High-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet and method for producing the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12043884
  • Patent Number
    12,043,884
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 6, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 23, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
A high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet includes an electrolytic zinc-based coating on a base steel sheet, in which the base steel sheet has a predetermined composition and a steel microstructure in which the total area percentage of one or two of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 90% or more in the entire steel microstructure, the total area percentage of one or two of the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 80% or more in a region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is the U.S. National Phase application of PCT/JP2019/030793, filed Aug. 6, 2019, which claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-196591, filed Oct. 18, 2018, the disclosures of these applications being incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet and a method for producing the same. More specifically, the present invention relates to a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet used, for example, for automotive components and a method for producing the same, and in particular, to a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet excellent in bendability and a method for producing the same.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In recent years, efforts have been actively made to reduce the weight of vehicle bodies themselves. The thicknesses of steel sheets used for vehicle bodies have been reduced by increasing the strength of steel sheets. In particular, there have been advances in the use of high-strength steel sheets with 1,320 to 1,470 MPa-grade tensile strength (TS) to vehicle frame components, such as center pillar reinforcements (R/F), bumpers, and impact beam components (hereinafter, also referred to as “components”). Furthermore, from the viewpoint of further reducing the weight of automotive bodies, studies have been conducted on the use of sheets of TS 1,800 MPa (1.8 GPa) or higher grade steels. Additionally, from the viewpoint of workability, there is a growing demand for steel sheets with bendability.


With an increase in the strength of steel sheets, hydrogen embrittlement may occur. In recent years, it has been suggested that plating hinders the release of hydrogen that has entered a steel sheet during the production process of the steel sheet and there is the risk of a decrease in ductility, in particular, local ductility. It has also been suggested that the accumulation of hydrogen in steel around coarse carbides in a surface layer of steel promotes the occurrence of cracking upon working.


For example, Patent Literature 1 provides a high-strength steel sheet having a chemical composition containing C: 0.12% to 0.3%, Si: 0.5% or less, Mn: less than 1.5%, P: 0.02% or less, S: 0.01% or less, Al: 0.15% or less, and N: 0.01% or less, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities, the steel sheet having a single tempered martensite microstructure and a tensile strength of 1.0 to 1.8 GPa.


Patent Literature 2 provides a high-strength steel sheet composed of a steel having a chemical composition containing C: 0.17% to 0.73%, Si: 3.0% or less, Mn: 0.5% to 3.0%, P: 0.1% or less, S: 0.07% or less, Al: 3.0% or less, and N: 0.010% or less, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities, the steel sheet having a good balance between strength and ductility and a tensile strength of 980 MPa to 1.8 GPa, in which the increased strength of the steel sheet is obtained by the use of a martensite microstructure, retained austenite required to provide the TRIP effect is stably provided by the use of upper bainite transformation, and martensite is partially transformed into tempered martensite.


PATENT LITERATURE



  • PTL 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2011-246746

  • PTL 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2010-90475



SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In the technique disclosed in Patent Literature 1, although the single tempered martensite microstructure results in excellent strength, inclusions and coarse carbides that promote crack growth cannot be reduced; thus, the steel sheet is not considered to be excellent in bendability.


In the technique disclosed in Patent Literature 2, although there is no description of bendability, austenite having an fcc structure has a larger amount of hydrogen dissolved therein than martensite and bainite having a body-centered cubic (bcc) structure or a body-centered tetragonal (bct) structure; thus, the steel specified in Patent Literature 2, which contains a large amount of austenite, seemingly contains a large amount of diffusible hydrogen therein and is not considered to be excellent in bendability.


Aspects of the present invention aim to provide a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet having excellent bendability and a method for producing the steel sheet.


In accordance with aspects of the present invention, the term “high-ductility, high-strength” refers to a tensile strength (TS) of 1,320 MPa or more, an elongation (El) of 7.0% or more, and TS×El=12,000 or more. The term “excellent (in) bendability” indicates that limit bending radius/thickness (R/t) is 4.0 or less in a predetermined bending test.


In an electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet, a surface of a base steel sheet refers to the interface between the base steel sheet and an electrolytic zinc-based coating.


A region extending from a surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet is also referred to as a “surface layer portion”.


Aspects of the present invention provide a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet containing a predetermined amount of fine carbides in a surface layer portion to reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel and thus having excellent bendability, and a method for producing the steel sheet.


Specifically, a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention includes a layer of electrolytic zinc-based coating on a surface of a base steel sheet and has a steel microstructure in which the total area percentage of one or two of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 90% or more in the entire steel microstructure, the total area percentage of one or two of the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 80% or more in a region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet, and the total perimeter of individual carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the region is 50 μm/mm2 or more, and the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel is 0.20 ppm or less by mass, the tensile strength (TS) is 1,320 MPa or more, the elongation (El) is 7.0% or more, TS×El is 12,000 or more, and R/t is 4.0 or less.


The inventors have conducted intensive studies in order to solve the foregoing problems and have found that the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel needs to be reduced to 0.20 ppm by mass or less in order to obtain excellent bendability. To reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel, fine carbides serving as hydrogen-trapping sites need to be increased in a surface layer portion of steel. To this end, it is necessary to prevent decarburization. The following have also been found: Decarburization is suppressed by adjusting the component composition of steel and shortening a residence time from the completion of finish rolling to coiling; thus, an electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet having excellent bendability is successfully produced. A microstructure mainly containing martensite and bainite results in high ductility and high strength. The outline of aspects of the present invention is described below.


[1] A high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet includes an electrolytic zinc-based coating on a surface of a base steel sheet,


in which the base steel sheet has a component composition containing, on a percent by mass basis,

    • C: 0.12% or more and 0.40% or less,
    • Si: 0.001% or more and 2.0% or less,
    • Mn: 1.7% or more and 5.0% or less,
    • P: 0.050% or less,
    • S: 0.0050% or less,
    • Al: 0.010% or more and 0.20% or less,
    • N: 0.010% or less, and
    • Sb: 0.002% or more and 0.10% or less, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities; and
    • a steel microstructure in which the total area percentage of one or two of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 90% or more in the entire steel microstructure, the total area percentage of one or two of the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 80% or more in a region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet, and the total perimeter of individual carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the region is 50 μm/mm2 or more,
    • in which the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel is 0.20 ppm or less by mass.


[2] In the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in [1], the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis:

    • B: 0.0002% or more and less than 0.0035%.


[3] In the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in [1] or [2], the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis, one or two selected from:

    • Nb: 0.002% or more and 0.08% or less, and
    • Ti: 0.002% or more and 0.12% or less.


[4] In the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in any of [1] to [3], the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis, one or two selected from:

    • Cu: 0.005% or more and 1% or less, and
    • Ni: 0.01% or more and 1% or less.


[5] In the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in any of [1] to [4], the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis, one or two or more selected from:

    • Cr: 0.01% or more and 1.0% or less,
    • Mo: 0.01% or more and less than 0.3%,
    • V: 0.003% or more and 0.5% or less,
    • Zr: 0.005% or more and 0.2% or less, and
    • W: 0.005% or more and 0.2% or less.


[6] In the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in any of [1] to [5], the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis, one or two or more selected from:

    • Ca: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less,
    • Ce: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less,
    • La: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, and
    • Mg: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less.


[7] In the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in any of [1] to [6], the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis:

    • Sn: 0.002% or more and 0.1% or less.


[8] A method for producing a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet includes:

    • a hot-rolling step of hot-rolling a steel slab having the component composition described in any of [1] to [7] at a slab heating temperature of 1,200° C. or higher and a finish hot-rolling temperature of 840° C. or higher, performing cooling to a primary cooling stop temperature of 700° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 40° C./s or more in a temperature range of the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C., performing cooling at an average cooling rate of 2° C./s or more in a temperature range of the primary cooling stop temperature to 650° C., performing cooling to a coiling temperature of 630° C. or lower, and performing coiling;
    • an annealing step of heating a steel sheet after the hot-rolling step to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point or performing heating to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point and performing soaking, performing cooling to a cooling stop temperature of 350° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 3° C./s or more in a temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C., and performing holding at a holding temperature in a temperature range of 100° C. to 200° C. for 20 to 1,500 seconds; and a coating treatment step of cooling the steel sheet after the annealing step to room temperature and subjecting the steel sheet to electrolytic zinc-based coating for an electroplating time of 300 seconds or less.


[9] The method for producing a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in [8] further includes, after the hot-rolling step, a cold-rolling step of cold-rolling the steel sheet between the hot-rolling step and the annealing step.


[10] The method for producing a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet described in [8] or [9] further includes a tempering step of holding the steel sheet after the coating treatment step in a temperature range of 250° C. or lower for a holding time t that satisfies formula (1) below:

(T+273)(log t+4)≤2,700  (1)

where in formula (1), T is a holding temperature (° C.) in the tempering step, and t is the holding time (s) in the tempering step.


Aspects of the present invention provide a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet having excellent bendability by adjusting the component composition and the production method so as to suppress decarburization in the surface layer portion, increase the amount of fine carbides in the surface layer portion, and reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel.


The use of the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention for automotive structural members can achieve both an increase in the strength and an improvement in bendability of automotive steel sheets. In other words, according to aspects of the present invention, the performance of automotive bodies is improved.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have conducted various studies in order to solve the foregoing problems and have found that a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet having excellent bendability is obtained, the steel sheet having a predetermined component composition and a steel microstructure in which the total area percentage of one or two of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 90% or more in the entire microstructure of the steel sheet, the total area percentage of one or two of the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 80% or more in a region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet, and the total of the perimeter (total perimeter) of individual carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the region is 50 μm/mm2 or more, and the amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel is 0.20 ppm or less by mass. These findings have led to the completion of the present invention.


Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. The present invention is not limited to the embodiments described below.


A high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention includes a layer of electrolytic zinc-based coating on a surface of a steel sheet serving as a base (base steel sheet).


The component composition of the base steel sheet (hereinafter, also referred to simply as a “steel sheet”) according to aspects of the present invention will first be described. In the description of the component composition, each component content is expressed in units of “%” that indicates “% by mass”.


C: 0.12% or More and 0.40% or Less


C is an element that improves hardenability, and is incorporated from the viewpoint of achieving a predetermined area percentage of martensite and/or bainite and increasing the strength of martensite and bainite to ensure TS 1,320 MPa. Finely dispersed carbides trap hydrogen in steel to reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel, thereby improving the bendability. When the C content is less than 0.12%, fine carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel cannot be ensured; thus, excellent bendability cannot be maintained. Accordingly, the C content is 0.12% or more. From the viewpoint of achieving higher TS, such as TS 1,470 MPa, the C content is preferably more than 0.16%, more preferably 0.18% or more. When the C content is more than 0.40%, carbides in martensite and bainite coarsen. The presence of the coarse carbides in the surface layer portion causes the coarse carbides to act as the starting points of bent cracks, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the C content is 0.40% or less. The C content is preferably 0.30% or less, more preferably 0.25% or less.


