High brightness x-ray reflection source

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10991538
  • Patent Number
    10,991,538
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 5, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 27, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
An x-ray target, x-ray source, and x-ray system are provided. The x-ray target includes a thermally conductive substrate comprising a surface and at least one structure on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface. The at least one structure includes a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate. The first material has a length along a first direction parallel to the portion of the surface in a range greater than 1 millimeter and a width along a second direction parallel to the portion of the surface and perpendicular to the first direction. The width is in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters. The at least one structure further includes at least one layer over the first material. The at least one layer includes at least one second material different from the first material. The at least one layer has a thickness in a range of 2 microns to 50 microns. The at least one second material is configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field

This application relates generally to x-ray sources.


Description of the Related Art

Laboratory x-ray sources generally bombard a metal target with electrons, with the deceleration of these electrons producing Bremsstrahlung x-rays of all energies from zero to the kinetic energy of the electrons. In addition, the metal target produces x-rays by creating holes in the inner core electron orbitals of the target atoms, which are then filled by electrons of the target with binding energies that are lower than the inner core electron orbitals, with concomitant generation of x-rays with energies that are characteristic of the target atoms. Most of the power of the electrons irradiating the target is converted into heat (e.g., about 60%) and backscattered electrons (e.g., about 39%), with only about 1% of the incident power converted into x-rays. Melting of the x-ray target due to this heat can be a limiting factor for the ultimate brightness (e.g., photons per second per area per steradian) achievable by the x-ray source.


Transmission-type x-ray sources configured to generate microfocus or nanofocus x-ray beams generally utilize targets comprising a thin sputtered metal layer (e.g., tungsten) over a thermally conductive, low density substrate material (e.g., diamond). The metal layer on one side of the target is irradiated by electrons, and the x-ray beam comprises x-rays emitted from the opposite side of the target. The x-ray spot size is dependent on the electron beam spot size, and in addition, due to electron bloom within the target, the x-rays generated and emitted from the target have an effective focal spot size that is larger than the focal spot size of the incident electron beam. As a result, transmission-type x-ray sources generating microfocus or nanofocus x-ray beams generally require very thin targets and very good electron beam focusing.


Conventional reflection-type x-ray sources irradiate a surface of a bulk target metal (e.g., tungsten) and collect the x-rays transmitted from the irradiated target surface at a take-off angle (e.g., 6-30 degrees) relative to the irradiated target surface, with the take-off angle selected to optimize the accumulation of x-rays while balancing with self-absorption of x-rays produced in the target. Because the electron beam spot at the target is effectively seen at an angle in reflection-type x-ray sources, the x-ray source spot size can be smaller than the electron beam spot size in transmission-type x-ray sources.


SUMMARY

Certain embodiments described herein provide an x-ray target. The x-ray target comprises a thermally conductive substrate comprising a surface and at least one structure on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface. The at least one structure comprises a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate. The first material has a length along a first direction parallel to the portion of the surface in a range greater than 1 millimeter and a width along a second direction parallel to the portion of the surface and perpendicular to the first direction. The width is in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters. The at least one structure further comprises at least one layer over the first material. The at least one layer comprises at least one second material different from the first material. The at least one layer has a thickness in a range of 2 microns to 50 microns. The at least one second material is configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons having energies in an energy range of 0.5 keV to 160 keV.


Certain embodiments described herein provide an x-ray source. The x-ray source comprises an x-ray target comprising a thermally conductive substrate comprising a surface and at least one structure on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface. The at least one structure comprises a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate. The first material has a length along a first direction parallel to the portion of the surface in a range greater than 1 millimeter and a width along a second direction parallel to the portion of the surface and perpendicular to the first direction. The width is in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters. The at least one structure further comprises at least one layer over the first material. The at least one layer comprises at least one second material different from the first material. The at least one layer has a thickness in a range of 2 microns to 50 microns. The at least one second material is configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons having energies in an energy range of 0.5 keV to 160 keV. The x-ray source further comprises an electron source configured to generate electrons in at least one electron beam and to direct the at least one electron beam to impinge the at least one structure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1C schematically illustrate portions of example x-ray targets in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIGS. 2A and 2B schematically illustrate portions of example x-ray targets having a plurality of structures separate from one another in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an example x-ray source of an example x-ray system in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIGS. 4A and 4B schematically illustrate other examples of an x-ray source in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 5A schematically illustrates an example x-ray target in accordance with certain embodiments described herein, and FIGS. 5B-5I schematically illustrate various simulation results of the brightness from various versions of the example x-ray target of FIG. 5A.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain embodiments described herein provide a reflection-type x-ray source which advantageously achieves small x-ray spot sizes while using electron beam spot sizes larger than those used in transmission-type x-ray sources (e.g., utilizing less rigorous electron beam focusing as compared to that used in transmission-type x-ray sources).


Certain embodiments described herein advantageously provide a reflection-type x-ray source with a high brightness of x-rays while avoiding the deleterious effects of excessive heating of the target. By using a cooled substrate and a high thermal conductivity first material (e.g., diamond) in thermal communication with the substrate and having a target layer of a second material deposited on the first material, heat can advantageously be removed from the target layer at a rate faster than would be achieved by removing the heat through bulk target material.


Certain embodiments described herein advantageously provide a reflection-type x-ray source with multiple target materials within a “sealed tube” source. By configuring the x-ray source to use an electron beam to irradiate a selected target material of the multiple target materials, with each target material generating x-rays having a corresponding x-ray spectrum with different characteristic x-ray energies, the reflection-type x-ray source can advantageously provide multiple, selectable x-ray spectra so that the x-ray source can be optimized for different applications, without having to open the x-ray source to change targets and to pump down the x-ray source each time.



FIGS. 1A-1C schematically illustrate portions of example x-ray targets 10 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. In each of FIGS. 1A-1C, the x-ray target 10 comprises a thermally conductive substrate 20 comprising a surface 22 and at least one structure 30 on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface 22. The at least one structure 30 comprises a thermally conductive first material 32 in thermal communication with the substrate 20. The first material 32 has a length L along a first direction 34 parallel to the portion of the surface 22, the length L in a range greater than 1 millimeter. The first material 32 also has a width W along a second direction 36 parallel to the portion of the surface 22 and perpendicular to the first direction 34, the width Win a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters (e.g., 0.2 millimeter to 1 millimeter). The at least one structure 30 further comprises at least one layer 40 over the first material 32, the at least one layer 40 comprises at least one second material 42 different from the first material 32. The at least one layer 40 has a thickness T in a range of 1 micron to 50 microns (e.g., in a range of 1 micron to 20 microns; tungsten layer thickness in a range of 1 micron to 4 microns; copper layer thickness in a range of 2 microns to 7 microns), and the at least one second material 42 is configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons having energies in an energy range of 0.5 keV to 160 keV.


In certain embodiments, the target 10 is configured to transfer heat away from the at least one structure 30. For example, the surface 22 of the substrate 20 can comprise at least one thermally conductive material and the remaining portion of the substrate 20 can comprise the same at least one thermally conductive material and/or another one or more thermally conductive materials. Examples of the at least one thermally conductive material include but are not limited to, metals (e.g., copper; beryllium; doped graphite), metal alloys, metal composites, and electrically insulating but thermally conducting materials (e.g., diamond; graphite; diamond-like carbon; silicon; boron nitride; silicon carbide; sapphire). In certain embodiments, the at least one thermally conductive material has a thermal conductivity in a range between 20 W/m-K and 2500 W/m-K (e.g., between 150 W/m-K and 2500 W/m-K; between 200 W/m-K and 2500 W/m-K; between 2000 W/m-K and 2500 W/m-K) and comprises elements with atomic numbers less than or equal to 14. The surface 22 of the substrate 20 is electrically conductive in certain embodiments and is configured to be in electrical communication with an electrical potential (e.g., electrical ground) and is configured to prevent charging of the surface 22 due to electron irradiation of the target 10. In certain embodiments, the target 10 comprises a heat transfer structure in thermal communication with the substrate 20 and configured to transfer heat away from the target 10. Examples of heat transfer structures include but are not limited to, heat sinks, heat pipes, and fluid flow conduits configured to have a fluid coolant (e.g., liquid; water; deionized water; air; refrigerant; heat transfer fluid such as Galden® Perfluoropolyether fluorinated fluids marketed by Solvay S.A. of Brussels, Belgium) flow therethrough and to transfer heat away from the substrate 20 (e.g., at a rate similar to the power loading rate of the target 10 from the electron irradiation).


In certain embodiments, the thermally conductive first material 32 is configured to be adhered (e.g., joined; fixed; brazed; soldered) to the surface 22 of the substrate 20, such that the first material 32 is in thermal communication with the substrate 20. For example, the first material 32 can be soldered or brazed onto the surface 22 with a thermally conductive soldering or brazing material, examples of which include but are not limited to: CuSil-ABA® or Nioro® brazing alloys marketed by Morgan Advanced Materials of Windsor, Berkshire, United Kingdom; gold/copper braze alloys. As schematically illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B, in certain embodiments, the first material 32 is on the surface 22 and is adhered to the surface 22 by a soldering or brazing material (not shown) extending along at least a portion of the first material 32 and mechanically coupled to both the first material 32 and the surface 22. The soldering or brazing material can enhance (e.g., improve; facilitate) the thermal conductivity between the first material 32 and the surface 22. In certain other embodiments, the first material 32 is over the surface 22 with soldering or brazing material extending along at least a portion of the first material 32 and between the first material 32 and the surface 22, mechanically coupled to both the first material 32 and the surface 22, and enhancing (e.g., improving; facilitating) the thermal conductivity between the first material 32 and the surface 22. In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by FIG. 1C, the surface 22 comprises a recess 24 configured to have the first material 32 inserted partially into the recess 24 such that the structure 30 is embedded in at least a portion of the surface 22. The first material 32 can be adhered to the surface 22 by soldering or brazing material (not shown) extending along at least a portion of the first material 32, mechanically coupled to both the first material 32 and the surface 22, and enhancing (e.g., improving; facilitating) the thermal conductivity between the first material 32 and the surface 22.


Examples of the first material 32 include but are not limited to, at least one of: diamond, silicon carbide, beryllium, and sapphire. While FIG. 1A schematically illustrates the first material 32 having a half-cylinder, prism, or parallelepiped shape (e.g., ribbon; bar; strip; strut; finger; slab; plate) having substantially straight sides, any other shape (e.g., regular; irregular; geometric; non-geometric) with straight, curved, and/or irregular sides is also compatible with certain embodiments described herein. In certain embodiments, the length L of the first material 32 is the largest extent of the first material 32 in the first direction 34, and the width W of the first material 32 is the largest extent of the first material 32 in the second direction 36. The length L can be in a range greater than 1 millimeter, greater than 5 millimeters, 1 millimeter to 4 millimeters, 1 millimeter to 10 millimeters, or 1 millimeter to 20 millimeters. The width W can be in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters; 0.2 millimeter to 1 millimeter, 0.4 millimeter to 1 millimeter, 0.4 millimeter to 1 millimeter, 0.2 millimeter to 0.8 millimeter, or 0.2 millimeter to 0.6 millimeter. In certain embodiments, the thickness T of the first material 32 is the largest extent of the first material 32 in a direction perpendicular to the portion of the surface 22, and can be in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 1 millimeter, 0.4 millimeter to 1 millimeter, 0.4 millimeter to 1 millimeter, 0.2 millimeter to 0.8 millimeter, or 0.2 millimeter to 0.6 millimeter.


In certain embodiments, the at least one second material 42 of the at least one layer 40 is selected to generate x-rays having a predetermined energy spectrum (e.g., x-ray intensity distribution as function of x-ray energy) upon irradiation by electrons having energies in the energy range of 0.5 keV to 160 keV. Examples of the at least one second material 42 include but are not limited to, at least one of: tungsten, chromium, copper, aluminum, rhodium, molybdenum, gold, platinum, iridium, cobalt, tantalum, titanium, rhenium, silicon carbide, tantalum carbide, titanium carbide, boron carbide, and alloys or combinations including one or more thereof. In certain embodiments, the thickness t of the second material 42 is the largest extent of the second material 42 in the direction 38 perpendicular to the portion of the surface 22, and can be in a range of 2 microns to 50 microns, 2 microns to 20 microns, 2 microns to 15 microns, 4 microns to 15 microns, 2 microns to 10 microns, or 2 microns to 6 microns. In certain embodiments, the thickness t of the at least one second material 42 is substantially uniform across the whole area of the layer 40, while in certain other embodiments, the thickness t of the at least one second material 42 varies across the area of the layer 40 (e.g., a first end of the layer 40 has a first thickness of the at least one second material 42 and a second end of the layer 40 has a second thickness of the at least one second material 42, the second thickness larger than the first thickness).


In certain embodiments, the thickness t of the at least one second material 42 is selected as a function of the kinetic energy of the at least one electron beam irradiating the at least one structure 30. The electron penetration depth of electrons within a material is dependent on the material and the kinetic energy of the electrons, and in certain embodiments, the thickness t of the at least one second material 42 can be selected to be less than the electron penetration depth of the electrons in the at least one second material 42. For example, the continuous slowing down approximation (CSDA) can provide an estimate of the electron penetration depth for the electrons of a selected kinetic energy incident on the at least one second material 42, and the thickness t of the at least one second material 42 can be selected to be in a range of 50% to 70% of the CSDA estimate.


The at least one second material 42 in certain embodiments is configured to be in electrical communication with an electrical potential (e.g., electrical ground) and is configured to prevent charging of the at least one second material 42 due to electron irradiation. For example, electrically conductive soldering or brazing material (not shown in FIGS. 1A-1C) can be used to adhere (e.g., join; fix; braze; solder) the structure 30 to the surface 22, and at least some of this soldering or brazing material can extend from the surface 22 to the at least one second material 42 along at least a portion of one of the sides of the first material 32, thereby providing electrical conductivity between the at least one second material 42 and the surface 22.


In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by FIG. 1B, the at least one layer 40 further comprises at least one third material 44 between the first material 32 and the at least one second material 42, and the at least one third material 44 is different from the first material 32 and the at least one second material 42. Examples of the at least one third material 44 include but are not limited to, at least one of: titanium nitride (e.g., used with a first material 32 comprising diamond and a second material 42 comprising tungsten), iridium (e.g., used with a first material 32 comprising diamond and a second material 42 comprising molybdenum and/or tungsten), chromium (e.g., used with a first material 32 comprising diamond and a second material 42 comprising copper), beryllium (e.g., used with a first material 32 comprising diamond), and hafnium oxide. In certain embodiments, the thickness of the third material 44 is the largest extent of the second material 44 in the direction perpendicular to the portion of the surface 22, and can be in a range of 2 nanometers to 50 nanometers (e.g., 2 nanometers to 30 nanometers). In certain embodiments, the at least one third material 44 is selected to provide a diffusion barrier layer configured to avoid (e.g., prevent; reduce; inhibit) diffusion of the at least one second material 42 (e.g., tungsten) into the first material 32 (e.g., diamond). For example, a diffusion barrier layer can be graded from a carbide material at an interface with the diamond first material 32 to the at least one third material 44. In certain embodiments, the at least one third material 44 is configured to enhance (e.g., improve; facilitate) adhesion between the at least one second material 42 and the first material 32 and/or to enhance (e.g., improve; facilitate) thermal conductivity between the at least one second material 42 and the first material 32.


