1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of data entry and retrieval and, more particularly, to a method and system for indexing annotations made for a variety of heterogeneous data objects.
2. Description of the Related Art
An annotation system is used to create, store, and retrieve descriptive information about objects. Virtually any identifiable type of object may be annotated, such as a matrix of data (e.g., a spreadsheet or database table), a text document, or an image. Further, subportions of objects (sub-objects) may be annotated, such as a cell, row, or column in a database table or a section, paragraph, or word in a text document. Some annotation systems store annotations separately, without modifying the annotated data objects themselves. For example, annotations are often contained in annotation records stored in a separate annotation store, typically a database. The annotation records typically contain information about the annotations contained therein, such as the creation date and author of the annotation, and an identification of the annotated data object, typically in the form of an index.
An indexing scheme is typically used to map each annotation to the annotated data object or sub-object, based on the index. Therefore, the index must provide enough specificity to allow the indexing scheme to locate the annotated data object (or sub-object). Further, the indexing scheme must work both ways: given an index, the indexing scheme must be able to locate the annotated data object and, given an object, the indexing scheme must be able to calculate the index for use in classification, comparison, and searching (e.g., to search for annotations for a given data object).
Databases are typically used as the annotation store for performance reasons, so that annotation records can be efficiently stored and retrieved. Therefore, the annotation indexing scheme should be designed so that the annotation records can be efficiently indexed, for example, taking advantage of existing indexing technology that utilizes database keys for indexing. A database key is a unique identifier for an entity in a database table (e.g., a social security is often used as a database key). To enable searching, sorting, and comparisons (necessary to query an annotation database), it is generally a requirement that database keys have a homogeneous content and attribute count (i.e., the same number and type of parameters).
However, a problem arises when the annotations must reference a variety of different (i.e., heterogeneous) types of objects, which is fairly common in modern business enterprises. For example, an annotation system for a biomedical enterprise may need to annotate documents, experimental data, genomic data, images, and the like. The problem arises because each of these different types of objects has a different way of identifying itself, and may also have a different number and type of sub-objects, resulting in different types of indexes for each. For example, a database table may be indexed using four parameters (location, table, row, and column), while a text document may be indexed using five parameters (location, file, section name, paragraph, and word). Thus, ideally, the indexing method for each type of object would be allowed to be different.
Given that an annotation system may need to index a variety of different data objects having a variety of different identifying parameters, the requirement to be able to index and search the annotation store seems in opposition to the conventional database indexing requirement that database keys used for indexing have a homogeneous content and attribute count. Accordingly, there is a need for an improved method for indexing annotations, preferably that allows for the flexible identification of a variety of different type annotated data objects.
The present invention generally is directed to a method, system, and article of manufacture for indexing annotations made for a variety of different type objects.
One embodiment provides a method generally including creating an annotation for a first data object identified by a first plurality of identifying parameters, creating an index for the first data object, the index comprising one or more index values, each generated based on one or more of the first plurality of identifying parameters, creating an annotation record containing the annotation and the index for the first data object.
Another embodiment provides a method of managing annotations for a plurality of different type data objects. The method generally includes receiving a set of parameters identifying a data object, selecting, based on the set of identifying parameters, a mapping from a plurality of mappings, each containing a different set of mapping functions, and creating an index for the data object by mapping the identifying parameters to columns in an index table, as specified by the mapping functions of the selected mapping.
Another embodiment provides a computer-readable medium containing a program for indexing annotations. When executed by a processor, the program performs operations generally including creating an annotation for a data object identified by a plurality of identifying parameters, creating an index for the data object, the index comprising one or more index values, each generated based on one or more of the plurality of identifying parameters, and creating an annotation record containing the annotation and the index for the data object.
Another embodiment provides a system including an annotation database for storing annotation records containing annotations for the different type data objects, an index table for storing indexes for the different type data objects, the index having a plurality of columns, each corresponding to a different value of the indexes, a plurality of mappings, each containing functions for mapping a set of identifying parameters for a different type of data object to one or more columns in the index table, and an executable annotation component. The annotation component is generally configured to receive sets of parameters identifying data objects and, for each set of identifying parameters received, select one of the mappings based on the corresponding set of identifying parameters, and create an index for the first data object by mapping the first set of identifying parameters to columns in the index table, as specified by the mapping functions of the selected mapping.
