A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The following applications are cross-referenced and incorporated herein by reference:
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/271,194 entitled “Application View Component for System Integration, ” by Mitch Upton, filed Oct. 15, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,080,092 issued Jul. 18, 2006.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,059 entitled “High Availability for Asynchronous Requests,” by Tim Potter et al., filed Nov. 13, 2002.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,656 entitled “High Availability for Event Forwarding,” by Tim Potter et at., filed Nov. 13, 2002.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,674 entitled “High Availability Event Topic,” by Tim Potter et al., filed Nov. 13, 2002.
The present invention relates to the deployment and undeployment of components such as application view components.
In present application integration (AI) systems, there can be several single points of failure. These single points of failure can include deployment or management facilities, event forwarding, event topics, remote clients, event subscriptions, response listeners, and response queues. Each of these features is tied to a single server within a server cluster. If that single server crashes, the entire AI application can become irreparably damaged and must be rebooted via a server reboot. For example, an entity in a present AI system can be pinned to the administration (“admin”) server for the cluster. If the admin server goes down, entity functions such as the deployment and undeployment of application views will be unavailable to the system while the admin server is unavailable.
Systems and methods in accordance with the present invention can overcome deficiencies in prior art systems by changing the way in which work is processed. High-availability management of application views can be obtained for application integration by utilizing redundancy in a cluster of servers. A redundant JMX server can exist on each server in the cluster of servers. Each redundant JMX server is capable of managing deployment work for the cluster, such as the deployment and undeployment of application views. Each redundant JMX server can also send a JMX notification to every other server in the cluster relating to the deployment work, such as a deploy, undeploy, or processing notification.
An administration server in the cluster can be used to manage the other servers in the cluster. The redundant JMX servers can be capable of managing the deployment work for the cluster in the event of a failure of the administration server. The redundant JMX servers can notify the administration server when the deployment work is completed, or the administration server can be configured to check the redundant JMX servers periodically for deployment work. JMX MBeans can be used to represent the state of deployed application view. These JMX MBeans can include deployment MBeans, runtime MBeans, and summary MBeans. The JMX MBeans can be generated for a user using a common management model framework, for example.
Other features, aspects, and objects of the invention can be obtained from a review of the specification, the figures, and the claims.
A system and method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention overcomes deficiencies in prior art application integration systems by changing the way in which server functions are handled. In order to eliminate one single point of failure that exists in a clustering environment, each managed server can utilize a local Java Management Extension (JMX) server. Use of a redundant JMX server on each managed node or server in a cluster can provide for the high availability of services and functions handled by those servers. Major problems can be avoided, as the AI system is not relying on a single administration server. Each managed server can have the ability to manage deployment and undeployment work. When a managed server finishes any such work, the managed server can send a notification using the JMX framework to inform the other servers in the cluster that the work has been completed. Until such a notification is sent, managed servers can be ready to take over the work.
One of the advantages of using JMX is the ability to utilize JMX notification functionality. In some systems, the failure of an admin server prevents the processing of new deployments or undeployments. The failure will not, however, prevent the continued processing of existing tasks. This continued processing is possible in part because the JMX servers are redundant across the cluster. As shown in
This might not be a cause for concern in a production environment, as it may be rare to do a new application view deployment or undeployment. Entities such as application views are typically changed, updated, or removed in a maintenance window. It can be sufficient that work that has already been deployed and is running successfully will continue to be processed by other managed servers if a managed server goes down or becomes unavailable. A user may not be able to do any new deployment or undeployment, but the cluster will be as it stood before the admin server went down and can continue to work.
A method using the system of
In other systems, each managed server can be configured to send a message, such as by multicast, to the other servers in the cluster when a deployment or undeployment occurs. This allows the other managed servers in the cluster to be aware of the deployment or undeployment, even though the admin server is unavailable. When the admin server becomes available again, it will be unaware that the deployment or undeployment occurred. This can be handled in a number of ways. For instance, a notification can be sent using the JMX framework. The admin server also can be configured to periodically check for new deployments or undeployments. The managed server accepting the deployment or undeployment can periodically attempt to contact the admin server until the admin server is notified, or can send a multicast “heartbeat” periodically to the cluster. Also, it is possible to use an event queue that will store the notification for the admin server until the admin server is available to receive the notification. Other notification methods can be used as appropriate.
High availability for application views is obtained with JMX, in one embodiment, by implementing special Management JavaBean components (MBeans) for the application views. A set of JMX MBeans can represent the state of an application view deployment within a server or server cluster. These MBeans can provide users of the AI component with the ability to see which application views have been deployed. The MBeans can also allow a user to modify properties of an application view deployment, such as pool sizes and log levels, as well as allowing the user to monitor the activity in the application view.
