Patent Grant
10031138
Surface chemistries for biosensors, implantable medical devices, targeted drug/gene delivery carriers, tissue scaffolds, and targeted molecular imaging probes in complex media remain a great challenge due to high nonspecific adsorption and low binding capacity of molecular recognition elements. Currently, few materials have been developed to reduce nonspecific protein adsorption, including poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), mannitol tetraglyme, and zwitterionic polymers. The effectiveness of protein resistant materials relies on their high surface packing densities. Unfortunately, highly dense two-dimensional (2D) polymer films elicit the limitation of a low ligand-binding capacity. At the same time, a three-dimensional (3D) carboxymethylated dextran-based hydrogel binding matrix was previously developed, enabling very high protein loading due to an open polymer structure. However, this open structure only provides weak surface resistance to nonspecific protein adsorption, particularly in complex media such as blood.
Despite the advances in the development polymer films noted above, there is a need for polymer films with precisely controlled architecture for achieving advantageous properties for a variety of applications. The present invention seeks to fulfill this need and provides further related advantages.
In one aspect, the invention provides hierarchical films.
In one embodiment, the film comprises a first layer having a first layer density, wherein the first layer is attached to a substrate; and a second layer having a second layer density, wherein the second layer is attached to the first layer, wherein the first layer density is greater than the second layer density.
In another embodiment, the film comprises a first nonfouling layer (low level of fibrinogen or lysozyme non-specific binding), wherein the first layer is attached to a substrate; and a second layer that can be functionalized to include recognition elements, wherein the second layer is attached to the first layer.
In certain embodiments, the second layer of the films of the invention further comprises a plurality of recognition elements. Representative recognition elements include peptides, proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules. In certain embodiments, the recognition element is an antibody or antibody fragment, or a DNA or an RNA.
In certain embodiments, the first layer comprises a plurality of polymers. In one embodiment, the first layer is a polymer brush. In certain embodiments, the first layer is a nonfouling layer. In certain embodiments, the first layer has a fibrinogen binding level less than about 30 ng/cm2. In other embodiments, the first layer has a lysozyme binding level less than about 30 ng/cm2. In certain embodiments, the first layer comprises a first polymer layer having a first polymer density, and the first polymer layer comprises a plurality of first polymers, each of the first polymers having a first end and a second end, wherein each first polymer is attached to a substrate through its first end. In certain embodiments, the first polymers are grafted from the substrate. In other embodiments, the first polymers are grafted to the substrate.
In certain embodiments, the second layer comprises a plurality of polymers. In certain of these embodiments, the second layer is a crosslinked layer (e.g., a hydrogel). In certain embodiments, the second layer comprises a second polymer layer having a second polymer density, wherein the second polymer layer comprises a plurality of second polymers, each of the second polymers having a first end and a second end, wherein each second polymer is attached to a first polymer through its first end. In certain embodiments, the second polymers are grafted from the first polymers. In other embodiments, the second polymers are grafted to the first polymers.
The first or second polymers are independently selected from charged polymers and copolymers and non-charged polymers and copolymers. Representative charged polymers and copolymers include zwitterionic polymers and copolymers and mixed charge copolymers. Representative zwitterionic polymers include polysulfobetaines, polycarboxybetaines, polyphosphobetaines, peptides, and peptoids. Representative non-charged polymers include alkylene oxide polymers and copolymers (e.g., PEGs), polysaccharide polymers and copolymers (e.g., dextrans), acrylamide polymers and copolymers (e.g., acrylamide and methacrylamide polymers and copolymers), and hydroxy-terminal polymers and copolymers (e.g., HEMA and HPMA).
In certain embodiments, the films of the invention include one or more additional layers attached to the second layer.
In the films of the invention, the first layer is attached to a substrate surface. Suitable surfaces include metal and metal oxide surfaces, ceramic surfaces, synthetic and natural polymeric surfaces, glass surfaces, fiber glass surfaces, silicon/silica surfaces, carbon-based material surfaces, cell surfaces, and macromolecule surfaces (e.g., protein, DNAs, lipids). Representative substrates include diagnostic devices, medical devices, separation devices, targeting delivery carriers, tissue scaffolds, and marine devices.
In another aspect, methods for making the films of the invention are provided. In one embodiment, the method includes forming a first layer having a first layer density on a substrate; and forming a second layer on the first layer, the second layer having a second density, wherein the first layer density is greater than the second layer density. In certain embodiments, the method further comprises attaching a plurality of recognition elements to the second layer. In other embodiments, the method further comprises attaching one or more additional layers to the second layer.
In certain embodiments, forming the first layer comprises grafting first polymers from the substrate. In other embodiments, forming the first layer comprises grafting first polymers to the substrate.
In certain embodiments, forming the second layer comprises grafting the second polymers from the first polymers. In other embodiments, forming the second layer comprises grafting the second polymers to the first polymers.
In a further aspect, the invention provides methods for determining the presence of an analyte in a sample. In one embodiment, the method comprises contacting a sample with a film of the invention comprising one or more recognition elements, wherein the recognition element has a specific binding affinity for the analyte, and interrogating the film to determine whether the analyte has bound to the film.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides hierarchical films with structurally regulated functionalities through the integration of two-dimensional and three-dimensional structures to achieve ultra low nonspecific binding and high loading of molecular recognition elements. Methods for making and using the films are also provided.
As used herein, the term “hierarchical” refers to the layered architecture of the films, where the individual layers have specific functions and properties.
The present invention provides dual-functional nonfouling films, methods for making dual-functional nonfouling films, and devices that include dual-functional nonfouling films. The dual-functional films of the invention are films that are nonfouling (e.g., ultra low-fouling) surfaces that resist non-specific protein adsorption and cell adhesion. The dual-functional films of the invention also include covalently coupled recognition elements (e.g., target binding partners) that impart specific binding activity to the surfaces. Because the dual-functional films of the invention are nonfouling and include immobilized recognition elements, these films are useful in any method or device that requires sensitive specific binding or specific binding measurement and at the same time requires resistance to non-specific protein binding and cell adhesion. The dual-functional films of the invention are useful in medical diagnostic applications, biomaterials and tissue engineering, and drug delivery.
Dual-Functional Films
In one aspect, the invention provides a film that includes two layers: a first layer having a first layer density and attached to a substrate; and a second layer having second density and attached to the first layer. In certain embodiments, the density of the first layer is greater than the density of the second layer. In other embodiments, the film comprises a first nonfouling layer (low level of fibrinogen or lysozyme non-specific binding as described below), wherein the first layer is attached to a substrate; and a second layer that can be functionalized to include recognition elements, wherein the second layer is attached to the first layer. In preferred embodiments, the second layer of the films of the invention includes a plurality of recognition elements.
The terms “film,” “coating,” and “surface coating” are used interchangeably and refer the constructs of the invention having two layers as described above.
In certain embodiments, the first layer is a nonfouling layer. As used herein, the terms “nonfouling” and “ultra low fouling” refers to layers and films of the invention that resist or prevent non-specific protein adsorption and cell adhesion. Non-specific protein adsorption can be measured by determining the level of protein (e.g., fibrinogen or lysozyme) adsorption that adsorbs to the surface per unit area.
The first layer of the films of the invention adsorb less than about 30 ng/cm2 fibrinogen or lysozyme. In one embodiment, the first layer has a fibrinogen or lysozyme adsorption less than about 10 ng/cm2; in one embodiment, the fibrinogen or lysozyme adsorption is less than about 5 ng/cm2; in one embodiment, the fibrinogen or lysozyme adsorption is less than about 3 ng/cm2; and in one embodiment, the fibrinogen or lysozyme adsorption is less than about 0.3 ng/cm2.
The nonfouling function of the film is imparted to the first layer by the materials of the first layer coupled to the surface. These materials include zwitterionic materials. Suitable materials useful in making the surfaces include the polymers and copolymers described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,879,444 (Superlow-Fouling Sulfobetaine and Carboxybetaine Materials and Related Methods) and US 20090259015 (Mixed Charge Copolymers and Hydrogels), each expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Methods for measuring protein adsorption (fibrinogen) are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,879,444, expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The thickness of the first layer of the film of the invention can vary depending on the intended use of the film. In certain embodiments, the first layer has a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm. In certain other embodiments, the first layer has a thickness from about 1 to about 20 nm.
The second layer of the films of the invention is attached to the film's first layer and has a density less than the density of the first layer. In certain embodiments, recognition elements are attached to the second layer to render the films dual-functional films. In these embodiments, the second layer includes materials having a functional group or groups suitably reactive to immobilize recognition elements (e.g., proteins such as antibodies). Representative functional groups for these dual-functional materials include carboxylic acid groups and amino groups, among others. As described in detail below, in one embodiment, the dual-functional materials are zwitterionic materials that can be attached (e.g., covalently coupled) to a surface and that have terminal carboxylic acid groups. These terminal carboxylic acid groups can be activated for coupling to one or more amino groups present in a biomolecule. In this embodiment, the carboxylic acid groups may be converted to active esters (e.g., N-hydroxysuccinimide esters) and then reacted with one or more amino groups (e.g., amino group of a lysine residue of a protein) to form an amide bond thereby immobilizing the protein to the surface to provide a dual-functional film of the invention.
In the second layer, the materials can include carboxylic acid groups and certain of these carboxylic acid groups are available for further chemical reaction, specifically the immobilization of recognition elements (i.e., target binding partners) to the materials and, therefore, the film. In certain embodiments, recognition elements having available amino groups (—NH2) can be covalently coupled to the materials' available carboxylic acid groups to immobilize the recognition element through stable amide linkages (—CONH—). In the practice of the invention, a portion of the materials having available carboxylic acid groups are activated for coupling and then covalently coupled to the recognition elements to provide immobilized recognition elements. The extent of recognition elements immobilized to the films of the invention can be readily controlled through the reaction conditions (e.g., extent of carboxyl group activation and concentration and amount of recognition elements exposed to the activated layer for immobilization. Schematic illustrations of representative nonfouling films of the invention having immobilized recognition elements are shown in
The thickness of the second layer of the film of the invention can also vary depending on the intended use of the film. In certain embodiments, the second layer has a thickness from about 10 nm to about 300 μm. In certain other embodiments, the second layer has a thickness from about 100 nm to about 100 μm.
It will be appreciated that films with additional layers (e.g., third, fourth, fifth layers) are within the scope of the invention. The additional layers can be formed on the two-layer film described herein. For example, the third layer can be formed on the second layer (e.g., by “graft from” or “graft to” techniques). Subsequent layers can be similarly formed.
Polymer Films
Representative films of the invention include polymer films. As used herein, the term “polymer film” refers to a film of the invention in which the first layer is a polymer layer, the second layer is a polymer layer, or the first and second layers are polymer layers.
In certain embodiments, the first layer comprises a plurality of polymers. For these embodiments, the first layer is a polymer layer. Suitable polymers layers include polymer brushes. As used herein, the term “polymer brush” refers to an assembly of polymer chains in which an end of each polymer chain is attached to a substrate surface.
The second layer may also comprise a plurality of polymers. For these embodiments, the second layer is a polymer layer. In certain of these embodiments, the second layer is a crosslinked polymer layer and, in certain of these embodiments, the second layer is a hydrogel.
As noted above, in certain embodiments, the films of the invention, the density of the first layer is greater than the density of the second layer.
As noted above, in certain embodiments, the first layer of the films of the invention have a density greater than the density of the second layer. As used herein, the term “density” has its common meaning: mass per unit volume. The greater density of the first layer of films of the invention is readily apparent from the schematic illustrations of representative films in
The density of layers can be determined by refractive index or swelling ratio as described herein. Representative films of the invention have a dry film refractive index from about 1.40 to about 1.57 RIU. In one embodiment, the dry film refractive index is greater than about 1.45 RIU. In another embodiment, the dry film refractive index is greater than about 1.48 RIU. In a further embodiment, the dry film refractive index is greater than about 1.50 RIU. Dry film refractive index is measured as described in Example 4. See also
In other embodiments, the film comprises a first nonfouling layer (low level of fibrinogen or lysozyme non-specific binding), wherein the first layer is attached to a substrate; and a second layer that can be functionalized to include recognition elements, wherein the second layer is attached to the first layer. In this embodiment, the first layer need not have a density that is greater than the second layer.
For certain polymer films of the invention, the first layer comprises a first polymer layer having a first polymer density, and the first polymer layer comprises a plurality of first polymers, each of the first polymers having a first end and a second end, wherein each first polymer is attached to a substrate through its first end.
Similarly, for certain polymer films of the invention, the second layer comprises a second polymer layer having a second polymer density, and the second polymer layer comprises a plurality of second polymers, each of the second polymers having a first end and a second end, wherein each second polymer is attached to a first polymer's second end through the second polymer's first end.
In certain embodiments, the polymer film of the invention includes a first layer comprising a first polymer layer having a first polymer density, the first polymer layer comprising a plurality of first polymers, each of the first polymers having a first end and a second end, wherein each first polymer is attached to a substrate through its first end; and a second layer comprising a second polymer layer having a second polymer density, wherein the second polymer layer comprises a plurality of second polymers, each of the second polymers having a first end and a second end, wherein each second polymer is attached to a first polymer's second end through the second polymer's first end.
As described above, the polymers are attached end to end (first polymer first end attached to the substrate, and first polymer second end attached to second polymer first end), it will be appreciated that the polymers need not be attached end to end. In certain embodiments the polymers can be attached through attachment sites that are not at the polymer end (terminus). The attachment sites can be near the polymer end or, for example, near the middle of the polymer.
In certain embodiments, the first polymers are grafted from the substrate surface. As used herein, the term “grafted from” refers to an attachment method in which the polymer is formed from the substrate. In this embodiment, each of the first polymers are formed by polymerization from the substrate. Suitable polymerization methods include free radical polymerization, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reverse addition fragment transfer (RAFT), photoiniferter-mediated polymerization (PIMP), and condensation/ring opening polymerization.
In other embodiments, the first polymers are grafted to the substrate surface. As used herein, the term “grafted to” refers to an attachment method in which the first polymer is attached to the substrate surface. In this embodiment, each of the first polymers are first formed and then attached to the substrate surface. The nature of the attachment of the first polymer to the substrate surface is not critical; the attachment site of each of the first polymer and substrate is suitably reactive to the other. In certain embodiments, the first polymer is attached to the substrate surface by click chemistry. See, for example, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11%3C2004::AID-ANIE2004%3E3.0.CO;2-5/full. In other embodiments, the first polymer is attached to the substrate surface by thiol-ene chemistry. See, for example, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.200903924/full. In certain embodiments, non-covalent association (e.g., ionic, hydrophobic, hydrogen bonding, or mechanical methods such as entanglement) are effective graft to methods.
In certain embodiments, the second polymers are grafted from the first polymers. This refers to an attachment method in which the second polymer is formed from the first polymer. In this embodiment, each of the second polymers are formed by polymerization from a first polymer. Suitable polymerization methods include free radical polymerization, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reverse addition fragment transfer (RAFT), photoiniferter-mediated polymerization (PIMP), and condensation/ring opening polymerization.
In other embodiments, the second polymers are grafted to the first polymers. This refers to an attachment method in which the second polymer is attached to the first polymer. In this embodiment, each of the second polymers are first formed and then attached to a first polymer. The nature of the attachment of the second polymer to the first polymer is not critical; the attachment site of each of the first and second polymers is suitably reactive to the other. In certain embodiments, the second polymer is attached to the first polymer by click chemistry. In other embodiments, the second polymer is attached to the first polymer by thiol-ene chemistry. As noted above, in certain embodiments, non-covalent association (e.g., ionic, hydrophobic, hydrogen bonding, or mechanical methods such as entanglement) are effective graft to methods.
In the above methods, the second polymer may be attached to the first polymer by covalent coupling the second polymer to the first polymer.
Graft from ATRP and PIMP methods for making films of the invention are described below and in Examples 1-3.
The specific polymers making up the first and second layers is not critical so long as the properties of each layer are maintained as described above. Suitable first and second polymers include charged polymers and copolymers and non-charged polymers and copolymers. Suitable charged polymers include zwitterionic polymers and copolymers and mixed charge copolymers. Suitable non-charged polymers and copolymers include alkylene oxide polymers and copolymers, polysaccharide polymers and copolymers (dextrans), acrylamide polymers and copolymers, and hydroxy-terminal polymers and copolymers (HEMA). Representative zwitterionic polymers useful in the first and second layers include polysulfobetaines, polycarboxybetaines, polyphosphobetaines, peptides, and peptoids. Representative zwitterionic polymers useful in the second layer include polycarboxybetaines and mixed charge peptides.
In some embodiments, the first polymers are selected from polysulfobetaines, polycarboxybetaines, polyphosphobetaines, and peptides, and the second polymers are selected from polycarboxybetaines and peptides. In other embodiments, the first polymers are polycarboxybetaines and the second polymers are polycarboxybetaines.
In certain embodiments, the first and/or second polymers of the first and second layers of the polymer film of the invention are zwitterionic polymers. In the practice of the invention, these polymers may be prepared by polymerization of a zwitterionic (or latent zwitterionic) monomer.
