The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/227,573 filed on Jul. 22, 2009, for “High Attrition, Rapid Dispersal×8 (H.A.R.D. 8) Extreme Rate of Fire Weapon System.”
This invention relates generally to Gatling machine guns, and more particularly to improvements therein that serve to significantly improve their operational reliability.
This improved automatic weapon system results from redesign and reduced component structure of weapons based upon the basic Gatling type design as described in the U.S. Pat. No. 502,185 to R. J. Gatling, and U.S. Pat. No. 2,849,921 to H. M. Otto, and reduced electrical power requirements as an improvement to drive motor requirement systems as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,143,922 to S. Altschuler, et al.
In the traditional Gatling type design, each ammunition round (i.e., cartridge) must be fed into a receiver in one direction, then its direction of movement must be changed by ninety degrees to insert the ammunition round into a conventional breech for firing. Then, after the round is fired, the direction of movement of the spent cartridge casing must again be changed one hundred and eighty degrees to be extracted from the breech. After these changes in movement, each cartridge casing's direction of movement must be changed again by ninety degrees to extract the casing from the weapon. All of these changes in the direction of movement of the ammunition round require great amounts of energy and are prone to malfunction.
Accordingly, a weapon system that does not require the traditional changes in directional movement of ammunition, that eliminates the complex sub-assemblies necessary to change the directional movement of ammunition, and that continues to operate when an ammunition defect fails to produce producer gases, that reduces maintenance of the system, is radically different from existing technology.
This extreme rate of fire automatic weapon system is based on simplified Gatling revolving barrel firearm principles, where the barrel rack and the eight barrel assembly revolve around a central axis point and a sealed chamber forms around an ammunition round when two intermeshing, counter rotating cylinders mesh and an ammunition belt is drawn into the process. The weapon system is premised upon ammunition moving in a single constant direction which eliminates the traditional requirement of ammunition moving in multiple directions for breech loading and extracting functions using extract mechanisms or producer gases for basic operation. Additionally, because this weapon system does not require the traditional changes in directional movement of ammunition, none of the mechanisms required for the multiple directional changes in movement of ammunition are required. Obviously, without the presence of these mechanisms, none of these mechanisms can malfunction. The resulting weapon is lighter, faster, consumes less energy, and is much more reliable.
Further, the incorporation of the breech portion of the barrel into the ammunition belt provides additional security features in the event that the weapon system falls into unauthorized control because standard belted NATO rounds cannot be fired from this design without the incorporation of a sealed breech component.
The invention described herein relates to a specialized weapon system utilizing basic physical principles to optimize and simplify the Gatling design of multiple barreled rotating machine guns which feed and actuate (i.e., fire) specified ammunition. In particular, the new weapon system eliminates reliance on mechanical feeders, de-linkers, bolts and ejectors for continuous dispersal of projectiles by means of supplying an ammunition belt to the intermeshing, counter rotating cylinder portion of the weapon and removing the complex sub-assemblies traditionally employed for round preparation, breech feeding and spent case extraction.
The primary object of the invention is to eliminate the necessity of and reliance on, intricate, delicate and numerous sub-assemblies traditionally required to achieve the primary objective of rapid firing of multiple barrel machine gun assemblies. The weapon system does not chamber ammunition rounds in the traditional sense, and, thus, the new design increases efficiency and speed of operation by eliminating the necessity of changing the momentum, movement and direction of the ammunition during the mechanical firing process. By basing the operation of the machine gun around this guiding principle, the weapon system eliminates the requirement of additional sub-assemblies to mechanically move ammunition via a bolt system into the traditional breech and the subsequent reverse action to extract the round from the breech, and thus, the design increases efficiency and reliability and decreases required mechanical movement and the energy necessary for that movement and further decreases mechanical processes and energy requirements that could cause potential failure.
Further, the design eliminates the need to de-link every ammunition round (i.e., cartridge) before it enters the chamber. The design allows the ammunition links to be fed directly through the cylinder assemblies, fired, and ejected out the other side. This eliminates the need for additional complex sub-assemblies to de-link the cartridges, and reduces heat buildup. Accordingly, ammunition “cook offs” will be virtually eliminated due to the reduction in heat.
A further object of the invention is to eliminate the need for breech loading and extraction mechanisms or successful explosion of ammunition to function. This weapon system eliminates the traditional breech loading function. This system also eliminates current technology reliance on extraction mechanisms or successful explosion of ammunition and the resulting production of producer gases to operate. These features allow the new system to continue to operate based on mechanical drive principles and will not cease to function if defects in ammunition cause a failure in the production of producer gases. Similarly, because there is no traditional breech loading and extraction, there can be no malfunction in these areas.
A further object of the invention is to reduce maintenance requirements. By a general fifty percent reduction in required moving parts over conventional bolt reliant weapons to operate, and the elimination of the necessity of production of producer gasses to function, this weapon system is far less complex and significantly more reliable than the traditional design.