In certain embodiments, the length L and the width W of the first material 32 can be selected to be sufficiently small to avoid (e.g., prevent; reduce; inhibit) interfacial stress between the dissimilar first material 32 and the at least one second material 42, between the dissimilar first material 32 and the at least one third material 44, and/or between the dissimilar at least one second material 42 and the at least one third material 44. For example, each of the length L and the width W of the first material 32 can be less than 2 millimeters.


In certain embodiments, the first material 32 (e.g., diamond) can be cut (e.g., laser-cut) from a wafer or other structure (e.g., in strips). While FIGS. 1A-1C schematically illustrate certain embodiments in which the first material 32 has straight and smooth top, bottom, and side surfaces at perpendicular angles relative to one another, in certain other embodiments, the top, bottom, and/or side surfaces of the first material 32 are rough, irregular, or curved and/or are at non-perpendicular angles relative to one another. In certain embodiments, the at least one second material 42 and/or the at least one third material 44 can be deposited onto a top surface of the first material 32 (e.g., by a sputtering process such as magnetron sputtering). While FIGS. 1A-1C schematically illustrate certain embodiments in which the at least one second material 42 and the at least one third material 44 have straight and smooth top, bottom, and side surfaces and side surfaces which are flush with the sides of the first material 32, in certain other embodiments, the at least one second material 42 and/or the at least one third material 44 are rough, irregular, or curved surfaces, and/or the side surfaces extend beyond the top surface of the first material 32 (e.g., extending downward along the sides of the first material 32 below the top surface of the first material 32) and/or beyond one or more of the side surfaces of the first material 32 (e.g., extending outward in one or more directions parallel to the portion of the surface 22 such that the at least one second material 42 and/or the at least one third material 44 has a larger length and/or width than does the first material 32). While FIGS. 1A-1C schematically illustrate certain embodiments in which the top surface of the at least one second material 42 are parallel to the portion of the surface 22, in certain other embodiments, the top surface of the at least one second material 42 is non-parallel to the portion of the surface 22.



FIGS. 2A and 2B schematically illustrate portions of example x-ray targets 10 having a plurality of structures 30 separate from one another in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. In FIG. 2A, the target 10 comprises three structures 30a, 30b, 30c separated from one another and arranged in a linear configuration, each of which comprises a corresponding first material 32a, 32b, 32c, at least one corresponding layer 40a, 40b, 40c over the corresponding first material 32a, 32b, 32c and comprising at least one corresponding second material 42a, 42b, 42c different from the corresponding first material 32a, 32b, 32c. In FIG. 2B, the target 10 comprises twelve structures 30 separated from one another and arranged in a rectilinear array configuration, each of which comprises a corresponding first material 32, at least one corresponding layer 40 over the corresponding first material 32 and comprising at least one corresponding second material 42 different from the corresponding first material 32. Other numbers of structures 30 (e.g., 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or more) are also compatible with certain embodiments described herein.


In certain embodiments, the first materials 32 of two or more of the structures 30 can be the same as one another (e.g., all the first materials 32 the same as one another), the first materials 32 of two or more of the structures 30 can be different from one another, the second materials 42 of two or more of the structures 30 can be the same as one another, and/or the second materials 42 of two or more of the structures 30 can be different from one another (e.g., all the second materials 42 different from one another). The x-rays generated by at least two of the structures 30 can have spectra (e.g., intensity distributions as functions of x-ray energy) that are different from one another (e.g., all the spectra from the different structures 30 can be different from one another). In certain embodiments, some or all of the structures 30 can comprise at least one third material 44 between the first material 32 and the second material 42, and the third materials 44 of two or more of the structures 30 can be the same as one another and/or the third materials 44 of two or more of the structures 30 can be different from one another.


In certain embodiments, each of the structures 30 has a corresponding long dimension (e.g., length La, Lb, Lc) along a first direction 34a, 34b, 34c parallel to the portion of the surface 22 and a corresponding short dimension (e.g., width Wa, Wb, Wc) along a second direction 36a, 36b, 36c perpendicular to the first direction 34a, 34b, 34c and parallel to the portion of the surface 22. The long dimensions of two or more of the structures 30 can be equal to one another (e.g., all the long dimensions equal to one another), the long dimensions of two or more of the structures 30 can be non-equal to one another, the short dimensions of two or more of the structures 30 can be equal to one another (e.g., all the short dimensions equal to one another), and/or the short dimensions of two or more of the structures can be non-equal to one another. In certain embodiments, each of the layers 40 has a corresponding thickness (e.g., ta, tb, tc) in a direction 38 perpendicular to the portion of the surface 22. The thicknesses of two or more of the structures 30 can be equal to one another (e.g., all the thicknesses equal to one another) and/or the thicknesses of two or more of the structures 30 can be non-equal to one another (e.g., all the thicknesses non-equal to one another). Adjacent structures 30 of certain embodiments are spaced from one another by separation distances in a direction parallel to the portion of the surface 22, and the separation distances are in a range greater than 0.02 millimeter, 0.02 millimeter to 4 millimeters, 0.2 millimeter to 4 millimeters, 0.4 millimeter to 2 millimeters, 0.4 millimeter to 1 millimeter, or 1 millimeter to 4 millimeters. The separation distance between a first two adjacent structures 30 and the separation distance between a second two adjacent structures 30 can be equal to one another or non-equal to one another.


As schematically illustrated in FIG. 2A, the example structures 30 are arranged in a linear configuration, with the structures 30 aligned with one another (e.g., having their long dimensions along first directions 34a, 34b, 34c that are parallel to one another and their short dimensions along second directions 36a, 36b, 36c parallel to and/or coincident with one another). In certain other embodiments, the structures 30 are not aligned with one another (e.g., having their long dimensions along first directions 34a, 34b, 34c that are non-parallel to one another and/or their short dimensions along second directions 36a, 36b, 36c non-parallel to and/or non-coincident with one another). As schematically illustrated in FIG. 2B, the example structures 30 are arranged in a rectilinear array configuration, with a first set of structures 30 aligned with one another (e.g., having their long dimensions along first directions 34 that are parallel to one another and their short dimensions along second directions 36 parallel and/or coincident with one another) and a second set of structures 30 aligned with one another and with the first set of structures 30 (e.g., having their long dimensions along first directions 34 parallel to and/or coincident with the long dimensions of the first set of structures 30). In certain other embodiments, the structures 30 of the array are not aligned with one another (e.g., non-parallel to and/or non-coincident long dimensions and/or short dimensions). Various other arrangements of the arrays of structures 30 are also compatible with certain embodiments described herein (e.g., non-rectilinear; non-aligned; non-equal separation distances; etc.). For example, a first set of the structures 30 can have a first periodicity and a second set of the structures 30 can have a second periodicity different from the first periodicity (e.g., different in one or two directions parallel to the portion of the surface 22). For another example, one or both of the first set and the second set can be non-periodic (e.g., in one or two directions parallel to the portion of the surface 22).



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an example x-ray source 100 of an example x-ray system 200 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The x-ray source 100 comprises an x-ray target 10 as described herein and an electron source 50 configured to generate electrons in at least one electron beam 52 and to direct the at least one electron beam 52 to impinge the at least one structure 30 of the x-ray target 10 in an electron beam spot 54 having a spot size. The electron source 50 can comprise an electron emitter having a dispenser cathode (e.g., comprising tungsten or lanthanum hexaboride) configured to emit electrons (e.g., via thermionic or field emission) to be directed to impinge the at least one structure 30. The dispenser cathode of certain embodiments has an aspect ratio equal to an aspect ratio of the electron beam spot 54 impinging the at least one structure 30. Example dispenser cathodes in accordance with certain embodiments described herein are marketed by Spectra-Mat, Inc. of Watsonville, Calif. (e.g., thermionic emitters comprising a porous tungsten matrix impregnated with barium aluminate).


The electron source 50 further comprises electron optics components (e.g., deflection electrodes; grids; etc.) configured to receive the electrons emitted from the electron emitter, to accelerate the electrons to a predetermined electron kinetic energy (e.g., in a range of 0.5 keV to 160 keV), to form (e.g., shape and/or focus) the at least one electron beam 52, and to direct the at least one electron beam 52 onto the target 10. Example configurations of electron optics components in accordance with certain embodiments described herein include but are not limited to, two-grid configurations and three-grid configurations. In certain embodiments, the x-ray target 10 is configured to be used as an anode (e.g., set at a positive voltage relative to the electron source 50) to accelerate and/or otherwise modify the electron beam 52.


In certain embodiments, the kinetic energy of the at least one electron beam 52 is selected such that the electron penetration depth of the electrons of the at least one electron beam 52 within the at least one second material 42 is greater than the thickness t of the at least one second material 42. For example, the kinetic energy of the at least one electron beam 52 can be selected to correspond to a CSDA estimate of the electron penetration depth that is greater than the thickness t of the at least one second material 42 (e.g., a CSDA estimate of the electron penetration depth that is in a range of 1.5× to 2× of the thickness t of the at least one second material 42).


In certain embodiments, the electron source 50 is positioned relative to the x-ray source 10 such that a center of the at least one electron beam 52 impinges the at least one structure 30 at a non-zero angle θ (e.g., impact angle) relative to the direction 38 perpendicular to the portion of the surface 22 or to the at least one layer 40 of the structure 30 greater than 20 degrees (e.g., in a range of 20 degrees to 50 degrees; in a range of 30 degrees to 60 degrees; in a range of 40 degrees to 70 degrees). The center line 56 of the at least one electron beam 52 can be in a plane defined by the direction 38 and the first direction 34, in a plane defined by the direction 38 and the second direction 36, or in another plane substantially perpendicular to the portion of the surface 22. The at least one electron beam 52 can have a rectangular-type beam profile, an oval-type beam profile, or another type of beam profile.


In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated in FIG. 3, the at least one electron beam 52 is focused onto the at least one layer 40 of the at least one structure 30 such that the electron beam spot 54 has a full-width-at-half maximum spot size (e.g., width of the region of the electron beam spot 54 at which the at least one electron beam 52 has an intensity of at least one-half of the maximum intensity of the at least one electron beam 52) on the at least one structure 30 that is smaller than the smallest dimension of the layer 40 in a direction parallel to the portion of the surface 22. For example, the full-width-at-half maximum spot size of the electron beam spot 54 on the at least one structure 30 can have a maximum width in a direction parallel to the portion of the surface 22 of 100 microns or less, 75 microns or less, 50 microns or less, 30 microns or less, or 15 microns or less. In certain embodiments, the full-width-at-half maximum spot size has a first dimension in a direction parallel to the portion of the surface 22 (e.g., in the first direction 34) in a range of 5 microns to 20 microns and a second dimension in another direction (e.g., in the second direction 36) perpendicular to the direction and parallel to the portion of the surface 22 in a range of 20 microns to 200 microns (e.g., the second dimension is in a range of 4× to 10× of the first dimension; the electron beam spot 54 having an aspect ratio in a range of 4:1 to 10:1).


In certain embodiments, an x-ray system 200 comprises the x-ray source 100 as described herein and at least one x-ray optic 60 configured to receive x-rays 62 from the x-ray source 100 propagating along a propagation direction having a take-off angle ψ (e.g., angle of a center line 64 of an acceptance cone of the at least one x-ray optic 60, the angle defined relative to a direction parallel to the portion of the surface 22) in a range of 0 degrees to 40 degrees (e.g., in a range of 0 degrees to 3 degrees; in a range of 2 degrees to 5 degrees; in a range of 4 degrees to 6 degrees; in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees). For example, the at least one x-ray optic 60 can be configured to receive x-rays 62 emitted from the x-ray source 100 (e.g., through a window substantially transparent to the x-rays 62) and the take-off angle ψ can be in a plane perpendicular to the plane defined by the center line 56 of the electron beam 52 and the direction 38. In certain embodiments, the take-off angle ψ is selected such that the electron beam spot 54, when viewed along the center line 64 at the take-off angle ψ, is foreshortened (e.g., to appear to be substantially symmetric; to appear to have an aspect ratio of 1:1). For example, the focal spot from which x-rays 62 are collected by the at least one x-ray optic 60 can have a full-width-at-half maximum focal spot size (e.g., width of the region of the focal spot at which the x-rays 62 have an intensity of at least one-half of the maximum intensity of the x-rays 62) that is less than 20 microns, less than 15 microns, or less than 10 microns.


Various configurations of the at least one x-ray optic 60 and the x-ray system 200 are compatible with certain embodiments described herein. For example, the at least one x-ray optic 60 can comprise at least one of a polycapillary-type or single capillary-type optic, with an inner reflecting surface having a shape of one or more portions of a quadric function (e.g., portion of an ellipsoid and/or portions of mirrored paraboloids facing one another). The x-ray system 200 can comprise multiple x-ray optics 60, each optimized for efficiency for a specific x-ray energy of interest, and can be configured to selectively receive x-rays 62 from the x-ray target 10 (e.g., each x-ray optic 60 paired with a corresponding structure 30 of the x-ray target 10). Various example x-ray optics 60 and x-ray systems 200 with which the x-ray source 100 disclosed herein can be used in accordance with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,570,265, 9,823,203, 10,295,486, and 10,295,485, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.



FIGS. 4A and 4B schematically illustrate other examples of an x-ray source 300 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The x-ray source 300 comprises an x-ray target 10 comprising a thermally conductive substrate 20 comprising a surface 22 and at least one structure 30 on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface 22 of the substrate 20 (see, e.g., FIGS. 1A-1C and 2A-2B). The x-ray source 300 further comprises an electron source 50 (see, e.g., FIG. 3) and a housing 310 containing a region 312 under vacuum (e.g., having a gas pressure less than 1 Torr) and sealed from the atmosphere surrounding the housing 310. The region 312 contains the at least one structure 30 and the at least one electron beam 52 from the electron source 50 is configured to propagate through a portion of the region 312 and impinge a selected one of the at least one structure 30.


In certain embodiments, the at least one structure 30 comprises a plurality of structures 30 separate from one another (see, e.g., FIGS. 2A-2B) and at least one of the target 10 and the at least one electron beam 52 is configured to be controllably moved to impinge a selected one of the plurality of structures 30 with the at least one electron beam 52 while the plurality of structures 30 remain in the sealed region 312. As described herein with regard to FIGS. 2A-2B, the second materials 42 of two or more of the structures 30 can be different from one another (e.g., all the second materials 42 different from one another) such that the x-rays generated by at least two of the structures 30 can have spectra that are different from one another (e.g., all the spectra can be different from one another), thereby advantageously providing an ability to select among different x-ray spectra. In addition, as described herein with regard to FIGS. 2A-2B, the second materials 42 of two or more of the structures 30 can be the same as one another, thereby advantageously providing a redundancy (e.g., in the event that one of the structures 30 is damaged or degraded, another one of the structures 30 can be used instead). While FIGS. 4A and 4B schematically illustrate the structures 30 oriented with their long dimensions along the first directions 34a, 34b, 34c perpendicular to the direction towards the at least one x-ray optic 60, one or more (e.g., all) of the structures 30 can alternatively have any other orientation relative to the direction towards the at least one x-ray optic 60 (e.g., in a plane defined by the direction towards the at least one x-ray optic 60 and the direction of trajectory of the at least one electron beam 52). The at least one electron beam 52 can impinge the structures 30 in a direction perpendicular to the surface 22 or to the at least one layer 40 of the structure 30 (e.g., an impact angle of 0 degrees), as schematically illustrated in FIG. 4A, or in a direction at a non-zero impact angle θ (e.g., in a range of 10 degrees to 80 degrees; in a range of 10 degrees to 30 degrees; in a range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees; in a range of 30 degrees to 50 degrees; in a range of 40 degrees to 60 degrees; in a range of 50 degrees to 70 degrees; in a range of 60 degrees to 80 degrees; in a range greater than 70 degrees) relative to a direction perpendicular to the surface 22 or to the at least one layer 40 of the structure 30.


