High bulk paper

Abstract

A method and apparatus are disclosed for making a high bulk, coated paper of a unique structure with the coating forming a lower portion of the total caliper and the paper base forming a higher portion of the total caliper than conventionally made coated paper of the same weight. The process includes the step of using furnish with a high percentage of mechanical pulp, applying that furnish to papermachine wires, preferably with a gap former, coating the paper with a coating containing a plastic pigment, preferably of 4 or more parts per 100 parts of coating pigment, and calendering the coated paper at a nip loading less than conventional supercalendering nip loading. Preferably, the finished coated paper will have a 75° TAPPI gloss of 40 or above. The method and apparatus can be used to make lightweight or other weights of coated paper.

Description

DISCLOSURE

[0001] This invention relates to high bulk paper and preferably to high bulk coated paper with good printed gloss.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Heretofore, it has been known to make lightweight, high bulk paper. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,129, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. However, that patent achieves high bulk by using coating that tends to be bulkier than conventional coating.

[0003] Other prior art attempts have been used to make high bulk coated paper by utilizing lower than conventional supercalendering nip pressures. However, these papers generally had low gloss, usually well below a 75° TAPPI gloss of 40, namely about 35. Consolidated Papers, Inc., the assignee of the present invention, had commercially sold similarly made lower gloss, high bulk papers as early as 1993. Such lower gloss paper is not acceptable for many publication purposes, such as magazines where lightweight, high bulk paper, with high gloss and good print gloss has been desired and sought for years due to ever increasing mailing rates.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0004] A method and apparatus is disclosed for making a high bulk, coated paper of a unique structure with the coating forming a lower portion of the total caliper and the paper base forming a higher portion of the total caliper than conventionally made coated paper of the same weight. This approach provides a bulkier, coated paper. The process includes the steps of using furnish with a high percentage, say over 50%, and preferably in a range of 55 to 75%, with a target of 60 to 65%, of mechanical pulp, or other similar pulps described herein, applying that furnish to two or twin wire papermachines, preferably with a gap former, coating the paper with a coating containing a plastic pigment in a concentration of 4 or more parts, and preferably 7 or more parts per 100 parts of coating pigment, and calendering the coated paper at a loading less than conventional supercalender loading. The use of mechanical pulp in the base sheet and a high content of plastic pigment in the coating gives a good surface finish that is easily calendered, either by lower pounds per linear inch supercalendering or hot-soft calendering to a high gloss acceptable to most publishers interested in lightweight coated paper for magazines or other similar uses. Preferably, the finished coated paper will have a 75° TAPPI gloss of 40 or above. The method or process and apparatus of the present invention can also be used to make other than lightweight grades of coated paper such as ultra lightweight coated paper. While the invention is directed toward coated paper for offset printing, it can be utilized for other coated papers for gravure, flexographic or letterpress printing.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0005] The present invention method, apparatus and paper itself is described in conjunction with the following drawings wherein:

[0006] FIG. 1 shows a gap former section for use with the present invention;

[0007] FIG. 2A shows a conventional press section;

[0008] FIG. 2B shows an extended nip press section for use with the present invention;

[0009] FIG. 2C shows another version of an extended nip press for use with the present invention;

[0010] FIG. 3 shows a main dryer section for use with the present invention, which connects to FIG. 4 as shown by the heavy arrows;

[0011] FIG. 4 shows two online coaters and accompanying coater dryers for use with the present invention;

[0012] FIG. 5A shows tandem hot-soft calenders for use with the present invention;

[0013] FIG. 5B shows a supercalender for use with the present invention;

[0014] FIG. 6A shows conventional prior art lightweight coated paper of the same weight as in FIGS. 6B to 6D;

[0015] FIG. 6B shows prior art Consolidated Papers, Inc. made coated paper;

[0016] FIG. 6C shows other prior art coated paper; and

[0017] FIG. 6D shows coated paper of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0018] As briefly discussed above, publishers and printers generally desire paper with gloss in unprinted portions and high print gloss with good ink/color properties in printed portions. Attempts have been ongoing to develop high bulk, lightweight coated papers with high print gloss.

[0019] In the present invention, a high bulk coated paper is developed which proportionally uses more base stock and less coat weight than similar grades of conventional paper of the same total weight. For example, while a conventional 30 pounds per ream paper, where herein a ream is 3300 square feet of paper, may have the following properties:

Base Weight Coating Weight
22 lbs./rm  8 lbs./rm

[0020] paper of the present invention has:

Base Weight Coating Weight
25 lbs./rm  5 lbs./rm

[0021] For a heavier paper of 32 lbs. per ream the data is:

Conventional	Present Invention
Base Weight	Coating Weight	Base Weight	Coating Weight
24 lbs./rm	8 lbs./rm	26.5 lbs./rm	5.5 lbs./rm

[0022] For 38 pound paper:

Conventional	Present Invention
Base Weight	Coating Weight	Base Weight	Coating Weight
27 lbs./rm	11 lbs./rm	31.5 lbs./rm	6.5 lbs./rm

[0023] The caliper of the papers above are as follows:

		Caliper	Caliper
	Pound	Conventional	Present Invention
	30	1.5 to 1.65 mils	1.75 to 1.9 mils
	32	1.6 to 1.75 mils	1.85 to 2.0 mils
	38	1.8 to 2.0 mils	2.0 to 2.2 mils

