High dynamic range CMOS image sensor having anti-blooming properties and associated methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9762830
  • Patent Number
    9,762,830
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 18, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 12, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A method of providing blooming protection to a CMOS imager having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, where the CMOS imager is operable to capture high dynamic range images using a rolling shutter, is provided. Such a method can include reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in a readout row of a first integration time, applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row, and starting a second integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the second integration time is shorter than the first integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to preclude blooming effects from the pixel array during the second integration time.
Description
BACKGROUND

In general, CMOS image sensors tend to have a limited dynamic range due to well capacity limitations. Various approaches have been attempted to improve dynamic range using such sensors, such as, for example, multiple exposure, lateral overflow, logarithmic pixel, in-pixel delta-sigma ADC, pixel with multiple-size-photodiodes, pixel arrays with different neutral density filters, dual conversion gain, etc. The multiple exposure approach is one common technique for high dynamic range (HDR) imaging.


In lateral overflow HDR schemes, pixel integration time is divided into two or more segments. In each segment, the effective pixel well capacity is varied. At the end of integration, the total accumulated charge is readout. However, this approach normally has fixed pattern noise at each knee point (the time at which an intermediary reset voltage is applied) on the signal response curve. Lateral overflow approaches also tend to be flexible regarding dynamic range extension.


Delta-sigma ADC (Analog to Digital Converter) is a method for encoding analog signals into digital signals or for encoding high-resolution signals to lower-resolution signals. In the in-pixel delta-sigma ADC scheme, each pixel's integration time is individually controlled. This approach in theory can provide the best HDR scene capture and is the most flexible to achieve the highest possible dynamic range. However, the pixel size is large, complex and not appealing for most consumer applications.


In multiple-diode-pixel systems, each pixel has multiple photodiodes. The effective sensitivity of two photodiodes can thus be made different by design. Therefore, the HDR scene multiple-exposure can be achieved simultaneously. However, the enhanced dynamic rage is fixed in design and it is not flexible.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantage of the present invention, reference is being made to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments and in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a four transistor CMOS image sensor pixel in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a depiction of a method of providing blooming protection in accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a depiction of a method of providing blooming protection in accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of a 2-pointer HDR image sensor readout and shutter timing scheme, in accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of a 2-pointer HDR image sensor readout and shutter timing scheme, in accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of a timing diagram for a rolling shutter readout scheme, in accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before the present disclosure is described herein, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.


DEFINITIONS

The following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.


It should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” and, “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a pixel” includes one or more of such pixels and reference to “the shutter” includes reference to one or more of such shutters.


In this application, “comprises,” “comprising,” “containing” and “having” and the like can have the meaning ascribed to them in U.S. Patent law and can mean “includes,” “including,” and the like, and are generally interpreted to be open ended terms. The terms “consisting of” or “consists of” are closed terms, and include only the components, structures, steps, or the like specifically listed in conjunction with such terms, as well as that which is in accordance with U.S. Patent law. “Consisting essentially of” or “consists essentially of” have the meaning generally ascribed to them by U.S. Patent law. In particular, such terms are generally closed terms, with the exception of allowing inclusion of additional items, materials, components, steps, or elements, that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics or function of the item(s) used in connection therewith. For example, trace elements present in a composition, but not affecting the composition's nature or characteristics would be permissible if present under the “consisting essentially of” language, even though not expressly recited in a list of items following such terminology. When using an open ended term, like “comprising” or “including,” it is understood that direct support should be afforded also to “consisting essentially of” language as well as “consisting of” language as if stated explicitly, and vice versa. Further, it is to be understood that the listing of components, species, or the like in a group is done for the sake of convenience and that such groups should be interpreted not only in their entirety, but also as though each individual member of the group has been articulated separately and individually without the other members of the group unless the context dictates otherwise. This is true of groups contained both in the specification and claims of this application. Additionally, no individual member of a group should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same group solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.


As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, a composition that is “substantially free of” particles would either completely lack particles, or so nearly completely lack particles that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked particles. In other words, a composition that is “substantially free of” an ingredient or element may still actually contain such item as long as there is no measurable effect thereof.


As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range endpoint by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.


Concentrations, amounts, and other numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 1 to about 5” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 1 to about 5, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. Thus, included in this numerical range are individual values such as 2, 3, and 4 and sub-ranges such as from 1-3, from 2-4, and from 3-5, etc., as well as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, individually.


This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value as a minimum or a maximum. Furthermore, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.


THE DISCLOSURE

The presently disclosed technology provides systems, methods, and devices for use in capturing high dynamic range (HDR) images using CMOS imagers. More specifically, blooming protection is provided through the strategic use of shuttering, particularly between images captured at different integration times. These novel techniques can reduce blooming issues that apply to any row-wise HDR CMOS imager such as, for example, rolling shutter CMOS imagers.


CMOS image sensors generally include an array of pixels arranged in rows and columns. Each pixel can generally include a photodiode and a transfer gate, which is used in image readout to control the transfer of collected charge from the photodiode. Imagers can further include a reset gate used to reset or shutter a plurality of pixels (i.e. one or more rows of pixels in some aspects), a row select transistor, among others. It is noted that CMOS imagers are well known in the art, and as such any known component or design incorporated into an imager using a row-wise readout scheme should be considered to be within the present scope. As examples, CMOS imagers having four transistor (4T), 5T, or more can be utilized. One non-limiting example of a 4T CMOS imager is shown in FIG. 1. Such a device can include a photodiode 102, a transfer transistor 104, a floating diffusion region 106, a reset 108, source follower 110, a row select 112, a power supply voltage for the pixel array 114, and the voltage out 116.


Row-wise readout, also known as rolling shutter, is often used as a mechanism in CMOS imaging to control exposure time of the pixels to incident light. The rolling shutter is an electronic shutter that operates at the level of the pixel, and rolls along the pixel array row-by-row. When a row is selected to be shuttered, a reset voltage is applied to the pixel via a reset transistor and a voltage is applied to the transfer gate, thus clearing the contents of the photodiode of the pixel and placing the pixel in a reset state. While in the reset state, the pixel does not accumulate charge from incoming photons. Once the reset voltage and the transfer gate voltage has been removed, the pixel is capable of absorbing incoming photons and accumulating the resulting charge. In one non-limiting example of a typical rolling shutter process, rows of pixels in the imager can be reset in sequence, starting, for example, at the top of the array and proceeding row-by-row to the bottom of the array. It is noted, however, that rolling shutter processes can move from any point in the array to another, and that such is merely exemplary. Once the reset operation has moved past a row of pixels, charge integration begins. Following a given integration time, set by the device or the user, the readout operation begins. Rows can be read out of the pixel array in the order of the rolling shutter to maintain a constant integration time for each row. Thus, the exposure time for the pixel array is controlled by the timing difference between the passing of the rolling shutter and readout of the rows of the array. This exposure time is often referred to as the integration time. Increasing the integration time increases the duration that the pixels are accumulating charge, while decreasing the integration time decreases charge accumulation.


