The present invention relates to packet-based communications system including error correction coding to improve reliability.
Packet-based communications systems have been developed for transmitting digital signals. In some communications systems, the communications channel is noisy and can introduce errors into the packets, decreasing the reliability of the communications. In others, such as the internet, the communications channel can lose packets altogether. Systems have been developed to increase the reliability of such communications systems.
These systems include some kind of error detection and correction mechanism. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,918, entitled “METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EFFICIENT ERROR CORRECTION IN A PACKET-SWITCHED COMMUNICATION SYSTEM” and issued Oct. 14, 1997 to Tran et al., a packet switched communication system is disclosed in which packets of data are divided into segments. A first error detection code is generated over each segment, and a second over the packet as a whole. The segments making up the packet are then transmitted over the communications channel. A receiver receives the segments and checks the error detection codes in each segment and the packet. If an error is detected in a segment or the packet as a whole, the receiver sends a negative acknowledgement to the transmitter, which, in response, retransmits the erroneous segment, or the entire packet, until it has been successfully received.
This system depends on negative acknowledgements and retransmission to correct erroneous packets. This requires additional communications, reducing the overall throughput, and requires a back channel from the receiver to the transmitter to communicate the negative acknowledgements. Such a back channel is not always available. For example, broadcast systems such as terrestrial, cable and satellite television transmission system are one-way systems only.
In European patent publication EP 1 014 730 A1, entitled “FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION AT MPEG-2 TRANSPORT STREAM LAYER” and published Dec. 22, 1999 for Wan et al., an MPEG packet system is disclosed in which a plurality of packets, termed a supergroup, is accumulated, and an error correction code is generated over the data in the supergroup. The error correction code data is then packetized and appended to the packet stream as optional packets. Appropriately equipped receivers may receive the MPEG packets and the optional appended error correction code packets and perform error correction on the received supergroup of MPEG packets.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,875, entitled “AN HDTV COMPRESSION SYSTEM” issued Jun. 16, 1992 to Raychaudhuri et al., discloses a packet communications system in which high priority and low priority MPEG data are transmitted in respective packet streams on separate modulated carriers. Each packet in both packet streams includes an error detection code. In addition respective forward error correction codes are calculated over successive blocks of packets in both packet streams then appended to the packet streams. At the receiver, the forward error correction code is used to correct for errors in the respective received packet streams. Then the error detection code in each packet in both packet streams is analyzed to determine if an error remains in that packet. If such as error is detected, then some form of error concealment is performed. For example, for video MPEG data, should an erroneous packet be detected, the image area represented by that packet is not updated to prevent the erroneous data from distorting the image.
It is known that every error correction code can correct a maximum number of errors. The number of errors correctable by the code is related to the number of code bits relative to the number of data bits protected, i.e. to correct more errors requires more code bits, which, in turn, increases the overhead and lowers the throughput of the communications system. While it is possible to select an error correction code which is strong enough to correct for the loss of one or more packets (e.g. in EP 1 014 730 A1 up to nine lost packets and up to 4½ ‘errored’ packets may be corrected), there is always a limit to the number of lost packets which may be corrected. If any more than that number is lost, then all of the packets in the block of packets over which the error correction code was originally calculated are compromised. In such a case, in order to minimize potential image degradation, none of the packets in the group are used in generating an image. However, it is desirable that, even if more than the predetermined number of packets is lost, the data in the remaining packets be made available for use.
In accordance with principles of the present invention, a packet stream is hierarchically block encoded by appending a packet error correction code to each packet in the packet stream and appending a block error correction code to successive blocks of packets in the packet stream to form a hierarchically error correction coded packet stream. This packet stream is then transmitted through a communications channel. Errors are corrected in each block of packets in response to each block error correction code and errors are corrected in each packet in response to each packet error correction code.
In this manner, error correction encoding of a packetized data stream is partitioned into ECC encoding each individual packet and ECC encoding blocks of packets. The inventor has realized that by including separate error correction coding for each block of packets and for each packet by itself, it is possible to provide some level of error detection and correction even with the loss of more than the predetermined number of packets. That is, if more than the predetermined number of packets are lost or corrupted, then the block error correction code will be unable to provide any correction. However, it is still possible that some of the packets will have few enough errors that the associated packet error correction code can correct them. This will enable at least some of the packets in the block of packets to provide reliable information despite the loss of the block error correction. Furthermore, because of the packet ECC encoding, it may be possible to reduce the strength, and thus, the length of the block ECC code.
