High damping cap layer for magnetic recording media

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9159350
  • Patent Number
    9,159,350
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 2, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 13, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
A recording medium having improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) capabilities includes a cap layer over the recording layer, where the cap layer has a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.03, such as by using a FeHo cap layer. One mechanism for increasing the SNR is by reducing the switching field distribution. Such a medium is particularly useful in the context of heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR).
Description
FIELD OF EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the invention may relate generally to hard disk drives and more particularly to magnetic recording media.


BACKGROUND

A hard-disk drive (HDD) is a non-volatile storage device that is housed in a protective enclosure and stores digitally encoded data on one or more circular disks having magnetic surfaces. When an HDD is in operation, each magnetic-recording disk is rapidly rotated by a spindle system. Data is read from and written to a magnetic-recording disk using a read/write head that is positioned over a specific location of a disk by an actuator. A read/write head uses a magnetic field to read data from and write data to the surface of a magnetic-recording disk. Write heads make use of the electricity flowing through a coil, which produces a magnetic field. Electrical pulses are sent to the write head, with different patterns of positive and negative currents. The current in the coil of the write head induces a magnetic field across the gap between the head and the magnetic disk, which in turn magnetizes a small area on the recording medium.


Increasing areal density (a measure of the quantity of information bits that can be stored on a given area of disk surface) is one of the ever-present goals of hard disk drive design evolution, and has led to the necessary development and implementation of various means for reducing the disk area needed to record a bit of information. It has been recognized that one significant challenge with minimizing bit size is based on the limitations imposed by the superparamagnetic effect whereby, in sufficiently small nanoparticles, the magnetization can randomly flip direction under the influence of thermal fluctuations.


Heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) is a technology that magnetically records data on high-stability media using, for example, laser thermal assistance to first heat the media material. HAMR takes advantage of high-stability, high coercivity magnetic compounds, such as iron platinum alloy, which can store single bits in a much smaller area without being limited by the same superparamagnetic effect that limits the current technology used in hard disk drive storage. However, at some capacity point the bit size is so small and the coercivity correspondingly so high that the magnetic field used for writing data cannot be made strong enough to permanently affect the data and data can no longer be written to the disk. HAMR solves this problem by temporarily and locally changing the coercivity of the magnetic storage medium by raising the temperature near the Curie temperature, at which the medium effectively loses coercivity and a realistically achievable magnetic write field can write data to the medium.


In order to improve the recording performance for media, including HAMR media, it is desirable to increase the SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) through structure design and materials selections.


Any approaches described in this section are approaches that could be pursued, but not necessarily approaches that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 is a plan view illustrating a hard disk drive, according to an embodiment;



FIG. 2 illustrates a magnetic recording medium stack having a cap layer, according to an embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a graph showing hysteresis loops of HAMR media with and without a cap layer, according to an embodiment; and



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of manufacturing a recording medium, according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Approaches to a recording medium having a cap layer composed of a high magnetic damping material over the magnetic recording layer are described. In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments described herein. It will be apparent, however, that the embodiments described herein may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the embodiments described herein.


Physical Description of Illustrative Operating Environments

Embodiments may be used in the context of a heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) medium in a hard-disk drive (HDD) data storage device. Thus, in accordance with an embodiment, a plan view illustrating an HDD 100 is shown in FIG. 1 to illustrate an exemplary operating environment.



FIG. 1 illustrates the functional arrangement of components of the HDD 100 including a slider 110b that includes a magnetic-reading/recording head 110a. Collectively, slider 110b and head 110a may be referred to as a head slider. The HDD 100 includes at least one head gimbal assembly (HGA) 110 including the head slider, a lead suspension 110c attached to the head slider typically via a flexure, and a load beam 110d attached to the lead suspension 110c. The HDD 100 also includes at least one magnetic-recording medium 120 rotatably mounted on a spindle 124 and a drive motor (not visible) attached to the spindle 124 for rotating the medium 120. The head 110a includes a write element and a read element for respectively writing and reading information stored on the medium 120 of the HDD 100. The medium 120 or a plurality of disk media may be affixed to the spindle 124 with a disk clamp 128.


The HDD 100 further includes an arm 132 attached to the HGA 110, a carriage 134, a voice-coil motor (VCM) that includes an armature 136 including a voice coil 140 attached to the carriage 134 and a stator 144 including a voice-coil magnet (not visible). The armature 136 of the VCM is attached to the carriage 134 and is configured to move the arm 132 and the HGA 110, to access portions of the medium 120, being mounted on a pivot-shaft 148 with an interposed pivot-bearing assembly 152. In the case of an HDD having multiple disks, the carriage 134 is called an “E-block,” or comb, because the carriage is arranged to carry a ganged array of arms that gives it the appearance of a comb.


An assembly comprising a head gimbal assembly (e.g., HGA 110) including a flexure to which the head slider is coupled, an actuator arm (e.g., arm 132) and/or load beam to which the flexure is coupled, and an actuator (e.g., the VCM) to which the actuator arm is coupled, may be collectively referred to as a head stack assembly (HSA). An HSA may, however, include more or fewer components than those described. For example, an HSA may refer to an assembly that further includes electrical interconnection components. Generally, an HSA is the assembly configured to move the head slider to access portions of the medium 120 for read and write operations.