So that the manner in which the above recited features, advantages and objects of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
The present invention provides methods, systems, and articles of manufacture that may be used for indexing annotations made for a variety of different type (i.e., heterogeneous) data objects. A set of parameters uniquely identifying an annotated data object may be converted to an index comprising a set of index values, each corresponding to a column in a homogeneous index table. In order to accommodate the indexing of heterogeneous data objects, a mapping may be provided for each different type (or classification) of data object that may be annotated, that defines how the identifying parameters of that type will be mapped to the columns of the homogeneous index table. By generating a homogeneous set of index values, conventional indexing schemes may be utilized to organize and search annotations made for a variety of different object types. Indexing annotations for new classifications of data objects may be readily supported via the addition of new mappings, without having to redesign the index table or the underlying indexing scheme.
As used herein, the term annotation generally refers to any type of descriptive information associated with one or more data objects. Annotations may exist in various forms, including textual annotations (descriptions, revisions, clarifications, comments, instructions, etc.), graphical annotations (pictures, symbols, etc.), sound clips, etc. While an annotation may exist in any or all of these forms, to facilitate understanding, embodiments of the present invention may be described below with reference to textual annotations as a particular, but not limiting, example of an annotation. Accordingly, it should be understood that the following techniques described with reference to textual annotations may also be applied to other types of annotations, as well, and, more generally, to any type of data object that references another data object. Further, in order to facilitate the following discussion, the term document will generally refer to any type of file, or other type collection of data, that contains an annotated data sub-object or is annotated itself, including, but not limited to text documents, databases, database tables, spreadsheets, HTML pages, Adobe Acrobat® (PDF) documents, image files, other multimedia files, and any other type of document or file that may be annotated or may contain annotated sub-objects.
One embodiment of the invention is implemented as a program product for use with a computer system such as, for example, the computer system 110 of the data processing environment 100 shown in
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the invention, may be part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, module, object, or sequence of instructions. The software of the present invention typically is comprised of a multitude of instructions that will be translated by the native computer into a machine-readable format and hence executable instructions. Also, programs are comprised of variables and data structures that either reside locally to the program or are found in memory or on storage devices. In addition, various programs described hereinafter may be identified based upon the application for which they are implemented in a specific embodiment of the invention. However, it should be appreciated that any particular nomenclature that follows is used merely for convenience, and thus the invention should not be limited to use solely in any specific application identified and/or implied by such nomenclature.
Referring now to
The computer system 110 could include a number of operators and peripheral systems as shown, for example, by a mass storage interface 137 operably connected to a direct access storage device (DASD) 138, by a video interface 140 operably connected to a display 142, and by a network interface 144 operably connected to the networked devices 146. The display 142 may be any video output device for outputting viewable information. The networked devices 146 may be any combination of any type networked devices, such as networked workstations, servers, printers, and network accessed storage (NAS) devices.
Computer system 110 is shown comprising at least one processor 112, which obtains instructions and data via a bus 114 from a main memory 116. The processor 112 could be any processor adapted to support the methods of the invention. The main memory 116 is any memory sufficiently large to hold the necessary programs and data structures. Main memory 116 could be one or a combination of memory devices, including Random Access Memory, nonvolatile or backup memory, (e.g., programmable or Flash memories, read-only memories, etc.). In addition, memory 116 may be considered to include memory physically located elsewhere in a computer system 110, for example, any storage capacity used as virtual memory or stored on a mass storage device (e.g., DASD 138) or on another computer coupled to the computer system 110 via bus 114.
The memory 116 is shown configured with an operating system 118. The operating system 118 is the software used for managing the operation of the computer system 110. Examples of suitable operating systems include such as IBM's OS/400, IBM's AIX, Unix, Linux, Microsoft Windows®, and the like. The memory 116 further includes at least one application 120 and an annotation system 130. For some embodiments, the annotation system 130 may be integrated with the operating system 118 and/or may be capable of operating in a stand alone manner, for example, without an application 120.
The application 120 and the annotation system 130 are software products comprising a plurality of instructions that are resident at various times in various memory and storage devices in the computer system 110. When read and executed by one or more processors 112 in the computer system 110, the application 120 and the annotation system 130 cause the computer system 110 to perform the steps necessary to execute steps or elements embodying the various aspects of the invention. The application 120 is generally configured to access (i.e., generate, edit, modify, display, etc.) a data object 122.
The data object 122 may be any type data object, such as a text document, a spreadsheet, a database file, a database table, a multimedia file, or any subcomponent thereof, and may be identified by a set of identifying (ID) parameters 124. As will be described in greater detail below, the ID parameters 124 may include any suitable number and type of parameters containing sufficient information to uniquely identify the data object 122, and the exact contents therein may vary for each type of object. However, each set of ID parameters 124 will likely include at least one parameter specifying a location of the data object 122, such as a full file name including a full directory path or a Uniform Resource Locator (URL).
The annotation system 130 is generally configured to allow users of the application program 120 to generate, store, and retrieve annotations associated with the data object 122. The annotations may be contained in annotation records 150, for example, stored in an annotation database 139 (e.g., in the DASD 138). The annotation records 150 may also contain various information about the annotation, such as the author and creation date of the annotation, as well as an index identifying the annotated data object 122. While illustrated as separate from the application 120, for some embodiments, the annotation system 130 may be an integral part of the application 120 or a “plug-in” application. In either case, as illustrated, the annotation system 130 may include various software components, such as an indexing component 132 configured to generate an index for the data object 122 based on the ID parameters 124 and one or more mappings, which may be contained in mapping tables 134. Indexes created for annotated data objects 122 may be stored in an index table 152 in the annotation data base 139.
Operation of the annotation system 130 and components therein may best be described with reference to
For some embodiments, the annotation generation component 133 may allow annotations to be created in a way that allows searching the annotation database 139 for annotations satisfying certain query conditions (as described below with reference to
At step 304, an index 151 is created for the annotated data object 122, wherein the index 151 comprises a set of index values, each index value generated based on one or more of the ID parameters 124. As illustrated, the index 151 may be added to an index table 152 containing columns, each corresponding to one of the index values. At step 306, an annotation record is created containing the index for the data object and the annotation created for the data object. As described below with reference to
The exact operations performed to create the index 151 based on the ID parameters 124 may vary with different data types, and may be dictated by a mapping table 134 associated with the data type of the annotated data object 122. The mapping table 134 may include one or more mappings (e.g., information, such as mapping functions, used to map ID parameters to index values).
The operations 400 begin, at step 402, by receiving object ID parameters 124, for example, after invoking the annotation generation component 133 to create the annotation 153. As previously described, the ID parameters 124 may uniquely identify the data object 122, and the exact type and number of the parameters 124 may vary depending on the type of data object 122. For example, if the data object 122 is a text document (or a sub-component thereof), the ID parameters 124 may include parameters for a location, file, section name, paragraph and word. Further, some ID parameters may specify a file name having an extension indicative of the type of file.
At step 404, the annotated data object 122 is classified, for example, based on the ID parameters 124, as being associated with a text document, a database table, or other type of document. The determined classification may be used to select an appropriate mapping table 134 for converting the ID parameters 124 to index values. For example, if the data object 122 is classified as being associated with a database, a database mapping table 134 is selected, at step 408. If the data object 122 is classified as being associated with a text document, as determined at step 410, a text document mapping table 134 is selected, at step 412.
If the data object is classified as being associated with another type of document, processing proceeds to step 414 to select a mapping table for the other type document. Examples of other types of documents that may be supported by the annotation system 130 include, but are not limited to, Adobe Acrobat® files (having objects identified by one or more of an ObjectID, GenNumber, Offset, and Length) and HTML document (with objects identified by one or more of an Anchor, Image, and Link). Accordingly, one advantage of the indexing scheme described herein is that supporting a new type of data object classification essentially requires little more than the development of a new mapping table 134 configured to map the ID parameters 124 of the new type of data object to columns of the index table 152.
At step 416, the index 151 is created for the object 122 by mapping the ID parameters 124 to column values of the index table 152, as specified by the selected mapping table 134. The mapping tables 134 may each contain a set of mapping functions that specify how to convert the ID parameters 124, which may vary in number and/or type with each different classification of data type, into an index 151 comprising a homogeneous set of index values. In other words, the mapping tables 134 ensure that indexes 151 created for different types of data objects 122 may comprise the same type and number of index values, regardless of their corresponding type (e.g., text document, database table, etc.), by mapping one or more of the ID parameters 124 to one or more of the column values of the index table 152.