[0024] The paper of the present invention, made using the method and apparatus of the present invention, would start with a waterbome furnish having a high percentage of mechanical pulp, generally in excess of 50%, usually in the 55 to 75% range, and preferably about 65%. Mechanical pulp gives a well formed base. As used herein, the term mechanical pulp may include stone ground wood (SGW), pressurized ground wood (PGW) and chemi ground wood (CGW), refiner mechanical pulp (RMP), thermal mechanical pulp (TMP), and chemi thermal mechanical pulp (CTMP). Sample furnish formulations are: (1) 45% TMP/20% SGW/35% softwood Kraft (SWK) and (2) 50% TMP/25% PGW/25% SWK. SWK is not considered a mechanical pulp. Another example might be 70-85% CTMP/30-15% SWK.

[0025] The furnish preferably is utilized in a papermaking apparatus or machine having a gap former (FIG. 1) instead of a conventional fourdinier. A typical gap former for use with the present invention is a Voith-Sulzer GmbH Duo Former CFD. The gap former provides somewhat denser web base surfaces so that an AVS formation index of 75% or greater with a flock index of 15 or less and a void index of 15 or less are achieved, providing a smooth, more uniform base paper which is more easily covered with less coat weight as discussed below. The less porous paper surface reduces or minimizes coating penetration. The inherent ability of former gap to reduce two sidedness of the paper base permits achieving minimum coating application with good gloss.

[0026] The above made paper then moves into the press section wherein it can be conventionally pressed. Preferably, the press section may include a wide shoe or extended nip press (FIG. 2B or 2C) which is believed will compress the web less than is conventional, resulting in the paper web retaining more bulk and/or caliper. The extended nip press preserves bulk, yet permits water removal from the web due to the extended time the web is in the nip, which permits use of a nip pressure that is lower than conventional. Such an extended nip press is made by Beloit Corporation as model ENP-C.

[0027] The web is then sent through the dryer section (FIG. 3) and dried to a moisture content of below 10%, and preferably to 5% or less. The paper may then be coated on or off the papermaking machine.

[0028] As noted above, the coating weight applied to the web is less than conventional, but because of the smoothness and uniformity of the gap formed paper base, the paper base can be acceptably coated with a lesser amount of coating, thus yielding high bulk and allowing a given weight paper to proportionally comprise a greater percentage of paper base and a lesser percentage of coating than is conventional. Additionally, to provide increased stiffness and good gloss, the coating contains a small percentage of plastic pigment, advantageously at least 4% and preferably over 7%, and up to 20%. The amount of plastic pigment used can be increased to compensate for the use of lower amounts of mechanical pulp. Plastic pigment is relatively expensive, presently over one dollar a pound. The pigments used may be, for example, #2 clay, delaminated clay, calcined clay, TiO2 and plastic pigment. The coating is generally, but need not be, applied to both sides of the paper web. A sample pigment formulation is 89% delaminated clay, 4% TiO2, and 7% HSP 1055 plastic pigment made by Rohm Haas. This pigment can be made up into a typical coating with the addition of other materials as may include starch, polymeric latex binders and additives as shown below:

			Parts by
		Material	Weight B.D.
	Pigments:	Delaminated Clay	88
		TiO2	5
		HSP 1055 (Plastic Pigment)	7
	Dispersant:	Sodium Polyacrylate	0.1
	Binders:	Starch	5
		SBR Latex	11
	Lubricant:	Diglyceride	0.9
		Water	—
		% Solids	53%

[0029] Generally, the coating can be applied with any conventional type blade coater and preferably with a short dwell time applicator as shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,250,211 and 4,512,279 (FIG. 4), and/or a fountain type coater shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,030 and/or a double bladed coater as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,112,653, the teachings of which patents are incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the coating can be applied by a film coater or Speedcoater applicator made by Voith Sulzer GmbH, such as that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,848,268. While blade doctoring is preferred, other suitable types of metering, such as with a doctor rod, grooved or smooth, could be used. The term blade or blade coater as used herein, unless specifically stated, is understood to include such other equivalent metering techniques. The doctor blade shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,336 has been advantageously used to provide low coat weight.

[0030] The coated paper can then be calendered, preferably hot-soft calendered (FIG. 5A) and/or supercalendered (FIG. 5B), but for supercalendering the nip pressure is less than normal. The hot-soft calendering provide some improvement in bulk over supercalendering at a lower nip pressure. This improvement could be about 5 to 7% greater bulk. For example, a reduced supercalendering nip load gives a bulk factor of 58, while hot-soft calendering on the same coater paper stock at equal gloss (42) gives a bulk factor of 61. Supercalendering equipment useful in the present invention is a 10 nip supercalender made by Voith Sulzer GmbH. When used to supercalender the coated paper of the invention, the nips of the supercalender would be at a loading of only about two-thirds (⅔) of what is conventionally used. For example, supercalender loading may be 800 to 1200 pounds (per lineal inch) with 1100 to 1200 pounds being preferred and about 1150 pounds being the target, instead of the usual 1500 to 2200 pounds. Hot-soft calendering can be carried out under conventional conditions and may also take place on or off the machine. Hot-soft calendering equipment such as shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,124,480, 3,124,504, 3,230,867 or 4,277,524 and/or currently made and offered by Voith Sulzer GmbH as Model No. G30 2/0 may be used. Generally, but not necessarily, supercalendering will take place off machine. However, if apparatus similar to the Janus calender made by Voith-Sulzer GmbH is used, such low nip load calendering could be performed on-line.

[0031] The resultant coated paper will generally have a bulk factor of 57-62% which can be expressed as a function of its total weight as follows: 1$\frac{\mathrm{Caliper}\mathrm{in}\mathrm{mils}\times 1000}{\mathrm{Base}\mathrm{weight}\mathrm{per}\mathrm{ream}}$

[0032] The resultant coated paper will generally have the following characteristics as compared to conventional coated paper of the same weight:

[0033] (1) 10-20% less lineal feet/roll of paper for the same roll diameter, evidencing the higher bulk of the paper;

[0034] (2) lesser weight per roll for the same roll diameter;

[0035] (3) about 10-20% higher caliper;

[0036] (4) about 10-15% higher stiffness;

[0037] (5) about 0.5 to 1.0 pt. or more gain in opacity and brightness; and

[0038] (6) print smoothness and gloss equivalent to conventional paper.

[0039] Some of the parameters contemplated for, and for the making of, the high bulk lightweight coated paper of the invention are:

Basis Weight	32	30	28	26	24
Base Paper Weight	26-28	24-26	22-24	20-22	18-20
Coating Weight	4-6	4-6	4-6	4-6	4-6
Furnish Composition
% MP	55-75	55-75	55-75	55-75	55-75
% SW Kraft	25-45	25-45	25-45	25-45	25-45
% Ash	4-8	4-8	4-8	4-8	4-8
Coating Formula
Part DL Clay	85 ± 7	85 ± 7	85 ± 7	85 ± 7	85 ± 7
Part TiO2	8 ± 4	8 ± 4	8 ± 4	8 ± 4	8 ± 4
Part Plastic Pigment	7 ± 3	7 ± 3	7 ± 3	7 ± 3	7 ± 3
Part Starch	3 ± 3	3 ± 3	3 ± 3	3 ± 3	3 ± 3
Part Latex	12 ± 3	12 ± 3	12 ± 3	12 ± 3	12 ± 3
Base Paper
Kajaani Formation	65-100	65-100	65-100	65-100	65-100
Supercalender
# Nips/side	1-5	1-5	1-5	1-5	1-5
Nip load - pli	1000-1400	1000-1400	1000-1400	1000-1400	1000-1400
Roll Temperature ° F.	16-225	160-225	160-225	160-225	160-225

[0040] While mechanical pulp is preferable, it is contemplated that other pulps could be included, such that a lower percentage of mechanical pulp would be required. Other pulps and proportions thereof contemplated for use are as follows:

	Percentage of	Type of Other	Percentage of Other
	Mechanical Pulp	Pulp	Pulp
	A.	65%	SWK	35%
	B.	60%	SWK/HWK	30%/10%
	C.	60%	SWK/recycled	30%/10%

[0041] While it is preferable to use a gap former, other types of formers, such as twin wire or top wire formers, could instead be used with some small sacrifice in bulk.

[0042] For example, several or many of the above discussed factors could be used in combination to produce high bulk paper.

[0043] Factors effecting high bulk are listed as follows in decreasing order of effectiveness:

[0044] 1. Low supercalender nip load or hot-soft calender;

[0045] 2. Gap former;

[0046] 3. Low coat weight/high substrate weight;

[0047] 4. Plastic pigment in coating;

[0048] 5. High % mechanical pulp;

[0049] 6. High latex/starch ratio binder; and

[0050] 7. Extended nip press (uncertain of the effect at the time of filing).

[0051] Combinations of factors affecting the production of high bulk paper as contemplated by the invention include (1) mechanical pulp, two wire forming, decreased base weight, increased coat weight, plastic pigment, and hot-soft calendering; (2) mechanical pulp, gap forming, increased base weight, decreased coat weight, plastic pigment coating, and supercalendering to a lower loading; (3) mechanical pulp, decreased base weight, two wire forming, extended nip or extended shoe pressing, uncured coat weight, plastic pigment coating, and hot-soft calendering or supercalendering to a lower load.

[0052] For example, the combination of:

[0053] 1. increasing base substrate weight from 24#/3300 ft2 to 26#/3300 ft2;

[0054] 2. increasing mechanical pulp in the base subtract from 52% to 65%;

[0055] 3. decreasing coat weight from 8#/3300 ft2 to 6#/3300 ft2;

[0056] 4. decreasing supercalendering intensity from 1500 pli to 1150 pli; and

[0057] 5. increasing plastic pigment in the coating from 0 parts to 7 parts would increase bulk from 51±1 to 58±1 and increase L&W stiffness from 42±5 to 50±5.

[0058] Conventional 32#, Conventional 34# and High Bulk 32# are compared as follows:

	Conventional	Conventional	High Bulk
Basis Weight #/3,300 ft2	32	34	32
Base Substrate Weight #/	24	25½	26
3,300 ft2
Coat Weight #/3,300 ft2	8	8½	6
Caliper	1.62 ± .04	1.80 ± .04	1.85 ± .04
Bulk Factor	51 ± 1	52 ± 1	58 ± 1
L&W Stiffness	42 ± 5	55 ± 5	60 ± 5

[0059] The invention provides a high bulk lightweight coated paper that is desirable for use in magazines which require very low basis weight to reduce paper costs by increasing printing area per ton of paper and by reducing mailing cost per magazine. High bulk paper will improve the economics of publishing magazines by allowing a lower basis weight to be substituted for a higher basis weight conventional grade.