Si: 0.001% or More and 2.0% or Less


Si is an element that contributes to strengthening by solid-solution strengthening. When a steel sheet is held in a temperature range of 200° C. or higher, Si suppresses the excessive formation of coarse carbides to contribute to an improvement in bendability. Si also reduces the segregation of Mn in the middle portion of the sheet in the thickness direction to contribute to the suppression of the formation of MnS. Additionally, Si contributes to the suppression of decarburization and deboronization due to the oxidation of the surface layer portion of the steel sheet during continuous annealing. To sufficiently provide the effects described above, the Si content is 0.001% or more. The Si content is preferably 0.003% or more, more preferably 0.005% or more. An excessively high Si content results in the extension of the segregation in the thickness direction to easily form coarse MnS in the thickness direction, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Additionally, the formation of carbides is suppressed; thus, the absence of fine carbides increases the amount of diffusible hydrogen at the surface layer in the steel, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the Si content is 2.0% or less. The Si content is preferably 1.5% or less, more preferably 1.2% or less.


Mn: 1.7% or More and 5.0% or Less


Mn is incorporated in order to improve the hardenability of the steel and obtain a predetermined area percentage of martensite and/or bainite. A Mn content of less than 1.7% results in the formation of ferrite in the surface layer portion of the steel sheet to decrease the strength. Additionally, the absence of fine carbides in the surface layer portion increases the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the surface layer portion of the steel to deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, Mn needs to be contained in an amount of 1.7% or more. The Mn content is preferably 2.4% or more, more preferably 2.8% or more. An excessively high Mn content may result in the increase of coarse carbides in the surface layer portion to significantly deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, the Mn content is 5.0% or less. The Mn content is preferably 4.8% or less, more preferably 4.4% or less.


P: 0.050% or Less


P is an element that strengthens steel. At a high P content, the occurrence of cracking is promoted. Thus, even in the case of a small amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel, the bendability is significantly deteriorated. Accordingly, the P content is 0.050% or less. The P content is preferably 0.030% or less, more preferably 0.010% or less. The lower limit of the P content is not particularly limited. Currently, the industrially feasible lower limit is about 0.003%.


S: 0.0050% or Less


S significantly adversely affects the bendability through the formation of inclusions, such as MnS, TiS, and Ti(C,S). To reduce the harmful effect of these inclusions, the S content needs to be 0.0050% or less. The S content is preferably 0.0020% or less, more preferably 0.0010% or less, even more preferably 0.0005% or less. The lower limit of the S content is not particularly limited. Currently, the industrially feasible lower limit is about 0.0002%.


Al: 0.010% or More and 0.20% or Less


Al is added in order to sufficiently perform deoxidation to reduce coarse inclusions in the steel. The effect is provided at 0.010% or more. The Al content is preferably 0.015% or more. At an Al content of more than 0.20%, carbides mainly containing Fe, such as cementite, formed during coiling after hot rolling do not easily dissolve in an annealing step; thus, coarse inclusions and coarse carbides are formed to deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, the Al content is 0.20% or less. The Al content is preferably 0.17% or less, more preferably 0.15% or less.


N: 0.010% or Less


N is an element that forms coarse nitride- and carbonitride-based inclusions, such as TiN, (Nb,Ti) (C,N), AlN, in the steel, and deteriorates the bendability through the formation of these inclusions. To prevent the deterioration of the bendability, the N content needs to be 0.010% or less. The N content is preferably 0.007% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less. The lower limit of the N content is not particularly limited. Currently, the industrially feasible lower limit is about 0.0006%.


Sb: 0.002% or More and 0.10% or Less


Sb suppresses the oxidation and nitriding of the surface layer portion of the steel sheet to suppress decarburization due to the oxidation and nitriding in the surface layer portion of the steel sheet. The suppression of decarburization suppresses the formation of ferrite in the surface layer portion of the steel sheet, thereby contributing to an increase in strength. Additionally, fine carbides can be provided in the surface layer portion of the steel to reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the surface layer portion of the steel. From this point of view, Sb needs to be contained in an amount of 0.002% or more. The Sb content is preferably 0.004% or more, more preferably 0.007% or more. When Sb is contained in an amount of more than 0.10%, Sb segregates at prior y grain boundaries to promote the occurrence of cracking, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the Sb content is 0.10% or less. The Sb content is preferably 0.08% or less, more preferably 0.06% or less.


The steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention has a component composition having the foregoing components, the balance being Fe (iron) and incidental impurities. The steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention preferably has the component composition, having the foregoing components and the balance Fe and incidental impurities. The steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention may further contain the following components as optional components. In the case where the optional components are contained in amounts of less than the lower limits, the components are contained as incidental impurities.


B: 0.0002% or More and Less Than 0.0035%


B is an element that improves the hardenability of steel, and has the advantage that martensite and bainite having predetermined area percentages are formed even in the case of a low Mn content. To provide the effects of B, B is preferably contained in an amount of 0.0002% or more. The B content is more preferably 0.0005% or more, even more preferably 0.0007% or more. From the viewpoint of immobilizing N, B is preferably added in combination with 0.002% or more of Ti. A B content of 0.0035% or more results in a decrease in dissolution rate of cementite during annealing to leave carbides mainly containing Fe, such as undissolved cementite. This leads to the formation of coarse inclusions and carbides, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the B content is preferably less than 0.0035%. The B content is more preferably 0.0030% or less, even more preferably 0.0025% or less.


One or Two Selected from Nb: 0.002% or More and 0.08% or Less and Ti: 0.002% or More and 0.12% or Less


Nb and Ti contribute to an increase in strength through a reduction in the size of prior y grains. Fine Nb and Ti carbides formed serve as hydrogen-trapping sites to reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel, thereby improving the bendability. From this point of view, each of Nb and Ti is preferably contained in an amount of 0.002% or more. Each of the Nb content and the Ti content is more preferably 0.003% or more, even more preferably 0.005% or more. When large amounts of Nb and Ti are contained, coarse Nb-based precipitates remaining undissolved, such as NbN, Nb(C,N), and (Nb,Ti) (C,N), and coarse Ti-based precipitates, such as TiN, Ti(C,N), Ti(C,S), and TiS, are increased during heating of the slab in the hot-rolling step to deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, Nb is preferably contained in an amount of 0.08% or less. The Nb content is more preferably 0.06% or less, even more preferably 0.04% or less. Ti is preferably contained in an amount of 0.12% or less. The Ti content is more preferably 0.10% or less, even more preferably 0.08% or less.


One or two Selected from Cu: 0.005% or More and 1% or Less and Ni: 0.01% or More and 1% or Less


Cu and Ni are effective in improving the corrosion resistance in an environment in which automobiles are used and suppressing hydrogen entry into the steel sheet by allowing corrosion products to cover the surfaces of the steel sheet. From this point of view, Cu is preferably contained in an amount of 0.005% or more. Ni is preferably contained in an amount of 0.01% or more. From the viewpoint of improving the bendability, each of Cu and Ni is more preferably contained in an amount of 0.05% or more, even more preferably 0.08% or more. However, excessively large amounts of Cu and Ni lead to the occurrence of surface defects to deteriorate coatability and chemical conversion treatability. Accordingly, each of the Cu content and the Ni content is preferably 1% or less. Each of the Cu content and the Ni content is more preferably 0.8% or less, even more preferably 0.6% or less.


One or Two or More Selected from Cr: 0.01% or More and 1.0% or Less, Mo: 0.01% or More and Less Than 0.3%, V: 0.003% or More and 0.5% or Less, Zr: 0.005% or More and 0.2% or Less, and W: 0.005% or More and 0.2% or Less


Cr, Mo, and V may be incorporated in order to improve the hardenability of steel. To provide the effect, each of Cr and Mo is preferably contained in an amount of 0.01% or more. Each of the Cr content and the Mo content is more preferably 0.02% or more, even more preferably 0.03% or more. V is preferably contained in an amount of 0.003% or more. The V content is more preferably 0.005% or more, even more preferably 0.007% or more. However, an excessively large amount of any of Cr, Mo, and V leads to coarsening of carbides, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the Cr content is preferably 1.0% or less. The Cr content is more preferably 0.4% or less, even more preferably 0.2% or less. The Mo content is preferably less than 0.3%. The Mo content is more preferably 0.2% or less, even more preferably 0.1% or less. The V content is preferably 0.5% or less. The V content is more preferably 0.4% or less, even more preferably 0.3% or less.


Zr and W contribute to an increase in strength through a reduction in the size of prior y grains. From this point of view, each of Zr and W is preferably contained in an amount of 0.005% or more. Each of the Zr content and the W content is more preferably 0.006% or more, even more preferably 0.007% or more. However, when large amounts of Zr and W are contained, coarse precipitates remaining undissolved are increased during heating of the slab in the hot-rolling step to deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, each of Zr and W is preferably contained in an amount of 0.2% or less. Each of the Zr content and the W content is more preferably 0.15% or less, even more preferably 0.1% or less.


One or Two or More Selected from Ca: 0.0002% or More and 0.0030% or Less, Ce: 0.0002% or More and 0.0030% or Less, La: 0.0002% or More and 0.0030% or Less, and Mg: 0.0002% or More and 0.0030% or Less


Ca, Ce, and La immobilize S in the form of sulfide, serve as hydrogen-trapping sites in steel, and reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel to contribute to an improvement in bendability. For this reason, each of the Ca content, the Ce content, and the La content is preferably 0.0002% or more. Each of the Ca content, the Ce content, and the La content is more preferably 0.0003% or more, even more preferably 0.0005% or more. The addition of large amounts of Ca, Ce, and La coarsens sulfides to deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, each of the Ca content, the Ce content, and the La content is preferably 0.0030% or less. Each of the Ca content, the Ce content, and the La content is more preferably 0.0020% or less, even more preferably 0.0010% or less.


Mg immobilizes 0 in the form of MgO, serves as a hydrogen-trapping site in steel, and reduces the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel to contribute to an improvement in bendability. Accordingly, the Mg content is preferably 0.0002% or more. The Mg content is more preferably 0.0003% or more, even more preferably 0.0005% or more. The addition of a large amount of Mg coarsens MgO to deteriorate the bendability. Thus, the Mg content is preferably 0.0030% or less. The Mg content is more preferably 0.0020% or less, even more preferably 0.0010% or less.


Sn: 0.002% or More and 0.1% or Less


Sn suppresses the oxidation and nitriding of the surface layer portion of the steel sheet to suppress decarburization due to the oxidation and nitriding in the surface layer portion of the steel sheet. The suppression of decarburization suppresses the formation of ferrite in the surface layer portion of the steel sheet, thereby contributing to an increase in strength. Additionally, fine carbides can be provided in the surface layer portion of the steel to reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the surface layer portion of the steel. From this point of view, Sn is preferably contained in an amount of 0.002% or more. The Sn content is more preferably 0.003% or more, even more preferably 0.004% or more. When Sn is contained in an amount of more than 0.1%, Sn segregates at prior y grain boundaries to promote the occurrence of cracking, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the Sn is contained in an amount of 0.1% or less. The Sn content is more preferably 0.08% or less, even more preferably 0.06% or less.