Representative zwitterionic first or second polymers have the formula:
PB-[L1-(N+(R2)(R3))-L2-AO2−X−]n(M+)n
wherein
PB is the polymer backbone having n pendant zwitterionic groups;
R2 and R3 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, and aryl, or taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a cationic center;
L1 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center [N+(R5)(R6)] to the polymer backbone;
L2 is a linker that covalently couples the anionic center [A(═O)—O−] to the cationic center;
A is C, S, SO, P, or PO;
M+ is an optional counter ion associated with the (A=O)O− anionic center;
X− is an optional counter ion associated with the cationic center; and
n is an integer from 1 to about 10,000.
Representative zwitterionic first or second polymers comprise a plurality of repeating units, each repeating unit having the formula:
wherein
R1 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, fluorine, trifluoromethyl, C1-C6 alkyl, and C6-C12 aryl groups;
R2 and R3 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, and aryl, or taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a cationic center;
L1 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center [N+(R5)(R6)] to the polymer backbone [—(CH2—CR4)n—];
L2 is a linker that covalently couples the anionic center [A(═O)—O−] to the cationic center;
A is C, S, SO, P, or PO;
M+ is an optional counter ion associated with the (A=O)—O− anionic center;
X− is an optional counter ion associated with the cationic center; and
n is an integer from 1 to about 10,000.
In one embodiment, the polymer is a polycarboxybetaine. Suitable polycarboxybetaines can be prepared from one or more monomers selected from the group consisting of carboxybetaine acrylates, carboxybetaine acrylamides, carboxybetaine vinyl compounds, carboxybetaine epoxides, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the monomer is carboxybetaine methacrylate. Representative monomers for making carboxybetaine polymers useful in the invention include carboxybetaine methacrylates, such as 2-carboxy-N,N-dimethyl-N-(2′-methacryloyloxyethyl) ethanaminium inner salt; carboxybetaine acrylates; carboxybetaine acrylamides; carboxybetaine vinyl compounds; carboxybetaine epoxides; and other carboxybetaine compounds with hydroxyl, isocyanates, amino, or carboxylic acid groups. In one embodiment, the polymer is a poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) (poly(CBMA)). In another embodiment, the polymer is a poly(carboxybetaine acrylate) (poly(CBAA)).
In other embodiments, the first and/or second polymers of the first and second layers of the polymer film of the invention are mixed charge copolymers.
As used herein, the term “mixed charge copolymer” refers to a copolymer having a polymer backbone, a plurality of positively charged repeating units, and a plurality of negatively charged repeating units.
The mixed charge copolymer includes a plurality of positively charged repeating units, and a plurality of negatively charged repeating units. In one embodiment, the mixed charge copolymer is substantially electronically neutral. As used herein, the term “substantially electronically neutral” refers to a copolymer that imparts advantageous nonfouling properties to the copolymer. In one embodiment, a substantially electronically neutral copolymer is a copolymer having a net charge of substantially zero (i.e., a copolymer about the same number of positively charged repeating units and negatively charged repeating units). In one embodiment, the ratio of the number of positively charged repeating units to the number of the negatively charged repeating units is from about 1:1.1 to about 1:0.5. In one embodiment, the ratio of the number of positively charged repeating units to the number of the negatively charged repeating units is from about 1:1.1 to about 1:0.7. In one embodiment, the ratio of the number of positively charged repeating units to the number of the negatively charged repeating units is from about 1:1.1 to about 1:0.9. In the practice of the invention, these copolymers may be prepared by polymerization of an ion-pair comonomer.
In one embodiment, the copolymers are prepared by copolymerization of suitable polymerizable ion pair comonomers.
Representative ion-pair comonomers useful in the invention have the formulas:
CH2═C(R4)-L3-N+(R6)(R7)(R8)X−
CH2═C(R5)-L4-A2(═O)—O−M+
Representative mixed charge first or second polymers have the formula:
PB-[L3-(N+(R6)(R7)(R8)X−]n[L4-A2O2−M+]p
wherein
PB is the polymer backbone having n pendant cationic groups and p pendant anionic groups;
R6, R7, and R8 are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, and aryl, or taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a cationic center;
A(═O)—OM) is an anionic center, wherein A is C, S, SO, P, or PO, and M+ is an optional counter ion;
L3 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center [N+(R6)(R7)(R8)] to the polymer backbone;
L4 is a linker that covalently couples the anionic center [A(═O)—OM] to the polymer backbone;
X− is an optional counter ion associated with the cationic center;
n is an integer from 1 to about 10,000; and
p is an integer from 1 to about 10,000.
Representative mixed charge first or second polymers comprise a plurality of repeating units, the copolymer having the formula:
wherein
R4 and R5 are independently selected from hydrogen, fluorine, trifluoromethyl, C1-C6 alkyl, and C6-C12 aryl groups;
R6, R7, and R8 are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, and aryl, or taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a cationic center;
A(═O)—OM) is an anionic center, wherein A is C, S, SO, P, or PO, and M+ is an optional counterion;
L3 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center [N+(R6)(R7)(R8)] to the polymer backbone;
L4 is a linker that covalently couples the anionic center [A(═O)—OM] to the polymer backbone;
X− is an optional counter ion associated with the cationic center;
n is an integer from 1 to about 10,000; and
p is an integer from 1 to about 10,000.
As noted above, in certain embodiments, M+ and X− are optional as the cationic center and the anionic center provide an inner salt.
For the above formulas illustrating polymer repeating units, * represents the point at which each repeating unit is covalently linked to the next.
In the above formulas, the polymer backbone (PB) may be any one of a variety of backbones known to those of skill in the art (e.g., acrylic acid, alkylacrylic acid, such as methacrylic acid; acrylamide, alkylacrylamide such as methacrylamide). The nature of the polymer backbone is not critical. Suitable backbones include vinyl backbones (i.e., —C(R′)(R″)—C(R′″)(R″″)—, where R′, R″, R′″, and R″″ are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, and aryl) derived from vinyl monomers (e.g., acrylate, methacrylate, acrylamide, methacrylamide, styrene). Other suitable backbones include polyamide backbones, such as poly(amino acid) backbones.
In the above formulas, N+ is the cationic center. In certain embodiments, the cationic center is a quaternary ammonium (e.g., N bonded to L1, R2, R3, and L2). In addition to ammonium, other useful cationic centers (e.g., R2 and R3 taken together with N) include imidazolium, triazaolium, pyridinium, morpholinium, oxazolidinium, pyrazinium, pyridazinium, pyrimidinium, piperazinium, and pyrrolidinium.
R1-R8 are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, and aryl groups. Representative alkyl groups include C1-C10 straight chain and branched alkyl groups. In certain embodiments, the alkyl group is further substituted with one of more substituents including, for example, an aryl group (e.g., —CH2C6H5, benzyl). In one embodiment, R2 and R3, and R6, R7, and R8, are methyl. In one embodiment, R1-R8 are methyl. Representative aryl groups include C6-C12 aryl groups including, for example, phenyl. For certain embodiments of the above formulas, R2 and R3, and/or R6, R7, and R8 are taken together with N+ form the cationic center. In one embodiment, R7 and R8 are C1-C3 alkyl. In another embodiment, R6, R7, and R8 are C1-C3 alkyl.
L1 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center to the polymer backbone. In certain embodiments, L1 includes a functional group (e.g., ester or amide) that couples the remainder of L1 to the polymer backbone (or polymerizable moiety for the monomers). In addition to the functional group, L1 can include an C1-C20 alkylene chain. Representative L1 groups include —C(═O)O—(CH2)n— and —C(═O)NH—(CH2)n—, where n is 1-20 (e.g., n=2).
L2 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center to the anionic group. L2 can be a C1-C20 alkylene chain. Representative L2 groups include —(CH2)n—, where n is 1-20 (e.g., 1, 3, or 5).
L3 is a linker that covalently couples the cationic center to the polymer backbone. In certain embodiments, L3 includes a functional group (e.g., ester or amide) that couples the remainder of L3 to the polymer backbone (or polymerizable moiety for the monomers). In addition to the functional group, L3 can include an C1-C20 alkylene chain. Representative L3 groups include —C(═O)O—(CH2)n— and —C(═O)NH—(CH2)n—, where n is 1-20 (e.g., n=2). In certain embodiments, L3 is —C(═O)O—(CH2)n—, wherein n is 1-6.
L4 is a linker that covalently couples the anionic group to the polymer backbone. In certain embodiments, L4 is a C1-C20 alkylene chain. Representative L4 groups include —(CH2)n—, where n is 1-20 (e.g., 1, 3, or 5).
Representative alkyl groups include C1-C30 straight chain and branched alkyl groups. In certain embodiments, the alkyl group is further substituted with one of more substituents including, for example, an aryl group (e.g., —CH2C6H5, benzyl).
Representative aryl groups include C6-C12 aryl groups including, for example, phenyl including substituted phenyl groups (e.g., benzoic acid).
X− is the counter ion associated with the cationic center. The counter ion can be the counter ion that results from the synthesis of the cationic polymers or the monomers (e.g., Cl−, Br−, I−). The counter ion that is initially produced from the synthesis of the cationic center can also be exchanged with other suitable counter ions. Representative hydrophobic counter ions include carboxylates, such as benzoic acid and fatty acid anions (e.g., CH3(CH2)nCO2− where n=1-19); alkyl sulfonates (e.g., CH3(CH2)nSO3− where n=1-19); salicylate; lactate; bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide anion (N−(SO2CF3)2); and derivatives thereof. Other counter ions also can be chosen from chloride, bromide, iodide, sulfate; nitrate; perchlorate (ClO4); tetrafluoroborate (BF4); hexafluorophosphate (PF6); trifluoromethylsulfonate (SO3CF3); and derivatives thereof. Other suitable counter ions include salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid), benzoate, and lactate.
In certain embodiments, A is C or SO.
In certain embodiments, n is an integer from 5 to about 5,000.
In one embodiment, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8 are methyl, L3 is —C(═O)O—(CH2)2—, and L4 is —CH2—, A1 is C or SO, and n is an integer from 5 to about 5,000.
For the zwitterionic polymers and mixed charge copolymers useful in the invention, the degree of polymerization (DP or n), number average molecular weight (Mn), and the ratio of weight average and number average molecular weights (Mw/Mn⋅), also known as polydispersity index, can vary. In one embodiment, the polymers have a degree of polymerization (n) from 1 to about 10,000. In one embodiment, n is from about 10 to about 5,000. In another embodiment, n is from about 100 to about 3,500. In one embodiment, the polymers have a number average molecular weight (Mn) of from about 200 to about 2,000,000 Da. In one embodiment, Mn is from about 2,000 to about 100,000 Da. In another embodiment, Mn is from about 20,000 to about 80,000 Da. In one embodiment, the polymers have a ratio of weight average and number average molecular weight (Mw/Mn⋅) of from about 1.0 to about 2.0. In one embodiment, Mw/Mn⋅ is from about 1.1 to about 1.5. In another embodiment, Mw/Mn⋅ is from about 1.2 to about 2.0.
Recognition Elements
As noted above, in the films of the invention, the second layer includes a plurality of recognition elements. The terms “recognition elements” and “target binding partners” are used interchangeably.
The binding affinity of a target molecule toward to the surface results from the target binding partners immobilized on the surface. The target binding partner and the target molecule, each termed a binding pair member, form a binding pair. Each binding pair member is a molecule that specifically binds the other member. In one embodiment, the target binding partner has affinity to a target molecule with Kd less than about 10−8.
A binding pair member can be any suitable molecule including, without limitation, proteins, peptides, proteins, poly- or oligo-saccharides, glycoproteins, lipids and lipoproteins, and nucleic acids, as well as synthetic organic or inorganic molecules having a defined bioactivity, such as an antibiotic, anti-inflammatory agent, an enzyme substrate, or a cell adhesion mediator (i.e., a small molecule).
Examples of proteins that can be immobilized on the surfaces of the present invention include ligand-binding proteins, lectins, hormones, receptors, and enzymes. Representative proteins include antibodies (monoclonal, polyclonal, chimeric, single-chain or other recombinant forms) and fragments thereof, their protein/peptide antigens, protein-peptide hormones, streptavidin, avidin, protein A, proteins G, growth factors and their respective receptors, DNA-binding proteins, cell membrane receptors, endosomal membrane receptors, nuclear membrane receptors, neuron receptors, visual receptors, and muscle cell receptors. Representative oligonucleotides that can be immobilized on the surfaces of the present invention include DNA (genomic or cDNA), RNA, antisense, ribozymes, and external guide sequences for RNAase P, and can range in size from short oligonucleotide primers up to entire genes.
Other target binding partners that bind specifically to a target compound include poly- or oligosaccharides on glycoproteins that bind to receptors, for example, the carbohydrate on the ligand for the inflammatory mediators P-selectin and E-selectin, and nucleic acid sequences that bind to complementary sequences, such as ribozymes, antisense, external guide sequences for RNAase P, and aptamers.
In one embodiment, the target binding partner is an antibody, and the target molecule is an antigen against the antibody. In this embodiment, the surface of the invention specifically binds to the antigen and resists non-specific protein adsorption. In one embodiment, the target binding partner is a protein capable of promoting cell adhesion, and the target molecule is a cell. In this embodiment, the surface of the invention specifically binds to the cell and resists non-specific protein adsorption and non-specific cell adhesion.
In certain embodiments, the second layer has a recognition element binding level of about 200 to about 1500 ng/cm2.
Film Substrates
A variety of substrate surfaces can be rendered dual-functional using the materials and methods described herein. Representative surfaces that can be rendered dual-functional include metal and metal oxide surfaces, ceramic surfaces, synthetic and natural polymeric surfaces, glass surfaces, fiber glass surface, silicon/silica surfaces, carbon-based material surfaces, protein-based material surfaces, and cell surfaces. Representative natural polymeric surfaces include collagen, fibrins, and other carbohydrate surfaces suitable for the use of tissue engineering. Representative carbon-based material surfaces include carbon fiber, nanotube, and bulky ball surfaces.
Suitable substrates include those substrates useful in medical diagnostic applications such as biosensors, bioprobes, and biomedical devices including in vivo devices; biomaterials and tissue engineering applications, such as membranes for bioprocesses or bioseparation, implantable devices, prosthetics, and tissue scaffolds; and drug delivery applications, such as particles and nanoparticles.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a SPR sensor comprising a film of the invention.
It will be appreciated that the films of the invention have been described as including (i.e., the film comprises) the stated components. It will be appreciated that in certain embodiments, the films of the invention described above include the stated components as well as other components that do not alter the novel and material characteristics properties of the film (i.e., the film consists essentially of). Components that alter the novel and material characteristics of the film include components that adversely affect the films ultra low fouling or the ability of the film to capture target molecules through its recognition elements. It will also be appreciated that in certain embodiments, the films of the invention described above include only the stated components (i.e., the film consists of).
Methods for Making Films
In another aspect of the invention, methods for making the films of the invention are provided. In one embodiment, the method includes forming a first layer having a first layer density on a substrate; and forming a second layer on the first layer, the second layer having a second density, wherein the first layer density is greater than the second layer density. In certain embodiments, further includes a plurality of recognition elements to the second layer.
As noted above, in certain embodiments, the film is a polymer film in which the first, second, or first and second layers comprise a plurality of polymers. In certain embodiments, the first layer is a nonfouling layer and the second layer is effective to specifically bind target agents. In certain embodiments, the first layer comprises a first polymer layer having a first polymer density, and the first polymer layer comprises a plurality of first polymers, wherein each first polymer is attached to a substrate; and the second layer comprises a second polymer layer having a second polymer density, wherein the second polymer layer comprises a plurality of second polymers, wherein each second polymer is attached to a first polymer.
The first layer can be formed by grafting first polymers from the substrate. Grafting the first polymers from the substrate can be accomplished by any one of a variety polymerization methods (e.g., free radical polymerization, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reverse addition fragment transfer (RAFT), photoiniferter-mediated polymerization (PIMP), condensation/ring opening polymerization).
Alternatively, the first layer can be formed by grafting first polymers to the substrate. In these methods, the first polymer can be attached to the substrate by any one of a variety of coupling techniques. In one embodiment, the first polymers are covalently coupled to the substrate by click chemistry. In another embodiment, the first polymers are covalently coupled to the substrate by thiol-ene. It will be appreciated that any coupling technique requires suitably reactive second polymers and first layer components.
For embodiments in which the film is a polymer film, the first polymer may be coupled to the substrate surface through alkylene linkers. The grafting of the polymers onto the surface of the substrate through the alkylene linkers may be via any one of a variety of polymerization methods as described herein. SAMs on substrate surfaces are an excellent platform for surface polymerization. In one embodiment, a radical initiator-terminated self-assembly monolayer (SAM) comprising the alkylene linkers can be formed onto the substrate surface, and the polymers are grafted onto the surface through the radical initiator-terminated self-assembly monolayer. In this method, the substrate surface can be coated with the SAMs terminated with radical initiator, wherein the radical initiators are tethered to the surface through alkylene linkers. The alkylene linkers can be any substituted or unsubstituted alkylene. In one embodiment, the alkylene linker is a C2-C30 alkylene. Polymers are then formed onto the SAMs to provide a layer of nonfouling polymeric coating on the substrate surface. Atom transfer radical polymerization is initiated by the radical initiator at the SAMs terminus.
In one embodiment, a hydroxyl-terminated monolayer having alkylene linkers can be formed onto the substrate surface, which is subsequently converted to a radical initiator terminated monolayer.