One common problem that can arise when capturing an image, particularly with a long integration time, is referred to as “blooming.” A pixel has a limited charge-well capacity, and thus can only accumulate a fixed amount of charge. When this well is full, and particularly then the pixel continues to convert photons to charge, excess charge can spill over into neighboring pixels, thus corrupting the associated charge concentration in those pixels. This negative effect can also spill over into pixels multiple rows away, depending on the relative charge between the source of the blooming and the affected rows, the pixel size, the epitaxial layer thickness, etc. This can be particularly problematic for imaging scenes with bright light on a dark background, such as, for example, car headlights in the dark. Such blooming thus spreads, causing unwanted noise throughout at least portions of the image.


As has been described, multiple exposure imaging is one technique for generating high dynamic range (HDR) images with CMOS technology. HDR images captures a greater dynamic range between the lightest and darkest regions of a given scene as compared to normal imaging technologies. Common HDR scenes occur when there is a large contrast of light intensity between objects in the scene, such as illumination of a car's headlights at night. In multiple exposure HDR schemes, multiple images are taken at different integration times for each frame for the same scene. Afterwards, the multiple images are combined to reconstruct the final image. Typically, the multiple exposure HDR schemes can be frame-wise or row-wise. In a frame-wise HDR scheme, two (or more) frames are readout sequentially, meaning the whole focal plane array is read out at least twice and combined to create the HDR image. The first frame will have a predetermined integration time, also known as exposure time, and the second frame will have a predetermined integration time. Typically, the frame for capturing the low lighting intensities in a scene will have a longer exposure or integration time than the frame capturing regular lighting intensities or high intensities of a given scene. Once the raw image data from the two frames has been read out, they are combined to create a HDR image. In row-wise HDR imaging, on the other hand, every row is read out multiple times in a single frame image, in which each readout has an integration time, which can, in some cases, be different integration times. For a three exposure HDR readout scheme, for example, each row is read out three times at different integration times. To reconstruct the final HDR image, the raw image data from a row-wise HDR is separated into individual frame data first. Both frame-wise and row-wise HDR approaches are flexible regarding extended dynamic range and can be applied to most CMOS imager with minimal design changes. However, both designs can utilize on-chip or off-chip memory to store the image data before final image re-construction.


One implementation of a row-wise HDR imaging scheme initiates a first image process having a longer integration time exposure using a rolling shutter, with a second image process having a shorter integration time being initiated following the readout of the first image. In situations where blooming occurs in the longer integration time image, such blooming charge can cross the reset pixels into the second image having the shorter integration time, thus causing undesirable noise. As one example, assume a rolling shutter one row wide rolls across a pixel array, initiating integration. At the end of a 100 row integration time, each row is read out and reset with a second rolling shutter, again 1 row wide, that initiates integration of the pixels for a shorter 3 row integration time. In this case, rows that have yet to be read out for the long integration time may have wells with sufficient charge to bloom, and as such can cross the second rolling shutter prior to readout of the row, causing corruption of the charge in the pixels undergoing short integration.


The present technology reduces or eliminates such undesirable blooming through the strategic use of shuttering to limit the blooming across the rows that are being reset or shuttered following readout of the long integration time image. Such strategic shuttering can be accomplished in a variety of ways, such as, for example, variation in the number of rows shuttered, the pattern of the rows shuttered, temporal variations in the shuttering voltage, and the like. In one aspect, the number of shuttered rows can be increased that are directly adjacent to one another. In this case, readout of the long integration time is followed up by a shutter that is 2, 3, 4, or more rows wide. Following this extended shutter, the reset is removed and the pixels are allowed to integrate for the short integration time. Charge from pixels having full charge wells that have not yet been read out in the long integration time region is thus precluded or limited from crossing the multiple row shutter, or in other words, the multiple rows that are in the reset state. In the case of a 4 row shutter, for example, a given row is read out for the long integration time image, followed by a reset that is present for the next 3 row readouts. The reset of the given row is then release, and the short integration time is initiated. The last row read out is shuttered and the 4-row rolling shutter moves across the pixel array in a row-wise manner, thus providing bloom protection to the shorter integration time region. Note that the beginning of the short integration time may be delayed compared to a traditional rolling shutter due to the width of the reset.


Furthermore, it is noted that the present technology is not limited to HDR imaging having only two integrations times, but the same or similar imaging process can be applied for a third, fourth, or more images having different integration times. Thus, in the above example, when the given row is read out for the second integration time, the row can be reset with a shutter having characteristics to provide bloom protection to a third integration image, and so on.


A variety of shutter configurations and shutter behaviors are contemplated, and can include any shutter scheme that provides blooming protection to HDR images. In general the shutter has at least two rows of pixels that are simultaneously shuttered to provide the blooming protection. In one aspect, as has been described, the shutter can be applied across 2, 3, 4, 5, or more directly adjacent rows. In another aspect, the shutter can be applied across 2, 3, 4, 5, or more rows that are not directly adjacent, or that contain directly adjacent rows and non-directly adjacent rows in the same shutter. For example, a 4 row shutter can be applied to rows 10, 11, 12, and 13, or a 4 row shutter can be applied to rows 10, 12, 14, and 16, or to rows 10, 13, 14, and 17, or any other combination that facilitates blooming protection.


As has been described, the chance of blooming can vary depending on the relative charge between the source of the blooming and the affected rows, the pixel size, the epitaxial layer thickness, etc. As such, the shutter configurations can be designed to account for such factors. In one aspect, the present technology can utilized epitaxial layer thicknesses of from about 1 to about 10 microns, and can have pixel sizes of from about 0.9 microns to about 30 microns, or from about 0.9 microns to about 6 microns, or from about 0.9 microns to about 3 microns, to name a few non-limiting examples. As the size of the pixel is decreased, an increase in the number of rows shuttered to prevent or reduce blooming may need to be increased. For example, in a 0.9 micron pixel, the shutter can be up to 30 rows or more in some cases. It is, however, within the skill of those in the art to readily calculate the necessary shutter durations to account for these variations, once in possession of the present disclosure.


Furthermore, various shutter behaviors are contemplated, and can vary depending on the design and/or complexity of the device. In one aspect, a device can have a fixed shutter scheme. For example, a shutter may be fixed at a 4 row width in a device no matter what the imaging conditions. In another aspect, the shutter in a device can be manually set by a user for a given image or image conditions. In other aspects, the device can include an automatic mode, where the shutter characteristics are automatically set to match lighting conditions. Additionally, hybrid approaches are contemplated whereby a user sets the device to behave in a desired manner, and the device automatically sets or varies the shutter characteristics to optimal or near optimal conditions within the parameters set by the user.


The shutter can additionally be varied within a given frame or image process. For example, in one aspect the device can increase the duration of the shutter between a long integration time process and a medium integration time process, but decrease the duration of the shutter between the medium integration time process and a shorter integration time process. Thus, the duration of the shutter can be increased during HDR image capture in between the image sections that may have blooming issues, but decreased in between image sections that are not as likely to experience blooming. While in some devices such a behavior may be fixed, in other aspects the device can contain logic to dynamically increase the shutter duration or to apply a given shutter pattern when blooming is detected or when a scene is detected where blooming may occur. So, the logic can dynamically adjust the shutter in between integration time images, or in some aspects during a given rolling shutter operation for a given integration time. If an image is being read out for a longer integration time and a potential for blooming is detected, for example, the logic can adjust the shutter to limit or preclude blooming from occurring.