Amount of Diffusible Hydrogen in Steel of 0.20 ppm or Less by Mass


The amount of diffusible hydrogen in accordance with aspects of the present invention indicates the cumulative amount of hydrogen released from a heating start temperature (25° C.) to 200° C. when heating is performed at a rate of temperature increase of 200° C./h with a thermal desorption spectroscopy system immediately after removal of the coating from the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet. When the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel is more than 0.20 ppm by mass, cracking is promoted during bending to deteriorate the bendability. Accordingly, the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel is 0.20 ppm or less by mass. The amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel is preferably 0.17 ppm or less by mass, more preferably 0.13 ppm or less by mass. The lower limit of the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel is not particularly limited and may be 0 ppm by mass. As the value of the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel, a value obtained by a measurement method described in Examples is used. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel needs to be 0.20 ppm or less by mass before forming or welding the steel sheet. Regarding a product (member) after forming or welding the steel sheet, in the case where a sample is cut out from the product placed in a common use environment and then the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel is measured and found to be 0.20 ppm or less by mass, the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel can be regarded as 0.20 ppm or less by mass even before forming or welding.


The microstructure of the steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention will be described below.


Total Area Percentage of One or Two of Martensite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less and Bainite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less Is 90% or More


To obtain high strength of TS 1,320 MPa, the total area percentage of one or two of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 90% or more with respect to the entire steel microstructure. At less than this value, ferrite is increased to deteriorate the strength. The total area percentage of the martensite and the bainite may be 100% with respect to the entire steel microstructure. The area percentage of one of the martensite and the bainite may be in the above range, and the total area percentage of both of them may be in the above range. The martensite is defined as the total of as-quenched martensite and tempered martensite. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, martensite refers to a hard microstructure formed from austenite at a low temperature (martensitic transformation temperature or lower). Tempered martensite refers to a microstructure that has been subjected to tempering at the time of reheating martensite. Bainite refers to a hard microstructure in which fine carbides are dispersed in acicular or plate-like ferrite and which is formed from austenite at a relatively low temperature (martensite transformation temperature or higher).


The residual microstructure other than the martensite or the bainite includes, for example, ferrite, pearlite, and retained austenite. When the total amount thereof is, by area percentage, 10% or less, the residual microstructure is allowable. The area percentage of the residual microstructure may be 0%. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, ferrite refers to a microstructure that is formed by transformation from austenite at a relatively high temperature and that is grains with a bcc lattice. Pearlite refers to a layered microstructure composed of layers of ferrite and cementite. Retained austenite refers to austenite that does not transform to martensite when a martensitic transformation temperature is equal to or lower than room temperature. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, the area percentage of each phase in the steel microstructure is determined by a method described in Examples.


Total Area Percentage of One or Two of Martensite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less and Bainite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less in Region Extending from Surface of Base Steel Sheet to Depth of ⅛ of Thickness of Base Steel Sheet Is 80% or More


Cracking due to bending occurs from a surface layer in a ridge line portion formed by bending of a plated steel sheet; thus, the microstructure of the surface layer portion of the steel sheet is significantly important. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, the use of fine carbides in the surface layer portion as a hydrogen-trapping site reduces the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the vicinity of the surface layer of the steel to improve the bendability. Accordingly, in the case where the total area percentage of one or two of the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in a region extending from a surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet is 80% or more, desired bendability can be ensured. The area percentage is preferably 82% or more, more preferably 85% or more. The upper limit of the area percentage is not particularly limited and may be 100%. In the region described above, one of the martensite and the bainite may be in the above range, and the total area percentage of both of them may be in the above range.


Total Perimeter of Individual Carbide Particles Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less in Martensite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less and Bainite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less Present in Region Extending from Surface of Base Steel Sheet to Depth of ⅛ of Thickness of Base Steel Sheet Is 50 μm/mm2 or More


The amount of diffusible hydrogen in the surface layer portion of the steel is reduced by an increase in the surface area of fine carbide particles present in the vicinity of the surface layer. Thus, the increase in the surface area of fine carbide particles is important. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, as an index of the surface area of fine carbide particles, perimeters of fine carbide particles are used. The total perimeter of carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in a region extending from a surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet is 50 μm/mm2 or more (50 μm or more per 1 mm2). The total perimeter of the carbide particles is preferably 55 μm/mm2 or more, more preferably 60 μm/mm2 or more. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, the total perimeter of the carbide particles is determined by a method described in Examples.


The high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention includes an electrolytic zinc-based coating on a surface of a steel sheet serving as a base (base steel sheet). The type of the zinc-based coating is not particularly limited and may be, for example, a zinc coating (pure Zn) or a zinc alloy coating (e.g., Zn—Ni, Zn—Fe, Zn—Mn, Zn—Cr, or Zn—Co). The coating weight of the electrolytic zinc-based coating is preferably 25 g/m2 or more per one surface from the viewpoint of improving corrosion resistance. The coating weight of the electrolytic zinc-based coating is preferably 50 g/m2 or less per one surface from the viewpoint of not deteriorating the bendability. The high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention may include the electrolytic zinc-based coating on one surface of the base steel sheet or may include the electrolytic zinc-based coating on each surface of the base steel sheet. The high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention preferably includes the electrolytic zinc-based coating on each surface of the base steel sheet when used for automobiles.


The high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention has a tensile strength of 1,320 MPa or more. The tensile strength is preferably 1,400 MPa or more, more preferably 1,470 MPa or more, even more preferably 1,600 MPa or more. The upper limit of the tensile strength is preferably, but not necessarily, 2,200 MPa or less from the viewpoint of easily achieving a balance with other characteristics.


The high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention has an elongation (El) of 7.0% or more. The elongation is preferably 7.2% or more, more preferably 7.5% or more. Additionally, TS (MPa)×El (%) is 12,000 or more. TS×El is preferably 13,000 or more, more preferably 13,500 or more. Each of the tensile strength (TS) and the elongation (El) is measured by a method described in Examples.


The limit bending radius/thickness (R/t) of the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to aspects of the present invention is 4.0 or less in a predetermined bending test (bending test described in Examples). R/t is preferably 3.8 or less, more preferably 3.6 or less.


A method for producing a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below.


The method for producing a high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention includes at least a hot-rolling step, an annealing step, and a coating treatment step. Additionally, a cold-rolling step may be included between the hot-rolling step and the annealing step. A tempering step may be included after the coating treatment step. These steps will be described below. A temperature described below refers to the surface temperature of a slab, a steel sheet, or the like.


(Hot-Rolling Step)


Slab Heating Temperature


A steel slab having the component composition described above is subjected to hot rolling. The use of a slab heating temperature of 1,200° C. or higher promotes the dissolution of sulfide and reduces the segregation of Mn to reduce the amounts of coarse inclusions described above, thereby improving the bendability. For this reason, the slab heating temperature is 1,200° C. or higher. The slab heating temperature is more preferably 1,230° C. or higher, even more preferably 1,250° C. or higher. For example, the heating rate during heating of the slab may be 5 to 15° C./min, and the slab soaking time may be 30 to 100 minutes.


Finish Hot-Rolling Temperature


The finish hot-rolling temperature needs to be 840° C. or higher. At a finish hot-rolling temperature of lower than 840° C., it takes time to reduce the temperature. This may form inclusions to deteriorate the bendability and deteriorate the quality of the inside of the steel sheet. Additionally, decarburization at a surface layer decreases the area percentages of bainite and martensite containing carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel to decrease fine carbides serving as hydrogen-trapping sites in the vicinity of the surface layer, thereby making it difficult to ensure desired bendability. Accordingly, the finish hot-rolling temperature needs to be 840° C. or higher. The finish hot-rolling temperature is preferably 860° C. or higher. The upper limit of the finish hot-rolling temperature is preferably, but not necessarily, 950° C. or lower because a difficulty lies in cooling to a coiling temperature described below. The finish hot-rolling temperature is more preferably 920° C. or lower.


After the completion of the finish hot rolling, cooling is performed to a primary cooling stop temperature of 700° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 40° C./s or more in a temperature range of the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C. A low cooling rate results in the formation of inclusions. An increase in the size of the inclusions deteriorates the bendability. Decarburization at the surface layer decreases area percentages of martensite and bainite containing carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel to decrease fine carbides serving as hydrogen-trapping sites in the vicinity of the surface layer, thereby making it difficult to ensure desired bendability. Accordingly, after the completion of the finish hot rolling, the average cooling rate is 40° C./s or more from the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C. The average cooling rate is preferably 50° C./s or more. The upper limit of the average cooling rate is preferably, but not necessarily, about 250° C./s. The primary cooling stop temperature is 700° C. or lower. At a primary cooling stop temperature of higher than 700° C., carbides are easily formed down to 700° C. The coarsening of the carbides deteriorates the bendability. The lower limit of the primary cooling stop temperature is not particularly limited. At a primary cooling stop temperature of 650° C. or lower, the effect of rapid cooling on the suppression of carbide formation is decreased. Thus, the primary cooling stop temperature is preferably higher than 650° C.


After that, cooling is performed at an average cooling rate of 2° C./s or more in a temperature range of the primary cooling stop temperature to 650° C., and then cooling is performed to a coiling temperature of 630° C. or lower. A low cooling rate to 650° C. results in the formation of inclusions. An increase in the size of the inclusions deteriorates the bendability. Decarburization at the surface layer decreases area percentages of martensite and bainite containing carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel to decrease fine carbides serving as hydrogen-trapping sites in the vicinity of the surface layer, thereby making it difficult to ensure desired bendability. Accordingly, as described above, after cooling is performed to a primary cooling stop temperature of 700° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 40° C./s or more in the temperature range down to 700° C., the average cooling rate is 2° C./s or more in the temperature range of the primary cooling stop temperature to 650° C. The average cooling rate is preferably 3° C./s or more, more preferably 5° C./s. The average cooling rate from 650° C. to the coiling temperature is preferably, but not necessarily, 0.1° C./s or more and 100° C./s or less.


The coiling temperature is 630° C. or lower. A coiling temperature of higher than 630° C. may result in decarburization at the surface of base steel to lead to a difference in microstructure between the inside and the surface of the steel sheet, causing a nonuniformity in alloy concentration. Additionally, decarburization at the surface layer decreases area percentages of martensite and bainite containing carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel to decrease fine carbides serving as hydrogen-trapping sites in the vicinity of the surface layer, thereby making it difficult to ensure desired bendability. Accordingly, the coiling temperature is 630° C. or lower. The coiling temperature is preferably 600° C. or lower. The lower limit of the coiling temperature is not particularly limited. To prevent a decrease in cold rollability when cold rolling is performed, the coiling temperature is preferably 500° C. or higher.


Cold-Rolling Step


After the hot-rolling step, a cold-rolling step may be performed. In the case where the cold-rolling step is performed, in the cold-rolling step, the steel sheet (hot-rolled steel sheet) coiled in the hot-rolled step is subjected to pickling and then cold rolling to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet. The conditions of the pickling are not particularly limited. The rolling reduction is not particularly limited. At a rolling reduction of less than 20%, the surfaces may have poor flatness to lead to a nonuniform microstructure. Thus, the rolling reduction is preferably 20% or more. The cold-rolling step may be omitted as long as the microstructure and the mechanical properties satisfy the requirements of the present invention.


(Annealing Step)


The steel sheet that has been subjected to the hot-rolling step or the cold-rolling step subsequent to the hot-rolling step is heated to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point. An annealing temperature of lower than the AC3 point results in the formation of ferrite in the microstructure to fail to obtain desired strength. Accordingly, the annealing temperature is the AC3 point or higher. The annealing temperature is preferably the AC3 point+10° C. or higher, more preferably the AC3 point+20° C. or higher. The upper limit of the annealing temperature is not particularly limited. From the viewpoint of suppressing the coarsening of austenite to prevent the deterioration of the bendability, the annealing temperature is preferably 900° C. or lower. The atmosphere during annealing is not particularly limited. From the viewpoint of preventing decarburization in the surface layer portion, the dew point is preferably −50° C. or higher and −5° C. or lower.


The AC3 point (° C.) used here is calculated from the following formula. In the formula, each (% symbol of element) refers to the amount of the corresponding element contained (% by mass).

AC3 point=910-203(% C)1/2+45(% Si)−30(% Mn)−20(% Cu)−15(% Ni)+11(% Cr)+32(% Mo)+104(% V)+400(% Ti)+460(% Al)


After heating is performed to the annealing temperature equal to or higher than the AC3 point, cooling is performed to a cooling stop temperature of 350° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 3° C./s or more in a temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C., and holding is performed at a holding temperature in a temperature range of 100° C. to 200° C. for 20 to 1,500 seconds. After heating to the annealing temperature equal to or higher than the AC3 point, soaking may be performed at the annealing temperature. The soaking time here is preferably, but not necessarily, 10 seconds or more and 300 seconds or less, more preferably 15 seconds or more and 250 seconds or less. An average cooling rate of less than 3° C./s in the temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C. leads to excessive formation of ferrite to make it difficult to obtain desired strength. Additionally, the formation of ferrite in the surface layer portion makes it difficult to increase the fractions of the martensite and bainite containing carbides in the vicinity of the surface layer, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the average cooling rate in the temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C. is 3° C./s or more, preferably 5° C./s or more, more preferably 10° C./s or more.


The cooling stop temperature is 350° C. or lower. A cooling stop temperature of higher than 350° C. results in the formation of bainite containing coarse carbides to decrease the amount of fine carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel, thereby deteriorating the bendability.


The average cooling rate is defined by (the cooling start temperature−the cooling stop temperature)/the cooling time from the cooling start temperature to the cooling stop temperature, unless otherwise specified.


Then holding is performed at a holding temperature in the temperature range of 100° C. to 200° C. for 20 to 1,500 seconds. The carbides distributed in the bainite are carbides formed during the holding in the low temperature range after quenching and serve as hydrogen-trapping sites to trap hydrogen, and can prevent the deterioration of the bendability. When the holding temperature is lower than 100° C. or when the holding time is less than 20 seconds, bainite is not formed, and as-quenched martensite containing no carbide is formed. Thus, the amount of fine carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel is decreased to fail to provide the above effect. When the holding temperature is higher than 200° C. or when the holding time is more than 1,500 seconds, decarburization occurs, and coarse carbides are formed in the bainite, thereby deteriorating the bendability. The holding temperature is preferably 120° C. or higher. The holding temperature is preferably 180° C. or lower. The holding time is preferably 50 seconds or more. The holding time is preferably 1,000 seconds or less.


After the annealing step, cooling is performed to room temperature. The cooling rate at this time is not particularly limited. Down to 50° C., the average cooling rate is preferably 1° C./s or more. The term “room temperature” indicates, for example, 10° C. to 30° C.


(Coating Treatment Step)


After cooling to room temperature, the steel sheet is subjected to electrolytic zinc-based coating. The type of the electrolytic zinc-based coating may be, but is not particularly limited to, any of pure Zn, Zn—Ni, Zn—Fe, Zn—Mn, Zn—Cr, Zn—Co, and so forth. To suppress the entry of hydrogen into the steel and to achieve the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel of the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet to 0.20 ppm or less by mass, the electroplating time is important. At an electroplating time of more than 300 seconds, the steel sheet is immersed in an acid for a long time; thus, the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel is more than 0.20 ppm by mass, thereby deteriorating the bendability. Accordingly, the electroplating time is 300 seconds or less. The electroplating time is preferably 280 seconds or less, more preferably 250 seconds or less.


The steel sheet after the coating treatment step (electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet) may be subjected to the tempering step. The amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel can be reduced through the tempering step to further enhance the bendability. The tempering step is preferably a step of holding the steel sheet after the coating treatment step in a temperature range of 250° C. or lower for a holding time t that satisfies formula (1) below:

(T+273)(log t+4)≤2,700  (1)

where in formula (1), T is the holding temperature (° C.) in the tempering step, and t is the holding time (seconds) in the tempering step.


In the production method according to the embodiment described above, the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet having excellent bendability can be produced by controlling the production condition of the base steel sheet before the coating treatment step and the coating treatment conditions so as to form fine carbides in the surface layer portion of the steel and use the fine carbides as hydrogen-trapping sites to reduce the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel.


The hot-rolled steel sheet after the hot-rolling step may be subjected to heat treatment for softening the microstructure. After the coating treatment step, temper rolling may be performed for shape adjustment.


EXAMPLES

The present invention will be specifically described below with reference to Examples.


1. Production of Steel Sheet for Evaluation


Molten steels having component compositions given in Table 1, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities, were produced with a vacuum melting furnace. Each steel was subjected to blooming into a steel slab having a thickness of 27 mm. The resulting steel slab was hot-rolled into a hot-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 4.0 mm (hot-rolling step). Regarding samples to be subjected to cold rolling, the hot-rolled steel sheets were processed by grinding into a thickness of 3.2 mm and then cold-rolled at rolling reductions given in Tables 2-1 to 2-4 into cold-rolled steel sheets having a thickness of 1.4 mm (cold-rolling step). In Table 2-1, samples in which numerical values of the rolling reduction in the cold rolling are not described were not subjected to cold rolling. The hot-rolled steel sheets and the cold-rolled steel sheets produced as described above were subjected to heat treatment (annealing step) and coating (coating treatment step) under conditions given in Tables 2-1 to 2-4 to produce electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets. Blanks in Table 1 presenting the component composition indicate that the components are intentionally not added, and the blanks also include the case where the components are not contained (0% by mass) and the case where the components are incidentally contained. Some samples were subjected to the tempering step. In Tables 2-1 to 2-4, tempering condition cells that are blank indicate that no tempering step was performed.


In the coating treatment step, in the case of pure Zn coating, an electroplating solution prepared by adding 440 g/L of zinc sulfate heptahydrate to deionized water and adjusting the pH to 2.0 with sulfuric acid was used. For Zn—Ni coating, an electroplating solution prepared by adding 150 g/L of zinc sulfate heptahydrate and 350 g/L of nickel sulfate hexahydrate to deionized water and adjusting the pH to 1.3 with sulfuric acid was used. In the case of Zn—Fe coating, an electroplating solution prepared by adding 50 g/L of zinc sulfate heptahydrate and 350 g/L of iron sulfate to deionized water and adjusting the pH to 2.0 with sulfuric acid was used. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis of the coatings revealed that the alloy compositions of the coatings were 100% Zn, Zn-13% Ni, and Zn-46% Fe. The coating weight of each electrolytic zinc-based coating was 25 to 50 g/m2 per one surface. Specifically, the coating composed of 100%-Zn had a coating weight of 33 g/m2 per one surface. The coating composed of Zn-13% Ni had a coating weight of 27 g/m2 per one surface. The coating composed of Zn-46% Fe had a coating weight of 27 g/m2 per one surface. These electrolytic zinc-based coatings were formed on both surfaces of the steel sheets.










TABLE 1







Steel
Component composition (% by mass)




















grade
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
Sb
B
Nb
Ti
Cu
Ni





A
0.24
1.0
3.0
0.007
0.0008
0.051
0.0021
0.01







B
0.17
1.1
2.9
0.008
0.0003
0.068
0.0048
0.01







C
0.13
1.0
3.0
0.008
0.0005
0.080
0.0021
0.02







D
0.27
1.2
2.9
0.018
0.0002
0.021
0.0043
0.01







E
0.35
1.2
3.0
0.010
0.0010
0.077
0.0043
0.01







F
0.24
  0.002
3.5
0.010
0.0010
0.049
0.0058
0.04







G
0.22
1.7
3.4
0.007
0.0004
0.036
0.0014
0.01







H
0.22
0.9
1.8
0.007
0.0010
0.078
0.0034
0.02







I
0.21
0.8
2.5
0.006
0.0007
0.096
0.0046
0.03







J
0.23
0.9
4.9
0.025
0.0002
0.092
0.0028
0.01







K
0.19
1.0
3.5
0.009
0.0009
0.026
0.0031
 0.005







L
0.22
0.9
3.7
0.016
0.0004
0.039
0.0028
 0.003







M
0.23
0.8
3.4
0.005
0.0004
0.050
0.0015
0.07







N
0.22
0.8
3.5
0.006
0.0010
0.066
0.0053
0.09







O
0.23
1.1
3.6
0.038
0.0006
0.051
0.0040
0.01







P
0.19
0.1
2.9
0.006
0.0002
0.062
0.0027
0.01
0.0020






Q
0.24
0.8
3.1
0.009
0.0002
0.063
0.0051
0.05

0.0200





R
0.20
0.1
3.1
0.007
0.0004
0.038
0.0051
0.01


0.017




S
0.25
0.1
2.8
0.006
0.0003
0.040
0.0037
0.01
0.0015
0.0150
0.015




T
0.18
0.8
3.4
0.017
0.0005
0.034
0.0019
0.06



0.12



U
0.21
0.2
3.5
0.009
0.0003
0.096
0.0060
0.01



0.15
0.04


V
0.20
0.6
3.4
0.025
0.0010
0.096
0.0020
0.02







W
0.24
0.1
4.1
0.008
0.0010
0.068
0.0020
0.02







X
0.22
0.4
4.0
0.009
0.0001
0.057
0.0043
0.01







Y
0.23
1.1
3.5
0.009
0.0009
0.042
0.0029
0.03







Z
0.20
1.0
3.4
0.009
0.0007
0.034
0.0039
0.03







AA
0.18
0.8
3.4
0.045
0.0010
0.034
0.0033
0.04
0.0015
0.0150
0.01




AB
0.22
0.4
3.2
0.007
0.0007
0.060
0.0027
0.01







AC

0.42

1.1
3.2
0.019
0.0002
0.035
0.0021
0.01







AD

0.08

1.0
3.0
0.006
0.0002
0.077
0.0055
0.01







AE
0.21

2.4

3.1
0.008
0.0010
0.023
0.0028
0.01







AF
0.22
1.1

1.5

0.026
0.0006
0.069
0.0024
0.01







AG
0.21
0.8
3.1

0.070

0.0007
0.059
0.0010
0.01







AH
0.19
0.8
3.2
0.018

0.0080

0.069
0.0058
0.01







AI
0.22
1.1
2.8
0.007
0.0004

0.250

0.0028
0.01







AJ
0.25
0.8
3.3
0.006
0.0003
0.064

0.0150

0.01







AK
0.21
0.6
3.3
0.018
0.0008
0.071
0.0017
0.001







AL
0.18
 0.01
3.1
0.009
0.0005
0.076
0.0015

0.15

















Steel
Component composition (% by mass)
AC3






















grade
Cr
Mo
V
Zr
W
Ca
Ce
La
Mg
Sn
point







A










789




B










820




C










829




D










781




E










789




F










728




G










806




H










837




I










822




J










748




K










773




L










763




M










770




N










776




O










778




P










767




Q










780




R










755




S










753




T










771




U










762




V
0.15









790




W

0.2 








731




X
0.17
0.15
0.02







746




Y



0.012
0.01
0.0008
0.0009
0.0006
0.0004

776




Z









0.004
778




AA









0.01 
778




AB










764




AC










748




AD










843




AE










843




AF










851




AG










787




AH










795




AI










895




AJ










775




AK










778




AL










767





Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.



















