The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/827,610 filed on Apr. 1, 2019, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates generally to above-ground floor systems, and, more specifically, to an above-ground sound attenuating floor system for reducing the transmission of impact sound while maintaining the flexural strength of the flooring system.
In multi-storied buildings, it is desirable to insert a sound attenuating mat into the above-ground floor systems to reduce the transmission of impact sound. Typically, these floor systems utilize three layers: subfloor, overlayment, and flooring, as well as the other structural features and finishes of the building. In this typical application, the overlayment's flexural strength provides the primary protection from an impact failure in the system. However, the insertion of a sound attenuating mat significantly weakens the flexural strength of the flooring system because the sound attenuating mat separates the overlayment from the subfloor, and the matted material has significantly lower compressive and flexural strength, i.e., the matted material has a significantly weaker resistance to deformation under load. In these systems, a thicker application of overlayment is required to maintain the flexural strength of the flooring system to prevent an unacceptable movement causing a floor failure. In flooring systems consisting of a subfloor supported by joists and including the typical sound attenuating mat, the overlayment will normally have a thickness between 0.75″ and 1.5″. This disclosure describes a sound attenuating flooring system that provides sound attenuation while substantially preserving the flexural strength in the integrity of the flooring system, thereby eliminating the need for thicker applications of overlayment in order to provide the desired flexural strength.
The present invention provides a sound attenuating flooring system which overcomes the deficiencies described above, and has other advantages.
In one embodiment, a sound attenuating flooring system is provided. The sound attenuating flooring system comprises a subfloor, a sound attenuating material, and an overlayment. The sound attenuating material overlays and contacts a portion of the subfloor. The sound attenuating material includes a first surface and a second surface. The first surface is defined by a plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions. The second surface is defined by a plurality of open recesses corresponding to the plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions. The overlayment overlays the second surface of the sound attenuating material and fills the open recesses.
In some embodiments, the sound attenuating flooring system is characterized by the plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions extending outward by about 0.125 inch to about 0.75 inch. Such embodiments are further characterized by the sound attenuating flooring system supporting between about 10,000 pounds per square foot and about 35,000 pounds per square foot without flexing more than about 0.06 inch.
In some embodiments, the sound attenuating flooring system is characterized by the plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions extending outward by about 0.125 inch to about 0.75 inch. Such embodiments are further characterized by the sound attenuating flooring system supporting between about 10,000 pounds per square foot and about 35,000 pounds per square foot without flexing more than about 0.04 inch.
In additional embodiments, the sound attenuating flooring system further comprises an underlayment located between the subfloor and the sound attenuating material. In other embodiments, the underlayment has a plurality of holes corresponding to the plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions such that the plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions pass through the underlayment and contact the subfloor.
The drawings included with this application illustrate certain aspects of the embodiments described herein. However, the drawings should not be viewed as exclusive embodiments. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modifications, alterations, combinations, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the art with the benefit of this disclosure.
The present disclosure may be understood more readily by reference to these detailed descriptions. For simplicity and clarity of illustration, where appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the different figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements. In addition, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments described herein. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments described herein can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the related relevant feature being described. Also, the description is not to be considered as limiting the scope of the embodiments described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale and the proportions of certain parts have been exaggerated to better illustrate details and features of the present disclosure.
As shown by
With reference to
Sound attenuating material 30 includes a first surface 32a and a second surface 32b. First surface 32a is defined by a plurality of outwardly projecting hollow protrusions 34a. Second surface 32b is defined by a plurality of open recesses 34b which correspond to hollow protrusions 34a. The generally flat surfaces 31 between hollow protrusions 34a and open recesses 34b define a plane 35.
Typically, hollow protrusions 34a extend outwardly from plane 35 about 0.125 inch to about 0.75 inch. More typically, hollow protrusions 34a extend outwardly from plane 35 about 0.125 inch to about 0.5 inch. Even more typically, hollow protrusions extend outwardly from plane 35 about 0.125 inch to about 0.375 inch, and, in some embodiments, about 0.125 inch to about 0.1875 inch. For the purposes of this disclosure, the distance hollow protrusion 34a extends outward from plane 35 is also referred to as the length of hollow protrusion 34a.
Sound attenuating material 30 may have from about 1 and about 50 hollow protrusions 34a per square inch. More typically, the density of hollow protrusions 34a is from about 4 to about 50 hollow protrusions 34a per square inch of sound attenuating material 30. For example, in some embodiments, sound attenuating material 30 has 16 hollow protrusions 34a per square inch. In other embodiments, sound attenuating material 30 has 25 protrusions 34a per square inch.
Hollow protrusions 34a include a tip 36. Upon installation of sound attenuating material 30, tip 36 contacts subfloor 20. Tip 36 may be defined as a pointed surface or a flat, conical, or rounded surface. In some embodiments, tip 36 has a flat surface in the form of a geometric shape. For example, as shown in
The generally flat surfaces 31 between hollow protrusions 34a and open recesses 34b typically have a thickness of about 0.002 inch to about 0.1 inch. More typically, flat surfaces 31 have a thickness of 0.006 inch. One skilled in the art will understand that the thickness of flat surfaces 31 depends on the tensile strength, elasticity, and flexibility of sound attenuating material 30.
Overlayment 40 overlays second surface 32b of sound attenuating material 30. When poured as a slurry over sound attenuating material 30, overlayment 40 flows into open recesses 34b of sound attenuating material 30. The combination of overlayment 40 and sound attenuating material 30 allows for a near-direct contact between overlayment 40 and subfloor 20. Only the thickness of sound attenuating material 30 at tips 36 and airgaps 38 separate overlayment 40 from subfloor 20. Typically, the filling of recesses 34b ensures that between about 5% and about 35% of overlayment 40 is in near-direct contact with subfloor 20. More typically, about 25% of overlayment 40 is in near-direct contact with subfloor 20. Thus, as used herein, the term near-direct contact refers to the length of hollow protrusions 34a. As an added benefit of using sound attenuating material 30, upon application of overlayment 40 to sound attenuating material 30, the resulting cured overlayment 40 has a relatively uniform plane. Overlayment 40 may be a cement material, gypsum, portland, fly ash, or any other material of similar structure upon curing. One skilled in the art will understand overlayment 40 is a flowable grout material, a cement or other similar flooring material, capable of filling hollow protrusions 34a.
Formation of overlayment 40 on sound attenuating material 30 preserves the flexural strength of sound attenuating flooring system 10 while minimizing the thickness of overlayment 40. For example, when subfloor 20 is wooden and supported by floor joists, cement overlayment 40 will normally require a thickness from 0.75″ to 1.5″ to provide the desired flexural strength. However, due to the cooperation of sound attenuating material 30 with overlayment 40, the thickness of overlayment 40 used over a wood subfloor 20 supported by joists can be reduced to a thickness of 0.25 inch or less of cement overlayment 40. Typically, in sound attenuating flooring system 10, overlayment 40 has a thickness of about 0.25 inch to about 0.7 inch.
Typically, sound attenuating flooring system 10 has sufficient vertical rigidity to support between about 10,000 pounds per square foot and about 35,000 pounds per square foot without flexing more than about 0.06 inch. More typically, sound attenuating flooring system 10 has sufficient vertical rigidity to support between about 10,000 pounds per square foot and about 35,000 pounds per square foot without flexing more than about 0.04 inch. For example, in some embodiments, sound attenuating flooring system 10 has sufficient rigidity to support about 33,000 pounds per square foot without flexing more than 0.04 inch. Accordingly, sound attenuating flooring system 10 allows for sound attenuation while also substantially preserving the flexural strength in the integrity of the sound attenuating flooring system 10.
As depicted in
With reference to
The tests were carried out on three samples of each material. The average result for each material is reported in the tables shown in
Under the testing conditions, a subfloor was omitted. However, the test results provide a clear indication of the compressive strength of the tested materials. The results depicted in the tables of
With reference to
Testing was carried out with the following configuration (bottom up): a single layer of 0.625 fire rated gypsum board, a metal resilient channel, an 18 inch wood truss joist spaced 24 inch on center, a 4 inch batt fiberglass insulation loose laid in the cavity, 0.75 inch oriented strand board panels as the subfloor, then either no sound attenuating material, sound attenuating material 30, or sound attenuating material with a 3 mm fibrous mat between sound attenuating material 30 and the subfloor, a gypsum layer, and the finished floor covering. Under the testing conditions, the results in the table of
For example, as shown in the table of
Sound attenuating flooring system 10 may optionally include an underlayment 50. Underlayment 50 further improves the sound attenuation ability of sound attenuating flooring system 10 by providing an additional sound attenuating barrier. As depicted in
Assembly of sound attenuating flooring system 10 includes the steps of: installing subfloor 20; placing sound attenuating material 30 on subfloor 20 such that tips 36 of hollow protrusions 34a contact subfloor 20; and pouring overlayment 40 on sound attenuating material 30. The application of the overlayment 40 should be at a rate such that overlayment 40 flows into and substantially fills all open recesses 34b of sound attenuating material 30. Optionally, during assembly of sound attenuating flooring system 10, underlayment 50 will either be adhered to sound attenuating material 30 or placed on subfloor 20 prior to placement of sound attenuating material 30 on subfloor 20.
As depicted in
As a further benefit, use of sound attenuating material 30 with hollow protrusions 34a reduces the volume of overlayment 40 necessary for sound attenuating flooring system 10 while maintaining the structural rigidity of sound attenuating flooring system 10. Typically, the thickness of overlayment 40 is about 0.25 inch to about 0.7 inch. In general, the reduced volume of overlayment 40 will correspond to the volume displaced by airgaps 38. Thus, use of sound attenuating material 30 provides sound attenuation without detrimentally impacting the flexural strength of sound attenuating flooring system 10. Accordingly, the sound attenuating flooring system 10 does not require an increased volume of overlayment 40 when using sound attenuating material 30. The vertical flexural strength of the combination of subfloor 20, sound attenuating material 30, and overlayment 40 provide the ability to maintain structural rigidity without increasing the volume or thickness of overlayment 40.
Hollow protrusions 34a in sound attenuating material 30 also offer an advantage in installation over prior sound attenuating materials. Adjacent sections of sound attenuating material 30 may overlap such that hollow protrusions 34a of one section nest in recesses 34b of an adjacent section. Preferably, the nesting of hollow protrusions 34a in recesses 34b provides a snap for confirmation that hollow protrusions 34a are nested in recesses 34b.
Although the disclosed invention has been shown and described in detail with respect to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in the form and detailed area may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention as claimed. Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the object and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2956785 | Richl | Oct 1960 | A |
3597891 | Martin | Aug 1971 | A |
4640854 | Radtke | Feb 1987 | A |
4956951 | Kannankeril | Sep 1990 | A |
5052161 | Whitacre | Oct 1991 | A |
5082712 | Starp | Jan 1992 | A |
5619832 | Myrvold | Apr 1997 | A |
6094878 | Schluter | Aug 2000 | A |
6213252 | Ducharme | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6939599 | Clark | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7021017 | Herron | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7536835 | Schluter | May 2009 | B2 |
7585556 | Julton | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8146310 | Keene | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8528286 | Keene | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8695300 | Hartl | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9016018 | Boyle | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9157231 | Wingfield | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9328520 | Kriser | May 2016 | B1 |
9625163 | Larson | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20030154676 | Schwartz | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050158517 | Rives | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050229520 | Julton | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060230699 | Keene | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070056237 | Kang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080236097 | Tinianov | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080295441 | Carolan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090230113 | Batori | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100282539 | Cais | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100319286 | Becker | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130011609 | Comitale | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140069039 | Schluter | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20170292278 | Gutjahr | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180073254 | Hainbach | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180202150 | Downey | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180223543 | Faotto | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20200308850 | Igo | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2020100002963 | Mar 2010 | KR |
101181696 | Sep 2012 | KR |
20140134051 | Nov 2014 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of KR 10-1181696, Espacenet, accessed Sep. 29, 2022 (Year: 2022). |
“ThermalDry Insulated Floor Decking”, Basement Systems, Oct. 14, 2017, accessed via Web Archive, https://web.archive.org/web/20171014021853/https://www.basementsystems.com/basement-finishing/basement-flooring/insulated-subfloor.html (Year: 2017). |
“Why All-Foam Basement Subfloors Make Sense”, Dricore, accessed Sep. 29, 2022 (Year: 2022). |
“subfloor” definition, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, accessed Sep. 29, 2022, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subfloor (Year: 2022). |
Formulated Materials, Treadstone M2 Sound Attenuating Mat, Technical Data Sheet, Mar. 27, 2019, pp. 1-3. |
Formulated Materials, Treadstone R2 Sound Attenuating Mat, Technical Data Sheet, Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-3. |
Formulated Materials, Treadstone R1 Sound Attenuating Mat, Technical Data Sheet, Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-3. |
Formulated Materials, Treadstone M3 Sound Attenuating Mat, Technical Data Sheet, Mar. 27, 2019, pp. 1-3. |
Canadian Office Action received in corresponding Canadian Application No. 3,077,825 dated Apr. 22, 2021, pp. 1-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200308850 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62827610 | Apr 2019 | US |