Additionally, in some aspects the strength (i.e., the voltages applied) of the reset can be constant throughout the duration of a given shutter, while in other aspects the shutter strength can be variable. For example, one energy saving technique may be to hard reset a row as the shutter is applied, lower the reset voltage during the middle of the shutter, and hard reset the row again just prior to the initiation of the next integration cycle. Variations in the shutter strength can be fixed in the device, set by the user, and/or dynamically controlled by the device. In the dynamically controlled case, the logic of the device can be utilized to detect blooming or the potential for blooming, and can thus increase the strength of the reset during such blooming periods and decrease the strength when blooming potential is lower.


As is shown in FIG. 2, one exemplary method provides blooming to a CMOS imager having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, where the CMOS imager is operable to capture high dynamic range images using a rolling shutter. The method can include 202 selecting a readout row of pixels, 204 starting a first integration time of the pixels in the readout row, and 206 reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a first readout. The method also includes 208 applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row, 210 removing the reset and starting a second integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the second integration time is shorter than the first integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the second integration time, and 212 reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a second readout. It is noted that a subsequent row is a row that is read out or otherwise processed following the readout row. As such, applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row includes allowing the reset to continue on the reset row to at least give sufficient time for at least one subsequent row to be read out and reset. Thus, by allowing the reset of the readout row to be maintained for sufficient time to read out and reset two subsequent rows, a three row shutter has been implemented. Accordingly, in one aspect the reset can be applied for the reset time sufficient such that at least two subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset or in a reset state. In another aspect, the reset can be applied for the reset time sufficient such that at least three subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset or are in a reset state.


While it is convenient to describe reset and integration times in terms of row timing, it can also be useful to describe actual timing ranges. For example, in one aspect the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row can be from about 10 nanoseconds to about 50 microseconds. In another aspect, the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row can be from about 0.5 microseconds to about 2 microseconds. Understandably, these reset times can vary depending on the duration of the integration and the degree of potential blooming in the array. In another aspect, the first integration time can be from about 1 millisecond to about 1 second and the second integration time can be from about 10 nanoseconds to about 100 milliseconds. In yet another aspect, the first integration time can be from about 20 microseconds to about 33 milliseconds and the second integration time can be from about 1 microsecond to about 16 milliseconds.


As has been described, the present scope should also include shuttering or reset schemes that are sequential, non-sequential, adjacent, and non-adjacent. For example, in one specific aspect, the readout row and the at least three subsequent rows can be sequentially adjacent. In another aspect, the readout row and the at least three subsequent rows can be sequentially non-adjacent. The same would thus also apply to any number of subsequent rows greater than one (i.e., greater than two rows, the readout row and the at least one subsequent row).


Additionally, the method can be repeated for subsequent rows. In one aspect, for example, the method can be repeated on at least one subsequent row, at least two subsequent rows, at least three subsequent rows, and so on. In some aspects the at least one subsequent row is at least substantially all pixel rows in the pixel array. Furthermore, depending on the design of the device, the rows can be read out in various orders. For example, the method can be repeated on at least substantially all pixel rows in the pixel array in a sequential order. Such orders can include directly adjacent rows as a sequence, alternating rows as a sequence, and the like. Alternatively, the method can be repeated on at least substantially all pixel rows in the pixel array in a non-sequential order.


In addition to a first and second integration time, it is additionally contemplated that the present technology encompasses a third, fourth, or more integration times utilized to produce an HDR image. As such, in one aspect the method can further include applying the reset to the readout row following the second readout for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row, removing the reset and starting a third integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the third integration time is shorter than the second integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the third integration time, and reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a third readout. Similar steps can be accomplished for a fourth or more integration time.


It should be understood, however, that the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., should not be construed as meaning the first integration, second integration, and so on of a HDR image taken, but rather are intended to merely describe an order of execution of the integration times. Thus, in the method described above, for example, the terms “first” and “second” are merely describing two integration times that are temporally timed in the order of first and second. So in a HDR imaging process, the first integration time and the second integration time may represent the first and second integrations of the image, or they may represent the third and fourth, or the second and third, or any other pair of integration operations to which blooming protection applies. Thus, in cases where the first integration time corresponds to the first integration of a HDR image, starting the first integration time can include specifically applying the reset to the readout row and releasing the reset from the readout row. In cases where the first integration time described in the method does not correspond to the first integration of the HDR image, integration can be initiated by the readout and reset of the readout row from the previous integration.


As has been described, in one aspect the method can also include applying the reset at a continuous voltage level throughout the reset time duration. In another aspect, the reset can be applied at a variable voltage level throughout the reset time duration. Furthermore, in describing a multiple row shutter reset, it should be understood that for each subsequent readout and reset the reset voltage on each row of the shutter can be maintained or the reset voltage can be reapplied for each processing cycle. As a non-limiting example, for a shutter across rows five, six, seven, and eight, as row nine is read out the shutter moves to rows six, seven, eight, and nine, and is released from row five to begin integration of the next image part. In such a case, the reset can be maintained on rows six, seven, eight, and then applied to nine, or the reset can be reapplied to rows six, seven, eight, and then applied to nine. It is thus non-limiting as to how the shutter is applied and/or maintained, provided sufficient shutter is in place to prevent or limit blooming from corrupting across the shutter.


The method can additionally further include, in some aspects, the formation of a HDR image from the individual images derived from the different integrations, in some cases at different integration times. For example, in one aspect the first readout and the second readout can be combined to form a high dynamic range image. Thus, at a row level, the various integration times for each row can be combined to form the resulting image. At the image level, the row data from the various integration times can be formed into discrete images or image data sets and then the images or image data sets from each integration can be combined to form the HDR image. Thus, two integration images, three integration images, four integration images or more can be combined into the HDR image. In some cases, all integration images are combined, while in other cases only a subset of integration images are combined.


In another aspect of the present disclosure, as is shown in FIG. 3, a method of using a rolling shutter to provide blooming protection in a CMOS imager in high dynamic range mode and having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns is provided. Such a method can include 302 capturing a first image in the pixel array having a first integration time, 304 reading the first image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the first image, and 306 hard resetting a plurality of rows in proximity to the at least one readout row of the first image. The method also includes 308 capturing a second image in the pixel array having a second integration time, the second integration time being shorter than the first integration time, wherein the second image is protected from blooming caused by the first image by the hard resetting of the plurality of rows in proximity to the readout row of the first image, and 310 reading the second image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the second image.