Materials and methods for making a single layer polycarboxybetaine film having nonfouling properties and the ability to specifically bind target agents is described in US 2010/0099160 (Dual-Functional Nonfouling Surfaces and Materials), expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The second layer can be formed by grafting second polymers from the first layer. Grafting the second polymers from the first polymers can also be accomplished by any one of a variety polymerization methods (e.g., free radical polymerization, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reverse addition fragment transfer (RAFT), photoiniferter-mediated polymerization (PIMP), condensation/ring opening polymerization). A schematic illustration of representative methods for grafting second polymers to the first layer is shown in
Alternatively, the second layer can be formed by grafting second polymers to the first layer. In these methods, the second polymer can be attached to the first layer by any one of a variety of coupling techniques. In one embodiment, the second polymers are covalently coupled to the first layer by click chemistry. In another embodiment, the second polymers are covalently coupled to the first layer by thiol-ene. It will be appreciated that any coupling technique requires suitably reactive second polymers and first layer components.
It will be appreciated that films with additional layers (e.g., third, fourth, or fifth layers) are within the scope of the invention. The additional layers can be formed on the two-layer film described herein. For example, the third layer can be formed on the second layer (e.g., by “graft from” or “graft to” techniques). Subsequent layers can be similarly formed.
The present invention provides methods for modifying the second layer to provide a surface having affinity toward a target molecule. In one embodiment, the method for modifying a surface, includes covalently coupling a plurality of target binding partners (i.e., recognition elements) to the second layer. In certain embodiments, an amide linkage is formed between the polymers and the target binding partners. For polymer films that include carboxylic acid groups (e.g., polycarboxybetaines), covalently coupling the plurality of target binding partners to the plurality of polymers includes converting a portion of carboxylic acid groups to activated esters and reacting the activated esters with target binding partners having amino groups. For polymers that have been modified to include available amino groups, covalently coupling the plurality of target binding partners to the plurality of polymers includes converting a portion of carboxylic acid groups of the target binding partners to activated esters and reacting the activated esters with the polymers of the surface having available amino groups. In one embodiment, the activated esters are N-hydroxysuccinimide esters. Suitable target binding partners include those described in detail above with regard to the films of the invention.
As noted above, the carboxylic acid groups of the polymers may be activated by forming activated intermediate groups for further coupling with the amino groups of the biomolecule. Any activated form of carboxylic acid groups may be used in the present invention. The representative activated intermediate groups include carbodiimides, carbonyldiimidazoles, uranium salts, isothiocyanates, isocyanates, acyl azides, N-succinimidyl esters (NHS esters), sulfonyl chloride, aldehydes, epoxides arylating groups, imido esters, and anhydrides. In one embodiment, O—(N-succinimidyl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate (TSTU) is used to convert the carboxylic acid groups on the polymers to activated uronium salts. In another embodiment, carbodiimides and N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS coupling chemistry) are used to convert the carboxylic acid groups on the polymers to activated N-hydroxysuccinimide esters.
In one embodiment, the carboxylic acid groups were converted to activated NHS esters by treating the carboxylic acid groups with N-bromo succinimide (NHS) and N-ethyl-N′-(3-diethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) under acidic conditions (e.g., pH 2.5 to 6). The activated NHS esters were coupled with the amino groups of the target binding partner forming amide bonds under basic conditions (e.g., pH 7.4 to 11).
The preparation of representative films of the invention is described in Examples 1-3.
Methods for measuring refractive index and swelling ratio for representative films of the invention are described in Examples 4 and 5, respectively.
Methods for Detecting the Presence of an Analyte Using the Film of the Invention
In another aspect, the invention provides methods for determining the presence of an analyte in a sample. The method utilizes film of the invention comprising a plurality of recognition elements. In one embodiment, the method includes contacting a sample with a film of the invention comprising a plurality of recognition elements, wherein each recognition element has a specific binding affinity for the analyte; and interrogating the film to determine whether the analyte has bound to the film. The film can include one or more different recognition elements for the detection of one or more analytes. The film can be interrogated by any method that provides an indication of analyte binding to the film.
Representative films and methods for making and using the films are described below.
Representative Polymer Films
In one aspect, the invention provides a polymer film having two layers (i.e., a hierarchical architecture) prepared from two distinct surface-initiated techniques. These “graft from” techniques are based on controlled “living” radical polymerizations and provide polymer brushes having controlled chemical composition, film thickness, and architecture. As shown in
Due to the dual functionality of poly(carboxybetaine) (pCB) films, a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor with a pCB film was used for demonstrating the novel hierarchical architecture. Surface-tethered pCB brushes formed by both SI-ATRP and SI-PIMP achieve excellent resistance to nonspecific protein adsorption in the presence of complex media, such undiluted human blood serum and plasma, to fouling levels below 5 ng cm−2. These fouling levels can be maintained following the immobilization of around 250 ng cm−2 of antibody using conventional 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) coupling chemistry under biologically friendly conditions. However, this functionalization level only corresponds to an IgG monolayer. The pCB-based polymer films (platforms) of the invention with hierarchical structures on a SPR sensor surface provide sensitive quantification of IgG immobilization, antigen binding, and nonspecific protein adsorption.
As shown in
In contrast to SI-ATRP, SI-PIMP releases capped species from the polymer chains during polymerization, primarily due to bimolecular termination. This irreversible termination significantly hampers future polymer growth. Therefore, in order to control the chain density of the second layer via SI-PIMP, a “regeneration” approach was adopted in which the addition of a deactivator, tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TED), was able to preserve the end-capped photoiniferter groups on the grafted polymers for re-growth of the second layer with controlled grafting density. SPR gold substrates were first modified with the photoiniferter (N,N-(diethylamino)-dithiocarbamoylbenzyl(trimethyoxy)-thiol (DTCA)) to form SAMs. Similarly to SI-ATRP, the first layer for SI-PIMP was also synthesized in 100% methanol to form a highly dense and thin film. Reactions were conducted using a 30 min UV irradiation and the resulting film thicknesses are shown in Table 1. The first layer thicknesses prepared with 2 μM TED was comparable to that without TED (11.1±0.6 nm). Subsequently, the films were re-initiated in a 90% water/methanol solution resulting in TED treated films with greater thicknesses than those made without, reflecting the ability of TED for preserving the reactive photoiniferter end groups and thereby maintaining the “living” characteristic of SI-PIMP.
The thicknesses of representative films prepared via SI-ATRP and SI-PIMP with and without treatment to capped species are compared in Table 1.
Functionalization and fouling tests were monitored in situ using a custom-built SPR sensor with wavelength modulation (see representative sensorgrams in
The protein fouling levels on one-layer films and hierarchical pCB films before and after IgG functionalization were tested by flowing undiluted blood serum or plasma (
Solutions containing TSH antigen were flowed over the functionalized surfaces to evaluate the antigen detection ability (
SI-PIMP Methods
In one embodiment, the invention provides a polymer film having two layers (i.e., a high density ultra low fouling first layer and a low density second layer suitable for presenting recognition elements) prepared via surface initiated photoiniferter-mediated polymerization (SI-PIMP) techniques.
Zwitterionic polycarboxybetaine acrylamine (pCB)-based platforms with a two-layer structure for ultra low fouling and high protein loading properties were prepared. The first pCB layer with a high packing density prepared under a water-free condition serves as a protective layer to resist nonspecific adsorption from complex media. The second pCB layer with a low packing density is used to achieve high protein immobilization. Addition of tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TED) and the water content in the reaction were varied to regulate polymer chain density and length, respectively, for the second pCB layer. The in situ modification of pCB films with anti-human thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) IgG molecules and the detection of TSH antigens were employed to demonstrate high protein immobilization and high antigen detection capabilities of this two-layer structure. Undiluted blood plasma was used to test the nonfouling properties of this system. Nonspecific and specific interactions were monitored by a surface plasmon resonance sensor.
In one embodiment, the two-layer structured pCB film was prepared by (i) growing a densely-packed first pCB brush under a water-free polymerization condition, (ii) adjusting the surface density of the “living” capping moieties on the first pCB layer by adding the TED molecules, and (iii) promoting the chain growth of the second pCB layer via water-accelerated polymerization. The growth of polymer brushes was monitored using ellipsometer. The protein loading on the structured pCB films was investigated by conjugating anti-human thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) antibodies through EDC/NHS coupling chemistry, followed by flowing the TSH antigens for estimating the bioactivities. The non-fouling properties of the platforms before and after antibody functionalization were realized by challenging with undiluted human blood plasma.
Although this pCB platform has shown great success to resist nonspecific protein adsorption from complex media, relatively low antibody loading, similar to all 2-dimensional (2D) surface platforms, limits the sensor response to analyte binding. Owing to the high packing density of the brush film, such surfaces can merely achieve an antibody binding capacity of only 250 ng cm−2 (corresponding to an IgG monolayer) (
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a two-layer structured binding platform that incorporates a first highly dense pCB layer to achieve ultra-low fouling and a second “loose” pCB layer to achieve a high antibody binding capacity (
Surface-initiated photoiniferter-mediated polymerization can be used for preparing surface-tethered pCB films. This polymerization technique poses advantages of simple experimental process, fast reaction rate, and large-scaled surface polymerization, which make an attractive approach for tailoring surface properties. In addition, this technique enables to control light exposure spatially and temporally for creating multidimensional structures regardless of types of monomers. The pCB chains were grown from a self-assembled monolayer comprising of thiolated photoiniferter (N,N-(diethylamino)-dithiocarbamoylbenzyl(trimethyoxy)thiol (DTCA)). The photoiniferters provide control over the reaction by maintaining equilibrium between activated propagating chains and dormant chains that are capped by deactivating species, resulting in controlled radical polymerization. However, due to a low concentration of the deactivating radicals, the polymerization favors irreversible termination caused by bimolecular termination. To preserve the “living” capability of the pCB films, the reduction of termination can be accomplished by adding deactivating species, tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TED), to the reaction medium (
The densely-packed first pCB layer was fabricated via photoiniferter-mediated polymerization in 100% methanol. After 30 min UV exposure, the resulting thickness of the pCB was d1st=10.9±0.7 nm. In
In order to re-initiate the second layer of pCB, TED was added to regenerate the initiator during the polymerization for the growth of the first pCB layer in order to prevent the irreversible termination. The concentration of TED was varied from 0 to 50 μM. The growth of the second layers was accomplished with the CB monomer concentration of 0.15 M in the mixed solvent of MeOH:H2O=50:50 for 30 min. In
The IgG modification was conducted through EDC/NHS coupling chemistry and the corresponding binding capacities of surfaces were measured using a SPR sensor.
To further increase the binding capacity, “water-accelerated” polymerization was used to increase the chain length of the second layer for providing large available binding sites for IgG conjugation. As seen in
AFM in the tapping mode was used to examine the surface morphology of the two-layer pCB films before and after IgG functionalization. The image of the pristine pCB film with a scale of 1 μm×1 μm showed featureless morphology, whereas there were enormous bumps observed on the IgG functionalized pCB, as an evidence of the high density of immobilized IgG molecules. Therefore, this approach to build up a hierarchical structure of pCB film enables the accommodation for a large amount of biomolecules through conventional EDC/NHS amine coupling chemistry and possesses possibility to manipulate the chain density of the second pCB layer for customizing specific requirements, such as considerations on ligand and antigen sizes.
For biosensor applications, an appropriate design of bio-interfaces should be capable of improving the sensitivity and specificity of detection. In the following description, the film with “one-layer” structure is referred to the one fabricated in 100% MeOH without TED addition (d1st=10.9±0.7 nm; Γ=262.5±0.8 ng cm−2,
SI-ATRP Methods
In another embodiment, the invention provides a polymer film having two layers (i.e., a high density ultra low fouling first layer and a low density second layer suitable for presenting recognition elements) prepared via surface initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) techniques.
The two-layer architecture for films of the invention for sensing and detection in complex media is shown in
As shown in
Thin (about 10 nm) and highly dense pCB films can be made via SI-ATRP from pure methanol as the solvent can maintain ultra low fouling properties to undiluted serum. The ability to minimize the final thickness of the two-layer film in a swollen in situ environment is crucial for SPR detection. This is due to a rapid decrease in sensitivity as the measured biomolecular interaction gets further from the SPR active gold layer. For this reason, pure methanol was chosen as the condition for the bottom layer. Different reaction times (0.5-24 hrs) were investigated for growing the second block, which used a 50/50 methanol/water solvent. It was found that a 24 hour reaction resulted in the thickest second layer, the highest antibody immobilization, and excellent functionalized and non-functionalized protein resistance to undiluted serum. The response to antigen was similar for all reactions greater than 1 hour, with bioactivity ratios (i.e., the molar ratio of antigen to antibody) all being about 1.0. The 24 hours reaction enabled the same level of antibody immobilization achieved from a single layer grown from a 50% methanol solution. However, the post-functionalized serum non-fouling of the two-layer film (<5 ng/cm2) was better than the single layer film (about 15 ng/cm2) proving the effectiveness of the two-layer architecture. A first layer made using 50% water was also prepared. However, this condition was very difficult to control, even with short reaction times on the order of a few minutes, resulting in the final second layer polymer structure being mostly determined by the rapid polymerization of the bottom layer. Furthermore, simply spiking solutions grown from a first layer of either 50% water or in pure methanol with a high concentration of monomer dissolved in pure water was also not found to be effective.
The affect of azide treatment on the second layer polymer thickness and corresponding antibody immobilization for two different solvent conditions is shown in Table 2 and
The saturated antigen response for azide exposure times of 0, 60, and 120 min for films made using a 10% and 50% water second layer is shown in
The non-specific protein adsorption from undiluted human serum as a function of azide exposure time is shown in
Due to the ability of the water concentration to significantly affect the polymer density of the ATRP reaction, the concentration of water was varied from 0-90% for a one hour azide treatment (the condition which enabled the highest antibody immobilization). The functionalized and non-functionalized serum fouling, antibody immobilization, and antigen response are shown in
The corresponding second block film thicknesses for each condition are shown in Table 3. The two-layer films made from 20-50% water all resulted in excellent non-fouling properties, had the highest level of immobilization, and also had the highest thickness. It is believed that the two-layer films made from 0% water content grow a very small second layer due to the limited solubility of the highly dense first layer polymer brush in pure methanol resulting in few polymer chains actually being reinitiated. Additionally, the significantly low level of immobilization (about 100 ng/cm2) indicates that very few functionalizable groups are accessible. This could mean that physically absorbed polymer is covering the surface, interacting via charged intermolecular interactions, resulting in a significant presence of the hydrophobic acrylamide backbone being exposed on the surface. The 60% water condition resulted in a similar SPR response as for the 10% water case, thus likely being described by the same phenomena (long and dilute chains), but also with an increase in chain-chain termination reactions which reduced the effective area for immobilization and also lead to exposure of the hydrophobic backbone of the polymer. The 90% water result is likely attributed to a significant presence of radical recombination reactions with the same negative consequences as for the film made using 60% water. With an exception of the two extreme endpoints (0% and 90% water), the similar antigen response for the other water concentrations corresponds with the expected results from 2D surfaces, with the 50% case simply having a low rate of diffusion as discussed above. The two endpoints have the expected response for a 2D surface with low antibody immobilization.
In certain embodiments, the films of the invention having two-layer architecture with zwitterionic dual-functional pCB were made via SI-ATRP. Exposing the dense bottom layer to a sodium azide solution to reduce the number of re-initiating sites was effective to double the antibody immobilization all while maintaining ultra low fouling properties to undiluted human serum. Changing the second block polymer density also resulted in a significant increase in the antigen response. These ideal properties of pCB integrated with the two-layer architecture offer the ability to significantly improve detection abilities from undiluted complex media.
Each references cited is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As used here the term “about” means±5 percent of the recited value.
The following examples are provided for the purpose of illustrating, not limiting, the invention.
The Preparation, Characterization, and Properties of Representative Polymer Films: Polycarboxybetaine Films by SI-PIMP and SI-ATRP
In this example, the preparation, characterization, and properties of representative polymer films of the invention, polycarboxybetaine (pCB) films prepared by SI-ATRP, are described.
Materials.
Copper (I) bromide (99.999%), 2,2′-bipyridine (BPY, 99%), tetrahydrofuran (THF), tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TED), methanol, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.01 M phosphate, 0.138 M sodium chloride, 0.0027 M potassium chloride, pH 7.4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Ethanol (200 Proof) was purchased from Decon Laboratories (King of Prussia, Pa.). Sodium carbonate anhydrous was purchased from EMD Chemicals (Darmstadt, Germany). Sodium chloride (NaCl) and ether were purchased from J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, N.J.). Sodium acetate anhydrous was purchased from Fluka (subsidiary of Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.). 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Pooled human serum was purchased from Biochemed Services (Winchester, Va.). Antibody to thyroid stimulating hormone (anti-TSH) and the TSH antigen were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, Mass.). Water used in the experiments was purified using a Millipore water purification system with a minimum resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm.
Preparation of pCB films via SI-ATRP.