A further object of the invention is to eliminate the necessity of a host vehicle power source for operation. The weapon system is designed to function independently from a host vehicle power source using its own internal battery power and to be able to interact with a host vehicle power source for operation. The system reduces mechanical parts requiring force for movement to reduce power requirements, and streamlines ammunition directional flow principles to provide a lower system resistance. Thus, the new design requires significantly less than currently accepted minimum standard power requirements and current draw to operate efficiently.
Still, other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, given for the purpose of disclosure, and taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
For a further understanding of the nature and objects of the present inventions, reference should be made to the following detailed disclosure, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like parts are given like reference numerals, and wherein:
The following detailed description of various embodiments of the present invention references the accompanying drawings, which illustrate specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. While the illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described with particularity, it will be understood that various other modifications will be apparent to and can be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the claims appended hereto to be limited to the examples and descriptions set forth herein but rather that the claims be construed as encompassing all the features of patentable novelty which reside in the present invention, including all features which would be treated as equivalents thereof by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. Therefore, the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
A cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a machine gun is shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Each firing pin block 14 is secured into the firing pin spool 18 by means of two firing pin guide rods 17 that provide directional stability of the firing pin block 14. The firing pin guide rods 17 may be made of any suitable material. In a preferred embodiment, the firing pin guide rod 17 is made from a hardened steel rod. The firing pin block 14 is mechanically cocked as it orbits inside the inclined firing pin cam 15.
The firing pin blocks 14 contain an externally mounted cam bearing 20 that rides on the aft side of the inclined firing pin cam 15 and that provides the “cocking” action of the individual firing pin blocks 14 to supply the necessary energy required to discharge the fed ammunition rounds when the drop off point on the cam 15 is reached. The cam bearing 20 may be any suitable bearing. In a preferred embodiment, the cam bearing 20 is a miniature precision stainless steel ball bearing.
As shown by
As shown in
The barrel assembly (
As shown in
As shown by
The drive motor 37 (
The cylinder retainer frame 40 (
The weapon cover (
The accessory handle (
The weapon system may be mounted to a host vehicle by means of an optional weapon swivel mount (
During one revolution of the firing pin spool 18 and the drive cylinders 2a and 2b, eight ammunition rounds are fired. With reliance on standard bolts and extraction methods eliminated, the rate of fire of the weapon can be adjusted to as needed depending upon the amount of current flowing through the drive motor 37. The rate of fire is controlled by the drive motor 37 via the variable speed trigger and grip 39 assembly. For example, if the weapon operates at 500 revolutions per minute, the total rate of fire is 4000 rounds per minute, (i.e., eight rounds per revolution times five hundred revolutions per minute equals four thousand rounds per minute).
A plurality of views of an embodiment of an ammunition case and link is shown in
The ammunition case 51 may be machined, cast, deep drawn or otherwise manufactured from a variety of materials including, but not limited to, stainless steel (all types), titanium, aluminum, brass, and combinations thereof. Alternatively, the ammunition case 51 may be made from plastics, polymers, composites, synthetics and combinations thereof.
In an embodiment, the ammunition case 51 may be machined, cast or manufactured to accept a conventional rifle primer 53 (
A sabot 63 is pressed into the chamber 54 of the ammunition case 51. The sabot 63 contains the projectile 64 and the propellant 62. See
In order to change caliber or projectile type, only three alterations must be made to the weapon system: 1) ammunition cartridge 73 or projectile type 64 and propellant 62, 2) sabot 63, and 3) barrels 25. In particular, the barrels 25 of the machine gun 1 must be the same caliber as the ammunition cartridge or projectile type employed. No other machine gun 1 alterations are necessary to change calibers or projectile type.
The ammunition link 52 (
The ammunition links 52 serve the purpose of joining individual ammunition cases 51 together to form an ammunition belt 80. The ammunition link 52 also serves as a pivotal point for the ammunition belt 80, resulting in flexibility of the belt 80.
An orifice 55 (
The empty ammunition case 51 is depicted from the front or projectile end (
The ammunition case 51 is depicted from the aft or primer end (
An ammunition case and link assembly is shown in
The conventional rifle primer (
Another ammunition case and link assembly is shown in
The conventional center-fire ammunition case 71 may be machined, cast, deep drawn or otherwise manufactured from a variety of materials including, but not limited to, stainless steel (all types), titanium, aluminum, brass, and combinations thereof. Alternatively, the conventional center-fire ammunition case 71 may be made from plastics, polymers, composites, synthetics and combinations thereof.