TABLE 2-1









Hot rolling






















Finish
Average
Average

Cold





Slab
hot-
cooling
cooling

rolling
Annealing



















heating
rolling
rate
rate
Coiling
Rolling
Annealing

Average




temper-
temper-
to
to
temper-
re-
temper-
Dew
cooling



Steel
ature
ature
700° C. *1
650° C. *2
ature
duction
ature
point
rate


No.
grade
° C.
° C.
° C./s
° C./s
° C.
%
° C.
° C.
° C./S *3





 1
A
1250
880
232
31
550
56
820
−15
28


 2

1250
880
245
33
550
56
825
−15
26


 3

1250
880
225
32
550
56
830
−15
27


 4

1250
880
246
34
550
56
830
−15
30


 5

1250
880
248
50
550
56
840
−15
25


 6

1250
880
247
18
550
56
840
−15
34


 7

1250
880
239
13
550
56
860
−15
25


 8

1250
880
251
1
550
56
830
−15
27


 9
B
1250
880
235
33
550
56
887
−15
30


10

1240
880
237
35
550
56
902
−15
24


11

1210
880
241
37
550
56
896
−15
25


12


1180

880
242
34
550
56
890
−15
29


13
C
1250
900
239
38
550
56
863
−15
35


14

1250
880
242
35
550
56
904
−15
28


15

1250
850
250
36
550
56
894
 −5
27


16

1250

820

247
34
550
56
862
−15
26


17
D
1250
880
250
32
550
56
822
−15
30


18

1250
880
100
31
550
56
830
−15
25


19

1250
880
 40
38
550
56
834
 −6
28


20

1250
880
20
34
550
56
848
−15
30


21
E
1250
880
228
30
550
56
817
−15
26


22

1250
880
229
35
580
56
833
−15
37


23

1250
880
231
37
620
56
849
−15
30


24

1250
880
234
34

650

56
840
−15
26


25
F
1250
880
227
35
550

804
−15
25


26

1250
880
229
33
550

812
−15
28


27

1250
880
230
32
550

830
−15
30


28

1250
880
231
36
550

785
−15
34


29
G
1250
880
230
35
550
56
846
−15
28


30

1250
880
234
38
550
56
835
−15
27


31

1250
880
238
37
550
56
830
−15
30


32

1250
880
237
34
550
56

800

−15
26



























Tempering


















Annealing


condition





















Cooling




Hol-





















stop
Holding
Hol-
Coating
ding
Hol-





















temper-
temper-
ding
Type
Plating
temper-
ding





Steel
ature
ature
time
of
time
ature
time




No.
grade
° C.
° C.
s
coating
s
° C.
s






 1
A
150
150
150
Zn
120


Example



 2

150
150
150
Zn
180
250
 10
Example



 3

150
150
150
Zn
260
 80
3600
Example



 4

150
170
150
Zn

320



Com-












parative












example



 5

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



 6

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



 7

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



 8

150
170
150
Zn
240


Com-












parative












example



 9
B
150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



10

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



11

150
170
150
Zn
250


Example



12

150
170
150
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



13
C
150
170
150
Zn
260


Example



14

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



15

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



16

150
170
150
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



17
D
150
170
150
Zn
240
200
  30
Example



18

150
170
150
Zn
230
150
 180
Example



19

150
170
150
Zn
250


Example



20

150
170
150
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



21
E
150
170
150
Zn
260


Example



22

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



23

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



24

150
170
150
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



25
F
150
170
150
Zn
260


Example



26

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



27

150
170
150
Zn
250


Example



28

150
170
150
Zn
240


Example



29

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



30

150
170
150
Zn
260


Example



31

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



32

150
170
150
Zn
250


Com-












parative












Example





*1 The average cooling rate from the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C.


*2 The average cooling rate from 700° C. (primary cooling stop temperature) to 650° C.


*3 The average cooling rate in the temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.



















TABLE 2-2









Hot rolling






















Finish
Average
Average

Cold





Slab
hot-
cooling
cooling

rolling
Annealing



















heating
rolling
rate
rate
Coiling
Rolling
Annealing

Average




temper-
temper-
to
to
temper-
re-
temper-
Dew
cooling



Steel
ature
ature
650° C. *1
700° C. *2
ature
duction
ature
point
rate


No.
grade
° C.
° C.
° C./s
° C./s
° C.
%
° C.
° C.
° C./S *3





33
H
1250
880
241
31
550
56
865
−15
30


34

1250
880
235
32
550
56
870
−15
18


35

1250
880
236
33
550
56
880
−19
 6


36

1250
880
238
35
550
56
870
−15
2


37
I
1250
880
244
36
550
56
850
−15
28


38

1250
880
241
38
550
56
860
−15
27


39

1250
880
237
39
550
56
854
−15
26


40

1250
880
229
34
550
56
880
−15
30


41
J
1250
880
235
35
550
56
790
−15
25


42

1250
880
234
31
550
56
780
−15
35


43

1250
880
228
30
550
56
820
−15
29


44

1250
880
229
32
550
56
819
−15
30


45
K
1250
880
230
35
550
56
809
−15
27


46

1250
880
247
37
550
56
816
−15
28


47

1250
880
246
36
550
56
804
 −5
27


48

1250
880
241
34
550
56
820
−15
30


49
L
1250
880
300
33
550
56
793
−15
26


50

1250
880
220
32
550
56
801
−15
35


51

1250
880
150
35
550
56
821
 −7
29


52

1250
880
15
38
550
56
810
−15
27


53
M
1250
880
247
30
550
56
801
−15
28


54

1250
880
242
21
550
56
795
−15
29


55

1250
880
245
14
550
56
823
−15
30


56

1250
880
239
1
550
56
818
−15
38


57
N
1250
880
234
34
550
56
806
−15
27


58

1250
880
235
35
550
56
815
−15
29


59

1250
880
237
36
550
56
831
−15
28


60

1250
880
236
32
550
56
824
−15
28



























Tempering


















Annealing


condition





















Cooling




Hol-





















stop
Holding
Hol-
Coating
ding
Hol-





















temper-
temper-
ding
Type
Plating
temper-
ding





Steel
ature
ature
time
of
time
ature
time




No.
grade
° C.
° C.
s
coating
s
° C.
s






33
H
150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



34

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



35

150
170
150
Zn
260


Example



36

150
170
150
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



37
I

370

170
150
Zn
240


Com-












parative












example



38

340
170
150
Zn
230


Example



39

320
170
150
Zn
230


Example



40

120
170
150
Zn
250


Example



41
J
150
170

1750

Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



42

150
170
800
Zn
260


Example



43

150
170
100
Zn
230


Example



44

150
170
  8
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



45
K
150
90
150
Zn
200


Com-












parative












example



46

150
150
150
Zn
180


Example



47

150
170
150
Zn
160


Example



48

150

220

150
Zn
120


Com-












parative












example



49
L
150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



50

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



51

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



52

150
170
150
Zn
240


Com-












parative












example



53
M
150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



54

150
170
150
Zn
230


Example



55

150
170
150
Zn
250


Example



56

150
170
150
Zn
230


Com-












parative












example



57
N
150
170
150
Zn—Ni

400



Com-












parative












example



58

150
170
150
Zn—Ni

310



Com-












parative












example



59

150
170
150
Zn—Ni
240


Example



60

150
170
150
Zn—Ni
130


Example





*1 The average cooling rate from the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C.


*2 The average cooling rate from 700° C. (primary cooling stop temperature) to 650° C.


*3 The average cooling rate in the temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.



















TABLE 2-3









Hot rolling






















Finish
Average
Average

Cold





Slab
hot-
cooling
cooling

rolling
Annealing



















heating
rolling
rate
rate
Coiling
Rolling
Annealing

Average




temper-
temper-
to
to
temper-
re-
temper-
Dew
cooling



Steel
ature
ature
700° C. *1
650° C. *2
ature
duction
ature
point
rate


No.
grade
° C.
° C.
° C./s
° C./s
° C.
%
° C.
° C.
° C./S *3





61
O
1250
880
180
31
550
56
811
−15
29


62

1250
880
120
30
550
56
807
−27
30


63

1250
880
 60
37
550
56
830
−15
29


64

1250
880
35
35
550
56
806
−15
27


65
P
1250
880
237
38
550
56
793
−15
28


66

1250
880
235
34
550
56
807
−15
36


67

1250
880
233
35
550
56
820
−15
27


68

1250
880
238
31
550
56
814
 −7
30


69
Q
1250
880
241
32
550
56
802
−30
29


70

1250
880
240
35
550
56
811
−15
28


71

1250
880
241
33
550
56
834
−15
29


72

1250
880
240
34
550
56
822
−35
37


73
R
1250
880
246
36
550
56
789
−15
30


74

1250
880
238
31
550
56
781
−15
29


75

1250
880
237
32
550
56
805
 15
28


76

1250
880
237
34
550
56
810
 −6
26


77
S
1250
880
235
37
550
56
787
−15
28


78

1250
880
239
38
550
56
798
−15
27


79

1250
880
242
35
550
56
810
−15
30


80

1250
880
243
39
550
56
794
−15
29


81
T
1250
880
400
35
550
56
808
−15
33


82

1250
880
140
34
550
56
819
−15
27


83

1250
880
30
32
550
56
824
−15
28


85
U
1250
880
1148 
36
550
56
798
−15
30


86

1250
880
500
32
550
56
789
−15
28


87

1250
880
170
31
550
56
808
−26
29


88

1250
880
35
30
550
56
804
−15
27


89
V
1250
880
110
35
550
56
816
−15
28


90

1250
880
 70
37
550
56
827
−15
26


91

1250
880
30
38
550
56
830
−15
29


92

1250
880
1187 
36
550
56
824
−15
30



























Tempering


















Annealing


condition





















Cooling




Hol-





















stop
Holding
Hol-
Coating
ding
Hol-





















temper-
temper-
ding
Type
Plating
temper-
ding





Steel
ature
ature
time
of
time
ature
time




No.
grade
° C.
° C.
s
coating
s
° C.
s






61
O
150
170
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



62

150
170
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



63

150
170
150
Zn—Ni
260


Example



64

150
170
150
Zn—Ni
240


Com-












parative












example



65
P
150
150
 80
Zn—Ni
230


Example



66

150
150

1840

Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



67

150
150
  8
Zn—Ni
260


Com-












parative












example



68

150
150
600
Zn—Ni
230


Example



69
Q
150
150
300
Zn—Ni
250


Example



70

150
150

1630

Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



71

150
150
  7
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



72

150
150
 60
Zn—Ni
240


Example



73
R
150
150

1720

Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



74

150
150
  6
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



75

150
150
1200 
Zn—Ni
260


Example



76

150
150
900
Zn—Ni
250


Example



77
S
150
150

1750

Zn—Fe
230


Com-












parative












example



78

150
150
500
Zn—Fe
230


Example



79

150

230

200
Zn—Fe
230


Com-












parative












example



80

150
80
400
Zn—Fe
240


Com-












parative












example



81
T
150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Example



82

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Example



83

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
260


Com-












parative












example



85
U
150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230
100
120
Example



86

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
250


Example



87

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Example



88

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Com-












parative












example



89
V
150
150
150
Zn Fe
260


Example



90

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Example



91

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
240


Com-












parative












example



92

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Example





*1 The average cooling rate from the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C.


*2 The average cooling rate from 700° C. (primary cooling stop temperature) to 650° C.


*3 The average cooling rate in the temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.







Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.















TABLE 2-4









Hot rolling






















Finish
Average
Average

Cold





Slab
hot-
cooling
cooling

rolling
Annealing



















heating
rolling
rate
rate
Coiling
Rolling
Annealing

Average




temper-
temper-
to
to
temper-
re-
temper-
Dew
cooling



Steel
ature
ature
700° C. *1
650° C. *2
ature
duction
ature
point
rate


No.
grade
° C.
° C.
° C./s
° C./s
° C.
%
° C.
° C.
° C./S *3





 93
W
1250
880
130
35
550
56
760
−15
28


 94

1250
880
 60
38
550
56
779
−15
32


 95

1250
880
15
35
550
56
790
−15
29


 96

1250
880
120
34
550
56
783
−15
28


 97
X
1250
880
238
1124  
550
56
776
−15
29


 98

1250
880
237
160 
550
56
798
−15
27


 99

1250
880
234
1
550
56
805
−15
28


100

1250
880
241
48
550
56
788
−15
28


101
Y
1250
880
246
71
550
56
808
−15
30


102

1250
880
242
1
550
56
804
−15
29


103

1250
880
236
34
550
56
806
−27
27


104

1250
880
235
41
550
56
813
 −5
26


105
Z
1250
880
233
75
550
56
804
−15
34


106

1250
880
232
90
550
56
814
−15
27


107

1250
880
228
840 
550
56
823
−15
30


108

1250
880
229
1
550
56
805
−15
28


109
AA
1250
880
227
34
550
56
808
 −5
29


110

1250
880
230
32
550
56
812
−15
31


111

1250
880
229
31
550
56
825
−15
27


112

1250
880
225
30
550
56
806
−15
27


113
AB
1250
880
234
35
550
56
790
−15
30


114

1250
880
236
38
550
56
793
−15
29


115

1250
880
228
37
550
56
809
−30
28


116

1250
880
229
35
550
56
795
−15
33


117

AC

1250
880
230
36
550
56
783
−15
29


118

AD

1250
880
240
35
550
56
874
−15
27


119

AE

1250
880
231
34
550
56
882
−15
30


120

AF

1250
880
242
36
550
56
884
−15
28


121

AG

1250
880
250
33
550
56
820
−15
29


122

AH

1250
880
237
32
550
56
830
−15
30


123

AI

1250
880
240
35
550
56
929
−15
28


124

AJ

1250
880
245
35
550
56
802
−15
27


125

AK

1250
880
237
36
550
56
816
−15
26


126

AL

1250
880
239
30
550
56
807
−15
30



























Tempering


















Annealing


condition





















Cooling




Hol-





















stop
Holding
Hol-
Coating
ding
Hol-





















temper-
temper-
ding
Type
Plating
temper-
ding





Steel
ature
ature
time
of
time
ature
time




No.
grade
° C.
° C.
s
coating
s
° C.
s






 93
W
150
150
150
Zn—Fe
250
150
 20
Example



 94

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230
150
150
Example



 95

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Com-












parative












example



 96

150
150
150
Zn—Fe
230


Example



 97
X
150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



 98

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
250


Example



 99

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



100

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



101
Y
150
150
150
Zn—Ni
240


Example



102

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



103

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
260


Example



104

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



105
Z
150
150
150
Zn—Ni
250


Example



106

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



107

150
150
1200
Zn—Ni
230


Example



108

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
260


Com-












parative












example



109
AA
150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



110

270
120
150
Zn—Ni
240


Example



111

320
120
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



112


370

200
150
Zn—Ni
250


Com-












parative












example



113
AB
150
200
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



114


360

200
150
Zn—Ni
260


Com-












parative












example



115

300
200
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



116

150
200
150
Zn—Ni
230


Example



117

AC

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
240


Com-












parative












example



118

AD

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



119

AE

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



120

AF

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



121

AG

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



122

AH

150
150
150
Zn Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



123

AI

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



124

AJ

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



125

AK

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example



126

AL

150
150
150
Zn—Ni
230


Com-












parative












example





*1 The average cooling rate from the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C.


*2 The average cooling rate from 700° C. (primary cooling stop temperature) to 650° C.


*3 The average cooling rate in the temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.







2. Evaluation Method


With respect to the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets produced under various production conditions, the microstructure fractions were examined by the analysis of the steel microstructures. The tensile characteristics, such as tensile strength, were evaluated by conducting a tensile test. The bendability was evaluated by a bending test. Evaluation methods were described below.


(Total Area Percentage of One or Two of Martensite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less and Bainite Containing Carbide Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less)


A test piece was taken from a portion of each of the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets in the rolling direction and a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction. An L-cross-section extending in the thickness direction and a direction parallel to the rolling direction was mirror-polished, etched with Nital to reveal microstructures, and observed with a scanning electron microscope. The area percentage of each of martensite and bainite was examined by a point counting method in which a 16×15 grid of points at 4.8 μm intervals was placed on a region, measuring 82 μm×57 μm in terms of actual length, of a SEM image with a magnification of ×1,500 and the points on each phase were counted. The area percentage of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the entire microstructure was defined as the average value of their area percentages from SEM images obtained by continuous observation of the entire cross-section in the thickness direction at a magnification of ×1,500. The area percentage of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in a region extending a surface of a base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet was defined as the average value of their area percentages from SEM images obtained by continuous observation of the region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet at a magnification of ×1,500. Martensite and bainite appear as white microstructures in which blocks and packets are revealed within prior austenite grain boundaries and fine carbides are precipitated therein. A difficulty may lie in revealing carbides therein, depending on the crystallographic orientation of a block grain and the degree of etching. In that case, it is necessary to sufficiently perform etching and check it. The average particle size of the carbides in the martensite and the bainite was calculated by a method described below.


(Average Particle Size of Carbide in Martensite and Bainite)


A test piece was taken from a portion of each of the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets in the rolling direction and a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction. An L-cross-section extending in the thickness direction and a direction parallel to the rolling direction was mirror-polished, etched with Nital to reveal microstructures, and observed with a scanning electron microscope. The number of carbides in prior austenite grains containing martensite and bainite was calculated from one SEM image obtained by continuous observation of the region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet at a magnification of ×5,000. The total area of carbides in one grain was calculated by binarization of the microstructure. The area of one carbide particle was calculated from the number and the total area of the carbides. The average particle size of the carbides in the region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet was calculated. A method for measuring the average particle size of the carbides in the entire microstructure is as follows: A point located at a depth of ¼ of the thickness of the base steel sheet was observed with a scanning electron microscope. Then the average particle size of the carbides in the entire microstructure was measured in the same way as the method for calculating the average particle size of the carbides in the region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet. Here, the microstructure located at a depth of ¼ of the thickness of the base steel sheet was regarded as the average microstructure of the entire microstructure.


(Total Perimeter of Carbide Particles Having Average Particle Size of 50 nm or Less)


The total perimeter of individual carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the base steel sheet was determined as follows: Regarding the individual carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the region, the perimeters of the individual carbide particles were calculated by multiplying the average particle size of the individual carbide particles by circular constant pi 7c. The average of the resulting perimeters was determined. The total perimeter was determined by multiplying the average by the number of the carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less. The average particle size of the individual carbide particles is defined as the average value of lengths of the long axes and the short axes of the images of the carbide particles when the microstructure was binarized as described above.


(Tensile Test)


JIS No. 5 test pieces having a gauge length of 50 mm, a gauge width of 25 mm, and a thickness of 1.4 mm were taken from the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets in the rolling direction and subjected to a tensile test at a cross head speed of 10 mm/min to measure tensile strength (TS) and elongation (El).


(Bending Test)


Bending test pieces having a width of 25 mm and a length of 100 mm were taken from the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets in such a manner that the rolling direction was a bending direction. The test pieces were subjected to a test (n=3) by a pressing bend method according to JIS Z 2248 at a pressing rate of 100 mm/s and various bending radii. A bending radius at which no crack was formed in three test pieces was defined as a limit bending radius. Evaluation was performed on the basis of the ratio of the limit bending radius to the thickness of the steel sheet. Here, the presence or absence of a crack was checked by observation of outer sides of bent portions using a magnifier with a magnification of ×30. In the case where no crack was formed throughout a width of 25 mm of each test piece or in the case where at most five microcracks having a length of 0.2 μm or less were formed throughout a width of 25 mm of each test piece, the test piece was regarded as being free from cracks. The evaluation criterion for bendability was as follows: limit bending radius/thickness (R/t) 4.0.


(Hydrogen Analysis Method)


A strip-shaped plate having a long-axis length of 30 mm and a short-axis length of 5 mm was taken from the middle portion of each of the electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheets in the width direction. The coating on the surfaces of the strip was completely removed with a handy router. Hydrogen analysis was performed with a thermal desorption spectroscopy system at a rate of temperature increase of 200° C./h. Note that the hydrogen analysis was performed immediately after the strip-shaped plate was taken and then the coating was removed. The cumulative amount of hydrogen released from a heating start temperature (25° C.) to 200° C. was measured and used as the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the steel.


3. Evaluation Result


Tables 3-1 to 3-4 present the evaluation results.
















TABLE 3-1









Steel microstructure






















TM + B *2
Total
Amount of
Mechanical properties




















TM +
in surface
perimeter of
diffusible hydrogen


TS ×





Steel
B *1
layer portion
fine carbide *3
in steel
TS
El
El




No.
grade
%
%
μm/mm2
ppm by mass
MPa
%
MPa · %
R/t





 1
A
97
87
67
0.03
1840
7.8
14352
3.1
Example


 2

96
88
61
0.07
1830
7.7
14091
3.6
Example


 3

97
88
64
0.06
1840
7.7
14168
3.3
Example


 4

95
90
63

0.29

1810
7.6
13756

4.2

Comparative












example


 5

97
87
67
0.17
1820
7.8
14196
3.5
Example


 6

97
92
66
0.16
1830
7.7
14091
3.2
Example


 7

98
80
55
0.13
1840
7.7
14168
3.4
Example


 8

96

77


48

0.18
1820
7.8
14196

4.1

Comparative












example


 9
B
93
88
60
0.19
1570
8.7
13659
3.5
Example


10

92
83
66
0.16
1560
8.7
13572
3.6
Example


11

93
84
55
0.20
1570
8.7
13659
3.3
Example


12

94
89

43

0.15
1580
8.7
13746

4.5

Comparative












example


13
C
93
87
61
0.16
1580
8.6
13588
3.6
Example


14

93
85
64
0.09
1580
8.6
13588
3.2
Example


15

92
87
51
0.10
1570
8.7
13659
3.8
Example


16

93

78


45

0.07
1580
8.7
13746

4.7

Comparative












example


17
D
97
91
64
0.02
1830
7.8
14274
3.6
Example


18

98
93
69
0.05
1840
7.7
14168
3.5
Example


19

98
81
52
0.08
1840
7.7
14168
3.8
Example


20

96

77


47

0.13
1820
7.8
14196

4.4

Comparative












example


21
E
99
91
56
0.11
2020
7.4
14948
3.4
Example


22

99
93
55
0.18
2010
7.4
14874
3.7
Example


23

98
81
64
0.17
2000
7.4
14800
3.7
Example


24

99

77

58
0.10
2030
7.3
14819

4.5

Comparative












example


25
F
97
89
52
0.18
1950
7.5
14625
3.4
Example


26

97
91
51
0.17
1950
7.5
14625
3.2
Example


27

98
89
53
0.18
1960
7.5
14700
3.3
Example


28

98
90
51
0.10
1960
7.4
14504
3.5
Example


29
G
96
86
68
0.18
1880
7.6
14288
3.2
Example


30

94
87
65
0.06
1860
7.7
14322
3.4
Example


31

91
84
67
0.10
1820
7.8
14196
3.6
Example


32


88


74

65

0.32

1740
7.9
13746

4.5

Comparative












example





*1 The total area percentage of martensite (TM) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite (B) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the entire microstructure.


*2 The total area percentage of TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in a region extending from a surface to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the sheet (surface layer portion).


*3 The total perimeter of carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the surface layer portion.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.




















TABLE 3-2









Steel microstructure






















TM + B *2
Total
Amount of
Mechanical properties




















TM +
in surface
perimeter of
diffusible hydrogen


TS ×





Steel
B *1
layer portion
fine carbide *3
in steel
TS
El
El




No.
grade
%
%
μm/mm2
ppm by mass
MPa
%
MPa · %
R/t





33
H
92
84
70
0.13
1400
9.4
13160
3.3
Example


34

91
84
68
0.13
1410
9.4
13254
3.4
Example


35

90
83
60
0.18
1360
9.6
13056
3.0
Example


36


84


79

61

0.24


1290

9.8
12642

4.2

Comparative












example


37
I
92

76


48

0.15
1590
8.6
13674

4.8

Comparative












example


38

92
81
51
0.05
1580
8.7
13746
3.2
Example


39

93
84
60
0.14
1600
8.6
13760
3.5
Example


40

92
85
53
0.11
1580
8.7
13746
3.7
Example


41
J
99

75


45

0.16
2150
7.1
15265

4.1

Comparative












example


42

97
96
69
0.16
2160
7.1
15336
3.2
Example


43

97
96
58
0.09
2160
7.1
15336
3.3
Example


44

98
96

45

0.05
2140
7.1
15194

4.3

Comparative












example


45
K
97
82

42

0.16
1850
7.7
14245

4.2

Comparative












example


46

98
82
54
0.20
1860
7.7
14322
3.8
Example


47

97
83
66
0.09
1850
7.7
14245
3.3
Example


48

96

78


42

0.14
1830
7.8
14274

4.4

Comparative












example


49
L
99
84
56
0.10
1960
7.5
14700
3.5
Example


50

99
82
64
0.11
1960
7.5
14700
3.6
Example


51

98
81
60
0.06
1980
7.4
14652
3.8
Example


52

98

68


41

0.19
1970
7.5
14775

4.1

Comparative












example


53
M
98
93
62
0.09
1900
7.6
14440
3.1
Example


54

97
89
57
0.16
1890
7.6
14364
3.7
Example


55

99
82
54
0.17
1910
7.6
14516
3.4
Example


56

98

78


46

0.15
1900
7.6
14440

4.4

Comparative












example


57
N
99
93
64

0.21

1910
7.4
14134

4.2

Comparative












example


58

98
91
65

0.22

1880
7.5
14100

4.3

Comparative












example


59

99
91
60
0.09
1890
7.6
14364
3.2
Example


60

99
92
68
0.06
1900
7.8
14820
3.0
Example





*1 The total area percentage of martensite (TM) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite (B) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the entire microstructure.


*2 The total area percentage of TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in a region extending from a surface to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the sheet (surface layer portion).


*3 The total perimeter of carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the surface layer portion.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.

















TABLE 3-3









Steel microstructure





















Amount
Mechanical properties





















TM + B *2
Total
of diffusible


TS ×






TM +
in surface
perimeter of
hydrogen


El





Steel
B*1
layer portion
fine carbide *3
in steel
TS
El
MPa ·




No.
grade
%
%
μm/mm2
ppm by mass
MPa
%
%
R/t





61
O
98
95
66
0.17
1960
7.5
14700
3.7
Example


62

99
91
61
0.11
1950
7.5
14625
3.0
Example


63

99
82
53
0.15
1940
7.5
14550
3.6
Example


64

99

78


45

0.09
1950
7.5
14625

4.2

Comparative example


65
P
92
82
60
0.03
1670
8.3
13861
3.7
Example


66

94

79


45

0.09
1690
8.4
14196

4.2

Comparative example


67

92
82

42

0.02
1670
8.3
13861

4.2

Comparative example


68

93
87
64
0.18
1680
8.2
13776
3.8
Example


69
Q
96
86
66
0.06
1830
7.8
14274
3.0
Example


70

95

78


43

0.07
1820
7.8
14196

4.3

Comparative example


71

97
91

49

0.06
1840
7.7
14168

4.3

Comparative example


72

97
88
67
0.06
1830
7.8
14274
3.0
Example


73
R
94

76


49

0.08
1750
8.0
14000

4.6

Comparative example


74

95
85

45

0.04
1760
8.0
14080

4.5

Comparative example


75

92
86
69
0.12
1710
8.2
14022
3.6
Example


76

93
84
60
0.04
1730
8.1
14013
3.9
Example


77
S
93

76


47

0.09
1760
8.0
14080

4.3

Comparative example


78

93
85
57
0.07
1750
8.0
14000
3.6
Example


79

94

79


48

0.18
1760
8.0
14080

4.1

Comparative example


80

92
86

46

0.06
1730
8.1
14013

4.2

Comparative example


81
T
94
89
62
0.05
1800
7.8
14040
3.3
Example


82

95
90
61
0.06
1810
7.8
14118
3.2
Example


83

93

79


48

0.01
1790
7.8
13962

4.1

Comparative example


85
U
96
91
63
0.16
1890
7.6
14364
3.3
Example


86

98
91
55
0.10
1920
7.6
14592
3.2
Example


87

96
89
67
0.15
1900
7.6
14440
3.0
Example


88

97

77


45

0.15
1900
7.6
14440

4.4

Comparative example


89
V
96
89
69
0.03
1840
7.7
14168
3.5
Example


90

95
81
53
0.16
1830
7.7
14091
3.2
Example


91

95

78


48

0.02
1830
7.7
14091

4.3

Comparative example


92

96
90
55
0.04
1840
7.7
14168
3.7
Example





*1 The total area percentage of martensite (TM) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite (B) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the entire microstructure.


*2 The total area percentage of TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in a region extending from a surface to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the sheet (surface layer portion).


*3 The total perimeter of carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the surface layer portion.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.




















TABLE 3-4









Steel microstructure
























Amount
Mechanical properties





















TM + B *2
Total
of diffusible


TS ×






TM +
in surface
perimeter of
hydrogen


El





Steel
B*1
layer portion
fine carbide *3
in steel
TS
El
MPa ·




No.
grade
%
%
μm/mm2
ppm by mass
MPa
%
%
R/t





 93
W
99
91
59
0.14
2130
7.1
15123
3.4
Example


 94

99
82
53
0.12
2110
7.2
15192
3.5
Example


 95

99

78


45

0.10
2090
7.2
15048

4.4

Comparative example


 96

99
96
65
0.03
2140
7.1
15194
3.5
Example


 97
X
99
95
70
0.08
2060
7.3
15038
3.4
Example


 98

99
90
70
0.02
2040
7.3
14892
3.4
Example


 99

99

78


45

0.18
2050
7.3
14965

4.2

Comparative example


100

99
91
61
0.03
2040
7.3
14892
3.6
Example


101
Y
99
92
66
0.16
1930
7.5
14475
3.5
Example


102

99

77


43

0.06
1940
7.5
14550

4.3

Comparative example


103

99
89
68
0.16
1930
7.5
14475
3.0
Example


104

98
93
68
0.10
1920
7.6
14592
3.8
Example


105
Z
97
91
59
0.02
1840
7.7
14168
3.4
Example


106

96
88
55
0.13
1820
7.8
14196
3.5
Example


107

97
91
65
0.07
1830
7.7
14091
3.6
Example


108

95

76


46

0.11
1800
7.8
14040

4.4

Comparative example


109
AA
94
86
67
0.20
1800
7.8
14040
3.9
Example


110

96
88
57
0.14
1820
7.8
14196
3.6
Example


111

96
89
56
0.08
1820
7.8
14196
3.6
Example


112

95

77


49

0.16
1810
7.8
14118

4.2

Comparative example


113
AB
97
89
61
0.15
1820
7.8
14196
3.6
Example


114

96
91

45

0.15
1810
7.8
14118

4.3

Comparative example


115

95
86
61
0.03
1800
7.8
14040
3.0
Example


116

95
85
64
0.10
1800
7.8
14040
3.3
Example


117

AC

98
96
65
0.12
2230

6.5

14495
3.4
Comparative example


118

AD


83


74

67

0.24

1480
9.0
13320

4.4

Comparative example


119

AE

94
89

41


0.22

1770
7.9
13983

4.2

Comparative example


120

AF

93

78


45

0.05

1310

9.8
12838

4.4

Comparative example


121

AG

94

79

60
0.20
1770
7.9
13983

4.7

Comparative example


122

AH

93

78

67
0.03
1760
8.0
14080

4.4

Comparative example


123

AI

93
87

44

0.10
1700
8.2
13940

4.4

Comparative example


124

AJ

96
89

47

0.18
1910
7.6
14516

4.4

Comparative example


125

AK

98
92

48

0.16
1830
7.9
14457

4.1

Comparative example


126

AL

94

79

66
0.03
1700
8.2
13940

4.7

Comparative example





*1 The total area percentage of martensite (TM) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite (B) containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the entire microstructure.


*2 The total area percentage of TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in a region extending from a surface to a depth of ⅛ of the thickness of the sheet (surface layer portion).


*3 The total perimeter of carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in TM containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and B containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the surface layer portion.


Underlined values are outside the scope of the present invention.






In the examples, a steel sheet satisfying TS 1,320 MPa, El≥7.0%, TS×El≥12,000, and R/t≤4.0 was rated acceptable and presented as “Example” in Tables 3-1 to 3-4. A steel sheet that does not satisfy at least one of TS 1,320 MPa, El≥7.0%, TS×El≥12,000, and R/t≤4.0 was rated unacceptable and presented as “Comparative example” in Tables 3-1 to 3-4. Underlines in Tables 1 to 3-4 indicate that the requirements, production conditions, and properties according to aspects of the present invention are not satisfied.

Claims
  • 1. A high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet having a tensile strength TS of 1.320 MPa or more, an elongation El of 7.0% or more, and TS/El=12.000 MPa-% or more comprising an electrolytic zinc-based coating on a surface of a base steel sheet, wherein the base steel sheet has a component composition containing, on a percent by mass basis,C: 0.12% or more and 0.40% or less,Si: 0.001% or more and 2.0% or less,Mn: 1.7% or more and 5.0% or less,P: 0.050% or less,S: 0.0050% or less,Al: 0.010% or more and 0.20% or less,N: 0.010% or less, andSb: 0.002% or more and 0.10% or less, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities; anda steel microstructure in which a total area percentage of one or two of martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 90% or more in the entire steel microstructure, a total area percentage of one or two of the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less is 80% or more in a region extending from the surface of the base steel sheet to a depth of ⅛ of a thickness of the base steel sheet, and a total perimeter of individual carbide particles having an average particle size of 50 nm or less in the martensite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less and the bainite containing a carbide having an average particle size of 50 nm or less present in the region is 50 μm/mm2 or more, the martensite being defined as a total of as-quenched martensite and tempered martensite,wherein an amount of diffusible hydrogen in steel is 0.20 ppm or less by mass, andwherein high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coarted steel sheet has a limit bending radius/thickness P/t of 4.0 or less in a predetermined bending test.
  • 2. The high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the component composition further contains, on a percent by mass basis, at least one selected from the group consisting of: group A: B: 0.0002% or more and less than 0.0035%;group B: one or two selected from Nb: 0.002% or more and 0.08% or less, and Ti: 0.002% or more and 0.12% or less;group C: one or two selected from Cu: 0.005% or more and 1% or less, and Ni: 0.01% or more and 1% or less;group D: one or two or more selected from Cr: 0.01% or more and 1.0% or less, Mo: 0.01% or more and less than 0.3%, V: 0.003% or more and 0.5% or less, Zr: 0.005% or more and 0.2% or less, and W: 0.005% or more and 0.2% or less;group E: one or two or more selected from Ca: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, Ce: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, La: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, and Mg: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less; andgroup F: Sn: 0.002% or more and 0.1% or less.
  • 3. A method for producing the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to claim 1, comprising: a hot-rolling step of hot-rolling a steel slab having a component composition at a slab heating temperature of 1,200° C. or higher and a finish hot-rolling temperature of 840° C. or higher, performing cooling to a primary cooling stop temperature of 700° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 40° C./s or more in a temperature range of the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C., performing cooling at an average cooling rate of 2° C./s or more in a temperature range of the primary cooling stop temperature to 650° C., performing cooling to a coiling temperature of 630° C. or lower, and performing coiling, the steel slab component composition containing, on a percent by mass basis, C: 0.12% or more and 0.40% or less, Si: 0.001% or more and 2.0% or less, Mn: 1.7% or more and 5.0% or less, P: 0.050% or less, S: 0.0050% or less, Al: 0.010% or more and 0.20% or less, N: 0.010% or less, and Sb: 0.002% or more and 0.10% or less, the balance being Fe and incidental impurities;an annealing step of heating a steel sheet after the hot-rolling step to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point or performing heating to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point and performing soaking, performing cooling to a cooling stop temperature of 350° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 3° C./s or more in a temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C., and performing holding at a holding temperature in a temperature range of 100° C. to 200° C. for 20 to 1,500 seconds; anda coating treatment step of cooling the steel sheet after the annealing step to room temperature and subjecting the steel sheet to electrolytic zinc-based coating for an electroplating time of 300 seconds or less.
  • 4. A method for producing the high-ductility, high-strength electrolytic zinc-based coated steel sheet according to claim 2, comprising: a hot-rolling step of hot-rolling a steel slab having a component composition at a slab heating temperature of 1,200° C. or higher and a finish hot-rolling temperature of 840° C. or higher, performing cooling to a primary cooling stop temperature of 700° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 40° C./s or more in a temperature range of the finish hot-rolling temperature to 700° C., performing cooling at an average cooling rate of 2° C./s or more in a temperature range of the primary cooling stop temperature to 650° C., performing cooling to a coiling temperature of 630° C. or lower, and performing coiling, the steel slab component composition containing, on a percent by mass basis, C: 0.12% or more and 0.40% or less, Si: 0.001% or more and 2.0% or less, Mn: 1.7% or more and 5.0% or less, P: 0.050% or less, S: 0.0050% or less, Al: 0.010% or more and 0.20% or less, N: 0.010% or less, and Sb: 0.002% or more and 0.10% or less, at least one selected from the group consisting of: group A: B: 0.0002% or more and less than 0.0035%; group B: one or two selected from Nb: 0.002% or more and 0.08% or less, and Ti: 0.002% or more and 0.12% or less; group C: one or two selected from Cu: 0.005% or more and 1% or less, and Ni: 0.01% or more and 1% or less; group D: one or two or more selected from Cr: 0.01% or more and 1.0% or less, Mo: 0.01% or more and less than 0.3%, V: 0.003% or more and 0.5% or less, Zr: 0.005% or more and 0.2% or less, and W: 0.005% or more and 0.2% or less; and group E: one or two or more selected from Ca: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, Ce: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, La: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less, and Mg: 0.0002% or more and 0.0030% or less; and the balance being Fe and incidental impurities; an annealing step of heating a steel sheet after the hot-rolling step to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point or performing heating to an annealing temperature equal to or higher than an AC3 point and performing soaking, performing cooling to a cooling stop temperature of 350° C. or lower at an average cooling rate of 3° C./s or more in a temperature range of the annealing temperature to 550° C., and performing holding at a holding temperature in a temperature range of 100° C. to 200° C. for 20 to 1,500 seconds; anda coating treatment step of cooling the steel sheet after the annealing step to room temperature and subjecting the steel sheet to electrolytic zinc-based coating for an electroplating time of 300 seconds or less.
  • 5. The method according to claim 3, further comprising, after the hot-rolling step, a cold-rolling step of cold-rolling the steel sheet between the hot-rolling step and the annealing step.
  • 6. The method according to claim 4, further comprising, after the hot-rolling step, a cold-rolling step of cold-rolling the steel sheet between the hot-rolling step and the annealing step.
  • 7. The method according to claim 3, further comprising a tempering step of holding the steel sheet after the coating treatment step in a temperature range of −250° C. or lower for a holding time t that satisfies formula (1) below: (T+273)(log t+4)≤2,700  (1)where in formula (1), T is a holding temperature in ° C. in the tempering step, and t is the holding time in seconds in the tempering step.
  • 8. The method according to claim 4, further comprising a tempering step of holding the steel sheet after the coating treatment step in a temperature range of −250° C. or lower for a holding time t that satisfies formula (1) below: (T+273)(log t+4)≤2,700  (1)where in formula (1), T is a holding temperature in ° C. in the tempering step, and t is the holding time in seconds in the tempering step.
  • 9. The method according to claim 5, further comprising a tempering step of holding the steel sheet after the coating treatment step in a temperature range of −250° C. or lower for a holding time t that satisfies formula (1) below: (T+273)(log t+4)≤2,700  (1)where in formula (1), T is a holding temperature in ° C. in the tempering step, and t is the holding time in seconds in the tempering step.
  • 10. The method according to claim 6, further comprising a tempering step of holding the steel sheet after the coating treatment step in a temperature range of −250° C. or lower for a holding time t that satisfies formula (1) below: (T+273)(log t+4)≤2,700  (1)where in formula (1), T is a holding temperature in ° C. in the tempering step, and t is the holding time in seconds in the tempering step.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2018-196591 Oct 2018 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2019/030793 8/6/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/079926 4/23/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
8449988 Shiraki et al. May 2013 B2
9121087 Matsuda et al. Sep 2015 B2
20120132327 Mukai May 2012 A1
20120222781 Azuma Sep 2012 A1
20130199679 Toji Aug 2013 A1
20130295402 Oh et al. Nov 2013 A1
20170218475 Kawasaki et al. Aug 2017 A1
20180100212 Ono Apr 2018 A1
20180363088 Tsuzumi et al. Dec 2018 A1
20200032364 Hirashima Jan 2020 A1
20200172991 Takashima et al. Jun 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
103842543 Jun 2014 CN
2762583 Aug 2014 EP
3486346 May 2019 EP
3489382 May 2019 EP
3550050 Oct 2019 EP
200080418 Mar 2000 JP
2010090475 Apr 2010 JP
2011231377 Nov 2011 JP
2011246746 Dec 2011 JP
2014508854 Apr 2014 JP
6414371 Oct 2018 JP
2016021195 Feb 2016 WO
WO-2016152163 Sep 2016 WO
2017026125 Feb 2017 WO
2018062380 Apr 2018 WO
2018062381 Apr 2018 WO
2018146828 Aug 2018 WO
2019003538 Jan 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201980068231.7, dated May 30, 2022 with Concise Statement of Relevance of Office Action, 6 pages.
Korean Office Action for Korean Application No. 10-2021-7011163, dated Oct. 1, 2022, with Concise Statement of Relevance of Office Action, 7 pages.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201980068231.7, dated Nov. 30, 2021 with Search Report, 9 pages.
Korean Written Decision on Registration for Korean Application No. 10-2021-7011163, dated Mar. 23, 2023 with translation, 4 pages.
Kodym, M. et al., Autorenkollektiv: “Spurenelemente im Stahl—Meoglichkeiten zur Beeinflussung im Smelzbetrieb, Trace Elements in Steel—Possibilities for Influencing the Smelting Operation,” Jan. 1, 1985, 5 pages, XP002433212 (partial English translation).
Bell, S., et al., “Final Report on Effect of Impurities in Steel,” Report No. 2005-41(CF), Mar. 1, 2006, 24 pages, XP009508207, Final Report of Natural Resources Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Retrieved from the Internet: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306293969?channel=doi&linkId=57b7493708aec9984ff2a51f&showFulltext=true.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19 873 988.0, dated May 4, 2021, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/JP2019/030793, dated Nov. 5, 2019, 7 pages.
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) for European Application No. 19 873 988.0, dated Aug. 8, 2023, 6 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210324504 A1 Oct 2021 US