For illustrative purposes, the index table 152 of
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
On the other hand, as illustrated in
COL2=0×10000*PARAM3+PARAM2
Accordingly, if column 2 is 8 bytes long, the second parameter will be contained in the lower four bytes, while the third parameter will be contained in the upper four bytes. Of course, any other suitable equation or technique may also be used to map more than one ID parameter to a single column value.
As previously described, for retrieval purposes, the indexing component 133 should also be configured to generate a set of ID parameters 124 for an annotated data object 122, given a corresponding index 151. For example, the annotation system 130 may return a set of ID parameters 124 to an application program 120 to identify an annotated data object. Therefore, mapping tables 134 may also contain sufficient information (e.g., “inverse” mapping functions) to allow the indexing component 133 to convert column values of an index 151 back to a set of ID parameters 124.
The operations 450 begin, at step 452, by receiving an index for an annotated data object, for example, as a result of searching the index table 152 for a set of annotated data objects 122 in response to a request from an application program 120. The index may be in the form of a set of column values, or a single value generated by combining the column values. At step 454, a classification for the object is determined based on the index. As described with reference to
Documents are typically arranged as hierarchical structures of different “levels” of data objects, each of which may be annotated for different reasons. For example, a database table may be annotated to explain why it was created (its purpose), a database column may be annotated to clarify what type of data is stored therein, a database row may be annotated to comment on a particular set of data (e.g., all related to a common patient), while a database cell may be annotated to comment on the significance of a particular value stored therein (e.g., an alarmingly high test result). In general, higher level data objects may be identified by indexes with fewer column values than indexes for lower level data objects (which may be regarded as sub-objects of the higher level data objects).
Accordingly, different level data objects (as well as different data objects of the same level) within the same document may be identified by indexes comprising different combinations of some or all of the index table column values. For example, as illustrated in
In a similar manner, as illustrated in
As will be described in greater detail below, a list of annotated data objects may be obtained by searching the index table 152 for indexes that match one or more “higher level” column values, without specifying column values used to identify lower level sub-objects (or by using a “wild card” for such column values). As an example, indexes for annotated sections, paragraphs, and words of a text document, may all be retrieved by searching the index table 152 for indexes matching only specified location and file column values. As another example, indexes for annotated columns, rows, and cells of a database table may be retrieved by searching only on location and table column values.
As previously described, by generating an index table 152 with a homogeneous set of index values, conventional indexing schemes may be utilized to organize and search annotations made for a variety of different type data objects. For example, the index table 152 may be searched to obtain a list of annotated data objects for a specified document (as illustrated in
For example,
As described above, a document may be identified by a relatively small number of “high level” ID parameters (e.g., location and file parameters), which may be mapped to column values of a corresponding index 151. Any of the lower level data objects of the document that have been annotated should have corresponding entries in the index table 152 with the same “high level” column values. Thus, a query searching the index table 152 for matches on these column values should return a list of indexes for all the “lower level” annotated data objects for the document. At step 708, each of the indexes returned from the query is converted to a set of ID parameters that uniquely identifies the annotated data object (e.g., as described above with reference to
As described above, the requesting application program 120 may then provide an indication of the annotated data objects, for example, by displaying a set of annotation icons 155, as illustrated in the exemplary graphical user interface (GUI) screen 800 of
The corresponding annotations may be viewed, for example, by selecting one of the annotation icons 155 (e.g., via a mouse click) or by pressing a View Annotations button 802. As shown in
For some embodiments, in an effort to improve performance, the index table 152 may first be searched to determine if an annotation exists (e.g., an entry in the index table indicates an annotation exists), and the corresponding annotation may be subsequently retrieved. Further, depending on the implementation, the search may be limited to annotations for the specified data object itself, or may include annotations for any sub-objects of the specified data object. If the request includes annotations for sub-objects, the query may be fashioned as described above with reference to
At step 908, a list of annotations with matching index values is received and, at step 910, the list of annotations is returned. If the request included annotations for sub-objects, the operations 900 may also include converting indexes for the annotated sub-objects into ID parameters identifying the sub-objects and returning the sub-object ID parameters with the list of annotations. In either case, upon receiving the list of annotations, a requesting application program may display the annotations in a document, as shown above in the GUI screen 800 of
For some implementations, an application program 120 may display a list of annotations in a separate annotation window 1000, as illustrated in
Therefore, for some embodiments, the annotation system 130 may provide a GUI screen 1020 for searching annotations (possibly accessible from the annotation window 1000 via a Search Annotations button 1002), as illustrated in
At step 1110, the annotations and corresponding sets of identifying parameters are returned, for example, to a requesting application program 120. The application program 120 may then provide an indication of the annotations satisfying the specified conditions, for example, as a list of annotations in an annotation window 1000, as shown in
By creating a table of homogeneous indexes, annotations created for a wide variety of heterogeneous data objects may be organized and searched using conventional database indexing technology. Homogeneous indexes may be created by mapping one or more parameters that uniquely identify annotated data objects to one or more column values in the index table. Mapping tables that define how the identifying parameters of the corresponding data type will be mapped to the columns of the index table may be provided for each different type (or classification) of data object that may be annotated. Accordingly, indexes may be created for new data object classifications via the addition of new mapping tables, without having to redesign the index table or the underlying indexing scheme, thus saving development time and associated cost.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/600,382 filed Jun. 20, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,321,470, which is related to commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,519,603, entitled “Method and System for Organizing an Annotation Structure and for Querying Data and Annotations,” which are both herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5253362 | Nolan et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5309359 | Katz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5404295 | Katz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5548739 | Yung | Aug 1996 | A |
5600775 | King et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5761429 | Thompson | Jun 1998 | A |
5832474 | Lopresti et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5930746 | Ting | Jul 1999 | A |
5940821 | Wical | Aug 1999 | A |
5953718 | Wical | Sep 1999 | A |
5999182 | Etchemendy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6038560 | Wical | Mar 2000 | A |
6195652 | Fish | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226638 | Okura et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226792 | Goiffon et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249784 | Macke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260043 | Puri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279014 | Schilit et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311189 | deVries et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332144 | deVries et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6453312 | Goiffon et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460034 | Wical | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484156 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493721 | Getchius et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496843 | Getchius et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519592 | Getchius et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519603 | Bays et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523028 | DiDomizio et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549922 | Srivastava et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571295 | Sidana | May 2003 | B1 |
6665581 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665681 | Vogel | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6725227 | Li | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6799298 | deVries et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6826559 | Ponte | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847384 | Sabadell et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6871318 | Wynblatt et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6889260 | Hughes | May 2005 | B1 |
6901428 | Frazier et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6934909 | Tewari | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956593 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6996558 | Dettinger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6996728 | Singh | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999959 | Lawrence et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010779 | Rubin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013307 | Bays et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7107260 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7152072 | Dobrowski et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162691 | Chatterjee et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7194483 | Mohan et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7243301 | Bargeron et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260777 | Fitzsimons et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7315857 | Dettinger et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7707212 | Dettinger et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20010051958 | deVries et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020026461 | Kutay et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020143860 | Catan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174201 | Ramer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030061028 | Dey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069881 | Huttunen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074375 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030196164 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040068489 | Dettinger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040138946 | Stolze | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150669 | Sabiers et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163042 | Altman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040192343 | Toyama | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205514 | Sommerer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205545 | Bargeron et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260714 | Chatterjee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261016 | Glass et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050091197 | Dettinger et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091198 | Dettinger et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050203876 | Cragun et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256825 | Dettinger et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256867 | Walther et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1039398 | May 2002 | EP |
1997015018 | Apr 1997 | WO |
1999939286 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2000051021 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2001024060 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“GSDB 1.0 Schema Manual,” Dec. 1996, <http://www.negr.org/research/sequence/schema.html.>. |
Barghouti, Naser et al., Improvise—a process modeling interface with multimedia graph diagrams (Background and Overview), Electronic Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Effective Abstractions in Multimedia: Layout, D Presentation, and Interaction, Oct. 1995, ACM, New York, New York, United States. |
Electrical Schematics Page, Jefferson Lab: Exploring the Nature of MAnER, Apr. 25, 2002, retrieved Oct. 14, 2006, <https://www.jlab.org/accel/inLgroup/elecl.htm>. |
PCT International Search Report dated May 10, 2004, International Application No. PCT/EP20041051082, International Filing Date Oct. 6, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070271249 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10600382 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11833884 | US |