As schematically illustrated in FIG. 4A, the electron source 50 is configured to selectively direct (e.g., deflect) the at least one electron beam 52 along a selected trajectory to impinge a selected one of the plurality of structures 30 (e.g., utilizing electron optics components, such as deflection electrodes). As shown in FIG. 4A, the x-ray target 10 can be oriented such that the at least one electron beam 52 impinges the structures 30 in a direction perpendicular to the surface 22 or to the at least one layer 40 of the structure 30. In FIG. 4A, the movement of the at least one electron beam 52 is schematically indicated by the double-headed arrow and each of the trajectories of the at least one electron beam 52 corresponding to the at least one electron beam 52 impinging a selected one of the plurality of structures 30 is schematically indicated by a corresponding center line 56a, 56b, 56c, 56d of the at least one electron beam 52. The x-rays 62 emitted from the irradiated structure 30 and transmitted through an x-ray transparent window 314 of the housing 310 are collected by the at least one x-ray optic 60. In FIG. 4A, each of the trajectories of the collected x-rays 62 corresponding to the at least one electron beam 52 impinging a selected one of the plurality of structures 30 is schematically indicated by a corresponding center line 64a, 64b, 64c, 64d of the x-rays 62. In certain embodiments, the position and/or orientation of the at least one x-ray optic 60 can be adjusted to account for the focal spot of the x-rays 62 being at different positions.


As schematically illustrated in FIG. 4B, the x-ray source 300 further comprises a stage 320 configured to move the x-ray target 10 relative to the electron source 50 such that a selected one of the plurality of structures 30 is impinged by the at least one electron beam 52. As shown in FIG. 4B, the x-ray target 10 can be oriented such that the at least one electron beam 52 impinges the structures 30 at a non-zero impact angle θ relative to a direction perpendicular to the surface 22 or to the at least one layer 40 of the structure 30. In FIG. 4B, a translation of the target 10 by the stage 320 along a direction parallel to the surface 22 of the substrate 20 is schematically indicated by the double-headed arrow. The stage 320 of certain embodiments can translate the structures 30 in one direction, in two directions (e.g., perpendicular to one another), in three directions (e.g., three directions perpendicular to one another), and/or can rotate the x-ray target 10 about one or more axes of rotation (e.g., two or more axes perpendicular to one another). In certain embodiments, one or more of the directions of translation of the target 10 by the stage 320 can be in a direction perpendicular to the at least one electron beam 42. In certain embodiments, the stage 320 comprises components (e.g., actuators; sensors) that are within the region 312 other components (e.g., computer controller; feedthroughs; motor) that are at least partially outside the region 312. The stage 320 has a sufficient amount of movement to place each of the structures 30 in position to be impinged by the at least one electron beam 52.


The x-rays 62 emitted from the irradiated structure 30 and transmitted through an x-ray transparent window 314 of the housing 310 are collected by the at least one x-ray optic 60. In certain embodiments, the position of the source of the x-rays 62 remains unchanged when selecting among the different structures 30, thereby advantageously avoiding adjustments of the position and/or orientation of the at least one x-ray optic 60 to account for different positions of the x-ray focal spot. In certain embodiments, a combination of the selectively directed electron beam 52 and the selectively movable stage 320 can be used.


While conventional sealed-tube x-ray sources typically provide focal spot sizes of about 1 millimeter and low brightness, certain embodiments described herein can provide an x-ray source that has a much smaller focal spot size and much higher brightness. Certain embodiments described herein utilize at least one electron beam 52 focused and incident onto the structure 30 with a spot size (e.g., full-width-at-half-maximum diameter) in a range of 0.5 μm to 100 μm (e.g., 2 μm; 5 μm; 10 μm; 20 μm; 50 μm), a total power in a range of 5 W to 1 kW (e.g., 10 W; 30-80 W; 100 W; 200 W), and a power density in a range of 0.2 W/μm2 to 100 W/μm2 (e.g., 0.3-0.8 W/μm2; 2.5 W/μm2; 8 W/μm2; 40 W/μm2) and the x-ray brightness (e.g., proportional to the electron beam power density) is in a range of 0.5×1010 photons/mm2/mrad2 to 5×1012 photons/mm2/mrad2 (e.g., 1-3×1010 photons/mm2 photons/mm2; 1×1011 photons/mm2/mrad2; 3×1011 photons/mm2/mrad2; 2×1012 photons/mm2/mrad2).


In addition, by having multiple structures 30 that are selectively impinged by the at least one electron beam 52, certain embodiments described herein can provide such small focal spot sizes and higher brightnesses with the flexibility to select an x-ray spectrum from a plurality of x-ray spectra by computer-controlled movement of the at least one electron beam 52 and/or the x-ray target 10 while remaining under vacuum (e.g., without having to break vacuum, replace one x-ray target with another, and pump down to return to vacuum conditions). By moving the x-ray target 10 with 1 micron or sub-micron accuracy, certain embodiments advantageously avoid re-alignment of the at least one x-ray optic 60 and/or other components of the x-ray system 200.


By providing multiple selectable x-ray spectra, certain embodiments described herein can advantageously be used in various types of x-ray instrumentation that utilize a microfocus x-ray spot, including but not limited to: x-ray microscopy, x-ray fluorescence (XRF), x-ray diffraction (XRD), x-ray tomography; x-ray scattering (e.g., SAXS; WAXS); x-ray absorption spectroscopy (e.g., XANES; EXAFS), and x-ray emission spectroscopy.



FIG. 5A schematically illustrates an example x-ray target 10 with discrete structures 30 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein, and FIGS. 5B-5I schematically illustrate various simulation results of the brightness from various versions of the example x-ray target 10 of FIG. 5A in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. Each structure 30 has a metal layer 40 (e.g., tungsten; copper) on a first material 32 of diamond at least partially embedded in a copper substrate 20. FIGS. 5B-5I compare these simulation results of the brightness with those corresponding to an example conventional x-ray target having a continuous thin metal film (e.g., tungsten; copper) deposited onto a continuous diamond layer on a copper substrate. The brightness in FIGS. 5B-5I is defined as the number of photons emitted per unit area and unit solid angle per incident electron (e.g., photons/electron/μm2/steradian).


For the simulations of FIGS. 5B, 5C, 5E, 5F, 5G, and 5I, each structure 30 has a width of 1 μm and the structures 30 are spaced from one another (e.g., between adjacent edges) by 2 μm (e.g., having a pitch of 3 μm and a duty cycle of 1:2), as shown in FIG. 5A. For the simulations of FIGS. 5D and 5H, each structure 30 has a width of 1 μm and the structures 30 are spaced from one another (e.g., between adjacent edges) by 1 μm (e.g., having a pitch of 2 μm and a duty cycle of 1:1). According to thermal modeling calculations, the x-ray target 10 of FIG. 5A can withstand an electron power density that is four times higher than on a solid copper anode for the same maximum temperature (e.g., 65 W versus 12.5 W). In the simulation results of FIGS. 5B-5I, to account for the larger fraction of scatter electrons at higher impact angles, the power of the electron beam 52 at an impact angle of 60 degrees was increased by 1.3 times as compared to an impact angle of 0 degrees.



FIG. 5B compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 25 kV electron beam and emitted from (i) a conventional tungsten target and (ii) an example target 10 with structures 30 with a tungsten layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:2. On the left side of FIG. 5B, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 8-10 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5B, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-25 keV is shown.



FIG. 5C compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 35 kV electron beam and emitted from (i) a conventional tungsten target and (ii) an example target 10 with structures 30 with a tungsten layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:2. On the left side of FIG. 5C, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 8-10 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5C, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-35 keV is shown.



FIG. 5D shows the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 35 kV electron beam and emitted from an example target 10 with structures 30 with a tungsten layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:1. On the left side of FIG. 5D, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 8-10 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5C, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-35 keV is shown.



FIG. 5E compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 50 kV electron beam and emitted from (i) a conventional tungsten target and (ii) an example target 10 with structures 30 with a tungsten layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:2. On the left side of FIG. 5E, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 8-10 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5E, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-50 keV is shown.



FIG. 5F compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 25 kV electron beam and emitted from (i) a conventional copper target and (ii) an example target 10 with structures 30 with a copper layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:2. On the left side of FIG. 5F, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 7-9 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5E, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-25 keV is shown.



FIG. 5G compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 35 kV electron beam and emitted from (i) a conventional copper target and (ii) an example target 10 with structures 30 with a copper layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:2. On the left side of FIG. 5G, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 7-9 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5G, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-35 keV is shown.



FIG. 5H compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 35 kV electron beam and emitted from an example target 10 with structures 30 with a copper layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:1. On the left side of FIG. 5H, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 7-9 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5H, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-35 keV is shown.



FIG. 5I compares the brightness of x-rays as a function of take-off angle and for three impact angles (0, 30, and 60 degrees) generated by a 50 kV electron beam and emitted from (i) a conventional copper target and (ii) an example target 10 with structures 30 with a copper layer 40 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein with a duty cycle of 1:2. On the left side of FIG. 5I, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 7-9 keV is shown and on the right side of FIG. 5I, the brightness for x-rays having energies of 3-50 keV is shown.


As shown by these simulation results, the example targets 10 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein exhibit higher brightnesses than do conventional targets. For a tungsten layer with an impact angle of 60 degrees and a take-off angle of 5 degrees and for the three electron beam energies (25 kV, 35 kV, 50 kV), Table 1A shows the brightnesses (photons/electron/m2/steradian) of x-rays having energies 8-10 keV and Table 1B shows the brightnesses photons/electron/m2/steradian) of x-rays having energies greater than 3 keV. These results were made assuming that the example target 10 exhibits four times the heat dissipation than the conventional target and with a correction of 1.3 times to account for higher electron scattering at the incident angle of 60 degrees as compared to 0 degrees.












TABLE 1A





Electron
Brightness from
Brightness from
Brightness


Energy
Conventional target
Example target 10
Ratio







25 kV
1.26E−07
3.64E−07
2.90


35 kV
2.28E−07
8.02E−07
3.52


50 kV
3.32E−07
1.42E−06
4.27



















TABLE 1B





Electron
Brightness from
Brightness from
Brightness


Energy
Conventional target
Example target 10
Ratio







25 kV
3.85E−07
8.86E−07
2.30


35 kV
6.12E−07
1.58E−06
2.59


50 kV
8.98E−07
2.66E−06
2.96









For a copper layer with an impact angle of 60 degrees and a take-off angle of 5 degrees and for the three electron beam energies (25 kV, 35 kV, 50 kV), Table 2A shows the brightnesses (photons/electron/m2/steradian) of x-rays having energies 7-9 keV and Table 2B shows the brightnesses photons/electron/m2/steradian) of x-rays having energies greater than 3 keV. These results were made assuming that the example target 10 exhibits four times the heat dissipation than the conventional target and with a correction of 1.3 times to account for higher electron scattering at the incident angle of 60 degrees as compared to 0 degrees.












TABLE 2A





Electron
Brightness from
Brightness from
Brightness


Energy
Conventional target
Example target 10
Ratio







25 kV
1.85E−07
4.55E−07
2.46


35 kV
2.96E−07
8.56E−07
2.89


50 kV
4.69E−07
1.41E−06
3.00



















TABLE 2B





Electron
Brightness from
Brightness from
Brightness


Energy
Conventional target
Example target 10
Ratio







25 kV
3.67E−07
8.52E−07
2.32


35 kV
5.64E−07
1.43E−06
2.53


50 kV
8.32E−07
2.26E−06
2.71









Various configurations have been described above. Although this invention has been described with reference to these specific configurations, the descriptions are intended to be illustrative of the invention and are not intended to be limiting. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, for example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations making up the method/process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. Features or elements from various embodiments and examples discussed above may be combined with one another to produce alternative configurations compatible with embodiments disclosed herein. Various aspects and advantages of the embodiments have been described where appropriate. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such aspects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, it should be recognized that the various embodiments may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.

Claims
  • 1. An x-ray target comprising: a thermally conductive substrate comprising a surface; anda plurality of structures separate from one another and on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface, each of at least two structures of the plurality of structures comprising: a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate; andat least one layer over the first material, the at least one layer comprising at least one second material different from the first material, the at least one second material configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons, the first materials of the at least two structures separate from one another and the at least one layers of the at least two structures separate from one another.
  • 2. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein the first material of each of the at least two structures extends along a direction parallel to the portion of the surface by a distance in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters.
  • 3. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein the first material of each of the at least two structures extends along a direction parallel to the portion of the surface by a distance in a range of 1 millimeter to 20 millimeters.
  • 4. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein separations of adjacent structures of the plurality of structures are in a range of 1 millimeter to 4 millimeters.
  • 5. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein a separation along a direction parallel to the surface between adjacent edges of a first two adjacent structures of the plurality of structures is non-equal to a separation along the direction parallel to the surface between adjacent edges of a second two adjacent structures of the plurality of structures.
  • 6. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein the first material comprises diamond and/or silicon carbide.
  • 7. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein the at least one layer has a thickness in a range of 1 micron to 20 microns.
  • 8. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein the first materials of the at least two structures are the same as one another and the at least one second materials of the at least two structures are different from one another.
  • 9. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein a first structure of the at least two structures is configured to generate x-rays having a first energy spectrum and a second structure of the at least two structures is configured to generate x-rays having a second energy spectrum, the second energy spectrum different from the first energy spectrum.
  • 10. The x-ray target of claim 1, wherein the at least one second material comprises at least one of: tungsten, chromium, copper, aluminum, rhodium, molybdenum, gold, platinum, iridium, cobalt, tantalum, titanium, rhenium, silicon carbide, tantalum carbide, titanium carbide, boron carbide, and alloys or combinations including one or more thereof.
  • 11. An x-ray source comprising: an x-ray target comprising: a thermally conductive substrate comprising a surface; anda plurality of structures separate from one another and on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface, each of at least two structures of the plurality of structures comprising: a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate; andat least one layer over the first material, the at least one layer comprising at least one second material different from the first material, the first materials of the at least two structures separate from one another and the at least one layers of the at least two structures separate from one another; andan electron source configured to generate electrons in at least one electron beam and to direct the at least one electron beam to impinge the at least one structure.
  • 12. The x-ray source of claim 11, wherein a largest extent of the first material of each of the at least two structures along a direction parallel to the portion of the surface is in a range of 0.2 millimeter to 3 millimeters and/or in a range of 1 millimeter to 20 millimeters.
  • 13. The x-ray source of claim 11, wherein the at least one second material has a thickness less than an electron penetration depth of the electrons in the at least one second material.
  • 14. The x-ray source of claim 11, wherein the at least one electron beam has an electron beam spot on the plurality of structures, the electron beam spot having a first dimension in a first direction parallel to the portion of the surface in a range of 5 microns to 20 microns and a second dimension in a second direction parallel to the portion of the surface and perpendicular to the first direction in a range of 20 microns to 200 microns.
  • 15. The x-ray source of claim 11, wherein the at least one electron beam has an electron beam spot on the plurality of structures, the electron beam spot having an aspect ratio in a range of 4:1 to 10:1.
  • 16. The x-ray source of claim 11, wherein the at least one electron beam impinges the plurality of structures such that a center line of the at least one electron beam is at a non-zero angle relative to a direction perpendicular to the portion of the surface.
  • 17. The x-ray source of claim 11, wherein at least one of the x-ray target and the at least one electron beam is configured to be controllably moved such that the at least one electron beam impinges a selected one of the plurality of structures.
  • 18. A method comprising: impinging a first selected structure of a plurality of structures with at least one electron beam, the plurality of structures separate from one another and on or embedded in at least a portion of a surface of a thermally conductive substrate, each of at least two structures of the plurality of structures comprising: a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate; andat least one layer over the first material, the at least one layer comprising at least one second material different from the first material, the at least one second material configured to generate x-rays in response to being impinged by the at least one electron beam;controllably moving the substrate and/or the at least one electron beam relative to one another; andimpinging a second selected structure of the plurality of structures with the at least one electron beam.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the x-rays generated in response to said impinging the first selected structure have a first energy spectrum and the x-rays generated in response to said impinging the second selected structure have a second energy spectrum that is different from the first energy spectrum.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the plurality of structures are within a sealed region and said controllably moving the at least one of the substrate and the at least one electron beam occurs while the plurality of structures remain within the sealed region.
  • 21. The method of claim 18, wherein said controllably moving the substrate and/or the at least one electron beam relative to one another comprises moving the substrate along a direction parallel to the surface.
  • 22. An x-ray target comprising: a thermally conductive substrate comprising a surface;a first structure on or embedded in at least a portion of the surface, the first structure comprising: a thermally conductive first material in thermal communication with the substrate; andat least one first layer over the first material, the at least one first layer comprising at least one second material different from the first material, the at least one second material configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons; anda second structure on or embedded in at least a second portion of the surface, the second structure separate from the first structure, the second structure comprising: a thermally conductive third material in thermal communication with the substrate, the third material separate from the first material and the at least one first layer; andat least one second layer over the third material, the at least one second layer comprising at least one fourth material different from the third material, the at least one fourth material configured to generate x-rays upon irradiation by electrons, the at least one second layer separate from the first material and the at least one first layer.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

The present application is a continuation from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/518,713 filed Jul. 22, 2019 which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 62/703,836, filed Jul. 26, 2018 which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (621)
Number Name Date Kind
1203495 Coolidge Oct 1916 A
1211092 Coolidge Jan 1917 A
1215116 Coolidge Feb 1917 A
1328495 Coolidge Jan 1920 A
1355126 Coolidge Oct 1920 A
1790073 Pohl Jan 1931 A
1917099 Coolidge Jul 1933 A
1946312 Coolidge Feb 1934 A
2926270 Zunick Feb 1960 A
3795832 Holland Mar 1974 A
4165472 Witty Aug 1979 A
4192994 Kastner Mar 1980 A
4227112 Waugh et al. Oct 1980 A
4266138 Nelson et al. May 1981 A
4426718 Hayashi Jan 1984 A
4523327 Eversole Jun 1985 A
4573186 Reinhold Feb 1986 A
4642811 Georgopoulos Feb 1987 A
4727000 Ovshinsky Feb 1988 A
4798446 Hettrick Jan 1989 A
4807268 Wittrey Feb 1989 A
4940319 Ueda et al. Jul 1990 A
4945552 Ueda Jul 1990 A
4951304 Piestrup et al. Aug 1990 A
4972449 Upadhya et al. Nov 1990 A
5001737 Lewis et al. Mar 1991 A
5008918 Lee et al. Apr 1991 A
5119408 Little Jun 1992 A
5132997 Kojima Jul 1992 A
5148462 Spitsyn et al. Sep 1992 A
5173928 Momose et al. Dec 1992 A
5204887 Hayashida et al. Apr 1993 A
5249216 Ohsugi et al. Sep 1993 A
5276724 Kumasaka et al. Jan 1994 A
5371774 Cerrina Dec 1994 A
5452142 Hall Sep 1995 A
5461657 Hayashida Oct 1995 A
5513237 Nobuta et al. Apr 1996 A
5602899 Larson Feb 1997 A
5604782 Cash, Jr. Feb 1997 A
5629969 Koshishiba May 1997 A
5657365 Yamamoto et al. Aug 1997 A
5682415 O'Hara Oct 1997 A
5715291 Momose Feb 1998 A
5729583 Tang et al. Mar 1998 A
5737387 Smither Apr 1998 A
5768339 O'Hara Jun 1998 A
5772903 Hirsch Jun 1998 A
5778039 Hossain Jul 1998 A
5799056 Gutman Aug 1998 A
5812629 Clauser Sep 1998 A
5825848 Virshup et al. Oct 1998 A
5832052 Hirose et al. Nov 1998 A
5857008 Reinhold Jan 1999 A
5878110 Yamamoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5881126 Momose Mar 1999 A
5912940 O'Hara Jun 1999 A
5930325 Momose Jul 1999 A
6108397 Cash, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6108398 Mazor et al. Aug 2000 A
6118853 Hansen et al. Sep 2000 A
6125167 Morgan Sep 2000 A
6181773 Lee et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195410 Cash, Jr. Feb 2001 B1
6226347 Golenhofen May 2001 B1
6278764 Barbee, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6307916 Rogers et al. Oct 2001 B1
6359964 Kogan Mar 2002 B1
6377660 Ukita et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381303 Vu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389100 Verman et al. May 2002 B1
6430254 Wilkins Aug 2002 B2
6430260 Snyder Aug 2002 B1
6442231 O'Hara Aug 2002 B1
6456688 Taguchi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463123 Korenev Oct 2002 B1
6487272 Kutsuzawa Nov 2002 B1
6504901 Loxley et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504902 Iwasaki et al. Jan 2003 B2
6507388 Burghoorn Jan 2003 B2
6553096 Zhou et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560313 Harding et al. May 2003 B1
6560315 Price et al. May 2003 B1
6707883 Tiearney et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711234 Loxley et al. Mar 2004 B1
6763086 Platonov Jul 2004 B2
6811612 Gruen et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815363 Yun et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829327 Chen Dec 2004 B1
6847699 Rigali et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850598 Fryda et al. Feb 2005 B1
6870172 Mankos et al. Mar 2005 B1
6885503 Yun et al. Apr 2005 B2
6891627 Levy et al. May 2005 B1
6914723 Yun et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917472 Yun et al. Jul 2005 B1
6934359 Chen Aug 2005 B2
6947522 Wilson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6975703 Wilson et al. Dec 2005 B2
7003077 Jen et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006596 Janik Feb 2006 B1
7015467 Maldonado et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023950 Annis Apr 2006 B1
7023955 Chen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7057187 Yun et al. Jun 2006 B1
7076026 Verman et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079625 Lenz Jul 2006 B2
7095822 Yun Aug 2006 B1
7103138 Pelc et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110503 Kumakhov Sep 2006 B1
7119953 Yun et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120228 Yokhin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130375 Yun et al. Oct 2006 B1
7149283 Hoheisel et al. Dec 2006 B2
7170969 Yun et al. Jan 2007 B1
7180979 Momose Feb 2007 B2
7180981 Wang Feb 2007 B2
7183547 Yun et al. Feb 2007 B2
7215736 Wang et al. May 2007 B1
7215741 Ukita et al. May 2007 B2
7218700 Huber et al. May 2007 B2
7218703 Yada et al. May 2007 B2
7221731 Yada et al. May 2007 B2
7245696 Yun et al. Jul 2007 B2
7264397 Ritter Sep 2007 B2
7268945 Yun et al. Sep 2007 B2
7286640 Yun et al. Oct 2007 B2
7297959 Yun et al. Nov 2007 B2
7298826 Inazuru Nov 2007 B2
7330533 Sampayon Feb 2008 B2
7346148 Ukita Mar 2008 B2
7346204 Ito Mar 2008 B2
7349525 Morton Mar 2008 B2
7359487 Newcome Apr 2008 B1
7365909 Yun et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365918 Yun et al. Apr 2008 B1
7382864 Hebert et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388942 Wang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394890 Wang et al. Jul 2008 B1
7400704 Yun et al. Jul 2008 B1
7406151 Yun Jul 2008 B1
7412024 Yun et al. Aug 2008 B1
7412030 O'Hara Aug 2008 B1
7412131 Lee et al. Aug 2008 B2
7414787 Yun et al. Aug 2008 B2
7433444 Baumann Oct 2008 B2
7440542 Baumann Oct 2008 B2
7443953 Yun et al. Oct 2008 B1
7443958 Harding Oct 2008 B2
7453981 Baumann Nov 2008 B2
7463712 Zhu et al. Dec 2008 B2
7474735 Spahn Jan 2009 B2
7486770 Baumann Feb 2009 B2
7492871 Popescu Feb 2009 B2
7499521 Wang et al. Mar 2009 B2
7515684 Gibson et al. Apr 2009 B2
7522698 Popescu Apr 2009 B2
7522707 Steinlage et al. Apr 2009 B2
7522708 Heismann Apr 2009 B2
7529343 Safai et al. May 2009 B2
7532704 Hempel May 2009 B2
7551719 Yokhin et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551722 Ohshima et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561662 Wang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564941 Baumann Jul 2009 B2
7583789 Macdonald et al. Sep 2009 B1
7601399 Barnola et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605371 Yasui et al. Oct 2009 B2
7639786 Baumann Dec 2009 B2
7646843 Popescu et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653177 Baumann et al. Jan 2010 B2
7672433 Zhong et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680243 Yokhin et al. Mar 2010 B2
7738629 Chen Jun 2010 B2
7787588 Yun et al. Aug 2010 B1
7796725 Yun et al. Sep 2010 B1
7796726 Gendreau et al. Sep 2010 B1
7800072 Yun et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809113 Aoki et al. Oct 2010 B2
7813475 Wu et al. Oct 2010 B1
7817777 Baumann et al. Oct 2010 B2
7848483 Platonov Dec 2010 B2
7864426 Yun et al. Jan 2011 B2
7864922 Kawabe Jan 2011 B2
7873146 Okunuki et al. Jan 2011 B2
7876883 O'Hara Jan 2011 B2
7889838 David et al. Feb 2011 B2
7889844 Okunuki et al. Feb 2011 B2
7899154 Chen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7902528 Hara et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914693 Jeong et al. Mar 2011 B2
7920673 Lanza et al. Apr 2011 B2
7920676 Yun et al. Apr 2011 B2
7924973 Kottler et al. Apr 2011 B2
7929667 Zhuang et al. Apr 2011 B1
7945018 Heismann May 2011 B2
7949092 Brons May 2011 B2
7949095 Ning May 2011 B2
7974379 Case et al. Jul 2011 B1
7983381 David et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991120 Okunuki et al. Aug 2011 B2
8005185 Popescu Aug 2011 B2
8009796 Popescu Aug 2011 B2
8009797 Ouchi Aug 2011 B2
8041004 David Oct 2011 B2
8036341 Lee Nov 2011 B2
8058621 Kommareddy Nov 2011 B2
8068579 Yun et al. Nov 2011 B1
8073099 Niu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8094784 Morton Jan 2012 B2
8139711 Takahashi Mar 2012 B2
8139716 Okunuki et al. Mar 2012 B2
8165270 David et al. Apr 2012 B2
8184771 Murakoshi May 2012 B2
8208602 Lee Jun 2012 B2
8208603 Sato Jun 2012 B2
8233587 Sato Jul 2012 B2
8243879 Itoh et al. Aug 2012 B2
8243884 Rödhammer et al. Aug 2012 B2
8249220 Verman et al. Aug 2012 B2
8280000 Takahashi Oct 2012 B2
8306183 Koehler Nov 2012 B2
8306184 Chang et al. Nov 2012 B2
8331534 Silver Dec 2012 B2
8351569 Baker Jan 2013 B2
8351570 Nakamura Jan 2013 B2
8353628 Yun et al. Jan 2013 B1
8357894 Toth et al. Jan 2013 B2
8360640 Reinhold Jan 2013 B2
8374309 Donath Feb 2013 B2
8406378 Wang et al. Mar 2013 B2
8416920 Okumura et al. Apr 2013 B2
8422633 Lantz et al. Apr 2013 B2
8423127 Mahmood et al. Apr 2013 B2
8451975 Tada May 2013 B2
8422637 Okunuki et al. Jun 2013 B2
8488743 Verman Jul 2013 B2
8509386 Lee et al. Aug 2013 B2
8520803 Behling Aug 2013 B2
8526575 Yun et al. Sep 2013 B1
8532257 Mukaide et al. Sep 2013 B2
8553843 Drory Oct 2013 B2
8559594 Ouchi Oct 2013 B2
8559597 Chen et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565371 Bredno Oct 2013 B2
8576983 Baeumer Nov 2013 B2
8588372 Zou et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591108 Tada Nov 2013 B2
8602648 Jacobsen et al. Dec 2013 B1
8632247 Ishii Jan 2014 B2
8644451 Aoki et al. Feb 2014 B2
8666024 Okunuki et al. Mar 2014 B2
8666025 Klausz Mar 2014 B2
8699667 Steinlage et al. Apr 2014 B2
8735844 Khaykovich et al. May 2014 B1
8737565 Lyon et al. May 2014 B1
8744048 Lee et al. Jun 2014 B2
8755487 Kaneko Jun 2014 B2
8767915 Stutman Jul 2014 B2
8767916 Hashimoto Jul 2014 B2
8781069 Murakoshi Jul 2014 B2
8824629 Ishii Sep 2014 B2
8831174 Kohara Sep 2014 B2
8831175 Silver et al. Sep 2014 B2
8831179 Adler et al. Sep 2014 B2
8837680 Tsujii Sep 2014 B2
8855265 Engel Oct 2014 B2
8859977 Kondoh Oct 2014 B2
8861682 Okunuki et al. Oct 2014 B2
8903042 Ishii Dec 2014 B2
8908824 Kondoh Dec 2014 B2
8972191 Stampanoni et al. Mar 2015 B2
8989351 Vogtmeier et al. Mar 2015 B2
8989474 Kido et al. Mar 2015 B2
8995622 Adler et al. Mar 2015 B2
9001967 Baturin Apr 2015 B2
9001968 Kugland et al. Apr 2015 B2
9007562 Marconi et al. Apr 2015 B2
9008278 Lee et al. Apr 2015 B2
9016943 Jacobsen et al. Apr 2015 B2
9020101 Omote et al. Apr 2015 B2
9025725 Kiyohara et al. May 2015 B2
9029795 Sando May 2015 B2
9031201 Sato May 2015 B2
9036773 David et al. May 2015 B2
9063055 Ouchi Jun 2015 B2
9086536 Pang et al. Jul 2015 B2
9129715 Adler et al. Sep 2015 B2
9222899 Yamaguchi Dec 2015 B2
9230703 Mohr et al. Jan 2016 B2
9234856 Mukaide Jan 2016 B2
9251995 Ogura Feb 2016 B2
9257254 Ogura et al. Feb 2016 B2
9263225 Morton Feb 2016 B2
9280056 Clube et al. Mar 2016 B2
9281158 Ogura Mar 2016 B2
9291578 Adler Mar 2016 B2
9329141 Stutman May 2016 B2
9336917 Ozawa et al. May 2016 B2
9357975 Baturin Jun 2016 B2
9362081 Bleuet Jun 2016 B2
9370084 Sprong et al. Jun 2016 B2
9390881 Yun et al. Jul 2016 B2
9412552 Aoki et al. Aug 2016 B2
9430832 Koehler et al. Aug 2016 B2
9439613 Stutman Sep 2016 B2
9445775 Das Sep 2016 B2
9448190 Yun et al. Sep 2016 B2
9449780 Chen Sep 2016 B2
9449781 Yun et al. Sep 2016 B2
9453803 Radicke Sep 2016 B2
9480447 Mohr et al. Nov 2016 B2
9486175 Fredenberg et al. Nov 2016 B2
9494534 Baturin Nov 2016 B2
9502204 Ikarashi Nov 2016 B2
9520260 Hesselink et al. Dec 2016 B2
9524846 Sato et al. Dec 2016 B2
9532760 Anton et al. Jan 2017 B2
9543109 Yun et al. Jan 2017 B2
9557280 Pfeiffer et al. Jan 2017 B2
9564284 Gerzoskovitz Feb 2017 B2
9570264 Ogura et al. Feb 2017 B2
9570265 Yun et al. Feb 2017 B1
9588066 Pois et al. Mar 2017 B2
9594036 Yun et al. Mar 2017 B2
9595415 Ogura Mar 2017 B2
9632040 Stutman Apr 2017 B2
9658174 Omote May 2017 B2
9700267 Baturin et al. Jul 2017 B2
9719947 Yun et al. Aug 2017 B2
9748012 Yokoyama Aug 2017 B2
9757081 Proksa Sep 2017 B2
9761021 Koehler Sep 2017 B2
9770215 Souchay et al. Sep 2017 B2
9823203 Yun et al. Nov 2017 B2
9826949 Ning Nov 2017 B2
9837178 Nagai Dec 2017 B2
9842414 Koehler Dec 2017 B2
9861330 Rossl Jan 2018 B2
9874531 Yun et al. Jan 2018 B2
9881710 Roessl Jan 2018 B2
9916655 Sampanoni Mar 2018 B2
9934930 Parker et al. Apr 2018 B2
9939392 Wen Apr 2018 B2
9970119 Yokoyama May 2018 B2
10014148 Tang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10020158 Yamada Jul 2018 B2
10028716 Rossl Jul 2018 B2
10045753 Teshima Aug 2018 B2
10068740 Gupta Sep 2018 B2
10074451 Kottler et al. Sep 2018 B2
10076297 Bauer Sep 2018 B2
10085701 Hoshino Oct 2018 B2
10105112 Utsumi Oct 2018 B2
10115557 Ishii Oct 2018 B2
10141081 Preusche Nov 2018 B2
10151713 Wu et al. Dec 2018 B2
10153061 Yokoyama Dec 2018 B2
10153062 Gall et al. Dec 2018 B2
10182194 Karim et al. Jan 2019 B2
10217596 Liang et al. Feb 2019 B2
10231687 Kahn et al. Mar 2019 B2
10247683 Yun et al. Apr 2019 B2
10256001 Yokoyama Apr 2019 B2
10264659 Miller et al. Apr 2019 B1
10267752 Zhang et al. Apr 2019 B2
10267753 Zhang et al. Apr 2019 B2
10269528 Yun et al. Apr 2019 B2
10295485 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10295486 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10297359 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10304580 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10349908 Yun et al. Jul 2019 B2
10352695 Dziura et al. Jul 2019 B2
10352880 Yun et al. Jul 2019 B2
10393683 Hegeman et al. Aug 2019 B2
10401309 Yun et al. Sep 2019 B2
10416099 Yun et al. Sep 2019 B2
10429325 Ito et al. Oct 2019 B2
10466185 Yun et al. Nov 2019 B2
10485492 Koehler et al. Nov 2019 B2
10568588 Koehler et al. Feb 2020 B2
10653376 Yun et al. May 2020 B2
10697902 Sharma et al. Jun 2020 B2
10841515 Tsujino Nov 2020 B1
20010006413 Burghoorn Jul 2001 A1
20020080916 Jiang Jun 2002 A1
20020085676 Snyder Jul 2002 A1
20030142790 Zhou et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030054133 Wadley et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030112923 Lange Jun 2003 A1
20030142781 Kawahara Jul 2003 A1
20030223536 Yun et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040047446 Platonov Mar 2004 A1
20040076260 Charles, Jr. Apr 2004 A1
20040120463 Wilson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040140432 Maldonado et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050025281 Verman et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050074094 Jen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050123097 Wang Jun 2005 A1
20050163284 Inazuru Jul 2005 A1
20050201520 Smith et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050282300 Yun et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060045234 Pelc Mar 2006 A1
20060062350 Yokhin Mar 2006 A1
20060182322 Bernhardt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060233309 Kutzner et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239405 Verman Oct 2006 A1
20070030959 Ritter Feb 2007 A1
20070071174 Hebert et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070108387 Yun et al. May 2007 A1
20070110217 Ukita May 2007 A1
20070183563 Baumann Aug 2007 A1
20070183579 Baumann et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189449 Baumann Aug 2007 A1
20070248215 Ohshima et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080084966 Aoki et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080089484 Reinhold Apr 2008 A1
20080094694 Yun et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099935 Egle May 2008 A1
20080116398 Hara May 2008 A1
20080117511 Chen May 2008 A1
20080159475 Mazor et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080159707 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165355 Yasui et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170662 Reinhold Jul 2008 A1
20080170668 Kruit et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181363 Fenter et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080240344 Reinhold Oct 2008 A1
20080273662 Yun Nov 2008 A1
20090052619 Endoh Feb 2009 A1
20090092227 David Apr 2009 A1
20090154640 Baumann et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090316857 David et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090316860 Okunuki et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100012845 Baeumer et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100027739 Lantz et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040202 Lee Feb 2010 A1
20100046702 Chen et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100061508 Takahashi Mar 2010 A1
20100091947 Niu Apr 2010 A1
20100141151 Reinhold Jun 2010 A1
20100246765 Murakoshi Sep 2010 A1
20100260315 Sato et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272239 Lantz et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284513 Kawabe Nov 2010 A1
20110026680 Sato Feb 2011 A1
20110038455 Silver et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110058655 Okumura et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064191 Toth et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064202 Thran et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110085644 Verman Apr 2011 A1
20110135066 Behling Jun 2011 A1
20110142204 Zou et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110235781 Aoki et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110243302 Murakoshi Oct 2011 A1
20110268252 Ozawa et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120041679 Stampanoni Feb 2012 A1
20120057669 Vogtmeier et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120163547 Lee et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120163554 Tada Jun 2012 A1
20120224670 Kiyohara et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120228475 Pang et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120269323 Adler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120269324 Adler Oct 2012 A1
20120269325 Adler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120269326 Adler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120294420 Nagai Nov 2012 A1
20130011040 Kido et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130032727 Kondoe Feb 2013 A1
20130039460 Levy Feb 2013 A1
20130108012 Sato May 2013 A1
20130108022 Kugland et al. May 2013 A1
20130195246 Tamura et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223594 Sprong et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130235976 Jeong et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130251100 Sasaki et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130259207 Omote et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130279651 Yokoyama Oct 2013 A1
20130308112 Clube et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130308754 Yamazaki et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140023973 Marconi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140029729 Kucharczyk Jan 2014 A1
20140037052 Adler Feb 2014 A1
20140064445 Adler Mar 2014 A1
20140072104 Jacobsen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140079188 Hesselink et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140105353 Pfeiffer et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140105363 Chen et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140146945 Fredenberg et al. May 2014 A1
20140153692 Larkin et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140177800 Sato et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140185778 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140205057 Koehler et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211919 Ogura et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226785 Stutman et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140241493 Yokoyama Aug 2014 A1
20140270060 Date et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140369469 Ogura et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140369471 Ogura Dec 2014 A1
20150030126 Radicke Jan 2015 A1
20150030127 Aoki et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150043713 Chen Feb 2015 A1
20150049860 Das Feb 2015 A1
20150051877 Bakerman et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150055743 Vedantham et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150055745 Holzner et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150071402 Handa Mar 2015 A1
20150092924 Yun et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150110252 Yun et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117599 Yun et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150194287 Yun et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150243397 Yun et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150247811 Yun et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150260663 Yun et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150323478 Stutman Nov 2015 A1
20150357069 Yun et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160064175 Yun et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160066870 Yun et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160106387 Kahn Apr 2016 A1
20160178540 Yun et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160178541 Hwang et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160206259 Auclair et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160268094 Yun et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160320320 Yun et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160351370 Yun et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170018392 Cheng Jan 2017 A1
20170047191 Yun et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170052128 Yun et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170074809 Ito Mar 2017 A1
20170162288 Yun et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170162359 Tang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170227476 Zhang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170234811 Zhang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170261442 Yun et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170336334 Yun et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180144901 Yun et al. May 2018 A1
20180182131 Koehler et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180202951 Yun et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180261352 Matsuyama et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180306734 Morimoto et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180323032 Strelec et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180344276 DeFreitas et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180348151 Kasper et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180356355 Momose et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190017942 Filevich Jan 2019 A1
20190017946 Wack et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190018824 Zarkadas Jan 2019 A1
20190019647 Lee et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190027265 Dey et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190043689 Camus Feb 2019 A1
20190057832 Durst et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190064084 Ullom et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190086342 Pois et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190088439 Honda Mar 2019 A1
20190113466 Karim et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190115184 Zalubovsky Apr 2019 A1
20190131103 Tuohimaa May 2019 A1
20190132936 Steck et al. May 2019 A1
20190154892 Moldovan May 2019 A1
20190172681 Owen et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190189385 Liang et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190204246 Hegeman et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190204757 Brussard et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190206652 Akinwande et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212281 Shchgegrov Jul 2019 A1
20190214216 Jeong et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190216416 Koehler et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190219713 Booker et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190261935 Kitamura Aug 2019 A1
20190272929 Omote et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190304735 Safai et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190311874 Tuohimma et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190317027 Tsuboi et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190331616 Schaff et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190341219 Zhang et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190341220 Parker et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190353802 Steinhauser et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190374182 Karim et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190380193 Matsuhana et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190387602 Woywode et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190391087 Matejka et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200003708 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200003712 Kataoka et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200041429 Cho et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200058462 Suzuki Feb 2020 A1
20200088656 Pois et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200090826 Adler Mar 2020 A1
20200103358 Wiell et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200105492 Behling et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200154552 Suzuki et al. May 2020 A1
20200155088 Gruener et al. May 2020 A1
20200158662 Horiba et al. May 2020 A1
20200163195 Steck et al. May 2020 A1
20200168427 Krokhmal et al. May 2020 A1
20200182806 Kappler et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200187339 Freudenberger et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200191732 Taniguchi et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200194212 Dalakos et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200203113 Ponard Jun 2020 A1
20200225172 Sato et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200225173 Sato et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200225371 Greenberg et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200232937 Yaroshenko et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200234908 Fishman et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200279351 Ratner et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200292475 Cao et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200297297 Kok et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200300789 Osakabe et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200300790 Gellineau et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200303265 Gellineau et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200305809 Schwoebel et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200319120 Kitamura et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200321184 Parker et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330059 Fredenberg et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337659 Sano et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200378904 Albarqouni et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200378905 Safai Dec 2020 A1
20200378907 Morton Dec 2020 A1
20200378908 Fujimura et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200388461 Behling et al. Dec 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (85)
Number Date Country
101257851 Sep 2008 CN
101532969 Sep 2009 CN
1015329696 Sep 2009 CN
102124537 Jul 2011 CN
102325498 Jan 2012 CN
102551761 Jul 2012 CN
0432568 Jun 1991 EP
0751533 Jan 1997 EP
1028451 Aug 2000 EP
1169713 Jan 2006 EP
3093867 Nov 2016 EP
2548447 Jan 1985 FR
H06-188092 Jul 1994 JP
H07-056000 Mar 1995 JP
H07-194592 Aug 1995 JP
H08-128971 Jul 1996 JP
H11-304728 Nov 1999 JP
H11-352079 Dec 1999 JP
2000-306533 Nov 2000 JP
2001-021507 Jan 2001 JP
2003-149392 May 2003 JP
2003-288853 Oct 2003 JP
2004-089445 Mar 2004 JP
2004-518262 Jun 2004 JP
2007-218683 Aug 2007 JP
2007-265981 Oct 2007 JP
2007-311185 Nov 2007 JP
2008-200359 Apr 2008 JP
2008-145111 Jun 2008 JP
2008-197495 Aug 2008 JP
2009-195349 Mar 2009 JP
2009-212058 Sep 2009 JP
2010-236986 Oct 2010 JP
2011-029072 Feb 2011 JP
2011-033537 Feb 2011 JP
2011-218147 Nov 2011 JP
2012-032387 Feb 2012 JP
2012-187341 Oct 2012 JP
2012-254294 Dec 2012 JP
2013-508683 Mar 2013 JP
2015-529984 Jul 2013 JP
2013-157269 Aug 2013 JP
2013-160637 Aug 2013 JP
2013-181811 Sep 2013 JP
2013-239317 Nov 2013 JP
2015-002074 Jan 2015 JP
2015-047306 Mar 2015 JP
2015-072263 Apr 2015 JP
2015-077289 Apr 2015 JP
2017-040618 Feb 2017 JP
10-2012-0091591 Aug 2012 KR
10-2014-0059688 May 2014 KR
WO 1995006952 Mar 1995 WO
WO 1998011592 Mar 1998 WO
WO 2002039792 May 2002 WO
WO 2003081631 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2005109969 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006096052 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2007125833 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008068044 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2009098027 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009104560 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2010109909 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2011032572 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2012032950 Mar 2012 WO
WO 2013004574 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013111050 Aug 2013 WO
WO 2013118593 Aug 2013 WO
WO 2013160153 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2013168468 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014054497 Apr 2014 WO
WO 2015016019 Feb 2015 WO
WO 2015034791 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015066333 May 2015 WO
WO 2015084466 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2015152490 Oct 2015 WO
WO 2015168473 Nov 2015 WO
WO 2015176023 Nov 2015 WO
WO 2015187219 Dec 2015 WO
WO 2016187623 Nov 2016 WO
WO 2017031740 Mar 2017 WO
WO 2017204850 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2017213996 Dec 2017 WO
WO 2018122213 Jul 2018 WO
WO 2018175570 Sep 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (310)
Entry
“Diamond,” Section 10.4.2 of Zorman et al., “Material Aspects of Micro-Nanoelectromechanical Systems,” Chapter 10 of Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, 2nd ed., Bharat Bhushan, ed. (Springer Science+ Business Media, Inc., New York, 2007), pp. 312-314.
“Element Six CVD Diamond Handbook” (Element Six, Luxembourg, 2015).
“High performance benchtop EDXRF spectrometer with Windows®® software,” published by: Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan; 2017.
“Monochromatic Doubly Curved Crystal Optics,” published by: X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc. (XOS), East Greenbush, NY; 2017.
“Optics and Detectors,” Section 4 of X-Ray Data Booklet, 3rd Ed., A.C. Thompson ed. (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, 2009).
“Properties of Solids,” Ch. 12 of CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 90th ed., Devid R. Lide & W.M. “Mickey” Haynes, eds. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009), pp. 12-41-12-46; 12-203-12-212.
“Science and Technology of Future Light Sources”, Arthur L. Robinson (LBNL) and Brad Plummer (SLAG), eds. Report Nos. ANL-08/39 / BNL-81895-2008 / LBNL-1090E-2009 / SLAC-R-917 (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, Dec. 2008).
“Series 5000 Packaged X-ray Tubes,” Product Technical Data Sheet DS006 Rev. G, X-Ray Technologies Inc. (Oxford Instruments), Scotts Valley, CA (no date).
“Toward Control of Matter: Energy Science Needs for a New Class of X-Ray Light Sources” (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, Sep. 2008).
“X-ray Optics for BES Light Source Facilities,” Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on X-ray Optics for BES Light Source Facilities, D. Mills & H. Padmore, Co-Chairs, (U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Potomac, MD, Mar. 2013).
Abullian et al., “Quantitative determination of the lateral density and intermolecular correlation between proteins anchored on the membrane surfaces using grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering and grazing incidence X-ray fluorescence,” Nov. 28, 2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 137, pp. 204907-1 to 204907-8.
Adachi et al., “Development of the 17-inch Direct-Conversion Dynamic Flat-panel X-ray Detector (FPD),” Digital R/F (Shimadzu Corp., 2 pages (no date, published—2004 with product release).
Aharonovich et al., “Diamond Nanophotonics,” Adv. Op. Mat'ls vol. 2, Issue 10 (2014).
Akan et al., “Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching and Electroless Deposition for Fabrication of Hard X-ray Pd/Si Zone Plates,” Micromachines, vol. 11, 301; doi:10.3390/mi11030301 (2020).
Als-Nielsen et al., “X-rays and their interaction with matter”, and “Sources”, Ch. 1 & 2 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011).
Als-Nielsen et al., “Refraction and reflection from interfaces,” Ch. 3 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition,” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011), pp. 69-112.
Als-Nielsen et al., “Photoelectric Absorption,” Ch. 7 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition,” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011).
Als-Nielsen et al., “Phase contrast imaging” Sect. 9.3 of Ch. 9 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition” , (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011), pp. 318-329.
Altapova et al., “Phase contrast laminography based on Talbot interferometry,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, No. 6, (2012) pp. 6496-6508.
Ando et al., “Smooth and high-rate reactive ion etching of diamond,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 11, (2002) pp. 824-827.
Arfelli et al., “Mammography with Synchrotron Radiation: Phase-Detection Techniques,” Radiology vol. 215, (2000), pp. 286-293.
Arndt et al., Focusing Mirrors for Use with Microfocus X-ray Tubes, 1998, Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 31, pp. 733-741.
Bachucki et al., “Laboratory-based double X-ray spectrometer for simultaneous X-ray emission and X-ray absorption studies,” J. Anal. Atomic Spectr. DOI:10.1039/C9JA00159J (2019).
Balaic et al., “X-ray optics of tapered capillaries,” Appl. Opt. vol. 34 (Nov. 1995) pp. 7263-7272.
Baltes et al., “Coherent and incoherent grating reconstruction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 3(8), (1986), pp. 1268-1275.
Barbee Jr., “Multilayers for x-ray optics,” Opt. Eng. vol. 25 (Aug. 1986) pp. 898-915.
Baron et al., “A compact optical design for Bragg reflections near backscattering,” J. Synchrotron Rad., vol. 8 (2001), pp. 1127-1130.
Bech, “X-ray imaging with a grating interferometer,” University of Copenhagen PhD. Thesis, (May 1, 2009).
Bech, “In-vivo dark-field and phase-contrast x-ray imaging,” Scientific Reports 3, (2013), Article No. 03209.
Behling, “Medical X-ray sources Now and for the Future,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Physics Research A 873, pp. 43-50 (2017).
Bergamin et al., “Measuring small lattice distortions in Si-crystals by phase-contrast x-ray topography,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (Dec. 31, 2000) pp. 2678-2682.
Bernstorff, “Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS),” Presentation at Advanced School on Synchrotron and Free Electron Laser Sources and their Multidisciplinary Applications, Apr. 2008, Trieste, Italy.
Bilderback et al., “Single Capillaries,” Ch. 29 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Birkholz, “Chapter 4: Grazing Incidence Configurations,” Thin Film Analysis by X-ray Scattering (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2006).
Bjeoumikhov et al., “A modular system for XRF and XRD applications consisting of a microfocus X-ray source and different capillary optics,” X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 33 (2004), pp. 312-316.
Bjeoumikhov et al., “Capillary Optics for X-Rays,” Ch. 18 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 287-306.
Buchanan et al., “Effective modelling of high-energy laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast imaging utilising absorption masks or gratings,” J. Appl. Physics (accepted) (2020).
Canberra Model S-5005 WinAxil X-Ray Analysis Software, published by: Canberra Eurisys Benelux N.V./S.A.,Zellik, Belgium; Jun. 2004.
Cerrina, “The Schwarzschild Objective,” Ch. 27 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Chang et al., “Ultra-high aspect ratio high-resolution nanofabrication of hard X-ray diffractive optics,” Nature Comm. 5:4243, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5243 (2014).
Chen et al., “Guiding and focusing neutron beams using capillary optics,” Nature vol. 357 (Jun. 4, 1992), pp. 391-393.
Chen et al., “Advance in detection of low sulfur content by wavelength dispersive XRF,” Proceedings of the Annual ISA Analysis Division Symposium (2002).
Chen et al., “Doubly curved crystal (DCC) X-ray optics and applications,” Powder Diffraction, vol. 17(2) (2002), pp. 99-103.
Chervenak et al., “Experimental thick-target bremsstrahlung spectra from electrons in the range 10 to 30 keV”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 12 (1975), pp. 26-33.
Chon, “Measurement of Roundness for an X-Ray Mono-Capillary Optic by Using Computed Tomography,” J. Korean Phys. Soc. vol. 74, No. 9, pp. 901-906 (May 2019).
Coan et al., “In vivo x-ray phase contrast analyzer-based imaging for longitudinal osteoarthritis studies in guinea pigs,” Phys. Med. Biol. vol. 55(24) (2010), pp. 7649-7662.
Cockcroft et al., “Chapter 2: Experimental Setups,” Powder Diffraction: Theory and Practice, R.E. Dinnebier and S.J.L. Billinge, eds (Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing, London, UK, 2008).
Cohen et al., “Tunable laboratory extended x-ray absorption fine structure system,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1980, pp. 273-277.
Cong et al., “Fourier transform-based iterative method for differential phase-contrast computed tomography”, Opt. Lett. vol. 37 (2012), pp. 1784-1786.
Cornaby et al., “Advances in X-ray Microfocusing with Monocapillary Optics at Chess,” Chess News Magazine (2009), pp. 63-66.
Cornaby et al., “Design of Single-Bounce Monocapillary X-ray Optics,” Advances in X-ray Analysis: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, vol. 50, (International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD), 2007), pp. 194-200.
Cornaby, “The Handbook of X-ray Single Bounce Monocapillary Optics, Including Optical Design and Synchrotron Applications” (PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, May 2008).
Datta et al., “A new generation of direct X-ray detectors for medical and synchrotron imaging applications,” Sci. Reports, vol. 10, p. 20097 (2020).
David et al., “Fabrication of diffraction gratings for hard x-ray phase contrast imaging,” Microelectron. Eng. vol. 84, (2007), pp. 1172-1177.
David et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography using a grating interferometer,” Spectrochimica Acta Part B vol. 62 (2007) pp. 626-630.
Davis et al., “Bridging the Micro-to-Macro Gap: A New Application for Micro X-Ray Fluorescence,” Microsc Microanal., vol. 17(3) (Jun. 2011), pp. 410-417.
Diaz et al., “Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images,” In: Digital Mammography, Proceedings 10th International Workshop IWDM 2010 (Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), (2010), pp. 628-635 (9 pages). Jun. 18, 2010.
Ding et al., “Reactive Ion Etching of CVD Diamond Films for MEMS Applications,” Micromachining and Microfabrication, Proc. SPIE vol. 4230 (2000), pp. 224-230.
Dittler et al., “A mail-in and user facility for X-ray absorption near-edge structure: the CEI-XANES laboratory X-ray spectrometer at University of Washington,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, eight pages, (2019).
Dobrovinskaya et al., “Thermal Properties,” Sect. 2.1.5 of “Sapphire: Material, Manufacturing, Applications” (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2009).
Dong et al., “Improving Molecular Sensitivity in X-Ray Fluorescence Molecular Imaging (XFMI) of Iodine Distribution in Mouse-Sized Phantoms via Excitation Spectrum Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 56966-56976 (2018).
Erko et al., “X-ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198.
Falcone et al., “New directions in X-ray microscopy,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 52, No. 4, (Jul.-Aug. 2010), pp. 293-318.
Fernández-Ruiz, “TXRF Spectrometry as a Powerful Tool for the Study of Metallic Traces in Biological Systems,” Development in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 1 (2014), pp. 1-14.
Freund, “Mirrors for Synchrotron Beamlines,” Ch. 26 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Ge et al., “Investigation of the partially coherent effects in a 2D Talbot interferometer,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. vol. 401. (2011), pp. 865-870. Apr. 29, 2011 pub Jun. 14, 2011.
Gibson et al., “Polycapillary Optics: An Enabling Technology for New Applications,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 45 (2002), pp. 286-297.
Gonzales et al., “Angular distribution of thick-target bremsstrahlung produced by electrons with initial energies ranging from 10 to 20 keV incident on Ag”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 84 (2011): 052726.
Gonzales et al., “Angular Distribution of Bremsstrahlung Produced by 10-Kev and 20 Kev Electrons Incident on a Thick Au Target”, in Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, AIP Conf. Proc. 1221 (2013), pp. 114-117.
Graetz et al., “Lenseless C-ray Nano-Tomography down to 150 nm Resolution: On the Quantification of Modulation Transfer and Focal Spot of the Lab-based ntCT System,” arXiv:2009.11749v1 [physics.ins-det] Sep. 24, 2020, 10 pages.
Günther et al., “Full-field structured-illumination super-resolution X-ray transmission microscopy,” Nature Comm. 10:2494 (2019) and supplementary information.
Guttmann et al., “Ellipsoidal capillary as condenser for the BESSY full-field x-ray microscope,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. vol. 186 (2009): 012064.
Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 7804 (2010), 780411.
Harasse et al., “Iterative reconstruction in x-ray computed laminography from differential phase measurements”, Opt. Express. vol. 19 (2011), pp. 16560-16573.
Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with a Grating Interferometer using Iterative Reconstruction”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 163-168.
Hashimoto et al., “Improved reconstruction method for phase stepping data with stepping errors and dose fluctuations,” Optics Express, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 16363-16384 (2020).
Hasse et al., “New developments in laboratory-based x-ray sources and optics,” Adv. in Laboratory-based X-Ray Sources, Optics, and Applications VI, ed. A.M. Khounsary, Proc. SPIE vol. 10387, 103870B-1 (2017).
Hemraj-Benny et al., “Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy as a Tool for Investigating Nanomaterials,” Small, vol. 2(1), (2006), pp. 26-35.
Henke et al., “X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at E=50-30000 eV, Z=1-92,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 54 (No. 2) (Jul. 1993), pp. 181-342.
Hennekam et al., “Trace metal analysis of sediment cores using a novel X-ray fluorescence core scanning method,” Quaternary Int'l, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.10.018 (2018).
Honma et al., Full-automatic XAFS Measurement System of the Engineering Science Research II beamline BL14B2 at Spring-8, 2011, AIP Conference Proceedings 1234, pp. 13-16.
Howard et al., “High-Definition X-ray Fluorescence Elemental Mapping of Paintings,” Anal. Chem., 2012, vol. 84(7), pp. 3278-3286.
Howells, “Mirrors for Synchrotron-Radiation Beamlines,” Publication LBL-34750 (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Sep. 1993).
Howells, “Gratings and Monochromators in the VUV and Soft X-Ray Spectral Region,” Ch. 21 of “Handbook of Optics,” vol. III, 2nd Ed. (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Hrdy et al., “Diffractive-Refractive Optics: X-ray Crystal Monochromators with Profiled Diffracting Surfaces,” Ch. 20 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2008).
Huang et al., “Theoretical analysis and optimization of highly efficient multilayer-coated blazed gratings with high fix-focus constant for the tender X-ray region,” Op. Express Vo. 28, No. 2, pp. 821-845 (2020).
Hwang et al, “New etching process for device fabrication using diamond,” Diamond & Related Materials, vol. 13 (2004) pp. 2207-2210.
Ide-Ektessabi et al., “The role of trace metallic elements in neurodegenerative disorders: quantitative analysis using XRF and XANES spectroscopy,” Anal. Sci., vol. 21(7) (Jul. 2005), pp. 885-892.
Ihsan et al., “A microfocus X-ray tube based on a microstructured X-ray target”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B vol. 267 (2009) pp. 3566-3573.
Ishisaka et al., “A New Method of Analyzing Edge Effect in Phase Contrast Imaging with Incoherent X-rays,” Optical Review, vol. 7, No. 6, (2000), pp. 566-572.
Ito et al., “A Stable In-Laboratory EXAFS Measurement System,” Jap. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 22, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1983, pp. 357-360.
Itoh et al., “Two-dimensional grating-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging using Fourier transform phase retrieval,” Op. Express, vol. 19, No. 4 (2011) pp. 3339-3346.
Janssens et al, “Recent trends in quantitative aspects of microscopic X-ray fluorescence analysis,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29.6 (Jun. 2010): 464-478.
Jahrman et al., “Vacuum formed temporary spherically and toroidally bent crystal analyzers for x-ray absorption and x-ray emission spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Inst. vol. 90, 013106 (2019).
Jiang et al., “X-Ray Phase-Contrast Imaging with Three 2D Gratings,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging, (2008), 827152, 8 pages.
Jin et al., “Development of an X-ray tube with two selective targets modulated by a magnetic field,” Rev. Sci. Inst. vol. 90, 083105 (2019).
Joy, “Astronomical X-ray Optics,” Ch. 28 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Kalasová et al., “Characterization of a laboratory-based X-ray computed nanotomography system for propagation-based method of phase contrast imaging,” IEEE Trans. on Instr. and Meas., DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2910338 (2019).
Keyrilainen et al., “Phase contrast X-ray imaging of breast,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 51 (8), (2010), pp. 866-884. Jan. 18, 2010 pub Jun. 15, 2010.
Kidalov et al., “Thermal Conductivity of Diamond Composites,” Materials, vol. 2 (2009) pp. 2467-2495.
Kido et al., “Bone Cartilage Imaging with X-ray Interferometry using a Practical X-ray Tube”, in Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE vol. 7622 (2010), 762240.
Kim, “Talbot images of wavelength-scale amplitude gratings,” Opt. Express vol. 20(5), (2012), pp. 4904-4920.
Kim et al., “Observation of the Talbot Effect at Beamline 6C Bio Medical Imaging of the Pohang Light Source-II,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., vol. 74, No. 10, pp. 935-940 (May 2019).
Kim et al., “A Simulation Study on the Transfer Characteristics of the Talbot Pattern Through Scintillation Screens in the Grating Interferometer,” J. Rad. Sci. and Tech. 42(1), pp. 67-75 (2019).
Kirkpatrick et al., “Formation of Optical Images by X-Rays”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 38(9) (1948), pp. 766-774.
Kirz, “Phase zone plates for x-rays and the extreme uv,” J. Op. Soc. Am. vol. 64 (Mar. 1974), pp. 301-309.
Kirz et al., “The History and Future of X-ray Microscopy”, J. Physics: Conden. Series vol. 186 (2009): 012001.
Kiyohara et al., “Development of the Talbot-Lau Interferometry System Available for Clinical Use”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Cong. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 97-102.
Klockenkämper et al., “7.1 Instrumental Developments” and “7.3 Future Prospects by Combinations,” from Chapter 7 of Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015).
Klockenkämper et al., “Chapter 3: Instrumentation for TXRF and GI-XRF,” Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015).
Kottler et al., “A two-directional approach for grating based differential phase contrast imaging using hard x-rays,” Opt. Express vol. 15(3), (2007), pp. 1175-1181.
Kottler et al., “Dual energy phase contrast x-ray imaging with Talbot-Lau interferometer,” J. Appl. Phys. vol. 108(11), (2010), 114906. Jul. 7, 2010 pub Dec. 7, 2010.
Kulow et al., “On the Way to Full-Field X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Imaging with Coded Apertures,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. Doi: 10.1039/C9JA00232D (2019).
Kumakhov et al., “Multiple reflection from surface X-ray optics,” Physics Reports, vol. 191(5), (1990), pp. 289-350.
Kumakhov, “X-ray Capillary Optics. History of Development and Present Status” in Kumakhov Optics and Application, Proc. SPIE 4155 (2000), pp. 2-12.
Kuwabara et al., “Hard-X-ray Phase-Difference Microscopy with a Low-Brilliance Laboratory X-ray Source”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 062502.
Kuznetsov, “X-Ray Optics Calculator,” Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMT RAS), Chernogolovka, Russia (6 pages submitted); 2016.
Lagomarsino et al., “Reflective Optical Arrays,” Ch. 19 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al. eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 307-317.
Lai, “X-Ray Microfocusing Optics,” Slide Presentation from Argonne National Laboratory, 71 slides, Cheiron Summer School 2007.
Langhoff et al., “X-ray Sources,” Ch. 2 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2006), pp. 33-82.
Lechner et al., “Silicon drift detectors for high count rate X-ray spectroscopy at room temperature,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 458A (2001), pp. 281-287.
Leenaers et al., “Application of Glancing Incidence X-ray Analysis,” 1997, X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 26, pp. 115-121.
Lengeler et al., “Refractive X-ray Optics,” Ch. 20 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Li et al., “Source-optic-crystal optimisation for compact monochromatic imaging,” Proc. SPIE 5537 (2004), pp. 105-114.
Li et al., “X-ray phase-contrast imaging using cascade Talbot-Lau interferometers,” Proc. SPIE 10964 (2018), pp. 1096469-1-1096469-6.
Li et al., “Study on High Thermal Conductivity of X-ray Anode with Composite Diamond Substrate,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1300, 012115 (2019).
Li et al., “Production and Heat Properties of an X-ray Reflective Anode Based on a Diamond Heat Buffer Layer,” Materials vol. 13, p. 241 (2020).
Lohmann et al., “An interferometer based on the Talbot effect,” Optics Communications vol. 2 (1971), pp. 413-415.
Lübcke et al., “Soft X-ray nanoscale imaging using a sub-pixel resolution charge coupled device (CCD) camera,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 90, 043111 (2019).
Lühl et al., “Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy with efficient X-ray fluorescence detection (STXM-XRF) for biomedical applications in the soft and tender energy range,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577518016879, (2019).
MacDonald et al., “Polycapillary X-ray Optics for Microdiffraction,” J. Appl. Cryst., vol. 32 (1999) pp. 160-167.
MacDonald et al., “Polycapillary and Multichannel Plate X-Ray Optics,” Ch. 30 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
MacDonald et al., “An Introduction to X-ray and Neutron Optics,” Ch. 19 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
MacDonald, “Focusing Polycapillary Optics and Their Applications,” X-Ray Optics and Instrumentation, vol. 2010, (Oct. 2010): 867049.
Maj et al., “Etching methods for improving surface imperfections of diamonds used for x-ray monochromators,” Adv. X-ray Anal., vol. 48 (2005), pp. 176-182.
Malgrange, “X-ray Optics for Synchrotron Radiation,” ACTA Physica Polonica A, vol. 82(1) (1992) pp. 13-32.
Malzer et al., “A laboratory spectrometer for high throughput X-ray emission spectroscopy in catalysis research,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 89, 113111 (2018).
Masuda et al., “Fabrication of Through-Hole Diamond Membranes by Plasma Etching Using Anodic Porous Alumina Mask,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 4(11) (2001) pp. G101-G103.
Matsushita, “Mirrors and Multilayers,” Slide Presentation from Photon Factor, Tsukuba, Japan, 65 slides, (Cheiron School 2009, Sprint-8, Japan, Nov. 2009).
Matsushita, “X-ray monochromators,” Slide Presentation from Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Japan, 70 slides, (Cheiron School 2009, Spring-8, Japan, Nov. 2009).
Matsuyama et al., “Wavefront measurement for a hard-X-ray nanobeam using single-grating interferometry”, Opt Express vol. 20 (2012), pp. 24977-24986.
Miao et al., “Motionless phase stepping in X-ray phase contrast imaging with a compact source,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110(48), (2013), pp. 19268-19272.
Michette, “Zone and Phase Plates, Bragg-Fresnel Optics,” Ch. 23 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Mijovilovich et al., “Analysis of trace metal distribution in plants with lab-based microscopic X-ray fluorescence imaging,” Plant Methods, vol. 16, No. 82, 21 pages (2020).
Mizutani et al., X-ray microscopy for neural circuit reconstruction in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012092.
Modregger et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging,” Ch. 3 of Emerging Imaging Technologies in Medicine, M. Anastasio & P. La Riviere, ed., Crc Press, Boca Raton, FL, (2012), pp. 43-56.
Momose et al., “Phase-Contrast X-Ray Imaging Using an X-Ray Interferometer for Biological Imaging”, Analytical Sciences vol. 17 Supplement (2001), pp. i527-i530.
Momose et al.,“Demonstration of X-Ray Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 42 (2003), pp. L866-L868.
Momose et al.,“Phase Tomography Using an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography IV, Proc. SPIE vol. 5535 (2004), pp. 352-360.
Momose, “Recent Advances in X-ray Phase Imaging”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 44 (2005), pp. 6355-6367.
Momose et al., “Biomedical Imaging by Talbot-Type X-Ray Phase Tomography” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE vol. 6318 (2006) 63180T.
Momose et al., “Phase Tomography by X-ray Talbot Interferometry for Biological Imaging” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 2006 pp. 5254-5262.
Momose et al., “X-ray Talbot Interferometry with Capillary Plates”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 (2006), pp. 314-316.
Momose et al., “Phase Imaging with an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 21-30.
Momose et al., “Phase Tomography Using X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation: Ninth International Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 879 (2007), pp. 1365-1368.
Momose et al., “Sensitivity of X-ray Phase Imaging Based on Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 8077-8080.
Momose et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Imaging Using Multiline X-ray Source”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 48 (2009), 076512.
Momose et al., “X-ray phase tomography with a Talbot interferometer in combination with an X-ray imaging microscope”, in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012044.
Momose et al., “High-speed X-ray phase imaging and X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometer and white synchrotron radiation”, Opt. Express vol. 17 (2009), pp. 12540-12545.
Momose et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Talbot Interferometry”, in “Biomedical Mathematics: Promising Directions in Imaging, Therapy Planning, and Inverse Problems”, Y. Censor, M. Jiang & G.Wang, eds. (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, 2010), pp. 281-320.
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Measurements with Talbot Interferometry and Its Applications”, in International Conference on Advanced Phase Measurement Methods in Optics and Imaging, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1236 (2010), pp. 195-199.
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Using Lau Effect”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 066603.
Momose et al., “Four-dimensional X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometry and white synchrotron radiation: dynamic observation of a living worm”, Opt. Express vol. 19 (2011), pp. 8423-8432.
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging—From Static Observation to Dynamic Observation—”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 67-77.
Momose et al., “Recent Progress in X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings,” Quantum Beam Science, vol. 4, No. 9; doi:10.3390/qubs4010009 (2020).
Montgomery, “Self Imaging Objects of Infinite Aperture,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 57(6), (1967), pp. 772-778.
Morimoto et al., “Development of multiline embedded X-ray targets for X-ray phase contrast imaging,” XTOP 2012 Book of Abstracts, (Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2012), pp. 74-75.
Morimoto et al., “X-ray phase contrast imaging by compact Talbot-Lau interferometer with a signal transmission grating,” 2014, Optics Letters, vol. 39, No. 15, pp. 4297-4300.
Morimoto et al., “Design and demonstration of phase gratings for 2D single grating interferometer,” Optics Express vol. 23, No. 23, 29399 (2015).
Munro et al., Design of a novel phase contrast imaging system for mammography, 2010, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, No. 14, pp. 4169-4185.
Nango et al., “Talbot-defocus multiscan tomography using the synchrotron X-ray microscope to study the lacuno-canalicular network in mouse bone”, Biomed. Opt. Express vol. 4 (2013), pp. 917-923.
Neuhausler et al., “Non-destructive high-resolution X-ray imaging of ULSI micro-electronics using keV X-ray microscopy in Zernike phase contrast,” Microelectronic Engineering, Elsevier Publishers BV., Amsterdam, NO, vol. 83, No. 4-9 (Apr. 1, 2006) pp. 1043-1046.
Newville, “Fundamentals of XAFS,” (Univ. Of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Jul. 23, 2004).
Noda et al., “Fabrication of Diffraction Grating with High Aspect Ratio Using X-ray Lithography Technique for X-ray Phase Imaging,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46, (2007), pp. 849-851.
Noda et al., “Fabrication of High Aspect Ratio X-ray Grating Using X-ray Lithography” J. Solid Mech_ Mater. Eng. vol. 3 (2009), pp. 416-423.
Nojeh, “Carbon Nanotube Electron Sources: From Electron Beams to Energy Conversion and Optophononics”, ISRN Nanomaterials vol. 2014 (2014): 879827.
Nuhn, “From storage rings to free electron lasers for hard x-rays”, J.A37 Phys.: Condens. Matter vol. 16 (2004), pp. S3413-S34121.
Nykanen et al., “X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography,” Med. Phys. vol. 30(7), (2003), pp. 1864-1873.
Oji et al., Automatic XAFS measurement system developed at BL14B2 in SPring-8, Available online Nov. 15, 2011, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 19, pp. 54-59.
Olbinado et al., “Demonstration of Stroboscopic X-ray Talbot Interferometry Using Polychromatic Synchrotron and Laboratory X-ray Sources”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 6 (2013), 096601.
Ortega et al., “Bio-metals imaging and speciation in cells using proton and synchrotron radiation X-ray microspectroscopy,” J. Royal Society Interface vol. 6 suppl. 5 (Oct. 6, 2009), pp. 6S649-6S658.
Otendal et al., A 9 keV electron-impact liquid-gallium-jet x-ray source, Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 79 (2008): 016102.
Oxford Instruments Inc., Series 5000 Model XTF5011 X-ray Tube information, Jun. 1998, 3 pages.
Pandeshwar et al., “Modeling of beam hardening effects in a dual-phase X-ray grading interferometer for quantitative dark-field imaging,” Optics Express, vol. 28, No. 13, Jun. 22, 2020, pp. 19187-19204 (2020).
Parrill et al., “GISAXS—Glancing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Journal de Physique IV, vol. 3 (Dec. 1993), pp. 411-417.
Paunesku et al., “X-Ray Fluorescence Microprobe Imaging in Biology and Medicine,” J. Cell. Biochem. vol. 99, pp. 1489-1502 (2006).
Paxscan Flat Panel X-ray Imaging, Varian Sales Brochure, (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, Nov. 11, 2004).
Penkov et al., “X-Ray Calc: A software for the simulation of X-ray reflectivity,” SoftwareX, vol. 12, p. 100528 (2020).
Pfeiffer et al., “Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources,” Nature Physics vol. 2, (2006), pp. 258-261.
Pfeiffer et al., “Hard x-ray phase tomography with low brilliance x-ray sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 98, (2007), 108105.
Pfeiffer et al., “Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,” Nature Materials vol. 7, (2008), pp. 134-137.
Pfeiffer, “Milestones and basic principles of grating-based x-ray and neutron phase-contrast imaging,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 2-11.
Pianetta et al., “Application of synchrotron radiation to TXRF analysis of metal contamination on silicon wafer surfaces,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 373(1-2), 2000, pp. 222-226.
Potts, “Electron Probe Microanalysis”, Ch. 10 of “A Handbook of Silicate Rock Analysis” (Springer Science+ Business Media, New York, 1987), pp. 326-382 (equation quoted from p. 336).
Prewitt et al., “Focused ion beam repair: staining of photomasks and reticles,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. vol. 26 (1993), pp. 1135-1137.
Prewitt et al., “Gallium Staining in FIB Repair of Photomasks,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 21 (1993), pp. 191-196.
Prewitt et al., “FIB Repair of 5X Reticles and Effects on IC Quality,” Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 1926 (1993), pp. 517-526.
Pushie et al., “Prion protein expression level alters regional copper, iron and zinc content in the mouse brain,” Metallomics vol. 3, 206-214 (2011).
Pushie et al., “Elemental and Chemically Specific X-ray Fluorescence Imaging of Biological Systems,” Chem. Rev. 114:17, 8499-8541 (2014).
Qin et al., “Trace metal imaging with high spatial resolution: Applications in biomedicine,” Metallomics, vol. 3 (Jan. 2011), pp. 28-37.
Rayleigh, “On copying diffraction gratings and some phenomena connected therewith,” Philos. Mag. vol. 11 (1881), pp. 196-205.
Redus et al., “Spectrometer configuration and measurement uncertainty in X-ray spectroscopy,” X-Ray Spectrom., pp. 1-14 (2020).
Renaud et al., “Probing surface and interface morphology with Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 64:8 (2009), pp. 255-380.
Riege, “Electron Emission from Ferroelectrics—A Review”, CERN Report CERN AT/93-18 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Jul. 1993).
Rix et al., “Super-Resolution X-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a single 2D grating and electromagnetic source stepping,” Phys. Med. Biol. In press https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ff5 (2019).
Romano et al., “Microfabrication of X-ray Optics by Metal Assisted Chemical Etching: Aa Review,” Micromachines, vol. 11, No. 589, 23 pages (2020).
Röntgen, “Ueber eine neue Art von Strahlen (Wurzburg Verlag, Wurzburg, Germany, 1896) also, in English, On a New Kind of Rays,” Nature vol. 53 (Jan. 23 1896). pp. 274-276.
Rovezzi, “Study of the local order around magnetic impurities in semiconductors for spintronics.” PhD Dissertation, Condensed Matter, Université Joseph-Fourier—Grenoble I, 2009, English <tel-00442852>.
Rutishauser, “X-ray grating interferometry for imaging and metrology,” 2003, ETH Zurich, Diss. ETH No. 20939.
Salditt, “Nanoscale Photonic Imaging,” Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 134, T. Salditt et al., eds., Springer Open, 2020.
Sato et al., Two-dimensional gratings-based phase-contrast imaging using a conventional x-ray tube, 2011, Optics Letters, vol. 36, No. 18, pp. 3551-3553.
Scherer et al., “Bi-Directional X-Ray Phase-Contrast Mammography,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, Issue 5 (May 2014) e93502.
Scholz, “X-ray Tubes and Monochromators,” Technical Workshop EPIC, Universität Würzburg (2007); 41 slides, 2007.
Scholze et al., “X-ray Detectors and XRF Detection Channels,” Ch. 4 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198.
Scordo et al., “Pyrolytic Graphite Mosaic Crystal Thickness and Mosaicity Optimization for an Extended Source Von Hamos X-ray Spectrometer,” Condens. Matter Vo. 4, pp. 38-52 (2019).
Scott, “Hybrid Semiconductor Detectors for High Spatial Resolution Phase-contrast X-ray Imaging,” Thesis, University of Waterloo, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2019.