As with the previous method aspects, the present method is not limited to two images, nor should the terms “first” and “second” be construed as necessarily the first and second images taken, but rather describe an order the images are captured. As such, in some aspects the method can further include hard resetting a plurality of rows in proximity to the at least one readout row of the second image, capturing a third image in the pixel array having a third integration time, the third integration time being shorter than the second integration time, wherein the third image is protected from blooming caused by the first or the second image by the hard resetting of the plurality of rows in proximity to the readout row of the second image, and reading the third image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the third image. In yet other aspects similar processing can be utilized to generate a fourth, fifth, sixth, or more images for HDR purposes.


Additionally, in some aspects the first image and the second image can be combined to form a HDR image. In other aspects, the first image, the second image, and the third image can be combined to form a HDR image. Thus, any number of images taken can be combined, either all together or a particular subset thereof, to form a HDR image.


The following is a more detailed description of the CMOS processing, components, and methodologies that may be useful in the practice and/or implementation of the present technology. It should be understood that wide variations in devices, device architectures, device design, and method implementation are contemplated that may depend, at least in part, on the particular CMOS technology used, the desired HDR capabilities, the specific types of lighting scenes in which HDR is utilized, various design preferences, device cost, and the like. As such, the present scope should not be accordingly limited. It should also be understood that those skilled in the art can readily design and produce systems and devices incorporating the present technology once in possession of the present disclosure. In some cases, this technology can be implemented into current HDR imagers using minimal row driver digital design modifications.


Furthermore, it is also contemplated that other beneficial technologies can also be implemented to further improve the HDR imaging process. One example of such a technology that can be utilized during a readout process is correlated double sampling (CDS). CDS is a technique for measuring a signal that allows for removal of an undesired offset and low frequency temporal noise (e.g. kTC noise for CMOS pixel). The output signal is thus measured twice: once in a known condition and once in an unknown condition. The value measured from the known condition is then subtracted from the unknown condition to generate a value with a known relation to the physical quantity being measured. In one aspect, a CDS operation can be performed on a row that is being read out from the imager.


In one example of a rolling shutter readout operation is shown, as a timing diagram, in FIG. 6. In this example, the integration time is 1 row. To read out the signal, the floating diffusion (FD) is reset with the reset signal (RST), and the signal from the FD will be sampled with the SHR signal. Next, TX will activate for charge transfer, and the signal will then be sampled with the SHS pulse. The difference between the SHR and SHS signals will be used for the final signal, which will be CDS mode. Following CDS, a shutter operation can be performed in which both RST and TX will be pulsed for the shutter row, or rows in some cases. This readout operation can then be repeated for other rows in the array.


As another example, a CDS operation can include setting the reset select transistor of the row being read to a high state and setting the power supply to a high power supply setting to set the floating diffusion regions to the high power supply setting in the row being read. As a non-limiting example, the power supply can be increased from 2.8 V to a high power supply setting of 3.1 V. The electrical charge in the floating diffusion regions can then be read to obtain a first electrical charge value. The transfer transistor of the row being read can then be set to a high state to transfer electrical charge in the photodiode to the floating diffusion regions of the row being read. Subsequently, the electrical charge in the floating diffusion regions can be read to obtain a second electrical charge value. The second charge value can then be subtracted from the first electrical charge value to obtain the CDS sampled output.


The following equations and techniques represent various methodologies to provide blooming protection using a rolling shutter in HDR imaging. Such are meant to be exemplary, and should not be seen as limiting. As such, various mathematical equations can be utilized in the understanding of the overall anti-blooming process, and such may be useful in the practice of the present technology.


In rolling shutter mode, a CMOS pixel array is read out essentially a row at a time, although in some aspects more than one row may be read out simultaneously or in an overlapping fashion. In the following equations, rc represents the readout row, or in other words, the pointer to the readout row. The readout can be accomplished by any readout technique. As has been described above, one beneficial readout technique is CDS mode readout, which allows for removal of an undesired offset and/or temporal noise associated with reset of floating diffusion (FD). CDS readout mode can be signified in the following equations by the term rCDS, which represents the readout row being read out in CDS mode. Thus in the case of rCDS1, as is shown in Equation (1), the physical row index is set to row 1 which is being read out, and the readout data has a CDS operation is applied to it.

rc=rCDS1  (1)


The term “shutter” refers to a shutter operation or a resetting operation of the pixels. As such, the terms “shutter” and “reset” can be used interchangeably, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. A reset can thus occur in a selected pixel or pixel row or rows to produce a “reset state,” or in other words a state in which the pixel is not in a charge accumulation or integration state. Thus a reset state is a state in which the pixel is not accumulating charge for the purpose of readout for imaging. In general, the reset is a reset voltage that is applied to the pixel to remove accumulated charge and to prevent or reduce further accumulation. It is additionally contemplated that the reset voltage can be applied and/or maintained at different levels, depending on the voltage applied and/or maintained in the pixel. So, for example, a complete reset can be applied to the pixel to at least substantially erase the accumulated charge and, if maintained in the pixel, to prevent or significantly prevent further charge accumulation. This initial strong or sharp voltage application can be referred to herein as a “hard reset.” In other cases, particularly for power saving operations, a lower voltage can be applied to and/or maintained in the pixel if desired. It is noted that in some cases a pixel can accumulate charge when in a reset state; however such charge accumulation is not a purposeful charge accumulation for readout of an image.


Accordingly, when a shutter is removed from a pixel, the pixel can begin accumulating charge from incoming photons. From the beginning of such charge accumulation to the readout of the pixel is generally referred to as the integration time of the pixel. Thus, in a rolling shutter mode, a shutter or reset voltage can be applied to a row of pixel to place the row in a reset state. When the reset voltage is removed, the row of pixels can then begin accumulating charge from incoming light and is thus in an integration state. For the purposes of the present disclosure, rshutteri is used to refer to the physical row index of a pixel row that is being shuttered for the ith pointer operation. Also, tint1 refers to the first pointer's integration time in units of row(s) and “tinti” refers to ith pointer's integration time in units of row(s). For example, a given row is reset and allowed to integrate charge over a given integration time. Thus the readout row rc is shuttered or reset and read out following an integration time in numbers of rows (tinti), as is described by Equation (2):

rshutteri=rc+tinti  (2)

In some aspects in rolling shutter mode, as a physical row rc is being read out, row rc+rshutter can be hard reset, where rshutter is at least one row, but can also include multiple rows in the imager array.


As has been described, blooming protection can be provided to HDR capture through the strategic use of a shutter in between at least two of the images used in the HDR imaging process. Such blooming protection thus effectively minimizes or prevents the crossover or blooming of charge from one region of the array to another. In the following equations, the term “p” is used to describe the blooming protection row count (or purge row count) in numbers of rows that is provided by this strategic shutter. It is noted that the rows may or may not be sequential, that various numbers of rows or patterns of rows can be used as blooming protection, and that such variations are intended to be within the present scope. Those of ordinary skill in the art would recognize appropriate variations in the equations and methodologies disclosed herein to account for such variations in design. In one aspect, however, p can be greater than one row, or more. Any number of rows or patterns of rows that can reduce or eliminate blooming are contemplated and included in the present scope.