An application view MBean can provide a single integration point for deploy and undeploy operations, which can be managed by an application view deployer or server console. The MBean can also provide persistence. Once an MBean is deployed, the MBean can be redeployed automatically when the server restarts. The MBean can support collection of both per-server and per-cluster statistics. The MBean can be used to monitor the number of active clients, the number of events delivered of a given type, the number of times a service of a given type has been invoked, and the number of event delivery and service invocation errors encountered. The MBean can also support console integration for monitoring deploy and undeploy operations.
Deployment and management of application views can be achieved by creating an instance of custom MBeans. In one embodiment, there are three types of custom MBeans used with an application view. One such bean type is a deployment MBean. A deployment MBean can represent the deployment of the application view, as well as the static information created for the application view at design-time. Instances of this MBean can be persistent, can have cluster scope, and can be targeted at all instances in a cluster to allow for managed server independence. Instances can boot without an admin server to feed them MBeans. In single-instance or non-cluster servers, there can be a single deployment MBean.
A runtime MBean can be used to represent the runtime state of the application view within an active server. Instances of this MBean may not be persistent, but can have server-specific or local scope and can be targeted at all instances in a cluster. In single-instance or non-cluster servers, there can be a single runtime MBean.
A summary MBean can be used to aggregate statistics from the runtime MBeans in the instance servers for a cluster. Instances of this MBean may not be persistent, but can have cluster scope and can be targeted at all instances in a cluster. In single-instance or non-cluster servers, there can be a single runtime MBean, but there will still be a summary MBean to provide consistent access to statistics in both cluster and non-cluster environments.
An application view deployment MBean can represent the atomic deployment of an application view. It can contain an attribute representing the application view descriptor. This descriptor attribute can be used to persistently deploy an application view at server start-up. This can remove the need for an integration startup deployer, used in current systems, as well as the interaction between the deployer and the admin deploy manager to retrieve persistently deployed application view names from an AI properties file. The deployment of these application views can also be facilitated.
High availability components can take advantage of a common management model (Commo) framework. In a Commo framework, a descriptor can be filled out and high-level metadata can be given about an object. This metadata can be run through an MBean generation tool, which can code-generate Java classes to be added into the specific implementation details. The high-level interface to the MBean is defined in the descriptor. The descriptor and metadata can be run through the code generation tool, which generates “skeleton” Java code. Once the skeleton Java code is generated, the user, client, or application can fill in the MBean-specific details to generate a “typical” Java class.
An application view can utilize metadata that includes information such as the service name and associated system function. The metadata can also store at least some of the data needed to successfully invoke the system function. As a result, the service can require less request data from the client invoking service, as the application view can augment the data passed by the client with the stored metadata. This can be a convenient way to hide the complexity of the underlying system function invocation from the client invoking a service.
An application view deployer can create a new application view deployment MBean instance when an application view is deployed. When the application view deployment MBean is created, a registration notification can be broadcast to all interested servers in a cluster. Interested servers can be indicated as part of a “.mdf” descriptor file for a Commo MBean. When the server receives the registration notification, it can retrieve the newly-registered application view descriptor and use the descriptor to update the appropriate application view deployment cache. At this point, the server can register for changes to the application view descriptor attribute. All subsequent attribute change notifications can allow any interested server to update its application view deployment cache. Each server in the cluster will not be dependent on JMS messages to keep its cache up-to-date.
An application view runtime MBean can handle maintenance of runtime statistics and an application view deployment cache on a local server. When a new instance of the application view runtime MBean is created, it can add an entry to the application view deployment cache for use by an application view EJB on a local server.
When an application view is deployed through use of an application view deployer, certain MBeans can be created, such as one application view deployment MBean per server instance. There can also be one application view runtime MBean created per server instance and one application view summary MBean per server instance. The application view deployment MBean can contain an application view descriptor. The application view runtime MBean can have methods to get and update statistics. The application view summary MBean can have the same interface as the application view runtime MBean, but only for a task such as getting statistics. The implementation of the getter methods can search the instances in the cluster for application view runtime MBeans and return aggregate statistics. When an application view is undeployed, all MBeans deployed in the deploy phase can be deleted.
In order to track event statistics, an application view runtime MBean can have an attribute such as “EventCount” that tracks the total number of events of a given type delivered through the current application view, such as the total number delivered to all clients. This counter can be updated any time the event context sends an event.