Mercaptoundecyl bromoisobutyrate (SI-ATRP initiator) and carboxybetaine acrylamide (CB) monomer were synthesized as described in J. E. Krause, N. D. Brault, L. Y. Li, H. Xue, Y. B. Zhou, S. Y. Jiang, Macromolecules 2011, 44, 9213-9220, and Z. Zhang, H. Vaisocherova, G. Cheng, W. Yang, H. Xue, S. Y. Jiang, Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 2686-2692. SAMs on cleaned SPR chips (Z. Zhang, S. F. Chen, Y. Chang, S. Y. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 10799-10804) of ATRP initiator were formed by soaking overnight in ethanol (0.1 mM). Upon removal, the chips were rinsed with ethanol, THF, ethanol, and then dried and placed in a custom glass tube reactor under nitrogen. In a separate glass tube, CuBr (8.86 mg), 2,2′-bipyridine (57.85 mg), and CB (600 mg) were added and placed under nitrogen. The solids were dissolved in nitrogen purged methanol (4 mL) and transferred to the chips and reacted for 24 hours at 25° C. in a shaker bath. For single layer films, the chips were rinsed with water and stored overnight in PBS. For hierarchical films, the solution was quenched with CuBr2 (275.87 mg) in methanol (4 mL) and then rinsed with methanol, water, and submerged in PBS. The second block was then grown via repeating the above procedure but using a nitrogen purged methanol:water (1:1) and reacting for 3 hours. Termination of bromine groups and replacement with non-reactive azide moieties for reducing the second block polymer density was achieved by submerging the single layer chips in an aqueous azide solution (0.1 M) for 2 hours, removing and rinsing with PBS, water, and then drying for ATRP.
The DTCA photoiniferter was synthesized as described in T. Otsu, Journal of Polymer Science Part a-Polymer Chemistry 2000, 38, 2121-2136. SAMs on cleaned SPR chips (Z. Zhang, S. F. Chen, Y. Chang, S. Y. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 10799-10804) of the photoiniferter were formed by soaking overnight in THF containing DTCA (2 mM) followed by rinsing with THF and drying with a stream of air. For single layers, the photoiniferter modified chip was transferred to a quartz reaction tube along with 170 mg of CB monomer and placed under nitrogen. Nitrogen purged methanol (5 mL) containing TED (2 μM) was transferred to the reaction tube. The photo-polymerization was then conducted for 30 min using a UV lamp (302 nm) coupled with a 280 nm cutoff filter for preventing deterioration of thiol-gold bonds. Following the reaction, the chips were removed and rinsed with water, PBS, and then submerged in PBS. For the hierarchical films, the single layer film was re-initiated using the identical procedure except for the using nitrogen purged methanol:water (10:90) in the absence of TED.
Ellipsometry.
The thickness of the pCB films were determined using an ellipsometer (Model alpha-SE, J. A. Woollam, Lincoln, Nebr.) using the 380-900 nm wavelength range at an incidence angle of 70°. The results were fitted to a Cauchy module.
Non-Specific Protein Adsorption, Antibody Modification, and Antigen Detection.
The non-specific adsorption, antibody immobilization, and antigen detection was monitored using a four-channel SPR sensor with the Kretschmann configuration and wavelength modulation as described in H. Vaisocherova, W. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Q. Cao, G. Cheng, M. Piliarik, J. Homola, S. Y. Jiang, Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 7894-7901. SPR chips were made of a glass slide coated with titanium (2 nm) followed by gold (48 nm) using an electron beam evaporator. A 1 nm SPR wavelength shift corresponded to a change in the protein surface coverage of 17 ng cm−2, which was corrected to account for loss of sensitivity due to the polymer films using previously described methods (W. Yang, H. Xue, W. Li, J. L. Zhang, S. Y. Jiang, Langmuir 2009, 25, 11911-11916; J. Homola, Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2006). For fouling experiments, undiluted human serum or plasma were injected (10 min, 40 μL min-1) and the wavelength shift between PBS baselines was converted to a surface coverage. Anti-TSH was immobilized by first injecting 10 mM sodium acetate (SA, pH 5) followed by EDC/NHS (0.2 M/0.05 M in water) for 7 min at 30 μL min-1. Anti-TSH (50 μg mL-1 in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5) was injected (20 min, 20 μL min-1) followed by deactivating with 10 mM sodium carbonate containing 300 mM sodium chloride (pH 10) for 10 min and the SA both at 30 μL min-1. Immobilization was calculated as the difference between SA baselines before IgG injection and after deactivation. TSH was antigen binding was then monitored by first injecting PBS and then antigen (1 μg mL−1 in PBS at 40 μL min−1) following by PBS.
The Preparation, Characterization, and Properties of Representative Polymer Films: Polycarboxybetaine Films by SI-PIMP
In this example, the preparation, characterization, and properties of representative polymer films of the invention, polycarboxybetaine (pCB) films prepared by SI-PIMP, are described.
Materials.
Solvents including acetone, methanol (MeOH) and tetrahydrofuran (THF) at the highest available purity were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, Wis.). CB monomer and photoiniferter (N,N-(diethylamino)-dithiocarbamoylbenzyl(trimethyoxy)thiol (DTCA)) were synthesized by literature methods. Fibrinogen, lysozyme, tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TED), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Human thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) antibody and antigen were from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, Mass.). Deionized water with minimum resistivity of 18.0 MΩ cm used in the experiment was from a Millipore water purification system (Billerica, Mass.). The buffers including 150 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4, 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (SA) at pH 5.0, 10 mM sodium carbonate buffer (SC) with 300 mM NaCl at pH 10 and 10 mM HEPES at pH 7.5 were prepared for biomolecular conjugation and bioassay. The pH values were adjusted with HCl or NaOH. The buffers were degassed prior to use. Human plasma used for challenging the surface coatings were purchased from BioChemed Services (Winchester, Va.).
Preparation of Polymer Brushes Via Photoiniferter-Mediated Polymerization (PIMP).
The UV-ozone cleaned SPR chip was immersed in THF containing 2 mM DTCA at room temperature for 24 h in order to form a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of photoiniferter, followed by intensive rinsing with THF and drying with a stream of filtered air. The photoiniferter modified chip was transferred to a quartz reaction tube containing 170 mg of CB monomers and TED molecules with different concentrations for growth of the first pCB layer. The reaction tube was placed under nitrogen protection, sealed with a rubber septum and wrapped with parafilm. The solvents used were deoxygenated with a continuous stream of dry nitrogen for more than 30 min, and then 5 mL of MeOH was transferred to the reaction tube using a syringe under nitrogen protection. The photo-polymerization was conducted by means of a UV lamp emitting light at 302 nm coupled with 280 nm cutoff filter in order to avoid the deterioration of thiol-gold bonds. 31 After the 30 min UV exposure, the chips were removed and rinsed with water and PBS to remove loosely bound polymers. For the re-growth of pCB for the second layer, the preparation method was the same as that for the first layer, but the TED was not needed and the water content in the solvents was adjusted to optimize the thickness of the films.
Ellipsometry.
The dry thicknesses (d) of pCB was determined using an ellipsometer (model alpha-SE, J. A. Woollam, Lincoln, Nebr.) with a light source with wavelengths ranging from 380 to 900 nm at a fixed incident angle of 70°. The thickness measurements were taken on six spots on each sample. The results were analyzed using a Cauchy model. The refractive index of polymer films was around 1.5.
SPR Measurements.
A four-channel SPR sensor was used (H. Vaisocherová, W. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Cao, G. Cheng, M. Piliarik, J. Homola, S. Jiang, Analytical Chem., 80, 7894 (2008)). Briefly, the SPR sensor, based on the Kretschman configuration, detects the changes of the refractive index arising from the molecular adsorption at the sensor chip surface. The sensor chip was washed with PBS and water and dried with a stream of air. On the glass side of the chip a drop of the refractive index matching liquid (Cargille, Cedar Grove, N.J.) was placed and then attached onto the base of the prism. The flow cell was mounted on the chip and filled with the buffer by a peristaltic pump (Ismatec, Vernon Hills, Ill.). A baseline signal was established by flowing PBS at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1 over the chip surface for 20 min. For the fouling test, undiluted blood serum and plasma were flowed over the chip at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1 for 10 min, followed by PBS washing. For quantitative estimation of surface mass coverage with the SPR sensor operating at a resonant wavelength of around 750 nm, a 1 nm SPR wavelength shift represents a change in the protein surface coverage of 17 ng cm−2. The signal calibration and the estimation for surface mass coverage (Γ) are described in Yang, W.; Xue, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, J. L.; Jiang, S. Y. Langmuir 2009, 25, 11911; and Vaisocherova, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, W.; Cao, Z. Q.; Cheng, G.; Taylor, A. D.; Piliarik, M.; Homola, J.; Jiang, S. Y. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 1924.
Protein Modification and Bioassay for TSH Hormone.
The functionalization of pCB layers with TSH antibodies through EDC/NHS coupling chemistry was in situ monitored by means of the SPR sensor. SA buffer was flowed over the surface to swell the polymer and to establish the baseline for 20 min. The activation reagent, EDC/NHS mixture in water with a molar ratio of 0.2 M/0.05 M, was introduced at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1 for 7 min, followed by 5 min flushing of SA buffer to flow away unreacted EDC/NHS chemicals. HEPES buffer spiked with TSH antibodies at a concentration of 50 μg mL−1 was flowed through the channel at a flow rate of 20 μL min−1 for 20 min. Afterwards, the unreactive groups were hydrolyzed to recover to carboxyl acid groups by washing with basic SC buffer at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1 for 10 min, followed by SA buffer. The binding capacity was estimated as the surface mass changes before the IgG injection and after hydrolysis in SA buffer.
The detections for TSH antigens spiked in PBS at a concentration of 1 μg mL−1 were performed after TSH IgG functionalization on pCB layers. Prior to and after the assay, PBS buffer was flowed over the polymer surfaces for 20 min. Samples containing TSH antigens were introduced into the channels of the flow cell at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1 and flowed until the binding curve reached a plateau.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Imaging.
The pCB films with and without IgG functionalization on SPR chips were dried with a stream of filter air and attached onto the AFM sample holder. The AFM secondographic images were taken in a taping mode using a Dimension 3100 AFM (Digital Instruments/Veeco, Woodbury, N.Y.). Noncontact silicon cantilevers with a resonant frequency of 315 kHz and a force constant of 48 N m−1 (MikroMasch, Tallinn, Estonia) were used.
The Preparation, Characterization, and Properties of Representative Polymer Films: Polycarboxybetaine Films by SI-ATRP
In this example, the preparation, characterization, and properties of representative polymer films of the invention, polycarboxybetaine (pCB) films prepared by SI-ATRP, are described.
Materials.
Copper (I) bromide (99.999%), 2,2′-bipyridine (BPY, 99%), tetrahydrofuran (THF), methanol, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.01 M phosphate, 0.138 M sodium chloride, 0.0027 M potassium chloride, pH 7.4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Ethanol (200 Proof) was purchased from Decon Laboratories (King of Prussia, Pa.). Sodium carbonate anhydrous and sodium azide were purchased from EMD Chemicals (Darmstadt, Germany). Sodium chloride (NaCl) and ether were purchased from J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, N.J.). Sodium acetate anhydrous was purchased from Fluka (subsidiary of Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.). 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Pooled human serum was purchased from Biochemed Services (Winchester, Va.). Antibody to thyroid stimulating hormone (anti-TSH) and the TSH antigen were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, Mass.). Water used in the experiments was purified using a Millipore water purification system with a minimum resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm.
Synthesis of Carboxybetaine Acrylamide (CBAA) Monomer.
(3-Acryloylamino-propyl)-(2-carboxy-ethyl)-dimethyl-ammonium (CBAA) was synthesized by reacting 48 mL of DMAPA with 25 g of β-propiolactone in 400 mL of anhydrous acetone at 0° C. under nitrogen protection. After removing the ice bath at 20 minutes, the solution was allowed to warm up to room temperature. After 6 hours, the product was filtered, washed with ether, and allowed to dry under vacuum. The rough product, a white precipitate, was re-dissolved in a 30% (v/v) triethylamine in methanol solution and stirred overnight. After concentrating the solution, the CBAA was precipitated with acetone and then filtered. The solids were suspended in acetone and ether, for 1 hour each, dried under vacuum, and then stored at 4° C. Yield: 61%. 1H NMR (Bruker 500 MHz, DMSO-d6): 8.61 (t, 1H, N—H), 6.28 (t, 1H, CHH═CH), 6.13 (t, 1H, CHH═CH), 5.61 (t, 1H, CHH═CH), 3.44 (t, 2H, N—CH2-CH2-COO), 3.21 (m, 4H, NH—CH2-CH2-CH2), 2.97 (s, 6H, N—(CH3)2), 2.25 (t, 2H, CH2-COO), 1.87 (t, 2H, NH—CH2-CH2-CH2).
Preparation of Two-Layer PolyCBAA Films.
SPR sensor chips coated with ATRP initiator self-assembled monolayers were prepared by soaking the gold-coated substrates into 1 mM mercaptoundecyl bromoisobutyrate in pure ethanol for 24 hours. The chips were then removed, rinsed with ethanol, THF, and ethanol, and the blown dry using filtered compressed air and placed into a custom glass tube reactor for ATRP. In a separate glass tube, 8.86 mg CuBr, 57.85 mg 2,2′-bipyridine (BPY), and 600 mg of CBAA were added. Both tubes were then placed under nitrogen protection. Nitrogen purged methanol (4 mL) was then added to the solids. Once completely dissolved (about 15 min), the mixture was then transferred to the reactor tube under nitrogen protection and allowed to react for 24 hours at 25° C. in a shaker set to 120 rpm. The reaction was removed and quenched with a solution containing methanol (4 mL) and CuBr2 (275.87) in order to maintain the maximum number of surface terminal bromine grown polymer chains. After mixing for two minutes, the chips were rinsed with methanol, water, and then submerged in PBS.
The second polymer block was then grown by repeating the above ATRP procedure and adjusting only the solvent ratio between nitrogen purged methanol and water in the final reaction mixture. For the re-initiated polymerization was allowed to react for 3 hours at 25° C. in a shaker set to 120 rpm. Following the reaction the chips were rinsed with copious amounts of water and then submerged overnight in PBS. In order to terminate bromine groups on the surface and replace them with non-reactive azide moieties to further reduce the polymer density of the second block, the chips were submerged in an aqueous solution of sodium azide (6.5 mg/mL) and mixed at room temperature. After a specific time, the chips were removed, dipped in PBS, rinsed with water, dried, and the placed into the custom tube reactor for re-initiating ATRP.
SPR Sensor, Chips, and Calibration of the Surface Sensitivity.
A laboratory SPR sensor developed at the Institute of Photonics and Electronics, Prague, Czech Republic was used as described in H. Vaisocherová, W. Yang, Z. Zhang, Z. Cao, G. Cheng, M. Piliarik, J. Homola, S. Jiang, Analytical Chem., 80, 7894 (2008). The SPR is based on the attenuated total reflection method and wavelength modulation. It is equipped with a four-channel flow-cell, temperature control, and uses a peristaltic pump for delivering samples. SPR sensor chips were made of a glass slide coated with an adhesion-promoting titanium film (about 2 mm) followed by a gold film (about 48 nm) using an electron beam evaporator. Because the SPR sensitivity depends on the distance of the binding event from the SPR active surface, the sensor response due to the polymer films was calibrated as described in H. Vaisocherova et al., 2008 (above).
Determination of Polymer Film Thickness, Refractive Index, and Polymer Density.
Dry and wet film thickness and refractive index (RI) measurements were determined using a multi-wavelength ellipsometer (J. A. Woollam Co., Inc., Model alpha-SE). A liquid cell with a volume of 0.5 mL supplied by the manufacturer was used for obtaining the wet measurements. The data was analyzed via fitting a Cauchy model for a bare SPR substrate which enables the film thickness and refractive index to be simultaneously determined without using predetermined or assumed Cauchy coefficients. The wet and dry refractive index measurements were then used with the effective medium approximation for calculating the film polymer volume fraction, PVF, (i.e., the wet polymer density)
Measurements of Non-Specific Protein Adsorption by SPR.
The non-specific protein adsorption of the pCBAA polymer films formed via SI-ATRP was determined with a SPR biosensor using a flow rate of 50 μL/min at 25° C. After first establishing a baseline using PBS, undiluted human serum was flowed for 10 minutes, followed by buffer to reestablish the baseline. Protein adsorption was quantified as the difference between buffer baselines and converted to a surface coverage using the appropriate sensitivity factor.
In Situ Functionalization of pCB Polymer Surfaces.
The functionalization procedure was monitored step-by-step in real time using an SPR sensor at 25° C. Sodium acetate buffer (10 mM) at pH 5.0 (SA) was first injected at 30 μL/min to obtain a stable baseline. The carboxylate groups of the polymer surface were then activated by flowing a freshly prepared solution of 0.05 M NHS and 0.2 M EDC in water for 7 minutes. Followed by a brief injection of SA buffer, a solution of anti-TSH (50 μg/mL) in HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) was flowed over the activated surface for 20 minutes at 20 μL/min. Subsequent washing of the functionalized surface for 10 minutes with 10 mM sodium carbonate (pH 10) containing 0.3 M NaCl (SC) at 30 μL/min removed non-covalently bound ligands and deactivated residual NHS-esters. SA buffer was then used to reestablish a stable baseline. The amount of immobilized antibodies was determined as the different between the SA injection following EDC/NHS activation and the final baseline.
Measurements of Post-Functionalized Non-Fouling and Specific Protein Activity.
Following antibody immobilization, the pCBAA surface was washed with PBS buffer until a steady baseline was established at 50 μL/min and 25° C. For post-functionalized non-fouling, undiluted human blood serum was then injected for 10 minutes followed by PBS for an additional 15 minutes. The net adsorption was calculated as the difference between buffer baselines and converted to a surface coverage. Specific antigen detection was compared by measuring the response at saturation for each polymer film. After establishing an initial buffer baseline, PBS spiked with TSH at 1000 ng/mL was flowed through sensor for 10 minutes followed by buffer. The saturated antigen binding was calculated as the difference between the original buffer baseline and the maximum response which was then converted to a surface coverage.
