The invention relates generally to the field of metal alloys and more particularly to an electrode for depositing a metal alloy on a workpiece, and even more particularly to an electrode for depositing a hardfacing metal alloy high in boron on the surface of a workpiece.
Metal parts often fail their intended use due to wear, which causes them to lose dimension and functionality. “Hardfacing” is a technique which involves applying a layer of hard material to a substrate for the purpose of increasing the substrate's wear and corrosion resistance. The use of this technique has increased over the years as industry has come to recognize that substrates of softer, lower cost material can be hardfaced to have the same wear and corrosion resistance characteristics as more expensive substrates of a harder material. Hardfacing may be applied to a new part during production to increase its wear resistance, or it may be used to restore a worn-down surface. Hardfacing extends the service life of the workpiece and can save machine down time and production costs.
Hardfacing involves the deposition of a hard layer by welding or thermal spraying. Conventional weld hardfacing is accomplished by one of several welding techniques, including oxyfuel welding (OFW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW or TIG), hot wire GTAW, gas metal arc welding (GMAW), hot wire GMAW, shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), submerged arc welding (SAW), and flux-cored arc welding (FCAW). Plasma transferred arc (PTA) hardfacing and laser beam hardfacing can also be used. In general, a welding wire is deposited over the substrate surface to produce a weld deposit that is more wear resistant than the underlying substrate.
Hardfacing alloys are designed to provide improved wear resistance for a specific wear factor or a combination of wear factors. Abrasion performance of the deposited alloy is directly related to the amount of carbide forming metals, such as chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, and iron, in combination with carbon. Wear resisting carbides are formed when one of these metals reacts with carbon, and the balance of the carbon remains in solution to form a semi-austenitic matrix in which the hard, wear resistant carbides are evenly distributed. As the ratio of the wear resistant carbides to the alloy matrix increases, abrasion resistance increases while at the same time its impact resistance decreases.
One type of hardfacing materials are alloys known as “chromium carbides.” Their high abrasive resistance is derived from the presence in the microstructure of primary chromium carbides (M7C3) of the eutectic and/or hypereutectic type in a soft tough matrix. Because these alloys contain large amounts of chromium carbide, they are particularly good for severe abrasion resistance applications. However, chromium carbide alloys having a hardness on the Rockwell “C” hardness scale (“HRC”) greater than 62 HRC have been difficult to achieve consistently. While the primary chromium carbides formed may themselves exhibit hardness values of around 63-65 HRC, the eutectic matrix, which is the material surrounding the primary carbides, exhibits hardness values in the range of 50 to 58 HRC. This makes it difficult to achieve a consistent average hardness measurement greater than 62 HRC in a first layer deposit of such chromium carbide alloys. While weld deposits with low levels of boron or niobium or both in the eutectic matrix may exhibit higher hardness measurements at points in the eutectic matrix, the hardness tends to be inconsistent across the weld bead.
While conventional chromium carbide alloys provide good wear resistance, the weld deposits produced from chromium carbide welding wires can produce a cross-checking pattern in the hard weld deposit surface. Unless hardfacing deposits with these types of microstructures cross-check to relieve the stresses, under-bead cracks may form and material will spall from the surface. While cross-check cracking that is uniformly distributed is desirable as it indicates a consistent microstructure, longitudinal cracking is detrimental as it contributes to the likelihood of under-bead cracking. Cross-check cracking may also trap abrasive material within the space formed by the cracks and allow the abrasive material to absorb some of the wear, adding to the total abrasive resistance of the deposit.
In view of the present state of hardfacing technology, it would be highly desirable and advantageous to provide an electrode for depositing a hardfacing alloy composition having a primary carbide eutectic microstructure of high abrasive resistance for use on the surface of metal components that are subjected to high thermal and mechanical stresses and that can consistently achieve a hardness value of at least about 65 HRC in the first layer of weld deposit. Such hardfacing alloys can produce the same amount of wear resistance using a thinner layer of the hardfacing alloy, or to extend further the service life of equipment by using the same amount of the hardfacing alloy.
The present invention pertains to electrodes that deposit an alloy on a workpiece, more particularly to an electrode that deposits a hardfacing alloy on the surface of a workpiece, and even more particularly to an electrode that deposits a hardfacing metal alloy high in boron on the surface of a workpiece. The hardfacing alloy deposited on the workpiece preferably includes a eutectic matrix having a fine grain size, small evenly dispersed carbides within the matrix, and a small amount of carbon in the matrix. The primary phase is a primary metal carbide of the type M7C3 that consists of chrome, boron, manganese, silicon, or any combination thereof.
