The present invention relates to projector systems and, particularly, to improved prisms systems for laser-based image projection systems.
Projector systems are now being architected with improvements in dynamic range. Many of these types of improvements are in the area of laser projection systems. Some such laser projection systems may also comprise dual and multi-modulator projector display systems. It may be desirable to improve the performance of these improved image projection systems.
Conventional high performance Digital Light Processing (DLP) projectors use a three-channel prism assembly having a common light path bi-directionally through the color prism where white light is split into red, green, and blue and then re-combined into a full-color (white light) image. After splitting the input white light into three colors, the colors are individually modulated by dedicated DLP chips and sent back through the same color prism to re-combine the modulated light into a full color image.
Examples of such conventional prisms may be found in:
In many embodiments of prism assemblies for projector display systems herein, the prism inputs are discrete color channels (e.g., red, green and blue channels)—as opposed to the white light input of the conventional prism assembly as described, but the modulated light may be still combined in a similar manner. This may be desirable for a number of reasons. First, “off state” light from the red, green, and blue DLP modulation is reflected away from on-state light paths within the prism, tending to avoid uncontrolled scatter. Second, the re-combination of light may be done with a Philips-style prism (as in the related patent below), but with significantly simplified coatings, allowed by the narrow-band, uni-directional discrete red/green/blue illumination sources used with this prism. Third, by keeping the colors separate for much of the prism path length, power levels may be significantly reduced at typical failure points. This allows more optical power handling capability in the prism. And finally, light efficiency may be increased significantly when using discrete light sources like LEDs and lasers by removal of the additional red, green, and blue separation and re-combination losses usually found in typical three-channel prism designs. In general, many embodiments herein optimize individual light paths to minimize scattering, losses, and thermal loads in order to provide improved efficiency, contrast, and power handling in a 3-chip DLP projector.
Coating optimization may be done to AR coatings and dichroic coatings that combine the light. The AR coatings on the input legs can be optimized per color (e.g., since each leg may see a single color) and angle (assuming higher f/# PSF relay is used). This optimization can result in better transmission (˜0.2% per surface, with 7 surfaces in each discrete path). The dichroic coatings can be optimized for narrowband light (assuming non-lamp source) which can have improved reflectance and transmission compared to broader band coatings, and also optimized for narrower angles (will vary depending on narrow band wavelength choices). Improvements in the dichroic coatings can also be critical to contrast ratio since light control is critical there and unintended reflections could reduce contrast. In other embodiments, this design may also be applied to single-chip DLP projector with monochromatic or color sequential operation. A dichroic coating is an optical coating designed to reflect a portion of light (e.g., a range of wavelengths) and transmit another portion of the light (e.g., another range of wavelengths).
In many embodiments, prisms are capable of receiving discrete illumination inputs (e.g. which may tend to aid efficiency) from discrete color laser sources. In addition, many embodiments may tend to perform well with high power and tend to reduce heat load and thermal stresses to improve power handling and reliability
In one embodiment, a prism assembly for an image projector display systems is disclosed, comprising: a plurality of discrete color light input; for each discrete color light input, a prism element to receive the discrete color light input; and wherein further the heating load for each said prism element is less than the if the prism element received full spectrum illumination.
Other features and advantages of the present system are presented below in the Detailed Description when read in connection with the drawings presented within this application.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
As utilized herein, terms “component,” “system,” “interface,” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, software (e.g., in execution), and/or firmware. For example, a component can be a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components can reside within a process and a component can be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. A component may also be intended to refer to a communications-related entity, either hardware, software (e.g., in execution), and/or firmware and may further comprise sufficient wired or wireless hardware to affect communications.
Throughout the following description, specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding to persons skilled in the art. However, well known elements may not have been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the disclosure. Accordingly, the description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.
In the field of projector and other display systems, it is desirable to improve both image rendering performance and system efficiency. Several embodiments of the present application describe systems, method and techniques to affect these improvements by employing light field modeling for dual, or multi-modulation display systems. In one embodiment, light source models are developed and used to advantageous effect. Camera pictures of displayed images of known input images may be evaluated to improve light models. In some embodiments, an iterative process may accumulate improvements. In some embodiments, these techniques may be used on moving images to make live adjustments to improve image rendering performance.
Dual modulation projector and display systems have been described in commonly-owned patents and patent applications, including:
Light 104 may illuminate a first modulator 106 that may, in turn, illuminate a second modulator 110, via a set of optional optical components 108. Light from second modulator 110 may be projected by a projection lens 112 (or other suitable optical components) to form a final projected image upon a screen 114. First and second modulators may be controlled by a controller 116—which may receive input image and/or video data. Controller 116 may perform certain image processing algorithms, gamut mapping algorithms or other such suitable processing upon the input image/video data and output control/data signals to first and second modulators in order to achieve a desired final projected image 114. In addition, in some projector systems, it may be possible, depending on the light source, to modulate light source 102 (control line not shown) in order to achieve additional control of the image quality of the final projected image.
Light recycling module 103 is depicted in
While the embodiment of
It should also be appreciated that—even though
First modulator 221 may comprise a number of prisms 218a, 218b and a reflector 220. Reflector 220 may comprise a Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) array of reflectors, or a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) array—or any other suitable set of reflectors possible that may reflect light in at least two or more paths. One such path is depicted in
However, at certain time during the rendering of the final projected image, the full power/energy of the light source 102 may not be needed. If it is not possible to modulate the power of light source 102, then it may be desired to recycle the light from light source 102. Additionally, it may be desired to increase the brightness of “highlights” in an image—and light recycled in the projector system may provide additional power. In such a case, and as may be seen in
In another embodiment, a third optional path (not shown) allows the reflectors to direct light from the light source to a light “dump”—i.e., a portion of the projector system where the light is absorbed. In this case, the light is wasted as heat to be dissipated from the projector system. Thus, the projector system may have multiple degrees of freedom when it comes to directing the light as desired.
After first modulation, light may be transmitted through a third optical subsystem/Point Spread Function (PSF) relay 318 prior to input into a second modulator 320—which modulates the light for transmission through a projector optical subsystem 322 to project a final image for viewing. In continued reference to
As discussed herein in the context of one embodiment, it may be desirable for the first modulator/pre-modulator to produce a blurred and/or de-focused image based upon image data values, e.g., such as a halftone image. In many embodiments, it may be desirable to have a relay optical system that tends to produce a uniformly blurred/de-focused image from the pre-modulator to the primary modulator. In addition, it may be desirable to have a desired, defocused spot shape for this embodiment.
In many embodiments, the relay optical system may comprise lenses or other optical elements that effectively moves the focal plane, corrects for any coma, and adjusts the spread (e.g., by creating defocus/blur and adding spherical aberration to some desired amount).
As discussed above, it may be desirable to improve the efficiency of these projector systems, both in terms of energy efficiency and/or in terms of cost efficiency. One such area for improvement may be made in the area of the input prism assembly, e.g., as employed in conjunction with a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM)—such as a DMD and/or MEMS array as described herein.
As may be seen in
As depicted in
When the light source is high powered, such as high powered white light (e.g. Xenon lamp or the like) or high powered colored laser light, then heat may present undesired thermal effects that may manifest themselves in either undesirable imaging effects and/or mechanical element degradation. Undesirable effects may include change in PSF shape and/or size and positional drift of image from pre-mod to primary modulator over time and heat cycling.
For example, in the green channel as one of the separate color channel prism paths, optical element 602 is a green dump wedge, optical element 612 is a green wedge and optical element 600 is a green input wedge. In the blue channel, optical element 608 is a blue input wedge, optical element 610 is a blue dump wedge and optical element 616 is a blue wedge. In the red channel, optical element 606 is a red dump wedge, optical element 614 is a red wedge and optical element 604 is a red input wedge. It should be noted that each color channel has a number of optical elements deployed for the processing of the colored light input.
It should be appreciated that while one embodiment may take in separate colored light input (e.g., from lasers, LEDS, partially coherent light sources or the like), other embodiments may take in white light input (e.g., from Xenon lamp or the like). In such embodiments, it may be possible to separate the various color components from the white light prior to prism assembly (e.g., with another, initial, prism assembly or the like) and then process the separate color components with the prism assembly as made in accordance with the principles of the present application.
In operation,
Improved Thermal Profile
As mentioned above, today's projector systems are illuminated with higher power light sources. Such light sources may include Xenon white lamps, high powered colored lasers, and/or high powered partially coherent light sources. The performance of such prior art prism designs may not be desirable for many reasons in high powered image projector display system. For merely one example,
As may be seen, the thermal loads in the legend proceed from lowest to highest as: 1× (802), 2× (804), 3× (806), 4× (808) and 6× (810). As may be seen the prior art prism—under full illumination—purports to have many regions of high thermal load as noted.
By contrast,
As discussed herein, several alternative embodiments may include:
In many embodiments, the following ranges of f/# may suffice: f/2 to f/3 for non-laser illumination and f/4 to f/8 for laser illumination. For some preferred embodiments, the range can be f/2.4 to f/3 for non-laser illumination and f/4 to f/5 for laser illumination. Specific examples may include f/2.4 for typical xenon and f/4.5 for typical laser.
Coating optimization may be done to Anti-Reflective (AR) coatings and dichroic coatings that combine the light. The AR coatings on the input legs can be optimized per color (e.g., since each leg may see a single color) and angle (assuming higher f/# PSF relay is used). This optimization can result in better transmission (˜0.2% per surface, with 7 surfaces in each discrete path). In some cases, the angle is in reference to ‘angle of incidence’—where, in some cases for lower angles, it may be easier to get better coating transmissions. The dichroic coatings can be optimized for narrowband light (assuming non-lamp source) which can have improved reflectance and transmission compared to broader band coatings, and also optimized for narrower angles (will vary depending on narrow band wavelength choices). In some embodiments, coatings may be applied at various interfaces in the prism assembly. For example, in
Improvements in the dichroic coatings can also be useful to contrast ratio since light control may be desirable there and any unintended reflections may reduce contrast. In other embodiments, this design may also be applied to single-chip DLP projector with monochromatic or color sequential operation.
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention, read along with accompanying figures, that illustrate the principles of the invention has now been given. It is to be appreciated that the invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details have been set forth in this description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/540,946, filed Jun. 29, 2017, which in turn is the 371 national stage of PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/067197, filed Dec. 21, 2015. PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/067197 claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 62/240,287, filed on Oct. 12, 2015, U.S. Patent Application No. 62/200,417, filed on Aug. 3, 2015 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/099,054, filed on Dec. 31, 2014, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3659918 | Tan | May 1972 | A |
5619284 | Magocs | Apr 1997 | A |
6663243 | Fielding | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676260 | Cobb | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6869190 | Goto | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7334898 | Seto | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359026 | Bullwinkel | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7659880 | Miyazawa | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665850 | Penn | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7784949 | Yamauchi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7871165 | Silverstein | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7891816 | Silverstein | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7926951 | Bietry | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938541 | Mizushima | May 2011 | B2 |
7952806 | Callen | May 2011 | B2 |
7959297 | Silverstein | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993014 | Penn | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8033666 | Silverstein | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8066382 | Silverstein | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066389 | Silverstein | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8125702 | Ward | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8132919 | Harland | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8198573 | Kamijima | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8220931 | Silverstein | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235531 | Silverstein | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8287129 | Kurtz | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305502 | Silverstein | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8379322 | Smith | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8444275 | Kurtz | May 2013 | B2 |
8531492 | Wallener | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8649094 | Kurtz | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8684533 | Whitehead | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8786943 | Silverstein | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8830580 | Kurtz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8890905 | Kwong | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9135864 | Shields | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20050168697 | Bruzzone | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060007401 | Ho | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070024945 | Huang | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070085970 | Yoshida | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103788 | Magarill | May 2007 | A1 |
20070252957 | Penn | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080084545 | Chen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090009885 | Smith | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090153752 | Silverstein | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100007852 | Bietry | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100110390 | Andersen | May 2010 | A1 |
20110013144 | Silverstein | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110279749 | Erinjippurath | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120140186 | Kuwata | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120182484 | Imai | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130033685 | Katou | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130128232 | Laino | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162954 | Huang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140028697 | Kurtz | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028698 | Maier | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028699 | Kurtz | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140347634 | Bommerbach | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20160033757 | Kurtz | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-266915 | Sep 2000 | JP |
5484258 | May 2014 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Kwok H.S. et al., “Triochroic prism assembly for separating and recombining colors in a compact projection display”, Applied Optics, vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 168-172, Jan. 1, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190137859 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62240287 | Oct 2015 | US | |
62200417 | Aug 2015 | US | |
62099054 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15540946 | US | |
Child | 16222943 | US |