Various types of displays offering autostereoscopic (i.e., viewable without glasses or near-eye optics, or “auto-viewed”) three-dimensional (3D) displays have been suggested. One class of such an auto-viewed 3D display is referred to as a horizontal parallax-only (HPO) display, lenticular display, raster barrier display, or parallax barrier display, incorporating various means of separating the distinct parallax views in one dimension (e.g., horizontally). This class of displays incorporates apertures or lenses to multiplex two-dimensional (2D) pixel arrays into specific and limited visibility angles, thus enabling presentation of distinct parallax or animation sequence scene views to each eye. For example, the number of discrete parallax view channels is determined by the field angle of the lenticular lens used within the display, the separation between the pixels and the lens or aperture, the width of the lens or aperture, and the size of the pixels. Some examples of existing auto-viewed 3D displays are described in US Patent Publication No. 2016/0234487 A1 to Kroon et al. and 2017/0208319 A1 to Kim et al.
When the distribution of views is limited to the horizontal direction, the number of distinct samples in the pixel layer in the horizontal direction is greater than that in the vertical direction by at least a factor of two, and as much as a factor of a hundred or more. Standard display technologies, such as those based on organic light emitting diode (OLED) or transmissive liquid crystal (LC) technology, are limited in the minimum size of pixels, and consequently the size of lenses or inter-aperture spacings, because the pixel size is constrained by the required display brightness and practical pixel-driver circuit size. Some tradeoffs have been exploited by using tilted lenticular lenses (see Kroon et al., cited above) and pixels from several vertical rows (see Kim et al., cited above) to increase the number of horizontal angles and the span of distribution while potentially reducing crosstalk, albeit at the expense of display vertical resolution.
A solution to overcome such problems with existing display systems would be desirable.
The following presents a simplified summary of one or more aspects in order to provide a basic understanding of such aspects. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated aspects and is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of all aspects nor delineate the scope of any or all aspects. Its purpose is to present some concepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
In an embodiment, a display device based on micro light emitting diodes (microLEDs) includes a plurality of chiplets. Each chiplet includes one or more raxels, each raxel including a plurality of microLEDs supported on a substrate. The chiplet also includes a micro integrated circuit (microIC) electronically connected with the one or more raxels. MicroIC includes a plurality of interconnects supported on a backplane such that, when connected with the raxel, microIC may be used to electrically drive each one of the microLEDs of the raxel. In an embodiment, a plurality of chiplets are disposed on a display substrate to for an auto-view horizontal parallax only 3D display.
The appended drawings illustrate only some implementations and are therefore not to be considered limiting of scope.
The present invention is described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. In the drawings, the size and relative sizes of layers and regions may be exaggerated for clarity.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, third etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections, these elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element, component, region, layer or section from another region, layer or section. Thus, a first element, component, region, layer or section discussed below could be termed a second element, component, region, layer or section without departing from the teachings of the present invention.
Spatially relative terms, such as “beneath,” “below,” “lower,” “under,” “above,” “upper,” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” or “beneath” or “under” other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary terms “below” and “under” can encompass both an orientation of above and below. The device may be otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly. In addition, it will also be understood that when a layer is referred to as “between” two layers, it can be the only layer between the two layers, or one or more intervening layers may also be present.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “compromising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items, and may be abbreviated as “/”.
It will be understood that when an element or layer is referred to as being “on,” “connected to,” “coupled to,” or “adjacent to” another element or layer, it can be directly on, connected, coupled, or adjacent to the other element or layer, or intervening elements or layers may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on,” “directly connected to,” “directly coupled to,” or “immediately adjacent to” another element or layer, there are no intervening elements or layers present. Likewise, when light is received or provided “from” one element, it can be received or provided directly from that element or from an intervening element. On the other hand, when light is received or provided “directly from” one element, there are no intervening elements present.