The number of event delivery attempts that end in error can be tracked, such as with an “EventErrorCount” attribute. This attribute can be incremented any time an exception is thrown, such as from EventContext.postEvent( ).
In order to track service statistics, an application view runtime MBean can have an attribute such as “ServiceCount” that tracks the total number of invocations made on a given service for the current application view, such as the total number from all clients. This counter can be updated any time one of the “invokeService” methods is called.
The number of asynchronous invocations made on a given service can be tracked with an attribute such as “AsyncServiceCount”. This attribute can be incremented when one of the “invokeServiceAsync” methods is called.
The number of service invocations that end in error can be tracked with an attribute such as “ServiceErrorCount”. This attribute can be incremented any time an exception is thrown from invokeService methods.
In order to track client statistics, an application view runtime MBean can have an attribute such as “ClientCount” that can track the total number of aplication view clients that currently depend on this application view deployment. This counter can be updated any time a new application view object is constructed, and decremented anytime the finalizer or “close” is called.
In the overall AI system, an AI application can continue delivering events from adapters running in available nodes if a cluster server or managed server crashes. Event generators or routers running in the failed node can restart when the failed node restarts. Users can be notified that in-flight transactions have been cancelled or rolled-back, and should be retried. Wherever possible the transaction can be retried after reestablishing connections, in order to make use of resources on another live server. One example of AI reestablishing a connection is the event context as used for sending events to AI from an event router.
In the event of an admin server failure, an AI application can do the tasks listed with respect to the crash of a cluster server. The AI application should still be able to boot and reboot successfully using the previous domain and server configuration.
The use of server clustering allows an AI component, such as an event-forwarding server, event queue, or JMS server, to be used in a scalable and highly available fashion. A highly available component does not have any single points of failure, and can migrate services from failed nodes to live nodes in a cluster. Any service offered by an AI component can be targeted to several nodes in a cluster. In the event of a node failure in the cluster, the services located on the failed node can be migrated to another live node in the cluster.
In the event of a crash of a cluster or managed server, the AI application can continue accepting new work. The acceptance of new work can include the deploying and undeploying of application views and connection factories, monitoring of old application views and connection factories, delivering events from adapters, and servicing both synchronous and asynchronous service invocations. An AI application can also support the manual migration of services on the failed node to a live node, such as a singleton MDB listening on a physical destination managed by a failed JMS server. Application integration can use a singleton MDB, such as if a customer needs ordered event processing.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. Embodiments were chosen and described in order to best describe the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention, the various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/376,958, filed May 1, 2002, entitled “HIGH AVAILABILITY APPLICATION VIEW DEPLOYMENT,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5283897 | Georgiadis et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5321841 | East et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5469562 | Saether | Nov 1995 | A |
5544318 | Schmitz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5604860 | McLaughlin et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5630131 | Palevich et al. | May 1997 | A |
5748975 | Van De Vanter | May 1998 | A |
5801958 | Dangelo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828847 | Gehr et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835769 | Jervis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836014 | Faiman, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862327 | Kwang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5892913 | Adiga et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5933838 | Lomet | Aug 1999 | A |
5944794 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950010 | Hesse et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951694 | Choquier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961593 | Gabber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966535 | Benedikt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012083 | Savitzky et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6012094 | Leymann et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016495 | McKeehan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018730 | Nichols et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021443 | Bracho et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023578 | Birsan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023722 | Colyer | Feb 2000 | A |
6028997 | Leymann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029000 | Woolsey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044217 | Brealey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061721 | Ismael et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067623 | Blakley, III et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070184 | Blount et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078943 | Yu | Jun 2000 | A |
6081840 | Zhao | Jun 2000 | A |
6085030 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119143 | Dias et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119149 | Notani | Sep 2000 | A |
6128279 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131118 | Stupek, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141686 | Jackowski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141701 | Whitney | Oct 2000 | A |
6148336 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6154769 | Cherkasova et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6185734 | Saboff et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189044 | Thomson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195680 | Goldszmidt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212546 | Starkovich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222533 | Notani et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226666 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226675 | Meltzer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226788 | Schoening et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230160 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230287 | Pinard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230309 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233607 | Taylor et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237135 | Timbol | May 2001 | B1 |
6243737 | Flanagan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253230 | Couland et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269373 | Apte et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282711 | Halpern et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292830 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292932 | Baisley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311327 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317786 | Yamane et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324681 | Sebesta et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330569 | Baisley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334114 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336122 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338064 | Ault et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343265 | Glebov et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345283 | Anderson | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348970 | Marx | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349408 | Smith | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353923 | Bogel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356906 | Lippert et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360221 | Gough et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360358 | Elsbree et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367068 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374297 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377939 | Young | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6408311 | Baisley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411698 | Bauer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438594 | Bowman-Armuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442565 | Tyra et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442611 | Navarre et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445711 | Scheel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463503 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470364 | Prinzing | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6515967 | Wei et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516322 | Meredith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535908 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549949 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553425 | Shah et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560636 | Cohen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6560769 | Moore et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6584454 | Hummel, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594693 | Borwankar | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594700 | Graham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601113 | Koistinen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604198 | Beckman et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609115 | Mehring et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615258 | Barry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622168 | Datta | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636491 | Kari et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6637020 | Hammond | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643652 | Helgeson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654932 | Bahrs et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662357 