry MeOH (2 mL) and cooled to 0° C. NaBH4 (40 mg, 1.057 mmol, 2.9 eq) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and then was quenched by the addition of acetone (5 mL). The solvent was removed in vacuo and the mixture re-suspended in a saturated aq. NH4Cl solution (25 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×20 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (20 mL), brine (20 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1 pentane:EtOAc) to afford the product 34 as a pale yellow solid (57 mg, 58%). Rf=0.50 (pentane:EtOAc 6:1); m.p.=73-79° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.12-8.06 (m, 1H), 8.06-8.00 (m, 1H), 7.88-7.72 (m, 2H), 5.17 (m, 1H), 4.05 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.06-1.98 (m, 1H), 1.65-1.54 (m, 3H), 1.41-1.25 (m, 4H), 0.88 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.0, 145.4, 141.8, 139.9, 130.9, 130.7, 128.6, 128.4, 70.6, 37.2, 31.7, 25.4, 22.7, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3476, 2958, 1466, 1048; HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 265.1108 for C14H1835ClN2O, found 265.1106.


(S)-1-(3-Chloroquinoxalin-2-yl)hexan-1-ol ((1S)-34)



embedded image


Quinoxaline ketone 9 (50 mg, 0.190 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (2.5 mL). RuCl2[(R)-xylBinap][(R)-DAIPEN] (12 mg, 0.0095 mmol, 0.05 mmol), tBuOK (6 mg, 0.0535 mmol, 0.28 eq) and triisopropyl borate (0.01 mL) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred under 10 Bar of H2 for 24 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1 pentane:EtOAc) and product (1S)-34 was isolated as a pale yellow solid (27 mg, 54%). M.p.=78-81° C.; [α]D=−7.22 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); ee=97% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.00 min (S)-enantiomer, 3.41 min (R)-enantiomer. Identical in all other physical data to the previously prepared racemic 34.


(R)-1-(3-Chloroquinoxalin-2-yl)hexan-1-ol ((1R)-34)



embedded image


Quinoxaline ketone 9 (100 mg, 0.381 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (3 mL). RuCl2[(S)-xylbinap][(S)-DAIPEN] (23 mg, 0.019 mmol, 0.05 mmol), tBuOK (11 mg, 0.095 mmol, 0.25 eq) and triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred under 10 Bar of H2 for 18 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1 pentane:EtOAc) and product (1R)-34 was isolated as a pale yellow solid (40 mg, 40%). M.p.=78-81° C.; [α]D=+13.49 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); ee=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.00 min (S)-enantiomer, 3.41 min (R)-enantiomer. Identical in all other physical data to the previously prepared racemic 34.


(S)-1-(3-Chloroquinoxalin-2-yl)hexyl (R)-3,3,3-trifluoro-2-methoxy-2-phenylpropanoate ((S,R)-49)



embedded image


Quinoxaline alcohol (1S)-34 (35 mg, 0.432 mmol, 1 eq) and (R)-(+)-MTPA 48 (96 mg, 0.410 mmol, 3.1 eq) were dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (2 mL). N,N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (85 mg, 0.410 mmol, 3.1 eq) and DMAP (46 mg, 0.410 mmol, 3.1 eq) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (2 mL), extracted with Et2O (3×5 mL), and the extracts dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (9:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product (S,R)-49 was isolated as a yellow oil (48 mg, 76%). Rf=0.46 (20:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06-8.00 (m, 1H), 7.91-7.86 (m, 1H), 7.83-7.72 (m, 2H), 7.50 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.44-7.38 (m, 1H), 7.37-7.30 (m, 2H), 6.32 (dd, J=8.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 3H), 2.11 (tdd, J=8.5, 6.0, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 1.63-1.52 (m, 2H), 1.41-1.30 (m, 4H), 0.89 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.3, 151.4, 145.2, 141.5, 140.5, 131.8, 131.1, 130.4, 129.5, 129.0, 128.2, 128.2, 127.7, 123.2 (q, J=289.0 Hz), 84.7 (q, J=28.0 Hz), 75.3, 55.7 (q, J=1.0 Hz), 32.8, 31.1, 25.2, 22.4, 13.9; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −71.74; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2955, 1748, 1269, 1186, 1170; [α]D=−32.62 (c=1.0 in CHCl3); [M+Na] calc 503.1325 for C24H24N2O3F335ClNa, found 503.1349.


(S)-1-(3-Chloroquinoxalin-2-yl)hexyl (S)-3,3,3-trifluoro-2-methoxy-2-phenylpropanoate (S,S)-(49)



embedded image


Quinoxaline alcohol (1S)-34 (20 mg, 0.076 mmol, 1 eq) and (S)-(+)-MTPA 48 (57 mg, 0.236 mmol, 3.1 eq) were dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (2 mL). N,N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (49 mg, 0.236 mmol, 3.1 eq) and DMAP (26 mg, 0.236 mmol, 3.1 eq) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (1.5 mL), extracted with Et2O (3×5 mL), and the extracts dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (20:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product (S,S)-49 was isolated as a yellow oil (18 mg, 50%). Rf=0.46 (20:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07-8.00 (m, 2H), 7.84-7.78 (m, 2H), 7.75 (dd, J=6.5, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 7.47-7.39 (m, 3H), 6.33-6.27 (m, 1H), 3.67 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 3H), 2.04 (dd, J=14.0, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.47-1.20 (m, 6H), 0.85 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.3, 151.7, 145.0, 141.5, 140.5, 132.3, 131.1, 130.5, 129.6, 128.7, 128.4, 128.3, 127.6, 123.3 (q, J=288.8 Hz), 84.5 (q, J=27.5 Hz), 75.4, 55.7 (q, J=1.5 Hz), 33.1, 31.0, 24.9, 22.3, 13.8; 19F NMR (376 MHz, cdcl3) 6-71.63; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2955, 1748, 1269, 1186, 1170; [α]D=−10.65 (c=0.9 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 503.1325 for C24H24N2O3F335ClNa, found 503.1349.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-28)



embedded image


Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (10 mg, 0.0261 mmol, 0.17 eq) and dppb (18 mg, 0.0422 mmol, 0.28 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Quinoxaline alcohol (1R)-34 (40 mg, 0.151 mmol, 1 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), and boronic ester 61 (62 mg, 0.180 mmol, 1.2 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.05 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.17 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.177 mmol, 1.2 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 18 h after which time it was diluted with H2O (20 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL), and the extracts washed with brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude reaction mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→2:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give product (1R)-28 as a pale yellow oil (33 mg, 48%) Rf=0.2 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.11-7.94 (m, 2H), 7.70 (m, 2H), 7.14 (dd, J=15.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 5.16-5.10 (m, 1H), 4.84 (dd, J=11.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (dt, J=8.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.43-2.23 (m, 2H), 1.94-1.80 (m, 2H), 1.76-1.63 (m, 2H), 1.57 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.34-1.21 (m, 8H), 0.85 (t, J=7 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.7, 155.1, 146.9, 141.8, 139.8, 135.9, 129.7, 129.7, 129.1, 128.2, 125.3, 108.7, 78.3, 78.3, 69.8, 51.5, 38.1, 33.7, 31.5, 30.1, 28.2, 25.6, 25.2, 22.6, 21.8, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3054, 1733, 1422, 1266; [α]D=+2.21 (c=0.8 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 457.2702 for C26H37N2O5, found 457.2706.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-28)



embedded image


Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (10 mg, 0.0261 mmol, 0.17 eq) and dppb (18 mg, 0.0422 mmol, 0.28 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Quinoxaline alcohol (1S)-34 (39 mg, 0.147 mmol, 1 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), and boronic ester 61 (70 mg, 0.198 mmol, 1.3 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.05 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.17 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.177 mmol, 1.2 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 14 h after which time it was diluted with H2O (20 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL), and the extracts washed with brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated to give a crude mixture which was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→2:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give product (1S)-28 as a pale yellow oil (27 mg, 40%). Rf=0.2 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04-7.92 (m, 2H), 7.70-7.61 (m, 2H), 7.10 (dd, J=15.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (m, 1H), 4.80 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (dd, J=13.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (s, 3H), 2.33-2.24 (m, 2H), 1.85-1.78 (m, 2H), 1.70-1.63 (m, 1H), 1.53 (s, 3H), 1.51-1.47 (m, 4H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.33-1.20 (m, 5H), 0.81 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.3, 155.3, 147.3, 141.9, 140.0, 137.9, 130.0, 129.9, 129.1, 128.5, 125.4, 75.2, 74.1, 70.1, 51.8, 38.1, 33.8, 31.8, 31.5, 25.3, 22.7, 21.2, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3054, 1733, 1422, 1266; [α]D=+83.31 (c=0.85 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 457.2702 for C26H37N2O5, found 457.2706.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-6)



embedded image


Acetonide (1S)-28 (20 mg, 0.0438 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (0.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (9 mg, 0.0387 mmol, 0.88 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was diluted with Et2O (20 mL), washed with H2O (20 mL), brine (20 mL), and the organic layer dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product (1S)-6 was isolated as a yellow oil (15 mg, 83%). Rf=0.36 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07-7.99 (m, 2H), 7.74-7.69 (m, 2H), 7.22 (dd, J=15.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J=15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (dd, J=7.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.51-4.47 (m, 1H), 3.85 (dt, J=8.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.37 (td, J=7.0, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 1.93-1.85 (m, 2H), 1.79-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.62-1.53 (m, 4H), 1.35-1.24 (m, 6H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.4, 155.3, 147.3, 141.8, 140.0, 137.9, 130.0, 129.9, 129.1, 128.5, 125.3, 75.2, 74.1, 70.2, 51.8, 38.1, 33.8, 31.8, 31.4, 25.3, 22.7, 21.2, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3434, 3054, 1734, 1422, 1265; [α]D=−14.33 (c=0.75 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 439.2209 for C23H32O5Na, found 439.2213.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(3-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-6)



embedded image


Acetonide (1R)-28 (25 mg, 0.055 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.5 mL) and camphorsulfonic acid (14 mg, 0.060 mmol, 1.1 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture concentrated and was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product (1R)-6 was isolated as a yellow oil (15 mg, 65%). Rf=0.36 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07-7.95 (m, 2H), 7.75-7.67 (m, 2H), 7.25-7.19 (dd, J=15.0, 6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J=15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.18-5.10 (m, 1H), 4.64 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.49-4.44 (m, 1H), 3.89-3.82 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.75 (s, 1H), 2.63 (s, 1H), 2.38 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.95-1.81 (m, 2H), 1.81-1.67 (m, 2H), 1.64-1.51 (m, 4H), 1.33-1.25 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 155.1, 147.1, 141.6, 139.9, 137.7, 129.8, 129.7, 128.9, 128.3, 125.3, 75.1, 74.0, 69.9, 51.6, 37.9, 33.6, 31.6, 31.5, 25.1, 22.6, 21.1, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3434, 3054, 1734, 1422, 1265; [α]D=+36.74 (c=0.7 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M]+ calc 417.2389 for C23H32O5, found 417.2371.


1-(3-Bromoquinoxalin-2-yl)octan-1-one (51)



embedded image


2-Bromoquinoxaline 50 (350 mg, 1.67 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in EtOAc (16 mL). Octanal (1.05 mL, 6.715 mmol, 4 eq) and TMSN3 (0.44 mL, 6.698 mmol, 2 eq) were added. PhI(OCOCF3)2 (1.44 g, 6.698 mmol, 2 eq) was added portionwise over 10 min and the mixture turned orange in colour. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Further TMSN3 (0.44 mL, 6.698 mmol, 2 eq) and PhI(OCOCF3)2 (1.44 g, 6.698 mmol, 2 eq) were added and reaction was stirred for 18 h. Triethylamine (2 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture was stirred for 15 min. The reaction mixture was concentrated and the crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (50:1 pentane:EtOAc) to afford product 51 as a yellow solid (259 mg, 61%). Rf=0.38 (10:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc); m.p.=43-48° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.90-7.81 (m, 2H), 3.18 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.83-1.75 (m, 2H), 1.44-1.28 (m, 8H), 0.89 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 201.5, 149.8, 143.3, 139.6, 134.8, 132.6, 131.2, 129.8, 128.61, 40.7, 31.8, 29.3, 29.2, 23.7, 22.8, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3429, 1708, 1560; HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 335.0759 for C16H20N2O79Br, found 335.0759.


(R)-1-(3-Bromoquinoxalin-2-yl)octan-1-ol ((1R)-52)



embedded image


Quinoxaline ketone 51 (90 mg, 0.268 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (3 mL). RuCl2[(S)-xylBinap][(S)-DAIPEN] (16 mg, 0.0134 mmol, 0.05 mmol), tBuOK (8 mg, 0.067 mmol, 0.25 eq) and triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred under 25 Bar of H2 for 18 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1 pentane:EtOAc) and product (1R)-52 was isolated as a pale yellow solid (37 mg, 41%). m.p.=48-54° C.; Rf=0.41 (10:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.15-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.88-7.76 (m, 2H), 5.24-5.15 (m, 1H), 4.04 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.13-2.01 (m, 1H), 1.65-1.57 (m, 3H), 1.29 (s, 8H), 0.89 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.0, 142.5, 139.7, 138.1, 130.7, 130.7, 128.5, 128.3, 71.4, 37.3, 31.8, 29.3, 29.2, 25.7, 22.6, 14.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3417, 1641; [α]D=+12.48 (c=1.7 in CHCl3); [M+H]+ calc 337.0915 for C16H22N2O79Br, found 337.0900; ee=99% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.43 min (S)-enantiomer, 4.18 min (R)-enantiomer.


(S)-1-(3-Bromoquinoxalin-2-yl)octan-1-ol ((1S)-52)



embedded image


Quinoxaline ketone 51 (100 mg, 0.298 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (3 mL). RuCl2[(S)-xylBinap][(S)-DAIPEN] (18 mg, 0.0145 mmol, 0.05 mmol), tBuOK (8 mg, 0.0745 mmol, 0.25 eq) and triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred under 25 Bar of H2 for 18 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1 pentane:EtOAc) and product (1S)-52 was isolated as a pale yellow solid (40 mg, 40%). [α]D=−21.63 (c=0.5 in CHCl3); ee=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.43 min (S)-enantiomer, 4.18 min (R)-enantiomer; Identical in all other physical data to the previously prepared (1R)-enantiomer.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((R)-1-hydroxyoctyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-53)



embedded image


Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (11 mg, 0.029 mmol, 0.15 eq) and dppb (21 mg, 0.048 mmol, 0.25 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Quinoxaline alcohol (1R)-52 (65 mg, 0.193 mmol, 1 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), and boronic ester 61 (81 mg, 0.231 mmol, 1.2 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.09 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.22 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.222 mmol, 1.15 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 46 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL), and the extracts washed with brine (15 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→6:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give product (1R)-53 as a pale yellow oil (38 mg, 40%). Rf=0.19 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.10-7.99 (m, 2H), 7.77-7.69 (m, 2H), 7.16 (dd, J=15.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J=15.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (td, J=7.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (td, J=6.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (ddd, J=9.0, 6.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.41-2.30 (m, 2H), 1.94-1.81 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.68 (m, 1H), 1.59 (s, 3H), 1.58-1.52 (m, 4H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 1.37-1.19 (m, 9H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 155.3, 147.0, 142.0, 140.0, 136.1, 129.9, 129.8, 129.3, 128.4, 125.5, 108.9, 78.5, 78.5, 70.0, 51.6, 38.3, 33.8, 31.9, 30.3, 29.5, 29.4, 28.4, 25.8, 25.7, 22.8, 22.0, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3461, 2910, 1737, 1645, 1381; [α]D=+11.48 (c=0.9 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 485.3015 for C28H41N2O5, found 485.3017.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyoctyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-53)



embedded image


Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (7 mg, 0.018 mmol, 0.15 eq) and dppb (13 mg, 0.03 mmol, 0.25 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Quinoxaline alcohol (1S)-52 (40 mg, 0.119 mmol, 1 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), and boronic ester 61 (57 mg, 0.161 mmol, 1.35 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.06 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.14 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.14 mmol, 1.15 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 42 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL), and the extracts washed with H2O (10 mL), brine (15 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give product (1S)-53 as a pale yellow oil (17 mg, 29%). Rf=0.19 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.09-7.99 (m, 2H), 7.76-7.68 (m, 2H), 7.17 (dd, J=15.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J=15.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (td, J=7.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (td, J=6.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (dt, J=8.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.43-2.27 (m, 2H), 1.93-1.82 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.69 (m, 1H), 1.59 (s, 3H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 5H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 1.32-1.24 (m, 8H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 155.3, 147.0, 142.0, 140.0, 136.0, 129.9, 129.9, 129.3, 128.4, 125.3, 108.9, 78.5, 78.5, 70.0, 51.7, 38.5, 33.8, 32.0, 30.4, 29.7, 29.4, 28.3, 25.9, 25.8, 22.8, 22.0, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3461, 2910, 1737, 1645, 1381; [α]D=−75.51 (c=0.9 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 485.3015 for C28H41N2O5, found 485.2994.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(3-((R)-1-hydroxyoctyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-7)



embedded image


Acetonide (1R)-53 (33 mg, 0.068 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (13 mg, 0.055 mmol, 0.8 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Further camphorsulfonic acid (13 mg, 0.055 mmol, 0.8 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was concentrated and was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product (1R)-7 was isolated as a yellow oil (11 mg, 37%). Rf=0.31 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06-7.97 (m, 2H), 7.74-7.67 (m, 2H), 7.24 (dd, J=15.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J=15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.18-5.11 (m, 1H), 4.63 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.51-4.43 (m, 1H), 3.89-3.82 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.65 (s, 1H), 2.54 (s, 1H), 2.38 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.95-1.84 (m, 2H), 1.81-1.66 (m, 2H), 1.63-1.52 (m, 4H), 1.29-1.21 (m, 8H), 0.85 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.1, 155.1, 147.0, 141.7, 139.9, 137.7, 129.8, 129.7, 129.0, 128.3, 125.3, 75.1, 74.0, 69.9, 51.6, 38.0, 33.6, 31.8, 31.4, 29.4, 29.2, 25.4, 22.6, 21.1, 14.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3386, 3020, 2254, 1720, 1216; [α]D=+33.52 (c=0.7 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 445.2702 for C25H37N2O5, found 445.2704.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(3-((S)-1-hydroxyoctyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-7)



embedded image


Acetonide (1S)-53 (20 mg, 0.041 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (8 mg, 0.034 mmol, 0.8 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3.5 h. The mixture was concentrated and was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product (1S)-7 was isolated as a yellow oil (7 mg, 39%). Rf=0.31 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.08-7.98 (m, 2H), 7.75-7.68 (m, 2H), 7.22 (dd, J=15.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J=15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.19-5.14 (m, 1H), 4.66 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.54-4.45 (m, 1H), 3.91-3.80 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.58 (s, 1H), 2.47 (s, 1H), 2.37 (td, J=7.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 1.94-1.84 (m, 2H), 1.81-1.65 (m, 2H), 1.61-1.51 (m, 4H), 1.31-1.23 (m, 8H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 155.2, 147.1, 141.7, 139.9, 137.7, 129.8, 129.7, 129.0, 128.3, 125.2, 75.1, 73.9, 70.0, 51.6, 38.0, 33.6, 31.8, 31.3, 29.4, 29.2, 25.5, 22.6, 21.0, 14.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3386, 3020, 2254, 1720, 1216; [α]D=−69.52 (c=0.7 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 445.2702 for C25H37N2O5, found 445.2722.


1-(3-Chloroquinoxalin-2-yl)butan-1-one (54)



embedded image


2-Chloroquinoxaline 11 (300 mg, 1.82 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in EtOAc (14 mL). Butyraldehyde (0.66 mL, 7.29 mmol, 4 eq) and TMSN3 (0.48 mL, 3.65 mmol, 2 eq) were added. PhI(OCOCF3)2 (1.57 g, 3.65 mmol, 2 eq) was added portionwise over 15 min and the mixture turned orange in colour. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Further TMSN3 (0.48 mL, 3.65 mmol, 2 eq) and PhI(OCOCF3)2 (1.57 g, 3.65 mmol, 2 eq) were added and reaction was stirred for 16 h. Triethylamine (2 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. The reaction mixture was concentrated and the crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (50:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to afford the product 54 as a yellow solid (234 mg, 57%). Rf=0.42 (10:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc); m.p.=33-36° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18-8.11 (m, 1H), 8.09-8.03 (m, 1H), 7.86 (m, 2H), 3.19 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.87-1.78 (m, 2H), 1.06 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 200.6, 148.5, 143.7, 142.3, 139.5, 132.6, 130.8, 129.6, 128.3, 42.3, 17.1, 13.7; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2983, 1710, 1260; HRMS (ESI) [M]+ calc 234.0560 for C12H11N2O35Cl. found 234.0560.


(R)-1-(3-Bromoquinoxalin-2-yl)butan-1-ol ((1R)-55)



embedded image


Quinoxaline ketone 54 (107 mg, 0.439 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (2.5 mL). RuCl2[(S)-xylBinap][(S)-DAIPEN] (26 mg, 0.0212 mmol, 0.048 mmol), tBuOK (12 mg, 0.107 mmol, 0.24 eq) and triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred under 25 Bar of H2 for 18 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (20:1→10:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product (1R)-55 was isolated as a pale yellow solid (75 mg, 69%). Rf=0.31 (20:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc); m.p.=100-104° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.09-8.04 (m, 1H), 8.04-7.99 (m, 1H), 7.79-7.73 (m, 2H), 5.19 (td, J=8.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (d, J=8.0, 1H), 2.04-1.94 (m, 1H), 1.65-1.54 (m, 3H), 0.98 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.9, 145.3, 141.7, 139.8, 130.8, 130.6, 128.5, 128.4, 70.3, 39.2, 18.9, 13.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3449, 3020, 1641, 1050; [α]D=−41.16 (c=2.0 in CHCl3); ee=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.02 min (S)-enantiomer, 3.45 min (R)-enantiomer.