Packing Density of Representative Zwitterionic Polymer Brushes: Refractive Index
In this example, the effects of chain packing density on protein resistance properties of surface-initiated polymer brushes as measured by refractive index are described.
Polymer brushes can theoretically be described via chain lengths and chain-to-chain distances. Practically, ellipsometry is often used to measure the film thickness, which has been correlated to ultra low fouling properties of polymer brushes to undiluted human blood plasma and serum. However, ellipsometry also calculates an additional parameter, the film refractive index (RI). This film RI can be used to characterize the polymer density, but is often overlooked in practice. The film RI may be an even more important parameter for identifying nonfouling polymer films. By varying the water content in the surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) of zwitterionic carboxybetaine, protein resistance to undiluted human serum was determined to be strongly dependent on the film RI. A minimum value of about 1.5 RI units was necessary to achieve <5 ng/cm2 of protein adsorption, measured using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor.
The swelling behavior of a film, determined as the ratio of wet and dry thicknesses, is one approach to study polymer density. Tightly packed polymer brushes in a good solvent will swell less than lower density brushes. These tightly packed films have high extension in the dry state and significant further extension is limited upon swelling. Ellipsometry also calculates an additional parameter, the film refractive index (RI). This film RI can be used to characterize the polymer density, but is often overlooked in practice. Because the RI measurements of films account for two factors, the medium (e.g., air, RI of about 1.0) as well as the material itself (e.g., proteins, RI of about 1.53), the RI of a polymer film will increase with density. Importantly, the RI can be measured in the dry state, thus offering a convenient and simple approach for film characterization.
SI-ATRP was used to investigate a parameter capable of characterizing and predicting ultra low fouling properties of pCBAA films. SI-ATRP is a controlled radical polymerization that enables the formation of polymer brushes with low polydispersity, high density, and a desired thickness. It is based on the equilibrium reaction between activated propagating chains and those that have been capped by a deactivating complex. The highly localized and low concentration of immobilized initiators in SI-ATRP (relative to solution ATRP) is a major challenge for achieving control due to the low concentration of persistent deactivator which can trap the propagating radical. The rate of polymerization is highly dependent upon the ratio of activator to deactivator; reduction in the latter leads to fast and uncontrolled growth. This increases the film polydispersity as well as the probability of irreversible chain-chain termination events thereby affecting the polymer density. For aqueous ATRP, the water content has been shown to sharply affect the rate of reaction due to a significant loss of deactivator, among other side reactions. This has previously enabled the use of SI-ATRP with 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) to obtain a peak film thickness at some medium water concentration. Because the polydispersity of a film is related to its polymer density, varying the content of water during SI-ATRP enables a convenient approach for studying the effect of film thickness and polymer density on the nonfouling properties of pCBAA brushes.
Ultra low fouling properties of pCBAA films formed via SI-ATRP was investigated using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors. Protein resistance to undiluted human serum was studied as a function of the polymer thickness and dry refractive index, the latter representing the polymer density. The results indicated that the nonfouling properties of pCBAA films were not affected much by the polymer thickness, but instead were strongly dependent on the RI.
Materials.
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.) and Decon Laboratories (King of Prussia, Pa.). Pooled human serum was purchased from Biochemed Services (Winchester, Va.).
Preparation of pCBAA Films.
UV cleaned SPR sensor chips coated with ATRP initiator self-assembled monolayers were prepared by soaking in 0.1 mM mercaptoundecyl bromoisobutyrate in pure ethanol for 24 hours. The chips were then removed, rinsed with ethanol, THF, and ethanol, and the blown dry using filtered air and placed into a custom glass tube reactor. In a separate glass tube, 8.86 mg CuBr, 57.85 mg 2,2′-bipyridine, and 600 mg of CBAA were added. Both tubes were then placed under nitrogen protection. Appropriate volumes of nitrogen purged methanol and water were then added (total volume was 4 mL) to the solids according to the necessary solvent ratio. After dissolving the solids (about 15 min), the mixture was then transferred to the reactor tube under nitrogen protection and allowed to react for 3 hours at 25° C. in a shaker set to 120 rpm. Following the reaction the chips were rinsed with water and then submerged overnight in PBS.
SPR Sensor, Chips, and Calibration of the Surface Sensitivity.
A laboratory SPR sensor developed at the Institute of Photonics and Electronics, Prague, Czech Republic was used as described above. This custom built SPR is based on the Kretschmann geometry of the attenuated total reflection method with wavelength modulation and is equipped with a four-channel flow-cell, temperature control, and uses a peristaltic pump for delivering samples. SPR sensor chips were made of a glass slide coated with an adhesion-promoting titanium film (about 2 nm) followed by a gold film (about 48 nm) using an electron beam evaporator. Because SPR sensitivity depends on the distance of the binding event from the SPR active surface, the sensor response due to the polymer films was calibrated using methods described above.
Determination of Polymer Film Thickness, Refractive Index, and Polymer Density.
Dry and wet film thickness and refractive index (RI) measurements were determined using a multi-wavelength ellipsometer (J. A. Woollam Co., Inc., Model alpha-SE). A liquid cell with a volume of 0.5 mL supplied by the manufacturer was used for obtaining the wet measurements. The data was analyzed via fitting a Cauchy model for a bare SPR substrate which enables the film thickness and refractive index to be simultaneously determined without using predetermined or assumed Cauchy coefficients. The wet and dry refractive index measurements were then used with the effective medium approximation for calculating the wet polymer density (i.e., film polymer volume fraction (PVF). See Equation 1.
The wet polymer density (PVF) in PBS of pCBAA films made via SI-ATRP using 0%, 10%, 50% and 90% water (v/v) was calculated using Equation 1 as described above.
Measurements of Nonspecific Protein Adsorption by SPR.
Nonspecific protein adsorption of the pCBAA polymer films was determined with a SPR biosensor using a flow rate of 50 μL/min at 25° C. After first establishing a baseline using PBS, undiluted human serum was flowed for 10 minutes, followed by buffer. Protein adsorption was quantified as the difference between buffer baselines and converted to a surface coverage using the appropriate sensitivity factor.
Results.
The pCBAA films were achieved by varying the SI-ATRP water content from 0-90% (v/v) using a fixed reaction time. The corresponding dry film thicknesses (8-40 nm), dry RI values (1.48-1.56 RI units (RIU)), and protein adsorption to undiluted human serum indicated a maximum value for both the thickness and RI as the polymerization rate was varied. All films except for those made using 90% water (v/v) enabled ultra low fouling properties. Thus it appears that thickness does not play a significant role in protein resistance. Because the dry film RI is proportional to the polymer density, the relatively high fouling for the films made from 90% water is likely due to its lower polymer density with a correspondingly reduced hydration, the primary mechanism of protein resistance. In the initial stages of polymerization for a given reaction, the thickness as well as the polymer density are simultaneously changing. Thus, the thickness can still serve as an indirect measure for achieving nonfouling surfaces. However, the results here illustrate that the polymer density may be the direct and more important parameter for reflecting protein resistance. This enables one to achieve ultra low fouling with a densely packed thin film.
A minimum RI value (about 1.5) was observed, representing a minimum polymer density for achieving ultra low fouling properties with pCBAA films. The pCBAA film had a peak thickness at about 40 nm using 20% water (v/v). The ATRP reaction rate has been shown to be significantly affected by the concentration of water. As the water content increases, the rate of polymerization increases primarily due to loss of deactivator. For example, polymer films grown using 0% water enable a relatively slow reaction with low polydispersity. Under this condition, the final thickness is likely limited by the maximum solubility of the dense brushes in methanol. Here, the solvation ability of methanol gradually changes from good to bad as the chain length increases and the solubility approaches saturation. This leads to confinement of the growing chain end, limiting the access of free monomer as well as the catalyst complex thus preventing further propagation. Increasing the amount of water leads to both an increase in the accessibility of the chain end due to the super-hydrophilicity of zwitterionic carboxybetaine materials and an increase in the polymerization rate, resulting in larger film thicknesses. However, this comes at the expense of more polydispersity (i.e., loss of control) and more frequent irreversible chain-chain radical termination events. If such recombination events occur too often, as in the case of very high water concentrations, the film thickness can decrease. Therefore, increasing the water content should initially lead to larger film thicknesses until sufficient recombination occurs.
The RI measurements have a similar trend to the film thicknesses. Because the dry film RI is proportional to polymer density, these results indicate that the density initially increases and then rapidly decreases with the rate of the ATRP reaction. The films made from 0% and 90% water had the lowest densities in air, despite the former being made under the most controlled conditions (i.e., water-free) which would be expected to yield a very high density polymer brush. The films made using 10%-60% water had the highest polymer densities. These are attributed to changes in surface morphology and packing structure of the film due to the increased polydispersity allowing for ion-pair interactions of the loose chains, which collapse onto the surface in the presence of air, similar to a multilayer polyelectrolyte film. The low value achieved for the film made from 0% water is due to the highly uniform and monodisperse brush containing few collapsed chains. The result for the film made with 90% water (v/v) was likely caused by excessive radical termination reactions which occur under this condition, thus creating little pockets for air thereby reducing the density. This is supported by the rapid decrease in thickness for films made from high water concentrations.
The wet polymer density (polymer volume fraction (PVF)) in PBS of several films was also studied. A low wet density will have a large amount of solvent relative to polymer material thus enabling a large degree of swelling, corresponding to a “loose” polymer structure. The films made using 0%, 10%, 50%, and 90% water had wet densities of 62%, 48%, 35%, and 73%, respectively. The initial decrease follows the expected increase in polydispersity for the faster polymerizations, such as with high water concentrations. Therefore, because the films made using 90% water elicit widespread termination events, as indicated by the rapid decrease in thickness, it is believed that such significant chain-end recombination restricted the polymer from swelling yielding a high wet density.
In summary, the data revealed a RI range of 1.50-1.56 RIU with wet polymer densities from 62-35% PVF that allowed zwitterionic pCBAA films to achieve <5 ng/cm2 of nonspecific protein adsorption from undiluted human serum.
The results enable a model of the polymer structure as a function of water content (polymerization rate) and protein resistance to be developed. The water free scenario results in thin but uniform and dense polymer brushes with low polydispersity and ultra low fouling properties. As the water concentration increases, the polydispersity increases but the amount of termination is not excessive enough to significantly suppress film growth. The continued propagation enabled by the lack of recombination provides for a similarly dense base-layer to form and thus ultra low fouling properties can be achieved. The scenario for high water content occurs with very fast and uncontrolled reactions in which radical recombination frequently occurs. This restricts polymer growth and reduces the polymer density thereby affecting the film hydration and subsequent protein resistance.
Packing Density of Representative Zwitterionic Polymer Brushes: Swell Ratio
In this example, the effects of chain packing density on protein resistance properties of surface-initiated polymer brushes as measured by swelling ratio are described.
Polymer brushes based on dual-function poly(carboxybetaine acrylamide) (pCB) were prepared via surface-initiated photoiniferter-mediated polymerization to determine the effects of the chain packing density on the protein resistant properties of surface-initiated polymer brushes. By adjusting the UV radiation time and solvent polarity, films with different thicknesses and packing densities were characterized via ellipsometry under both dry and wet conditions. Non-specific protein adsorption from undiluted human plasma and serum was then measured with a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor. The results indicated that the dry film thickness alone is not a sufficient characterization for evaluating non-fouling properties and the chain packing density must be considered. Based on this study, highly-packed and ultra-thin pCB films were developed and applied to the detection of human thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) in serum by SPR with high sensitivity and specificity.
Previous studies have identified the optimized “dry” thicknesses of pCB brushes for ultra-low fouling properties as being in the range of 20-30 nm. In bio-applications, the films are typically used in an aqueous environment. Hence, the “wet” thickness of the polymer brush films should be taken into account when determining the effects of thickness on non-fouling properties. The ratio of stretched and collapsed polymer film thicknesses was used to determine a swelling ratio as a means to characterize the effects of chain packing density on protein resistance. The packing density and film thickness of tethered pCB brushes prepared via SI photoiniferter-mediated polymerization were varied by adjusting the UV radiation time and solvent polarity. The resulting pCB film thicknesses in air and physiological buffer were measured and correlated with the non-fouling properties to undiluted human serum and plasma. Human thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) detection using SPR integrated with a highly packed and thin pCB film as a binding platform demonstrated remarkable sensitivity and specificity.
Growth and Non-Fouling Properties of pCB Films.
The SI polymerization was carried out in the mixture of ethanol and water with a volume ratio of 75:25 with a monomer concentration of 0.15 M. The thickness (d) and swelling ratio (σ) of prepared pCB films was measured using an ellipsometer and analyzed as a function of the UV radiation time. The thicknesses of pCB films in air and PBS increased with the UV radiation time. After 30 min of UV exposure, the film grew to thicknesses of ddry=22.1±1.1 nm and dwet=62.0±3.1 nm in air and PBS, respectively. However, the swelling ratio showed the opposite trend, declining from 3.6 to 2.8 for the 30 min UV radiation time. For the fouling test with undiluted blood serum and plasma, the fouling level decreased with increasing UV radiation time. As the film grew to ddry=22.1±1.1 nm and σ=2.8, it exhibited ultra-low fouling properties, which is in agreement with those observed on pCB and poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate) previously prepared via SI-ATRP.
A steep increase in thickness was observed at the beginning of polymerization, which was more pronounced for the “wet” thickness. The non-linear growth rate of pCB provides evidence that surface-tethered free radicals are lost during the course of polymerization. This observation confirms the feature of the initial rapid growth in photoiniferter-mediated photo-polymerization. The stretching of polymers decreased with UV radiation time. The rapid growth and termination of tethered polymers rendered the film sparse and the polymer chains coiled, giving rise to a “mushroom” conformation, manifested in the high swelling ratio. As the “living” polymer chains continue to grow, the chains interact with each other and, hence, stretch to become a “brush” conformation. The film thickness and chain packing density synergistically affect the non-fouling properties.
Solvent Effects on Brush Packing Density and Non-Fouling Properties.
In order to solidify the correlation between chain packing density and non-fouling properties, a pCB film with a thin thickness and high packing density was prepared through changing the solvent content in the polymerization. The UV radiation time and monomer concentration remained constant at 30 min and 0.15 M, respectively, and the volume ratio of methanol to water in solution was changed from 50% to 100%. Film thicknesses in air and in PBS decreased with the ratio of methanol, as well as their swelling ratio, which dropped from 3.7 to 2.5. The surface resistance to fouling from serum and plasma on pCB samples indicates that with increasing methanol content during photo-polymerization, non-specific adsorption on surfaces tends to decrease, reaching the ultra low fouling level. Furthermore, two samples were prepared from MeOH:H2O ratios of 50:50 and 70:30 for shorter radiation time, which exhibited similar dry film thicknesses but swelling ratios distinct from those prepared by the 100% methanol condition (
The solvent effect was taken into consideration for investigating chain packing density and subsequent resistance to protein adsorption. Water and methanol were chosen as solvents for the super hydrophilic CB monomer due to their high polarity indices, which are 9.0 and 5.1, respectively. Higher methanol content leads to more controllable polymerization. These results for the first time reveal the correlation among non-fouling properties, growth rate and packing density of polymer films prepared via SI photo-polymerization approach, and point out the importance of the internal architecture of polymer brush for delicate design of desirable surface properties.
SPR Detection for TSH Hormone Antigen.
Functionalizable pCB was applied to a binding platform in SPR for in situ detection of TSH antigens in undiluted serum. Experiments were performed on pCB films fabricated from the solvents with MeOH:H2O ratios of 50:50, 70:30 and 100:0 under 30 min UV radiation, and the wet thicknesses of resulting films were 93.7±1.5 nm, 67.8±1.2 nm, and 22.8±2.3 nm, respectively. For convenience, those samples were denoted pCB-94, pCB-68, and pCB-23, respectively, according to their wet thicknesses. The surfaces were functionalized with anti-TSH antibodies through EDC/NHS coupling chemistry and the resulting binding capacities were 422.7±8.2 ng cm−2, 396.2±13.6 ng cm−2, and 262.5±0.8 ng cm−2 on pCB-94, pCB-68 and pCB-23, respectively. After the establishment of baseline, undiluted blood serum containing 1 μg mL-1 TSH antigens was flowed over the surfaces in contact with conjugated IgG molecules and, additionally, in the other channel the serum without antigen was parallel tested as a control experiment. In order to compare the net responses upon antigen binding on three surfaces, the signals obtained from TSH-containing channels were subtracted from the signals of control channels. The net sensor responses to TSH binding on pCB films indicated that the strengths of responses increased with decrease in film thicknesses.
The evanescent wave-based biosensor, such as SPR, exhibits a strength profile of a probing field exponentially decaying from the interface. For the regular SPR, the penetration depth of the probing field is typically around 200 nm, beyond which the binding event cannot be detected. pCB-23 with high chain packing density was prepared under a water-free condition. Compared to the films prepared from water-rich solutions, the pCB-23 represents very high sensor responses to TSH binding in complex media due to its ultra-low fouling properties and thin thickness although its antibody loading was the lowest. Therefore, the high resistance to non-specific adsorption and the effective use of probing field allow enhancing dramatically the specificity and sensitivity of biosensors.