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678518 | Eerola | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684387 | Acker et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684388 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687702 | Vaitheeswaran et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687848 | Najmi | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697849 | Carlson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721740 | Skinner et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721747 | Lipkin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721779 | Maffeis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732237 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748420 | Quatrano et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754884 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6782416 | Cochran et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789054 | Makhlouf | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795967 | Evans et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799718 | Chan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6802000 | Greene et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804686 | Stone et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6832238 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836883 | Abrams et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847981 | Song et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850979 | Saulpaugh et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857012 | Sim et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859834 | Arora et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6874143 | Murray et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6889244 | Gaither et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6910041 | Exton et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915519 | Williamson et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918084 | Slaughter et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922827 | Vasilik et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925482 | Gopal | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925492 | Shirriff | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950825 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950872 | Todd, II | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963914 | Breitbart et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970939 | Sim | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971096 | Ankireddipally et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976086 | Sadeghi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983328 | Beged-Dov et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993743 | Crupi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000219 | Barrett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017146 | Dellarocas | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7051072 | Stewart et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051316 | Charisius et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054858 | Sutherland | May 2006 | B2 |
7058637 | Britton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062718 | Kodosky et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069507 | Alcazar et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072934 | Helgeson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073167 | Iwashita | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080092 | Upton | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089568 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089584 | Sharma | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107578 | Alpern | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111243 | Ballard et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127704 | Van De Vanter et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143186 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146422 | Marlatt et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7150015 | Pace | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155705 | Hershberg et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7159007 | Stawikowski | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165041 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181731 | Pace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184967 | Mital et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7240331 | Vion-Dury et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020004848 | Sudarshan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010781 | Tuatini | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010803 | Oberstein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016759 | Marcready et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026630 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049788 | Lipkin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078174 | Sim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078365 | Burnette et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083075 | Brummel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083118 | Sim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083187 | Sim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111820 | Massey | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111922 | Young et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112069 | Sim | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116454 | Dyla et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120685 | Srivastava et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120786 | Sehayek et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133491 | Sim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143960 | Goren et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152106 | Stoxen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161826 | Arteaga et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165936 | Alston et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169644 | Greene | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184145 | Sijacic et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184610 | Chong et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188486 | Gil et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194244 | Raventos | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194267 | Flesner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194495 | Gladstone et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198800 | Shamrakov | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004746 | Kheirolomoom et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005181 | Bau, III et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014439 | Boughannam | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018665 | Dovin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018832 | Amirisetty et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018963 | Ashworth et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023957 | Bau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026254 | Sim | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028579 | Kulkarni et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031176 | Sim | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033437 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043191 | Tinsley et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046266 | Mullins et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046369 | Sim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046591 | Asghari-Kamrani et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055868 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055878 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061405 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074217 | Beisiegel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074467 | Oblak et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079029 | Garimella et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093402 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093403 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093470 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093471 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097345 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097574 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105884 | Upton | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110117 | Saidenberg et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110315 | Upton | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110446 | Nemer | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omoigui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145047 | Upton | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149791 | Kane et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167358 | Marvin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182452 | Upton | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196168 | Hu | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212834 | Potter | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220967 | Potter | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233631 | Curry | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015368 | Potter et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019645 | Goodman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040040011 | Bosworth et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068568 | Griffin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078373 | Ghoneimy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078440 | Potter | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133660 | Junghuber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148336 | Hubbard et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204976 | Oyama et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216086 | Bau | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225995 | Marvin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260715 | Mongeon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033663 | Narin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050223392 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060234678 | Juitt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070038500 | Hammitt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 248 634 | Mar 2000 | CA |
1 006 443 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 061 445 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0029924 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0190884 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030220967 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60376958 | May 2002 | US |