(S)-1-(3-Bromoquinoxalin-2-yl)butan-1-ol ((1S)-55)



embedded image


Quinoxaline ketone 54 (107 mg, 0.439 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (2.5 mL). RuCl2[(R)-xylBinap][(R)-DAIPEN] (26 mg, 0.0212 mmol, 0.048 mmol), tBuOK (12 mg, 0.107 mmol, 0.24 eq) and triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred under 25 Bar of H2 for 18 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (20:1→10:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product (1S)-55 was isolated as a pale yellow solid (75 mg, 69%). [α]D=−41.16 (c=2 in CHCl3); ee=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.02 min (S)-enantiomer, 3.45 min (R)-enantiomer; Identical in all other physical data to the previously prepared (1R)-enantiomer.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((R)-1-hydroxybutyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-56)



embedded image


Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (18 mg, 0.048 mmol, 0.15 eq) and dppb (34 mg, 0.079 mmol, 0.25 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Quinoxaline alcohol (1R)-55 (75 mg, 0.317 mmol, 1 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), and boronic ester 61 (130 mg, 0.367 mmol, 1.16 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.09 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.37 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.37 mmol, 1.15 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 64 h. It was diluted with H2O (10 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL), and the extracts washed with brine (15 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→3:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to give product (1R)-56 as a pale yellow oil (36 mg, 27%). Rf=0.15 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.09-7.99 (m, 2H), 7.75-7.68 (m, 2H), 7.16 (dd, J=15.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (td, J=7.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (dt, J=8.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.39-2.32 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.72 (m, 3H), 1.62-1.50 (m, 8H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 0.98 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 155.3, 147.0, 142.0, 140.1, 136.1, 129.9, 129.8, 129.3, 128.4, 125.5, 108.9, 78.5, 78.5, 69.7, 51.7, 40.4, 33.8, 30.3, 28.4, 25.8, 22.0, 18.9, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3316, 2960, 1729, 1650, 1216; [α]D=+12.14 (c=1.0 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 429.2389 for C24H33N2O5, found 429.2396.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(3-((S)-1-hydroxybutyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-56)



embedded image


Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (15 mg, 0.038 mmol, 0.15 eq) and dppb (27 mg, 0.063 mmol, 0.25 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Quinoxaline alcohol (1S)-55 (60 mg, 0.253 mmol, 1 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), and boronic ester 61 (113 mg, 0.319 mmol, 1.26 eq), dissolved in toluene (1 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.08 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.29 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.29 mmol, 1.15 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL), and the extracts washed with brine (15 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (6:1→3:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to give product (1S)-56 as a pale yellow oil (30 mg, 28%). Rf=0.15 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10-7.98 (m, 2H), 7.77-7.67 (m, 2H), 7.17 (dd, J=15.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J=15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.21-5.13 (m, 1H), 4.86 (td, J=6.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (ddd, J=8.5, 6.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.40-2.31 (m, 2H), 1.92-1.81 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.68 (m, 1H), 1.59 (s, 3H), 1.59-1.50 (m, 5H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 0.96 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.7, 155.1, 146.9, 141.8, 139.8, 135.7, 129.7, 129.7, 129.1, 128.2, 125.1, 108.7, 78.3, 78.3, 69.6, 51.5, 40.3, 33.7, 30.2, 28.1, 25.6, 21.8, 18.9, 13.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3316, 2960, 1729, 1650, 1216; [α]D=−94.53 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 429.2389 for C24H33N2O5, found 429.2392.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(3-((R)-1-hydroxybutyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-5)



embedded image


Acetonide (1R)-56 (29 mg, 0.068 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (16 mg, 0.068 mmol, 1 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was diluted with Et2O (15 mL), washed with H2O (10 mL), brine (10 mL), and the organic layer dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product (1R)-5 was isolated as a yellow oil (12 mg, 46%). Rf=0.41 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05-7.93 (m, 2H), 7.72-7.65 (m, 2H), 7.22 (dd, J=15.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J=15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (dd, J=7.5, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.49-4.42 (m, 1H), 3.88-3.82 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.94 (s, 1H), 2.79 (s, 1H), 2.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.02-1.40 (m, 8H), 0.94 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.3, 155.3, 147.3, 141.8, 140.0, 138.1, 130.0, 129.9, 129.1, 128.4, 125.4, 75.3, 74.2, 69.8, 51.8, 40.1, 33.8, 31.7, 21.3, 18.8, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3020, 2976, 1734, 1216, 1095; [α]D=+27.63 (c=1.2 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 389.2076 for C21H29N2O5, found 389.2096.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(3-((S)-1-hydroxybutyl)quinoxalin-2-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-5)



embedded image


Acetonide (1S)-56 (28 mg, 0.065 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (16 mg, 0.069 mmol, 1.05 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h The mixture was diluted with Et2O (15 mL), washed with H2O (10 mL), brine (10 mL), and the organic layer dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product (1S)-5 was isolated as a yellow oil (14 mg, 56%). Rf=0.41 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07-7.95 (m, 2H), 7.75-7.64 (m, 2H), 7.21 (dd, J=15.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 5.22-5.10 (m, 1H), 4.72-4.61 (m, 1H), 4.53-4.45 (m, 1H), 3.90-3.81 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.93-2.55 (m, 2H), 2.37 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.96-1.67 (m, 4H), 1.59-1.48 (m, 4H), 0.95 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 155.2, 147.2, 141.6, 139.8, 137.8, 129.8, 129.7, 128.9, 128.3, 125.2, 75.1, 74.0, 69.8, 51.6, 40.0, 33.6, 31.3, 21.1, 18.7, 13.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3020, 2976, 1734, 1216, 1095; [α]D=−60.02 (c=1.4 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 389.2076 for C21H29N2O5, found 389.2076.


Compounds 1R-17 and 1S-17 of Formula (VIh), Compounds 1R-16 and 1S-16 of Formula (VIg) and Compounds 1R-48 and 1S-48 of Formula (Vii)
1-(4-Bromoisoquinolin-1-yl)hexan-1-one



embedded image


4-Bromoisoquinoline 24 (0.5 g, 2.40 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc (20 mL) and hexanal (1.18 mL, 9.61 mmol) and TMSN3 (0.63 mL, 4.81 mmol) were added. (Bis(trifluoroacetoxy)iodo)benzene (2.07 g, 4.81 mmol) was added slowly over 10 min and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Triethylamine (6.25 mL) was added and the reaction was stirred for 10 min. After removal of the solvents in vacuo the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (cyclohexane/MeOH, 99:1) to yield the ketone 22 (0.5 g, 68%) as an orange solid. TLC: Rf=0.52 (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.85 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.73 (s, 1H), 8.20 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (dd, J=8.5, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (dd, J=8.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.80-1.71 (m, 2H), 1.41-1.35 (m, 4H), 0.91 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 204.3, 152.6, 143.0, 135.7, 131.6, 129.8, 127.3, 127.0, 126.3, 123.6, 40.5, 31.6, 24.0, 22.7, 14.1; IR (vmax) 3053, 2957, 1697, 1560, 1490, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 306.0498 [M+H] C15H17NOBr requires 306.0494.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-hexanoylisoquinolin-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Pd(OAc)2 (2.5 mg, 0.01 mmol), P(o-tolyl)3 (7 mg, 0.02 mmol) and tributylamine (0.85 mL, 3.59 mmol) were sealed under nitrogen and stirred at 80° C. for 10 min. Ketone 22 (50 mg, 0.163 mmol) and alkene 23 (74 mg, 0.179 mmol) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 120° C. for 36 h. After filtering through a pad of silica with EtOAc (250 mL) most of the solvent (200 mL) was removed in vacuo and the remaining solution was washed with 10% (w/v) CuSO4 solution (3×20 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with water (50 mL) and brine (50 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1) to afford 34 (74 mg, 70%) as an orange oil. TLC: Rf=0.31 (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1); [α]D20−16.3 (c=0.55, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.93-8.89 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.65 (s, 1H), 8.11 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.76-7.71 (m, 1H), 7.70-7.65 (m, 1H), 7.16 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (dd, J=15.9, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.31-4.26 (m, 1H), 3.77 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.31 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.81-1.73 (m, 4H), 1.66-1.54 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.38 (m, 4H), 0.95 (s, 9H), 0.92 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (s, 9H), 0.09 (4×s, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 205.0, 174.1, 152.5, 138.8, 137.4, 134.7, 131.9, 130.4, 128.8, 127.3, 125.5, 125.0, 123.3, 77.2, 76.2, 51.6, 40.4, 34.4, 33.4, 31.7, 26.1, 26.1, 24.1, 22.7, 20.7, 18.5, 18.3, 14.1, −3.8, −3.8, −4.4, −4.4; IR (neat) (vmax) 3054, 2963, 2928, 2855, 1735, 1677, 1420, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 642.3979 [M+H]+ C36H60NO5Si2 requires 642.4010.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-(1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Ketone 34 (70 mg, 0.11 mmol) was dissolved in dry methanol (4 mL) and sodium borohydride (8.4 mg, 0.22 mmol) was added at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2.5 h and quenched with acetone (4 mL). The solvent was evaporated and saturated NH4Cl solution (20 mL) and Et2O (10 mL) were added. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase extracted with Et2O (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the yellow residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1) to afford epi-35 (60 mg, 85%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.57 (pentane/EtOAc, 15:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (s, 1H), 8.12-8.02 (m, 2H), 7.77-7.68 (m, 1H), 7.66-7.60 (m, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (dd, J=15.8, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 5.47-5.42 (m, 1H), 5.17-4.93 (s, br, 1H), 4.30-4.24 (m, 1H), 3.79-3.73 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.33 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.76-1.60 (m, 4H), 1.38-1.26 (m, 8H), 0.95 (s, 9H), 0.88-0.86 (m, 12H), 0.12-0.03 (4×s, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.1, 160.7, 138.1, 135.6, 134.5, 130.3, 128.3, 127.2, 125.2, 124.6, 124.4, 124.1, 77.3, 76.3, 69.8, 51.6, 39.5, 34.5, 33.3, 32.0, 29.9, 29.8, 26.1, 26.1, 25.5, 22.8, 20.8, 18.5, 18.4, 14.2, −3.8, −3.8, −4.4, −4.4; HRMS (ESI) Found 666.3990 [M+Na]+ C36H61NO5NaSi2 requires 666.3986.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


A mixture of formic acid (0.03 mL, 670 μmol) and triethylamine (0.05 mL, 390 μmol) was added to ketone 34 (100 mg, 0.16 μmol) with RuCl-(p-cymene)[R,R-TsDPEN], (R,R)-46, (5 mg, 8 μmol) in anhydrous DMF (1 mL). The mixture was degassed by freeze-thaw cycles and stirred at 27° C. for 24 h. The mixture was neutralised with saturated NaHCO3 solution (5 mL) and diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1) to afford (1R)-35 (55 mg, 55%) as an orange oil. de=96%, as determined by chiral SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2: 2-PrOH, 99:1 to 85:15 after 1 min); flow rate: 3 mL/min; Rt-(1S)=1.91 min, Rt-(1R)=2.24 min; TLC: Rf=0.36 (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1); [α]D20+1.9 (c=1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.74-7.70 (m, 1H), 7.66-7.61 (m, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (dd, J=15.8, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (t, J=6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (s, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J=6.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.33 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.01-1.92 (m, 1H), 1.83-1.56 (m, 6H), 1.53-1.44 (m, 1H), 1.34-1.26 (m, 4H), 0.94 (s, 9H), 0.89-0.84 (m, 12H), 0.16-0.04 (4×s, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.1, 160.8, 138.1, 135.6, 134.5, 130.3, 128.3, 127.2, 125.1, 124.6, 124.4, 124.1, 77.3, 76.3, 69.8, 51.6, 39.6, 34.5, 33.3, 32.0, 26.2, 26.1, 25.5, 22.8, 20.8, 18.5, 18.4, 14.2, −3.8, −3.8, −4.4, −4.4; IR (vmax) 3623, 3054, 2928, 2852, 1734, 1450, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 644.4145 [M+H]+ C36H62NO5Si2 requires 644.4167.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


A mixture of formic acid (0.03 mL, 670 μmol) and triethylamine (0.05 mL, 390 μmol) was added to a mixture of ketone 34 (100 mg, 0.16 μmol) and RuCl-(p-cymene)[S,S-TsDPEN] (S,S)-46, (5 mg, 8 μmol) in anhydrous DMF (1 mL). The mixture was degassed by freeze-thaw cycles and then stirred at 27° C. for 48 h. The mixture was neutralised with saturated NaHCO3 solution (5 mL) and diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1) to afford (1S)-35, (73 mg, 73%) as an orange oil. de=88%, as determined by chiral SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2: 2-PrOH, 99:1 to 85:15 after 1 min); flow rate: 3 mL/min; Rt-(S)=2.03 min, Rt-(R)=2.37 min; TLC: Rf=0.42 (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1); [α]D20−21.9 (c=1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76-7.71 (m, 1H), 7.66-7.60 (m, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (dd, J=15.8, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.48-5.42 (m, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J=6.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79-3.73 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.33 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.01-1.92 (m, 1H), 1.83-1.70 (m, 2H), 1.66-1.46 (m, 5H), 1.33-1.22 (m, 4H), 0.96-0.93 (m, 9H), 0.87 (s, 12H) 0.17-0.02 (4×s, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.1, 160.8, 138.1, 135.6, 134.5, 130.3, 128.3, 127.2, 125.2, 124.6, 124.4, 124.1, 77.3, 76.2, 69.8, 51.6, 39.6, 34.5, 33.3, 32.0, 26.1, 26.1, 25.6, 22.8, 20.8, 18.5, 18.3, 14.2, −3.8, −3.8, −4.4, −4.4; IR (vmax) 3428, 3055, 2929, 2852, 1735, 1642, 1450, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 644.4195 [M+H]+ C36H62NO5Si2 requires 644.4167.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(1-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (0.20 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 0.20 mmol) was added to alcohol (1R)-35 (50 mg, 0.08 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo at 25° C. and the residue was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to afford diol (1R)-17 (14 mg, 40%) as a yellow wax. TLC: Rf=0.13 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20+22.9 (c=0.32, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.58 (s, 1H), 8.24 (m, 2H), 7.85 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (dd, J=15.6, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.47-5.42 (m, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J=5.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.69-3.64 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 2.99 (s, 1H), 2.37 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.87-1.26 (m, 12H) 0.89 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD3CN) δ 174.8, 162.0, 138.8, 135.5, 135.1, 131.5, 129.3, 128.2, 125.9, 125.8, 125.2, 124.8, 76.3, 74.8, 70.6, 51.8, 39.7, 34.4, 32.6, 32.4, 26.1, 23.3, 22.2, 14.3; IR (vmax) 3392, 2959, 2930, 1733, 1649, 1569, 1487, 1462, 1380 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 416.2444 [M+H]+ C24H34NO5 requires 416.2437.


(S)-6-((R,E)-1-Hydroxy-3-(1-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)allyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one

The lactone was isolated by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to afford (1R)-48 (14 mg, 16%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.14 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20+15.8 (c=0.95, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.57 (s, 1H), 8.25-8.14 (m, 2H), 7.85 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.75-7.66 (m, 1H), 7.27 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (dd, J=15.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.57-5.42 (m, 1H), 4.53 (dd, J=5.0, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.49-4.40 (m, 1H), 3.41 (s, br, 1H), 3.15 (s, br, 1H), 2.56-2.39 (m, 2H), 1.87-1.63 (m, 4H), 1.52-1.20 (m, 8H), 0.87 (t, J=7.1 Hz 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD3CN) δ 171.4, 161.8, 138.2, 134.8, 131.0, 130.9, 128.5, 127.6, 127.1, 124.9, 124.5, 124.3, 83.1, 73.5, 70.0, 39.6, 31.9, 30.0, 25.6, 22.9, 21.9, 18.6, 14.3; IR (vmax) 3675, 3409, 3221, 2968, 1731, 1650, 1569, 1461, 1393 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 384.2188 [M+H]+ C23H30NO requires 384.2175.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(1-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (0.20 mL, 1 M in THF, 0.20 mmol) was added to a solution of alcohol (1S)-35 (50 mg, 0.08 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo at 25° C. and the residue was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to afford diol (1S)-17 (13 mg, 38%) as a yellow wax. TLC: Rf=0.13 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20−29.8 (c=3.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (dd, J=8.4, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J=8.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (dd, J=15.7, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (dd, J=7.8, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (dd, J=6.0, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (td, J=6.9, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.00 (s, br, 1H), 2.39 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.98-1.87 (m, 2H), 1.83-1.23 (m, 12H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.3, 161.2, 138.1, 134.4, 132.4, 130.5, 127.9, 127.4, 126.7, 124.6, 124.3, 124.1, 75.8, 74.0, 69.8, 51.8, 39.5, 33.8, 31.9, 31.7, 25.5, 22.8, 21.2, 14.2; IR (vmax) 3420, 3054, 2987, 2927, 1729, 1648, 1421, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 416.2422 [M+H]+ C24H34NO5 requires 416.2437.


(S)-6-((R,E)-1-Hydroxy-3-(1-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-4-yl)allyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one

The lactone was isolated by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to yield (1S)-48 (8 mg, 21%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.14 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20−26.2 (c=0.85, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.16-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.83-7.73 (m, 1H), 7.71-7.64 (m, 1H), 7.40 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (dd, J=15.8, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.53-5.43 (m, 1H), 4.72 (dd, J=6.9, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.59-4.46 (m, 1H), 2.78-2.43 (m, 2H), 2.11-1.85 (m, 5H), 1.74-1.24 (m, 9H), 0.89 (t, J=5.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.4, 161.4, 138.0, 134.4, 130.7, 130.7, 127.8, 127.5, 127.0, 124.7, 124.3, 124.1, 82.9, 73.3, 69.8, 39.5, 31.9, 29.9, 25.5, 22.8, 21.9, 18.5, 14.2; IR (vmax) 3675, 3408, 2966, 1730, 1651, 1568, 1381, 1251 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 384.2185 [M+H]+ C23H30NO requires 384.2175.


1-(3-Bromoisoquinolin-1-yl)hexan-1-one



embedded image


3-Bromoisoquinoline 51 (0.5 g, 2.40 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc (20 mL) and hexanal 25 (1.18 mL, 9.61 mmol) and TMSN3 (0.63 mL, 4.81 mmol) were added. (Bis(trifluoroacetoxy)iodo)benzene (2.07 g, 4.81 mmol) was added slowly over 45 min and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Triethylamine (6.25 mL) was added and the reaction was stirred for 10 min. After removal of the solvents in vacuo the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1) to yield the ketone 50 (0.44 g, 60%) as an orange oil. TLC: Rf=0.65 (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.81 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.83-7.63 (m, 3H), 3.29 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.81-1.73 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.37 (m, 4H), 0.92 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 203.7, 153.8, 139.4, 133.8, 131.4, 129.5, 127.8, 127.2, 126.2, 124.8, 40.4, 31.6, 23.9, 22.7, 14.1; IR (vmax) 3056, 2986, 2957, 1700, 1560, 1490, 1266, 1046 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 306.0489 [M+H] C15H17NOBr requires 306.0494.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-hexanoylisoquinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Pd(OAc)2 (11 mg, 0.05 mmol), P(o-tolyl)3 (41 mg, 0.14 mmol) and tributylamine (3.55 mL, 15.0 mmol) were sealed under nitrogen and stirred at 80° C. for 10 min. Alkene 23 (341 mg, 0.82 mmol) and ketone 50 (208 mg, 0.68 mmol) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 120° C. for 72 h. After filtering through silica with EtOAc (250 mL) most of the solvent (200 mL) was removed in vacuo and the remaining solution was washed with 10% (w/v) CuSO4 solution (3×20 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with water (50 mL) and brine (50 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1) to afford 52 (255 mg, 40%) as an orange oil. TLC: Rf=0.38 (pentane/EtOAc, 19:1); [α]D20−10.0 (c=1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.80 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.68-7.63 (m, 1H), 7.61-7.55 (m, 2H), 6.94 (dd, J=15.5, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (dd, J=7.1, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (dt, J=6.4, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.34 (t, J=7.5, 2H), 2.33 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.81-1.74 (m, 4H), 1.68-1.58 (m, 2H) 1.43-1.37 (m, 4H), 0.96-0.90 (m, 15H) 0.86 (s, 9H), 0.13-0.00 (4×s, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 205.4, 174.2, 153.2, 147.4, 138.0, 135.9, 130.4, 130.2, 128.4, 127.2, 127.0, 125.0, 121.5, 76.9, 76.0, 51.6, 40.4, 34.6, 33.2, 31.8, 26.1, 26.1, 24.2, 22.7, 20.5, 18.4, 18.3, 14.2, −3.7, −3.9, −4.3, −4.5; IR (vmax) 3054, 2929, 2852, 1734, 1680, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 664.3820 [M+Na]+ C36H59NO5NaSi2 requires 664.3830.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


A mixture of formic acid (0.06 mL, 1.61 mmol) and triethylamine (0.13 mL, 0.94 mmol) was added to ketone 52 (240 mg, 0.37 mmol) and RuCl-(p-cymene)[R,R-TsDPEN], (R,R)-46, (19 mg, 0.02 mmol). Anhydrous DMF (1.8 mL) was added and the mixture was degassed by freeze-thaw cycles and then stirred at 27° C. for 24 h. The mixture was neutralised with saturated NaHCO3 solution (5 mL) and diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1) to afford (1R)-54 (119 mg, 50%) as an orange oil. de=94%, as determined by chiral UPLC using a Chiralpak OD column (heptane:2-PrOH, 98.5:1,5); flow rate: 1 mL/min; Rt-(1S)=3.93 min, Rt-(1R)=5.69 min; TLC: Rf=0.44 (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1); [α]D20+6.0 (c=1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.97 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.70-7.62 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.51 (m, 1H), 7.39 (s, 1H), 6.86 (dd, J=15.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 5.46-5.39 (m, 1H), 5.36-5.30 (m, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J=7.6, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 3.73-3.67 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.32 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.01-1.54 (m, 6H), 1.37-1.27 (m, 6H), 0.94-0.82 (m, 21H), 0.15-0.04 (4×s, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 161.4, 146.5, 137.5, 135.4, 130.5, 130.2, 127.8, 126.9, 124.4, 124.2, 118.1, 77.4, 75.9, 69.7, 51.6, 39.4, 34.6, 33.0, 32.0, 29.9, 26.1, 26.1, 22.8, 20.5, 18.4, 18.3, 14.2, −3.7, −3.9, −4.3, −4.5; IR (vmax) 3445, 3054, 2986, 2929, 2852, 1734, 1450, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 644.4144 [M+H]+ C36H62NO5Si2 requires 644.4167.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-bis((tert-butyidimethylsilyl)oxy)-8-(1-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


A mixture of formic acid (0.03 mL, 0.67 mmol) and triethylamine (0.06 mL, 0.39 mmol) was added to ketone 52 (100 mg, 0.16 mmol) and RuCl-(p-cymene)[S,S-TsDPEN], (S,S)-46, (5 mg, 0.01 mmol). Anhydrous DMF (0.7 mL) was added and the mixture was degassed by freeze-thaw cycles and then stirred at 27° C. for 24 h. The mixture was neutralised with saturated NaHCO3 (5 mL) and diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1) to afford (1S)-54 (65 mg, 65%) as an orange oil. de=94%, as determined by chiral UPLC using a Chiralpak OD column (heptane:2-PrOH, 98.5:1.5); flow rate: 1 mL/min; Rt-(1S)=3.95 min, Rt-(1R)=5.65 min; TLC: Rf=0.41 (pentane/EtOAc, 9:1); [α]D20−14.0 (c=1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.97 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69-7.62 (m, 1H), 7.57-7.51 (m, 1H), 7.40 (s, 1H), 6.89 (dd, J=15.5, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 5.47-5.37 (m, 1H), 4.23 (t, J=5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.73-3.67 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.38-3.24 (m, 1H), 2.32 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.82-1.53 (m, 6H), 1.51-1.18 (m, 6H), 0.97-0.81 (m, 21H), 0.13-0.02 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 161.3, 146.5, 137.4, 135.3, 130.5, 130.0, 127.8, 126.9, 124.4, 124.2, 118.1, 76.7, 76.0, 69.7, 51.6, 39.4, 34.6, 33.0, 32.0, 29.8, 26.1, 26.1, 22.8, 20.5, 18.4, 18.3, 14.2, −3.8, −3.9, −4.3, −4.5; IR (vmax) 3407, 3055, 2968, 2928, 2856, 1734, 1643, 1450, 1422, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 644.4156 [M+H]+ C36H62NO5Si2 requires 644.4167.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(1-(R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (0.23 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 0.23 mmol) was added to alcohol (1R)-54 (60 mg, 0.09 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3.6 mL) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo at 25° C. and the residue was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to afford (1R)-16 (11.6 mg, 30%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.16 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20+17.5 (c=0.11, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.13 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.76-7.69 (m, 1H), 7.63-7.56 (m, 2H), 7.00 (dd, J=15.6, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H), 5.43-5.35 (m, 1H), 4.26-4.13 (m, 1H), 3.65-3.60 (m, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.32 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.85-1.24 (m, 15H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN) δ 174.8, 162.7, 147.4, 138.3, 134.2, 131.6, 130.8, 128.6, 127.9, 125.6, 125.0, 119.0, 76.0, 74.8, 70.6, 51.8, 39.8, 34.4, 32.5, 32.4, 26.2, 23.3, 22.2, 14.3; IR (vmax) 3402, 3055, 2956, 2854, 1724, 1645, 1462, 1378 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 416.2420 [M+H]+ C24H34NO5 requires 416.2437.


(S)-6-((R,E)-1-Hydroxy-3-(1-(R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-3-yl)allyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one

The lactone was isolated by preparative TLC (CH2Cl/MeOH, 96:4) to yield (1R)-55 (7 mg, 18%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.26 (CH2Cl/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20+5.5 (c=0.24, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.98 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.71-7.65 (m, 1H), 7.61-7.55 (m, 1H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.00-6.85 (m, 2H), 5.45-5.41 (m, 1H), 4.75-4.70 (m, 1H), 4.53-4.48 (m, 1H), 2.69-2.45 (m, 2H), 2.34 (s, br, 1H), 2.21 (s, br, 1H), 2.04-1.82 (m, 4H), 1.68-1.49 (m, 2H), 1.37-1.27 (m, 6H), 0.88 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.7, 161.6, 145.6, 137.3, 132.3, 131.3, 130.7, 128.7, 127.9, 127.3, 124.4, 119.0, 83.0, 73.0, 69.9, 39.5, 31.9, 29.9, 25.7, 22.8, 21.5, 18.5, 14.2; IR (vmax) 3430, 3055, 2928, 1730, 1641, 1432, 1266 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 384.2179 [M+H]+ C23H30NO4 requires 384.2175.


(5S,6R,E)-Methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(1-(S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-3-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (0.20 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 0.20 mmol) was added to alcohol (1S)-54 (50 mg, 0.08 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo at 25° C. and the residue was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to afford (1S)-16 (11 mg, 34%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.21 (CH2Cl/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20−2.6 (c=0.45, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.13 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.75-7.69 (m, 1H), 7.63-7.57 (m, 2H), 6.99 (dd, J=15.5, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 5.41-5.37 (m, 1H), 4.20 (m, 1H), 3.65-3.60 (m, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.20 (s, br, 1H), 2.90 (s, br, 1H), 2.32 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.84-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.69-1.28 (m, 12H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN) δ 174.8, 162.7, 147.4, 138.3, 134.2, 131.6, 130.9, 128.6, 128.0, 125.6, 125.0, 119.0, 76.1, 74.9, 70.6, 51.8, 39.8, 34.4, 32.5, 32.5, 26.2, 23.3, 22.2, 14.3; IR (vmax) 3424, 3055, 2988, 1723, 1642, 1422, 1368, 1265 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 438.2238 [M+Na] C24H33NO5Na requires 433.2256.


(S)-6-((R,E)-1-Hydroxy-3-(1-(S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)isoquinolin-3-yl)allyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one

The lactone was isolated by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4) to yield (1S)-55 (6 mg, 19%) as a yellow oil. TLC: Rf=0.28 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 96:4); [α]D20−11.2 (c=0.75, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.99 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (m, 1H), 7.58 (m, 1H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 6.96-6.86 (m, 2H), 5.42 (dd, J=6.1, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (dd, J=5.0, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (ddd, J=7.7, 6.3, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, br, 1H), 2.68-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.35 (s, br, 1H), 2.04-1.84 (m, 4H), 1.67-1.49 (m, 2H) 1.35-1.22 (m, 6H), 0.88 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.7, 161.6, 145.5, 137.4, 132.3, 131.4, 130.7, 128.7, 127.8, 127.3, 124.4, 119.0, 83.0, 73.0, 69.9, 39.6, 31.8, 29.8, 25.7, 22.8, 21.5, 18.6, 14.2; IR (vmax) 3433, 3056, 2924, 1730, 1642, 1427 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) Found 384.2185 [M+H]+ C23H30NO4 requires 384.2175.


Compounds Ox_10 and Ox_11 of Formula (VIj) and Compounds Ox_13 and Ox_14 of Formula (VIj2)
Ethyl 2-aminooxazole-4-carboxylate



embedded image


The compound was synthesised in two steps from Ethyl 2-aminooxazole-4-carboxylate using a known published procedure.


Ethyl 2-chlorooxazole-4-carboxylate



embedded image


The compound was synthesised in one step from Ethyl 2-aminooxazole-4-carboxylate using a known published procedure.


Ethyl 2-phenyloxazole-4-carboxylate



embedded image


The compound was synthesised from Ethyl 2-aminooxazole-4-carboxylate using a known published procedure.


N-Methoxy-N-methyl-2-phenyloxazole-4-carboxamide



embedded image


In a round bottom flask (50 mL), known phenyloxazole Ox_4 (0.31 g, 1.40 mmoL) and CH3ONHCH3·HCl (0.21 g, 2.22 mmol) were dissolved in dry THE (10 mL). The solution was cooled to −20° C. in a NaCl ice bath. iPrMgCl (2.23 mL, 2 M in THF, 4.50 mmol) was added dropwise. After 2 h, NH4Cl (4 mL) and EtOAc (5 mL) were added. The solution was left to warm to room temperature and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×5 mL). Afterwards the organic layers were combined, washed with brine (20 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The compound was purified by column chromatography using silica gel (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) affording the Weinreb amide Ox_5 as a yellow oil (0.267 g, 83%), Rf: 0.74 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); m.p.=93-95° C.; HRMS calculated for C12H13N2O3: 233.0926, found: 233.0930. IR (vmax)=1026.01, 1120.80, 1216.04, 1483.86, 1561.76, 1648.50, 2400.73, 2874.89, 2937.96, 2973.11, 3018.56 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.08 (m, 2H), 7.42 (m, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.41 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.39, 156.35, 142.48, 134.58, 130.91, 129.44, 128.74, 128.71, 61.41, 33.29.


1-(2-Phenyloxazol-4-yl)hexan-1-one



embedded image


In a round bottom flask (150 mL), activated magnesium turnings (0.19 g, 7.80 mmol, 3 eq), bromopentane (0.97 mL, 7.8 mmol), a crystal of iodine were dissolved in dry THE (20 mL). The reaction was refluxed for 1.5 h. The Weinreb amide Ox_5 was dissolved in dry THE (30 mL) and added via cannula to the reaction mixture which was refluxed for another 1.5 h. The solution was left to cool down to room temperature then saturated ammonium chloride (100 mL) was added. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (2×50 mL). The organic layers were combined, washed with H2O (100 mL) and brine (100 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography using silica gel (9:1 pentane:EtOAc) giving the product Ox_6 as a yellow oil (0.44 g, 69%); Rf: 0.78 (9:1 Pentane:EtOAc); m.p.=180° C. decomposition; HRMS calculated for C15H18NO2: 244.1338, found: 244.1332. IR (vmax)=1057.93, 1448.99, 1678.56, 2346.42, 2862.19, 2922.60, 2957.76, 3119.31 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ=8.24 (s, 1H), 8.10 (m, 2H), 7.50 (m, 3H), 2.97 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.76 (p, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.38 (m, 4H), 0.92 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.75, 161.95, 141.82, 141.75, 131.07, 128.87, 126.80, 126.67, 39.92, 31.45, 23.58, 22.48, 13.95.


1-(5-Bromo-2-phenyloxazol-4-yl)hexan-1-one



embedded image


In a flame dried round bottom flask (150 mL), the ketone Ox_6 (0.44 g, 1.80 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (25 mL). NBS (1.28 g, 7.2 mmol) was added and the reaction was refluxed for 16 h. Saturated sodium carbonate (80 mL) and CH2Cl2 (80 mL) were added. The layers were separated and the organic layer was washed with brine (80 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography using silica gel (9:1 pentane:EtOAc) yielding the product Ox_7 as a white solid (0.404 g, 70%); Rf: 0.88 (9:1 Pentane:EtOAc); m.p.=72-73° C.; HRMS calculated for C15H16NO2NaBr: 344.0262, found: 344.0265. IR (vmax)=689.99, 909.24, 1127.97, 1449.87, 1691.04, 2253.96, 2334.75, 2860.01, 2929.73, 2958.32 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=8.05 (m, 2H), 6=7.50 (m, 3H), 3.01 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (p, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (m, 4H), 0.90 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.09, 161.88, 137.30, 131.35, 128.92 (2 C), 126.49 (2 C), 125.97, 125.58, 40.11, 31.37, 23.27, 22.47, 13.93.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-hexanoyl-2-phenyloxazol-5-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate



embedded image


In a 25 mL flame dried round bottom flask the boronic ester 61 (50 mg, 0.14 mmol, 1.1 eq), the oxazole Ox_7 (41 mg, 0.13 mmol, 1 eq) and Pd(PPh3)4 (15 mg, 0.013 mmol, 10 mol %) were set under N2 atmosphere. DMF (2.5 mL) and 1 M Na2CO3 (0.7 mL) were freeze-pump-thaw degassed and then the solution was added to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 16 h. The solution was left to cool, then 1 M HCl (15 mL) and EtOAc (30 mL) were added. The layers were separated, the organic layer was washed with 1 M HCl (5 mL), brine (5 mL) and dried over MgSO4. Concentration in vacuo and purification by column chromatography using silica gel (4:1 pentane:EtOAc) yielded the product Ox_8 as a dark orange oil (45 mg, 74%). Rf: 0.75 (4:1 Pentane:EtOAc); HRMS calculated for C27H35NO6Na: 492.2362, found: 492.2363. IR (vmax)=1026.07, 1082.38, 1215.93, 1370.88, 1449.90, 1559.29, 1684.78, 1737.41, 2869.23, 2925.79 (b) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.09 (m, 2H), 7.53-7.45 (m, 3H), 7.26 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (dd, J=16.0, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (dd, J=7.7, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.03 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (dt, J=11.3, 5.7 Hz, 2H), 1.80 (m, 2H), 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.56 (s, 3H), 1.50 (m, 2H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 1.39-1.35 (m, 4H), 0.91 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.63, 173.70, 159.22, 150.99, 141.72, 135.27, 132.92, 131.00, 128.83 (2 C), 126.76 (2 C)n, 126.62, 118.88, 108.84, 78.77, 78.31, 40.19, 33.65, 31.44, 29.92, 28.22, 25.58 (2 C), 23.47, 22.49, 21.80, 13.94. [α]D=1.97 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 8-(4-hexanoyl-2-phenyloxazol-5-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate



embedded image


In a 10 mL round bottom flask Oxazole Ox_8 (0.046 g, 0.980 mmol), ZrCl4 (0.046 g, 0.199 mmol) were dissolved in dry methanol (2 mL). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was concentrated at room temperature in vacuo and purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (1:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give the product as a yellow oil (0.024 g, 56%). Rf: 0.4 (1:1 Pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.08 (m, 2H), 7.55 (m, 3H), 7.17 (dd, J=16.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (dd, J=16.4, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (ddd, J=10, 5.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.37 (m, 1H), 2.98 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.32 (dt, J=7.6, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 1.80 (m, 2H), 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 1.40 (m, 2H), 1.36 (m, 2H), 0.92 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.07, 173.75, 158.76, 151.69, 137.94, 134.46, 131.07, 129.08, 126.65, 126.40, 116.13, 74.54, 73.72, 50.88, 39.73, 33.38, 31.60, 31.17, 23.26, 22.22, 21.15, 13.25. [α]D=−7.57 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(5S,6R,E)-isopropyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-2-phenyloxazol-5-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


In a 10 mL conical flask the ketone Ox_9 (0.03 g, 0.177 mmol), RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)] (0.0106 g, 0.0064 mmol, 5 mol %) and potassium tert-butoxide (0.0199 g, 0.177 mmol) were dissolved in iso-propanol (2 mL). Tri-isopropyl borate (0.01 mL, 0.04 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator at 8 bar for 24 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (1:2 pentane:EtOAc) to give the product Ox_11 as a white wax (0.009 g, 28%, 98.4% de). Rf: 0.36 (1:2 Pentane:EtOAc); HRMS calculated for C26H37NO6Na: 482.2519 found: 482.2525. IR (vmax)=1107.82, 1260.12, 1374.76, 1486.42, 1550.04, 1668.28, 1729.21, 2065.79, 2181.16, 2870.60, 2926.52, 3379.56 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.04 (m, 2H), 7.51 (m, 3H), 6.72 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (dd, J=16.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (sep, 5 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (m, 1H), 4.14 (m, 1H), 3.56 (m, 1H), 2.26 (m, 2H), 1.79 (m, 2H), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.52 (m, 2H), 1.37 (m, 2H), 1.29 (m, 2H), 1.17 (d, J=5 Hz, 6H), 0.88 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD3CN) δ 173.62, 160.11, 145.75, 141.16, 131.18, 130.65, 129.72, 127.94, 126.69, 116.27, 75.45, 74.40, 67.81, 66.74, 37.05, 34.66, 32.14, 32.02, 25.69, 23.13, 21.96, 21.72, 14.14. [α]D=−3.26 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(5S,6R,E)-isopropyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-2-phenyloxazol-5-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


In a 10 mL conical flask the ketone Ox_9 (0.119 g, 0.277 mmol), RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)] (0.0348 g, 0.021 mmol, 5 mol %) and potassium tert-butoxide (0.0327 g, 0.290 mmol) were dissolved in iso-propanol (2 mL). Tri-isopropyl borate (0.02 mL, 0.08 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator at 8 bar for 24 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (1:2 pentane:EtOAc) to give the product as a white wax (0.016 g, 12%, 96% de). Rf: 0.36 (1:2 Pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (m, 2H), 7.54-7.33 (m, 3H), 6.68 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (dd, J=15.7, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (sep, J=5 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (s, 1H), 4.31 (s, 1H), 3.78 (s, 1H), 2.32 (m, 2H), 1.83 (m, 2H), 1.71 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.39 (m, 2H), 1.30 (m, 4H), 1.24 (m, 2H), 1.20 (m, 3H), 1.18 (m, 3H), 0.89 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.32, 160.51, 144.19, 140.89, 130.53, 128.68, 127.68, 127.06, 126.50, 117.10, 75.16, 73.78, 67.65, 67.29, 37.19, 34.20, 31.59, 31.38, 29.66, 25.16, 22.55, 21.77, 20.97, 14.03.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-hexanoyloxazol-2-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate



embedded image


In a 100 mL round bottom flask, Chlorooxazole Ox_3 (0.5 g, 2.848 mmol) was dissolved in dry toluene (25 mL). The reaction was cooled to −78° C. and DIBAL-H (2.35 mL of 25 wt % in toluene) was slowly added. A magnesium n-pentane bromide solution (24 mL, 0.36 M) was slowly added to the reaction at −78° C. The reaction was stirred for 2 h prior quenching by adding water (5 mL). The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×50 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was dissolved in toluene (20 mL) in a 50 mL flame dried round bottom flask with boronic ester (0.56 g, 1.57 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (0.083 g, 0.0718 mmol). 2 M K2CO3 (1.4 mL) was added to the reaction flask and the reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 16 h. The solution was left to cool to r.t, then water (15 mL) and EtOAc (10 mL) were added. The layers were separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×30 mL) and dried over MgSO4. Concentration in vacuo and filtration with a silica plug (3:2 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to give a crude mixture. The off yellow crude mixture (0.156 g) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (30 mL), Dess-Martin reagent (0.198 g, 0.468 mmol) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. A saturated solution of Na2S2O3 (15 mL) was added. The solution was vigorously stirred for 0.5 h. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2, (2×20 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography using silica gel (3:2 Cyclohexane:EtOAc) yielding the product Ox_12 as a white wax (0.120 g, 10.1% over 4 steps) Rf: 0.67 (3:2 Pentane:EtOAc); HRMS calculated for C21H33NO6: 394.2230 found: 394.2235. IR (vmax)=862.14, 882.62, 949.30, 982.05. 1052.95, 1082.05, 1116.23, 1216.51, 1372.13, 1437.72, 1457.88, 1559.77, 1691.06, 1734.91, 2009.08, 2259.46, 2871.37, 2932.89, 2954.37, 2984.79, 3141.62, 3248.56, 3367.79 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.11 (s, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J=15.9, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (dd, J=16.0, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (td, J=6.3, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (ddd, J=8.9, 6.3, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.91-2.83 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.30 (m, 2H), 1.83 (m, 2H), 1.70 (m, 4H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.50-1.43 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.36-1.29 (m, 4H), 0.89 (dd, J=9.6, 4.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.36, 173.63, 160.46, 141.55, 141.49, 136.53, 117.71, 108.93, 78.05, 77.77, 51.51, 39.83, 33.59, 31.35, 29.94, 28.04, 25.49, 23.43, 22.42, 21.78, 13.89. [α]D=0.34 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)oxazol-2-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


In a 10 mL conical flask the ketone Ox_12 (0.018 g, 0 0.0457 mmol), RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)] (0.006 g, 0.0036 mmol, 5 mol %) and potassium tert-butoxide (0.008 g, 0.071 mmol) were dissolved in iso-propanol (2 mL). Tri-isopropyl borate (0.01 mL, 0.04 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator at 5 bar for 24 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (3:2 pentane:EtOAc) to give a mixture of Isopropyl and Methyl ester. The mixture was dissolved in dry methanol (5 mL) and stirred at r.t. with CSA (0.018 g, 0.07 mmol) for 3 h. The reaction was concentrated in vacuo at r.t. and the product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (1:10 MeOH:CH2Cl2) as a white wax (0.006 g, 27% over 2 steps). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D20) δ 7.60 (s, 1H), 6.72-6.62 (m, 1H), 6.52-6.34 (m, 1H), 4.60-4.54 (m, 1H), 4.20 (m, 1H), 3.65-3.59 (m, 1H), 3.22 (3.52 (s, 3H), 2.30 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.71-1.64 (m, 2H), 1.57-1.41 (m, 4H), 1.31 (m, 2H), 1.15 (m, 4H), 0.72 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, D20) δ 177.12, 137.81, 128.84, 117.57, 116.92, 74.03, 73.27, 66.10, 52.02, 34.78, 33.34, 30.89, 30.66, 24.11, 21.76, 20.64, 13.14.


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)oxazol-2-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


In a 10 mL conical flask the ketone Ox_12 (0.040 g, 0.102 mmol), RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)] (0.012 g, 0.0072 mmol, 5 mol %) and potassium tert-butoxide (0.016 g, 0.142 mmol) were dissolved in iso-propanol (2 mL). Tri-isopropyl borate (0.01 mL, 0.04 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator at 5 bar for 24 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (3:2 pentane:EtOAc) to give a mixture of Isopropyl and Methyl ester. The mixture was dissolved in dry methanol (5 mL) and stirred at r.t. with CSA (0.020 g, 0.077 mmol) for 3 h. The reaction was concentrated in vacuo at room temperature and the product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (1:10 MeOH:CH2Cl2) as a white wax (0.012 g, 32% over 2 steps)1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ 7.59 (s, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J=16.1, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (d, J=16.1, 1H), 4.65-4.51 (m, 1H), 4.15 (t, J=4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.61-3.55 (m, 1H), 2.33 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.18 (s, 2H), 1.83-1.74 (m, 2H), 1.72-1.50 (m, 2H), 1.46-1.39 (m, 2H), 1.32 (m, 4H), 0.95-0.86 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN) δ 173.76, 138.29, 126.95, 117.09, 116.72, 74.24, 73.58, 66.59, 50.88, 36.17, 33.37, 31.56, 31.43, 24.80, 22.34, 21.13, 13.33.


Compounds Im 6-S-2, Im 6-R-4, Im 6-S-4, Im 6-R-6, Im 6-S-6, of Formula (VImm)
4, 5-Dibromo-1, 2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole (IM 2)



embedded image


To a solution of 1,2-dimethylimidazole (8.71 g, 90.67 mmol) in CHCl3 (300 mL) was added 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin (28.51 g, 99.73 mmol) in one portion. The resulting mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature, following which 100 mL of 2.0 M HCl was added. The resulting mixture was extracted with water (3×100 mL), and the pH of the combined aqueous layers was adjusted to 7.0 using Aq. sat. NaHCO3. The resulting white precipitate was filtered, dissolved in CH2Cl2 and concentrated in vacuo to afford the target dibrominated imidazole Im 2 as a white solid (12.3209 g, 48.5222 mmol 54%). mp=77-80° C. (lit 77-78° C.); IR (vmax)=3054, 2986, 1421 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.53 (s, 3H), 2.40 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.66, 114.54, 102.96, 32.80, 14.19 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C5H7N2Br2 (ES+) 252.8976 found 252.8988 (4.8 ppm).


General Procedure for Lithium-Halogen Exchange on 4, 5-dibromo-1, 2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole



embedded image


Under an atmosphere of N2, 4, 5-dibromo-1, 2-dimethylimidazole (2.00 g, 7.88 mmol) in anhydrous THE (120 mL) was cooled to −78° C. and n-butyllithium solution was added dropwise (2.50 M, 3.15 mL, 7.88 mmol). The reaction was stirred at −78° C. for 10 minutes. The lithiated solution was then transferred dropwise by cannula to a reaction vessel under inert atmosphere containing a solution of the corresponding acid chloride (9.46 mmol) pre-cooled to −78° C. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78° C. for 1 hour, followed by warming to room temperature and stirring for an additional hour. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction and the pH adjusted to 7. The organic layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×20 mL), and the combined organic extracts were washed with water (30 mL) and brine (30 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (4:1 Pent:EtOAc) yielded the target compound.


1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)ethanone (Im 3-2)



embedded image


Compound Im 3-2 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (66%). mp=70-71° C.; vmax=2995, 2957, 2859, 1801, 1741, 1649, 1487 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 188.49, 149.95, 128.64, 123.65, 34.17, 30.61, 13.37. ppm; HRMS calcd. for C7H9BrN2O (ES+) 216.9976 found 216.9975 (−0.7 ppm).


1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)butan-1-one (Im 3-4)



embedded image


Compound Im 3-4 was isolated as a yellow oil (54%). vmax=2963, 2933, 2873, 1751, 1650, 1463, 1430, 1249 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.85 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.59 (dt, J=9.4, 4.7 Hz, 2H), 0.88 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.48, 149.76, 128.43, 122.58, 43.63, 34.17, 17.74, 13.76, 13.36 ppm;


1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)pentan-1-one (Im 3-5)



embedded image


Compound Im 3-5 isolated as a yellow oil (64%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.96 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 1.72-1.55 (m, 2H), 1.43-1.30 (m, 2H), 0.91 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.64, 149.73, 128.44, 122.59, 41.46, 34.15, 26.36, 22.34, 13.86, 13.36 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C10H15BrN2O (ES+) 259.0446 found 259.0444 (−0.8 ppm).


1-(4-Bromo-1, 2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)hexan-1-one (Im 3-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 3-6 isolated as a yellow oil (72%); vma=2956, 2930, 2860, 1752, 1655, 1466, 1252 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.99 (t, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 1.72-1.66 (m, 2H), 1.39-1.34 (m, 4H), 0.93-0.90 (m, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) 191.55, 149.73, 128.39, 122.53, 41.70, 34.15, 31.40, 23.96, 22.46, 13.90, 13.34 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C1H18N2OBr (ES+) 273.0602 found 273.0616 (4.9 ppm).


General Procedure for Asymmetric Reduction of Bromoimidazole Ketone



embedded image


To a solution of imidazole ketone (4 mmol) in iPrOH (3.0 mL) was added KOtBu (4 mmol) and RuCl2[(R)-DM-BINAP][(R)-DAIPEN] (0.08 mmol) or RuCl2[(S)-DM-BINAP][(S)-DAIPEN] (0.08 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator under 15 bar of hydrogen for 16 hours. CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was added and the reaction mixture then washed with aq. sat. NH4Cl (30 mL), water (30 mL) and brine (30 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (3:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded target alcohol as a crystalline solid. Recrystallisation from EtOAc and pentane afforded the enantioenriched target compound.


(R)-1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)ethanol (Im 4-R-2)



embedded image


Compound Im 4-R-2 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (32%,99% ee).


(S)-1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)ethanol (Im 4-S-2)



embedded image


Compound Im 4-S-2 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (33%, 98% ee).


(R)-1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)butan-1-ol (Im 4-R-4)



embedded image


Compound Im 4-R-4 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (63%, >99% ee) mp=162-165° C.; vmax=3178, 2956, 2931, 2868, 1724, 1560, 1403, 1237 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.83 (t, 1H), 3.63 (t, 3H), 2.93 (s, 1H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 1.97-1.85 (m, 1H), 1.80-1.71 (m, 1H), 1.51-1.36 (m, 1H), 1.33-1.18 (m, 1H), 0.93 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.87, 129.43, 112.45, 66.18, 38.04, 31.97, 19.35, 13.95, 13.29 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C9H15BrN2O (ES+) 247.0446 found 247.0435 (−4.5 ppm); [α]D=+20.56 (c=1 in CHCl3)


(S)-1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)butan-1-ol (Im 4-S-4)



embedded image


Compound Im 4-S-4 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (62%, >99% ee) mp=163-165° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.84 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.74 (s, 1H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.96-1.85 (m, 1H), 1.80-1.71 (m, 1H), 1.44-1.38 (m, 1H), 1.31-1.23 (m, 1H), 0.94 (t, J=7.3, 1.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 145.91, 129.38, 112.55, 66.26, 38.04, 31.97, 19.36, 13.95, 13.31 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C9H15BrN2O (ES+) 247.0446 found 247.0458 (+4.9 ppm); [α]D=−17.56 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(R)-1-(4-bromo-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)hexan-1-ol (Im 4-R-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 4-R-6 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (56%, >99% ee)1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.82 (td, J=7.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.74 (d, J=3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.97-1.86 (m, 1H), 1.83-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.47-1.35 (m, 1H), 1.35-1.25 (m, 4H), 1.26-1.16 (m, 1H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.90, 129.39, 112.56, 66.50, 35.89, 31.96, 31.65, 25.77, 22.69, 14.14, 13.32 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C11H19BrN2O (ES+) 275.0759 found 275.0762 (1.1 ppm); [α]D=+15.02 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(S)-1-(4-Bromo-1, 2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)hexan-1-ol (Im 4-S-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 4-S-6 isolated as a colourless crystalline solid (55%, >99% ee) mp=135-137° C.; vmax=3237, 2950, 2858, 1477, 1431, 1404, 1321, 1238, 1062 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.82 (t, J=7.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.77 (s, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.95-1.86 (m, 1H), 1.81-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.45-1.35 (m, 1H), 1.33-1.25 (m, J=3.2 Hz, 4H), 1.25-1.14 (m, 1H), 0.87 (t, J=6.7, 6.1 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.90, 129.40, 112.54, 66.49, 35.90, 31.96, 31.65, 25.77, 22.69, 14.14, 13.31 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C11H19BrN2O (ES+) 275.0759 found 275.0770 (4.0 ppm).


General Procedure for Suzuki Cross-Coupling Between Mono-Brominated Imidazole and Vinylboronic Ester



embedded image


To a solution of brominated imidazole compound (200 mmol) in ethylene glycol dimethyl ether (1.0 mL) was added the vinylboronic ester 61 (240 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium (10 mmol) and K2CO3 (400 mmol as 2 M aqueous solution). The resulting mixture was stirred in a sealed microwave tube at 125° C., 150 W for 45 minutes, after which CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added to the mixture. The solution was washed with water (10 mL) and brine (10 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (1:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded the target imidazole compound.


methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(5-((R)-1-hydroxyethyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (Im 5-R-2)



embedded image


Compound Im 5-R-2 was isolated as a clear yellow oil (52%)1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.53 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (dd, J=15.4, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (q, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.21-4.10 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.36-2.28 (m, 2H), 1.81-1.65 (m, 4H), 1.55 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H) ppm;


methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(5-((S)-1-hydroxyethyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (Im 5-S-2)



embedded image


Compound Im 5-S-2 was isolated as a clear yellow oil (23%)1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.45 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (dd, J=15.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (q, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.19-4.09 (m, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.32-2.24 (m, 2H), 1.81-1.58 (m, 4H), 1.50 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.48 (s, 3H), 1.36 (s, 3H) ppm.


methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(5-((R)-1-hydroxybutyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (Im 5-R-4)



embedded image


Compound Im 5-R-4 was isolated as a clear yellow oil (59%, 99% de)1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.36 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dd, J=15.4, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.60-4.55 (m, 1H), 4.15-4.09 (m, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.57 (s, 3H), 2.33-2.27 (m, 2H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.94-1.83 (m, 1H), 1.82-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.69-1.60 (m, 2H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 1H), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.45-1.41 (m, 1H), 1.42-1.38 (m, 1H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.21-1.19 (m, 1H), 0.89 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.04, 145.97, 133.21, 130.89, 123.42, 122.58, 108.18, 80.13, 78.45, 65.03, 51.56, 38.28, 33.93, 31.79, 30.11, 28.42, 25.88, 21.91, 19.56, 13.98, 12.92 ppm.


methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(5-((S)-1-hydroxybutyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (Im 5-S-4)



embedded image


Compound Im 5-S-4 was isolated as a clear yellow oil (72%, 98% de) vmax=3178.79, 2924.78, 2870.54, 1735.88, 1664.34, 1525.12 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.39 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dd, J=15.4, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.65-4.56 (m, 1H), 4.12 (dt, J=13.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.55 (s, 3H), 2.79 (s, 1H), 2.35-2.27 (m, 2H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.01-1.71 (m, 4H), 1.70-1.52 (m, 4H), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 0.93-0.83 (m, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.91, 145.94, 133.45, 130.44, 122.87, 122.53, 108.02, 79.49, 78.33, 65.15, 51.42, 38.18, 33.78, 31.61, 29.96, 28.20, 25.72, 21.80, 19.37, 13.77, 12.99 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C21H34N2O5 (ES+) 395.2546 found 395.2528 (−4.5 ppm); [α]=−1.96 (c=1 in CHCl3).


methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(5-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (Im 5-R-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 5-R-6 was isolated as a clear yellow oil (57%, 99% de) vmax=3271.35, 2924.79, 2855.82, 1734.71, 1657.35, 1436.39, 1377.37, 1164.80, 1057.20 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.40 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (dd, J=15.4, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.84 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (dt, 1H), 4.18-4.09 (m, 1H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 3.57 (s, 1H), 2.31 (td, J=7.4, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 2.25 (s, 2H), 1.93-1.86 (m, 1H), 1.78 (dd, J=15.3, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 1.66 (dd, J=14.3, 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.59-1.53 (m, 1H), 1.50 (s, 1H), 1.45-1.40 (m, 1H), 1.37 (s, 1H), 1.28-1.25 (m, J=7.6, 4.5 Hz, 4H), 0.87-0.84 (m, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.08, 146.09, 133.64, 130.72, 123.71, 122.51, 108.20, 80.15, 78.48, 65.51, 51.59, 36.18, 33.96, 31.76, 30.16, 29.84, 28.47, 26.03, 25.92, 22.69, 21.95, 14.17, 13.10 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C23H38N2O5 (ES+) 423.2859 found 423.2859 (0.0 ppm); [α]D=+14.96 (c=1 in CHCl3).


methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(5-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (Im 5-S-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 5-S-6 was isolated as a clear yellow oil (64%, 99% de) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.35 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (dd, J=15.4, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.16-4.08 (m, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.53 (s, 3H), 2.28 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 1.94-1.71 (m, 4H), 1.70-1.57 (m, 2H), 1.59-1.49 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.29-1.15 (m, 4H), 0.89-0.78 (m, 3H) ppm; HRMS calcd. for C23H38N2O5 (ES+) 423.2859 found 423.2845 (−3.3 ppm); [α]D=−4.77 (c=1 in CHCl3).


General Procedure for Deprotection of Acetonide-Protected Imidazole LXA4 Analogues

To a solution of acetonide-protected imidazole analogue (85 mmol) in MeOH (0.5 mL) at 0° C. was added ZrCl4 (25.5 mmol) in one portion. The reaction was then allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred until TLC indicated consumption of starting material. The solution was then concentrated in vacuo at room temperature. Purification by preparative thin layer chromatography (10:1 CH2Cl2:MeOH) afforded the desired free-diol.


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(5-((S)-1-hydroxyethyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)oct-7-enoate (Im 6-S-2)



embedded image


Compound Im 6-S-2 was isolated as a dark yellow oil (31%, 98% de)1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.73 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (dd, J=15.9, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (q, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (t, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.61-3.52 (m, 1H), 2.57 (s, 3H), 2.38 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.94-1.83 (m, 1H), 1.73-1.61 (m, 2H), 1.56 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.49-1.42 (m, 1H) ppm; HRMS calcd. for C16H26N2O5 (ES+) 327.1920 found 327.1910 (−3.0 ppm); [α]D=−9.45 (c=1 in MeOH).


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(5-((R)-1-hydroxybutyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)oct-7-enoate (Im 6-R-4)



embedded image


Compound Im 6-R-4 isolated as a dark-coloured oil (44%, 98% de)1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.67 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (dd, J=16.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (t, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.57 (dd, J=8.8, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 2.37 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.95-1.90 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.83 (m, 1H), 1.79-1.73 (m, 1H), 1.69-1.62 (m, 2H), 1.49-1.42 (m, 2H), 1.36-1.23 (m, 1H), 0.96 (dd, J=7.5, 6.7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN) δ 173.81, 145.51, 133.41, 131.22, 125.71, 114.76, 74.72, 73.78, 64.14, 50.94, 37.88, 33.42, 32.60, 31.71, 21.05, 18.62, 12.99, 10.58. [α]D=+19.61 (c=1 in MeOH).


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(5-((S)-1-hydroxybutyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)oct-7-enoate



embedded image


Compound Im 6-S-4 isolated as a dark-coloured oil (25%, 96% de) vmax=3342, 2949, 2929, 2858, 1732, 1435, 1072 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) 6.51 (d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (dd, J=15.6, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.02-3.98 (m, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.55 (s, 3H), 3.53-3.46 (m, 1H), 2.84 (s, 3H), 2.30 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.88-1.81 (m, 1H), 1.78-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.69-1.64 (m, 1H), 1.62-1.55 (m, 1H), 1.52-1.43 (m, 1H), 1.38-1.32 (m, 2H), 1.24-1.18 (m, 1H), 0.90 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN) δ 173.82, 145.50, 132.76, 130.36, 126.76, 121.37, 75.56, 74.00, 64.62, 50.86, 38.41, 33.48, 31.59, 31.20, 21.24, 19.03, 13.11, 12.00 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C18H30N2O5 (ES+) 355.2233 found 355.2219 (−3.9 ppm);


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(5-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)oct-7-enoate (Im 6-R-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 6-R-6 isolated as a yellow oil (20%,99% de) vmax=3348, 2952, 2927, 2857, 1735, 1662, 1522, 1436, 1025 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.43 (d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (dd, J=15.0, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 3.61-3.58 (m, 1H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.29 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.91-1.84 (m, 1H), 1.83-1.73 (m, 1H), 1.71-1.59 (m, 2H), 1.52-1.34 (m, 4H), 1.33-1.19 (m, 4H), 1.18-1.11 (m, 1H), 0.84 (t, J=6.7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.42, 145.88, 132.73, 130.69, 127.01, 121.18, 75.83, 74.40, 65.10, 51.62, 36.16, 33.97, 31.88, 31.74, 29.82, 26.01, 22.69, 21.51, 14.16, 12.69 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C20H34N2O5 (ES+) 383.2546 found 383.2548 (+0.5 ppm); [α]D=+12.47 (c=1 in CHCl3).


(5S,6R,E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(5-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)oct-7-enoate (Im 6-S-6)



embedded image


Compound Im 6-S-6 isolated as a dark yellow oil (41%, 99% de);) vmax=3342, 2929, 2858, 1732, 1522, 1435, 1048 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ 6.50 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (dd, J=15.5, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.02-3.98 (m, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 3.53-3.47 (m, 1H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 2.30 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 1.87-1.81 (m, 1H), 1.79-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.66 (m, 1H), 1.63-1.56 (m, 1H), 1.51-1.46 (m, 1H), 1.39-1.31 (m, 2H), 1.32-1.25 (m, 4H), 1.15 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 0.87 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3CN) δ 173.83, 145.60, 133.15, 130.40, 126.43, 121.71, 75.64, 74.02, 64.89, 50.87, 36.26, 33.49, 31.57, 31.29, 31.15, 25.52, 22.32, 21.27, 13.33, 12.06 ppm; HRMS calcd. for C20H34N2O5 (ES+) 383.2546 found 383.2535 (−2.9 ppm); [α]=−18.91 (c=1 in CHCl3).


Compounds (1S)-9 and (1R)-9 of Formula (VIm2)



embedded image


N-methoxy-N-methyl-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazole-4-carboxamide (19)

The ester (18) (4.45 g, 15.22 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.70 g, 19.78 mmol, 1.30 equiv) were dissolved in THF (45 mL). iPrMgCl (19.8 mL, 2 M in THF, 39.87 mmol, 2.60 equiv) was added dropwise at −18° C. and stirring was continued for 1.5 h. The reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature and Et2O (50 mL) was added followed by H2O (50 mL). The organic layer was washed with H2O (50 mL) and brine (50 mL). The aqueous phase was then re-extracted with Et2O (80 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) afforded the title compound (19) as a light brown solid (4.67 g, 82%). Rf=0.44 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). mp=143-145° C. IR (vmax)=1216, 1439, 1635, 2403, 3017 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=3.55 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 7.23-7.30 (m, 5H), 7.41-7.43 (m, 5H), 7.80 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ=34.8, 61.5, 126.0, 128.0, 128.3, 128.9 (2C), 129.0, 129.8, 135.0, 138.1, 146.6, 163.4, 197.4 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. C18H17N302Na (M+Na)+ 330.1218 found 330.1223 (+1.4 ppm).