With further reference to FIG. 1, electrical signals (e.g., current to the voice coil 140 of the VCM) comprising a write signal to and a read signal from the head 110a, are provided by a flexible interconnect cable 156 (“flex cable”). Interconnection between the flex cable 156 and the head 110a may be provided by an arm-electronics (AE) module 160, which may have an on-board pre-amplifier for the read signal, as well as other read-channel and write-channel electronic components. The AE 160 may be attached to the carriage 134 as shown. The flex cable 156 is coupled to an electrical-connector block 164, which provides electrical communication through electrical feedthroughs provided by an HDD housing 168. The HDD housing 168, also referred to as a base, in conjunction with an HDD cover provides a sealed, protective enclosure for the information storage components of the HDD 100.


Other electronic components, including a disk controller and servo electronics including a digital-signal processor (DSP), provide electrical signals to the drive motor, the voice coil 140 of the VCM and the head 110a of the HGA 110. The electrical signal provided to the drive motor enables the drive motor to spin providing a torque to the spindle 124 which is in turn transmitted to the medium 120 that is affixed to the spindle 124. As a result, the medium 120 spins in a direction 172. The spinning medium 120 creates a cushion of air that acts as an air-bearing on which the air-bearing surface (ABS) of the slider 110b rides so that the slider 110b flies above the surface of the medium 120 without making contact with a thin magnetic-recording layer in which information is recorded.


The electrical signal provided to the voice coil 140 of the VCM enables the head 110a of the HGA 110 to access a track 176 on which information is recorded. Thus, the armature 136 of the VCM swings through an arc 180, which enables the head 110a of the HGA 110 to access various tracks on the medium 120. Information is stored on the medium 120 in a plurality of radially nested tracks arranged in sectors on the medium 120, such as sector 184. Correspondingly, each track is composed of a plurality of sectored track portions (or “track sector”), for example, sectored track portion 188. Each sectored track portion 188 may be composed of recorded data and a header containing a servo-burst-signal pattern, for example, an ABCD-servo-burst-signal pattern, which is information that identifies the track 176, and error correction code information. In accessing the track 176, the read element of the head 110a of the HGA 110 reads the servo-burst-signal pattern which provides a position-error-signal (PES) to the servo electronics, which controls the electrical signal provided to the voice coil 140 of the VCM, enabling the head 110a to follow the track 176. Upon finding the track 176 and identifying a particular sectored track portion 188, the head 110a either reads data from the track 176 or writes data to the track 176 depending on instructions received by the disk controller from an external agent, for example, a microprocessor of a computer system.


INTRODUCTION

Heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology that utilizes L10 FePt based alloys has been widely investigated for use in hard disk drive media, with a belief that an areal density over 10 Tb/in2 may be achievable. As mentioned, increasing the SNR of media, including HAMR media, improves the recording performance. One approach to a media structure for HAMR applications consists of adhesion, intermediate, magnetic, overcoat and lubricant layers, all stacked on a substrate. To improve the recording performance of HAMR media, particularly media SNR and SNRdc, media structure design and material selection is an area of interest. For example, areas of research have involved media structure design and material selection relating to the magnetic layer, the intermediate layer (e.g., the seed layer, underlayer, heat sink), etc.


One approach to increasing SNR is to reduce the switching field distribution (SFD) of the magnetic layer. Data storage devices often utilize ferromagnetic materials which, when subjected to an externally applied magnetic field, may switch their magnetization (or “magnetic polarization”) between two stable orientations. A magnetic moment represents the torque that a ferromagnetic material experiences under the influence of an external magnetic field, and is commonly characterized as a vector, thus having a magnitude and a direction. Typically, when an applied magnetic field is switched from a first value to a second value, the magnetization of the ferromagnetic material may not immediately switch value commensurately, or may not completely switch valises in line with the direction of the applied magnetic field. That is, the magnetization of the ferromagnetic material may react in a manner which causes the magnetic moment to precess around the direction of the applied magnetic field until settling at a steady state value in the direction of the applied magnetic field. This magnetic precession is sometimes referred to as Larmor precession. Generally, the extent to which the magnetization of the ferromagnetic material switches under the influence of applied magnetic fields can be characterized as its SFD.


High Magnetic Damping Cap Layer for Recording Media


FIG. 2 illustrates a magnetic recording medium stack having a cap layer, according to an embodiment. The medium 200 includes a stacked structure with a bottom substrate 202, an adhesion layer 204 over or on the substrate 202, an intermediate layer 206 over or on the adhesion layer 204, a magnetic recording layer 208 over or on the intermediate layer 206, a cap layer 210 over or on the magnetic recording layer 208, an overcoat layer 212 over or on the cap layer 210, and a lubricant layer 214 on the overcoat layer 212.


According to an embodiment, the magnetic recording layer 208 may comprise a FePt based material. For example, the magnetic recording layer 208 may include FePt or any suitable FePt alloys (e.g., L10 FePt).


There may be multiple approaches to describing the aforementioned magnetic precession motion that may occur in materials such as ferromagnetic metals. One known approach for describing such magnetic precession, i.e., for predicting the rotation of the magnetization in response to torques, is referred to as the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (“LLG”) equation. The LLG equation includes a damping term, parameter, or coefficient (also referred to herein as a “damping constant”), which is a characteristic of the material. Thus, the amount of tune needed for the magnetization within a material to reach a steady state after the magnetic field applied to the material has been switched may be described by and referred to as the Gilbert magnetic damping constant for the material. If the magnetic damping of a material is high, then the magnetization of the material may reach a steady state value more quickly after the applied magnetic field has switched, as compared to materials with a lower magnetic damping. Consequently, a sharper transition of the magnetization of the ferromagnetic material to the steady state value is possible with relatively high magnetic damping materials, in conjunction with an appropriately featured write head.


Furthermore, a technique that may be used for measuring a material's magnetic damping characteristics is referred to as ferromagnetic resonance, which is a spectroscopic technique used for probing the magnetization of ferromagnetic materials and for studying spin dynamics. Thus, ferromagnetic resonance is a useful tool in studying the precessional motion of a ferromagnetic material under the influence of an external magnetic field and, likewise, the material's inherent magnetic damping attributes. According to an embodiment, a ferromagnetic resonance technique is employed to measure the damping constant of cap layer 210.


One approach to characterizing the magnetic damping corresponding to a recording medium includes assessing and characterizing an average damping of the magnetic recording layer 208 and the cap layer 210, based at least on the relative damping constants of each layer and their respective thicknesses. Therefore, generally, the greater the magnetic damping constant of the cap layer 210 the greater the damping attributable to the medium. Because the thickness and composition of the magnetic recording layer 208 and cap layer 210 may vary from implementation to implementation, likewise, the damping constant of the cap layer 210 may vary from implementation to implementation.


According to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 comprises a material having a higher magnetic damping than Fe. The comparison with Fe corresponds generally with the use of Fe in the magnetic recording layer 208 and/or the use of Fe in the cap layer 210 along with one or more other element having a higher magnetic damping than Fe. The magnetic damping constant of pure Fe, Co and Ni are reported to be in the approximately 0.003-0.005 range.


However, according to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 comprises a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than about 0.03, which is considered a value at which a desirable effect on the medium damping is expected. According to another embodiment, the cap layer 210 comprises a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than about 0.2, which is considered a value at which an approximate 5% damping of the medium may be expected (i.e., a 0.05 media damping coefficient). Therefore, according to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 comprises a material having a magnetic damping constant in a preferable range of about 0.03-0.2. However, an extended range from about 0.003 to exceed Fe, Co, Ni, to a value that would achieve 20% media damping, is contemplated.


According to an embodiment, cap layer 210 comprises a lanthanide (or lanthanoid) element, where the lanthanide series of chemical elements includes the fifteen metallic elements with atomic numbers 57-71 (lanthanum to lutetium), i.e., part of the rare earth elements. The lanthanides include neodymium (Nd), holmium (Ho), and erbium (Er), to name just a few. Reference to use of a lanthanide element constituent to cap layer 210 may include the use of a lanthanide alloy, which could include an alloy composed of multiple lanthanides or an alloy composed of a lanthanide and one or more non-lanthanide metal. Use of a lanthanide in cap layer 210 is based on the corresponding and relatively high magnetic damping characteristics.


According to an embodiment, cap layer 210 comprises FeHo. The introduction of a high damping FeHo based alloy cap layer 210 is capable of increasing SNR, SNRfinal and SNRdc compared to current FePt based HAMR media without a cap layer. In addition, jitter and magnetic switching field are also reduced with the presence of the FeHo cap layer. For non-limiting examples, research has shown results increasing the SNR, SNRfinal and SNRdc by 0.7 dB, 1.8 dB and 1.0 dB, respectively; a reduction in jitter associated with the magnetic recording layer by 0.8 nm; and a reduction in switching field distribution (SFD) of the magnetic recording layer by 9.5%.


Because of the general relationship that the greater the magnetic damping constant of the cap layer 210 the greater the damping attributable to the medium, an ever higher and higher damping cap layer 210 is desirable, but could be constrained by manufacturing capabilities. Thus, according to an embodiment the cap layer 210 includes Ho up to about 20 atomic percent or less. According to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 has a thickness of less than about 5 nm. The cap layer 210 may have a thickness in a preferred but non-limiting range of about 0.5 nm to 2.5 nm. Further, and according to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 comprises a semi-crystalline structure. However, crystalline and/or amorphous structures are not excluded from use. Further still, and according to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 is fabricated to be directly on and in contact with the magnetic recording layer 208. Further still, and according to an embodiment, the cap layer 210 is fabricated to be exchange coupled with the magnetic recording layer 208.


As discussed, the addition of the cap layer 210 can enable an increase in the SNR of the magnetic recording layer 208 by reducing the SFD of the medium. The medium 200 described in reference to FIG. 2 is well-suited for use in hard disk drive heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) systems, wherein individual magnetic recording bit size and overall areal density are significant design goals. However, other types of energy-assisted media and “traditional” media (e.g., perpendicular magnetic recording, or PMR) based systems may also benefit from the use of a high damping cap layer in the respective media types.


To further improve the recording performance of the medium 200, especially media SNR, various suitable media designs and material selections may be used. According to an embodiment, the substrate 202 may include a material selected from the group consisting of an Al alloy, NiP plated Al, glass, glass ceramic, and combinations thereof. Further, and according to an embodiment, the adhesion layer 204 may include a material selected from the group consisting of CrTi, CrTa, NiTa, CoCrTaZr, CoFeZrBCr, CoTaZr, CoFeTaZr, CoCrWTaZr, CoCrMoTaZr, CoZrWMo and combinations thereof. Further still, and according to an embodiment, the intermediate layer 206 may include Cr, Mo, Ru, W, CuZr, MoCu, AgPd, CrRu, CrV, CrW, CrMo, CrNd, NiAl, NiTa, CrTiX, CrTaX, NiTaX, CoCrTaZrX, CoFeZrBCrX, CoTaZrX, CoFeTaZrX, CoCrWTaZrX, CoCrMoTaZrX, CoZrWMoX, and combinations thereof, wherein X is selected from the group consisting of SiO2 and ZrO2. According to an embodiment, the overcoat layer 212 may include diamond-like-carbon (DLC). According to an embodiment, the lubricant layer 214 may include a polymer-based material.