As is shown in Equation (3), a shutter is applied to a row or rows of the array to provide protection from blooming.

rCDS1=rCDSi-1−tinti−p (for i>1)  (3)

While the terms of this equation indicate that the row is read out in CDS mode, it is also to be understood that any readout mode is additionally contemplated, and that CDS terminology is used merely for convenience. The same is true for the other equations shown herein.


Accordingly, a larger-than-1-row purge row count can enable the HDR imager device to have reduced blooming effects. This blooming purge count p provides additional shifts between different pointer operation regarding readout and shutter row index. The shift can be adjusted to achieve the proper anti-blooming properties given a particular scene. In Equation (4), the total shutter count of p times is allowed, and in this case provides the blooming protection. In one aspect, for example on a CMOS imager design, a (p+1) shutter can be executed sequentially after a readout such as CDS.

rshutteri=rCDSi-1−p,(rshutteri-1=rCDSi-1−p+1, . . . ,rshutteri-p-1=rCDSi-1)(for i>1,p≧0)  (4)


As one example, FIG. 4 graphically shows an exemplary embodiment having a first and second pointer row-wise HDR CMOS image sensor timing scheme without any blooming protection (e.g. p=0). In this timing scheme tint1=100 rows and tint2=3 rows. In this aspect it is assumed that the valid row address starts at row 1 and will end at row N. As such, the physical row readout for the first pointer will start on row 1 (CDS:1). Since the first integration time is 100 row units, row 101 is shuttered (S: 101) as row 1 is read out. It is noted in the timing scheme another row (CDS: −2) is also read out. Since the physical row −2 is non-existent no row data will be readout. Once read out, row 1 is shuttered (S:1) in preparation for the second integration.


In the next time frame, the 2″ physical row (CDS: 2) is read out in CDS mode. Since the integration time is 100 rows, row 102 is shuttered (S:102) and row 101 begins integration. Row 2 is shuttered (S:2) in preparation for the second integration of row 2, and the shutter is removed from row 1, which begins the second integration (tint2). Because the shutter is only one row wide, blooming can cross into the second integration time.


A similar timing scheme to FIG. 4 is shown in FIG. 5, but having blooming protection or blooming purge count of 3 rows (p=3). For this example, the integration times remain at tint1=100 row, tint2=3 row. It is noted that these integration times are merely exemplary, and any desired integration time can be used, in some cases depending on light intensity. The readout sequence for the first integration or the 1st pointer for row 1 is: CDS: 1; Shutter: 101, CDS: −5; Shutter: −2, −1, 0, 1. Since physical row index starts at 1, the CDS of row −5 will not produce any data since −5 is not a valid physical row address. For the 2nd pointer shutter operation, a total of 4 rows are being reset: −2, −1, 0, 1. If row 7 is read out for the 1st pointer, its CDS and shutter sequence will be derived by setting p=3 for Equations (1)-(4), for example. Thus, the resultant terms will be CDS: 7; Shutter: 107, 108, 109, 110; CDS: 1, Shutter: 4, 5, 6, 7. For the 2nd pointer shutter operation, a total of 4 rows are being reset sequentially: 4, 5, 6, and 7. Among those 4 sequential shutter operations, the 1st one (for row 4) is used to start integration of row 4 for the 2nd pointer. Additional bloom purge shutter 5, 6, 7 are used to provide blooming protection as has been described. If a high intensity light impinges on physical rows 5, 6, and 7, the intensity of the light spot can cause the pixel to reach saturation after 5 rows of integration time. Once rows 5, 6, and 7 are shuttered (reset), they change from a saturation state to an unsaturation state. For the same light intensity as used in the example of FIG. 4, rows 5, 6, and 7 will not reach saturation and blooming during row 4's integration for 2nd pointer or second integration time. Thus, the integration for row 4 will not be corrupted by blooming. Since the blooming purge count is set to 3 (p=3), the additional sequential shutter count is not more than 3. For example, sequential shutters can include 4, 5, or 4, 5, 6 in this case. Notably, depending on the scene, additional blooming purge shutters can provide better blooming protection. However, one caveat of using longer shutter durations can be, in some cases, a negative impact on frame rate depending on the imager readout architecture and how the shutter operation is applied. If the shutter operation is applied in parallel during ADC conversion and data readout, additional blooming purge shutter may not affect the frame rate. Since every row will be reset multiple times on average, signal levels of extremely hot pixels will also be reduced by the additional bloom purge shutters.


It is noted that in CMOS imager design, a register can be used for additional bloom purge shutter count. The value of this blooming purge count can be controlled by the user directly or other by image processing algorithms that detect blooming issues on the image. The row driver control logic can also be designed based on Equations (1)-(4) as shown above.


Furthermore, in one aspect the additional bloom purge shutter can be applied sequentially to each pointer's shutter operation. However, the application of the additional bloom purge shutter should apply only to a particular pointer operation. This can be beneficial if the additional blooming purge shutter has a negative impact on frame rate. For example, for a 2-pointer row-wise HDR image sensor, if tint1=100 row, and tint2=3 row, adding additional bloom purge shutter for the 1st pointer operation might not be necessary since the integration time is already 100 rows. The additional purge shutter can be applied to the 2nd pointer in order to correctly expose the brighter portions of a scene. For a 3-pointer row-wise HDR image sensor, for example, if tint1=100 rows, the tint2=20 rows and tint3=2 rows, and an intense light spot saturates the pixels with a 5 row integration time, the additional blooming purge shutter count of 3 can be applied only to the 3rd pointer shutter operation.


As examples, 3-pointer row-wise image sensor readout and shutter algorithms for a third integration time are shown in Equations (5)-(10). Similar equations can readily be derived therefrom for fourth, fifth, and greater integration times.

rCDS1=ri  (5)
rshutter1=ri+tint1  (6)
rCDS2=ri−tint2−1·p  (7)
rshutter2=ri−p,rshutter2-1=ri−p+1, . . . ,rshutter2_p-1=ri  (8)
rCDS3=ri−tint2−tint3−2·p  (9)
rshutter3=ri−tint2−2·p,rshutter3_1=ri−tint2−2·p+1, . . . ,rshutter3_p-1=ri−tint2−p  (10)