1-(1,2-Diphenyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)hexan-1-one (20)

The Grignard derivative of 1-bromopentane was prepared via the addition of bromopentane (0.32 mL, 2.60 mmol, 4.00 equiv) to preactivated magnesium turnings (0.06 g, 2.60 mmol, 4.00 equiv) in THE (10 mL) and heating to reflux for 1.25 h. The Weinreb amide (19) (0.20 g, 0.65 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in THE (5 mL) was transferred dropwise into the flask containing the Grignard reagent and heating was continued for a further 1.5 h. Aq. sat. NH4Cl (20 mL) was added to the reaction mixture which was then extracted with Et2O (20 mL) and washed with H2O (20 mL), then brine (20 mL). The aqueous layer was re-extracted with Et2O (20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was then purified by column chromatography (9:1 Pent:EtOAc) to afford the title compound (20) as an off white solid (0.18 g, 88%). Rf=0.85 (94:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). mp=92-94° C. IR (vmax)=758, 1529, 1669, 3021 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=0.90-0.94 (m, 3H), 1.22-1.45 (m, 6H), 3.08 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.21-7.44 (m, 10H), 7.80 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 5=14.1, 22.7, 24.1, 31.8, 39.1, 125.9, 126.4, 128.5, 129.0, 129.1, 129.2, 129.7, 129.8, 137.9, 141.9, 147.3, 197.4 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H23N20 (M+H)+ 319.1810, found 319.1805.


1-(5-Bromo-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)hexan-1-one (11)

The imidazole (20) (0.71 g, 2.23 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in acetonitrile. NBS (0.87 g, 4.90 mmol, 2.20 equiv) was added and the reaction was stirred at 45° C. for 2.5 h. The reaction was concentrated and purified by flash column chromatography (9:1 Pent:EtOAc) to afford the title compound (10) as a white solid (0.84 g, 94%). Rf=0.88 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). mp=97-98° C. IR (vmax)=1506, 1679, 2932, 3019 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 3=0.92 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.37-1.45 (m, 6H), 3.15 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.16-7.53 (m, 10H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ=14.1, 22.7, 23.8, 31.7, 39.6, 110.6, 128.4, 128.5, 128.6, 129.3, 129.6, 129.8, 129.9, 136.1, 137.6, 148.0, 196.8 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H22N2OBr (M+H)+ 397.0915, found 397.0907.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-hexanoyl-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (23)



embedded image


The imidazole (11) (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (1.5 mL). Pd(PPh3)4 (5.00 mg, 14.9 □mol, 8 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The boronic ester (61) (0.11 g, 0.30 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in 1,4-dioxane (1.5 mL) and K2CO3 (0.08 g, 0.60 mmol, 2.00 equiv) in H2O (0.30 mL) were added and the reaction was stirred under N2 at 90° C. for 16 h. The reaction mixture was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (30 mL), washed with aq. sat. NH4Cl (30 mL), H2O (30 mL) and brine (30 mL). The organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (6:1 to 1:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded the title compound (23) as a white semi-solid (0.14 g, 87%). Rf=0.10 (6:1 Pent:EtOAc). [α]D20=−4.9 (c=1.07 in CHCl3). IR (vmax)=1027, 1216, 1670, 1735, 3404 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=0.92 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.20-1.80 (m, 16H), 2.31 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 4.03-4.08 (m, 1H), 4.47 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.84 (dd, J=16.4, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J=16.4 Hz, 1H), 7.20-7.49 (m, 10H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ=14.2, 21.9, 22.8, 24.1, 25.8, 28.2, 29.9, 31.8, 34.0, 40.1, 51.6, 78.2, 79.9, 108.5, 119.5, 125.8, 128.3, 128.5, 129.0, 129.7, 130.1, 132.2, 134.4, 137.1, 137.9, 147.2, 173.9, 198.9 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C33H40N2O5Na (M+Na)+567.2835 found 567.2825.


(R)-1-(5-Bromo-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)hexan-1-ol ((1R)-25)



embedded image


RuCl2[(S)-(DM-BINAP)][(S)-DAIPEN] (5.00 mg, 4.00 μmol, 2.00 mol %),KOtBu (5.00 mg, 0.03 mmol, 15 mol %) and the bromo-imidazole (11) (0.08 g, 0.20 mmol, 1.00 equiv) were solubilised in iPrOH (6 mL) and 2 drops of tri-isopropyl borate were added. The reaction was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator at 40 bar for 16 h. CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was washed with aq. sat. NH4Cl (40 mL), H2O (40 mL) and brine (40 mL), then dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (6:1 to 4:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded the title compound ((1R)-25) as an off white solid (0.06 g, 69%). [α]D20=−1.9 (c=0.85 in CHCl3). Rf=0.12 (6:1 Pent:EtOAc). mp=107-108° C. IR (vmax)=692, 1464, 1595, 2856, 3235 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=0.90 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.32-2.03 (m, 8H), 2.57 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (dd, J=13.7, 7.4, 1H), 7.20-7.48 (m, 10H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ=14.2, 22.8, 25.5, 31.8, 37.5, 67.9, 102.8, 128.3, 128.4, 128.8, 129.4, 129.6, 130.1, 136.7, 142.4, 147.1 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. C21H24N2OBr (M+H)+ 399.1072 found 399.1059. ee=96% as determined by HPLC using a Chiralpak IC column (heptane/ethanol, 98/2, 1 mL/min), Rt=27.6 min (S)-enantiomer, 31.7 min (R)-enantiomer.


(S)-1-(5-Bromo-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)hexan-1-ol ((1S)-25). RuCl2[(R)-(DM-BINAP)][(R)-DAIPEN] (0.01 g, 0.01 mmol, 5.00 mol %), KOtBu (0.02 g, 0.25 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and bromo-imidazole (10) (0.10 g, 0.25 mmol, 1.00 equiv) were solubilised in iPrOH (6 mL). Tri-isopropyl borate (0.06 mL, 0.25 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was then added. The reaction was stirred in a Parr hydrogenator at 40 bar for 16 h. CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was then washed with aq. sat. NH4Cl (40 mL), H2O (40 mL) and brine (40 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (6:1 to 4:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded the title compound ((1S)-25) as an off white solid (0.07 g, 72%). [α]D20=+2.3 (c=1.00 in CHCl3); ee=89% as determined by HPLC using a Chiralpak IC column (heptane/ethanol, 98/2, 1 mL/min), Rt=26.7 min (S)-enantiomer, 30.8 min (R)-enantiomer; all other physical data were in agreement with a previously prepared sample.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-26)



embedded image


Imidazole ((1R)-25) (0.06 g, 0.15 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (1.4 mL). PdCl2(dppf) (9.00 mg, 12.00 μmol, 8 mol %) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The boronic ester (61) (0.07 g, 0.19 mmol, 1.26 equiv) in 1,4-dioxane (1.4 mL) and K2CO3 (0.06 g, 0.45 mmol, 3.00 equiv) in H2O (0.34 mL) were added and the reaction was stirred under N2 at 80° C. for 16 h. The reaction mixture was solubilised in CH2Cl2 (30 mL), washed with aq. sat. NH4Cl (30 mL), H2O (30 mL) then brine (30 mL). The organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (6:1 to 1:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded the title compound ((1R)-26) as a white semi-solid (35.3 mg, 43%). Rf=0.6 (7:3 EtOAc: Pent). [α]D20=+56.5 (c=1.17 in CHCl3). IR (vmax)=1216, 1731, 2934, 3019 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)=0.90 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.26-2.02 (m, 18H), 2.34 (td, J=7.5, 3.7 Hz, 2H), 2.94 (br. s, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 4.05-4.10 (m, 1H), 4.43 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.80-4.83 (m, 1H), 5.53 (dd, J=16.2, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (d, J=16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.17-7.45 (m, 10H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 3=14.2, 21.9, 22.8, 25.8 (2C), 28.2, 30.1, 31.9, 33.9, 38.2, 51.7, 68.0, 78.2, 80.0, 108.4, 119.8, 126.8, 127.4, 128.2, 128.4, 128.5, 128.6, 129.1, 129.8, 130.2, 137.1, 137.9, 143.4, 146.7, 173.8 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C33H43N2O5 [M+H] 547.3172 found 547.3160.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-26). The imidazole ((1S)-25) (0.06 g, 0.14 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (1.4 mL). PdCl2(dppf) (8.00 mg, 11.20 μmol, 8 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The boronic ester (61) (0.10 g, 0.28 mmol, 2.00 equiv) in 1,4-dioxane (1.4 mL) and K2CO3 (0.06 g, 0.42 mmol, 3.00 equiv) in H2O (0.34 mL) were added and the reaction was stirred under N2 at 80° C. for 16 h. The reaction mixture was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (30 mL), washed with aq. sat. NH4Cl (30 mL), H2O (30 mL), brine (30 mL). The organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (6:1 to 1:1 Pent:EtOAc) afforded the title compound ((1S)-25) as a white semi-solid (61.60 mg, 81%). Rf=0.60 (7:3 EtOAc: Pent). [α]D20=+15.2 (c=0.75 in CHCl3). IR (vmax)=1216, 1731, 2933, 3019 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=0.90 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.24-2.09 (m, 18H), 2.33 (td, J=7.6, 2.7 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (br. d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 4.03-4.11 (m, 1H), 4.44 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.78-4.84 (m, 1H), 5.58 (dd, J=16.1, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.19-7.46 (m, 10H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ=14.2, 21.9, 22.8, 25.8, 25.9, 28.3, 30.0, 31.9, 33.9, 38.0, 51.7, 68.0, 78.2, 79.9, 108.4, 119.6, 127.0, 127.4, 128.2, 128.6, 128.7, 129.2, 129.8, 130.2, 137.3, 143.3, 146.9, 173.8 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C33H42N2O5Na [M+Na]+569.2991 found 569.2997.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-9). Imidazole ((1R)-26) (35.00 mg, 64.00 □mol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in MeOH (1 mL). ZrCl4 (3.00 mg, 64.00 μmol, 0.20 equiv) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. More ZrCl4 (15.00 mg, 0.06 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for a further 3 h. ZrCl4 (15.00 mg, 0.06 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and MeOH (1 mL) were added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for a further 3 h. Purification by flash column chromatography (1:1 Pent:EtOAc to 96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) followed by preparative TLC (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) afforded the title compound ((1R)-9) as an off white semi-solid (10.6 mg, 32%). Rf=0.2 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). [α]D20=+10.9 (c=0.92 in CHCl3). IR (vmax)=896, 1156, 1606, 1733, 2988, 3096 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=0.90 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.26-2.15 (m, 14H), 2.33 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.86 (br. s, 1H), 3.58-3.62 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 4.04-4.07 (m, 1H), 4.79-4.4.83 (m, 1H), 5.65 (dd, J=16.3, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (d, J=16.3 Hz, 1H), 7.10-7.32 (m, 7H), 7.44-7.46 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ=14.2, 21.2, 22.8, 25.9, 31.5, 31.9, 33.8, 37.9, 51.8, 68.0, 74.0, 76.0, 119.2, 127.4, 128.3, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7, 129.2, 129.8, 130.0, 130.3, 137.1, 142.8, 146.7, 174.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C30H39N2O5 [M+H]+ 507.2859, found 507.2860.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)-1,2-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-9). The imidazole ((1S)-26) (0.06 g, 0.10 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in MeOH (2 mL). ZrCl4 (0.04 g, 0.16 mmol, 1.50 equiv) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. ZrCl4 (0.04 g, 0.16 mmol, 1.50 equiv) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for a further 3 h. Purification by flash column chromatography (1:1 Pent:EtOAc to 96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) followed by preparative (TLC 96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) afforded the title compound ((1S)-9) as an off white semi-solid (20.3 mg, 40%). Rf=0.2 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). [α]D20=+3.6 (c=0.82 in CHCl3). IR (vmax)=1156, 1606, 1733, 2988, 3090 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=0.89 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.26-2.04 (m, 12H), 2.31 (td, J=7.4, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (br. s, 3H), 3.58 (dd, J=8.4, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 4.03 (dd, J=5.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (dd, J=7.8, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (dd, J=16.3, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (d, J=16.3 Hz, 1H), 7.16-7.30 (m, 7H), 7.40-7.44 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 5=14.2, 21.2, 22.8, 25.9, 31.6, 31.9, 33.9, 37.7, 51.7, 68.0, 73.9, 75.9, 119.1, 127.5, 128.3, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7, 129.2, 129.8, 130.0, 130.4, 137.1, 142.6, 146.6, 174.2 ppm. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C30H39N2O5 (M+H)+ 507.2859, found 507.2859.


Compounds (1S)-13 and (1R)-13 of Formula (VIo) and Compounds (1S)-14 and (1R)-14 of Formula (VIo2)
1-(3-Bromofuran-2-yl)hexan-1-one (16)



embedded image


Aluminium trichloride (1.36 g, 10.21 mmol, 3 eq) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) and cooled to 0° C. Hexanoyl chloride (1.50 mL, 10.89 mmol, 3.2 eq) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added over 5 min and stirred at 0° C. for 30 min. 3-Bromofuran (500 mg, 3.40 mmol, 1 eq) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added over 5 min and reaction mixture was stirred while warming to room temperature for 30 min. The reaction mixture was poured into ice water (50 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×50 mL), the extracts washed with sat. NaHCO3 sol. (50 mL), H2O (50 mL), brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (20:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to give product 16 as a yellow oil (689 mg, 83%). Rf=0.53 (20:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.92-2.85 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.75-1.67 (m, 2H), 1.39-1.31 (m, 4H), 0.94-0.87 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 189.7, 148.4, 145.2, 117.5, 106.8, 39.6, 31.6, 23.6, 22.6, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 1677, 1474, 1379; [M+H]+ calc 245.0177 for C10H14O279Br, found 245.0189.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-hexanoylfuran-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (15)



embedded image


Method A: Bromide 16 (50 mg, 0.204 mmol, 1 eq) and boronic ester 61 (108 mg, 0.306 mmol, 1.5 eq) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (3.5 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (20 mg, 0.0245 mmol, 0.12 eq) was added followed by CsF (146 mg, 0.959 mmol, 4.7 eq). The mixture was heated to 85° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 24 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool, concentrated and was purified by silica gel column chromatography (8:1→3:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to afford 15 as a pale yellow oil (67 mg, 84%). Rf=0.12 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37 (d, J=2.0, 1H), 7.33 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J=2.0, 1H), 6.12 (dd, J=16.0, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (dd, J=8.5, 6.5, 1H), 4.17 (ddd, J=9.0, 6.5, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.85-2.79 (m, 2H), 2.32 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.84-1.75 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.63 (m, 3H), 1.50 (s, 3H), 1.49-1.37 (m, 2H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.35-1.30 (m, 4H), 0.92-0.85 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.2, 173.8, 147.6, 144.5, 131.2, 129.5, 124.2, 110.3, 108.6, 79.4, 78.4, 51.6, 39.4, 33.8, 31.6, 30.0, 28.4, 25.7, 23.7, 22.6, 21.9, 14.0; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 2933, 1736, 1670, 1245, 122, 1161; [α]D=−42.60 (c=0.66 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 415.2097 for C22H32O6Na, found 415.2104.


Method B: Bis(benzonitrile)Pd(II)chloride (12 mg, 0.0306 mmol, 0.15 eq) and dppb (22 mg, 0.0510 mmol, 0.25 eq) were dissolved in toluene (1 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a creamy orange solution. Bromide 16 (50 mg, 0.204 mmol, 1 eq) and boronic ester 61 (83 mg, 0.235 mmol, 1.15 eq) dissolved in toluene (2 mL), were added followed by EtOH (0.06 mL) and Na2CO3 (0.24 mL of a 1 M aq. solution, 0.235 mmol, 1.15 eq). The reaction mixture was heated to 110° C. and stirred for 19 h after which time it was diluted with H2O (30 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL). The extracts were washed with brine (30 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude reaction mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (8:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc) to afford 15 as pale yellow oil (63 mg, 79%).


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-8-(2-hexanoylfuran-3-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate (21)



embedded image


Acetonide 15 (50 mg, 0.127 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (2 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (59 mg, 0.255 mmol, 2 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to yield 21 as a white solid (43 mg, 95%). Rf=0.12 (2:1 pentane:EtOAc); M.p.=82-86° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.26 (dd, J=6.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.81-3.74 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.81 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.33 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.88-1.79 (m, 1H), 1.71-1.64 (m, 3H), 1.51-1.42 (m, 2H), 1.36-1.28 (m, 4H), 0.88 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.3, 174.1, 147.4, 144.5, 133.0, 129.6, 123.4, 110.2, 75.7, 73.8, 51.5, 39.3, 33.7, 31.5, 31.5, 23.5, 22.4, 21.1, 13.9; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3237, 1738, 1663, 1235, 1152, 1120; [α]D=−2.83 (c=0.8 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 375.1784 for C9H28O6Na, found 375.1767.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)furan-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-13)



embedded image


Ketone 21 (80.0 mg, 0.227 mmol, 1 eq) was added to a Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (7.2 mg, 0.0113 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.037 mL, 0.976 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.075 mL, 0.568 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.6 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 72 h, after which time it was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (15 mL), brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give (1S)-13 as a yellow oil (20 mg, 24%). Rf=0.12 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J=7.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.76-3.71 (m, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.42-2.31 (m, 4H), 1.89-1.68 (m, 4H), 1.52-1.43 (m, 2H), 1.39-1.34 (m, 1H), 1.32-1.25 (m, 5H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 153.1, 142.1, 126.7, 122.8, 119.6, 108.2, 76.0, 73.9, 66.2, 51.8, 35.6, 33.9, 31.7, 31.7, 25.5, 22.7, 21.1, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3393, 3020, 2953, 1730, 1661, 1215, 1055; [α]D=−9.15 (c=0.8 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 377.1940 for C9H30O6Na, found 377.1952; de=94% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.190 min (1S)-epimer, 1.424 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)furan-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-13)



embedded image


Ketone 21 (80.0 mg, 0.227 mmol, 1 eq) was added to a Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (7.2 mg, 0.0113 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.037 mL, 0.976 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.075 mL, 0.568 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.6 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 96 h, after which time it was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (15 mL), brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give (1R)-13 was isolated as a yellow oil (25 mg, 31%). Rf=0.12 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (dd, J=7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.77-3.71 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.35 (td, J=7.0, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 1.91-1.82 (m, 3H), 1.73-1.70 (m, 1H), 1.51-1.48 (m, 1H), 1.33-1.27 (m, 7H), 0.87 (t, J=6.2 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.4, 153.0, 142.0, 126.9, 122.7, 119.7, 108.3, 75.9, 73.9, 66.2, 51.8, 35.6, 33.9, 31.7, 31.6, 25.4, 22.7, 21.2, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3393, 3020, 2953, 1730, 1661, 1215, 1055; [α]D=+11.60 (c=0.7 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 377.1940 for C19H30O6Na, found 377.1943; de=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.190 min (1S)-epimer, 1.424 min (1R)-epimer.


1-(3-Bromobenzofuran-2-yl)hexan-1-one (23)



embedded image


Aluminium trichloride (1.02 g, 7.614 mmol, 3 eq) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) and cooled to 0° C. Hexanoyl chloride (1.14 mL, 8.12 mmol, 3.2 eq) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added over 5 min and stirred at 0° C. for 30 min. 3-Bromobenzofuran 22 (500 mg, 2.54 mmol, 1 eq) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added over 5 min and the reaction mixture was stirred while warming to room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was poured into ice water (50 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×50 mL), the extracts washed with sat. NaHCO3 sol. (50 mL), H2O (50 mL), brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (20:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to yield 23 as a yellow solid (627 mg, 75%). Rf=0.76 (20:1 pentane:EtOAc); m.p.=55-58° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70-7.64 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.51 (m, 2H), 7.38 (ddd, J=8.0, 6.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.83-1.74 (m, 2H), 1.43-1.36 (m, 4H), 0.95-0.90 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.6, 153.7, 147.7, 129.3, 128.5, 124.5, 122.1, 112.6, 103.8, 40.3, 31.6, 23.5, 22.6, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 2952, 1670, 1370; HRMS (ESI) [M]+ calc 295.0334 for C14H16O279Br, found 295.0344.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-hexanoylbenzofuran-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (24)



embedded image


Bromide 23 (125 mg, 0.423 mmol, 1 eq) and boronic ester 61 (180 mg, 0.508 mmol, 1.2 eq) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (9 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (41.5 mg, 0.051 mmol, 0.12 eq) was added followed by CsF (302 mg, 1.988 mmol, 4.7 eq). The mixture was heated to 85° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 16 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool, diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (20 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL). Combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (8:1→4:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to afford 24 as pale yellow oil (120 mg, 64%). Rf=0.29 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56-7.45 (m, 3H), 7.38-7.33 (m, 1H), 6.54 (dd, J=16.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.80-4.73 (m, 1H), 4.25 (ddd, J=9.5, 6.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.00 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.90-1.82 (m, 1H), 1.77-1.69 (m, 3H), 1.62-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.56 (s, 3H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.40-1.35 (m, 4H), 0.91 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.2, 173.8, 154.3, 147.8, 132.6, 128.2, 126.3, 124.4, 124.1, 123.0, 123.0, 112.6, 108.7, 80.1, 78.4, 51.6, 40.2, 33.9, 31.6, 30.2, 28.5, 25.8, 23.5, 22.6, 21.9, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 2932, 1736, 1676, 1249, 1160; [α]D=−9.51 (c=1 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 465.2253 for C26H34O6Na, found 465.2260


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-8-(2-hexanoylbenzofuran-3-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate (25)



embedded image


Acetonide 24 (70.0 mg, 0.158 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (3 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (73.5 mg, 0.316 mmol, 2 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give 25 as a yellow oil (60 mg, 94%). Rf=0.17 (2:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.57-7.47 (m, 3H), 7.38-7.32 (m, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J=16.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (dd, J=7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.87-3.80 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.00 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (td, J=7.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 1.89 (m, 1H), 1.78-1.73 (m, 2H), 1.62-1.50 (m, 3H), 1.40-1.37 (m, 4H), 0.92 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.4, 174.3, 154.4, 147.7, 134.4, 128.3, 126.3, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 123.2, 112.5, 76.4, 73.9, 51.7, 40.2, 33.9, 31.8, 31.6, 23.5, 22.7, 21.3, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3450, 2932, 1734, 1673, 1215, 1053; [α]D=−3.80 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 425.1940 for C23H30O6Na, found 425.1922.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)benzofuran-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-14)



embedded image


Ketone 25 (70.0 mg, 0.174 mmol, 1 eq) was added to a Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (5.5 mg, 0.0087 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.028 mL, 0.748 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.057 mL, 0.435 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 64 h, then diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (15 mL), brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to yield (1S)-14 as a yellow oil (49 mg, 70%). Rf=0.21 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33-7.23 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.26 (dd, J=7.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dt, J=8.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.03 (br. s, 1H), 2.81 (br. s, 2H), 2.36-2.25 (m, 2H), 2.02-1.91 (m, 2H), 1.82-1.76 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.65 (m, 1H), 1.55-1.44 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.36 (m, 1H), 1.30-1.22 (m, 5H), 0.85 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.6, 156.2, 154.3, 128.6, 126.8, 124.8, 123.2, 122.6, 121.0, 114.2, 111.6, 76.4, 74.0, 66.6, 51.8, 35.6, 33.8, 31.8, 31.7, 25.4, 22.7, 21.1, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3408, 2954, 1730, 1264, 1079); [α]D=+2.05 (c=1.05 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na] calc 427.2097 for C23H32O6Na, found 427.2090; de=92% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.584 min (1S)-epimer, 2.369 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)benzofuran-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-14)



embedded image


Ketone 25 (50.0 mg, 0.124 mmol, 1 eq) was added to a Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (3.9 mg, 0.0062 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.020 mL, 0.533 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.04 mL, 0.310 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 64 h, then diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (15 mL), brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to yield (1R)-14 as a yellow oil (28 mg, 56%). Rf=0.21 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.31-7.22 (m, 2H), 6.79 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.35 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.29-4.20 (m, 1H), 3.81-3.72 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.20-2.66 (m, 3H), 2.31 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.99-1.91 (m, 2H), 1.84-1.78 (m, 1H), 1.71-1.62 (m, 1H), 1.52-1.43 (m, 2H), 1.40-1.35 (m, 1H), 1.31-1.18 (m, 5H), 0.85 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 156.2, 154.3, 128.6, 126.8, 124.8, 123.2, 122.7, 121.1, 114.3, 111.6, 76.3, 74.0, 66.5, 51.8, 35.5, 33.8, 31.7, 31.7, 25.4, 22.7, 21.2, 14.1; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3408, 2954, 1730, 1264, 1079; [α]D=+6.44 (c=0.9 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 427.2097 for C23H32O6Na, found 427.2115; de=93% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3m L/min), Rt=1.584 min (1S)-epimer, 2.369 min (1R)-epimer.