[0060] In addition, the increased stiffness of the paper of the invention improves paper web rigidity for low basis weight paper which results in better runnability on high speed printing presses and folders used to produce magazines. Further, the thicker paper produces a bulkier magazine which is less flimsy when handled. A bulkier magazine “feels more substantial” i.e., it will not droop or feel limp. Individual pages will separate easier and turn without sticking together.

[0061] FIGS. 6A-6D schematically illustrate these different lightweight coated papers of the prior art, and a lightweight coated paper embodying the present invention, each of which has the same total weight of 30 pounds/rm. The paper of FIG. 6A is conventional lightweight coated paper and has a caliper of 1.6 mils., a base weight of 22 pounds and a coat weight of 4 pounds on each side of the base. The paper of FIG. 6B is also a conventional lightweight coated paper that was earlier made and sold by Consolidated Papers, Inc. and that has a caliper of 1.8 mils, a base weight of 23 pounds and a coat weight of 3.5 pounds on each side of the base. The paper of FIG. 6C is likewise conventional lightweight coated paper and has a caliper of 1.9 mils, a base weight of 24 pounds and a coat weight of 3 pounds on each side of the base. FIG. 6D shows a high bulk lightweight coated paper according to the teachings of the invention, which has a caliper of 2.0 mils, a base weight of 25 pounds and a coat weight of 2.5 pounds on opposite sides of the base.

[0062] It should be understood that the coating can be applied by any of the coaters discussed herein including a film coater or speed coater. As used herein, the term “blade coater” includes such film and/or speed coater.

[0063] The following table compares the effects of hot-soft calendering versus supercalendering of high bulk coated paper of 32 pound weight, where FPM means feet per minute, PLI means pounds per lineal inch, RH means relative humidity, MD means machine direction, W means web side and F means felt side:

Effect of Hot/Soft Calender vs. Super

[0064]

			Hot/Soft
	Sample	Supercalender	Calender
	Identification #	B641122	B641109
	Web Speed - FPM	2000	2500
	Nip Load - PLI	1150	1500
	Temperature - °F.	200°	275°
	Number of Nips/Side	4	2
	Basis Wt. (73°/50% RH)	32.7	32.9
	Coat Wt. W/F	3.1/3.2	3.1/3.2
	Caliper - mils	1.89	2.00
	Bulk Factor	57.7	60.7
	Gloss	42/40	38/40
	Opacity	89.3	90.1
	L&W Stiffness - MD	59	69
	Parker Printsurf	W	1.92	2.23
		F	2.34	2.30
	Heidelberg Print
	Print Gloss	W	54	49
		F	46	52
	Print Density	W	1.36	1.30
		F	1.31	1.31
	Print solid	W	4	5
		F	4	5
	50% Halftone	W	7.7	7.1
		F	6.0	7.2
	Pickouts	W	54	53
		F	52	54

[0065] The following table shows parameters involved in the production of 32 pound lightweight coated having a 75° TAPPI gloss of 45:

	Reels	Control	Trial		95% Conf.
	Significance	Std	/	Trl	Average	Average	Difference	interval
SUPERED TESTS
Basis wt.	**	8	/	4	32.0	31.8	−0.2	±0.2
Callper	***	8	/	4	18.3	18.2	1.9	±0.5
Bulk	***	8	/	4	50.8	57.2	6.4	±1.6
Opacity		8	/	4	88.1	88.0	−0.1	±0.8
Gloss Wire	*	8	/	4	45	43	−2	±2.0
Gloss Felt	*	8	/	4	45	44	−1	±0.9
Print Surf Wire	***	8	/	4	1.5	1.7	0.2	±0.1
Print Surf Felt	***	8	/	4	1.6	1.8	0.2	±0.1
L&W	***	8	/	4	42	47	5	±2.2
HEIDELBERG			/
Ink Density Wire	**	2	/	4	1.44	1.36	−0.08	±0.0
Ink Density Felt	**	2	/	4	1.40	1.36	−0.04	±0.0
Ink Gloss Wire	***	2	/	4	62	54	−8	±2.7
Ink Gloss Felt	***	2	/	4	58	54	−4	±1.6
I.A. 50% Halftone W	*	2	/	4	6	7.8	1.8	±1.6
I.A. 50% Halftone F		2	/	4	6.2	7.3	1.1	±2.4
I.A. 75% Halftone W		2	/	4	5.4	5.8	0.4	±1.6
I.A. 75% Halftone F		2	/	4	5.5	8.4	0.9	±3.4
***Significantly different @ 99% confidence level.
**Significantly different @ 95% confidence level.
*Significantly different @ 90% confidence level.

[0066] The following table shows various average results obtained with 32 pound lightweight coated paper of and made according to the present invention:

	AVERAGE TEST RESULTS
Sample #	970092	970098	970102	9790083
Identification	Control	Trial 1	Trial 2	Trial 3
Reel #	B641122	B6411096	B8411059	B841109
Finte/ft/mg	SPC @ Weight	H/S @ S.P.	H/S @ 3 P	H/S @ Belair
Web Speed	2000	2500	2500	4000	POOLED
Nip Load PLI	1150	1500	1500	1500	STD.
Temperature, ° F.	200	275	325	250	DEV.
Basis Weight (Cond.)	1	32.7	32.9	33.0	33.1
Coat Weight - W	1	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.1
Coat Weight - F	1	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.2
Ash	1	18.0	17.5	17.5	17.4
Callper	8	1.89	2.00	2.02	2.02	0.02
Bulk	8	57.7	60.7	61.2	61.0	0.8
75° Paper Gloss - W*	8	42	38	36	38	1
75° Paper Gloss - F	8	40	40	38	36	1
Brightness - W	2	70.1	68.4	86.8	57.9	0.2
Brightness - F	2	71.5	68.4	67.6	68.1	0.8
Color ‘a’ - W	2	−0.1	−0.1	−0.1	0.0	0.0
Color ‘a’ - F	2	0.2	0.1	0.3	−0.1	0.1
Color ‘b’ - W	2	3.2	4.1	4.8	3.9	0.2
Color ‘b’ - F	2	2.5	3.9	4.3	4.1	0.4
Opacity	8	89.3	90.1	90.4	90.0	0.4
Undertone - W	2	4	4	4	5	0
Undertone - F	2	4	4	4	5	0
Micro. Galv. - W	2	4	4	4	3	0
Micro. Galv. - F	2	4	4	4	3	0
Tensile	8	11.1	10.5	10.8	10.6	0.7
Tear C.D.	4	25.3	25.4	24.6	26.6	0.5
L&W Stiffness	8	59	69	88	87	2
Scott Bond	5	176	177	179	185	8
H.P.D.	8	127	117	101	110	10
Print Surf - W	8	1.92	2.23	2.33	2.72	0.10
Print Surf - F	8	2.34	2.30	2.46	2.48	0.08
Croda Holdout - W	2	60.0	58.5	60.0	59.0	1.1
Croda Holdout - F	2	61.5	60.0	62.0	61.0	1.1
Water Drop - W	2	10	12	12	10	1
Water Drop - F	2	10	11	12	9	1
IGT, #3 @ 3.5 m/s - W	4	88	111	75	116	11
IGT, #3 @ 3.5 m/s - F	4	70	98	102	108	11
Prufbau Dry Pick - W	2	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	0.0
Prufbau Dry Pick - F	2	4.0	4.0	3.0	4.0	0.0
Prufbau Wet Pick - W	1	5.0	5.0	5.0	4.0
Prufbau Wet Pick - F	1	4.0	5.0	4.0	4.0
Adams Wet Rub - W	2	1.1	0.9	1.0	1.0	0.2
Adams Wet Rub - F	2	1.6	1.0	1.2	1.1	0.1
Sutherland Rub - W	2	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	0.0
Sutherland Rub - F	2	4.0	4.0	3.5	4.0	0.0
VC Absorbency - W	4	89	91	96	90	4
VC Absorbency - F	4	91	94	91	91	2
Heidelberg Halftone - W	1	8	5	6	4
Heidelberg Halftone - F	1	4	5	5	4
Heidelberg Solid - W	1	4	5	8	4
Heidelberg Solid - F	1	4	5	5	7
Heidelberg 50% Halftone - W	3	7.7	7.1	8.7	8.1	0.3
Heidelberg 50% Halftone - F	3	8.0	7.2	8.2	8.9	0.5
Heidelberg 75% Halftone - W	3	2.7	4.3	4.8	1.8	1.5
Heidelberg 75% Halftone - F	3	2.9	5.9	5.4	2.7	1.5
Heidelberg Ink Gloss - W	1	54	49	48	48
Heidelberg Ink Gloss - F	1	46	52	50	44
Heidelberg Ink Density - W	1	1.38	1.30	1.33	1.33
Heidelberg Ink Density - F	1	1.31	1.31	1.32	1.30
Heidelberg Coating Pick - W	1	25	33	38	34
Heidelberg Coating Pick - F	1	28	38	42	35
Heidelberg Total Picks - W	1	54	53	54	53
Heidelberg Total Picks - F	1	52	54	51	50

[0067] The present invention is usable in conjunction with papers for web offset, rotogravure, flexographic, letterpress and others.

[0068] As used herein the term lightcoat weight refers to papers of 30-40 pounds per ream and ultra light coat weight refers to papers of 24-28 pounds per ream. The present invention contemplates producing lightweight coated paper of high bulk with a gloss of 40 or above, and in fact Consolidated Papers, Inc. has achieved a gloss of 45. For ultra lightweight coated papers of high bulk, the present invention contemplates a gloss of 35.

[0069] While embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, various modifications and other embodiments thereof may be devised by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.

Claims

1. A papermaking apparatus for making a lightweight high bulk coated paper web from a waterborne furnish containing at least 50% mechanical pulp, comprising gap former section means for extruding the furnish and forming the paper web from said furnish, press section means for removing water from the formed paper web, dryer means for drying the paper web to less than 10% moisture content, coater means for applying a coating to the paper web, and means for calendering the coated paper web to a finished caliper greater than the caliper of conventional paper of the same weight and a 75° TAPPI gloss of 40 or greater, whereby the coated paper web formed is of high bulk in relation to its light weight with a good gloss.

2. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 1, wherein said press section means further comprises extended nip press means for densifying the paper web less than would conventional press means.

3. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 1, wherein said calender means comprises hot-soft calender means for hot-soft calendering the coated paper web.

4. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 1, wherein said calender means comprises supercalender means for supercalendering the coated paper web at a supercalender nip loading that is substantially less than conventional supercalender nip loading.

5. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 1, wherein said coater means comprises a blade coater for applying light coat weight to the paper web.

6. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 5, wherein said blade coater is a single blade coater.

7. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 5, wherein said blade coater is a double blade coater.

8. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 6, wherein said blade coater is a short dwell time applicator.

9. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 6, wherein said blade coater is a fountain coater.

10. A papermalling apparatus as in claim 5, wherein said coater includes a first blade coater with its own blade and a second blade spaced downstream from said first blade coater.

11. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said first blade coater is a short dwell time applicator.

12. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 5, further comprising a second blade coater, the first blade coater operating on one side of the paper web and the second blade coater operating on the other side of the paper web.

13. A process for making lightweight high bulk coated paper comprising the steps of: providing a waterborne furnish comprising at least 50% mechanical pulp; forming a paper web by extruding the furnish onto wire sides of a papermaking apparatus with a gap former; pressing excess water from the paper web to provide a paper web of a caliper that is substantially greater than that of a conventional paper web of the same total weight; drying the paper web to a moisture content of less than 10%; coating the paper web with a coating weight that is substantially less than that applied to conventional coated paper of the same total weight; and calendering the coated paper web to a caliper greater than the caliper of conventional coated paper of the same total weight, and to a 75° TAPPI gloss of 40 or greater; whereby a lightweight coated paper is produced with a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40 and with a greater paper base caliper and lesser coating caliper than for conventional coated paper of the same total weight.

14. A process as in claim 13, wherein said pressing step includes the step of densifying the paper web with an extended nip press.

15. A process as in claim 13, wherein said calendering step includes the step of hot-soft calendering the coated paper web.

16. A process as in claim 13, wherein said calendering step includes the step of supercalendering the paper web at a supercalender nip loading that is substantially less than nip loading used in conventional supercalendering of conventional coated paper of the same weight.

17. A process as in claim 16, wherein said supercalendering step is carried out at a nip loading of about two-thirds of that for conventional supercalendering of conventional coated paper of the same weight.

18. A process as in claim 13, wherein the coated paper produced has about 10 to 20% greater caliper than a conventional coated paper of a same weight.

19. A process as in claim 13, wherein said step of forming the paper web includes forming a base having a weight of about 24 to 34 pounds per ream.

20. A process as in claim 13, wherein said step of coating the paper web includes applying a coat weight of 3 or less pounds per ream on a side of the paper web.

21. A process as in claim 13, wherein said forming step includes forming a base having a caliper of at least about 88% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

22. A process as in claim 21, wherein said coating step includes applying to a side of the web coating that is no more than about 6% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

23. A process as in claim 21, wherein said coating step includes applying to each of the two sides of the web coating that in total is no more than about 12% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

24. A process as in claim 23, wherein said coating step includes applying to the paper web a coating that is not in excess of about 12% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

25. A process as in claim 24, wherein said coating step includes applying about one-half of the coating to each side of the paper web.

26. A process as in claim 24, wherein said forming step provides the balance of the percentage of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

27. A process as in claim 13, wherein said coating step includes coating the paper web with a coating containing plastic pigment.

28. A process as in claim 27, wherein said calendering step includes calendering the paper to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

29. A process as in claim 13, where said step of coating the paper web includes applying coating having a weight of about 4 to 6 pounds per ream.

30. A process as in claim 13, wherein said steps of forming and coating include forming a base that comprises about 75 to 85% by weight of the total weight of the coated paper and applying a coating to the base that comprises about 25 to 15% by weight of the total weight of the coated paper.

31. A process as in claim 30, wherein said forming and coating steps include forming a base that comprises about 80 to 85% by weight, and applying a coating to the base that comprises about 20 to 15% by weight, of the total weight of the coated paper.

32. A lightweight high bulk coated paper with a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40, comprising a paper base of a weight of 24 to 34 pounds per ream, a coating containing a plastic pigment on each side of said base, said coating being of a weight of no more than 3 pounds per ream per side, said base having a caliper of at least about 88% of the total caliper of said coated paper and said coating providing substantially the remainder of said caliper of said coated paper, said coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

33. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said plastic pigment of said coating is at least 4 parts per 100 parts pigment of said coating.

34. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said base comprises about 75 to 85% by weight, and said coating comprises about 25 to 15% by weight, of the total weight of said coated paper.

35. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coating weight on at least one side of said web comprises about 1.5 to 3 pounds per ream.

36. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coating is applied in substantially equal weights on each side of said base.

37. A paper as in claim 32, wherein base comprises at least 55% mechanical pulp.

38. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said base is a gap formed base.

39. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said base is an extended nip pressed base.

40. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coated paper is a supercalendered coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

41. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coated paper is a coated paper that has been supercalendered at about two-thirds conventional supercalendering nip loads.

42. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coated paper is a hot-soft calendered coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

43. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coated paper has a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 45.

44. A paper as in claim 32, wherein said coated paper is a coated paper that has been calendered to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 45.

45. A papermaking apparatus for making an ultralightweight high bulk coated paper web from a waterborne furnish containing at least 50% mechanical pulp, comprising gap former section means for extruding the furnish and forming the paper web from said furnish, press section means for removing water from the formed paper web, dryer means for drying the paper web to less than 10% moisture content, coater means for applying a coating to the paper web, and means for calendering the coated paper web to a finished caliper greater than the caliper of conventional paper of the same weight and to a 75° TAPPI gloss of 35, whereby the coated paper web formed is of high bulk in relation to its ultralightweight with a good gloss for its weight.

46. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 45, wherein said press section means further comprises wide nip press means for densifying the paper web less than would conventional press means.

47. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 45, wherein said calender means comprises hot-soft calender means for hot-soft calendering the coated paper web.

48. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 45, wherein said calender means comprises supercalender means for supercalendering the coated paper web at a supercalender nip loading that is substantially less than conventional supercalender nip loading.

49. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 45, wherein said coater means comprises a blade coater for applying light coat weight to the paper web.

50. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 49, wherein said blade coater is a single blade coater.

51. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 49, wherein said blade coater is a double blade coater.

52. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 50, wherein said blade coater is a short dwell time applicator.

53. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 50, wherein said blade coater is a fountain coater.

54. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 49, wherein said coater includes a first blade coater with its own blade and a second blade spaced downstream from said first blade coater.

55. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 54, wherein said first blade coater is a short dwell time applicator.

56. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 49, further comprising a second blade coater, the first blade coater operating on one side of the paper web and the second blade coater operating on the other side of the paper web.

57. A process for making ultralightweight high bulk coated paper comprising the steps of: providing a waterborne furnish comprising at least 50% mechanical pulp; forming a paper web by extruding the furnish onto wire sides of a papermaking apparatus with a gap former; pressing excess water from the paper web to provide a paper web of a caliper that is substantially greater than that of a conventional paper web of the same total weight; drying the paper web to a moisture content of less than 10%; coating the paper web with a coating weight that is substantially less than that applied to conventional coated paper of the same total weight; and calendering the coated paper web to a caliper greater than the caliper of conventional coated paper of the same total weight, and to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35. whereby an ultralightweight coated paper is produced with a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35 and with a greater paper base caliper and lesser coating caliper than for conventional coated paper of the same total weight.

58. A process as in claim 57, wherein said pressing step includes the step of densifying the paper web with an extended nip press.

59. A process as in claim 57, wherein said calendering step includes the step of hot-soft calendering the coated paper web.

60. A process as in claim 57, wherein said calendering step includes the step of supercalendering the paper web at a supercalender nip loading that is substantially less than nip loading used in conventional supercalendering of conventional coated paper of the same weight.

61. A process as in claim 60, wherein said supercalendering step is carried out at a nip loading of about two-thirds of that for conventional supercalendering of conventional coated paper of the same weight.

62. A process as in claim 57, wherein the coated paper produced has about 10 to 20% greater caliper than a conventional coated paper of a same weight.

63. A process as in claim 57, wherein said step of forming the paper web includes forming a base having a weight of about 18 to less than 24 pounds per ream.

64. A process as in claim 57, wherein said step of coating the paper web includes applying a coat weight of 2 or less pounds per ream on a side of the paper web.

65. A process as in claim 57, wherein said forming step includes forming a base having a caliper of at least about 88% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

66. A process as in claim 65, wherein said coating step includes applying to a side of the web coating that is no more than about 6% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

67. A process as in claim 65, wherein said coating step includes applying to each of the two sides of the web coating that in total is no more than about 12% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

68. A process as in claim 57, wherein said coating step includes applying to the paper web a coating that is not in excess of about 12% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

69. A process as in claim 68, wherein said coating step includes applying about one-half of the coating to each side of the paper web.

70. A process as in claim 68, wherein said forming step provides the balance of the percentage of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

71. A process as in claim 57, wherein said coating step includes coating the paper web with a coating containing plastic pigment.

72. A process as in claim 61, wherein said calendering step includes calendering the paper to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35.

73. A process as in claim 57, where said step of coating the paper web includes applying coating having a weight of about 18 to less than 24 pounds per ream.

74. A process as in claim 57, wherein said steps of forming and coating include forming a base that comprises about 75 to 85% by weight of the total weight of the coated paper and applying a coating to the base that comprises about 25 to 15% by weight of the total weight of the coated paper.

75. A process as in claim 57, wherein said forming and coating steps include forming a base that comprises about 80 to 85% by weight, and applying a coating to the base that comprises about 20 to 15% by weight, of the total weight of the coated paper.

76. An ultralightweight high bulk coated paper with a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35, comprising a paper base of a weight of 18 to less than 24 pounds per ream, a coating containing a plastic pigment on each side of said base, said coating being of a weight of no more than 2 pounds per ream per side, said base having a caliper of at least about 88% of the total caliper of said coated paper and said coating providing substantially the remainder of said caliper of said coated paper, said coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35.

77. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said plastic pigment of said coating is at least 4 parts per 100 parts pigment of said coating.

78. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said base comprises about 75 to 85% by weight, and said coating comprises about 25 to 15% by weight, of the total weight of said coated paper.

79. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coating weight on at least one side of said web comprises about 1.0 to 2.0 pounds per ream.

80. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coating is applied in substantially equal weights on each side of said base.

81. A paper as in claim 76, wherein base comprises at least 55% mechanical pulp.

82. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said base is a gap formed base.

83. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coater paper is a supercalendered coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35.

84. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coated paper is a coated paper that has been supercalendered at about two-thirds conventional supercalendering nip loads.

85. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coated paper is a hot-soft calendered coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 35.

86. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coated paper has a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

87. A paper as in claim 76, wherein said coated paper is a coated paper that has been calendered to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

88. A papermaking apparatus for making high bulk coated paper web from a waterborne furnish containing at least 50% mechanical pulp, comprising double wire former section means for extruding the furnish and forming the paper web from said furnish, extended nip press section means for removing water from the formed paper web, dryer means for drying the paper web to less than 10% moisture content, coater means for applying a coating to the paper web, and means for hot-soft calendering the coated paper web to a finished caliper greater than the caliper of conventional paper of the same weight and to a 75° TAPPI gloss of 40 or greater, whereby the coated paper web formed is of high bulk in relation to its light weight with a good gloss.

89. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 88, wherein said coater means comprises a blade coater for applying light coat weight to the paper web.

90. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 89, wherein said blade coater is a single blade coater.

91. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 89, wherein said blade coater is a double blade coater.

92. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 90, wherein said blade coater is a short dwell time applicator.

93. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 90, wherein said blade coater is a fountain coater.

94. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 89, wherein said coater includes a first blade coater with its own blade and a second blade spaced downstream from said first blade coater.

95. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 94, wherein said first blade coater is a short dwell time applicator.

96. A papermaking apparatus as in claim 89, further comprising a second blade coater, the first blade coater operating on one side of the paper web and the second blade coater operating on the other side of the paper web.

97. A process for making high bulk coated paper comprising the steps of: providing a waterborne furnish comprising at least 50% mechanical pulp; forming a paper web by extruding the furnish onto wire sides of a papermaking apparatus with a double wire former; pressing excess water from the paper web with an extended nip press to provide a paper web of a caliper that is substantially greater than that of a conventional paper web of the same total weight; drying the paper web to a moisture content of less than 10%; coating the paper web with a coating weight that is substantially less than that applied to conventional coated paper of the same total weight; and hot-soft calendering the coated paper web to a caliper greater than the caliper of conventional coated paper of the same total weight, and to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40; whereby a coated paper is produced with a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40 and with a greater paper base caliper and lesser coating caliper than for conventional coated paper of the same total weight.

98. A process as in claim 97, wherein the coated paper produced has about 10 to 20% greater caliper than a conventional coated paper of a same weight.

99. A process as in claim 97, wherein said step of forming the paper web includes forming a base having a weight of about 18 to 40 pounds per ream.

100. A process as in claim 97, wherein said step of coating the paper web includes applying a coat weight of 3 or less pounds per ream on a side of the paper web.

101. A process as in claim 97, wherein said forming step includes forming a base having a caliper of at least about 88% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

102. A process as in claim 101, wherein said coating step includes applying to a side of the web coating that is no more than about 6% of the total caliper of the finished coated paper.

103. A process as in claim 97, wherein said coating step includes applying about one-half of the coating to each side of the paper web.

104. A process as in claim 97, wherein said coating step includes coating the paper web with a coating containing plastic pigment.

105. A process as in claim 97, where said step of forming the paper web includes forming a base having a weight of about 18 to 34 pounds per ream.

106. A process as in claim 97, wherein said steps of forming and coating include forming a base that comprises about 75 to 85% by weight of the total weight of the coated paper and applying a coating to the base that comprises about 25 to 15% by weight of the total weight of the coated paper.

107. A process as in claim 97, wherein said forming and coating steps include forming a base that comprises about 80 to 85% by weight, and applying a coating to the base that comprises about 20 to 15% by weight, of the total weight of the coated paper.

108. A high bulk coated paper with a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40, comprising a paper base of a weight of 18 to 34 pounds per ream, a coating containing a plastic pigment on each side of said base, said coating being of a weight of no more than 3 pounds per ream per side, said base having a caliper of at least about 88% of the total caliper of said coated paper and said coating providing substantially the remainder of said caliper of said coated paper, said coated paper having a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

109. A paper as in claim 108, wherein said plastic pigment of said coating is at least 4 parts per 100 parts pigment of said coating.

110. A paper as in claim 108, wherein said base comprises about 75 to 85% by weight, and said coating comprises about 25 to 15% by weight, of the total weight of said finished coated paper.

111. A paper as in claim 108, wherein said coating weight on at least one side of said web comprises about 1.0 to 3 pounds per ream.

112. A paper as in claim 111, wherein said coating is applied in substantially equal weights on each side of said base.

113. A paper as in claim 108, wherein base comprises at least 55% mechanical pulp.

114. A paper as in claim 108, wherein said coated paper has a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 40.

115. A paper as in claim 108, wherein said coated paper is a coated paper that has been calendered to a 75° TAPPI gloss of at least 45.