The conventional center-fire ammunition case 71 may be manufactured to deploy any caliber of conventionally manufactured center-fire ammunition 72 from the 0.17 Hornady® Magnum Rimfire (HMR) to the 0.50 Browning® Machine Gun (BMG) cartridge. Accordingly, this ammunition case 71 allows numerous different calibers to be fired from the same weapon system.
The conventional center-fire ammunition link 72 may be either be integrally machined or cast with the conventional center-fire ammunition case 71, or, alternatively, the link 72 may be separately machined, deep drawn, cast or stamped and press-fit onto the ammunition case 71. If the link 72 is made separately, the conventional center-fire ammunition link 72 may be machined, cast, deep drawn or otherwise manufactured from a variety of materials including, but not limited to, stainless steel (all types), titanium, aluminum, brass, and combinations thereof. Alternatively, the link 72 may be made from plastics, polymers, composites, synthetics and combinations thereof.
The conventional center-fire cartridge 73 is inserted into the aft end of the conventional center-fire ammunition case 71. Each conventional center-fire ammunition case 71 is caliber specific because each case 71 is manufactured to accept a single caliber only. Importantly, the machine gun 1 can fire either the ammunition round 19 or the conventional center-fire ammunition round 69 interchangeably for identical calibers.
An embodiment of an ammunition belt is shown in
In
An embodiment of a linkless ammunition belt is shown in
As used herein, the terms “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” means one or more.
As used herein, the term “and/or,” when used in a list of two or more items, means that any one of the listed items can be employed by itself, or any combination of two or more of the listed items can be employed. For example, if a composition is described as containing components A, B, and/or C, the composition can contain A alone; B alone; C alone: A and B in combination; A and C in combination; B and C in combination; or A, B, and C in combination.
As used herein, the terms “comprising,” “comprises,” and “comprise” are open-ended transition terms used to transition from a subject recited before the term to one or elements recited after the term, where the element or elements listed after the transition term are not necessarily the only elements that make up of the subject.
As used herein, the terms “containing,” “contains,” and “contain” have the same open-ended meaning as “comprising,” “comprises,” and “comprise,” provided above.
As used herein, the terms “having,” “has,” and “have” have the same open-ended meaning as “comprising,” “comprises,” and “comprise,” provided above.
As used herein, the terms “including,” “includes,” and “include” have the same open-ended meaning as “comprising,” “comprises,” and “comprise,” provided above.
As used herein, the term “simultaneously” means occurring at the same time or about the same time, including concurrently.
All patents and patent applications, articles, reports, and other documents cited herein are fully incorporated by reference to the extent they are not inconsistent with this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/042665 | 7/20/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/23/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/046653 | 4/21/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
290622 | Accles | Dec 1883 | A |
332741 | Palmer | Dec 1885 | A |
1164498 | Glov | Dec 1915 | A |
1307316 | O'Malley | Jun 1919 | A |
1328230 | Johnston | Jan 1920 | A |
1399119 | Hodges | Dec 1921 | A |
1424751 | Bangerter | Aug 1922 | A |
2317579 | Bacon | Apr 1943 | A |
2426527 | Sanford | Aug 1947 | A |
2970521 | Bell | Feb 1961 | A |
2983223 | Dardick | May 1961 | A |
3041939 | Dardick | Jul 1962 | A |
3046890 | Dardick | Jul 1962 | A |
3262367 | Martwick et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3429220 | Goode | Feb 1969 | A |
3434380 | Dardick | Mar 1969 | A |
3467276 | Dardick | Sep 1969 | A |
3507219 | Dardick | Apr 1970 | A |
3540345 | Wolfe | Nov 1970 | A |
3611871 | Kirpatrick et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3688637 | Tan | Sep 1972 | A |
3698283 | Ashley et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3762328 | Rocha | Oct 1973 | A |
3855931 | Dardick | Dec 1974 | A |
4934244 | Johnson, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
5315913 | Rossier et al. | May 1994 | A |
5580474 | Smith | Dec 1996 | A |
6152125 | Piper | Nov 2000 | A |
6578463 | Ross, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6742434 | Dillon | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7073426 | White | Jul 2006 | B1 |
20050011349 | Rohrbaugh et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050262996 | O'Dwyer | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060207418 | Burke | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070261587 | Chung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080092726 | Dillon | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20120118132 | Coker et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120227577 | Dillon | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jun. 10, 2011 for PCT/US2010/42655 filed Jul. 20, 2010. |
Written Opinion of the ISA dated Jun. 10, 2011 for PCT/US2010/42655 filed Jul. 20, 2010. |
Honeywell Multiple Grenade Launcher Mk18Mod 0 (HMGL) 40mm, Manufactured byHoneywell Corporation, Hopkins, Minnesota. Technology Week, Feb. 6, 1967. References: Chinn, George M. The Machine Gun. vol. V. Edwards Brothers Publishing Co. Ann Arbor, Mi. 1987. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120118132 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61227573 | Jul 2009 | US |