The hardfacing alloy deposited by the electrode of the present invention is particularly useful as a metal surfacing on materials subjected to high thermal and mechanical stresses. The hardfacing alloy deposited by the electrode of the present invention has a unique combination of boron, chromium, carbon, manganese, and silicon. Generally, the hardfacing alloy formed from the electrode of the present invention includes, by atomic percent, at least about 2.5% boron, at least about 15.0% chromium; at least about 14.0% carbon, at least about 0.75% manganese, at least about 0.75% silicon, and the balance is iron.
The hardfacing alloy deposited by the electrode of the present invention has a hardness in the range of at least about 65 HRC in the first layer of weld deposit, and an ASTM G-65A wear result of less than 0.10 grams of material lost.
The hardfacing alloy can be deposited by any combination of various types of electrodes and various types of welding processes. For instance, the electrode of the present invention can be a self shielding electrode or a gas shielded electrode. When the electrode is a gas shielded electrode, the shielding gas is generally CO2, Argon, or a CO2-Argon mixture; however, other shielding gasses can be used. The electrode of the present invention can be a solid wire electrode, a flux coated electrode, a flux cored electrode, a metal filled electrode, etc. As such, the electrode of the present invention can be used in several different types of welding processes such as, but not limited to, neutral SAW flux with alloyed cored/solid electrode, alloyed SAW flux with alloyed cored/solid electrode, alloyed SAW flux with unalloyed cored/solid electrode, cored electrode with an alloyed/unalloyed sheath and alloyed/unalloyed fill. As can be appreciated, other types of electrodes and other types of welding processes can be used.
In one non-limiting example, the hardfacing alloy deposited by the electrode of the present invention includes, by atomic (“at”) percent:
The hardfacing alloy set forth above may include additional alloying materials. In particular, it may include additional alloying materials that form mixed carbides with the chromium, such as, for example, at least one metal selected from the group consisting of niobium, molybdenum, and vanadium.
Nitrogen is also intentionally added to the hardfacing alloy to form nitrides with the boron or chromium, or both. Nitrogen also forms nitrides with niobium, molybdenum, and vanadium if one or more of these additional alloying materials are present. The nitrogen is preferably added as part of the welding process, e.g., through the use of a shielding gas, self shielding, or as part of an alloy with one or more of the metals included in the electrode. Preferably, the amount of nitrogen added ranges from about 60 to about 300 parts per million.
In one non-limiting embodiment, the composition of the weld deposited by an electrode of the present invention, in atomic percent, comprises 4.42% boron, 14.81% carbon, 16.69% chromium, 1.71% manganese, 1.01% silicon, and the balance is iron. The hardfacing alloy having such a composition deposited on ASTM A36 steel had an average hardness of 65 HRC as measured by a Rockwell C hardness tester and an average hardness value (HV) on the Vicker's Scale of 990.
In another non-limiting embodiment, the composition of the weld deposited by an electrode of the present invention, in atomic percent, comprises 4.08% boron, 17.67% carbon, 16.81% chromium, 1.66% manganese, 1.23% silicon, and the balance is iron. The hardfacing alloy having such a composition deposited on ASTM A36 steel had an average hardness of 67 HRC as measured by a Rockwell C hardness tester and an average hardness value (HV) on the Vicker's Scale of 966.
As can be appreciated, the hardfacing alloy deposited by an electrode of the present invention can have other compositions.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an electrode used to deposit an alloy on a workpiece.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an electrode used to deposit a hardfacing alloy for use on materials subjected to high thermal and mechanical stresses to increase thereby the life of such materials.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an electrode used to deposit a hardfacing alloy high in boron on the surface of a workpiece that can consistently achieve a hardness value of at least about 65 HRC in the first layer of weld deposit.
These and other objects and advantages will become apparent from the following discussion of the invention.
This invention may be more readily understood by reference to the following drawings wherein:
Referring to the following description of the invention for purposes of describing preferred embodiments of the invention only, and not for the purpose of limiting the invention, the electrode of the present invention is formulated to produce a hardfacing alloy composition on a metal surface. Such a hardfacing alloy has an average hardness of at least about 65 HRC in the welded state and/or the tempered state in a single layer deposit on a workpiece, such as a standard steel like ASTM A36, and an ASTM G65A wear result of less than 0.10 grams of material lost. The hardfacing electrode is particularly formulated to deposit a welding alloy having at least about 2.5 to about 14 atomic percent boron for use as a surfacing on metals subjected to high thermal and mechanical stresses utilizing a primary carbide eutectic matrix type microstructure.
The hardfacing alloy deposited by an electrode of the present invention has a composition, by atomic (“at”) percent, as follows:
The hardfacing electrode set forth above may include additional alloying materials. In particular, it may include additional alloying materials that form mixed carbides with the chromium, such as, for example, at least one metal selected from the group consisting of niobium, molybdenum, and vanadium.
Nitrogen is also intentionally added to the hardfacing alloy to form nitrides with the boron or chromium, or both. Nitrogen also forms nitrides with niobium, molybdenum, and vanadium if one or more of these additional alloying materials are present. The nitrogen is preferably added as part of the welding process, e.g., through the use of a shielding gas, self shielding, or as part of an alloy with one or more of the metals included in the electrode. Preferably, the amount of nitrogen added ranges from about 60 to about 300 parts per million.
The chemical analysis of one non-limiting hardfacing alloy deposited by an electrode of the present invention, by atomic percent, is as follows:
The hardfacing alloy as welded on ASTM A36 steel having the composition set forth in Table 1 had an average hardness of 65 HRC as measured by a Rockwell C hardness tester and an average hardness value (HV) on the Vicker's Scale of 990.
The chemical analysis of another non-limiting hardfacing alloy deposited by an electrode of the present invention, by atomic percent, is as follows:
The hardfacing alloy as welded on ASTM A36 steel having the composition set forth in Table 2 had an average hardness of 67 HRC as measured by a Rockwell C hardness tester and an average hardness value (HV) on the Vicker's Scale of 966.
The believed functions of each of these components of the hardfacing alloy will be described; however, it will be appreciated that these are only the believed functions of the components, thus the components could have other or additional functions in the hardfacing alloy.
The boron (B) in the hardfacing alloy is believed to provide interstitial hardening in the matrix, and to strengthen the grain boundaries by accommodating mismatches due to incident lattice angles of neighboring grains with respect to the common grain boundary. The amount of boron included in the hardfacing alloys of the present invention should be enough to achieve the desired hardness levels. However, too much boron appears to interfere with the solidification of the hardfacing alloy and its ability to stick to the workpiece, and may lead to under-bead cracking. Generally, the preferred amount of boron is at least about 2.5 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy up to about 14 atomic percent, more preferably from about 4.0 to about 13 atomic percent, and even more preferably from about 7.0 to about 12 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy.
The carbon (C) in the hardfacing alloy is believed to influence the hardness level and strength of the hardfacing alloy. The amount of carbon included in the hardfacing alloys of the present invention should be enough to achieve the desired hardness levels by forming primary carbides of the M7C3 variety and forming secondary mixed metal carbides in the eutectic matrix. If there is too much carbon, the excess carbon either will not enter into solution and will not enter the weld pool, or it will precipitate out as graphite. Generally, the carbon content of the hardfacing alloy is at least about 14 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy up to about 25 atomic percent, and more preferably from about 17 to about 22 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy.
The chromium (Cr) in the hardfacing alloy is believed to improve the hardness and strength of the hardfacing alloy as well as to affect its corrosion resistance. The amount of chromium included in the hardfacing alloys of the present invention should be enough to achieve the desired hardness levels by forming primary carbides of the M7C3 variety. Generally, the chromium content of the hardfacing alloy is preferably at least about 15 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy up to about 26 atomic percent, and more preferably from about 18 to about 21 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy.
The manganese (Mn) in the hardfacing alloy is believed to improve hardness and toughness and to act as a deoxidizer by removing oxygen from the liquid weld metal. Manganese is also believed to act as a grain refiner and to stabilize cross-checking so that the cracks that form in the weld alloy are more consistent and evenly spaced. Too little manganese appears to affect the consistency of the spacing of the cracks. Generally, the preferred amount of manganese in the hardfacing alloy is at least about 0.75 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy up to about 3.0 atomic percent.
The silicon (Si) is believed to act as a deoxidizer to improve corrosion resistance and to act as a grain refiner. Silicon also acts as a surface tension modifier to the molten weld pool. This allows for superior wetting of the puddle and provides excellent tie-in performance when welding. Too little silicon interferes with the wetting of the puddle, while too much silicon can make the weld pool too fluid. The preferred amount of silicon is at least about 0.75 atomic percent of the hardfacing alloy up to about 3.0 atomic percent.