As another example and moving to the timing scheme where row 4 is read out for the 1st pointer, using the equations above, the CDS and shutter sequence can be calculated by setting p=0. The resultant parameters are the following: (CDS: 4; Shutter: 104; CDS: 1; Shutter: 4). The raw data from row 4 is read out; then a shutter is applied to rows 104, 105, 106, and 107; data from row 1 is read out, noting that the data readout of row 1 is after a 3 row integration time; and subsequently a shutter operation is applied to rows 4, 5, 6 and 7. It should be pointed out that row 4 will not be read out again until row 7 is read out. Equations (1)-(4) can be applied to the above example as follows; after row 4 is read out for first pointer operation, shutter is applied to row 104 (i.e. rc(4)+tint1(100)) for first point operation. Subsequently, row 1 is readout for 2nd pointer operation and a shutter is applied to row 4 (i.e. rshutter2=rCDS1−p=4−0=4) for the 2nd pointer operation. Since row 1 is a valid row address, its data will be output from the imager. It should be noted that, after readout of row 4 for the 1st pointer, the image data will be in a row-wise interlaced pattern in which an odd row will be associated with one integration time and even rows will be associated with a different integration time. After the above operation, row 4 starts integration for its second integration time. If a high intensity light spot is being integrated by rows 5, 6, and 7, the intensity of this light spot and can cause the pixel to reach saturation after about five (5) rows of integration time. Since rows 5, 6, and 7 are still in their first pointer operation (which has integration time of 100 rows), all those rows are saturated (since those rows previously integrated 99, 98, 97 rows already for physical rows 5, 6, 7, respectively) and start blooming into their neighboring rows. Therefore, the integrated signal of row 4 for the 2nd pointer will likely be corrupted from blooming from row 5, 6, and 7 (depending on the pixel size and doping conditions). Notably, pixels of the present technology can bloom into neighboring rows since row 5, 6, and 7 are not idle even if the image sensor is running a true “anti-blooming” timing. In a typical so-called “anti-blooming” timing, an idle row's reset (RST) and transfer (TX) gate are set to high and remain high during the entire idle period to provide blooming protection. An idle row refers to a physical row in the sensor array that is not in integration or in shutter operation. Additionally, idle rows could include all those rows that are outside the addressed image output windows. For example, in a sensor array with 100 rows, and the image output window is the center 50 rows, then the top 25 rows and the bottom 25 rows can be considered in an idle row operation or mode. To implement “anti-blooming” timing, a latch-based row decoder design is typically required. Therefore, an image sensor running such “anti-blooming” timing cannot protect the rows in a second pointer from blooming corruption.


Various benefits of the present technology include the reduction in die size due to not needing a latch-based row driver, flexible to handle 2-pointer, 3-pointer, or more pointer row-wise HDR operation, the reduction in hot pixel impact on final images since the pixels will reset multiple times in average, among other things.


The present scope additionally includes systems and devices utilizing the present technology. Such should include any CMOS device, system, architecture, and/or design that allows HDR imaging using a rolling shutter. As has been described, those skilled in the art can readily design and produce systems and devices incorporating the present technology once in possession of the present disclosure. In some cases, this technology can be implemented into current HDR imagers using minimal row driver digital design modifications.


The following are exemplary of various aspects of the present disclosure. In example 1, a method of providing blooming protection to a CMOS imager having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, where the CMOS imager is operable to capture high dynamic range images using a rolling shutter, is provided. Such a method can include selecting a readout row of pixels, starting a first integration time of the pixels in the readout row, reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a first readout, applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row, removing the reset and starting a second integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the second integration time is shorter than the first integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the second integration time, and reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a second readout.


In another example, the method of example 1 can be repeated on at least one subsequent row.


In another example, the at least one subsequent row is at least substantially all pixel rows in the pixel array.


In another example, the method of example 1 can be repeated on at least substantially all pixel rows in a sequential order.


In another example, the method of example 1 can be repeated on at least substantially all pixel rows in a non-sequential order.


In another example, the first readout and the second readout are combined to form a high dynamic range image.


In another example, the method of example 1 can further include applying the reset to the readout row following the second readout for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row, removing the reset and starting a third integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the third integration time is shorter than the second integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the third integration time, and reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a third readout.


In another example, the method can be repeated for a fourth or more integration time.


In another example, starting the first integration time further includes applying the reset to the readout row and releasing the reset from the readout row.


In another example, applying the reset to the readout row for the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row includes applying the reset at a continuous voltage level throughout the reset time duration.


In another example, applying the reset to the readout row for the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row includes applying the reset at a variable voltage level throughout the reset time duration.


In another example, the reset is applied for the reset time sufficient such that at least two subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset.


In another example, the reset is applied for the reset time sufficient such that at least three subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset.


In another example, the readout row and the at least three subsequent rows are sequentially adjacent.


In another example, the readout row and the at least three subsequent rows are sequentially non-adjacent.


In another example, the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row is from about 10 nanoseconds to about 50 microseconds.


In another example, the first integration time is from about 1 millisecond to about 1 second and the second integration time is from about 10 nanoseconds to about 100 milliseconds.


In another example, a method of using a rolling shutter to provide blooming protection in a CMOS imager in high dynamic range mode and having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns can include capturing a first image in the pixel array having a first integration time, reading the first image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the first image, hard resetting a plurality of rows in proximity to the at least one readout row of the first image, capturing a second image in the pixel array having a second integration time, the second integration time being shorter than the first integration time, wherein the second image is protected from blooming caused by the first image by the hard resetting of the plurality of rows in proximity to the readout row of the first image, and reading the second image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the second image.


In another example, the first image and the second image are combined to form a high dynamic range image.


In another example, the method can further include hard resetting a plurality of rows in proximity to the at least one readout row of the second image, capturing a third image in the pixel array having a third integration time, the third integration time being shorter than the second integration time, wherein the third image is protected from blooming caused by the first or the second image by the hard resetting of the plurality of rows in proximity to the readout row of the second image, and reading the third image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the third image.


In another example, the first image, the second image, and the third image are combined to form a high dynamic range image.


Of course, it is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present disclosure. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present disclosure has been described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical embodiments of the disclosure, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method of providing blooming protection to a CMOS imager having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, where the CMOS imager is operable to capture high dynamic range images using a rolling shutter, comprising: selecting a readout row of pixels;starting a first integration time of the pixels in the readout row;reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a first readout;applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least three subsequent rows, wherein the reset is applied for the reset time sufficient such that the at least three subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset;removing the reset and starting a second integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the second integration time is shorter than the first integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the second integration time; andreading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a second readout.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising repeating the method of claim 1 on at least one subsequent row.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one subsequent row is at least substantially all pixel rows in the pixel array.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the method is repeated on at least substantially all pixel rows in a sequential order.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the method is repeated on at least substantially all pixel rows in a non-sequential order.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first readout and the second readout are combined to form a high dynamic range image.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: applying the reset to the readout row following the second readout for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row;removing the reset and starting a third integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the third integration time is shorter than the second integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the third integration time; andreading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a third readout.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, repeated for a fourth or more integration time.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein starting the first integration time further includes applying the reset to the readout row and releasing the reset from the readout row.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the reset to the readout row for the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row includes applying the reset at a continuous voltage level throughout the reset time duration.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the reset to the readout row for the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least three subsequent rows includes applying the reset at a variable voltage level throughout the reset time duration.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the readout row and the at least three subsequent rows are sequentially adjacent.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the readout row and the at least three subsequent rows are sequentially non-adjacent.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least three subsequent rows is from about 10 nanoseconds to about 50 microseconds.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the first integration time is from about 1 millisecond to about 1 second and the second integration time is from about 10 nanoseconds to about 100 milliseconds.
  • 16. A method of using a rolling shutter to provide blooming protection in a CMOS imager in high dynamic range mode and having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, comprising: capturing a first image in the pixel array having a first integration time;reading the first image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the first image;hard resetting a plurality of rows in proximity to the at least one readout row of the first image;capturing a second image in the pixel array having a second integration time, the second integration time being shorter than the first integration time, wherein the second image is protected from blooming caused by the first image by the hard resetting of the plurality of rows in proximity to the readout row of the first image;reading the second image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the second image;hard resetting a plurality of rows in proximity to the at least one readout row of the second image;capturing a third image in the pixel array having a third integration time, the third integration time being shorter than the second integration time, wherein the third image is protected from blooming caused by the first or the second image by the hard resetting of the plurality of rows in proximity to the readout row of the second image; andreading the third image out of the pixel array sequentially by rows using at least one readout row of the third image.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the first image and the second image are combined to form a high dynamic range image.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the first image, the second image, and the third image are combined to form a high dynamic range image.
  • 19. A method of providing blooming protection to a CMOS imager having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, where the CMOS imager is operable to capture high dynamic range images using a rolling shutter, comprising: selecting a readout row of pixels;starting a first integration time of the pixels in the readout row;reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a first readout;applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row;removing the reset and starting a second integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the second integration time is shorter than the first integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the second integration time; andreading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a second readout;applying the reset to the readout row following the second readout for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row;removing the reset and starting a third integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the third integration time is shorter than the second integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the third integration time; andreading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a third readout.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, repeated for a fourth or more integration time.
  • 21. A method of providing blooming protection to a CMOS imager having a pixel array of a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns, where the CMOS imager is operable to capture high dynamic range images using a rolling shutter, comprising: selecting a readout row of pixels;starting a first integration time of the pixels in the readout row;reading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a first readout;applying a reset to the readout row for a reset time sufficient to allow readout and reset to occur in at least one subsequent row, wherein the reset is applied at a variable voltage level throughout the reset time duration;removing the reset and starting a second integration time of the pixels in the readout row, wherein the second integration time is shorter than the first integration time, and wherein the at least one subsequent row is a sufficient number of rows to have a combined reset to at least substantially preclude blooming effects from the pixel array in the readout row during the second integration time; andreading out charge accumulated by the pixels in the readout row to obtain a second readout.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the reset is applied for the reset time sufficient such that the at least two subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset.
  • 23. The method of claim 19, wherein the reset is applied for the reset time sufficient such that the at least two subsequent rows and the readout row are simultaneously reset.
PRIORITY DATA

