Patent Grant
8402219
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosures, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention disclosed herein relates generally to performing storage operations on electronic data in a computer network. More particularly, the present invention relates to integrating storage-related operations for a computer network according to a specified hierarchy of storage operation cells.
2. Description of the Related Art
Current storage management systems employ a number of different methods perform storage operations on electronic data. For example, data can be stored as a primary copy, as a snapshot copy, as a backup copy, a hierarchical storage management copy (“HSM”), as an archive copy, and as other types of copies.
A primary copy of data generally comprises the production copy or other “live” version of the data used by a software application and in the native format of that application. A snapshot copy generally comprises a copy of the primary copy data at a certain point in time and is usually stored on a magnetic media storage device or other readily accessible storage device.
A backup copy is a point-in-time copy of the primary copy data stored in a backup format as opposed to in native application format. For example, a backup copy may be stored in a backup format that is optimized for compression and efficient long-term storage.
An HSM copy is a copy of the primary copy data, but generally comprises only a subset of the primary copy data that meets a certain criteria and is usually stored in a format other than the native application format. For example, an HSM copy might comprise only that data from the primary copy is larger than a given size threshold or older than a given age threshold and that is stored in a backup format. Often, HSM data is removed from the primary copy, but a stub is stored in the primary copy to indicate where to locate the data. When a user requests access to the HSM data that has been removed or migrated, systems use the stub to locate the data and make recovery of the data appear transparent even though the HSM data may be stored at a location different from the remaining primary copy data.
An archive copy is generally similar to an HSM copy, however, the data satisfying the criteria for removal from the primary copy is generally completely removed and no stub is left in the primary copy to indicate the location where the data has been moved. Archive copies of data are generally stored in a backup format or other non-native application format.
Examples of various types of data and copies of data are further described in the above-referenced related applications which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. One example of a system that performs storage operations on electronic data that produce such copies of data is the Galaxy storage management system by CommVault Systems of Oceanport, N.J.
The Galaxy system leverages a modular storage management architecture that includes, among other things, storage manager components, client or data agent components, and media agent components as further described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/460,234 which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The Galaxy system also can be hierarchically configured into backup cells to store and retrieve backup copies of electronic data as further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/354,058, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,282, issued Jul. 1, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
While the Galaxy system offers a number of advantages over other systems, backup cells are still only hierarchically configured to perform backups of data and not directed to performing other types of storage operations. There is thus a need for systems and methods to hierarchically configure backup cells to perform other types of storage operations including snapshot copies, HSM copies, archive copies, and other types of copies of electronic data.
The present invention addresses, among other things, the problems discussed above performing storage operations on electronic data in a computer network.
In accordance with some aspects of the present invention, a computerized system is provided for performing storage operations using hierarchically configured storage operation cells, the system comprising: a first storage manager component; and a first storage operation cell, the first storage operation cell having a second storage manager component directed to performing storage operations in the first storage operation cell; wherein the first storage manager component is programmed to instruct the second storage manager regarding performance of storage operations in the first storage operation cell.
In some embodiments, the first storage manager component comprises a master storage manager component. The first storage manager component may comprise a component of a storage operation cell other than the first storage operation cell or alternatively may not comprise a component of a storage operation cell.
In some embodiments, the first storage manager component controls the second storage manager component during performance of storage operations in the first storage operation cell. The first storage operation cell may include a media agent component and a data agent component and in some embodiments, the first storage manager component is programmed to directly control at least one of the media agent and the data agent component during performance of storage operations in the first storage operation cell. The first storage manager component may also bypass the second storage manager component to directly control at least one of the media agent or the data agent component during performance of storage operations in the first storage operation cell.
In some embodiments of the invention, the first storage manager component instructs the second storage manager component regarding a time to perform a storage operation or a type of storage operation to perform, such as a snapshot copy operation, an HSM copy operation, or an archive copy operation.
In some embodiments, the first storage operation cell is organized according to a functional criteria, such as a type of storage operation performed by the first storage operation cell. In other embodiments, the first storage operation cell is organized according to a geographic criteria, such as a physical location of one or more components of the first storage operation cell.
In some embodiments, the second storage manager component is programmed to communicate status information regarding the first storage operation cell to the first storage manager component. Exemplary status information includes information regarding the availability of a component of the first storage operation cell, information regarding resource usage status by the first storage operation cell, such as usage of a storage device associated with the first storage operation cell, usage of a network pathway by components associated with the first storage operation cell, information regarding the status of one or more storage operations previously performed by the first storage operation cell, such as the status of one or more storage operations scheduled to be performed by the first storage operation cell, and other types of status information.
In some embodiments, the system comprises a second storage operation cell, the second storage operation cell having a third storage manager component directed to performing storage operations in the second storage operation cell, wherein the first storage manager component is programmed to instruct the third storage manager regarding performance of storage operations in the second storage operation cell. In some embodiments, the second storage manager component is also programmed to instruct the third storage manager regarding performance of storage operations in the second storage operation cell. In some embodiments, the second storage manager component is programmed to communicate status information regarding the first storage operation cell to the first storage manager component and the third storage manager component is programmed to communicate status information regarding the second storage operation cell to the first storage manager component. The first storage manager component is programmed to present a report of summary information regarding the status information communicated by the first storage operation cell and the status information communicated by the second storage operation cell.
In some embodiments, the second storage manager component is programmed to instruct the third storage manager regarding performance of storage operations in the second storage operation cell if a user of the second storage manager satisfies an access criteria for access to the second storage operation cell.
The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, in which like references are intended to refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which:
With reference to
A storage operation cell generally includes combinations of hardware and software components directed to performing storage operations on electronic data. Exemplary storage operation cells according to embodiments of the invention include CommCells as embodied in the QNet storage management system and the QiNetix storage management system by CommVault Systems of Oceanport, N.J. Storage operation cells generally include a storage manager 100, a data agent 95, a media agent 105, a storage device 115, and, according to some embodiments, other components as further described herein. According to some embodiments of the invention, storage operations cells are related to backup cells and provide all of the functionality of backup cells as further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/354,058, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,282, issued Jul. 1, 2008, however, storage operation cells also perform additional types of storage operations and provide other types of storage management functionality which are not generally offered by backup cells. According to embodiments of the invention, additional storage operations performed by storage operation cells include creation, storage, retrieval, and migration of primary copies, snapshot copies, backup copies, HSM copies, archive copies, and other types of copies of electronic data. In some embodiments, storage operation cells also provide an integrated management console for users or system processes to interface with to perform storage operations on electronic data as further described herein.
A data agent 95 is generally a software module that is generally responsible for archiving, migrating, and recovering data of a client computer 85 stored in an information store 90 or other memory location. Each client computer 85 has at least one data agent 95 and the system can support many client computers 85. The system provides a plurality of data agents 95 each of which is intended to backup, migrate, and recover data associated with a different application. For example, different individual data agents 95 may be designed to handle Microsoft Exchange data, Lotus Notes data, Microsoft Windows 2000 file system data, Microsoft Active Directory Objects data, and other types of data known in the art.
If a client computer 85 has two or more types of data, one data agent 95 is generally required for each data type to archive, migrate, and restore the client computer 85 data. For example, to backup, migrate, and restore all of the data on a Microsoft Exchange 2000 server, the client computer 85 would use one Microsoft Exchange 2000 Mailbox data agent 95 to backup the Exchange 2000 mailboxes, one Microsoft Exchange 2000 Database data agent 95 to backup the Exchange 2000 databases, one Microsoft Exchange 2000 Public Folder data agent 95 to backup the Exchange 2000 Public Folders, and one Microsoft Windows 2000 File System data agent 95 to backup the client computer's 85 file system. These data agents 95 would be treated as four separate data agents 95 by the system even though they reside on the same client computer 85.
The storage manager 100 is generally a software module or application that coordinates and controls storage operations performed by the storage operation cell. The storage manager 100 communicates with all elements of the storage operation cell including client computers 85, data agents 95, media agents 105, and storage devices 115, to initiate and manage system backups, migrations, and recoveries. The storage manager 100 also communicates with other storage operation cells as further described herein.
The storage manager 100 includes a jobs agent 120 software module which monitors the status of all storage operations that have been performed, that are being performed, or that are scheduled to be performed by the storage operation cell. The jobs agent 120 is communicatively coupled with an interface agent 125 software module. The interface agent 125 provides presentation logic, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), an application program interface (“API”), or other interface by which users and system processes can retrieve information about the status of storage operations and issue instructions to the storage operations cell regarding performance of those storage operations as further described herein. For example, a user might modify the schedule of a number of pending snapshot copies or other types of copies. As another example, a user might use the GUI to view the status of all storage operation currently pending in all storage operation cells or the status of particular components in a storage operation cell.
The storage manager 100 also includes a management agent 130 software module. The management agent 130 generally provides an interface with other management components 100 in other storage operations cells through which information and instructions regarding storage operations may be conveyed. For example, in some embodiments as further described herein, a management agent 130 in first storage operation cell can communicate with a management agent 130 in a second storage operation cell regarding the status of storage operations in the second storage operation cell. In some embodiments, a management agent 130 in first storage operation cell can communicate with a management agent 130 in a second storage operation cell to control the storage manager 100 (and other components) of the second storage operation cell via the management agent 130 contained in the storage manager 100 for the second storage operation cell. In other embodiments, the management agent 130 in the first storage operation cell communicates directly with and controls the components in the second storage management cell and bypasses the storage manager 100 in the second storage management cell. Storage operation cells can thus be organized hierarchically as further described herein.
A media agent 105 is generally a software module that conducts data, as directed by the storage manager 100, between the client computer 85 and one or more storage devices 115 such as a tape library, a magnetic media storage device, an optical media storage device, or other storage device. The media agent 105 is communicatively coupled with and controls the storage device 1115. For example, the media agent 105 might instruct the storage device 115 to use a robotic arm or other means to load or eject a media cartridge, and to archive, migrate, or restore application specific data. The media agent 105 generally communicates with the storage device 115 via a local bus such as a SCSI adaptor. In some embodiments, the storage device 115 is communicatively coupled to the data agent 105 via a Storage Area Network (“SAN”).
Each media agent 105 maintain an index cache 110 which stores index data the system generates during backup, migration, and restore storage operations as further described herein. For example, storage operations for Microsoft Exchange data generate index data. Index data provides the system with an efficient mechanism for locating user files for recovery operations. This index data is generally stored with the data backed up to the storage device 115, and the media agent 105 that controls the storage operation also writes an additional copy of the index data to its index cache 110. The data in the media agent 105 index cache 110 is thus readily available to the system for use in storage operations and other activities without having to be first retrieved from the storage device 115.
The storage manager 100 also maintains an index cache 110. Index data is also used to indicate logical associations between components of the system, user preferences, management tasks, and other useful data. For example, the storage manager 100 might use its index cache 110 to track logical associations between media agents 105 and storage devices 115.
Index caches 110 typically reside on their corresponding storage component's hard disk or other fixed storage device. Like any cache, the index cache 110 has finite capacity and the amount of index data that can be maintained directly corresponds to the size of that portion of the disk that is allocated to the index cache 110. In one embodiment, the system manages the index cache 110 on a least recently used (“LRU”) basis as known in the art. When the capacity of the index cache 110 is reached, the system overwrites those files in the index cache 110 that have been least recently accessed with the new index data. In some embodiments, before data in the index cache 110 is overwritten, the data is copied to an index cache 110 copy in a storage device 115. If a recovery operation requires data that is no longer stored in the index cache 110, such as in the case of a cache miss, the system recovers the index data from the index cache 110 copy stored in the storage device 115.
In some embodiments, components of the system may reside and execute on the same computer. In some embodiments, a client computer 85 component such as a data agent 95, a media agent 105, or a storage manager 100 coordinates and directs local archiving, migration, and retrieval application functions as further described in application Ser. No. 09/610,738, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,035,880, issued Apr. 25, 2006. This client computer 85 component can function independently or together with other similar client computer 85 components.
As previously described, storage operation cells are often communicatively coupled and hierarchically organized. For example, as shown in
Thus, the master storage manager 135 communicates with the manager agent of the storage manager of the first storage operation cell 140 (or directly with the other components of the first cell 140) regarding storage operations performed in the first storage operation cell 140. For example, in some embodiments, the master storage manager 135 instructs the first storage operation cell 140 how and when to perform storage operations including the type of operation to perform and the data on which to perform the operation.
In other embodiments, the master storage manager 135 tracks the status of its associated storage operation cells, such as the status of jobs, system components, system resources, and other items, by communicating with manager agents (or other components) in the respective storage operation cells. In other embodiments, the master storage manager 135 tracks the status of its associated storage operation cells by receiving periodic status updates from the manager agents (or other components) in the respective cells regarding jobs, system components, system resources, and other items. For example, in some embodiments, the master storage manager 135 uses methods monitor network resources such as mapping network pathways and topologies to, among other things, physically monitor storage operations and suggest alternate routes for storing data as further described herein.
In some embodiments, the master storage manager 135 stores status information and other information regarding its associated storage operation cells and the system in an index cache or other data structure accessible to the master storage manager 135. In some embodiments, as further described herein, the presentation interface of the master storage manager 135 accesses this information to present users and system processes with information regarding the status of storage operations, storage operation cells, system components, and other information of the system.
Storage operation cells may thus be organized hierarchically. Thus, storage operation cells may inherit properties from their parents or be controlled by other storage operation cells in the hierarchy. Thus, in some embodiments as shown in
Storage operation cells may also be organized hierarchically according to criteria such as function, geography, architectural considerations, or other factors useful in performing storage operations. For example, in one embodiment, storage operation cells are organized according to types of storage operations: the first storage operation cell 140 is directed to performing snapshot copies of primary copy data, and the second storage operation cell 145 is directed to performing backup copies of primary copy data or other data. For example, in another embodiment, the first storage operation cell 140 represents a geographic segment of an enterprise, such as a Chicago office, and a second storage operation cell 145 represents a different geographic segment, such as a New York office. In this example, the second storage operation cell 145, the third storage operation cell 150, the fourth storage operation cell 155, the fifth storage operation cell 160, and the nth storage operation cell 165 could represent departments within the New York office. Alternatively, these storage operation cells could be further divided by function performing various types of copies for the New York office or load balancing storage operations for the New York office.
In some embodiments, hierarchical organization of storage operation cells facilitates, among other things, system security and other considerations. For example, in some embodiments, only authorized users are allowed to access or control certain storage operation cells. For example, a network administrator for an enterprise might have access to all storage operation cells including the master storage manager 135. But a network administrator for only the New York office, according to a previous example, might only satisfy access criteria to have access to the second storage operation cell 145, the third storage operation cell 150, the fourth storage operation cell 155, the fifth storage operation cell 160, and the nth storage operation cell 165 which comprise the New York office storage management system.
In some embodiments, hierarchical organization of storage operation cells facilitates storage management planning and decision-making. For example, in some embodiments, a user of the master storage manager 135 can view the status of all jobs in the associated storage operation cells of the system as well as the status of each component in every storage operation cell of the system. The user can then plan and make decisions based on this global data. For example, the user can view high-level report of summary information regarding storage operations for the entire system, such as job completion status, component availability status, resource usage status (such as network pathways, etc.), and other information. The user can also drill down through menus or use other means to obtain more detailed information regarding a particular storage operation cell or group of storage operation cells.
In other embodiments, the master storage manager 135 alerts the user when a particular resource is unavailable or congested. A storage device might be full or require additional media. Alternatively, a storage manager in a particular storage operation cell may be unavailable due to hardware failure, software problems, or other reasons. In some embodiments, the master storage manager 135 (or another storage manager within the hierarchy of storage operation cells) utilizes the global data regarding its associated storage operation cells at its disposal to suggest solutions to such problems when they occur or even before they occur. For example, the master storage manager 135 might alert the user that a storage device in a particular storage operation cell was full or otherwise congested, and then suggest, based on job and data storage information contained in its index cache, an alternate storage device.
As another example, in some embodiments the master storage manager 135 (or other network storage manager) contains programming directed to analyzing the storage patterns and resources of its associated storage operation cells and which suggests optimal or alternate methods of performing storage operations. Thus, for example, the master storage manager 135 might analyze traffic patterns to determine that snapshot data should be sent via a different network segment or to a different storage operation cell or storage device. In some embodiments, users can direct specific queries to the master storage manager 135 regarding predicting storage operations or regarding storage operation information.
Systems and modules described herein may comprise software, firmware, hardware, or any combination(s) of software, firmware, or hardware suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may reside on servers, workstations, personal computers, computerized tablets, PDAs, and other devices suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may be accessible via local memory, via a network, via a browser or other application in an ASP context, or via other means suitable for the purposes described herein. Data structures described herein may comprise computer files, variables, programming arrays, programming structures, or any electronic information storage schemes or methods, or any combinations thereof, suitable for the purposes described herein. User interface elements described herein may comprise elements from graphical user interfaces, command line interfaces, and other interfaces suitable for the purposes described herein. Screenshots presented and described herein can be displayed differently as known in the art to input, access, change, manipulate, modify, alter, and work with information.
While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many variations and modifications as will be evident to those skilled in this art may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and the invention is thus not to be limited to the precise details of methodology or construction set forth above as such variations and modification are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/820,533, filed Jun. 22, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,103,829, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/271,677, filed Nov. 14, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,757,043, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/877,831, filed Jun. 25, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,454,569, which claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/482,305, filed Jun. 25, 2003, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by referenced in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4296465 | Lemak | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4686620 | Ng | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4751639 | Corcoran et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4995035 | Cole et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5093912 | Dong et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5133065 | Cheffetz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5193154 | Kitajima et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5204958 | Cheng et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212772 | Masters | May 1993 | A |
| 5226157 | Nakano et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5239647 | Anglin et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5241668 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5241670 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5265159 | Kung | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5276860 | Fortier et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5276867 | Kenley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5287500 | Stoppani, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5301351 | Jippo | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5311509 | Heddes et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5321816 | Rogan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5333251 | Urabe et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5333315 | Saether et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5347653 | Flynn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5410700 | Fecteau et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5426284 | Doyle | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5448724 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455926 | Keele et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5491810 | Allen | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5495607 | Pisello et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5504873 | Martin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5544345 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544347 | Yanai et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555404 | Torbjornsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559957 | Balk | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559991 | Kanfi | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5574898 | Leblang et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5598546 | Blomgren | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5613134 | Lucus et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5615392 | Harrison et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5619644 | Crockett et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5638509 | Dunphy et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642496 | Kanfi | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5649185 | Antognini et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5659614 | Bailey | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5673381 | Huai et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5675511 | Prasad et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677900 | Nishida et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682513 | Candelaria et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687343 | Fecteau et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5699361 | Ding et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5719786 | Nelson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5729743 | Squibb | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734817 | Roffe et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737747 | Vishlitzky et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740405 | DeGraaf | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742807 | Masinter | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5751997 | Kullick et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758359 | Saxon | May 1998 | A |
| 5758649 | Iwashita et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761677 | Senator et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761734 | Pfeffer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5764972 | Crouse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778395 | Whiting et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790828 | Jost | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5805920 | Sprenkle et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5806058 | Mori et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812398 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812748 | Ohran et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813013 | Shakib et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5829046 | Tzelnic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835953 | Ohran | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845257 | Fu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5860073 | Ferrel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5860104 | Witt et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864871 | Kitain et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5875478 | Blumenau | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875481 | Ashton et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5884067 | Storm et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5896531 | Curtis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897642 | Capossela et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898431 | Webster et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901327 | Ofek | May 1999 | A |
| 5924102 | Perks | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926836 | Blumenau | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933104 | Kimura | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5933601 | Fanshier et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950205 | Aviani, Jr. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956519 | Wise et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956733 | Nakano et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958005 | Thorne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970233 | Liu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970255 | Tran et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974563 | Beeler, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978841 | Berger | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987478 | See et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991753 | Wilde | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995091 | Near et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6000020 | Chin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6003089 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009274 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6012090 | Chung et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012415 | Linseth | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016553 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018744 | Mamiya et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021415 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023710 | Steiner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026414 | Anglin | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026437 | Muschett et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6052735 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6070228 | Belknap et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073137 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073220 | Gunderson | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6076148 | Kedem et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078934 | Lahey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085030 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088694 | Burns et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091518 | Anabuki | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094416 | Ying | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101585 | Brown et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105037 | Kishi | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105129 | Meier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108640 | Slotznick | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108712 | Hayes, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112239 | Kenner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6122668 | Teng et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131095 | Low et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131190 | Sidwell | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137864 | Yaker | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6148377 | Carter et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148412 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154787 | Urevig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154852 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6161111 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161192 | Lubbers et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167402 | Yeager | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6175829 | Li et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6189051 | Oh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6212512 | Barney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212521 | Minami et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6230164 | Rekieta et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243755 | Takagi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249795 | Douglis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253217 | Dourish et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260069 | Anglin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263368 | Martin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269382 | Cabrera et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269431 | Dunham | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275953 | Vahalia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6292783 | Rohler | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295541 | Bodnar et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6301592 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304880 | Kishi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314439 | Bates et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314460 | Knight et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324581 | Xu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328766 | Long | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330570 | Crighton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330572 | Sitka | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330589 | Kennedy | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330642 | Carteau | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6343287 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6350199 | Williams et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351764 | Voticky et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| RE37601 | Eastridge et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
| 6353878 | Dunham | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356801 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356863 | Sayle | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360306 | Bergsten | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6367029 | Mayhead et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374336 | Peters et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389432 | Pothapragada et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396513 | Helfman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397308 | Ofek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6418478 | Ignatius et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421709 | McCormick et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421711 | Blumenau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6438595 | Blumenau et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453325 | Cabrera et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466592 | Chapman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470332 | Weschler | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6487561 | Ofek et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487644 | Huebsch et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493811 | Blades et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6519679 | Devireddy et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6535910 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538669 | Lagueux, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542909 | Tamer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6542972 | Ignatius et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6546545 | Honarvar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6549918 | Probert et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553410 | Kikinis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6557039 | Leong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6564219 | Lee et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6564228 | O'Connor | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6581143 | Gagne et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6593656 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6604149 | Deo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6615241 | Miller et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631493 | Ottesen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6647396 | Parnell et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6647409 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654825 | Clapp et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6658436 | Oshinsky et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6658526 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6704933 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721767 | De Meno et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6728733 | Tokui | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6732124 | Koseki et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742092 | Huebsch et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6757794 | Cabrera et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760723 | Oshinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6789161 | Blendermann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6871163 | Hiller et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6874023 | Pennell et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6886020 | Zahavi et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6941304 | Gainey et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952758 | Chron et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6968351 | Butterworth | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973553 | Archibald, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6978265 | Schumacher | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6983351 | Gibble et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7003519 | Biettron et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003641 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7035880 | Crescenti et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039860 | Gautestad | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7062761 | Slavin et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076685 | Pillai et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082441 | Zahavi et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7085904 | Mizuno et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096315 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103731 | Gibble et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7103740 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107298 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107395 | Ofek et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7120757 | Tsuge | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7130970 | Devassy et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7149893 | Leonard et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7155465 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155481 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155633 | Tuma et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7174312 | Harper et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7194454 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7246140 | Therrien et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246207 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7269612 | Devarakonda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272606 | Borthakur et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278142 | Bandhole et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7287047 | Kavuri | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7293133 | Colgrove et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7315923 | Retnamma et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7315924 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7328225 | Beloussov et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7343356 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7343365 | Farnham et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7343453 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7343459 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346623 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346751 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7356657 | Mikami | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7359917 | Winter et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7380072 | Kottomtharayil et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7386552 | Kitamura et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7389311 | Crescenti et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7395282 | Crescenti et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7409509 | Devassy et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7430587 | Malone et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7433301 | Akahane et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7434219 | De Meno et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7447692 | Oshinsky et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7454569 | Kavuri et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7467167 | Patterson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7472238 | Gokhale | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7484054 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7490207 | Amarendran | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496589 | Jain et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7500053 | Kavuri et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7500150 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509316 | Greenblatt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512601 | Cucerzan et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519726 | Palliyil et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523483 | Dogan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7529748 | Wen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7532340 | Koppich et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536291 | Retnamma et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7543125 | Gokhale | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546324 | Prahlad et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7581077 | Ignatius et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7596586 | Gokhale et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7613748 | Brockway et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7617253 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7617262 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7617541 | Plotkin et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7627598 | Burke | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7627617 | Kavuri et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7636743 | Erofeev | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7651593 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7661028 | Erofeev | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7668798 | Scanlon et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7685126 | Patel et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7716171 | Kryger | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7734715 | Hyakutake et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7757043 | Kavuri et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7802067 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7840537 | Gokhale et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7844676 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7870355 | Erofeev | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7873808 | Stewart | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7877351 | Crescenti et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7890719 | Gokhale | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7962455 | Erofeev | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8041673 | Crescenti et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8078583 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086809 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8103670 | Oshinsky et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103829 | Kavuri et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8214444 | Prahlad et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8266106 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266397 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20020004883 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040376 | Yamanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042869 | Tate et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049626 | Mathias et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049778 | Bell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069324 | Gerasimov et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103848 | Giacomini et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107877 | Whiting et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161753 | Inaba et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030061491 | Jaskiewicz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163399 | Harper et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172158 | Pillai et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220984 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040107199 | Dairymple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193953 | Callahan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205206 | Naik et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230829 | Dogan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050033800 | Kavuri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044114 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114406 | Borthakur et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246510 | Retnamma et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268068 | Ignatius et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005048 | Osaki et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010154 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010227 | Atluri | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20070043956 | El Far et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078913 | Crescenti et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100867 | Celik et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143756 | Gokhale | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183224 | Erofeev | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288536 | Sen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080059515 | Fulton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080229037 | Bunte et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243914 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243957 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243958 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080244177 | Crescenti et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090055407 | Oshinsky et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228894 | Gokhale | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248762 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271791 | Gokhale | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319534 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319585 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005259 | Prahlad | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049753 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094808 | Erofeev | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100529 | Erofeev | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122053 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131461 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138393 | Crescenti et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145909 | Ngo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179941 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205150 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110066817 | Kavuri et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110072097 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119235 | Crescenti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120030177 | Crescenti et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059797 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089800 | Prahlad et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124042 | Oshinsky et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0259912 | Mar 1988 | EP |
| 0341230 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0381651 | Aug 1990 | EP |
| 0405926 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0467546 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 599 466 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0670543 | Sep 1995 | EP |
| 0717346 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0774715 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0809184 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 0862304 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 0899662 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0981090 | Feb 2000 | EP |
| 0 986 011 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 0 986 011 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1174795 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| H11-102314 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| H11-259459 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 2001-60175 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| WO 9417474 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| WO 9513580 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO 9839707 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 9912098 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9914692 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9923585 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 0104756 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 2005050381 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Armstead et al., “Implementation of a Campus-wide Distributed Mass Storage Service: The Dream vs. Reality,” IEEE, 1995, pp. 190-199. |
| Arneson, “Development of Omniserver; Mass Storage Systems,” Control Data Corporation, 1990, pp. 88-93. |
| Arneson, “Mass Storage Archiving in Network Environments” IEEE, 1998, pp. 45-50. |
| Ashton, et al., “Two Decades of policy-based storage management for the IBM mainframe computer”, www.research.ibm.com, 19 pages, published Apr. 10, 2003, printed Jan. 3, 2009—cited in U.S. Appl. No. 12/276,868., www.research.ibm.com, Apr. 10, 2003, pp. 19. |
| Cabrera et al., “ADSM: A Multi-Platform, Scalable, Backup and Archive Mass Storage System,” Digest of Papers, Compcon '95, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Computer Society International Conference, Mar. 5, 1995-Mar. 9, 1995, pp. 420-427, San Francisco, CA. |
| Catapult, Inc., Microsoft Outlook 2000 Step by Step, Published May 7, 1999, “Collaborating with Others Using Outlook & Exchange”, p. 8 including “Message Timeline.” |
| Eitel, “Backup and Storage Management in Distributed Heterogeneous Environments,” IEEE, 1994, pp. 124-126. |
| European Communication in Application No. 01906806.3, issued Sep. 21, 2010, in 6 pages. |
| Gait, “The Optical File Cabinet: A Random-Access File system for Write-Once Optical Disks,” IEEE Computer, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 11-22 (1988) (see in particular figure 5 in p. 15 and the recitation in claim 5). |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive—Bayes—classifier. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 15, 2006 in PCT/US2004/038278 filed Nov. 15, 2004, (Publication No. WO2005/050381). |
| International Search Report dated Feb. 1, 2006 in PCT/US2004/038278 filed Nov. 15, 2004, (Publication No. WO2005/050381). |
| International Search Report on Patentability dated Dec. 21, 2000 in PCT/US00/19364 filed Nov. 14, 2000 (Publication No. WO01/04756). |
| International Search Report, PCT Application PCT/US02/17973, Aug. 22, 2002; 1 page. |
| Jander, “Launching Storage-Area Net,” Data Communications, US, McGraw Hill, NY, vol. 27, No. 4(Mar. 21, 1998), pp. 64-72. |
| Microsoft, about using Microsoft Excel 2000 files with earlier version Excel, 1985-1999, Microsoft, p. 1. |
| Rosenblum et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structure File System,” Operating Systems Review SIGOPS, vol. 25, No. 5, New York, US, pp. 1-15 (May 1991). |
| Supplementary European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 02747883, Sep. 15, 2006; 2 pages. |
| Szor, The Art of Virus Research and Defense, Symantec Press (2005) ISBN 0-321-30454-3. |
| Weatherspoon H. et al., “Silverback: A Global-Scale Archival System,” Mar. 2001, pp. 1-15. |
| Communication in European Application No. 02 747 883.3, mailed Jul. 20, 2007). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/609,977, filed Jul. 5, 2000, Crescenti et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,473, filed May 31, 2012, Prahlad, Anand et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/606,584, filed Sep. 7, 2012, Prahlad et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/607,561, filed Sep. 7, 2012, Prahlad et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,010, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Crescenti et al. |
| Szor, The Art of Virus Research and Defense, Symantec Press (2005) ISBN 0-321-30454-3, Part 1. |
| Szor, The Art of Virus Research and Defense, Symantec Press (2005) ISBN 0-321-30454-3, Part 2. |
| Witten et al., Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Ian H. Witten & Eibe Frank, Elsevier (2005) ISBN 0-12-088407-0, Part 1. |
| Witten et al., Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Ian H. Witten & Eibe Frank, Elsevier (2005) ISBN 0-12-088407-0, Part 2. |
| International Search Report dated Aug. 22, 2002, PCT/US2002/017973. |
| International Search Report, PCT/US02/17973, Aug. 22, 2002, 1 page. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 23, 2003, PCT/US2001/003088. |
| European Examination Report, Application No. 01906806.3-1244, dated Sep. 13, 2006, 3 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2008, Application No. 2003/502696. |
| International Search Report and Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 21, 2002, PCT/US2001/003183. |
| European Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2008, EP019068337. |
| International Search Report, and Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 29, 2001, PCT/US2001/003209. |
| International Search Report and Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 3, 2003, PCT/US2002/018169. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Sep. 21, 2006, EP02778952.8. |
| Translation of Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2008, Application No. 2003-504235. |
| European Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2008, EP02778952.8. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2004/038278, May 15, 2006. |
| International Search Report, PCT/US2004/03827, Feb. 1, 2006. |
| International Search Report and Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 4, 2001, PCT/US2000/019363. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2000, PCT/US2000/019324. |
| International Search Report, PCT/US2000/019364, dated Dec. 21, 2000. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2000, PCT/US2000/019329. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120124289 A1 | May 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60482305 | Jun 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12820533 | Jun 2010 | US |
| Child | 13356471 | US | |
| Parent | 12271677 | Nov 2008 | US |
| Child | 12820533 | US | |
| Parent | 10877831 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Child | 12271677 | US |