FIG. 3 is a graph showing hysteresis loops of HAMR media (e.g., HAMR medium 200) with and without a cap layer, according to an embodiment. The loops 302 correspond to a HAMR medium with a FeHo cap layer and the loops 304 correspond to a reference HAMR medium without a cap layer. As shown in FIG. 3, the HAMR medium with the cap layer (302) has an SFD of about 15.6 percent, and the reference HAMR medium (304) has an SFD of about 25.1 percent, which equates to a significant reduction of about 9.5 percent in SFD. From the hysteresis loops of FIG. 3, the SFD of the HAMR media can be calculated, for example, based on a relationship between (a) the difference of the field H1 (at moment=0.5) and the field H2 (at moment=0.5), and (b) the field Hc (at moment=0).


Embodiments described herein may be directed to a HAMR media design utilizing a cap layer for improved SNR. In various embodiments, the introduction of a suitable cap layer results in a desirable decrease in the magnetic switching field and a corresponding increase in the SNR for the HAMR media. However, embodiments are not limited to HAMR technology only, as embodiments may be implemented in the context of other types of magnetic recording media.


Method of Manufacturing Recording Media

Embodiments may be implemented in a HAMR hard disk drive including such HAMR media. FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of manufacturing a recording medium, according to an embodiment. The media stack described herein can be fabricated, for example, by a sputtering process using a sputtering system.


At block 402, a magnetic recording layer is formed on a substrate. For example, magnetic recording layer 208 (FIG. 2) is formed on substrate 202 (FIG. 2). As noted in reference to FIG. 2, an adhesion layer 204 and an intermediate layer 206 may also be fabricated on substrate 202 before forming the magnetic recording layer 208.


At block 404, a cap layer is formed on and exchange coupled with the magnetic recording layer, where the cap layer comprises a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.03. For example, cap layer 210 (FIG. 2) is formed (e.g., sputtered) directly on top of the magnetic recording layer 208. As with aforementioned embodiments, the cap layer formed at block 404 may have a magnetic damping higher than Fe; such a cap layer may comprise a lanthanide; and such a cap layer may comprise FeHo, for example, having a thickness less than about 5 nm, having Ho at about 20 atomic percent or less, and having a semi-crystalline structure.


The deposition of layers can be performed using a variety of deposition sub-processes, for non-limiting examples, physical vapor deposition (PVD), sputter deposition and ion beam deposition, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) including plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) and atomic layer chemical vapor deposition (ALCVD). Furthermore, other suitable deposition techniques known in the art may also be used.


Extensions and Alternatives

In the foregoing description, embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to numerous specific details that may vary from implementation to implementation. Therefore, various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the embodiments. Thus, the sole and exclusive indicator of what is the invention, and is intended by the applicants to be the invention, is the set of claims that issue from this application, in the specific form in which such claims issue, including any subsequent correction. Any definitions expressly set forth herein for terms contained in such claims shall govern the meaning of such terms as used in the claims. Hence, no limitation, element, property, feature, advantage or attribute that is not expressly recited in a claim should limit the scope of such claim in any way. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.


In addition, in this description certain process steps may be set forth in a particular order, and alphabetic and alphanumeric labels may be used to identify certain steps. Unless specifically stated in the description, embodiments are not necessarily limited to any particular order of carrying out such steps. In particular, the labels are used merely for convenient identification of steps, and are not intended to specify or require a particular order of carrying out such steps.

Claims
  • 1. A recording medium comprising: a substrate;an adhesion layer over said substrate;an intermediate layer over said adhesion layer;a magnetic recording layer over said substrate, said adhesion layer and said intermediate layer;a cap layer on said magnetic recording layer, said cap layer comprising a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.03;an overcoat layer over said cap layer; anda lubricant layer over said overcoat layer.
  • 2. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer comprises a material having a magnetic damping constant of about 0.2.
  • 3. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer comprises a material having higher magnetic damping than Fe.
  • 4. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer comprises a lanthanide element.
  • 5. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer comprises FeHo.
  • 6. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer is a semi-crystalline structure.
  • 7. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer comprises Ho at approximately 20 atomic percent or less.
  • 8. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer has a thickness less than approximately 5 nm.
  • 9. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer is exchange coupled with said magnetic recording layer comprising FePt.
  • 10. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said cap layer and said magnetic recording layer are configured to reduce the switching field distribution of said magnetic recording layer.
  • 11. The recording medium of claim 1, wherein said magnetic damping constant is determined using a ferromagnetic resonance technique.
  • 12. A data storage device comprising: a heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) disk medium rotatably mounted on a spindle, said HAMR disk medium comprising: a substrate;an adhesion layer over said substrate;an intermediate layer over said adhesion layer;a magnetic recording layer over said substrate, said adhesion layer and said intermediate layer;a cap layer on said magnetic recording layer, said cap layer comprising a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.003;an overcoat layer over said cap layer; anda lubricant layer over said overcoat layer;a heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) head slider comprising a magnetic write head configured to write to said HAMR disk medium;a laser module coupled with said slider; anda voice coil motor configured to move said HAMR head slider to access portions of said HAMR disk medium.
  • 13. The data storage device claim 12, wherein said cap layer of said HAMR disk medium comprises a material having a magnetic damping constant of about 0.2.
  • 14. The data storage device claim 12, wherein said cap layer of said HAMR disk medium comprises a lanthanide.
  • 15. The data storage device of claim 12, wherein said cap layer of said HAMR disk medium comprises FeHo.
  • 16. The data storage device of claim 12, wherein said magnetic damping constant is determined using a ferromagnetic resonance technique.
  • 17. A method of manufacturing a recording medium, the method comprising: forming a magnetic recording layer on a substrate; andforming a cap layer on and exchange coupled with said magnetic recording layer, said cap layer comprising a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.03;wherein said cap layer and said magnetic recording layer are formed to reduce the switching field distribution of said magnetic recording layer.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein forming said cap layer comprises forming a cap layer comprising FeHo.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein forming said magnetic recording layer comprises forming a magnetic recording layer of FePt, and wherein forming said cap layer comprises forming a cap layer comprising a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.003.
  • 20. A recording medium comprising: a substrate;a magnetic recording layer over said substrate; anda cap layer on said magnetic recording layer, said cap layer comprising a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.03;wherein said cap layer and said magnetic recording layer are configured to reduce the switching field distribution of said magnetic recording layer.
  • 21. A data storage device comprising: a heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) disk medium rotatably mounted on a spindle, said HAMR disk medium comprising: a substrate;a magnetic recording layer on said substrate; anda cap layer on said magnetic recording layer, said cap layer comprising a material having a magnetic damping constant greater than 0.003;wherein said cap layer and said magnetic recording layer are configured to reduce the switching field distribution of said magnetic recording layer;a heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) head slider comprising a magnetic write head configured to write to said HAMR disk medium;a laser module coupled with said slider; anda voice coil motor configured to move said HAMR head slider to access portions of said HAMR disk medium.
US Referenced Citations (377)
Number Name Date Kind
4525412 Nakane et al. Jun 1985 A
4536444 Sumiya et al. Aug 1985 A
5134288 Van Dijck Jul 1992 A
5777973 Yoo et al. Jul 1998 A
6013161 Chen et al. Jan 2000 A
6063248 Bourez et al. May 2000 A
6068891 O'Dell et al. May 2000 A
6086730 Liu et al. Jul 2000 A
6099981 Nishimori Aug 2000 A
6103404 Ross et al. Aug 2000 A
6117499 Wong et al. Sep 2000 A
6136403 Prabhakara et al. Oct 2000 A
6143375 Ross et al. Nov 2000 A
6145849 Bae et al. Nov 2000 A
6146737 Malhotra et al. Nov 2000 A
6149696 Jia Nov 2000 A
6150015 Bertero et al. Nov 2000 A
6156404 Ross et al. Dec 2000 A
6159076 Sun et al. Dec 2000 A
6164118 Suzuki et al. Dec 2000 A
6200441 Gornicki et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204995 Hokkyo et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206765 Sanders et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210819 Lal et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216709 Fung et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221119 Homola Apr 2001 B1
6248395 Homola et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261681 Suekane et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270885 Hokkyo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274063 Li et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283838 Blake et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287429 Moroishi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290573 Suzuki Sep 2001 B1
6299947 Suzuki et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303217 Malhotra et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309765 Suekane et al. Oct 2001 B1
6358636 Yang et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362452 Suzuki et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363599 Bajorek Apr 2002 B1
6365012 Sato et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381090 Suzuki et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381092 Suzuki Apr 2002 B1
6387483 Hokkyo et al. May 2002 B1
6391213 Homola May 2002 B1
6395349 Salamon May 2002 B1
6403919 Salamon Jun 2002 B1
6408677 Suzuki Jun 2002 B1
6426157 Hokkyo et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429984 Alex Aug 2002 B1
6482330 Bajorek Nov 2002 B1
6482505 Bertero et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500567 Bertero et al. Dec 2002 B1
6528124 Nguyen Mar 2003 B1
6548821 Treves et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552871 Suzuki et al. Apr 2003 B2
6565719 Lairson et al. May 2003 B1
6566674 Treves et al. May 2003 B1
6571806 Rosano et al. Jun 2003 B2
6628466 Alex Sep 2003 B2
6664503 Hsieh et al. Dec 2003 B1
6670055 Tomiyasu et al. Dec 2003 B2
6682807 Lairson et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683754 Suzuki et al. Jan 2004 B2
6730420 Bertero et al. May 2004 B1
6743528 Suekane et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759138 Tomiyasu et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773826 Nakagawa et al. Aug 2004 B2
6778353 Harper Aug 2004 B1
6795274 Hsieh et al. Sep 2004 B1
6855232 Jairson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857937 Bajorek Feb 2005 B2
6893748 Bertero et al. May 2005 B2
6899959 Bertero et al. May 2005 B2
6916558 Umezawa et al. Jul 2005 B2
6939120 Harper Sep 2005 B1
6946191 Morikawa et al. Sep 2005 B2
6967798 Homola et al. Nov 2005 B2
6972135 Homola Dec 2005 B2
7004827 Suzuki et al. Feb 2006 B1
7006323 Suzuki Feb 2006 B1
7016154 Nishihira Mar 2006 B2
7019924 McNeil et al. Mar 2006 B2
7045215 Shimokawa May 2006 B2
7052757 Chaiken et al. May 2006 B2
7070870 Bertero et al. Jul 2006 B2
7090934 Hokkyo et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099112 Harper Aug 2006 B1
7105241 Shimokawa et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119990 Bajorek et al. Oct 2006 B2
7147790 Wachenschwanz et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161753 Wachenschwanz et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166319 Ishiyama Jan 2007 B2
7166374 Suekane et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169487 Kawai et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174775 Ishiyama Feb 2007 B2
7179549 Malhotra et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184139 Treves et al. Feb 2007 B2
7196860 Alex Mar 2007 B2
7199977 Suzuki et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208236 Morikawa et al. Apr 2007 B2
7220500 Tomiyasu et al. May 2007 B1
7229266 Harper Jun 2007 B2
7239970 Treves et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252897 Shimokawa et al. Aug 2007 B2
7277254 Shimokawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7281920 Homola et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292329 Treves et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301726 Suzuki Nov 2007 B1
7302148 Treves et al. Nov 2007 B2
7305119 Treves et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313015 Bessho Dec 2007 B2
7314404 Singh et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320584 Harper et al. Jan 2008 B1
7329114 Harper et al. Feb 2008 B2
7375362 Treves et al. May 2008 B2
7420886 Tomiyasu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425719 Treves et al. Sep 2008 B2
7471484 Wachenschwanz et al. Dec 2008 B2
7498062 Calcaterra et al. Mar 2009 B2
7531485 Hara et al. May 2009 B2
7537846 Ishiyama et al. May 2009 B2
7549209 Wachenschwanz et al. Jun 2009 B2
7569490 Staud Aug 2009 B2
7597792 Homola et al. Oct 2009 B2
7597973 Ishiyama Oct 2009 B2
7608193 Wachenschwanz et al. Oct 2009 B2
7632087 Homola Dec 2009 B2
7656615 Wachenschwanz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7682546 Harper Mar 2010 B2
7684152 Suzuki et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686606 Harper et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686991 Harper Mar 2010 B2
7695833 Ishiyama Apr 2010 B2
7722968 Ishiyama May 2010 B2
7733605 Suzuki et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736768 Ishiyama Jun 2010 B2
7755861 Li et al. Jul 2010 B1
7758732 Calcaterra et al. Jul 2010 B1
7833639 Sonobe et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833641 Tomiyasu et al. Nov 2010 B2
7910159 Jung Mar 2011 B2
7911736 Bajorek Mar 2011 B2
7924519 Lambert Apr 2011 B2
7944165 O'Dell May 2011 B1
7944643 Jiang et al. May 2011 B1
7955723 Umezawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7964297 Deng et al. Jun 2011 B2
7983003 Sonobe et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993497 Moroishi et al. Aug 2011 B2
7993765 Kim et al. Aug 2011 B2
7998607 Ikeda Aug 2011 B2
7998912 Chen et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002901 Chen et al. Aug 2011 B1
8003237 Sonobe et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012920 Shimokawa Sep 2011 B2
8038863 Homola Oct 2011 B2
8057926 Ayama et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062778 Suzuki et al. Nov 2011 B2
8064156 Suzuki et al. Nov 2011 B1
8067104 Tanaka et al. Nov 2011 B2
8076013 Sonobe et al. Dec 2011 B2
8089723 Schabes Jan 2012 B2
8092931 Ishiyama et al. Jan 2012 B2
8100685 Harper et al. Jan 2012 B1
8101054 Chen et al. Jan 2012 B2
8125723 Nichols et al. Feb 2012 B1
8125724 Nichols et al. Feb 2012 B1
8137517 Bourez Mar 2012 B1
8142916 Umezawa et al. Mar 2012 B2
8154915 Yoshikawa et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163093 Chen et al. Apr 2012 B1
8171949 Lund et al. May 2012 B1
8173282 Sun et al. May 2012 B1
8178480 Hamakubo et al. May 2012 B2
8202636 Choe et al. Jun 2012 B2
8206789 Suzuki Jun 2012 B2
8218260 Iamratanakul et al. Jul 2012 B2
8247095 Champion et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257783 Suzuki et al. Sep 2012 B2
8298609 Liew et al. Oct 2012 B1
8298689 Sonobe et al. Oct 2012 B2
8309239 Umezawa et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316668 Chan et al. Nov 2012 B1
8331056 O'Dell Dec 2012 B2
8345380 Sato et al. Jan 2013 B2
8354618 Chen et al. Jan 2013 B1
8367228 Sonobe et al. Feb 2013 B2
8383209 Ayama Feb 2013 B2
8394243 Jung et al. Mar 2013 B1
8397751 Chan et al. Mar 2013 B1
8399809 Bourez Mar 2013 B1
8402638 Treves et al. Mar 2013 B1
8404056 Chen et al. Mar 2013 B1
8404369 Ruffini et al. Mar 2013 B2
8404370 Sato et al. Mar 2013 B2
8406918 Tan et al. Mar 2013 B2
8414966 Yasumori et al. Apr 2013 B2
8425975 Ishiyama Apr 2013 B2
8431257 Kim et al. Apr 2013 B2
8431258 Onoue et al. Apr 2013 B2
8453315 Kajiwara et al. Jun 2013 B2
8488276 Jung et al. Jul 2013 B1
8491800 Dorsey Jul 2013 B1
8492009 Homola et al. Jul 2013 B1
8492011 Itoh et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496466 Treves et al. Jul 2013 B1
8517364 Crumley et al. Aug 2013 B1
8517657 Chen et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524052 Tan et al. Sep 2013 B1
8530065 Chernyshov et al. Sep 2013 B1
8546000 Umezawa Oct 2013 B2
8551253 Na'im et al. Oct 2013 B2
8551627 Shimada et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556566 Suzuki et al. Oct 2013 B1
8559131 Masuda et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562748 Chen et al. Oct 2013 B1
8565050 Bertero et al. Oct 2013 B1
8570844 Yuan et al. Oct 2013 B1
8576519 Carey et al. Nov 2013 B1
8580410 Onoue Nov 2013 B2
8584687 Chen et al. Nov 2013 B1
8591709 Lim et al. Nov 2013 B1
8592061 Onoue et al. Nov 2013 B2
8596287 Chen et al. Dec 2013 B1
8597723 Jung et al. Dec 2013 B1
8603649 Onoue Dec 2013 B2
8603650 Sonobe et al. Dec 2013 B2
8605388 Yasumori et al. Dec 2013 B2
8605555 Chernyshov et al. Dec 2013 B1
8608147 Yap et al. Dec 2013 B1
8609263 Chernyshov et al. Dec 2013 B1
8619381 Moser et al. Dec 2013 B2
8623528 Umezawa et al. Jan 2014 B2
8623529 Suzuki Jan 2014 B2
8634155 Yasumori et al. Jan 2014 B2
8658003 Bourez Feb 2014 B1
8658292 Mallary et al. Feb 2014 B1
8665541 Saito Mar 2014 B2
8668953 Buechel-Rimmel Mar 2014 B1
8674327 Poon et al. Mar 2014 B1
8685214 Moh et al. Apr 2014 B1
8696404 Sun et al. Apr 2014 B2
8711499 Desai et al. Apr 2014 B1
8743666 Bertero et al. Jun 2014 B1
8758912 Srinivasan et al. Jun 2014 B2
8787124 Chernyshov et al. Jul 2014 B1
8787130 Yuan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8791391 Bourez Jul 2014 B2
8795765 Koike et al. Aug 2014 B2
8795790 Sonobe et al. Aug 2014 B2
8795857 Ayama et al. Aug 2014 B2
8800322 Chan et al. Aug 2014 B1
8811129 Yuan et al. Aug 2014 B1
8817410 Moser et al. Aug 2014 B1
20010028625 Asada et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020060883 Suzuki May 2002 A1
20020071377 Ogata Jun 2002 A1
20030022024 Wachenschwanz Jan 2003 A1
20040022387 Weikle Feb 2004 A1
20040132301 Harper et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040202793 Harper et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040202865 Homola et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209123 Bajorek et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209470 Bajorek Oct 2004 A1
20050036223 Wachenschwanz et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050142990 Homola Jun 2005 A1
20050150862 Harper et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151282 Harper et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151283 Bajorek et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050151300 Harper et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050155554 Saito Jul 2005 A1
20050167867 Bajorek et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050263401 Olsen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060147758 Jung et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060181697 Treves et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060207890 Staud Sep 2006 A1
20060286413 Liu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070070549 Suzuki et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070087227 Ma et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070171575 Lim et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070245909 Homola Oct 2007 A1
20080075845 Sonobe et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080093760 Harper et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080138662 Berger et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090067092 Suwa et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068500 Kong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090117408 Umezawa et al. May 2009 A1
20090136784 Suzuki et al. May 2009 A1
20090155627 Berger et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169922 Ishiyama Jul 2009 A1
20090191331 Umezawa et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090197119 Kong et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090202866 Kim et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090273861 Tanaka et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090311557 Onoue et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100020324 Uchida Jan 2010 A1
20100065935 Horng et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100073813 Dai et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100092802 Ma et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098873 Verhaverbeke et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100119877 Wu et al. May 2010 A1
20100119878 Umezawa et al. May 2010 A1
20100124672 Thangaraj et al. May 2010 A1
20100143752 Ishibashi et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100159283 Ibusuki et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100190035 Sonobe et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100196619 Ishiyama Aug 2010 A1
20100196740 Ayama et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209601 Shimokawa et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209737 Bian et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100215992 Horikawa et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232065 Suzuki et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247965 Onoue Sep 2010 A1
20100261039 Itoh et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100261040 Foad et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279151 Sakamoto et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300884 Homola et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304186 Shimokawa Dec 2010 A1
20110097603 Onoue Apr 2011 A1
20110097604 Onoue Apr 2011 A1
20110111159 Sinclair et al. May 2011 A1
20110143169 Albrecht et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110151278 Gurney et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110171495 Tachibana et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110194207 Sato et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110206947 Tachibana et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110212346 Onoue et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110223446 Onoue et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244119 Umezawa et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110299194 Aniya et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311841 Saito et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120069466 Okamoto et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120070692 Sato et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077060 Ozawa Mar 2012 A1
20120127599 Shimokawa et al. May 2012 A1
20120127601 Suzuki et al. May 2012 A1
20120129009 Sato et al. May 2012 A1
20120140359 Tachibana Jun 2012 A1
20120141833 Umezawa et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120141835 Sakamoto Jun 2012 A1
20120148875 Hamakubo et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120156523 Seki et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164488 Shin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170152 Sonobe et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120171369 Koike et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120175243 Fukuura et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120189872 Umezawa et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120196049 Azuma et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207919 Sakamoto et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120225217 Itoh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120225325 Nemoto et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251842 Yuan et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120251846 Desai et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120276417 Shimokawa et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120308722 Suzuki et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130016591 Tomikawa et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130029182 Zhang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130040167 Alagarsamy et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130063841 Braganca et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130071694 Srinivasan et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130128378 Yuan et al. May 2013 A1
20130155543 Honda et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165029 Sun et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130175252 Bourez Jul 2013 A1
20130194901 Kanbe et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130216865 Yasumori et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130230647 Onoue et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130314815 Yuan et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130320254 Bhatia et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140011054 Suzuki Jan 2014 A1
20140044992 Onoue Feb 2014 A1
20140050843 Yi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140085753 Nagasaka et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140151360 Gregory et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140175581 Guo Jun 2014 A1
20140234666 Knigge et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150091110 Kuo et al. Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
101882445 Nov 2010 CN
08263886 Oct 1996 JP
2003085702 Mar 2003 JP
2008030199 Mar 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (28)
Entry
William Bailey, et al., “Control of Magnetization Dynamics in Ni81Fe19 Thin Films Through the Use of Rare-Earth Dopants,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 4, Jul. 2001, pp. 1749-1754.
R. Brenier, et al., “Chemical effects in ion beam mixing of Fe—Al multilayers,” Journal de Physique IV, vol. 4, Feb. 1994, pp. C3-263-C3-271.
Alessandro Cuccoli, et al., “Anisotropy and Ising-type transition of the S=5/2 two-dimensional antiferromagnet Mn-formate di-Urea,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 93, No. 10, May 15, 2003, pp. 7637-7639.
Alan M. Ferrenberg, et al., “Monte Carlo study of phase transitions in ferromagnetic bilayers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 70, No. 10, Nov. 15, 1991, pp. 6215-6217.
J. Ghatak, et al., “Ion beam induced enhanced diffusion from gold thin films in silicon,” Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar, India, Materials Science Division, Indira Gandhi Center for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, India, pp. 1-15.
J.F. Hu, et al., “Exchange coupling assisted FePtC perpendicular recording media,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, 2008, pp. 072504-1-072504-3.
Y. Inaba, et al., “Preliminary Study on (CoPtCr/NiFe)-SiO2 Hard/Soft-Stacked Perpendicular Recording Media,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 3136-3138.
H.S. Jung, et al., “Comparison of media properties between hard/soft stacked composite and capping layer perpendicular recording media,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 320, 2008, pp. 3151-3156.
H.S. Jung, et al., “Effect of magnetic softness in a soft layer on media properties of hard/soft stacked composite perpendicular media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, 2009, pp. 07B740-1-07B740-3.
Pavol Krivosik, et al., “Ferromagnetic resonance and damping in granular Co—Cr films with perpendicular anistropy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, 2009, pp. 052509-1-052509-3.
Michael Nastasi, “Ion Beam Mixing,” Materials Sci. Tech. Div., Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, presented in Sicily, Italy, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-42.
Nedo and Hitachi Presentation, create prior to Jul. 1, 2013, pp. 1-3.
Nedo, Hitachi and Hitachi GST, “Microwave-Assisted Magnetic Recording for Net Gen HDD,” StorageNewsletter.com, Nov. 2010, pp. 1-3.
K. Norlund, et al., “Mechanisms of ion beam mixing in metals and semiconductors,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 83, No. 3, 1998, pp. 1238-1246.
J. Sasaki, et al., “Magnetic properties of mesoscopic ultrathin magnetic films with uniaxial anistropy,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 87, No. 6, Mar. 2000, pp. 3018-3022.
J.-U. Thiele, et al., “Temperature dependent magnetic properties of highly chemically ordered Fe55-xNixPt45L10 films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, No. 10, May 2002, pp. 6595-6600.
R. H. Victora, et al., “Temporal Fluctuations of Magnetic Anistropy and their Impact on HAMR Media Noise,” The Center for Micromagnetics and Information Technologies, Aug. 18, 2010, pp. 1-19.
Zhou, et al., “Anistropy graded FePt—TiO2 nanocomposite thin films with small grain size,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, 2009, pp. 152505-1-152505-3.
Zhu, et al., “Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 125-131.
J.-U. Thiele, et al., “Perpendicular magnetic anistropy and magnetic domain structure in sputtered epitaxial FePt (001) L10 films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 84, No. 10, Nov. 1998, pp. 5686-5692.
Dieter Weller, et al., “High Ku Materials Approach to 100 Gbits/in2,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 36, No. 1, Jan. 2000, pp. 10-15.
Dieter Weller, et al., “Thermal Effect Limits in Ultrahigh-Density Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35, No. 6, Nov. 1999, pp. 4423-4439.
Hiroaki Nemoto, et al., “Highly Hk-graded perpendicular media with [CoB/Pt]n+O multilayer film,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 109, 2011, pp. 07B719-1-07B719-3.
Hiroaki Nemoto, et al., “Ultrahigh-Hc granular media with [CoB/Pt]n multilayer film sputtered under Ar+O2 atmosphere,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, 2009, pp. 07B705-1-07B705-3.
Gerardo A. Bertero, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/773,466, filed Feb. 21, 2013, 20 pages.
Michael L. Mallary, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/740,115, filed Jan. 11, 2013, 21 pages.
Bincheng Wang, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,370, filed Jul. 1, 2013, 19 pages.
Debashish Tripathy, et al. U.S. Appl. No. 14/315,101, filed Jun. 25, 2014, 33 pages.