While illustrative embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/588,785, filed Jan. 20, 2012, expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under HDTRA1-10-1-0074 awarded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and under N000140910137 awarded by the Office of Naval Research. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3671502 | Samour | Jun 1972 | A |
| 4075183 | Kawakami | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4138446 | Kawakami | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4415388 | Korpman | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4493926 | Williams, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4921915 | Dengler | May 1990 | A |
| 4985023 | Blank | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5204060 | Allenmark | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5233453 | Sivarajan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5633724 | King et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5638396 | Klimek | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5714360 | Swan | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5776711 | Vyas et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781284 | Infante | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5804453 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5838870 | Soref | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5919523 | Sundberg | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5952035 | Erb et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5986042 | Irizato | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6330388 | Bendett et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6361768 | Galleguillos | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370406 | Wach et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6486333 | Murayama | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488896 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6558626 | Aker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570893 | Libatique et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6661950 | Strecker | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6781696 | Rosenberger et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782205 | Trisnadi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6831938 | Gunn, III | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6834152 | Gunn, III et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6839488 | Gunn, III | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6853756 | Gerlach et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6888973 | Kolodziejski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6897263 | Hell | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6917727 | Gunn, III et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920272 | Wang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 7008559 | Chen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027476 | Taghavi-Larigani et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7056532 | Kabanov | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7067072 | Chen | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7067342 | Zia et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7075954 | Ledentsov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082235 | Gunn, III | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7095010 | Scherer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7120338 | Gunn, III | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126136 | Chen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7127147 | Gunn, III et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7139459 | Kochergin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7145165 | Cox et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7164821 | Gunn, III | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7167606 | Gunn, III et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7167615 | Wawro et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7177492 | Strecker | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7212701 | Strecker | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228016 | Beausoleil | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7244926 | Ja et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7266271 | Strecker et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7291427 | Kawamura | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7306625 | Stratford | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7307719 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7309628 | Zia et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315679 | Hochberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7324199 | Ja et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7335248 | Abou-Nemeh | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7336859 | Sanders | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7361501 | Koo et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368281 | Mozdy et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7397043 | Ja | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7400399 | Wawro et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7419636 | Aker et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7419638 | Saltsman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7435944 | Ja et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7462325 | Hancock et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7488930 | Ajgaonkar et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7497992 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7501092 | Chen | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7508849 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519257 | Lipson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528403 | Borselli et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7538329 | Chen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7539369 | Yamazaki | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7616850 | Watts et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7634165 | Wang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7639723 | Yamazaki | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7643710 | Liu | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7648835 | Breidford et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7664157 | Yamazaki | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7693369 | Fan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7713689 | Chilkoti | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7737224 | Willis | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7738527 | He | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7763453 | Clemmens et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7773642 | Yamazaki | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7778499 | Janz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7783144 | Chigrinov et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| RE41643 | Boutos | Sep 2010 | E |
| 7796262 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7799573 | Deans et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7815922 | Chaney | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7825380 | Puscasu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7826688 | Sadagopan et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7831123 | Sparacin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831298 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7835006 | Ja | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7853108 | Popovic et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7879444 | Jiang | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7903909 | Popovic | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7936463 | Kiesel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7955836 | Clemmens et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7961988 | Krug et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7968848 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970244 | Krug et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7973696 | Puscasu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7982878 | Ja | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7983517 | Watts et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7999938 | Wang | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8000565 | Liu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8019185 | Yap | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8045834 | Painter et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8064490 | Okayama | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8068706 | Popovic et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8076090 | Fang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8094987 | Martin Armani | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8111401 | Magnusson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8111402 | Le et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8116603 | Popovic | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8120782 | Kiesel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8139904 | Green et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8195011 | Goldring et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8195014 | Heideman et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8213751 | Ho et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8244077 | Yap | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8263986 | Hajj-Hassan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8270789 | Ogawa et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8270790 | Ogawa et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8288157 | Duer | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8295315 | Ward et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8307724 | Wichert et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8447145 | Goldring et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8467858 | Vertikov et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8493560 | Shopova et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8544506 | Auriol | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8617592 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8835144 | Jiang | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 20020127236 | Rodkey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128234 | Hubbell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030059853 | Lockhart | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143580 | Straus | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040063587 | Horton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063881 | Lewis | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040067503 | Tan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086543 | Keogh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121337 | Deans et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050054908 | Blank et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050058689 | McDaniel | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208428 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220880 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060116562 | Acosta et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060140240 | Chen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183863 | Huang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193550 | Wawro et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194008 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060196253 | Crawley et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240072 | Chudzik | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060255292 | Ja | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060270064 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070036479 | Beausoleil | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070042198 | Schonemyr | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070104654 | Hsieh | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070111321 | Deans et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133001 | Cox et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070224652 | Holgersson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080130393 | Yeung | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080131939 | Roper | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160600 | Zuccato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181861 | Jiang | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080193076 | Witzens et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080248578 | Deans et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080299177 | Hardy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316485 | Wawro et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090017455 | Kwong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068668 | Duer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068726 | Magnin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090156460 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197791 | Balastre | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259015 | Jiang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325211 | Fang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100099160 | Jiang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247614 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100248391 | Garcia Tello | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249267 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110039717 | Kwong et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039730 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110045472 | Gunn, III | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110097277 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105712 | Jiang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110116093 | Liu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110129846 | Huh et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110133063 | Ji et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142396 | Okamoto | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158582 | Su et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195104 | Jiang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282005 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120069331 | Shopova et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120092650 | Gunn, III et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120107946 | Deans et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120195332 | Yoffe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120225474 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120225475 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258549 | Lu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120276549 | Cunningham et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130071061 | Tu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130083815 | Fang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130109941 | Li et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144148 | Li et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244249 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130288387 | Blancher et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140135760 | Cadouri et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140221577 | Jiang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140315760 | Ratner et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140370567 | Jiang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10 2006 004 111 | Aug 2007 | DE |
| 0 354 984 | Feb 1990 | EP |
| 0 419 654 | Apr 1991 | EP |
| 0 479 245 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 1263533 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 1773481 | Aug 2010 | EP |
| 2229583 | Sep 2010 | EP |
| 2347247 | Jul 2011 | EP |
| 2 496 614 | Sep 2012 | EP |
| 63-39909 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 63-234007 | Sep 1988 | JP |
| 3-110473 | May 1991 | JP |
| 10-132732 | May 1998 | JP |
| 2004-510851 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2005-521052 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2007-130194 | May 2007 | JP |
| 2010-530955 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| 4733331 | Jul 2011 | JP |
| 4758891 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 4885852 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2013-510229 | Mar 2013 | JP |
| 1780673 | Dec 1992 | SU |
| 9816831 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| 0039176 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 0228929 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 2003023474 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| 2003023824 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| 03036290 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2003081230 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2004058837 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2004100666 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2007024393 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007024933 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007068744 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| 2007099239 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2007127512 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2008019381 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008061223 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008083390 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008122793 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2009014553 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009025680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009067562 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009067565 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009067566 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009076323 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009099126 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2009136869 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2010030251 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010033435 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010062627 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| 2010120293 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2011057219 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011057224 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011057225 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011088247 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| 2011133670 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2011152747 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2012061778 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012149497 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Kastantin et al., “Helix Formation in the Polymer Brush,” Macromolecules, 2011, vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 4977-4987; Publication Date (Web): Jun. 2, 2011. |
| Tao Wu, “Formation and properties of surface-anchored polymer assemblies with tunable physico-chemical characteristics,” Dissertation, Raleigh, 2003, published on Internet on Mar. 15, 2003. |
| Zhang et al., “Multilayered Gold-Nanoparticle/Polyimide Composite Thin Film through Layer-by-Layer Assembly,” Langmuir, 2007, vol. 23, No. 20, pp. 10102-10108. |
| Vaisocherovä et al., “Ultralow Fouling and Functionalizable Surface Chemistry Based on a Zwitterionic Polymer Enabling Sensitive and Specific Protein Detection in Undiluted Blood Plasma,” Anal. Chem., 2008, vol. 80, No. 20, pp. 7894-7901; Publication Date (Web): Sep. 23, 2008. |
| Cruse et al., Atlas of Immunology, Third Edition, 2010, p. 835. |
| Kaur et al., “Characterizing monoclonal antibody structure by carboxyl group footprinting,” mABS, 2015, vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 540-552. |
| Brault et al., “Dry Film Refractive Index as an Important Parameter for Ultra-Low Fouling Surface Coatings,” Biomacromolecules, 2012, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 589-593; Publication Date (Web): Feb. 21, 2012. |
| Berge, S.M., et al., “Pharmaceutical Salts,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 66(1):1-19, Jan. 1977. |
| Chang, Y., et al., “Highly Protein-Resistant Coatings From Well-Defined Diblock Copolymers Containing Sulfobetaines,” Langmuir 22(5):2222-2226, Feb. 2006. |