Embodiments of the invention are described herein with reference to cross-section illustrations that are schematic illustrations of idealized embodiments (and intermediate structures) of the invention. As such, variations from the shapes of the illustrations as a result, for example, of manufacturing techniques and/or tolerances, are to be expected. Thus, embodiments of the invention should not be construed as limited to the particular shapes of regions illustrated herein but are to include deviations in shapes that result, for example, from manufacturing. Accordingly, the regions illustrated in the figures are schematic in nature and their shapes are not intended to illustrate the actual shape of a region of a device and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and/or the present specification and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
In order to produce a high brightness auto-viewed 3D HPO display (e.g., lenticular or raster barrier-based), the pixel density should be relatively high compared to the lens size and/or aperture spacing. Additionally, the luminous flux of the display should be equal to or greater than a 2D display counterpart. Such requirements are inherently impractical and conflicting for organic light-emitting diode (“OLED”) and liquid crystal-based displays (“LCDs”), as the minimum pixel size of such displays is constrained by the brightness requirements, pixel layer physics, practical circuit density limitations for the necessary thin film transistor (“TFT”) or low temperature polycrystalline silicon (“LTPS”) backplane circuitry and, in the case of LCDs, the basic need for a backlight for each pixel. For instance, for existing displays, these constraints, plus the TFT and LTPS scale constraints limit the size of a red-green-blue (“RGB”) pixel to approximately 30 microns by 30 microns (e.g., the Premium OLED display on the Sony Xperia Z5 phone), approximately 50 microns by 50 microns (e.g., the Liquid Retina display on the Apple iPhone 11), up to approximately 110 by 110 square microns (e.g., the Retina display on the Apple MacBook).
While the use of complementary metal-oxide-silicon (“CMOS”) backplanes can provide much higher density pixel-driving circuitry, beyond 10,000 pixels per square inch, silicon-based CMOS backplanes are more expensive than TFT or LTPS backplanes. It would not be cost effective to tile a large-scale LC or OLED display panel with a CMOS backplane. Furthermore, the mechanical tolerancing in the alignment of the high-density display pixels with respect to lenslets or apertures can be problematic. The lenslets or apertures are generally separately formed from the display pixels in large sheets using, for example, injection molding, extrusion, or printing techniques, and applied to the display pixels using for example, pressure-sensitive adhesives. All of these processes are subject to inherent limits on mechanical tolerancing on the order of several tens of microns. If the number of pixels behind each lens/aperture is limited and the ratio between the lens/aperture size and pixel size is in the single digits, then undesired artifacts related to misalignments between the lens/aperture and pixels cannot be compensated by calibration or by software. These problems are exacerbated by the usually large areas of displays compared to pixel and lens/aperture size, as tolerance errors accumulate from one side of the display to the other or from center to edge during manufacture. Combined with such manufacturability, brightness, and driving circuitry limitations, the path for producing high surface resolution, high angular resolution, and high brightness HPO auto-viewed 3D displays using existing technologies is difficult.
In contrast, inorganic micro light emitting diodes (microLEDs) are able to produce high luminance from small emission areas, and have been demonstrated as a viable display pixel source. See, for example, International Patent Publication Number WO 2019/209945 A1, WO 2019/209957 A1, and WO 2019/209961 to He et al., all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Emission flux from a single microLED emitter has been demonstrated to be orders of magnitude higher than an even larger area OLED device, and, similarly, higher than emission flux that is practically achievable with a transmissive LC and a backlight. Thus, the advent of smaller, higher density, brighter, and higher-efficiency emissive pixels allow unique solutions to the problems described above.
Whereas the size limit of visually-discernable pixels at a typical arm's length working distance is considered to be approximately 150 microns (i.e., corresponding to approximately 1 arcmin/pixel), a microLED provides extremely bright light emission at a fraction of the dimensions. For instance, a 10 micron by 10 micron square microLED can emit up to 1000× the luminous flux of a 10,000 square micron OLED or LC pixel (e.g., 500,000 nits compared to 500 nits). That is, the emitters within a microLED display may be spaced such that a full color red-green-blue (RGB) pixel unit can be located within a smaller pitch than 3 microns, where all three colors can be simultaneously and fundamentally emitted. Thus, even while maintaining an overall pixel size of 10,000 square microns, the microLED light emission area required is much smaller than for an OLED or LC pixel while similarly providing retinal-limited resolution and even higher luminous flux.
Taking advantage of the characteristics of microLEDs as described above, a new configuration for an auto-view HPO 3D display is disclosed.
Continuing to refer to
Finally, a plurality of chiplets 135 can be transferred to a display backplane to form a microLED display 140, a portion of which is shown in
While
The concept of chiplets, e.g., chiplet 135 is extended in an embodiment shown in
Continuing to refer to
Further details of an example of a chiplet used in combination with a microlens array is shown in
Additionally, chiplet 300 as shown in
Referring now to
In an embodiment, each microLED emitter has a pixel pitch on the order of a few microns (e.g., less than 10 microns, less than 5 microns, or less than 3 microns), raxel 320 is supported on an equally small CMOS backplane for addressing each microLED, and each chiplet is as small as 10 microns by 60 microns in area. The resulting chiplet 300 may include circuitry to interface with an addressing array on a display backplane (e.g., horizontal and vertical bus lines 412 and 414, respectively) using a specific communication protocol. Alternatively, each chiplet 300 may be configured to be addressable by simpler TFT or LTPS display drive circuitry, thus greatly reducing the cost and complexity of the resulting display over a comparable OLED or LC display. In some embodiments, drive circuitry may include one or more of decompression circuits, interpolator circuits, parallax sequencing circuits, or other circuits configured to provide processing functionality. Additionally, the remaining area of display backplane 410 that is not covered by chiplets 300 may be populated with additional electronic or optical components, such as sensors or transistors.
An alternative layout of a chiplet is shown in
In an embodiment, each pixel cell 500 has dimensions of 150 microns by 150 microns or smaller such that the pixel cell spans approximately one arcmin or less when viewed at a working distance of 500 millimeters away. Since the width of each lenslet 620 is below the perception limit of viewer 630 and the microLED emitters on each chiplet 510 are even smaller than the width of each lenslet 620, display 600 is capable of generating a plurality of directionally distinct output fields. Thus, display 600 operates to provide a surface resolution percept that is equivalent to state-of-the-art 2D display, with the ability to portray high quality, auto-viewed 3D images.
Alternative pixel configurations using linear chiplets similar to those shown in
Continuing to refer to
A further variation of the chiplet concept is shown in
The orthogonal orientation of first and second chiplets 1110A and 1110B, respectively, enables pixel 1100 to provide horizontal-only parallax 3D views even when the display is rotated. For example, if a display device incorporating an array of pixels 1100 also includes a gyroscope, the display device may only use first chiplet 1110A when the display device is being held in a first position and, when the display device senses it has been turned by 90-degrees into a second position, then the display device deactivates first chiplet 1110A and activates second chiplet 1110B. Such a feature would be applicable, for example, for a cellphone or a tablet to be able to provide auto-view horizontal-only parallax views when the device is being held in a portrait or landscape mode.
Additional real estate available in pixel 1100 may be used in a variety of ways. In an embodiment, pixel 1100 of
An alternative display architecture incorporating the chiplet concept is illustrated in
A side cross-sectional view of a portion of lenslet 1210 incorporating a chiplet 1220 is shown in
A top cross-sectional view of a different portion of the array of lenslets 1210 is shown in
In the arrangement illustrated in
Another arrangement of such integration of chiplets directly with lenslets is illustrated in
In contrast, if the flat display were formed of strips of lenslets integrating chiplets therein that are assembled column by column, as discussed above, then the orientation angle of each column of lenslets (and accordingly the orientation angle of the chiplets integrated therein) may be adjusted from the center of the display to the edges in order to mitigate the aberrations that result from the display architecture illustrated in
A further alternative would be to assemble the strips of lenslets integrating chiplets into a curved display. As shown in
Another display architecture is illustrated in
A top cross-sectional view of lenslet portion 1800 is shown in
While the above discussion focused on the consideration of lenslet or lenticular-based displays, it is recognized that the discussions are also readily applicable to parallax/raster barriers and aperture-based displays. The microLED chiplet approach for providing auto-viewed 3D displays fundamentally separates the large pixel bed of the display from the parallax-generating optics sheet by discretizing individual pixel cell emitters into their own modules. This approach in conjunction with high speed, high resolution pick-and-place assembly systems or monolithically integrated microLED fabrication, enables heretofore unavailable display structural and system architectures. The ratios between the size and pitch of the pixels, the size and pitch of the lenslet, the field of view (or distribution angle) of the lenslet, and the focal length of the lenslet may be adjusted and optimized for each display application, such as for small form factor wearable displays to ultra high resolution displays and large scale displays. Also, the positioning of the emitters within chiplets can be varied to meet the needs of the specific display system. For instance, nonlinear spacing of parallax views or compensation for optical distortion due to the lenslets may be achieved by appropriate microLED layout schemes.
Various alternative or additional configurations or components may be implemented in one or more of the optical systems described above. Accordingly, many different embodiments stem from the above description and the drawings. It will be understood that it would be unduly repetitious and obfuscating to literally describe and illustrate every combination and subcombination of these embodiments. As such, the present specification, including the drawings, shall be construed to constitute a complete written description of all combinations and subcombinations of the embodiments described herein, and of the manner and process of making and using them, and shall support claims to any such combination or subcombination.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/128,686 filed Dec. 21, 2020, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2403731 | MacNeille | Jul 1946 | A |
3936817 | Levy et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4432610 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4825201 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4923285 | Ogino et al. | May 1990 | A |
4996523 | Bell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5018838 | Barnes et al. | May 1991 | A |
5144418 | Brown et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5157387 | Momose et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5189406 | Humphries et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5317334 | Sano | May 1994 | A |
5359342 | Nakai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5471225 | Parks | Nov 1995 | A |
5473338 | Prince et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497172 | Doherty et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5537128 | Keene et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548347 | Melnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566010 | Ishii et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5602559 | Kimura | Feb 1997 | A |
5619228 | Doherty | Apr 1997 | A |
5731802 | Aras et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751264 | Cavallerano et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767832 | Koyama et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818413 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5905482 | Hughes et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926158 | Yoneda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926162 | Wood et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936603 | Lippmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936604 | Endou | Aug 1999 | A |
5945972 | Okumura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959598 | McKnight | Sep 1999 | A |
5969512 | Matsuyama | Oct 1999 | A |
5969701 | Numao et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986640 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005558 | Hudson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034659 | Wald et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046716 | McKnight | Apr 2000 | A |
6067065 | Worley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6121948 | Worley et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127991 | Uehara et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144356 | Weatherford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151011 | Worley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
RE37056 | Wortel et al. | Feb 2001 | E |
6201521 | Doherty | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6262703 | Perner | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285360 | Li | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297788 | Shigeta et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317112 | Handschy et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6369782 | Shigeta | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6424330 | Johnson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456267 | Sato et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476792 | Hattori et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6518945 | Pinkham | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567138 | Krusius et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587084 | Alymov et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603452 | Serita | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621488 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6690432 | Janssen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717561 | Pfeiffer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731306 | Booth et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744415 | Waterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762739 | Bone | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6784898 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788231 | Hsueh | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806871 | Yasue | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6831626 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850216 | Akimoto et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862012 | Funakoshi et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6924824 | Adachi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930667 | Ijima et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6930692 | Coker et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7066605 | Dewald et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067853 | Yao | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7088325 | Ishii | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7088329 | Hudson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7129920 | Chow | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7187355 | Tam et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7379043 | Worley et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397980 | Frisken | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7443374 | Hudson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468717 | Hudson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7692671 | Ng | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7852307 | Hudson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7990353 | Chow | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040311 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8111271 | Hudson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8264507 | Hudson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8421828 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8520114 | Cok et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8643681 | Endo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9047818 | Day et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9117746 | Clark et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9406269 | Lo et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9583031 | Hudson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9824619 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9918053 | Lo et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10437402 | Pan | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10957272 | Li et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20010013844 | Shigeta | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020024481 | Kawabe et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020041266 | Koyama et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020043610 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020135309 | Okuda | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140662 | Igarashi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158825 | Endo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030058195 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030156102 | Kimura | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174117 | Crossland et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030210257 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040032636 | Willis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040080482 | Magendanz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125090 | Hudson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174328 | Hudson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050001794 | Nakanishi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050001806 | Ohmura | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052437 | Hudson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057466 | Sala et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062765 | Hudson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088462 | Borel | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050195894 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200300 | Yumoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264586 | Kim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012589 | Hsieh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012594 | Worley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060066645 | Ng | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060147146 | Voigt et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060208961 | Nathan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060284903 | Ng | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284904 | Ng | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070252855 | Hudson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070252856 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007576 | Ishii et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080088613 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080158437 | Arai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080259019 | Ng | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090027360 | Kwan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027364 | Kwan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090115703 | Cok | May 2009 | A1 |
20090284671 | Leister | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303248 | Ng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100073270 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100214646 | Sugimoto et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100253995 | Reichelt | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295836 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110109299 | Chaji et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109670 | Sempel et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110199405 | Dallas et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110205100 | Bogaerts | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110227887 | Dallas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120086733 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113167 | Margerm et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120307123 | Cok | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130038585 | Kasai | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130113783 | Pourbigharaz | May 2013 | A1 |
20130293955 | Yang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308057 | Lu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140085426 | Leone et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092105 | Guttag et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150245038 | Clatanoff et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160203801 | De Groot et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160234487 | Kroon et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160365055 | Hudson et al. | Dec 2016 | A9 |
20170208319 | Kim et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170338542 | Cok | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180024384 | Tadokoro | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180061302 | Hu et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190066608 | Wantanabe | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190198561 | Wildeson et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190333443 | He | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190347994 | Lin et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200014904 | Wetzstein | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200098307 | Li et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200105653 | Elsherbini | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20210201771 | Li et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20220231006 | Diao et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
112014978 | Dec 2020 | CN |
0658870 | Jun 1995 | EP |
1187087 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2327798 | Feb 1999 | GB |
7049663 | Feb 1995 | JP |
2002116741 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2012089820 | May 2012 | JP |
2014527321 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2016539381 | Dec 2016 | JP |
227005 | Jul 1994 | TW |
407253 | Oct 2000 | TW |
418380 | Jan 2001 | TW |
482991 | Apr 2002 | TW |
483282 | Apr 2002 | TW |
200603192 | Jan 2006 | TW |
0070376 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0152229 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2007127849 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007127852 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2020128314 | Jun 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“2114A 1024 x4 Bit Static RAM”, Component Data Catalog, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA, USA, 1982, 7 pages. |
Amon, et al., “PTAT Sensors Based on SJFETs”, 10th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, MEleCon, vol. II, 2000, pp. 802-805. |
Anderson, et al., “Holographic Data Storage: Science Fiction or Science Fact”, Akonia Holographics LLC, presented at Optical Data Storage, 2014, 8 pages. |
Armitage, et al., “Introduction to Microdisplays”, John Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp. 182-185. |
“Sony 3D”, screen capture from video clip, 2009, 2 pages. |
Baker, “CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation”, IEEE Press Series on Microelectronic Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, 2010, pp. 614-616. |
Campardo, et al., “VLSI-Design of Non-Volatile Memories”, Springer, 2005, pp. 183-188. |
Colgan, et al., “On-Chip Metallization Layers for Reflective Light Waves”, Journal of Research Development, vol. 42, No. 3/4, May-Jul. 1998, pp. 339-345. |
CSE370, “Flip-Flops”, Lecture 14, https://studylib.net/doc/18055423/flip-flops, no date, pp. 1-17. |
Dai, et al., “Characteristics of LCoS Phase-only spatial light modulator and its applications”, Optics Communications vol. 238, especially section 3.2, 2004, pp. 269-276. |
Drabik, “Optically Interconnected Parallel Processor Arrays”, A Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Dec. 1989, pp. 121-126. |
Fuller, “Static Random Access Memory—SRAM”, Rochester Institute of technology to Microelectronic Engineering, Nov. 18, 2016, pp. 1-39. |
Hu, “Complementary MOS (CMOS) Technology”, Feb. 13, 2009, pp. 198-200. |
Jesacher, et al., “Broadband suppression of the zero diffraction order of an SLM using its extended phase modulation range”, Optics Express, vol. 22, No. 14, Jul. 14, 2014, pp. 17590-17599. |
Kang, et al., “Digital Driving of TN-LC for WUXGA LCOS Panel”, Digest of Technical Papers, Society for Information Display, 2001, pp. 1264-1267. |
Nakamura, et al., “Modified drive method for OCB LSD”, Proceeding of the International Display Research Conference, Society for Information Display, Campbell, CA, US, 1997, 4 pages. |
Ong, “Modern Mos Technology: Processes, Devices, and Design”, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984, pp. 207-212. |
Oton, et al., “Multipoint phase calibration for improved compensation of inherent wavefront distortion in parallel aligned liquid crystal on silicon display”, Applied Optics, vol. 46, No. 23, Optical Society of America, 2007, pp. 5667-5679. |
Pelgrom, et al., “Matching Properties of MOS Transistors”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 23, No. 5, Oct. 1989, 8 pages. |
Potter, et al., “Optical correlation using a phase-only liquid crystal over silicon spatial light modulator”, SPIE 1564 Opt. Info. Proc. Sys & Arch. III;, 1991, pp. 363-372. |
Product Description, “Westar's Microdisplay Inspection System”, www.westar.com/mdis, Jan. 2000, 2 pages. |
Rabaey, et al., “Digital Integrated Circuits”, A Design Perspective, Second Edition, Saurabh Printers Pvt. Ltd, 2016, pp. 138-140. |
Rabaey, “The Devices Chapter 3”, Jan. 18, 2002, pp. 121-124. |
Robinson, et al., “Polarization Engineering for LCD Projection”, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England, 2005, pp. 121-123. |
Sloof, et al., “An Improved WXGA LCOS Imager for Single Panel Systems”, Proceedings of the Asia Symposium on Information Display, Society for Information Display, Campbell, CA, US, 2004, 4 pages. |
SMPTE 274M-2005 , “1920×1080 Image Sample Structure, Digital Representation and Digital Timing Reference Sequences for Multiple Picture Rates”, SMPTE, White Plains, New York, US, 2005, 29 pages. |
Underwood, et al., “Evaluation of an nMOS VLSI array for an adaptive liquid-crystal spatial light modulator”, IEEE Proc, v.133 PI.J. No., Feb. 1986, 15 pages. |
Wang, “Studies of Liquid Crystal Response Time”, University of Central Florida, Doctoral Dissertation, 2005, 128 pages. |
Wu, “Discussion #9 MOSFETs”, University of California at Berkeley College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Spring 2008, pp. 1-7. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/064650, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 17, 2022, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220201275 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63128686 | Dec 2020 | US |