The disclosure generally relates to constant velocity joints and more particularly, to high angle, high-speed plunging constant velocity joints.
Constant velocity joints (CV joints) are common components in all types of automotive vehicles. Constant velocity joints are typically used where transmission of constant velocity rotary motion is desired or required. In other words, constant velocity joints operate to transmit torque between two rotational members. The rotational members are typically interconnected by a cage or yoke that allow the rotational members to operate with their respective axes at a relative angle.
Common types of constant velocity joints include but are not limited to, plunging tripod, fixed tripod, plunging ball joint, and fixed ball joint. These joints can be used in a variety of different configurations including four wheel drive vehicles, all wheel drive vehicles, front wheel drive vehicles or rear wheel drive vehicles. Constant velocity joints are commonly classified by their operating characteristics. One important operating characteristic relates to the relative angular velocities of the two shafts connected thereby. In a constant velocity joint, the instantaneous angular velocities of the two shafts are always equal, regardless of the relative angular orientation between the two shafts. In a non-constant velocity joint the instantaneous angular velocities of the two shafts vary with the angular orientation (although the average angular velocities for a complete rotation are equal). Another important operating characteristic is the ability of the joint to allow relative axial movement between the two shafts. A fixed joint does not allow this relative movement, while a plunge joint does.
The plunging constant velocity joints allow axial movement during the operation of the constant velocity joint without the use of slip splines. However, plunging constant velocity joints sometimes initiate forces inherent of the particular constant velocity joint by function of design that result in vibration and noises through the driveline. The plunging types allow angular displacement along with the axial displacement along two axes thereof. In contrast, the fixed type constant velocity joints generally only allow angular displacement between two axes. The fixed constant velocity joints are better situated for higher operating angles than that of a plunging type constant velocity joint. All of these constant velocity joints are generally grease lubricated for life and sealed by a sealing boot when used on drive shafts. Thus, the constant velocity joints are sealed in order to retain grease inside the joint while keeping contaminates and foreign matter, such as dirt and water, out of the joint. The sealing protection of the constant velocity joint is necessary because contamination of the inner chamber causes internal damage and destruction of the joint which increases heat and wear on the boot, thus inevitably leading to premature boot and grease failures and hence failure of the overall joint. The problem of higher temperatures in high speed fixed constant velocity joint is greatly enhanced at the higher angles due to the rotational motion allowed by increased friction from the additional motion of plunging along the axis. Thus, the increased temperatures because of higher angles along with increased stresses on the boot because of higher angles may result in premature failures of the prior art constant velocity joints.
In a typical prior art constant velocity joint, a bulky and heavy outer race was used, having a spherical inner surface and a plurality of grooves on a surface therein. The joints also include an inner race, having a spherical outer surface with guide grooves formed therein. The prior art constant velocity joints used six torque transmitting balls, which are arranged between the guide grooves and the outer and inner race surfaces of the constant velocity joint by a cage retainer. The balls allow a predetermined displacement angle to occur through the joint thus, transmitting a constant velocity through the shafts of the automotive drive train system. The standard fixed high angle and high-speed constant velocity joints have no operational axial clearance between the inner race and the cage.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for a constant velocity joint that is capable of plunging during high angle and high-speed use while eliminating forces that result in vibration and noises through the driveline that are present in prior art plunging type constant velocity joints. There is also a need in the art for a plunging constant velocity joint that has a smaller package, increased efficiency and better thermal characteristics during high-speed, high angle operation.
Referring now to the drawings, illustrative embodiments are shown in detail. Although the drawings represent some embodiments, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be exaggerated, removed, or partially sectioned to better illustrate and explain the present invention. Further, the embodiments set forth herein are exemplary and are not intended to be exhaustive or otherwise limit or restrict the claims to the precise form and configurations shown in the drawings and disclosed in the following detailed description.
Referring to the drawings, an exemplary arrangement of a plunging constant velocity joint 30 is shown. The plunging constant velocity joint 30 is generally configured as a high angle, high speed, ball type plunging constant velocity joint for use on propeller shafts, drive shafts or connected directly to a drive unit. The high angle can be defined as anything greater than or equal to nine degrees. These high angle joints tend to operate at high speeds and at higher temperatures than other joints.
A typical driveline for an all wheel drive vehicle includes a plurality of constant velocity joints with at least one being a plunging constant velocity joint 30. However, it should be noted that the constant velocity joint disclosed herein can also be used in rear wheel drive only vehicles, front wheel drive only vehicles, and four wheel drive vehicles. Generally, a driveline includes an engine that is connected to a transmission and a power take-off unit or transfer case. A front differential may have a right hand side shaft and a left hand side shaft each of which are connected to a wheel and deliver power to the wheels. On both ends of the right hand front side shaft and left hand front side shaft are constant velocity joints with at least one end being a plunging constant velocity joint. A propeller shaft connects the front differential and the rear differential to the transfer case or power take-off unit. The rear differential may include a right hand rear side shaft and a left hand rear side shaft each of which ends with a wheel on an end thereof. Generally, a constant velocity joint is located on both ends of the half shaft that connect to the wheel and the rear differential with at least one end being a plunging constant velocity joint 30. The propeller shaft generally may be a multi-piece propeller shaft that includes a plurality of carden joints and/or high speed plunging constant velocity joints 30. The plunging constant velocity joints 30 transmit power to the wheels through the drive shaft even if the wheels or the shaft have changing angles due to steering, raising or lowering of the suspension of the vehicle, etc. The plunging constant velocity joints 30 allow for transmission of constant velocities at a variety of angles which are found in everyday driving of automotive vehicles on both the half shafts and prop shafts of these vehicles. The plunging or axial movement feature enables the shaft to slide in or out creating a reduction in torque loads applied to the shaft or drive unit during various stop and go operations of the drive unit.
As seen in
It should be noted that the plunging constant velocity joint 30 outer race 32 is thinner than the outer races of prior art plunging constant velocity joints. This will help reduce the weight of the outer race 32 while also reducing the package size of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. In one embodiment the outer race 32 is approximately 24 mm but may be any width less than 150 mm for a disc style joint. For a cupped or monoblock style joint, the outer race 32 may have a width greater than 150 mm, depending on the design requirements for the automotive vehicle. The use of the axially opposed tracks 38 allows a concavo-convex roller cage 54 to be centered between the outer race 32 and the inner race 46 while maintaining a predetermined distance from the edge surfaces of the outer race 32. This insures that the plunging constant velocity joint 30 is symmetrical in nature and the predetermined distance provides clearance allowing the concavo-convex roller cage 54 to move freely when the balls 44 roll within the constant velocity joint 30.
As discussed above, in the exemplary arrangement shown in the FIGS., the ball tracks 38 on the inner surface of the outer race 32 are double offset tracks. The double offset tracks 38 incorporate both a radial offset 43 in addition to an axial offset 41 (see, e.g.,
However, it should be noted that it is contemplated to make a joint with varying ball configurations while incorporating all of the features of the plunging constant velocity joint 30 disclosed herein. Additionally, the arrangement of the balls 44 within the concavo-convex roller cage 54 and contacting the double offset tracks 38 provides a low plunging force as the concavo-convex roller cage 54 may move half of the amount of travel, which allows the balls 44 to roll where previous designs resulted in the balls 44 potentially skidding in the tracks. Thus, the rolling action of the balls 44 may reduce friction, heat and vibration that may be inherent depending on the constant velocity joint.
The plunging constant velocity joint 30 also includes an inner race 46 generally having a circumferential shape, best seen in
The plunging constant velocity joint 30 concavo-convex roller cage 54 (see
The plunging action is best defined by a series of ratios calculated to optimize plunge. Plunge is further defined by axial transmission of torque and can be achieved with the following ratios.
1. Plunge÷Inner race axial radius offset=6/3=2 (max);
2. Plunge÷Cage/Inner race axial clearance=6/3=2 (max);
3. Plunge÷steering angle=0.5÷1.3;
4. Plunge÷Δ PCD/Δ window=3.75÷15;
5. Plunge÷axial track offset=6/17=0.353;
6. Plunge÷radial track offset=6/7=0.857;
7. Plunge÷Cage Inner Radius−Outer Radius of inner race=6/1=6;
8. A PCD÷Δ window=0.4÷1.6.
It is noted that these ratios do not necessarily need to be present. However they are beneficial when optimizing the desired plunge in a plunging constant velocity joint 30.
The concavo-convex roller cage 54 is arranged within the circumferential shaped bore 34 of the outer race 32 such that it is not in contact with the inner surface of the outer race 32. The concavo-convex roller cage 54 has a plurality of oblong shaped orifices 56 through a surface thereof. The number of orifices 56 will match the number of ball tracks 38, 40 on the outer race 32 and inner race 46 of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. In one exemplary embodiment, such as that shown in the drawings, there will be eight orifices 56 therethrough. The concavo-convex roller cage 54 is centered and supported solely by the outer spherical surface of the inner race 46. This will allow for an efficiency improvement of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. With no contact between the outer race 32 inner surface and the outer surface of the concavo-convex roller cage 54, efficiency is improved, thereby reducing the likelihood of boot and grease thermal failures. The concavo-convex roller cage 54 is also designed such that it does not have typical cage grooves that would weaken the concavo-convex roller cage 54. This allows the inner race 46 to be assembled within the concavo-convex roller cage 54 without the use of the specialized cage grooves but through the use of recessed areas 53 as discussed above. The concavo-convex roller cage 54 along with the inner race 46 are preferably made of a steel material but any other hard metal material, plastic, composite or ceramic, etc. may also be used. The concavo-convex roller cage 54 in the present invention is nearly in equilibrium and therefore most of the contact loads cancel each other out. This will also help increase the efficiency of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. The plunging motion or axial movement allows the concavo-convex roller cage 54 to eliminate a greater amount of contact loads.
The plunging constant velocity joint 30 includes a plurality of balls 44. The balls 44 generally have a larger diameter, which is permitted since the assembly angle is smaller for the plunging constant velocity joint 30, than for most of the current art. The use of the larger diameter balls 44 also reduces the stress on the inner race 46. The larger diameter balls 44 are each arranged within one each of the orifices 56 of the concavo-con vex roller cage 54 and within a ball track 38, 40 of the outer race 32 and of the inner race 46. Therefore, the balls 44 will be capable of rolling in the axially opposed tracks 38, 40 aligned in the same direction. The use of the double offset means that the radial path of the balls travel is shallower thus allowing for a higher angle in a smaller, lighter plunging constant velocity joint 30.
The plunging constant velocity joint 30 may use an integrated closed end (not shown) for direct attachment to a propshaft or drive unit. The plunging constant velocity joint 30 may also use a grease cap 58 on one end (shown in
On an end opposite of the grease cap 58 of the outer race 32 is located a boot cover 60 (best seen in
A pliable boot 64 is secured between the boot cover 60 and the shaft 66 of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. Any known securing method can be used to hold the boot 64 around the shaft 66 such as a boot clamp, fastener, etc. The pliable boot 64 is generally made of a urethane material but any other pliable material such as fabric, plastic, or rubber may also be used for the constant velocity joint boot 64 as long as it is capable of withstanding the high temperature and high rotational speeds of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. It should be noted that the boot 64 is arranged such that the boot 64 is set within the outer circumference of the concavo-convex roller cage 54. This will allow the boot 64 to move closer to the center line of the plunging constant velocity joint 30 thus decreasing the package size and reducing the stress on the boot 64 and hence reducing the likelihood of boot failure and constant velocity joint failure.
In one exemplary arrangement, the stub shaft 66 is a separate shaft, that is fixed, via the splines 42, to the inner race 46 of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. The stub shaft 66 generally is solid. The stub shaft 66 and propshaft tube will pass through the inner circumferential shaped bore 34 of the outer race 32 during the event of a collision, thus reducing the forces in the collision and absorbing energy as it collapses. It should be noted that the pitch circle diameter PCD and the size of the balls 44 are predetermined in such a way to allow a balance to occur such that the inner race 46 and balls 44 will be allowed to plunge from the outer race 32 during a crash incident, thus allowing the shaft and tube like members to collapse therein. The shaft 66 may also be an integrated hollow extension of the inner race 46 having internal splines 42 for receiving a shaft in a drive unit.
The axially opposed ball tracks 38 and 40 aligned on the outer race and inner race 46 in construction with the double offsets, the removal of the outer race spherical contact surfaces, and the judicious choice of the (PCD) and ball size permit a large improvement in efficiency while also improving durability. Predetermined ratios are contemplated with the plunging constant velocity joint 30 as described above. A ratio C1 which is the ball diameter divided by the pitch circle diameter should be greater than or equal to 0.217 but less than or equal to 0.275 in an eight ball unit as shown here. However, in a three or plus three joint, the C1 ratio could be greater than or equal to 0.217 and less than or equal to 0.318. It should be noted that if the C1 ratio is too large there will be a reduction in the concavo-convex roller cage 54 and inner race 46 strength as well as a loss of efficiency due to increased ball 44 sliding during the constant velocity joint 30 movement. However, if the ratio C1 is too small problems associated with assembling the inner race 46 into the concavo-convex roller cage 54 will occur. Furthermore, there will also be durability problems due to a lack of track edge support and reduced ball diameter. The lower ratio promotes ball rolling and thus increases efficiency of the plunging constant velocity joint 30.
A ratio X1 is defined as the axial offset divided by the pitch circle diameter and should be within the range of greater than or equal to 0.06753 while being less than or equal to 0.135. If the X1 ratio is too big the plunging constant velocity joint 30 will lose efficiency due to higher ball and cage forces. The larger variation of the ball path may also force an increase in the outside diameter of the outer race 32 to maintain adequate strength of the constant velocity joint 30. The larger ratio may also reduce track edge support at larger articulation angles as found in many current SUV vehicles. However, if the X1 ratio is too small there will be inadequate steering forces thus inhibiting the correct operation of the constant velocity joint 30. Additionally, a small X1 ratio tends to flatten the track and promotes better rolling behavior thus improving the efficiency of the plunging constant velocity joint 30.
Yet another ratio Y1 which is defined as the radial offset divided by the pitch circle diameter should be greater than or equal to 0.188. If this Y1 ratio is too small a larger variation of the ball path may force an increase in the outside diameter of the outer race 32 to maintain adequate strength of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. A small Y1 ratio may also reduce track edge support at larger articulation angles thus reducing the durability of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. A larger Y1 ratio flattens the track and improves efficiency by promoting better rolling behavior of the balls 44.
Therefore, the present disclosure of a high angle, high speed plunging constant velocity joint 30 uses a combination of innovations to create a smaller, more reliable and more efficient joint. The plunging constant velocity joint 30 has smaller part package given set capacity, while also reducing the weight of the plunging constant velocity joint 30. The plunging constant velocity joint 30 is designed to be at least twice as efficient as the standard high angle joint and will be more reliable thus increasing satisfaction of automotive manufacturers while reducing the number of joint failures and warranty issues thereafter. It should also be noted that various parameters such as the radial offset, the axial offset and the pit circle diameter may be adjusted to achieve specifically tuned objectives for the plunging constant velocity joint 30 such as but not limited to the amount of articulation angle needed or required for the constant velocity joint 30 in the drive train system. The use of the smaller diameter and reduced width outer race 32 will also reduce the cost and complexity of assembling the plunging constant velocity joint 30 for the automotive manufacturers thus reducing overall costs of the automotive vehicle. Hence, the high angle, i.e., greater than or equal to nine degree, high speed plunging constant velocity joint 30, has a better efficiency and more reliability than prior art high speed constant velocity joints that run at high temperatures thus causing premature boot and grease failures. The problem of the temperature based boot failures increases at the higher angles hence the current design limitations of the prior art constant velocity joint, need to be corrected to increase joint reliability and satisfaction. The higher temperatures and speed will produce higher stresses on the boot and contribute to many early failures of the plunging constant velocity joint. Therefore, the present disclosure of the high speed, high angle plunging constant velocity joint 30 overcomes known prior art problems by eliminating the spherical cage support surface on the outer race 32 in combination with a plurality of axially opposed tracks 38, 40, each of the tracks 38, 40 having a double offset therein. This will allow for high angles and while also promoting better efficiency and durability of the plunging constant velocity joint 30 via better ball rolling within the joint environment.
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe exemplary embodiments of the methods and systems of the present invention. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to any precise form disclosed. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. The invention may be practiced otherwise than is specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope. The scope of the invention is limited solely by the following claims.