Sebert, “Flat-panel detectors:how much better are they?” Pediatr. Radiol. vol. 36 (Suppl 2), (2006), pp. 173-181.
Seifert et al., “Talbot-Lau x-ray phase-contrast setup for fast scanning of large samples,” Sci. Rep. 9:4199, pp. 1-11 (2019).
Senba et al., “Stable sub-micrometre high-flux probe for soft X-ray ARPES using a monolithic Wolter mirror,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 27, 5 pages, (2020).
Shen, “Polarizing Crystal Optics,” Ch. 25 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Shi et al., “Towards the Fabrication of High-Aspect-Ratio Silicon Gratings by Deep Reactive Ion Etching,” Micromachines, vol. 11, p. 864, 13 pages (2020).
Shields et al., “Overview of Polycapillary X-ray Optics,” Powder Diffraction, vol. 17(2) (Jun. 2002), pp. 70-80.
Shimura et al., “Hard x-ray phase contrast imaging using a tabletop Talbot-Lau interferometer with multiline embedded x-ray targets”, Opt. Lett. vol. 38(2) (2013), pp. 157-159.
Siddons, “Crystal Monochromators and Bent Crystals,” Ch. 22 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Smith, “Fundamentals of Digital Mammography:Physics, Technology and Practical Considerations,” Publication R-BI-016 (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA, Mar. 2005).
Snigirev et al., “Hard X-Ray Microoptics,” Ch. 17 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 255-285.
Sparks Jr., “X-ray Fluorescence Microprobe for Chemical Analysis,” in Synchrotron Radiation Research, H. Winick & S. Doniach, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, NY 1980), pp. 459-512.
Spiller, “Multilayers,” Ch. 24 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Stampanoni et al., “The First Analysis and Clinical Evaluation of Native Breast Tissue Using Differential Phase-Contrast Mammography,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 46, pp. 801-806. pub 2011-12-xx.
Strüder et al., “X-Ray Detectors,” Ch. 4 of “X-ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” K. Tsuji et al. eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2004), pp. 63-131.
Strüder et al., “Silicon Drift Detectors for X-ray Imaging,” Presentation at Detector Workshop on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, 54 slides, (Argonne Nat'l Lab, Argonne, IL Dec. 8, 2005), available at: http://www.aps.anl.gov/News/Conferences/2005/Synchrotron_Radiation_Instrumentation/Presentations/Strueder.pdf.
Stupple et al., “Modeling of Heat Transfer in an Aluminum X-Ray Anode Employing a Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond Heat Spreader,” J. Heat Transfer, Vo. 140, 124501-1-5 (Dec. 2018).
Sun et al., “Numerical design of in-line X-ray phase-contrast imaging based on ellipsoidal single-bounce monocapillary,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. A746 (2014) pp. 33-38.
Sun et al., “Combined optic system based on polycapillary X-ray optics and single-bounce monocapillary optics for focusing X-rays from a conventional laboratory X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. A 802 (2015) pp. 5-9.
Sunday et al., “X-ray Metrology for the Semiconductor Industry Tutorial,” J. Res. Nat'l Inst. Stan. vol. 124: 124003 (2019); https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.124.003.
Suzuki, “Development of the DIGITEX Satire Cardiac System Equipped with Direct conversion Flat Panel Detector,” Digital Angio Technical Report (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan, no date, published—2004 with product release).
Suzuki et al., “Hard X-ray Imaging Microscopy using X-ray Guide Tube as Beam Condenser for Field Illumination,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. vol. 463 (2013): 012028.
Takahama, “RADspeed safire Digital General Radiography System Equipped with New Direct—Conversion FPD,” Medical Now, No. 62 (2007).
Takeda et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Single Phase Grating”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46 (2007), pp. L89-L91.
Takeda et al., “Differential Phase X-ray Imaging Microscopy with X-ray Talbot Interferometer” Appl. Phys. Express vol. 1 (2008) 117002.
Takeda et al., “In vivo physiological saline-infused hepatic vessel imaging using a two-crystal-interferometer-based phase-contrast X-ray technique”, J. Synchrotron Radiation vol. 19 (2012), pp. 252-256.
Takeo et al., “Soft x-ray nanobeam formed by an ellipsoidal mirror,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 116, 121102 (2020).
Takeo et al., “A highly efficient nanofocusing system for soft x rays,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 117, 151104 (2020).
Talbot, “Facts relating to optical science No. IV,” Philos. Mag. vol. 9 (1836), pp. 401-407.
Tanaka et al., “Cadaveric and in vivo human joint imaging based on differential phase contrast by X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry”, Z. Med. Phys. vol. 23 (2013), pp. 222-227.
Tang et al., “Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT): a novel approach for intraoperative breast cancer specimen imaging,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat. vol. 139, pp. 311-316 (2013).
Taniguchi et al., “Diamond nanoimprint lithography,” Nanotechnology, vol. 13 (2002) pp. 592-596.
Taphorn et al., “Grating-based spectral X-ray dark-field imaging for correlation with structural size measures,” Sci. Reports, vol. 10, 13195 (2020).
Terzano et al., Recent advances in analysis of trace elements in environmental samples by X-ray based techniques (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 2019.
Tkachuk et al., “High-resolution x-ray tomography using laboratory sources”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE 6318 (2006): 631810.
Tkachuk et al., “Multi-length scale x-ray tomography using laboratory and synchrotron sources”, Microsc. Microanal. vol. 13 (Suppl. 2) (2007), pp. 1570-1571.
Töpperwien et al., “Multiscale x-ray phase-contrast tomography in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Biomed. Op. Express, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 92-103.
Touzelbaev et al., “Applications of micron-scale passive diamond layers for the integrated circuits and microelectromechanical systems industries,” Diamond and Rel. Mat'ls, vol. 7 (1998) pp. 1-14.
Tsuji et al., “X-Ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, West Susses, Uk 2004), Chapters 1-7.
Tucker, “Design of X-Ray Source for Real-Time Computed Tomography,” Dissertation, Missouri Univ. of Sci. And Tech., Scholars' Mine, 104 pages (2020).
Udagawa, “An Introduction to In-House EXAFS Facilities,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 6, (1) (1989), pp. 20-27.
Udagawa, “An Introduction to X-ray Absorption Fine Structure,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 11(2)(1994), pp. 30-39.
Uehara et al., “Effectiveness of X-ray grating interferometry for non-destructive inspection of packaged devices”, J. Appl. Phys. vol. 114 (2013), 134901.
Viermetz et al., “High resolution laboratory grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT,” Scientific Reports 8:15884 (2018).
Vogt, “X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy: A Tool for Biology, Life Science and Nanomedicine,” Presentation on May 16, 2012 at James Madison Univ., Harrisonburg, VA (31 slides), 2012.
Wan et al.,“Fabrication of Multiple Slit Using Stacked-Sliced Method for Hard X-ray Talbot—Lau Interferometer”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 7412-7414.
Wang et al., “Precise patterning of diamond films for MEMS application” Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol. 127 (2002), pp. 230-233.
Wang et al., “Advantages of intermediate X-ray energies in Zernike phase contrast X-ray microscopy,” Biotech. Adv., vol. 31 (2013) pp. 387-392.
Wang et al., “Non-invasive classification of microcalcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography,” Nature Comm. vol. 5:3797, pp. 1-9 (2014).
Wang, On the single-photon-counting (SPC) modes of imaging using an XFEL source, presented at IWORLD 2015.
Wang et al., “Measuring the average slope error of a single-bounce ellipsoidal glass monocapillary X-ray condenser based on an X-ray source with an adjustable source size,” Nucl. Inst. And Meth. A934, 36-40 (2019).
Wang et al., “High beam-current density of a 10-keV nano-focus X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A940, 475-478 (2019).
Wang et al., “Double-spherically bent crystal high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy of spatially extended sources,” Chinese Optics Lett., vol. 18(6), 061101 (2020).
Wansleben et al., “Photon flux determination of a liquid-metal jet x-ray source by means of photon scattering,” arXiv:1903.06024v1, Mar. 14, 2019.
Weitkamp et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography with a grating interferometer,” Proc. SPIE vol. 5535, (2004), pp. 137-142.
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,” Opt. Express vol. 13(16), (2005), pp. 6296-6304.
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront analysis and optics characterization with a grating interferometer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 86, (2005), 054101.
Weitkamp et al., Tomography with grating interferometers at low-brilliance sources, 2006, SPIE, vol. 6318, pp. 0S-1 to 0S-10.
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront diagnostics with Talbot interferometers,” International Workshop on X-Ray Diagnostics and Scientific Application of the European XFEL, Ryn, Poland, (2010), 36 slides.
Weitkamp et al., “Design aspects of X-ray grating interferometry,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 84-89.
Wen et al., “Fourier X-ray Scattering Radiography Yields Bone Structural Information,” Radiology, vol. 251 (2009) pp. 910-918.
Wen et al., “Single-shot x-ray differential phase-contrast and diffraction imaging using two-dimensional transmission gratings,” Op. Lett. vol. 35, No. 12, (2010) pp. 1932-1934.
Wilde et al., “Modeling of an X-ray grating-based imaging interferometer using ray tracing,” Op. Express vol. 28, No. 17, p. 24657 (2020).
Wittry et al., “Properties of fixed-position Bragg diffractors for parallel detection of x-ray spectra,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 64, pp. 2195-2200 (1993).
Wobrauschek et al., “Micro XRF of light elements using a polycapillary lens and an ultra-thin window Silicon Drift Detector inside a vacuum chamber,” 2005, International Centre for Diffraction Data 2005, Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 48, pp. 229-235.
Wobrauschek et al., “Energy Dispersive, X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, R.A. Meyers, Ed. (Wiley 2010).
Wolter, “Spiegelsysteme streifenden Einfalls als abbildende Optiken fur Rontgenstrahlen” [Grazing Incidence Reflector Systems as Imaging Optics for X-rays] Annalen der Physik vol. 445, Issue 1-2 (1952), pp. 94-114.
X-ray-Optics.de Website, http://www.x-ray-optics.de/, accessed Feb. 13, 2016.
Yakimchuk et al., “Ellipsoidal Concentrators for Laboratory X-ray Sources: Analytical approaches for optimization,” Mar. 22, 2013, Crystallography Reports, vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 355-364.
Yamada et al., “Compact full-field hard x-ray microscope based on advanced Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors,” Optica, vol. 7, No. 4 pp. 367-370 (2020).
Yamamoto, “Fundamental physics of vacuum electron sources”, Reports on Progress in Physics vol. 69, (2006), pp. 181-232.
Yanagihara et al., “X-Ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “X-ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” K. Tsuji et al. eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2004), pp. 63-131.
Yang et al., “Analysis of Intrinsic Stress in Diamond Films by X-ray Diffraction,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 43 (2000), pp. 151-156.
Yang et al., “Comperative stucy of single-layer, bilayer, and trilayer mirrors with enhanced x-ray reflectance in 0.5- to 80keV energy region,” J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., vol. 6(4) 044001, 12 pages (2020).
Yashiro et al., “Optimal Design of Transmission Grating for X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 375-379.
Yashiro et al., “Efficiency of capturing a phase image using cone-beam x-ray Talbot interferometry”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 25 (2008), pp. 2025-2039.
Yashiro et. al., “Hard-X-Ray Phase-Difference Microscopy Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 103 (2009), 180801.
Yashiro et al., “Hard x-ray phase-imaging microscopy using the self-imaging phenomenon of a transmission grating”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 82 (2010), 043822.
Yashiro et al., “On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Opt. Express (2010), pp. 16890-16901.
Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Microscopy using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in The 10th International Conference on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1234 (2010), pp. 473-476.
Yashiro et al., “Distribution of unresolvable anisotropic microstructures revealed in visibility-contrast images using x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Phys. Rev. B vol. 84 (2011), 094106.
Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging and Tomography Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in “The 10th International Conference on X-ray Microscopy Radiation Instrumentation”, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1365 (2011) pp. 317-320.
Yashiro et al., “Theoretical Aspect of X-ray Phase Microscopy with Transmission Gratings” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 144-149.
Yoshioka et al., “Imaging evaluation of the cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an x-ray phase imaging apparatus based on Talbot-Lau interferometry,” Scientific Reports, 10:6561, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63155-9 (2020).
Yu et al., “Morphology and Microstructure of Tungsten Films by Magnetron Sputtering,” Mat. Sci. Forum, vol. 913, pp. 416-423 (2018).
Zanette et al., “Two-Dimensional X-Ray Grating interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 105 (2010) pp. 248102-1 248102-4.
Zeeshan et al., “In-house setup for laboratory-based x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy measurements,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 90, 073105 (2019).
Zeng et al., “Ellipsoidal and parabolic glass capillaries as condensers for x-ray microscopes,” Appl. Opt. vol. 47 (May 2008), pp. 2376-2381.
Zeng et al., “Glass Monocapillary X-ray Optics and Their Applications in X-Ray Microscopy,” X-ray Optics and Microanalysis: Proceedings of the 20th International Congress, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1221, (2010), pp. 41-47.
Zhang et al., “Fabrication of Diamond Microstructures by Using Dry and Wet Etching Methods”, Plasma Science and Technology vol. 15(6) (Jun. 2013), pp. 552-554.
Zhang et al., “Application of confocal X-ray fluorescence based on capillary X-ray optics in nondestructively measuring the inner diameter of monocapillary optics,” Optics Comm. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.11.064.
Zhang et al., “Measurement of the inner diameter of monocapillary with confocal X-ray scattering technology based on capillary X-ray optics,” Appl. Opt. (Jan. 8, 2019), doc ID 351489, pp. 1-10.
Zhou et al., “Quasi-parallel X-ray microbeam obtained using a parabolic monocapillary X-ray lens with an embedded square-shaped lead occluder,” arXiv:2001.04667 (2020).
Zhou et al., “A study of new type electric field modulation multi-target X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Physics Research A, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima2020.164342 (2020).
Zhou et al., “X-ray wavefront characterization with grating interferometry using an x-ray microfocus laboratory source,” Proceedings, vol. 11492, Advances in Metrology for X-Ray and EUV Optics IX; 114920Q, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2576152 (2020).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200350138 A1 Nov 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62703836 Jul 2018 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16518713 Jul 2019 US
Child 16866953 US