The inventor has also realized that by including separate error correction coding for each block of packets and for each packet by itself, a stronger code may be produced than by providing ECC coding for each packet without the coding of blocks of packets. If errors are spread out throughout the group of packets, the packet ECC codes in each packet can handle the relatively few errors in that packet. However, if errors occur in a burst, then most packets will be error-free, while one packet will have more errors than the packet ECC code can correct. In such a case, the block ECC code can correct the burst of errors in the single erroneous packet, and all packets may be utilized.
In the drawing:
a is a block diagram of a portion of a communications system incorporating principles of the present invention; and
b is a packet diagram illustrating the contents of a packet stream communicated by the communications system of
a is a block diagram of a portion of a communications system incorporating principles of the present invention. In
In
An output terminal of the block ECC encoder 20 is coupled to an input terminal of a block ECC decoder 30 via a communications channel, illustrated as a dashed line in
b is a packet diagram useful in understanding the operation of the system illustrated in
The specific embodiment illustrated in
Although a specific application is illustrated in
When this packet stream is transmitted through the channel, it is possible for the data in the packet stream to become corrupted and/or for complete packets to be lost. The block ECC decoder 30 first analyzes the combination of the seven packets and the block ECC code to detect and correct errors in that block (if possible) in a known manner. A stream of error corrected packets, each including data and packet ECC bytes, is produced at the output terminal of the block ECC decoder 30. The packet decoder 40 then analyzes the data and packet ECC bytes in each packet to detect and correct errors in that packet (if possible) in a known manner. A stream of error corrected data extracted from those packets is produced at the output terminal of the packet decoder 40.
In the illustrated embodiment, the 16 byte packet ECC code can correct up to eight byte errors anywhere in the packet (which consists of the 188 bytes in the data field and the packet ECC field). The 64 byte block ECC code can correct up to 32 bytes of errors anywhere in the block (which consists of the 1428 bytes in the seven packets, the eight padding bytes and the 64 bytes of block ECC code). As described above, in a packet data communications system, packets can sometimes disappear between the transmitter and the receiver due to, for example, interference, buffer overflow at a repeater, etc. Loss of a packet, however causes 204 byte errors which is uncorrectable by the block ECC code. However, if the remaining six packets are received, the respective packet ECC codes in each of the packets may be used to correct up to eight byte errors in each of the received packets. These packets, therefore, may be used by the system, even though the block ECC code was ineffective to correct any errors.
Even in the event that all packets are received, the use of hierarchical ECC codes provides additional error correction. The block ECC is used to error correct the block of packets, and each packet is further error corrected by its packet ECC code. One skilled in the art will also note that the illustrated embodiment may be incorporated into the existing standard system (described above) because the block ECC coding remains the same. Only the internal arrangement of each packet is changed.
Although described in the environment of an MPEG digital television broadcast system, one skilled in the art will understand that the present invention may be used in any packet data system, such as a computer interconnection network such as the internet, or a packet switched communications system such as used in digital cellular telephones. Such a system is especially advantageous in packet communications system which use relatively small packets. One skilled in the art will further understand that further error detection and/or correction coding may be concatenated with the error coding of the present invention. For example, any of the known error detection codes, such as parity or CRC may also be appended to each packet to provide an indication of whether the packet is error-free or erroneous.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4364081 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4417339 | Cantarella | Nov 1983 | A |
4447902 | Wilkinson | May 1984 | A |
4716567 | Ito et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4760576 | Sako | Jul 1988 | A |
4796261 | Moriwaki | Jan 1989 | A |
5159452 | Kinoshita et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5392299 | Rhines et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5412667 | Havemose | May 1995 | A |
5450421 | Joo et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5559506 | Leitch | Sep 1996 | A |
5642365 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5677918 | Tran et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5699062 | Widmer | Dec 1997 | A |
5844918 | Kato | Dec 1998 | A |
6006318 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6029266 | Lee | Feb 2000 | A |
6065147 | Pyndiah et al. | May 2000 | A |
6122763 | Pyndiah et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6161209 | Moher | Dec 2000 | A |
6317418 | Raitola et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6397366 | Tanaka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6434719 | Livingston | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453439 | Hattori et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460162 | Buda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499128 | Gerlach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526538 | Hewitt | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542479 | Boudier et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574775 | Chouly | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577813 | Ibaraki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581178 | Kondo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6697984 | Sim et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711704 | Tezuka | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6785733 | Mimura et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799287 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6904095 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
20020129313 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 306 196 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0 663 776 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 928 116 | Jul 1999 | EP |
11088856 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000174819 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000187940 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000 349792 | Dec 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020184590 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |