The present invention relates to fabrication of magnetic heads, and more particularly, this invention relates to defining a tape bearing surface on a magnetic tape head.
Many modern electronic components are created by thin film wafer processing. One category of component created by thin film processing is the tape head. Another category is the disk head.
Most tape heads are currently built on wafers using thin film processes, similar to the wafers used for fabricating disk heads. However, the operating efficiency of disk heads and tape heads are inherently different. Disk recording/reading is very efficient, as the disk media is extremely flat and smooth, has a very thin magnetic layer, is in a sealed environment, and the heads are constructed to function with a particular media. Writing and reading tapes must address very different challenges. For example, the head should work with different tape brands, which can have different physical and magnetic properties. Furthermore, most tape is composed of magnetic particles, which are coated onto the tape surface. The resulting media can have variations in coating thickness and particle dispersion. This, coupled with spacing loss variations due to embedded wear particles and debris, requires that magnetic bits in tape be much larger than bits in disk media for achieving an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio.
Disk drive heads are designed to fly over smooth disk surfaces in a controlled manner at speeds exceeding 30 to 40 meters per second. By contrast, tape stacking and other requirements limit tape drive operating speeds to approximately 5 to 10 meters per second. Thus, to achieve data rates commensurate with disk drives, high performance linear tape drives typically employ heads having multiple transducers that operate simultaneously. For example, two transducers provide twice the data rate of one transducer, and modern heads have 32 transducers for each direction.
An important and continuing goal in the data storage industry is that of increasing the density of data stored on a medium. For tape storage systems, that goal has led to increasing the track and linear bit density on recording tape, and decreasing the thickness of the magnetic tape medium. However, the development of small footprint, higher performance tape drive systems has created various problems in the design of a tape head assembly for use in such systems.
For example, tolerances decrease as feature size decreases. Moreover, smaller components tend to be more fragile than their larger predecessors.
A method according to one embodiment includes forming a slot on a tape bearing surface of at least a chip having a thin film layer with a plurality of transducers therein, the slot defining a skiving edge. A second operation is performed on the tape bearing surface of at least the chip for removing a portion of the chip positioned on an opposite side of the slot as the transducers.
A method according to another embodiment includes coupling closures to a section of a thin film wafer having a plurality of rows of transducers formed on a substrate, the closures being coupled to the section on an opposite side of the transducers as the substrate. An end of the section is lapped for polishing the end of the section and the closure. A row is sliced from the section, the row having the polished end. A slot is formed in the polished end. A tape bearing surface is defined between the slot and portions of the transducers visibly exposed on the polished end. A portion of the polished end located on an opposite side of the slot as the transducers is removed from the row or segment thereof.
Any of these embodiments may be implemented to fabricate a magnetic head usable with a magnetic data storage system such as a tape drive system, which may include the magnetic head, a drive mechanism for passing a magnetic medium (e.g., recording tape) over the magnetic head, and a controller electrically coupled to the magnetic head.
Other aspects and embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, when taken in conjunction with the drawings, illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
The following description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the present invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein. Further, particular features described herein can be used in combination with other described features in each of the various possible combinations and permutations.
Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be given their broadest possible interpretation including meanings implied from the specification as well as meanings understood by those skilled in the art and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc.
It must also be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless otherwise specified.
The following description discloses several embodiments for producing tape heads having a precisely-positioned tape bearing surface edge.
In one general embodiment, a method includes forming a slot on a tape bearing surface of at least a chip having a thin film layer with a plurality of transducers therein, the slot defining a skiving edge. A second operation is performed on the tape bearing surface of at least the chip for removing a portion of the chip positioned on an opposite side of the slot as the transducers.
In another general embodiment, a method includes coupling closures to a section of a thin film wafer having a plurality of rows of transducers formed on a substrate, the closures being coupled to the section on an opposite side of the transducers as the substrate. An end of the section is lapped for polishing the end of the section and the closure. A row is sliced from the section, the row having the polished end. Optical detection of a reflective feature on the polished end is used to determine a location for a slot, which is then formed in the polished end at the determined location. A tape bearing surface is defined between the slot and portions of the transducers visibly exposed on the polished end. A portion of the polished end located on an opposite side of the slot as the transducers is removed from the row or segment thereof,
In yet another general embodiment, an apparatus includes a substrate, a thin film layer on the substrate having transducers therein, and a portion of a slot extending along the substrate, the portion of the slot defining a skiving edge. A length of a tape bearing surface between the substrate and the skiving edge is in a range of about 7 to about 30 microns.
One category of component created by thin film processing is the tape head.
According to the preferred method for forming the head, a wafer containing multiple “chips” each having read and/or write circuitry is formed by traditional thin film processing. The thin film wafer is cut into rectangular sections, sometimes called quads.
Referring to
Referring to
If the row includes multiple head images, the row may be cut into chips. Preferably, the rows are cut into individual thin film elements, or chips 1200, using conventional methods. See
Each chip 1200 may be coupled to a beam such as a U-beam 1300, as shown in
Additional processes may be performed, before or after the chip 1200 is coupled to a beam. For example, the row or chip may be lapped again, using conventional techniques such as KISS lapping on a charged plate. Milling may be performed, e.g., for preparing the polished surface for application of a protective overcoat thereto. A conventional protective overcoat may be applied to the polished end.
A grinding process is performed in at least two steps. The first grinding operation is very shallow, and creates a slot 1404 that defines a tape bearing surface 1402 between an edge of the slot 1404 and the thin film layer 204. Where a portion of the circuitry of the thin film layer 204, exposed on the polished end, is used as the optical landmark for the slot positioning, the length of the tape bearing surface 1402 between the slot 1404 and that portion of the circuitry may be very accurately defined.
Any conventional mechanism for forming the slot may be used. In a preferred embodiment, a conventional grinding wheel in a system with machine vision may be used to create the slot at the proper location.
Being shallow and with the grinding wheel captive on both edges, the first grinding operation is precise and does not generate a significant cusp, where a cusp is a lip on the ground edge produced by compressive stresses during grinding. The cusp should be avoided as it tends to create non-uniform air leakage into the head-tape interface, resulting in unacceptable increase in spacing.
Subsequently, a portion of the chip 1200 located on an opposite side of the slot 1404 as the circuitry in the thin film layer 204 is removed using a conventional technique such as grinding.
Referring to
Two or more beams 1300 may eventually be coupled together to form a head.
Preferably, the closures are angled upwardly into the tape bearing surface (i.e., as they approach each other, preferably at an angle between 0.1 to 2 degrees, with respect to the horizontal line between them. The angle of the closures may be used to create an air skiving effect for close head-tape spacing and/or to create a tenting effect.
Preferably, the wrap angle between the two modules creates the desired tenting over the read transducers.
As shown in
According to various embodiments, the processes described herein may be used to form a partial span flat or contoured head “chip,” the chip being embeddable in a flat or contoured beam, such that the chip closure extends beyond the beam edges. For example, the rows may be cut into individual partial span heads, or chips 1600, using traditional methods. See
Similar processes as those described above with reference to
With continued reference to
As shown in
The tape bearing surfaces (of the chip and U-beam) should be as parallel and coplanar as possible because the tape will run across them. However, the tape bearing surfaces do not need to be perfectly coplanar, as this design provides some tolerance for misalignment. Thus, the chip surface envelope may deviate from the tape bearing surface of the U-beam by several micrometers. This tolerance relief greatly reduces fabrication costs.
As shown in
Referring to
Two beams 1700 can be coupled together to form a head with spacing between the central portions of the beams, such as a head of the type shown in
Preferably, the closures are angled upwardly into the tape bearing surface (i.e., as they approach each other, preferably at an angle between 0.1 to 2 degrees, with respect to the horizontal line between them. The angle of the closures may be used to create an air skiving effect for close head-tape spacing and/or to create a tenting effect.
Preferably, the wrap angle between the two modules creates the desired tenting over the read transducers.
All of the read and/or write elements in the head are preferably positioned in the chips. Note that each chip can have multiple read and write elements, such as interleaved read/write elements. Alternatively, one chip can have all write elements and the other chip can have all read elements. Other combinations are also possible. In this way, a read/write head can be formed.
The heads created by the processes described herein can be used in magnetic recording heads for any type of magnetic media, including but not limited to disk media, magnetic tape, etc.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. For example, the structures and methodologies presented herein are generic in their application to all types of thin film devices. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4624048 | Hinkel et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
5124866 | Rothermel | Jun 1992 | A |
5718035 | Yamanaka et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5774306 | Wang | Jun 1998 | A |
6081991 | Tsunoda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
7082013 | Deshpande | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7167339 | Biskeborn | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7248438 | Biskeborn et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7274536 | Deshpande | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7382581 | Biskeborn | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7492552 | Deshpande | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7660072 | Biskeborn | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8351162 | Etoh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8675310 | Biskeborn et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8917476 | Holmberg et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9638614 | Biskeborn | May 2017 | B2 |
9704514 | Biskeborn | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9711170 | Biskeborn | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9779766 | Biskeborn | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9799355 | Biskeborn | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9837104 | Biskeborn | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9928855 | Biskeborn | Mar 2018 | B1 |
20020094758 | Reiley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030076631 | Torline et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040223261 | Deshpande et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050122631 | Biskeborn et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128638 | Koeppe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128640 | Biskeborn et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050168874 | Biskeborn et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060292968 | Fujii | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070047141 | Biskeborn et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062028 | Biskeborn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080049358 | Biskeborn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090059421 | Biskeborn et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090201613 | Biskeborn et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100134929 | Ito | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120300338 | Biskeborn | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140087089 | Biskeborn et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20160232936 | Poorman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180102138 | Biskeborn | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180108371 | Biskeborn et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H11214588 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2006054044 | Feb 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,002, filed Oct. 7, 2016. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,030, filed Oct. 7, 2016. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,002, filed Oct. 18, 2016. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, filed Oct. 24, 2016. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,651, filed Dec. 5, 2016. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,030, dated Dec. 6, 2016. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,002, dated Dec. 7, 2016. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,002, dated Dec. 7, 2016. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, dated Jan. 5, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,002, dated Feb. 27, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,002, dated Mar. 2, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,030, dated Mar. 10, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,030, dated Mar. 27, 2017. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,002, dated Apr. 5, 2017. |
Ex Parte Quayle from U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, Mar. 30, 2017. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, filed Apr. 14, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,002, dated May 9, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,030, dated May 9, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, dated May 24, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,030, dated Jun. 5, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, dated Jun. 7, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,002, dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,002, dated Jun. 16, 2017. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, dated Jul. 19, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, dated Jul. 25, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,002, dated Aug. 1, 2017. |
List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated As Related. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/333,034, dated Aug. 25, 2017. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/297,002, dated Aug. 31, 2017. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/685,903, filed Aug. 24, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, dated Sep. 14, 2017. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, dated Jan. 17, 2018. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, dated May 11, 2018. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, dated Apr. 12, 2018. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/685,903, dated Apr. 9, 2018. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/685,903, dated Sep. 14, 2018. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,272, dated Oct. 10, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180108372 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15297002 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 15685930 | US |