Compounds (1S)-13 and (1R)-13 of Formula (VIg2), Compounds (1R)-14 and (1S)-14 of Formula (VIq) and Compounds (1S)-34, (1R)-34, (1S)-35 and (1R)-35 of Formula (VIqq)
1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)hexan-1-one (16)



embedded image


Bromobenzothiophene 18 (0.33 mL, 2.523 mmol, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (8 mL). Hexanoyl chloride 20 (0.46 mL, 3.280 mmol, 1.3 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath. AlCl3 (505 mg, 3.784 mmol, 1.5 eq) was added slowly and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h while warming to room temperature. The mixture was poured onto ice water (50 mL), extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×30 mL), and the extracts washed with 5% NaOH solution (25 mL), H2O (25 mL) and brine (30 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated to give a crude mixture which was purified by silica gel column chromatography (neat pentane->50:1 pentane:EtOAc). Product 16 was isolated as a yellow solid (785 mg, 100%). Rf=0.29 (100:1 pentane:EtOAc); M.p.=53-57° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.97-7.89 (m, 1H), 7.81-7.74 (m, 1H), 7.51-7.41 (m, 2H), 3.12 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.81-1.73 (m, 2H), 1.43-1.32 (m, 4H), 0.91 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.3, 139.1, 139.1, 138.4, 128.2, 125.6, 125.6, 122.7, 111.3, 42.5, 31.4, 23.8, 22.5, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3055, 1658, 1492, 1422, 1266; HRMS (ESI) [M+H]+ calc 311.0105 for C14H16OS79Br, found 311.0111.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-hexanoylbenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (15)



embedded image


Bromide 16 (56 mg, 0.180 mmol, 1.00 eq) and boronic ester 61 (68 mg, 0.193 mmol, 1.07 eq) were dissolved in THE (3 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (6.6 mg, 0.00805 mmol, 0.05 eq) was added followed by K3PO4 (0.32 mL of 3 M aq. sol, 0.966 mmol, 6.00 eq). The mixture was heated to 60° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 30 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool, diluted with EtOAc (20 mL) and washed with sat. NH4Cl sol. (20 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL). Combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (20:1→6:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give 15 as pale yellow oil (59 mg, 71%). Rf=0.59 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 5=8.03 (d, J=8.0, 1H), 7.84 (d, J=8.0, 1H), 7.53-7.37 (m, 2H), 7.28 (d, J=16.5, 1H), 6.14 (ddd, J=16.5, 8.0, 1.0, 1H), 4.87-4.76 (m, 1H), 4.28 (dt, J=8.5, 5.5, 1H), 3.63 (d, J=1.0, 3H), 2.92 (t, J=7.5, 2H), 2.36 (t, J=7.5, 2H), 1.86 (ddd, J=16.5, 13.5, 7.0, 1H), 1.80-1.70 (m, 3H), 1.64-1.57 (m, 2H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.40-1.33 (m, 4H), 0.91 (dd, J=7.0, 6.0, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.4, 173.7, 140.3, 138.5, 137.8, 136.4, 132.7, 127.4, 127.0, 125.3, 125.1, 122.8, 108.6, 79.7, 78.2, 51.5, 42.7, 33.8, 31.4, 30.2, 28.3, 25.7, 24.1, 22.5, 21.8, 13.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2955, 2254, 1737, 1659, 1217; [α]D=−1.77 (c=1.0 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 481.2025 for C26H34O5NaS, found 481.2013.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-23)



embedded image


Ketone 15 (100 mg, 0.218 mmol, 1.0 eq) was added to a Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (9.0 mg, 0.014 mmol, 0.06 eq), HCO2H (0.035 mL, 0.937 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.076 mL, 0.545 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.8 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 27° C. and stirred for 46 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with H2O (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with sat. NaHCO3 sol. (15 mL), H2O (15 mL), and brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc) to afford ((1S)-23) as a yellow oil (59.0 mg, 59%). Rf=0.27 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ=7.88-7.75 (m, 2H), 7.35 (m, 2H), 6.83-6.76 (dd, J=16.0, 1.0, 1H) 6.09 (dd, J=16.0, 8.0, 1H), 5.23-5.15 (m, 1H), 4.76-4.70 (m, 1H), 4.29-4.21 (m, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 2.52 (s, 1H), 2.43-2.27 (m, 2H), 2.01-1.91 (m, 1H), 1.91-1.55 (m, 6H), 1.54 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.39-1.26 (m, 5H), 0.88 (t, J=7.0, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 146.5, 138.7, 138.4, 130.5, 128.9, 124.9, 124.5, 124.3, 122.6, 122.5, 108.5, 79.8, 78.1, 68.7, 51.6, 39.1, 33.8, 31.6, 30.1, 28.3, 25.7, 25.6, 22.5, 21.7, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2986, 1731, 1265, 1168; [α]D=+6.9 (c=1.3 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 483.2181 for C26H36O5NaS, found 483.2202; de=88% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.156 min (1S)-epimer, 3.286 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-23)



embedded image


Ketone 15 (70.0 mg, 0.152 mmol, 1.0 eq) was added to a Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (5.0 mg, 0.0076 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.025 mL, 0.654 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.05 mL, 0.380 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.8 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 27° C. and stirred for 65 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with H2O (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with sat. NaHCO3 sol. (15 mL), H2O (15 mL), and brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc). Product ((1R)-23) was isolated as a yellow oil (39.0 mg, 56%). Rf=0.27 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ=7.80 (d, J=9.1, 2H), 7.34 (ddd, J=16.0, 15.0, 7.0, 2H), 6.79 (dd, J=16.0, 0.5, 1H), 6.06 (dd, J=16.0, 8.0, 1H), 5.19 (dd, J=13.5, 7.0, 1H), 4.73 (t, J=7.0, 1H), 4.27-4.21 (m, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 2.57 (br. s, 1H), 2.42-2.30 (m, 2H), 2.00-1.89 (m, 1H), 2.03-1.58 (m, 6H), 1.54 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.36-1.25 (m, 5H), 0.88 (t, J=7.0, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.9, 146.5, 138.7, 138.4, 130.5, 128.9, 124.9, 124.5, 124.3, 122.6, 122.5, 108.5, 79.8, 78.1, 68.7, 51.6, 39.1, 33.8, 31.6, 30.1, 28.3, 25.7, 25.6, 22.5, 21.7, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2986, 1731, 1265, 1168; [α]D=+28.8 (c=1.0 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 483.2181 for C6H36O5NaS, found 483.2202; de=92% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.156 min (1S)-epimer, 3.286 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-8-(2-hexanoylbenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate (27)



embedded image


Acetonide 15 (108 mg, 0.235 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (2 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (11 mg, 0.047 mmol, 0.2 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2 4 96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford 27 as an off-white solid (74 mg, 76%). Rf=0.31 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87-7.76 (m, 2H), 7.40-7.29 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.36-4.26 (m, 1H), 3.85-3.75 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.80-2.47 (m, 3H), 2.36 (td, J=7.0, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 2.02-1.46 (m, 8H), 1.34-1.26 (m, 5H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 146.1, 138.7, 138.4, 132.0, 129.2, 124.6, 124.5, 124.4, 122.6, 122.5, 76.1, 73.9, 68.6, 51.6, 39.0, 33.6, 31.6, 31.6, 25.6, 22.5, 21.0, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3468, 2957, 1730, 1664, 1184, 1077; [α]D=+2.08 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 441.1712 for C23H30O5SNa, found 441.1693.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-13)



embedded image


Ketone 27 (60.0 mg, 0.143 mmol, 1.0 eq) was added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (4.6 mg, 0.0072 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.023 mL, 0.615 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.05 mL, 0.358 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.75 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 46 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (4×10 mL), sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL), and brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2 4 96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). Product ((1S)-13) was isolated as a yellow oil (40 mg, 67%). Rf=0.43 (98:2 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83-7.74 (m, 2H), 7.39-7.28 (m, 2H), 6.80 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (dd, J=6.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.80-3.72 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.22-2.76 (m, 3H), 2.32 (td, J=7.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 1.96-1.44 (m, 7H), 1.31-1.25 (m, 5H), 0.86 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 146.1, 138.9, 138.5, 132.3, 129.5, 124.7, 124.5, 122.8, 122.7, 76.2, 74.1, 68.7, 51.8, 39.1, 33.8, 31.8, 31.8, 25.8, 22.7, 21.2, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3433, 3020, 1729, 1216, 1046; [α]D=+0.80 (c=1. in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na] calc 443.1868 for C23H32O5SNa, found 443.1858; de=86% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.156 min (1S)-epimer, 3.286 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-13)



embedded image


Ketone 27 (60.0 mg, 0.143 mmol, 1.0 eq) was added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (4.6 mg, 0.0072 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.023 mL, 0.615 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.05 mL, 0.358 mmol, 2.5 eq) and DMF (0.75 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 64 h, after which time it was diluted with H2O (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (4×10 mL), sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL), and brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2-96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). Product ((1R)-13) was isolated as a yellow oil (40 mg, 67%). Rf=0.43 (98:2 CH2Cl2:MeOH); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87-7.76 (m, 2H), 7.40-7.29 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.36-4.26 (m, 1H), 3.85-3.75 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.80-2.47 (m, 3H), 2.36 (td, J=7.0, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 2.02-1.46 (m, 7H), 1.34-1.26 (m, 5H), 0.87 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 146.1, 138.7, 138.4, 132.0, 129.2, 124.6, 124.5, 124.4, 122.6, 122.5, 76.1, 73.9, 68.6, 51.6, 39.0, 33.6, 31.6, 31.6, 25.6, 22.5, 21.0, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3433, 3020, 1729, 1216, 1046; [α]D=+6.21 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 443.1868 for C23H32O5SNa, found 443.1856; de=92% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.156 min (1S)-epimer, 3.286 min (1R)-epimer.


1-(3-Bromothiophen-2-yl)hexan-1-ol (29)



embedded image


Diisopropylamine (1.54 mL, 10.9 mmol, 1.0 eq) was added to THE (30 mL) and cooled to O0° C. nBuLi (1.4 mL of 2.5 M sol., 10.96 mmol, 1.01 eq) was added dropwise and stirred for 10 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78° C. 3-Bromothiophene 28 (1.04 mL, 10.90 mmol, 1 eq) was added dropwise to the mixture and stirred at −78° C. for 30 min. Hexanal (1.44 mL, 12.1 mmol, 1.1 eq) was added dropwise and stirred at −78° C. for 1 h. The reaction was quenched by the addition of sat. NH4Cl sol. (50 mL), extracted with Et2O (3×50 mL), washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated to give a crude mixture which was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EtOAc 12:1) to afford 29 as a colourless oil (2.15 g, 75%). Spectral data were consistent with literature;23 Rf=0.46 (20:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.23 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (m, 1H), 2.22 (s, 1H), 1.83 (m, 2H), 1.17-1.57 (m, 6H), 0.89 (m, 3H).


1-(3-Bromothiophen-2-yl)hexan-1-one (30)23



embedded image


Acetic acid (0.5 mL) was added to a solution of pyridinium chlorochromate (2.23 g, 10.6 mmol, 1.5 eq) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and stirred for 5 min. Alcohol 29 (1.85 g, 7.0 mmol, 1 eq) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and stirred at room temperature for 5 h. The mixture was filtered through a pad of celite, eluted with Et2O (100 mL) and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EtOAc 15:1). The product 30 was isolated as a colourless oil (1.58 g, 85%). Spectral data were consistent with literature;23 Rf=0.69 (9:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 1.38 (m, 4H), 0.90 (m, 3H).


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-hexanoylthiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (31)



embedded image


Bromide 30 (96.1 mg, 0.368 mmol, 1.00 eq) and boronic ester 61 (147.0 mg, 0.415 mmol, 1.13 eq) were dissolved in THE (3.8 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (15.0 mg, 0.0184 mmol, 0.05 eq) was added followed by K3PO4 (0.77 mL of 3 M aq. sol, 2.298 mmol, 6.25 eq). The mixture was heated to 60° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 50 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool, quenched with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL). Combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (8:1→6:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give 31 as a pale yellow oil (140 mg, 93%). Rf=0.56 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41-7.35 (m, 1H), 7.33 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (dd, J=16.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.75-4.66 (m, 1H), 4.20 (ddd, J=9.0, 6.1, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.82 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.33 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.85-1.66 (m, 4H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.51-1.42 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.37-1.30 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.2, 173.9, 143.3, 135.8, 130.6, 129.4, 127.8, 127.7, 108.6, 79.6, 78.5, 51.6, 42.5, 33.9, 31.5, 30.1, 28.4, 25.8, 24.5, 22.6, 21.9, 14.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3019, 1732, 1662, 1416, 1215; [α]D=−31.22 (c=0.95 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 431.1855 for C22H32O5SNa, found 431.1868.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-8-(2-hexanoylthiophen-3-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate (32)



embedded image


Acetonide 31 (112.0 mg, 0.274 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (2 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (25.0 mg, 0.110 mmol, 0.4 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2→96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). The product 32 was isolated as an off-white solid (85.0 mg, 84%). Rf=0.16 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); M.p.=54-57° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (d, J=16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (dd, J=5.2, 0.4 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (dd, J=16.2, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.31-4.25 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.75 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.82 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.50-2.38 (m, 2H), 2.35 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.87-1.69 (m, 4H), 1.50-1.32 (m, 6H), 0.90 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.5, 174.3, 143.6, 135.6, 132.3, 129.6, 127.8, 127.3, 76.0, 74.0, 51.7, 42.5, 33.9, 31.7, 31.5, 24.5, 22.6, 21.3, 14.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3468, 1730, 1655, 1414, 1178, 1093; [α]D=+1.90 (c=1.5 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 391.1556 for C19H28O5SNa, found 391.1555.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate (14)



embedded image


Ketone 32 (65.0 mg, 0.176 mmol, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (2.2 mL) and NaBH4 (20.0 mg, 0.529 mmol, 3.0 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, then diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (20 mL), brine (20 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2-96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH). Product (1R)-14 was isolated as a yellow oil (7.0 mg, 16%) and (1S)-14 was isolated as a yellow oil (7.0 mg, 16%). (1R)-14; Rf=0.36 (98:2 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.17 (d, J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (dd, J=15.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J=6.5, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.77-3.69 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.70-2.38 (m, 3H), 2.34 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.90-1.68 (m, 4H), 1.52-1.42 (m, 3H), 1.35-1.28 (m, 5H), 0.88 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) b 174.4, 145.0, 134.9, 127.7, 125.6, 125.3, 124.1, 76.0, 74.0, 68.1, 51.8, 39.3, 33.8, 31.7, 31.7, 25.8, 22.7, 21.2, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3369, 3054, 1733, 1422, 1265, 1157; [α]D=+15.23 (c=0.7 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 393.1712 for C19H30O5SNa, found 393.1710; de=97% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.470 min (1S)-epimer, 1.880 min (1R)-epimer. (1S)-14: Rf=0.40 (98:2 CH2Cl2: MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.16 (d, J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.08 (dd, J=15.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.27-4.17 (m, 1H), 3.75-3.69 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.69-2.45 (m, 3H), 2.39-2.27 (m, 2H), 1.92-1.67 (m, 4H), 1.56-1.40 (m, 3H), 1.35-1.26 (m, 5H), 0.87 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.4, 145.1, 134.8, 127.6, 125.6, 125.4, 124.1, 76.1, 73.9, 68.0, 51.8, 39.3, 33.8, 31.7, 31.7, 25.8, 22.7, 21.1, 14.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3369, 3054, 1733, 1422, 1265, 1157; [α]D=−11.43 (c=0.7 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 393.1712 for C19H30O5SNa, found 393.1702; de=95% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.470 min (1S)-epimer, 1.880 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R-)14)



embedded image


Ketone 32 (58.0 mg, 0.138 mmol, 1.0 eq) was added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (5.0 mg, 0.0079 mmol, 0.057 eq), HCO2H (0.026 mL, 0.677 mmol, 4.9 eq), Et3N (0.052 mL, 0.393 mmol, 2.8 eq) and DMF (0.8 mL). Reaction was stirred at room temperature for 62 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (4×10 mL), sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL), and brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2-96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford (1R)-14 as a yellow oil (14 mg, 24%). de=99% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min. then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.470 min (1S)-epimer, 1.880 min (1R)-epimer. Identical in all other physical data to the previously prepared (1R)-14.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S-)14)



embedded image


Ketone 32 (30.0 mg, 0.143 mmol, 1 eq) was added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (5.0 mg, 0.0079 mmol, 0.055 eq), HCO2H (0.026 mL, 0.677 mmol, 4.7 eq), Et3N (0.052 mL, 0.393 mmol, 2.7 eq) and DMF (0.8 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 110 h, then diluted with H2O (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (4×10 mL), sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL), and brine (15 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (98:2-96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford (1S)-14 as a yellow oil (14.0 mg, 23%). de=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:20:20 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.470 min (1S)-epimer, 1.880 min (1R)-epimer. Identical in all other physical data to the previously prepared (1S)-14.


3-Phenoxypropane-1,2-diol (45)30



embedded image


Phenol 42 (5.0 g, 53.52 mmol, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in EtOH (30 mL) and a solution of NaOH (2.68 g, 66.90 mmol, 1.25 eq) in H2O (10 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 10 min. Then, a solution of 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol 44 (5.4 mL, 64.23 mmol, 1.25 eq) in EtOH (5 mL) was slowly added and the mixture was further heated under reflux for 16 h. EtOH was then removed and Et2O (30 mL) was added, along with water (30 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (2×30 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by recrystallisation from 1:1 cyclohexane:Et2O mixture and the product 45 was isolated as a white solid (7.5 g, 83%). Spectral data were consistent with literature. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (dd, J=8.5, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (tt, J=7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J=8.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 4.15-4.10 (m, 1H), 4.05 (dd, J=5.5, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (ddd, J=11.5, 6.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (dt, J=11.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (d, J=4.5 Hz, 1H).


2-Phenoxyacetaldehyde (46)



embedded image


NaIO4 (25.5 mL of a 0.65 M aq. solution, 16.62 mmol, 1.30 eq) was added to a vigorously stirred suspension of silica gel (25.0 g) in CH2Cl2 (180 mL). A solution of the diol 45 (2.15 g, 12.78 mmol, 1.0 eq) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was then added and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was filtered over a small plug of silica (washing with CH2Cl2) and concentrated to yield the product 46 as a pale yellow oil (1.67 g, 96%). Spectral data were consistent with literature.30 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.86 (t, J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.35-7.29 (m, 2H), 7.05-7.01 (m, 1H), 6.93-6.89 (m, 2H), 4.57 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 2H).