| Chen, S., et al., “Controlling Antibody Orientation on Charged Self-Assembled Monolayers,” Langmuir 19(7):2859-2864, Apr. 2003. |
| Chen, S., et al., “Strong Resistance of Oligo(phosphorylcholine) Self-Assembled Monolayers to Protein Adsorption,” Langmuir 22(6):2418-2421, Mar. 2006. |
| Chen, S., et al., “Strong Resistance of Phosphorylcholine Self-Assembled Monolayers to Protein Adsorption: Insights Into Nonfouling Properties of Zwitterionic Materials,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 127(41):14473-14478, Oct. 2005. |
| Feng, W., et al., “Adsorption of Fibrinogen and Lysozyme on Silicon Grafted With Poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) Via Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization,” Langmuir 21(13):5980-5987, Jun. 2005. |
| Feng, W., et al., “Atom-Transfer Radical Grafting Polymerization of 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl Phosphorylcholine From Silicon Wafer Surfaces,” Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry 42(12):2931-2942, Jun. 2004. |
| Jiang, Y., et al., “Blood Compatibility of Polyurethane Surface Grafted Copolymerization With Sulfobetaine Monomer,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 36(1):27-33, Jul. 2004. |
| Jun, Z., et al., “Surface Modification of Segmented Poly(ether urethane) by Grafting Sulfo Ammonium Zwitterionic Monomer to Improve Hemocompatibilities,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 28(1):1-9, Apr. 2003. |
| Li, L., et al., “Protein Adsorption on Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers: Nanoscale Surface Structural and Chemical Effects,” Langmuir 19(7):2974-2982, Apr. 2003. |
| Li, L., et al., “Protein Adsorption on Oligo(ethylene glycol)-Terminated Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers: The Molecular Basis for Nonfouling Behavior,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109(7):2934-2941, Feb. 2005. |
| Lowe, A.B., et al., “Well-Defined Sulfobetaine-Based Statistical Copolymers as Potential Antibioadherent Coatings,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 52(1):88-94, Jul. 2000. |
| West, S.L., et al., “The Biocompatibility of Crosslinkable Copolymer Coatings Containing Sulfobetaines and Phosphobetaines,” Biomaterials 25:1195-1204, Apr. 2004. |
| Yuan, J., et al., “Chemical Graft Polymerization of Sulfobetaine Monomer on Polyurethane Surface for Reduction in Platelet Adhesion,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 39(1-2):87-94, Nov. 2004. |
| Yuan, J., et al., “Improvement of Blood Compatibility on Cellulose Membrane Surface by Grafting Betaines,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 30(1-2):147-155, Jul. 2003. |
| Yuan, J., “Platelet Adhesion Onto Segmented Polyurethane Surfaces Modified by Carboxybetaine,” Journal of Biomaterial Science, Polymer Edition 14(12):1339-1349, Dec. 2003. |
| Yuan, Y., et al., “Grafting Sulfobetaine Monomer Onto Silicone Surface to Improve Haemocompatability,” Polymer International 53 (1):121-126, Jan. 2004. |
| Yuan, Y., et al. “Grafting Sulfobetaine Monomer Onto the Segmented Poly(ether-urethane) Surface to Improve Hemocompatability,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 13(10):1081-1092, Oct. 2002. |
| Yuan, Y., et al., “Polyurethane Vascular Catheter Surface Grafted With Zwitterionic Sulfobetaine Monomer Activated by Ozone,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 35(1):1-5, May 2004. |
| Yuan, Y., et al., “Surface Modification of SPEU Films by Ozone Induced Graft Copolymerization to Improve Hemocompatibility,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 29(4):247-256, Jun. 2003. |
| Zhang, J., et al., “Chemical Modification of Cellulose Membranes With Sulfo Ammonium Zwitterionic Vinyl Monomer to Improve Hemocompatibility,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 30(3):249-257, Jul. 2003. |
| Zhang, Z., et al., “The Hydrolysis of Cationic Polycarboxybetaine Esters to Zwitterionic Polycarboxybetaines With Controlled Properties,” Biomaterials 29(36):4719-4725, Dec. 2008. |
| Zhang, Z., et al., “Superflow Fouling Sulfobetaine and Carboxybetaine Polymers on Glass Slides,” Langmuir 22(24):10072-10077, Nov. 2006. |
| Zhang, Z., “Surface Grafted Sulfobetaine Polymers Via Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization as Superlow Fouling Coatings,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110(22):10799-10804, Jun. 2006. |
| Zheng, J., “Molecular Simulation Study of Water Interactions With Oligo (Ethylene Glycol)-Terminated Alkanethiol Self-Assembled Monolayers,” Langmuir 20(20):8931-8938, Sep. 2004. |
| Zheng, J., “Strong Repulsive Forces Between Protein and Oligo (Ethylene Glycol) Self-Assembled Monolayers: A Molecular Simulation Study,” Biophysical Journal 89(1):158-166, Jul. 2005. |
| Zhou, J., et al., “Platelet Adhesion and Protein Adsorption on Silicone Rubber Surface by Ozone-Induced Grafted Polymerization With Carboxybetaine Monomer,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 41(1):55-62, Mar. 2005. |
| “Betaine,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betaine> [retrieved Jul. 31, 2011], 1 page. |
| “Bromide,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromide> [retrieved Jul. 27, 2011], 3 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2012, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/055887, filed Nov. 8, 2010, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2011, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/055887, filed Nov. 8, 2010, 12 pages. |
| “Nail Infections,” Health911, <http://www.health911.com/nail-infections> [retrieved Aug. 29, 2011], 3 pages. |
| Anderson, J.M., “Inflammation, Wound Healing, and the Foreign-Body Response,” in B.D. Ratner et al. (eds.), “Biomaterials Science,” 2nd ed., Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, Chap. 4.2, pp. 296-304, 2004. |
| Aspnes, D.E., “Optical Properties of Thin Films,” Thin Solid Films 89(3):249-262, Mar. 1982. |
| Azzaroni, O., et al., “UCST Wetting Transitions of Polyzwitterionic Brushes Driven by Self-Association,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45(11):1770-1774, Mar. 2006. |
| Brault, N.D., et al., “Ultra-Low Fouling and Functionalizable Zwitterionic Coatings Grafted Onto SiO2 via a Biomimetic Adhesive Group for Sensing and Detection in Complex Media,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 25(10):2276-2282, Jun. 2010. |
| Braunecker, W.A., and K. Matyjaszewski, “Controlled/Living Radical Polymerization: Features, Developments, and Perspectives,” Progress in Polymer Science 32(1):93-146, Jan. 2007. |
| Callow, J.A., and M.E. Callow, “Trends in the Development of Environmentally Friendly Fouling-Resistant Marine Coatings,” Nature: Communications 2:244, Mar. 2011, 10 pages. |
| Calvo, K.R., et al., “Clinical Proteomics: From Biomarker Discovery and Cell Signaling Profiles to Individualized Personal Therapy,” Bioscience Reports 25(1-2):107-125, Feb.-Apr. 2005. |
| Cheng, N., et al., “The Effect of [Cu(I)]/[Cu(II)] Ratio on the Kinetics and Conformation of Polyelectrolyte Brushes by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications 27(19):1632-1636, Oct. 2006. |
| De Boer, B., et al., “‘Living’ Free Radical Photopolymerization Initiated From Surface-Grafted Iniferter Monolayers,” Macromolecules 33(2):349-356, Jan. 2000. |
| Deng, J., et al., “Developments and New Applications of UV-Induced Surface Graft Polymerizations,” Progress in Polymer Science 34(2):156-193, Feb. 2009. |
| Dostälek, J., et al., “Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor Based on Integrated Optical Waveguide,” Sensors and Actuators B 76(1-3):8-12, Jun. 2001. |
| Edmondson, S., et al., “Surface Polymerization From Planar Surfaces by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Using Polyelectrolytic Macroinitiators,” Macromolecules 40(15):5271-5278, Jul. 2007. |
| Eisenstein, M., “Protein Arrays: Growing Pains,” Nature 444(7121):959-962, Dec. 2006. |
| Eskin, S.G., et al., “Some Background Concepts,” in B.D. Ratner et al. (eds.), “Biomaterials Science,” 2nd ed., Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004, Chap. 3, pp. 237-246. |
| Farokhzad, O.C., and R. Langer, “Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery,” ACS Nano 3(1):16-20, Jan. 2009. |
| Figeys, D., “Adapting Arrays and Lab-on-a-Chip Technology for Proteomics,” Proteomics 2(4):373-382, Apr. 2002. |
| Goda, T., et al., “Biomimetic Phosphorylcholine Polymer Grafting From Polydimethylsiloxane Surface Using Photo-Induced Polymerization,” Biomaterials 27(30):5151-5160, Oct. 2006. |
| Harder, P., et al., “Molecular Conformation in Oligo(ethylene glycol)-Terminated Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold and Silver Surfaces Determines Their Ability to Resist Protein Adsorption,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 102(2):426-436, Jan. 1998. |
| He, Y., et al., “Molecular Simulation Studies of Protein Interactions With Zwitterionic Phosphorylcholine Self-Assembled Monolayers in the Presence of Water,” Langmuir 24(18):10358-10364, Sep. 2008. |
| Herold, D.A., et al., “Oxidation of Polyethylene Glycols by Alcohol Dehydrogenase,” Biochemical Pharmacology 38(1):73-76, Jan. 1989. |
| Holmlin, R.E, et al., “Zwitterionic SAMs That Resist Nonspecific Adsorption of Protein From Aqueous Buffer,” Langmuir 17(9):2841-2850, May 2001. |
| Homola, J., “Electromagnetic Theory of Surface Plasmons,” in O.S. Wolfbeis (ed.), “Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006, vol. 4, pp. 3-44. |
| Homola, J., “On the Sensitivity of Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors With Spectral Interrogation,” Sensors and Actuators B 41(1-3):207-211, Jun. 1997. |
| Homola, J., and M. Piliarik, “Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Sensors,” in O.S. Wolfbeis (ed.), “Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006, vol. 4, pp. 45-67. |
| Homola, J., et al., “A Novel Multichannel Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor,” Sensors and Actuators B 76(1-3):403-410, Jun. 2001. |
| Homola, J., et al., “Spectral Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor for Detection of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B in Milk,” International Journal of Food Microbiology 75(1-2):61-69, May 2002. |
| Hoyle, C.E., and C.N. Bowman, “Thiol—Ene Click Chemistry,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 49(9):1540-1573, Feb. 2010. |
| Huang, C.-J., et al., “Long-Range Surface Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Spectroscopy Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of E coli 0157:H7,” Analytical Chemistry 83(3):674-677, Feb. 2011. |
| Huang, N.-P., et al., “Poly(L-lysine)-g-poly(ethylene glycol) Layers on Metal Oxide Surfaces: Surface-Analytical Characterization and Resistance to Serum and Fibrinogen Adsorption,” Langmuir 17(2):489-498, Jan. 2001. |
| Huang, R.-P., “Protein Arrays, an Excellent Tool in Biomedical Research,” Frontiers in Bioscience 8:d559-d576, May 2003. |
| Huang, W., et al., “Functionalization of Surfaces by Water-Accelerated Atom-Transfer Radical Polymerization of Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate and Subsequent Derivatization,” Macromolecules 35(4):1175-1179, Feb. 2002. |
| Hucknall, A., et al., “In Pursuit of Zero: Polymer Brushes That Resist the Adsorption of Proteins,” Advanced Materials 21(23):2441-2446, Jun. 2009. |
| Ishihara, K., et al., “Inhibition of Fibroblast Cell Adhesion on Substrate by Coating With 2-methacryloyloxyethyl Phosphorylcholine Polymers,” Journal of Biomaterials Science: Polymer Edition 10(10):1047-1061, Oct. 1999. |
| Ishihara, K. et al., “Protein Adsorption From Human Plasma Is Reduced on Phospholipid Polymers,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 25(11)1397-1407, Nov. 1991. |
| Jiang, S., et al., “Cationic Polycarboxybetaine Esters,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/989,073, filed Nov. 19,2007. |
| Jiang, S., and Z.Cao, “Ultralow-Fouling, Functionalizable, and Hydrolyzable Zwitterionic Materials and Their Derivatives for Biological Applications,” Advanced Materials 22(9):920-932, Mar. 2010. |
| Johnsson, B., et al., “Comparison of Methods for Immobilization to Carboxymethyl Dextran Sensor Surfaces by Analysis of the Specific Activity of Monoclonal Antibodies,” Journal of Molecular Recognition 8(1-2):125-131, Jan.-Apr. 1995. |
| Johnsson, B., et al., “Immobilization of Proteins to a Carboxymethyldextran-Modified Gold Surface for Biospecific Interaction Analysis in Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors,” Analytical Biochemistry 198(2):268-277, Nov. 1991. |
| Jones, D.M., et al., “Surface-Initiated Polymerizations in Aqueous Media: Effect of Initiator Density,” Langmuir 18(4):1265-1269, Feb. 2002. |
| Jogs, T.O., et al., “A Microarray Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Autoimmune Diagnostics,” Electrophoresis 21(13):2641-2650, Jul. 2000. |
| Kim, B.-S., et al., “All-Star Polymer Multilayers as pH-Responsive Nanofilms,” Macromolecules 42(1):368-375, Jan. 2009. |
| Kitano, H., et al., “Correlation Between the Structure of Water in the Vicinity of Carboxybetaine Polymers and Their Blood-Compatibility,” Langmuir 21(25):11932-11940, Dec. 2005. |
| Kizhakkedathu, J.N., et al., “Poly(oligo(ethylene glycol)acrylamide) Brushes by Surface Initiated Polymerization: Effect of Macromonomer Chain Length on Brush Growth and Protein Adsorption From Blood Plasma,” Langmuir 25(6):3794-3801, Mar. 2009. |
| Kolb, H.C., et al., “Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function From a Few Good Reactions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 40(11):2004-2021, Jun. 2001. |
| Krause, J.E., et al., “Photoiniferter-Mediated Polymerization of Zwitterionic Carboxybetaine Monomers for Low-Fouling and Functionalizable Surface Coatings,” Macromolecules 44(23):9213-9220, Dec. 2011. |
| Ladd, J., et al., “Zwitterionic Polymers Exhibiting High Resistance to Nonspecific Protein Adsorption From Human Serum and Plasma,” Biomacromolecules 9(5):1357-1361, May 2008. |
| Langer, R., “Drugs on Target,” Science 293(5527):58-59, Jul. 2001. |
| Lee, B.S., et al., “Surface-Initiated, Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization of Oligo(ethylene glycol) Methyl Ether Methacrylate and Subsequent Click Chemistry for Bioconjugation,” Biomacromolecules 8(2):744-749, Feb. 2007. |
| Lewis, A.L., “Phosphorylcholine-Based Polymers and Their Use in the Prevention of Biofouling,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 18(3-4):261-275, Oct. 2000. |
| Li, L., et al., “Protein Interactions With Oligo(ethylene glycol) (OEG) Self-Assembled Monolayers: OEG Stability, Surface Packing Density and Protein Adsorption,” Journal of Biomaterials Science: Polymer Edition 18(11):1415-1427, 2007. |
| Liaw, D.-J., et al., “Synthesis and Characteristics of the Poly(carboxybetaine)s and the Corresponding Cationic Polymers,” Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry 35(16):3527-3536, Nov. 1997. |
| Liedberg, B., and I. Lundström, “Principles of Biosensing With an Extended Coupling Matrix and Surface Plasmon Resonance,” Sensors and Actuators B 11(1-3):63-72, Mar. 1993. |
| Liotta, L.A., et al., “Protein Microarrays: Meeting Analytical Challenges for Clinical Applications,” Cancer Cell 3(4):317-325, Apr. 2003. |
| Löfås, S., et al., “Methods for Site Controlled Coupling to Carboxymethyldextran Surfaces in Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 10(9-10):813-822, 1995. |
| Löfås, S., and B. Johnsson, “A Novel Hydrogel Matrix on Gold Surfaces in Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Fast and Efficient Covalent Immobilization of Ligands,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications 21:1526-1528, 1990. |
| Lowe, A.B., and C.L. McCormick, “Synthesis and Solution Properties of Zwitterionic Polymers,” Chemical Reviews 102(11):4177-4189, Nov. 2002. |
| Luo, N., et al., “A Methacrylated Photoiniferter as a Chemical Basis for Microlithography: Micropatterning Based on Photografting Polymerization,” Macromolecules 36(18):6739-6745, Sep. 2003. |
| Ma, H., et al., “‘Non-Fouling’ Oligo(ethylene glycol)-Functionalized Polymer Brushes Synthesized by Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization,” Advanced Materials 16(4):338-341, Feb. 2004. |
| Malmqvist, M., “Biospecific Interaction Analysis Using Biosensor Technology,” Nature 361(6408):186-187, Jan. 1993. |
| Masson, J.-F., et al., “Biocompatible Polymers for Antibody Support on Gold Surfaces,” Talanta 67(5):918-925, Oct. 2005. |
| Masson, J.-F., et al., “Preparation of Analyte-Sensitive Polymeric Supports for Biochemical Sensors,” Talanta 64(3):716-725, Oct. 2004. |
| Matsuda, T., “Photoiniferter-Driven Precision Surface Graft Microarchitectures for Biomedical Applications,” in R. Jordan (ed.), “Surface-Initiated Polymerization,” Springer, Berlin, 2006, vol. 197, pp. 67-106. |
| Matyjaszewski, K., and N.V. Tsarevsky, “Nanostructured Functional Materials Prepared by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization,” Nature: Chemistry 1(4):276-288, Jul. 2009. |
| Matyjaszewski, K, et al., “Polymers at Interfaces: Using Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization in the Controlled Growth of Homopolymers and Block Copolymers From Silicon Surfaces in the Absence of Untethered Sacrificial Initiator,” Macromolecules 32(26):8716-8724, Dec. 1999. |
| Mendelsohn, J.D., et al., “Fabrication of Microporous Thin Films From Polyelectrolyte Multilayers,” Langmuir 16(11):5017-5023, May 2000. |
| Ostuni, E., et al., “Self-Assembled Monolayers That Resist the Adsorption of Proteins and the Adhesion of Bacterial and Mammalian Cells,” Langmuir 17(20):6336-6343, Oct. 2001. |
| Ostuni, E., et al., “A Survey of Structure-Property Relationships of Surfaces That Resist the Adsorption of Protein,” Langmuir 17(18):5605-5620, Sep. 2001. |
| Otsu, T., “Iniferter Concept and Living Radical Polymerization,” Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry 38(12):2121-2136, Jun. 2000. |
| Otsu, T., and M. Yoshida, “Role of Initiator-Transfer Agent-Terminator (Iniferter) in Radical Polymerizations: Polymer Design by Organic Disulfides as Iniferters,” Die Makromolekulare Chemie, Rapid Communications 3(2)127-132, Feb. 1982. |
| Otsuka, et al., “PEGylated Nanoparticles for Biological and Pharmaceutical Applications,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 55(3):403-419, Feb. 2003. |
| Prime, K.L., and G.M. Whitesides, “Self-Assembled Organic Monolayers: Model Systems for Studying Adsorption of Proteins at Surfaces,” Science 252(5009):1164-1167, May 1991. |
| Pyun, J., et al., “Synthesis of Polymer Brushes Using Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization,” Macromolecular Rapid Communations 24(18):1043-1059, Dec. 2003. |
| Rahane, S.B., et al., “Impact of Added Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide Deactivator on the Kinetics of Growth and Reinitiation of Poly(methyl methacrylate) Brushes Made by Surface-Initiated Photoiniferter-Mediated Photopolymerization,” Macromolecules 39(26):8987-8991, Dec. 2006. |
| Rahane, S.B., et al., “Kinetic Modeling of Surface-Initiated Photoiniferter-Mediated Photopolymerization in Presence of Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide,” Macromolecules 41(24):9612-9618, Dec. 2008. |
| Rahane, S.B., et al., “Kinetics of Surface-Initiated Photoiniferter-Mediated Photopolymerization,” Macromolecules 38(20):8202-8210, Oct. 2005. |
| Ratner, B.D., and S.J. Bryant, “Biomaterials: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 6:41-75, Aug. 2004. |
| Rodriguez-Emmenegger, C., et al., “Polymer Brushes Showing Non-Fouling in Blood Plasma Challenge the Currently Accepted Design of Protein Resistant Surfaces,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications 32(13):952-957, Jul. 2011. |
| Schoen, F.J., and A.S. Hoffman, “Implant and Device Failure,” in B.D. Ratner et al. (eds.), “Biomaterials Science,” 2nd ed., Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004, Chap. 9.3, pp. 760-765. |
| Shapiro, M.G., et al., “Directed Evolution of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for Noninvasive Imaging of Dopamine,” Nature: Biotechnology 28(3):264-270, Mar. 2010. |
| Singh, N., et al., “The Role of Independently Variable Grafting Density and Layer Thickness of Polymer Nanolayers on Peptide Adsorption and Cell Adhesion,” Biomaterials 28(5):763-761, Feb. 2007. |
| Spisak, S., et al., “Protein Microchips in Biomedicine and Biomarker Discovery,” Electrophoresis 28(23):4261-4273, Dec. 2007. |