The nitrogen (N) makes possible the formation of nitrides in the eutectic matrix which aids in achieving the desired hardness. The nitrides may include carbo-nitrides, boro-nitrides, boro-carbonitrides, etc., as well as any other similar combinations with other alloying materials that may be present. Too little nitrogen means that not enough nitrides will form to achieve the desired hardness, while too much nitrogen leads to the formation of voids in the weld deposit, thereby increasing its porosity. The nitrogen is preferably present in an amount ranging from about 60 to about 300 parts per million.
Other known metals can be included in the welds made by this invention, provided that they do not adversely affect the microstructure of the hardfacing alloy in any significant way. Such metals may include, for example, niobium, vanadium, and molybdenum, each of which can form mixed carbides with chrome to produce a microstructure with a higher average hardness. Generally, when present the amount of each of these metals is less than about 3.0 atomic percent.
Turning to the drawings,
The hardfacing electrode of the present invention is designed and formulated so that the desired hardfacing alloy composition can be deposited by any suitable welding means and methods such as, but not limited to, open arc, gas, or flux shielded. The electrode can be a self shielding electrode or it can be used in the presence of a shielding gas. The formed hardfacing alloy can be applied by directly depositing the metal particles on the workpiece or it can be spray coated on the workpiece. As such, the formed hardfacing alloy can be applied by a variety of processes such as, but not limited to, oxyfuel welding (OFW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW or TIG), hot wire GTAW, gas metal arc welding (GMAW), hot wire GMAW, shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), submerged arc welding (SAW), and flux-cored arc welding (FCAW). Plasma transferred arc (PTA) hardfacing and laser beam hardfacing can also be used.
The electrode that is used to form the desired hardfacing alloys is typically a cored wire electrode; however, it will be appreciated that the electrode could be a solid wire, a solid wire electrode that includes a flux coating, a flux cored electrode that includes a flux coating, etc. When the electrode is a coated or cored electrode, the coating or fill material in the core, or both, can include alloying agents, fluxing agents, slag agents, gas generating agents, etc. The electrode of the present invention can be a gas shielded electrode, a self shielded electrode, a strip material (using strip cladding, etc.), a manual electrode, a subarc electrode having an active flux, and the like.
In one non-limiting embodiment of the present invention, the electrode is a cored electrode that includes a metal sheath and a fill composition. The metal sheath is generally formed primarily from an iron alloy (e.g., carbon steel, low carbon steel, stainless steel, low alloy steel, etc.), but as can be appreciated, other types of metal sheaths can be used. When the electrode is a cored electrode, the fill composition typically constitutes at least about 1 weight percent of the total electrode weight, and not more than about 65 weight percent of the total electrode weight, typically about 10 to about 60 weight percent of the total electrode weight, more typically about 15 to about 55 weight percent of the total electrode weight, and even more typically about 25 to about 53 weight percent of the total electrode weight; however, it can be appreciated that other weight percentages can be used.
The fill composition can include one or more flux or slag components, or both; however, such components are not required. The flux and slag components, when included in the fill composition, can include one or more metal oxides (e.g., aluminum oxide, boron oxide, calcium oxide, chromium oxide, iron oxide, magnesium oxide, niobium oxide, potassium oxide, silicon dioxide, sodium oxide, tin oxide, titanium oxide, vanadium oxide, zirconium oxide, etc.), metal carbonates (e.g., calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, etc.), and/or metal fluorides (e.g., barium fluoride, bismuth fluoride, calcium fluoride, potassium fluoride, sodium fluoride, Teflon, etc.), other refractory silacious materials, and other elements and compounds (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorous, sulfur, etc.). These one or more flux or slag components, or both, can be used to improve arc stability, provide gas shielding, modify the slag characteristics, modify the composition of the hardfacing alloy, etc., and may be selected to closely match the desired composition or to obtain the desired properties of the deposited hardfacing alloy. When flux and/or slag components are included in the fill composition, these flux components generally constitute less than about 50 weight percent of the fill composition, typically less than about 30 weight percent of the fill composition, and even more typically about 0.05 to about 10 weight percent of the fill composition; however, it can be appreciated that other weight percentages can be used.
Incidentally, it is well known to skilled welding engineers that the composition of a weld produced by non-autogenous welding depends on a number of factors including the composition of the weld filler material used, the composition of the flux and/or shielding gas used, and the particular type of non-autogenous welding procedure used. In addition, it is also well known that the composition of the weld can be determined fairly precisely by suitably selecting and coordinating these variables. Accordingly, the inventive process is described herein in terms of the chemical composition of the weld ultimately produced, it being understood that a skilled welding engineer can easily achieve this chemical composition by suitable adjustment of the above variables in accordance with known techniques.