1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-2-phenoxyethan-1-ol (47)



embedded image


nBuLi (1.13 ml of a 2.5 M sol. in hexanes, 2.82 mmol, 1 eq) was added to THE (3 mL) and cooled to −60° C. TMP (0.52 mL, 3.05 mmol, 1.3 eq) was added and warmed to 0° C. for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to −90° C. and 3-bromobenzothiophene 18 (500 mg, 2.35 mmol, 1 eq) dissolved in THE (2 mL) was added dropwise and stirred for 20 min. Phenoxyacetaldehyde 46 (415 mg, 3.05 mmol, 1.3 eq) dissolved in THE (2 mL) was added at −90° C. and stirred for 1.5 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of HCl (3 mL of 5 M aq. sol.) and warmed to room temperature. Sat. NaHCO3 sol. (c. 15 mL) was added to neutralise the reaction mixture and it was extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL), washed with brine (5 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (cyclohexane:EtOAc 94:6-90:10) and product 47 was isolated as a pale pink oil (500 mg, 61%). Rf=0.85 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83 (dd, J=7.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.37-7.29 (m, 2H), 7.06-6.97 (m, 3H), 5.69 (dd, J=8.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (dd, J=9.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (dd, J=9.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.0, 138.9, 137.9, 137.6, 129.6, 125.5, 125.1, 122.9, 122.7, 121.6, 114.7, 105.4, 71.0, 69.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2934, 1732, 1671, 1205, 1068; HRMS (ESI) [M]+ calc 347.9820 for C16H13O2S79Br, found 347.9834.


1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-2-phenoxyethan-1-one (38)



embedded image


Alcohol 47 (870 mg, 2.491 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and Dess-Martin periodinane (2.113 g, 4.982 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was washed with 1:1 sat. NaHCO3 sol.:sat. Na2S2O3 sol. (4×10 mL), H2O (10 mL), brine (10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was recrystallised from 2-propanol and product 38 was isolated as a pale pink solid (558 mg, 65%). M.p.=139-140° C.; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04-7.97 (m, 1H), 7.89-7.84 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.50 (m, 2H), 7.36-7.29 (m, 2H), 7.04-6.97 (m, 3H), 5.46 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 188.6, 158.0, 140.0, 138.9, 136.7, 129.8, 128.9, 126.1, 125.9, 123.0, 122.0, 115.0, 112.7, 72.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 1670, 1586, 1490, 1090; HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 368.9561 for C16H112S79BrNa, found 368.9554.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-2,2-dimethyl-5-((E)-2-(2-(2-phenoxyacetyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (37)



embedded image


Benzothiophene bromide 38 (100.0 mg, 0.288 mmol, 1 eq) and boronic ester 61 (112 mg, 0.317 mmol, 1.1 eq) were dissolved in THE (3 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (11.8 mg, 0.0144 mmol, 0.05 eq) was added followed by K3PO4 (0.58 mL of 3 M aq. sol, 1.728 mmol, 6 eq). The mixture was heated to 60° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 22 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of sat. NH4Cl sol. (20 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (20 mL), brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (9:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give 37 as pale yellow oil (115 mg, 81%). Rf=0.29 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (ddd, J=8.0, 7.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (ddd, J=8.0, 7.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.32-7.28 (m, 2H), 7.26 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.02-6.95 (m, 3H), 6.19 (dd, J=16.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (s, 2H), 4.82-4.77 (m, 1H), 4.28 (ddd, J=9.0, 6.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.33 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.89-1.82 (m, 1H), 1.78-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.63-1.56 (m, 2H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 189.8, 173.9, 158.0, 141.2, 140.1, 138.1, 134.1, 133.0, 129.7, 128.2, 126.7, 125.6, 125.5, 123.1, 121.9, 114.9, 108.8, 79.6, 78.3, 72.5, 51.6, 33.9, 30.3, 28.5, 25.8, 21.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2934, 1732, 1671, 1205, 1068; [α]D=−9.30 (c=1.1 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na] calc 517.1661 for C28H30O6NaS, found 517.1682.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxy-2-phenoxyethyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-33)



embedded image


Acetonide 37 (115.0 mg, 0.233 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (3.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (108.0 mg, 0.465 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. Et3N (0.06 mL, 0.465 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was concentrated without heat. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (4:1-1:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product mixture isolated as a yellow oil (95.0 mg) which was dissolved in DMF (0.5 mL) and added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (6.7 mg, 0.0105 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.035 mL, 0.899 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.07 mL, 0.523 mmol, 2.5 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 46 h, after which time it was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with 1:1 brine: H2O (4×10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give (1S)-33 as a yellow oil (44 mg, 40%). Rf=0.15 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85-7.79 (m, 2H), 7.39-7.31 (m, 2H), 7.30-7.26 (m, 2H), 6.97 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.84 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (t, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.33-4.27 (m, 1H), 4.21 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.80-3.74 (m, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 3.57 (s, 1H), 2.67 (s, 2H), 2.30 (td, J=7.0, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 1.85-1.79 (m, 1H), 1.73-1.68 (m, 1H), 1.58-1.48 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 158.3, 140.4, 138.9, 138.7, 132.9, 130.7, 129.7, 124.9, 124.6, 124.3, 122.8, 122.8, 121.6, 114.8, 76.1, 74.1, 72.2, 67.7, 51.8, 33.7, 31.8, 21.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3410, 1718, 1600, 1243, 1050; [α]D=−41.94 (c=1 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 479.1504 for C25H28O6NaS, found 479.1485. de=93% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 40:30:30 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.193 min (1S)-epimer, 3.075 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R)-1-hydroxy-2-phenoxyethyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-33)



embedded image


Acetonide 37 (82.1 mg, 0.166 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (3 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (77.1 mg, 0.332 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. Et3N (0.046 mL, 0.332 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was concentrated without heat. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (4:1-1:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product mixture isolated as a yellow oil (66.0 mg) which was dissolved in DMF (1 mL) and added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (4.6 mg, 0.0072 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.02 mL, 0.615 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.05 mL, 0.358 mmol, 2.5 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 65 h, after which time it was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with 1:1 brine: H2O (4×10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford (1R)-33 as a yellow oil (54 mg, 71%). Rf=0.15 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.88-7.79 (m, 2H), 7.41-7.31 (m, 2H), 7.30-7.27 (m, 2H), 6.97 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J=8.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (t, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (dd, J=6.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.82-3.74 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.55-3.45 (m, 1H), 2.71-2.52 (m, 2H), 2.31 (td, J=7.2, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 1.86-1.78 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.66 (m, 1H), 1.59-1.46 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.4, 158.3, 140.4, 138.9, 138.6, 133.0, 130.6, 129.7, 124.9, 124.6, 124.3, 122.8, 122.8, 121.6, 114.8, 76.0, 74.1, 72.2, 67.7, 51.8, 33.7, 31.7, 21.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3410, 1718, 1600, 1243, 1050; [M+Na]+ calc 479.1504 for C25H28O6NaS, found 479.1486. de=97.5% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 40:30:30 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.193 min (1S)-epimer, 3.075 min (1R)-epimer.


3-(4-Fluorophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol (49)



embedded image


4-Fluorophenol 48 (2.0 g, 17.84 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in EtOH (10 mL) and a solution of NaOH (0.856 g, 21.41 mmol, 1.2 eq) in H2O (3 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 10 min. Then, a solution of 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol 44 (1.8 mL, 21.41 mmol, 1.2 eq) in EtOH (2 mL) was slowly added and the mixture was further heated under reflux for 16 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and Et2O (10 mL) was added, along with water (10 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (2×10 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by recrystallisation from 1:1 cyclohexane: Et2O mixture and the product was isolated as a white solid (2.66 g, 80%). Spectral data were consistent with literature.31 Rt=0.30 (1:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.07-6.94 (m, 2H), 6.93-6.83 (m, 2H), 4.16-4.09 (m, 1H), 4.05-4.01 (m, 2H), 3.91-3.83 (m, 1H), 3.81-3.73 (m, 1H), 2.59 (d, J=4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 1H).


2-(4-Fluorophenoxy)acetaldehyde (50)



embedded image


NaIO4 (28.47 mL of a 0.65 M aq. solution, 18.50 mmol, 1.30 eq) was added to a vigorously stirred suspension of silica gel (25.0 g) in CH2Cl2 (180 mL). A solution of the diol 49 (2.65 g, 14.23 mmol, 1.0 eq) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was then added and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was filtered over a small plug of silica, eluted with CH2Cl2 and concentrated to yield the product 50 as a pale yellow oil (1.549 g, 71%). Spectral data were consistent with literature.32 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.86 (t, J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.05-6.97 (m, 2H), 6.89-6.84 (m, 2H), 4.56 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 2H).


1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-2-(4-fluorophenoxy)ethan-1-ol (51)



embedded image


nBuLi (2.25 ml of a 2.5 M sol. in hexanes, 5.631 mmol, 1 eq) was added to THE (4 mL) and cooled to −60° C. TMP (1.04 mL, 6.101 mmol, 1.3 eq) was added and warmed to 0° C. for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to −90° C. and 3-bromobenzothiophene 18 (1 g, 4.693 mmol, 1 eq) dissolved in THE (5 mL) was added dropwise and stirred for 20 min. Fluorophenoxyacetaldehyde 50 (1.2 g, 7.785 mmol, 1.66 eq) dissolved in THE (4 mL) was added at −90° C. and stirred for 1.5 h. Reaction was quenched by addition of 5 M HCl (3 mL) and warmed to room temperature. Sat. NaHCO3 sol. (c. 20 mL) was added to neutralise the reaction mixture and it was extracted with EtOAc (3×30 mL), the extracts were washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (cyclohexane:EtOAc 94:6-80:20) and product 51 was isolated as a pale pink oil (1.33 g, 77%). Rf=0.68 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.78 (dd, J=7.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.53-7.33 (m, 2H), 7.03-6.80 (m, 4H), 5.64 (dd, J=8.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J=9.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (dd, J=9.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.7 (d, JF-C=239 Hz), 154.2 (d, JF-C=2.0 Hz), 138.9, 137.9, 137.5, 125.6, 125.2, 122.9, 122.7, 116.0 (d, JF-C=22.0 Hz), 115.8 (d, JF-C=6.5 Hz), 105.4, 71.8, 69.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3372, 1503, 1199, 1096, 1038; HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 388.9623 for C16H12O2FS79BrNa, found 388.9639.


1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-2-(4-fluorophenoxy)ethan-1-one (52)



embedded image


Alcohol 51 (600 mg, 1.634 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and Dess-Martin periodinane (1.386 g, 3.268 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was washed with 1:1 sat. NaHCO3 sol.: sat. Na2S2O3 sol. (4×10 mL), H2O (10 mL), brine (10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was recrystallised from 2-propanol and product 52 isolated as a pale yellow solid (344 mg, 58%). M.p.=132-135° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00 (dd, J=7.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (dd, J=7.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.60-7.49 (m, 2H), 7.09-6.89 (m, 4H), 5.43 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 188.5, 158.0 (d, JF-C=240 Hz), 154.2 (d, JF-C=2 Hz), 140.0, 138.9, 136.6, 128.9, 126.17, 125.9, 123.0, 116.3 (d, JF-C=8 Hz), 116.2 (d, JF-C=23 Hz), 112.7, 73.6; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 1652, 1505, 1491 1199, 1085; HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 386.9467 for C16H10O2FNaS79Br, found 386.9454.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(2-(2-(4-fluorophenoxy)acetyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (53)



embedded image


Benzothiophene bromide 52 (100 mg, 0.274 mmol, 1 eq) and boronic ester 61 (107 mg, 0.301 mmol, 1.1 eq) were dissolved in THE (3 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (11.2 mg, 0.0137 mmol, 0.05 eq) was added followed by K3PO4 (0.55 mL of 3 M aq. sol, 1.644 mmol, 6 eq). The mixture was heated to 60° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 48 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by addition of sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL). Combined organic layers were washed with H2O (20 mL), brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (6:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc) to afford 53 as a yellow oil (105 mg, 75%). Rf=0.21 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.26 (dd, J=16.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.02-6.89 (m, 4H), 6.19 (dd, J=16.5, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 4.84-4.76 (m, 1H), 4.29 (ddd, J=8.5, 6.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.34 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.91-1.81 (m, 1H), 1.79-1.70 (m, 1H), 1.59-1.55 (m, 2H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 189.4, 173.6, 157.8 (d, JF-C=240 Hz), 154.0 (d, JF-C=2.0 Hz), 140.9, 140.0, 138.0, 134.1, 132.8, 128.1, 126.4, 125.5, 125.4, 122.9, 115.95 (d, JF-C=23.5 Hz), 115.9 (d, JF-C=8.0 Hz), 108.7, 79.4, 78.1, 72.9, 51.4, 33.7, 30.2, 28.3, 25.6, 21.8; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 1732, 1671, 1504, 1199, 1163; [α]D=−10.57 (c=1.1 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 535.1567 for C28H29O6FNaS, found 535.1559.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-8-(2-((S)-2-(4-fluorophenoxy)-1-hydroxyethyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate ((1S)-34)



embedded image


Acetonide 53 (94.8 mg, 0.185 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (3 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (86.2 mg, 0.371 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. Et3N (0.06 mL, 0.371 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was concentrated without heat. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (4:1-1:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product mixture isolated as a yellow oil (80 mg) which was dissolved in DMF (0.4 mL) and added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (5.4 mg, 0.0085 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.03 mL, 0.727 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.06 mL, 0.423 mmol, 2.5 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h, then diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with 1:1 brine: H2O (4×10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give (1S)-34 as a yellow oil (44.0 mg, 51%). Rf=0.16 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82-7.72 (m, 2H), 7.37-7.30 (m, 2H), 6.97-6.89 (m, 2H), 6.87-6.78 (m, 3H), 6.21 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.60 (t, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.32-4.25 (m, 1H), 4.15 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (s, 1H), 3.79-3.70 (m, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.07 (s, 2H), 2.32-2.20 (m, 2H), 1.84-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.71-1.59 (m, 1H), 1.56-1.43 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 157.7 (d, JF-C=239.0 Hz), 154.4 (d, JF-C=2.0 Hz), 140.3, 138.8, 138.7, 133.0, 130.8, 125.0, 124.6, 124.2, 122.7, 122.7, 116.1 (d, JF-C=23 Hz), 115.9 (d, JF-C=7.5 Hz), 76.0, 74.2, 73.0, 67.5, 51.8, 33.7, 31.8, 21.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3020, 1728, 1506, 1080, 1036; [α]D=−29.78 (c=1.1 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na] calc 497.1410 for C25H27O6FNaS, found 497.1413. de=97% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 40:30:30 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.252 min (1S)-epimer, 3.549 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-8-(2-((R)-2-(4-fluorophenoxy)-1-hydroxyethyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)-5,6-dihydroxyoct-7-enoate ((1R)-34)



embedded image


Acetonide 53 (75.9 mg, 0.148 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (2.5 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (68.8 mg, 0.296 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. Et3N (0.04 mL, 0.296 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was concentrated without heat. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (4:1-1:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) and product mixture isolated as a yellow oil (70 mg) which was dissolved in DMF (0.4 mL) and added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (4.7 mg, 0.0074 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.024 mL, 0.636 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.049 mL, 0.370 mmol, 2.5 eq). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 68 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with 1:1 brine: H2O (4×10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give (1R)-34 as a yellow oil (36 mg, 48%). Rf=0.16 (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ 7.95-7.86 (m, 2H), 7.45-7.35 (m, 2H), 7.08-6.97 (m, 2H), 6.98-6.89 (m, 2H), 6.82 (dd, J=16.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (dd, J=7.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.30-4.04 (m, 4H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 2.29 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.15 (s, 2H), 1.81-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.67-1.55 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.38 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.4, 157.8 (d, JF-C=239 Hz), 154.4 (d, JF-C=2.0 Hz), 140.3, 138.9, 138.6, 133.1, 130.7, 125.0, 124.7, 124.3, 122.8, 122.8, 116.1 (d, JF-C=23.0 Hz), 115.9 (d, JF-C=8.0 Hz), 76.0, 74.1, 73.0, 67.7, 51.8, 33.7, 31.8, 21.2; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3020, 1728, 1506, 1080, 1036; [α]D=+45.42 (c=1 in CHCl3); HRMS (ESI) [M+Na] calc 497.1410 for C25H27O6NaSF, found 497.1418. de=93% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 40:30:30 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=2.252 min (1S)-epimer, 3.549 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl 2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)acetate (57)33



embedded image


4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenol 54 (1.0 g, 6.169 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in acetone (25 mL). K2CO3 (938 mg, 6.786 mmol, 1.1 eq) and methyl bromoacetate 56 (0.58 mL, 6.169 mmol, 1 eq) were added and the reaction mixture was heated to reflux and stirred for 4 h. Reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (50 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×50 mL), washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated to product 57, a pale yellow oil (1.432 g, 99%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.53 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.65 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.53 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.65 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.7, 160.1 (q, J=2.0 Hz), 127.0 (q, J=3.5 Hz), 124.2 (q, J=271.2 Hz), 124.0 (q, J=32.8 Hz), 114.6, 65.1, 52.4; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.76; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 1758, 1209, 1162, 1109, 1060; [M]+ calc 234.0504 for C10H9O3F3, found 234.0511.


2-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)acetaldehyde (58)



embedded image


DIBAL (2.5 mL of 1 M sol. in hexanes, 2.50 mmol, 1.17 eq) was added to CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and cooled to −78° C. Ester 57 in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred for a further 30 min at −78° C. The reaction was quenched by the addition of MeOH (2 mL) and sat. Rochelle's salt sol. (50 mL) and stirred while warming to room temperature for 1 h. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×20 mL). Combined organic layers were washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10:1→1:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to yield 58 as a yellow oil (230 mg, 53%). Rf=0.56 (1:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.84 (t, J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.62 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.9, 159.9 (d, JF-C=1.0 Hz), 127.2 (q, JF-C=3.5 Hz), 124.2 (q, JF-C=33.0 Hz), 124.1 (q, JF-C=271.0 Hz), 114.6, 72.5; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.71; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 1741, 1159, 1105, 1042, 1010; [M]+ calc 204.0398 for C9H7O2F3, found 204.0405.


1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)ethan-1-ol (59)



embedded image


nBuLi (2.7 ml of 2.5 M sol. in hexanes, 6.783 mmol, 1 eq) was added to THE (10 mL) and cooled to −60° C. TMP (1.04 mL, 6.101 mmol, 1.3 eq) was added and warmed to 0° C. for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78° C. and 3-bromobenzothiophene 18 (1.2 g, 5.652 mmol, 1 eq) was added dropwise and stirred for 45 min. Trifluormethylphenoxyacetaldehyde 58 (1.5 g, 7.348 mmol, 1.3 eq) dissolved in THE (5 mL) was added at −78° C. and stirred for 1.5 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of HCl (6 mL of a 5 M aq. sol.) and warmed to room temperature. Sat. NaHCO3 sol. (c. 22 mL) was added to neutralise the reaction mixture and it was extracted with EtOAc (3×40 mL), the extracts were washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (cyclohexane:EtOAc 10:1-6:1) to afford product 59 as a pale pink solid (1.166 g, 49%). Rf=0.35 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); M.p.=72-76° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87-7.79 (m, 2H), 7.60-7.54 (m, 2H), 7.52-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.70 (dt, J=8.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (dd, J=9.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J=9.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (d, J=3.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.4 (q, JF-C=1.5 Hz), 138.3, 137.8, 137.5, 127.0 (q, JF-C=3.5 Hz), 125.7, 125.2, 123.8 (q, JFC=33.0 Hz), 122.9, 122.7, 114.7, 105.6, 71.2, 69.0 (*CF3 carbon not visible); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.66 IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3252, 1154, 1102, 1070; HRMS (ESI) [M]+ calc 415.9693 for C17H12O2F3S79Br, found 415.9692.


1-(3-Bromobenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)ethan-1-one



embedded image


Alcohol 59 (500 mg, 1.198 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (8 mL) and Dess-Martin periodinane (1.016 g, 2.397 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL), washed with 1:1 sat. NaHCO3 sol.: sat. Na2S2O3 sol. (4×10 mL), H2O (10 mL), brine (10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was recrystallised from 2-propanol to yield 60 as a pale yellow solid (344 mg, 58%). Rf=0.50 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); M.p.=150-154° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07-7.95 (m, 1H), 7.93-7.84 (m, 1H), 7.62-7.52 (m, 4H), 7.04 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.53 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 187.6, 160.2 (q, JF-C=1.5 Hz), 139.9, 138.7, 136.4, 128.9, 127.0 (q, JF-C=3.5 Hz), 126.1, 125.8, 123.9 (q, JF-C=33.0 Hz), 122.9, 114.8, 112.7, 72.4 (*CF3 carbon not visible); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.69; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 1656, 1203, 1160; HRMS (ESI) [M+Na]+ calc 436.9435 for C17H10O2F3NaS79Br, found 436.9436.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-2,2-dimethyl-5-((E)-2-(2-(2-(4-trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)acetyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (62)



embedded image


Benzothiophene bromide 60 (100 mg, 0.241 mmol, 1 eq) and boronic ester 61 (94 mg, 0.265 mmol, 1.1 eq) were dissolved in THE (3 mL) in a Schlenk tube. PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (10 mg, 0.0121 mmol, 0.05 eq) was added followed by K3PO4 (0.48 mL of 3 M aq. sol, 1.446 mmol, 6 eq). The mixture was heated to 60° C., sealed under nitrogen and stirred for 64 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL). Combined organic layers were washed with H2O (20 mL), brine (20 mL), dried with MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. Crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (6:1→3:1 pentane:EtOAc) to give 62 as a yellow oil (98 mg, 73%). Rf=0.15 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.01 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56-7.44 (m, 4H), 7.23 (dd, J=16.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.18 (dd, J=16.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (s, 2H), 4.82-4.75 (m, 1H), 4.27 (ddd, J=8.5, 6.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.32 (td, J=7.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 1.89-1.80 (m, 1H), 1.77-1.56 (m, 3H), 1.53 (s, 3H), 1.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 188.8, 173.8, 160.4 (q, JF-C=1.2 Hz), 141.1, 140.4, 138.2, 134.5, 132.8, 128.4, 127.2 (q, JF-C=3.7 Hz), 126.4, 125.7, 125.6, 124.1 (q, JF-C=32.9 Hz), 123.1, 114.9, 108.9, 79.5, 78.2, 72.2, 51.6, 33.8, 30.3, 28.4, 25.7, 21.90 (*CF3 carbon not visible); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.68; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 1733, 1671, 1326, 1210, 1159, 1110; [α]D=−1.83 (c=1.26 in CHCl3); [M+Na]+ calc 585.1535 for C29H29O6F3NaS, found 585.1538.


Methyl(5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((S)-1-hydroxy-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)ethyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-35)



embedded image


Acetonide 62 (97.8 mg, 0.174 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (3 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (80.8 mg, 0.348 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. Et3N (0.046 mL, 0.348 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was concentrated without heat. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) and product mixture isolated as a yellow oil (80 mg) which was dissolved in DMF (0.6 mL) and added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[R,R-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (4.9 mg, 0.00765 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.024 mL, 0.636 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.050 mL, 0.370 mmol, 2.5 eq). Reaction was stirred at room temperature for 46 h. Reaction mixture was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with 1:1 brine:H2O (4×10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to give (1S)-35 as a yellow oil (35 mg, 39%). Rf=0.40 (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81-7.74 (m, 2H), 7.49 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.37-7.30 (m, 2H), 6.94 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J=16.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.63 (dd, J=7.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (dd, J=6.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.25-4.19 (m, 2H), 3.76 (td, J=8.5, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.05 (br. s, 2H), 2.25 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.81-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.66-1.59 (m, 1H), 1.54-1.43 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 160.7 (q, JF-C=1.0 Hz), 140.1, 138.8, 138.6, 133.1, 130.9, 127.1 (q, JF-C=3.5 Hz), 125.1, 124.7, 124.4 (q, JF-C=271.0 Hz) 124.2, 123.7 (q, JF-C=33.0 Hz), 122.8, 122.7, 114.8, 76.0, 74.2, 72.3, 67.3, 51.8, 33.6, 31.8, 21.1; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.61; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3422, 1729, 1328, 1122, 1112, 1070; [α]D=−31.25 (c=1.70 in CHCl3); [M+Na] calc 547.1378 for C26H27O6FNaSF3, found 547.1373; de=98% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 40:30:30 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.55 min (1S)-epimer, 2.60 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R)-1-hydroxy-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)ethyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-35)



embedded image


Acetonide 62 (97.8 mg, 0.174 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (3 mL), camphorsulfonic acid (80.8 mg, 0.348 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. Et3N (0.046 mL, 0.348 mmol, 2 eq) was added and reaction mixture was concentrated without heat. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (96:4 CH2Cl2:MeOH) and product mixture isolated as a yellow oil (80 mg) which was dissolved in DMF (0.6 mL) and added to Schlenk tube followed by RuCl[S,S-Tsdpen][p-cymene] catalyst (4.8 mg, 0.00765 mmol, 0.05 eq), HCO2H (0.024 mL, 0.636 mmol, 4.3 eq), Et3N (0.050 mL, 0.370 mmol, 2.5 eq). Reaction was stirred at room temperature for 65 h. Reaction mixture was diluted with sat. NH4Cl sol. (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with 1:1 brine:H2O (4×10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to yield (1R)-35 as a yellow oil (46 mg, 66%). Rf=0.40 (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85-7.79 (m, 2H), 7.52 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (m, 2H), 6.96 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J=16.0, 1H), 6.25 (dd, J=16.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (dd, J=6.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (dd, J=6.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.26-4.22 (m, 2H), 3.80-3.76 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.83 (br. s, 1H), 2.74 (br. s, 1H), 2.30 (td, J=7.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 1.85-1.78 (m, 1H), 1.71-1.66 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.48 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.5, 160.7 (q, JF-C=1.5 Hz), 140.0, 138.9, 138.6, 133.2, 130.9, 127.1 (q, JF-C=3.5 Hz), 125.1, 124.7, 124.4 (q, JF-C=271.5 Hz), 124.2, 123.7 (q, JF-C=32.5 Hz), 122.8, 122.8, 114.8, 75.9, 74.1, 72.3, 67.4, 51.8, 33.7, 31.8, 21.1; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −61.62; IR (ATR) (vmax, cm−1) 3422, 1729, 1328, 1122, 1112, 1070; [α]D=+29.81 (c=0.60 in CHCl3); [M+Na] calc 547.1378 for C26H27O6NaSF3, found 547.1371; de=99% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeCN:EtOH, gradient 75:12.5:12.5 0-1 min, then gradient to 40:30:30 until 6 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=1.55 min (1S)-epimer, 2.60 min (1R)-epimer.


Compounds (1S)-2 and (1R)-2 of Formula (VIr)
1-(5-Bromopyrimidin-4-yl)hexan-1-one (26)



embedded image


5-Bromopyrimidine 25 (800 mg, 5.032 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in H2SO4 (3.48 mL of a 4.5 N aq. sol.) and HOAc (4 mL) and reaction mixture was cooled to 0° C. A solution of FeSO4.7H2O (2.1 g, 7.548 mmol, 1.5 eq) in H2O (3.6 mL) was added dropwise along with tBuOOH (1.2 mL of 70% aq. sol., 7.548 mmol, 1.5 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h warming to room temperature. The pH was adjusted to 8 by addition of sat. NaHCO3 sol. (c. 25 mL), the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×30 mL), and the extracts washed with H2O (30 mL), brine (30 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (6:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to afford 26 as a yellow oil (610 mg, 48%). Rf=0.60 (6:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.15 (s, 1H), 8.97 (s, 1H), 3.03 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.74-1.69 (m, 2H), 1.37-1.28 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 200.7, 161.4, 159.2, 156.4, 116.1, 39.9, 31.2, 23.0, 22.4, 13.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2931, 1730, 1466; HRMS [M+H]+ calc 257.0289 for C10H14N2O79Br, found 257.0300.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-hexanoylpyrimidin-5-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate (24)



embedded image


Bromide 26 (50.0 mg, 0.194 mmol, 1.0 eq) dissolved in THE (1 mL) was added to Schlenk containing PdCl2(dppf).CH2Cl2 (8.1 mg, 0.010 mmol, 0.05 eq) and boronic ester 61 (75.8 mg, 0.214 mmol, 1.1 eq) dissolved in THE (2 mL). K3PO4 (0.39 mL of 3 M aq. sol., 1.17 mmol, 6.03 eq) was added and reaction mixture was heated to 60° C. and stirred for 66 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3×15 mL), and the extracts washed with brine (30 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography (6:1→3:1 cyclohexane:EtOAc) to give 24 as a yellow oil (50 mg, 67%). Rf=0.30 (3:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.17 (s, 1H), 8.99 (s, 1H), 7.19 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.27-4.22 (m, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.19-3.04 (m, 2H), 2.39-2.32 (m, 2H), 1.86-1.79 (m, 1H), 1.75-1.66 (m, 3H), 1.53 (s, 3H), 1.52-1.41 (m, 2H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.37-1.32 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 203.8, 173.8, 157.3, 156.9, 155.5, 132.2, 128.3, 126.4, 108.7, 78.9, 78.2, 51.5, 39.6, 33.7, 31.3, 29.9, 28.2, 25.6, 23.3, 22.4, 21.7, 13.9; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 2933, 1734, 1707, 1211, 1029; [α]D=+10.62 (c=1.65 in CHCl3); HRMS [M+H]+ calc 405.2389 for C22H33N2O5, found 405.2399.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)pyrimidin-5-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1S)-23)



embedded image


Pyrimidine ketone 24 (35.0 mg, 0.0865 mmol, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (1.5 mL). RuCl2[(R)-xylBinap][(R)-DAIPEN] (5.3 mg, 0.0043 mmol, 0.05 eq), triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) and KOtBu (2.4 mg, 0.0216, 0.25 eq) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred under 20 Bar of H2 for 18 h, after which time it was concentrated and purified by column chromatography (95:5 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to yield (1S)-23 as a brown oil (23 mg, 66%). Rf=0.13 (3:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.73 (s, 1H), 6.67 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (dd, J=16.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.93-4.86 (m, 1H), 4.72 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.29-4.23 (m, 1H), 4.19 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.38-2.30 (m, 2H), 1.86-1.80 (m, 1H), 1.78-1.64 (m, 2H), 1.53 (s, 3H), 1.51-1.43 (m, 5H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 1.31-1.24 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.8, 167.0, 156.7, 154.4, 132.2, 127.2, 123.7, 108.9, 78.7, 78.3, 69.6, 51.7, 37.8, 33.7, 31.7, 30.2, 28.2, 25.6, 25.2, 22.7, 21.8, 14.1; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3449, 2949, 1735, 1024; [α]D=−1.49 (c=1.15 in CHCl3); HRMS [M+Na]+ calc 429.2365 for C22H34N2O5Na, found 429.2376; de=96% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeOH, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.58 min (1S)-epimer, 3.85 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl 4-((4S,5R)-5-((E)-2-(4-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)pyrimidin-5-yl)vinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)butanoate ((1R)-23)



embedded image


Pyrimidine Ketone 24 (63.1 mg, 0.156 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in iPrOH (1.5 mL). RuCl2[(S)-xylBinap][(S)-DAIPEN] (9.5 mg, 0.0078 mmol, 0.05 eq), triisopropyl borate (0.02 mL) and KOtBu (4.4 mg, 0.039, 0.25 eq) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred under 20 Bar of H2 for 18 h, after which time it was concentrated and purified by column chromatography (95:5 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford (1R)-23 as a yellow oil (50 mg, 80%). Rf=0.13 (3:1 pentane:EtOAc); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.04 (s, 1H), 8.72 (s, 1H), 6.68 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (dd, J=16.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.98-4.81 (m, 1H), 4.78-4.64 (m, 1H), 4.29-4.21 (m, 1H), 4.18 (br. s, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.38-2.30 (m, 2H), 1.87-1.78 (m, 1H), 1.74-1.65 (m, 2H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.47-1.41 (m, 5H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.32-1.21 (m, 4H), 0.85 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6, 166.9, 156.5, 154.4, 132.1, 127.1, 123.9, 108.8, 78.5, 78.1, 69.5, 51.5, 37.5, 33.5, 31.5, 30.0, 28.1, 25.5, 24.9, 22.5, 21.7, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3449, 2949, 1735, 1024; [α]D=+16.02 (c=1.0 in CHCl3); HRMS [M+Na]+ calc 429.2365 for C22H34N2O5Na, found 429.2371; de=95% as determined by SFC using a Chiralpak IC column (CO2:MeOH, gradient 99:1 0-1 min, then gradient to 60:40 until 5 min, 3 mL/min), Rt=3.58 min (1S)-epimer, 3.85 min (1R)-epimer.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((S)-1-hydroxyhexyl)pyrimidin-5-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1S)-2)



embedded image


Acetonide (1S)-23 (25.0 mg, 0.0615 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.5 mL). Camphorsulfonic acid (28.6 mg, 0.123 mmol, 2 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by preparative TLC (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford (1S)-2 as a yellow oil (13 mg, 58%). Rf=0.37 (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.73 (s, 1H), 6.73 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (dd, J=16.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.97-4.87 (m, 1H), 4.38-4.31 (m, 1H), 4.24 (br. s, 1H), 3.82-3.77 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.80 (br. s, 1H), 2.72 (br. s, 1H), 2.40-2.34 (m, 2H), 1.90-1.68 (m, 4H), 1.53-1.49 (m, 2H), 1.46-1.39 (m, 2H), 1.33-1.25 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 166.9, 156.3, 154.2, 134.0, 127.4, 123.2, 75.1, 73.8, 69.6, 51.7, 37.4, 33.5, 31.6, 31.4, 24.9, 22.5, 20.9, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3408, 2954, 1731, 1076; [α]D=−7.89 (c=1.0 in CHCl3); HRMS [M+Na]+ calc 389.2052 for C19H30N2O5Na, found 389.2044.


Methyl (5S,6R,E)-5,6-dihydroxy-8-(4-((R)-1-hydroxyhexyl)pyrimidin-5-yl)oct-7-enoate ((1R)-2)



embedded image


Acetonide (1R)-23 (30.0 mg, 0.0738 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in MeOH (1.8 mL). Camphorsulfonic acid (34.4 mg, 0.148 mmol, 2 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by preparative TLC (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to afford (1R)-2 as a yellow oil (16 mg, 60%). Rf=0.37 (92:8 CH2Cl2:MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.04 (s, 1H), 8.72 (s, 1H), 6.71 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (dd, J=16.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (dd, J=7.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.36-4.30 (m, 1H), 4.23 (br. s, 1H), 3.82-3.76 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.79 (br. s, 2H), 2.41-2.33 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.82 (m, 1H), 1.77-1.67 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.47 (m, 3H), 1.45-1.37 (m, 2H), 1.31-1.22 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.2, 166.8, 156.4, 154.3, 133.8, 127.3, 123.4, 75.1, 73.8, 69.6, 51.7, 37.4, 33.5, 31.6, 31.5, 24.9, 22.5, 20.9, 14.0; IR (CHCl3) (vmax, cm−1) 3408, 2954, 1731, 1076; [α]D=+22.25 (c=0.8 in CHCl3); HRMS [M+Na] calc 389.2052 for C19H3N2O5Na, found 389.2046.


The forgoing embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the protection afforded by the claims, but rather to describe examples of how the invention may be put into practice. Throughout this specification, the term “comprising” or “comprises” means including the component(s) specified but not to the exclusion of the presence of other components. The term “consisting essentially of” or “consists essentially of” means including the components specified but excluding other components except for materials present as impurities, unavoidable materials present as a result of processes used to provide the components, and components added for a purpose other than achieving the technical effect of the invention. Typically, when referring to compositions, a composition consisting essentially of a set of components will comprise less than 5% by weight, typically less than 3% by weight, more typically less than 1% by weight of non-specified components.


The term “consisting of” or “consists of” means including the components specified but excluding addition of other components.


Whenever appropriate, depending upon the context, the use of the term “comprises” or “comprising” may also be taken to encompass or include the meaning “consists essentially of” or “consisting essentially of”, and may also be taken to include the meaning “consists of” or “consisting of”.


Although a few preferred embodiments have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications might be made without departing from the scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.


Attention is directed to all papers and documents which are filed concurrently with or previous to this specification in connection with this application and which are open to public inspection with this specification, and the contents of all such papers and documents are incorporated herein by reference.


All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of such features and/or steps are mutually exclusive.


Each feature disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, and drawings) may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent or similar purpose, unless expressly stated otherwise. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is one example only of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.


The invention is not restricted to the details of the foregoing embodiment(s). The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.


REFERENCES



  • (1) Serhan, C. N.; Hamberg, M.; Samuelsson, B. Trihydroxytetraenes: a novel series of compounds formed from arachidonic acid in human leukocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1984, 118, 943-949.

  • (2) Serhan, C. N.; Hamberg, M.; Samuelsson, B. Lipoxins: a novel series of biologically active compounds formed from arachidonic acid in human leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acac. Sci., 1984; pp 5335-5339.

  • (3) Bonnans, C.; Vachier, I.; Chavis, C.; Godard, P.; Bosquet, J.; Chanez, P. Lipoxins are potential endogenous anti-inflammatory mediators in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 165, 1531-1535.

  • (4) Levy, B. D.; Bonnans, C.; Silverman, E. S.; Palmer, L. J.; Marigowda, G.; Israel, E. Diminished lipoxin biosynthesis in severe asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 172, 824-830.

  • (5) Kieran, N. E.; Maderna, P.; Godson, C. Lipoxins: potential anti-inflammatory, proresolution and antifibrotic mediators in renal disease. Kidney Int. 2004, 65, 1145-1154.

  • (6) McMahon, B.; Godson, C. Lipoxins: endogenous regulators of inflammation. Am. J. Renal Physiol. 2004, 286, F189-F201.

  • (7) Fiore, S.; Serhan, C. N. Lipoxin A4 receptor activation is distinct from that of the formyl peptide receptor in myeloid cells: inhibition of CD11/18 expression by lipoxin A4-lipoxin A4 receptor interaction. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 16678-16686.

  • (8) Serhan, C. N.; Parkos, C. A.; Delp-Archer, C.; Madara, J. L. Lipoxin A4 modulates transmigration of human neutrophils across intestinal epithelial monolayers. J. Clin. Invest. 1993, 92, 75-82.

  • (9) Filep, J. G.; Zouki, C.; Petasis, N. A.; Hachicha, M.; Serhan, C. N. Anti-inflammatory actions of lipoxin A4 stable analogs are demonstrable in human whole blood: modulation of leukocyte adhesion molecules and inhibition of neutrophil-endothelial interactions. Blood 1999, 94, 4132-4142.

  • (10) Papayianni, A.; Serhan, C. N.; Brady, H. R. Lipoxin A4 and B4 inhibit leukotriene-stimulated interactions of human neutrophils and endothelial cells. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 2264-2272.

  • (11) Brady, H. R.; Persson, U.; Ballermann, B. J.; Brenner, B. M.; Serhan, C. N. Leukotrienes stimulate neutrophil adhesion to mesangial cells: modulation with lipoxins. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259, F809-F815.

  • (12) Godson, C.; Mitchell, S.; Harvey, K.; Petasis, N. A.; Hogg, N.; Brady, H. R. Cutting Edge: Lipoxins rapidly stimulate nonphlogistic phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 1663-1667.

  • (13) Mitchell, S.; Thomas, G.; Harvey, K.; Cottell, D. C.; Reville, K.; Berlasconi, G.; Petasis, N. A.; Erwig, L.; Rees, A. J.; Savill, J.; Brady, H. R.; Godson, C. Lipoxins, aspirin-triggered epi-lipoxins, lipoxin stable analogues, and the resolution of inflammation: stimulation of macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils in vivo. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 2497-2507.

  • (13a) Brennan et al., J Am So Nephrol. 2013.

  • (13b) Borgeson et al., Cell Metab 2015.

  • (14) Serhan, C. N.; Savill, J. Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 1191-1197.

  • (15) Levy, B. D.; Clish, C. B.; Schmidt, B.; Gronert, K.; Serhan, C. N. Lipid mediator class switching during acute inflammation: signals in resolution. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 612-619.

  • (16) Clish, C. B.; Levy, B. D.; Chiang, N.; Tai, H.-H.; Serhan, C. N. A novel role for 15-oxoprostaglandin 13-reductase/leukotriene B4 12-hydroxydehydrogenase in inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 25372-25380.

  • (17) Serhan, C. N. Lipoxins and novel aspirin-triggered 15-epi-lipoxins [ATL]: a jungle of cell-cell interactions or a therapeutic opportunity? Prostaglandins 1997, 53, 107-137.

  • (18) Duffy, C. D.; Guiry, P. J., Recent advances in the chemistry and biology of stable synthetic lipoxin analogues. Med Chem Comm 2010, 1, 249-265.

  • (19) C. D. Duffy, P. Maderna, C. McCarthy, C. E. Loscher, C. Godson, P. J. Guiry, Chem Med Chem 2010, 5, 517-522.


Claims
  • 1. A compound of formula (I):
  • 2. The compound according to claim 1, wherein L is selected from the heterocyclic groups:
  • 3. The compound according to claim 1, wherein L is the group:
  • 4. The compound according to claim 1, wherein L is:
  • 5. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R2 is a C1-4 alkoxy group.
  • 6. The compound according to claim 1 having the formula (II):
  • 7. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R3 is a C1-9 alkyl group.
  • 8. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R3 has the formula (III):
  • 9. The compound according to claim 1 having the formula (IV):
  • 10. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound according to claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, lubricant or carrier.
  • 11. A medicament comprising the composition according to claim 10.
  • 12. A method of treating a disease or condition in which inhibition of acute inflammation and/or promotion of its resolution and/or suppression of fibrosis is beneficial, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound according to claim 1.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 for use in the treatment of atherosclerosis.
  • 14. The method of claim 12 for use in the treatment of macrovascular complications, microvascular complications, or both, associated with diabetes.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the disease or condition is asthma.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the disease or condition is glomerulonephritis.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1614224 Aug 2016 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2017/070979 8/18/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/033642 2/22/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
8809382 Powell et al. Aug 2014 B2
20050203184 Petasis Sep 2005 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/070979, dated Oct. 30, 2017, 12 pages.
Duffy et al., “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Pyridine-Containing Lipoxin A4 Analogues,” Communications, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, ChemMedChem, 2010, 5, 517-522.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-530542, Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210053927 A1 Feb 2021 US