| Toomey, R., and M. Tirrell, “Functional Polymer Brushes in Aqueous Media From Self-Assembled and Surface-Initiated Polymers,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 59:493-517, May 2008. |
| Tsai, W.-B., et al., “Human Plasma Fibrinogen Adsorption and Platelet Adhesion to Polystyrene,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 44(2):130-139, Feb. 1999. |
| Turgman-Cohen, S., and J. Genzer, “Computer Simulation of Controlled Radical Polymerization: Effect of Chain Confinement Due to Initiator Grafting Density and Solvent Quality in ‘Grafting From’ Method,” Macromolecules 43(22):9567-9577, Nov. 2010. |
| Vaisocherová, H., et al., “Functionalizable Surface Platform With Reduced Nonspecific Protein Adsorption From Full Blood Plasma—Material Selection and Protein Immobilization Optimization,” Biosensors and Siolectronics 24(7):1924-1930, Mar. 2009. |
| Voros, J., “The Density and Refractive Index of Adsorbing Protein Layers,” Biophysical Journal 87(1):553-561, Jul. 2004. |
| Wang, X., et al., “Length Scale Heterogeneity in Lateral Gradients of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Polymer Brushes Prepared by Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Coupled With In-Plane Electrochemical Potential Gradients,” Langmuir 22(2):817-823, Jan. 2006. |
| Yancey, P.H., et al., “Living With Water Stress: Evolution of Osmolyte Systems,” Science 217(4566):1214-1222, Sep. 1982. |
| Yang, W., et al., “Pursuing ‘Zero’ Protein Adsorption of Poly(carboxybetaine) From Undiluted Blood Serum and Plasma,” Langmuir 25(19):11911-11916, Oct. 2009. |
| Yu, Q., et al., “Detection of Low-Molecular-Weight Domoic Acid Using Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor,” Sensors and Actuators B 107(1):193-201, May 2005. |
| Zhang, Z., et al., “Dual-Functional Biomimetic Materials: Nonfouling Poly(carboxybetaine) With Active Functional Groups for Protein Immobilization,” Biomacromolecules 7(12):3311-3315, Dec. 2006. |
| Zhang, Z., et al., “Nonfouling Behavior of Polycarboxybetaine-Grafted Surfaces: Structural and Environmental Effects,” Biomacromolecules 9(10):2686-2692, Oct. 2008. |
| Zhao, C., et al., “Effect of Film Thickness on the Antifouling Performance of Poly(hydroxy-functional methacrylates) Grafted Surfaces,” Langmuir 27(8):4906-4913, Apr. 2011. |
| Cao, A., et al., “Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Prepared From Amphiphilic PLGA Zwitterionic Block Copolymers With Sharp Contrast in Polarity Between Two Blocks,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 49(22):3771-3776, May 2010. |
| Cheng, J., et al., “Formulation of Functionalized PLGA-PEG Nanoparticles for in Vivo Targeted Drug Delivery,” Biomaterials 28(5):869-876, Feb. 2007. |
| Decision of Rejection, mailed Mar. 24, 2015, for Application No. JP 2012-538071, 6 pages. |
| Dimitrov, I., et al., “Thermosensitive Water-Soluble Copolymers With Doubly Responsive Reversibly Interacting Entities,” Progress in Polymer Science 32(11):1275-1343, Nov. 2007. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2014, for Application No. EP 10829256.6, 10 pages. |
| First Japanese Office Action, dated Apr. 22, 2014, for Application No. JP 2012-538071, 9 pages. |
| Harris, J.M., “Introduction to Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications of Poly(Ethylene Glycol),” in J.M. Harris (ed.), “Poly(ethylene glycol) Chemistry,” Plenum, New York, 1992, Chap. 1, pp. 1-14. |
| Hoffman, A.S., and B.D. Ratner, “2.13 Nonfouling Surfaces,” in B.D. Ratner et al. (eds.), “Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine,” 2nd ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 197-201. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 12, 2008, for International Application No. PCT/US2007/089236, filed Dec. 31, 2007, 9 pages. |
| Juo, P.-S., “Concise Dictionary of Biomedicine and Molecular Biology,” 2nd ed., CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2002, p. 173. |
| Notification of the First Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2013, for Application No. CN 201080055964.6, filed Nov. 8, 2010, 8 pages. |
| Tuzar, Z., et al., “Micelles of Hydrophilic-Hydrophobic Poly(Sulfobetaine)-Based Block Copolymers,” Macromolecules 30(8)2509-2512, Apr. 1997. |
| Zhang, L.M., et al., “New Water-Soluble Ampholylic Polysaccharides for Oilfield Drilling Treatment: A Preliminary Study,” Carbohydrate Polymers 44(3):255-260, Mar. 2001. |
| First Japanese Office Action, dated May 2, 2012, for Application No. JP 2009-544325, 4 pages. |
| Adams, E.W., et al., “Oligosaccharide and Glycoprotein Microarrays as Tools in HIV-Glycobiology: A Detailed Analysis of Glycan Dependent gp120/Protein Interactions,” Chemistry & Biology 11(6):875-881, Jun. 2004. |
| Adden, N., et al., “Phosphonic Acid Monolayers for Binding of Bioactive Molecules to Titanium Surfaces,” Langmuir 22(19):8197-8204, Aug. 2006. |
| Almeida, V.R., et al., “Guiding and Confining Light in Void Nanostructure,” Optics Letters 29(11):1209-1211, Jun. 2004. |
| Almeida, V.R., et al., “Nanotaper for Compact Mode Conversion,” Optics Letters 28(15):1302-1304, Aug. 2003. |
| Aprikian, P., et al., “Interdomain Interaction in the FimH Adhesin of Escherichia coil Regulates the Affinity to Mannose,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 282(32):23437-23446, Aug. 2007. |
| Armani, A.M., et al., “Label-Free, Single-Molecule Detection With Optical Microcavities,” Science 317(5839)183-787, Aug. 2007. |
| Baehr-Jones, T., et al., “High-Q Ring Resonators in Thin Silicon-on-Insulator,” Applied Physics Letters 85(16):3346-3347, Oct. 2004. |
| Baehr-Jones, T., et al., “Nonlinear Polymer-Clad Silicon Slot Waveguide Modulator With a Half Wave Voltage of 0.25 V,” Applied Physics Letters 92(16):163303-1-163303-3, Apr. 2008. |
| Baehr-Jones, T., et al., “Optical Modulation and Detection in Slotted Silicon Waveguides,” Optics Express 13(14):5216-5226, Jul. 2005. |
| Boyraz, O., and B. Jalali, “Demonstration of a Silicon Raman Laser,” Optics Express 12(21):5269-5273, Oct. 2004. |
| Browne, M.M., “Protein Adsorption Onto Polystyrene Surfaces Studied by XPS and AFM,” Surface Science 553(1-3):155-167, Mar. 2004. |
| Canadian Office Action and Examination Search Report, dated Dec. 12, 2014, issued in Canadian Application No. 2.872.378, filed Jul. 20, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Castner, D.G., and B.D. Ratner, “Biomedical Surface Science: Foundations to Frontiers,” Surface Science 500(1-3):28-60, Mar. 2002. |
| Cattani-Scholz, A., et al., “Organophosphonate-Based PNA-Functionalization of Silicon Nanowires for Label-Free DNA Detection,” ACS Nano 2(8):1653-1660, Jul. 2008. |
| Chao, C.-Y., et al., “Polymer Microring Resonators for Biochemical Sensing Applications,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 12(1)134-142, Jan.-Feb. 2006. |
| Coen, M.C., et al., “Adsorption and Bioactivity of Protein A on Silicon Surfaces Studied by AFM and XPS,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 233(2):180-189, Jan. 2001. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 20, 2015, issued in corresponding European Application No. 12 814 998.6, filed Jul. 20, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Cook, A.D., et al., “Characterization and Development of RGD-Peptide-Modified Poly(lactic acid-co-lysine) as an Interactive, Resorbable Biomaterial,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 35(4):513-523, Jun. 1997. |
| Crocker, P. R., et al., “Siglecs and Their Roles in the Immune System,” Nature Reviews Immunology 7(4):255-266, Apr. 2007. |
| Davis, S.J., and J.F. Watts, “Interfacial Chemistry of Adhesive Joint Failure: An Investigation by Small Area XPS, Imaging XPS and TOF-SIMS,” Journal of Materials Chemistry 6(3):479-493, Mar. 1996. |
| De Vos, K., et al., “Silicon-on-Insulator Microring Resonator for Sensitive and Label-Free Biosensing,” Optics Express 15(12):7610-7615, Jun. 2007. |
| Dhayal, M., and D.M. Ratner, “XPS and SPR Analysis of Glycoarray Surface Density,” Langmuir 25(4):2181-2187, Jan. 2009. |
| Disney, M.D., and P.H. Seeberger, “Aminoglycoside Microarrays To Explore Interactions of Antibiotics With RNAs and Proteins,” Chemistry 10(13):3308-3314, Jul. 2004. |
| Disney, M.D., and P.H. Seeberger, “The Use of Carbohydrate Microarrays to Study Carbohydrate-Cell Interactions and to Detect Pathogens,” Chemistry & Biology 11(12):1701-1707, Dec. 2004. |
| Dufrêne, Y.F., et al., “X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis of Whole Cells and Isolated Cell Walls of Gram-Positive Bacteria: Comparison With Biochemical Analysis,” Journal of Bacteriology 179(4):1023-1028, Feb. 1997. |
| European Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2015, issued in European Application No. 12814998.6, filed Jul. 20, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Kirk, J.T., et al., “Serologic and Phenotypic Analysis of Blood Types via Silicon Nanophotonics,” Blood 124(21):1565-1565, Dec. 2014. |
| Fan, X., et al., “Overview of Novel Integrated Optical Ring Resonator Bio/Chemical Sensors,” Proceedings of SPIE 6452:64520M-1-64520M-20, Feb. 2007. |
| Fang, A.W., et al., “Electrically Pumped Hybrid AlGaInAs-Silicon Evanescent Laser,” Optics Express 14(20):9203-9210, Oct. 2006. |
| Fathpour, S., et al., “Energy Harvesting in Silicon Raman Amplifiers,” Applied Physics Letters 89:061109-1-061109-3, Aug. 2006. |
| Karlsson, K.-A., “Bacterium-Host Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions and Pathogenicity,” Biochemical Society Transactions 27(4):471-474, Aug. 1999. |
| Foster, M.A., et al., “Broad-Band Optical Parametric Gain on a Silicon Photonic Chip,” Nature 441(7096):960-963, Jun. 2006. |
| Fukui, S., et al., “Oligosaccharide Microarrays for High-Throughput Detection and Specificity Assignments of Carbohydrate-Protein Interactions,” Nature Biotechnology 20(10):1011-1017, Oct. 2002. |
| Gawalt, E.S., et al., “Bonding Organics to Ti Alloys: Facilitating Human Osteoblast Attachment and Spreading on Surgical Implant Materials,” Langmuir 19(1):200-204, Jan. 2003. |
| Gohring, J.T., and X. Fan, “Label Free Detection of CD4+ and COB+ T Cells Using the Optofluidic Ring Resonator,” Sensors 10(6):5798-5808, Jun. 2010. |
| Gong, P., et al., “Hybridization Behavior of Mixed DNA/Alkylthiol Monolayers on Gold: Characterization by Surface Plasmon Resonance and 32P Radiometric Assay,” Analytical Chemistry 78(10):3326-3334, May 2006. |
| Gunn, C., “CMOS Photonics™ Technology: Enabling Optical Interconnects,” Luxtera, Inc., Jan. 2012, <http://www.hotchips.org/archives/hc17/2_Mon/HC17.S3/HC17.S3T1.pdf> [retrieved Sep. 2015], 26 pages. |
| Guo, Y., et al., “Structural Basis for Distinct Ligand-Binding and Targeting Properties of the Receptors DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 11(7):591-598, Jul. 2004. |
| Hanson, E.L., et al., “Bonding Self-Assembled, Compact Organophosphonate Monolayers to the Native Oxide Surface of Silicon,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 125(51):16074-16080, Nov. 2003. |
| Herne, T.M., and M.J. Tarlov, “Characterization of Probe Immobilized on Gold Surface,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 119(38):8916-8920, Sep. 1997. |
| Hess, J.R., and J.B. Holcomb, “Transfusion Practice in Military Trauma,” Transfusion Medicine 18(3):143-150, Jun. 2008. |
| Hochberg, M., et al., “Terahertz All-Optical Modulation in a Silicon-Polymer Hybrid System,” Nature Materials 5(9):703-709, Sep. 2006. |
| Holcomb, J.B., “Optimal Use of Blood Products in Severely Injured Trauma Patients,” Hematology 2010(1):465-469, Dec. 2010. |
| Hölzl, M., et al., “Protein-Resistant Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold With Latent Aldehyde Functions,” Langmuir 23(10):5571-5577, May 2007. |
| Houseman, B.T., and M. Mrksich, “Carbohydrate Arrays for the Evaluation of Protein Binding and Enzymatic Modification,” Chemistry & Biology 9(4):443-454, Apr. 2002. |
| Houseman, B.T., et al., “Maleimide-Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers for the Preparation of Peptide and carbohydrate Biochips,” Langmuir 19(5):1522-1531, Mar. 2003. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 30, 2013, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/047745, filed Jul. 20, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Kansas, G.S., “Selectins and Their Ligands: Current Concepts and Controversies,” Blood 88(9):3259-3287, Nov. 1996. |
| Ksendozov, A., and Y. Lin, “Integrated Optics Ring-Resonator Sensors for Protein Detection,” Optics Letters 30(24):3344-3346, Dec. 2005. |
| Kumari, K., et al., “Receptor Binding Specificity of Recent Human H3N2 Influenza Viruses,” Virology Journal 4:42, May 2007, 12 pages. |
| Lenigk, R., et al., “Surface Characterization of a Silicon-Chip-Based DNA Microarray,” Langmuir 17(8):2497-2501, Mar. 2001. |
| Léonard, D., et al., “ToF-SIMS and XPS Study of Photoactivatable Reagents Designed for Surface Glycoengineering. Part III. 5-Carboxamidopentyl-N-[m-[3-(trifluoromethyl)diazirin-3-yl]phenyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl]-(1->4 )-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside (Lactose Aryl Diazirine) on Diamond,” Surface and Interface Analysis 31(6):457-464, Jun. 2001. |
| Li, L., et al., “Harnessing Optical Forces in Integrated Photonic Circuits,” Nature 456(7221):480-484, Nov. 2008. |
| Limpoco, F.T., and R.C. Bailey, “Real-Time Monitoring of Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Using Silicon Photonic Microring Resonators: Implications for Combinatorial Screening of Polymer Brush Growth Conditions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133(38):14864-14867, Sep. 2011. |
| Liu, A., et al., “A High-Speed Silicon Optical Modulator Based on a Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitor,” Nature 427(6975):615-618, Feb. 2004. |
| Liu, A., et al., “Optical Amplification and Lasing by Stimulated Raman Scattering in Silicon Waveguides,” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology 24(3):1440-1455, Mar. 2006. |
| Liu, J., et al., “Design of Monolithically Integrated GeSi Electroabsorption Modulators and Photodetectors on an SOI Platform,” Optics Express 15(2):623-628, Jan. 2007. |
| Midwood, K.S., et al., “Easy and Efficient Bonding of Biomolecules to an Oxide Surface of Silicon,” Langmuir 20(13):5501-5505, May 2004. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,585, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,128, 8 pages. |
| Noto, M., et al., “Detection of Protein Orientation on the Silica Microsphere Surface Using Transverse Electric/Transverse Magnetic Whispering Gallery Modes,” Biophysical Journal 92(12):4466-4472, Jun. 2007. |
| Quan, Q., et al., “Photonic Crystal Nanobeam Cavity Strongly Coupled to the Feeding Waveguide,” Applied Physics Letters 96(20):203102-1-203102-3, May 2010. |
| Ramachandran, A., et al., “A Universal Biosensing Platform Based on Optical Micro-Ring Resonators,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 23(7):939-944, Feb. 2008. |
| Ratner, D.M., et al., “Probing Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions With Microarrays of Synthetic Oligosaccharides,” ChemBioChem 5(3):379-383, Mar. 2004. |
| Ratner, D.M., et al., “Tools for Glycomics: Mapping Interactions of Carbohydrates in Biological Systems,” ChemBioChem 5(10):1375-1383, Oct. 2004. |
| Roelkens, G., et al., “Efficient Silicon-on-Insulator Fiber Coupler Fabricated Using 248-nm-Deep UV Lithography,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 17(12):2613-2615, Dec. 2005. |
| Roelkens, G., et al., “High Efficiency Grating Coupler Between Silicon-on-Insulator Waveguides and Perfectly Vertical Optical Fibers,” Optics Letters 32(11):1495-1497, Jun. 2007. |
| Rong, H., et al., “An All-Silicon Raman Laser,” Nature 433(7023):292-294, Jan. 2005. |
| Sabbatini, L., and P.G. Zambonin, “XPS and SIMS Surface Chemical Analysis of Some Important Classes of Polymeric Biomaterials,” Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 81(3):285-301, Sep. 1996. |
| Sacchettini, J.C., et al., “Multivalent Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions. A New Paradigm for Supermolecular Assembly and Signal Transduction,” Biochemistry 40(10):3009-3015, Mar. 2001. |
| Salminen, A., et al., “Inhibition of P-Fimbriated Escherichia coli Adhesion by Multivalent Galabiose Derivatives Studied by a Live-Bacteria Application of Surface Plasmon Resonance,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 60(3):495-501, Sep. 2007. |
| Sauer, U., et al., “Evaluation of Substrate Performance for a Microbial Diagnostic Microarray Using a Four Parameter Ranking,” Analytica Chimica Acta 632(2):240-246, Jan. 2009. |
| Schmidt, B., et al., “Optical Trapping Platform Based on Highly Confining Silicon Waveguiding Structures With Microfluidics,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science (CLEO/QELS), San Jose, Calif., May 4-9, 2008, OSA Technical Digest (CD), Optical Society of America, Paper CThQ3, 2 pages. |
| Sherwood-Droz, N., et al., “Optical 4x4 Hitless Silicon Router for Optical Networks-on-Chip (NoC),” Optics Express 16(20):15915-15922, Sep. 2008. |
| Silverman, B.M., et al., “Comparative Properties of Siloxane vs. Phosphonate Monolayers on a Key Titanium Alloy,” Langmuir 21(1):225-228, Jan. 2005. |
| Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Jun. 27, 2016, issued in corresponding European Application No. 12 814 998.6, filed Jul. 20, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Sun, R., et al., “Horizontal Single and Multiple Slot Waveguides: Optical Transmission at λ=1550 nm,” Optics Express 15(26):17967-17972, Dec. 2007. |
| Tanabe, T., et al., “Trapping and Delaying Photons for One Nanosecond in an Ultrasmall High-Q Photonic-Crystal Nanocavity,” Nature Photonics 1(1):49-52, Jan. 2007. |
| Thomas, W., “Catch Bonds in Adhesion,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 10:39-57, Aug. 2008. |
| Vollmer, F. et al., “Multiplexed DNA Quantification by Spectroscopic Shill of Two Microsphere Cavities,” . Biophysical Journal 85(3):1974-1979, Sep. 2003. |
| Vollmer, F., et al., “Protein Detection by Optical Shift of a Resonant Microcavity,” Applied Physics Letters 80(21):4057-4059, May 2002. |
| Von Muhlen, M.G., et al., “Label-Free Biomarker Sensing in Undiluted Serum With Suspended Microchannel Resonators,” Analytical Chemistry 82(5):1905-1910, Mar. 2010. |
| Wang, D., et al., “Carbohydrate Microarrays for the Recognition of Cross-Reactive Molecular Markers of Microbes and Host Cells,” Nature Biotechnology 20(3):275-281, Mar. 2002. |
| Wang, H., et al., “Probing the Orientation of Surface-Immobilized Immunoglobulin G by Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry.” Langmuir 20(5):1877-1887, Jan. 2004. |
| Wang, Y., and M. Lieberman, “Growth of Ultrasmooth Octadecyltrichlorosilane Self-Assembled Monolayers on SiO2,” Langmuir 19(4):1159-1167, Jan. 2003. |
| Washburn, A.L., and R.C. Bailey, “Photonics-on-a-Chip: Recent Advances in Integrated Waveguides as Enabling Detection Elements for Real-World, Lab-on-a-Chip Biosensing Applications,” Analyst 136(2):227-236, Jan. 2011. |
| Xiao, S.-J., et al., “Covalent Attachment of Cell-Adhesive Peptides Containing (Arg-Gly-Asp) Sequences to Titanium Surfaces,” Langmuir 14(19):5507-5516, Aug. 1998. |
| Xu, Q., and M. Lipson, “All-Optical Logic Based on Silicon Micro-Ring Resonators,” Optics Express 15(3):924-929, Feb. 2007. |
| Xu, Q., et al., “Breaking the Delay-Bandwidth Limit in a Photonic Structure,” Nature Physics 3(6):406-410, Apr. 2007. |
| Xu, Q., et al., “Experimental Demonstration of Guiding and Confining Light in Nanometer-Size Low-Refractive-Index Material,” Optics Letters 29(14):1626-1628, Jul. 2004. |
| Yonzon, C.R., et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Localized and Propagating Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors: The Binding of Concanavalin A to a Monosaccharide Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 126(39):12669-12676, Sep. 2004. |
| Yoshida, Y., et al., “Evidence of Chemical Bonding at Biomaterial-Hard Tissue Interfaces,” Journal of Dental Research 79(2):709-714, Feb. 2000. |
| Yu, R.K., and M. Yanagisawa, “Glycobiology of Neural Stem Cells,” CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug Targets 5(4):415-423, Aug. 2006. |
| Zhao, Y.-D., et al., “DNA-Modified Electrodes. Part 4: Optimization of Covalent Immobilization of DNA on Self-Assembled Monolayers,” Talanta 49(4):751-756, Jul. 1999. |
| Zhu, H., et al., “Opto-Fluidic Micro-Ring Resonator for Sensitive Label-Free Viral Detection,” Analyst 133(3):356-360, Mar. 2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130244249 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61588785 | Jan 2012 | US |