These and other modifications of the discussed embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. All such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention, and it is to be distinctly understood that the foregoing descriptive matter is to be interpreted merely as illustrative of the present invention and not as a limitation thereof. Rather, the scope of the present invention is to be limited only by the following claims:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3334975 | Quass et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
4172162 | Danzey, Jr. | Oct 1979 | A |
4192983 | Paoletti | Mar 1980 | A |
4394560 | Kishida et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4396822 | Kishida et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4426428 | Kammer et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4430122 | Pauga | Feb 1984 | A |
4738389 | Moshier et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741974 | Longo et al. | May 1988 | A |
4810850 | Tenkula et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5004886 | Born et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5093148 | Christodoulou et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5250355 | Newman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5294462 | Kaiser et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5332628 | Drossman | Jul 1994 | A |
5365036 | Crockett et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5755298 | Langford, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5910376 | Kelly | Jun 1999 | A |
5933701 | Stucker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6103997 | Pan | Aug 2000 | A |
6138779 | Boyce | Oct 2000 | A |
6469278 | Boyce | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479165 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6565678 | Fairchild et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6603090 | Schreiber et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6784402 | Kataoka et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6888088 | Bolton et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7256369 | Seitz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7361411 | Daemen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7491910 | Kapoor et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7553382 | Branagan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553563 | Grau et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569286 | Daemen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7645493 | Seitz | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7807948 | Katiyar | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7884305 | Soltis et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7935198 | Branagan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7939182 | Cottignies et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8097095 | Branagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8258432 | Narayanan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8322466 | Bird | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8330078 | Gerth et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8419868 | Lai | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20040084421 | Bolton et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060165552 | Kapoor | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070029295 | Branagan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070187369 | Menon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080241584 | Daemen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251507 | Dolman | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100112374 | Knauf | May 2010 | A1 |
20110114606 | Suzuki | May 2011 | A1 |
20110315051 | Olsen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120097658 | Wallin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120224992 | Cheney | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130045334 | Seals | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130052361 | Croopnick | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130094900 | Folkmann et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130260177 | Wallin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
108688 | Oct 2005 | BG |
1137433 | Dec 1996 | CN |
1162513 | Oct 1997 | CN |
1775454 | May 2005 | CN |
1714987 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1786271 | Jun 2006 | CN |
1843681 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1858293 | Nov 2006 | CN |
100999042 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101058130 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101073861 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101148008 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101224527 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101343721 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101406994 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101439448 | May 2009 | CN |
101516567 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101524789 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101545088 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101602152 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101653875 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101664862 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101670501 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101724805 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102069317 | May 2011 | CN |
102069322 | May 2011 | CN |
102181814 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102251205 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102275051 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102319968 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102321861 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102343487 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102357750 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102380716 | Mar 2012 | CN |
102407411 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102416534 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102554494 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102699495 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102744532 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102886620 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102886621 | Jan 2013 | CN |
527626 | Feb 1993 | EP |
1209246 | May 2002 | EP |
1872891 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1224678 | Mar 1971 | GB |
1319465 | Jun 1973 | GB |
1350193 | Apr 1974 | GB |
2250030 | May 1992 | GB |
54-062145 | May 1979 | JP |
58-141893 | Aug 1983 | JP |
59-141396 | Aug 1984 | JP |
60-221197 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61-206589 | Sep 1986 | JP |
62-259698 | Nov 1987 | JP |
63-013693 | Jan 1988 | JP |
64-083397 | Mar 1989 | JP |
05-212587 | Aug 1993 | JP |
2010-201506 | Sep 2010 | JP |
20000023732 | Apr 2000 | KR |
20030093452 | Dec 2003 | KR |
2373039 | Nov 2009 | RU |
2429957 | Sep 2011 | RU |
2004001089 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2007120205 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008011448 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2010110873 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Berns, et al. “Microstructure of Fe—Cr—C Hardfacing Alloys with Additions of Nb, Ti and B”, Metallography 20: 401-429 (1987). |
Fan, et al., “Microstructure change caused by (Cr,Fe)23C6 carbides in high chromium Fe—Cr—C hardfacing alloys”, Science Direct, Surface & Coatings Technology, 201, 908-912 (2006). |
Sapate, et al., “Erosive wear behaviour of weld hardfacing high chromium cast irons: effect of erodent particles”, Tribology International 39, 206-212 (2006). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000882 mailed Dec. 15, 2014. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority on Patentability from PCT/IB2014/000882 dated Dec. 1, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140353285 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |