As shown in
As shown in
The first opening 56 has a bi-lobed shape that is shown in greater detail in FIGS. 4 and 5A-5C. This bi-lobed shape with the increased cross-sectional area improves cooling effectiveness. The bi-lobed shape is defined by a base portion 60, a first lobe 62 extending away from the base portion 60 in a first direction, and a second lobe 64 extending away from the base portion 60 in a second direction different than the first direction. The bi-lobed shape also includes an arcuate portion 66 that extends from each of the first 62 and second 64 lobes toward the base portion 60 to a center 68.
The base portion 60 has a first width and the first 62 and second 64 lobes extend away from each other to define a second width at distal tips that is larger than the first width. The lobes 62, 64 are formed such that the second width is orientated in a direction that is transverse to streamwise flow over the airfoil 32.
The first opening 56, which has the bi-lobed shape, is defined by a center of origin 70. The first lobe 62 is defined by a first radius R1 that extends from the center of origin 70 outwardly to a curved distal tip 72 and the second lobe 64 is defined by a second radius R2 that extends from the center of origin 70 to a curved distal tip 74. The center 68, which is a segment of the arcuate portion 66 that is closest to the center of origin 70, is defined by a third radius R3 that extends from the center of origin 70 to the center 68. The first R1 and second R2 radii are greater than the third radius R3.
The base portion 60 of the bi-lobed shape is defined by a first segment 60a, a second segment 60b on one side of the first segment 60a, and a third segment 60c on an opposite side of the first segment 60a. The first segment 60a is defined by a fourth radius R4 extending from the center of origin 70, the second segment 60b is defined by a fifth radius R5 extending from the center of origin 70, and the third segment 60c is defined by a sixth radius R6 extending from the center of origin 70. In the example shown, the first R1 and second R2 radii are greater than the fourth R4, fifth R5, and sixth R6 radii.
The cooling hole 50 transitions from the bi-lobed shape at the first opening 56 into a second shape that extends through the airfoil 32 to the second opening 58. The shape of the second opening 58 corresponds to this second shape. In the example shown, the second shape is circular. The circular shape portion of the cooling hole 50 is shown more clearly in
As shown more clearly in
The lengths of the various radii R1-7 can be varied to optimize cooling hole configurations for a specified gas turbine engine component. Each cooling hole 50 has a bi-lobed shape as described above, however, the dimensions of the various radii R1-7 can be adjusted as needed to provide more effective cooling for different types of components. As different gas turbine engine components have different flow characteristics depending upon an associated application, the dimensions of the cooling hole 50 can be optimized to size the cooling hole 50 for the best performance for the specified component.
An example of the optimization process is shown in the flowchart of
Once the input parameters are defined, the control radii R1-6 values can be varied or modified as needed to generate an initial hole configuration, as indicated at 110. Once a first set of control radii R1-6 have been entered, a geometry generation step is performed as indicated at 120, and a grid generation step is performed as indicated at 130. The geometry and grid generations are well known processes and will not be discussed in detail. The result of these steps is a component model with a first proposed hole configuration.
Next, as indicated at 140, an automated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) process is launched to analyze the component with this specified hole configuration. Again, CFD processes are well known and will not be discussed in further detail. The results of the CFD processes are then analyzed at 150 to determine characteristics such as pressure loss and cooling effectiveness, for example. This post processing is integrated with the parametric hole shape set forth defined by steps 100 and 110, which assesses the advantages of each hole parameter setting. Based on the analysis, the control radii R1-6 can be adjusted or modified as indicated at 160 by returning to step 110. During this step, the hole parameters are iterated with a numerical optimization algorithm that searches for the best combination of parameter settings that maximize film coverage/effectiveness. Each modification to the control radii R1-6 results in a different hole configuration, which is separately analyzed. Each configuration is then ranked as indicated at 170 and an optimum configuration is identified at 180.
It should be understood that the above discussed method for shape optimization, and the corresponding use of the specified control radii, are just examples. The bi-lobe shape could be defined by fewer or more radii than that discussed above. Further, the optimization process that is shown in the flowchart of
The cooling holes 50 can be easily formed within an associated component by using rapid electrical discharge machining (EDM), laser cutting, or other similar high precision cutting processes. By using these types of methods, shaped holes can be formed within a component in a cost effective manner.
Further, the bi-lobed shape of the cooling holes provides significant improvement in film effectiveness compared to prior art hole configurations. The hole shape provides high coverage by flaring the hole to a large width (at the lobed portion) in the direction perpendicular to the streamwise flow. Then the area ratio across the hole is optimized to force uniform flow through the hole without separation, and to lay a highly effective film on the surface to be cooled without blow-off. This is accomplished by contracting the downstream side of the hole forward (
One benefit with this configuration is that the bi-lobe shape forces flow to more uniformly fill the hole. Additionally, the amount of material need to be removed to create the hole shape is reduced, which results in decreased costs.
The present invention thus presents a unique shape for a cooling hole that lowers stress concentrations, and improves the ability of the rotor blade to withstand thermal stresses.
Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.