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/765,599, filed on Feb. 15, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (526)
Number Name Date Kind
3487223 St. John Dec 1969 A
3922571 Smith Nov 1975 A
3973994 Redfield Aug 1976 A
3994012 Warner, Jr. Nov 1976 A
4017887 Davies et al. Apr 1977 A
4149174 Shannon Apr 1979 A
4176365 Kroger Nov 1979 A
4201450 Trapani May 1980 A
4242149 King et al. Dec 1980 A
4253882 Dalal Mar 1981 A
4277793 Webb Jul 1981 A
4322571 Stanbery Mar 1982 A
4419533 Czubatyj et al. Dec 1983 A
4452826 Shields et al. Jun 1984 A
4493942 Sheng et al. Jan 1985 A
4514582 Tiedje et al. Apr 1985 A
4536608 Sheng et al. Aug 1985 A
4568960 Petroff et al. Feb 1986 A
4593303 Dyck et al. Jun 1986 A
4593313 Nagasaki Jun 1986 A
4617593 Dudley Oct 1986 A
4630082 Sakai Dec 1986 A
4648936 Ashby et al. Mar 1987 A
4663188 Kane May 1987 A
4672206 Suzuki Jun 1987 A
4673770 Mandelkorn Jun 1987 A
4679068 Lillquist et al. Jul 1987 A
4751571 Lillquist Jun 1988 A
4775425 Guha et al. Oct 1988 A
4777490 Sharma et al. Oct 1988 A
4829013 Yamazaki May 1989 A
4883962 Elliott Nov 1989 A
4886958 Merryman Dec 1989 A
4887255 Handa et al. Dec 1989 A
4894526 Bethea et al. Jan 1990 A
4910568 Takei et al. Mar 1990 A
4910588 Kinoshita et al. Mar 1990 A
4964134 Westbrook et al. Oct 1990 A
4965784 Land et al. Oct 1990 A
4968372 Maass Nov 1990 A
4999308 Nishiura et al. Mar 1991 A
5021100 Ishihara et al. Jun 1991 A
5021854 Huth Jun 1991 A
5080725 Green et al. Jan 1992 A
5081049 Green et al. Jan 1992 A
5100478 Kawabata Mar 1992 A
5101260 Nath Mar 1992 A
5114876 Weiner May 1992 A
5127964 Hamakawa et al. Jul 1992 A
5164324 Russell et al. Nov 1992 A
5208822 Haus et al. May 1993 A
5223043 Olson et al. Jun 1993 A
5234790 Lang et al. Aug 1993 A
5244817 Hawkins et al. Sep 1993 A
5296045 Banerjee et al. Mar 1994 A
5309275 Nishimura et al. May 1994 A
5322988 Russell et al. Jun 1994 A
5346850 Kaschmitter et al. Sep 1994 A
5351446 Langsdorf Oct 1994 A
5370747 Noguchi et al. Dec 1994 A
5373182 Norton Dec 1994 A
5381431 Zayhowski Jan 1995 A
5383217 Uemura Jan 1995 A
5390201 Tomono et al. Feb 1995 A
5413100 Barthelemy et al. May 1995 A
5449626 Hezel Sep 1995 A
5454347 Shibata et al. Oct 1995 A
5502329 Pezzani Mar 1996 A
5523570 Hairston Jun 1996 A
5559361 Pezzani Sep 1996 A
5569615 Yamazaki et al. Oct 1996 A
5578858 Mueller et al. Nov 1996 A
5580615 Itoh et al. Dec 1996 A
5589008 Kepper Dec 1996 A
5589704 Levine Dec 1996 A
5597621 Hummel et al. Jan 1997 A
5600130 VanZeghbroeck Feb 1997 A
5626687 Campbell May 1997 A
5627081 Tsuo et al. May 1997 A
5635089 Singh et al. Jun 1997 A
5640013 Ishikawa et al. Jun 1997 A
5641362 Meier Jun 1997 A
5641969 Cooke et al. Jun 1997 A
5705413 Harkin et al. Jan 1998 A
5705828 Noguchi et al. Jan 1998 A
5708486 Miyawaki et al. Jan 1998 A
5710442 Watanabe et al. Jan 1998 A
5714404 Mititsky et al. Feb 1998 A
5727096 Ghirardi et al. Mar 1998 A
5731213 Ono Mar 1998 A
5751005 Wyles et al. May 1998 A
5758644 Diab et al. Jun 1998 A
5766127 Pologe et al. Jun 1998 A
5766964 Rohatgi et al. Jun 1998 A
5773820 Osajda et al. Jun 1998 A
5779631 Chance Jul 1998 A
5781392 Clark Jul 1998 A
5792280 Ruby et al. Aug 1998 A
5808350 Jack et al. Sep 1998 A
5859446 Nagasu et al. Jan 1999 A
5861639 Bernier Jan 1999 A
5923071 Saito Jul 1999 A
5935320 Graef et al. Aug 1999 A
5942789 Morikawa Aug 1999 A
5943584 Shim et al. Aug 1999 A
5963790 Matsuno et al. Oct 1999 A
5977603 Ishikawa Nov 1999 A
6071796 Voutsas Jun 2000 A
6072117 Matsuyama et al. Jun 2000 A
6080988 Ishizuya et al. Jun 2000 A
6082858 Grace et al. Jul 2000 A
6097031 Cole Aug 2000 A
6106689 Matsuyama Aug 2000 A
6107618 Fossum et al. Aug 2000 A
6111300 Cao et al. Aug 2000 A
6147297 Wettling et al. Nov 2000 A
6160833 Floyd et al. Dec 2000 A
6168965 Malinovich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6194722 Fiorini et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204506 Akahori et al. Mar 2001 B1
6229192 Gu May 2001 B1
6252256 Ugge et al. Jun 2001 B1
6290713 Russell Sep 2001 B1
6291302 Yu Sep 2001 B1
6313901 Cacharelis Nov 2001 B1
6320296 Fujii et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327022 Nishi Dec 2001 B1
6331445 Janz et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331885 Nishi Dec 2001 B1
6340281 Haraguchi Jan 2002 B1
6372591 Mineji et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372611 Horikawa Apr 2002 B1
6379979 Connolly Apr 2002 B1
6420706 Lurie et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429036 Nixon et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429037 Wenham et al. Aug 2002 B1
6465860 Shigenaka et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475839 Zhang et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483116 Kozlowski et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483929 Murakami et al. Nov 2002 B1
6486522 Bishay et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493567 Krivitski et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498336 Tian et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500690 Yamagishi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504178 Carlson et al. Jan 2003 B2
6580053 Voutsas Jun 2003 B1
6583936 Kaminsky et al. Jun 2003 B1
6597025 Lauter et al. Jul 2003 B2
6607927 Ramappa et al. Aug 2003 B2
6624049 Yamazaki Sep 2003 B1
6639253 Duane et al. Oct 2003 B2
6667528 Cohen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6677655 Fitzergald Jan 2004 B2
6677656 François Jan 2004 B2
6683326 Iguchi et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689209 Falster et al. Feb 2004 B2
6753585 Kindt Jun 2004 B1
6759262 Theil et al. Jul 2004 B2
6790701 Shigenaka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800541 Okumura Oct 2004 B2
6801799 Mendelson Oct 2004 B2
6803555 Parrish et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815685 Wany Nov 2004 B2
6818535 Lu et al. Nov 2004 B2
6822313 Matsushita Nov 2004 B2
6825057 Heyers et al. Nov 2004 B1
6864156 Conn Mar 2005 B1
6864190 Han et al. Mar 2005 B2
6867806 Lee et al. Mar 2005 B1
6900839 Kozlowski et al. May 2005 B1
6907135 Gifford Jun 2005 B2
6911375 Guarini et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919587 Ballon et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923625 Sparks Aug 2005 B2
6927432 Holm et al. Aug 2005 B2
6984816 Holm et al. Jan 2006 B2
7008854 Forbes Mar 2006 B2
7041525 Clevenger et al. May 2006 B2
7057256 Carey, III et al. Jun 2006 B2
7075079 Wood Jul 2006 B2
7091411 Falk et al. Aug 2006 B2
7109517 Zaidi Sep 2006 B2
7126212 Enquist et al. Oct 2006 B2
7132724 Merrill Nov 2006 B1
7202102 Yao Apr 2007 B2
7211501 Liu et al. May 2007 B2
7235812 Chu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7247527 Shimomura et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247812 Tsao Jul 2007 B2
7256102 Nakata et al. Aug 2007 B2
7271445 Forbes Sep 2007 B2
7271835 Iizuka et al. Sep 2007 B2
7285482 Ochi Oct 2007 B2
7314832 Kountz et al. Jan 2008 B2
7354792 Carey, III et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358498 Geng et al. Apr 2008 B2
7375378 Manivannan et al. May 2008 B2
7390689 Mazur et al. Jun 2008 B2
7432148 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442629 Mazur et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446359 Lee et al. Nov 2008 B2
7446807 Hong Nov 2008 B2
7456452 Wells et al. Nov 2008 B2
7482532 Yi et al. Jan 2009 B2
7498650 Lauxtermann Mar 2009 B2
7504325 Koezuka et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504702 Mazur et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511750 Murakami Mar 2009 B2
7521737 Augusto Apr 2009 B2
7528463 Forbes May 2009 B2
7542085 Altice, Jr. et al. Jun 2009 B2
7547616 Fogel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551059 Farrier Jun 2009 B2
7560750 Niira et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564631 Li et al. Jul 2009 B2
7582515 Choi et al. Sep 2009 B2
7592593 Kauffman et al. Sep 2009 B2
7595213 Kwon et al. Sep 2009 B2
7605397 Kindem et al. Oct 2009 B2
7615808 Pain et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618839 Rhodes Nov 2009 B2
7619269 Ohkawa Nov 2009 B2
7629582 Hoffman et al. Dec 2009 B2
7648851 Fu et al. Jan 2010 B2
7649156 Lee Jan 2010 B2
7705879 Kerr et al. Apr 2010 B2
7731665 Lee et al. Jun 2010 B2
7741666 Nozaki et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745901 McCaffrey et al. Jun 2010 B1
7763913 Fan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7772028 Adkisson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7781856 Mazur et al. Aug 2010 B2
7800192 Venezia et al. Sep 2010 B2
7800684 Tatani Sep 2010 B2
7816220 Mazur et al. Oct 2010 B2
7828983 Weber et al. Nov 2010 B2
7847253 Carey et al. Dec 2010 B2
7847326 Park et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855406 Yamaguchi et al. Dec 2010 B2
7875498 Elbanhawy et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880168 Lenchenkov Feb 2011 B2
7884439 Mazur et al. Feb 2011 B2
7884446 Mazur et al. Feb 2011 B2
7897942 Bareket Mar 2011 B1
7910964 Kawahito et al. Mar 2011 B2
7923801 Tian et al. Apr 2011 B2
7968834 Veeder Jun 2011 B2
8008205 Fukushima et al. Aug 2011 B2
8013411 Cole Sep 2011 B2
8030726 Sumi Oct 2011 B2
8035343 Seman, Jr. Oct 2011 B2
8058615 McCaffrey Nov 2011 B2
8080467 Carey et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088219 Knerer et al. Jan 2012 B2
8093559 Rajavel Jan 2012 B1
RE43169 Parker Feb 2012 E
8164126 Moon et al. Apr 2012 B2
8207051 Sickler et al. Jun 2012 B2
8247259 Grolier et al. Aug 2012 B2
8259293 Andreou et al. Sep 2012 B2
8288702 Veeder Oct 2012 B2
8470619 Bour Jun 2013 B2
8476681 Haddad et al. Jul 2013 B2
8564087 Yamamura et al. Oct 2013 B2
8603902 Mazur et al. Dec 2013 B2
8629485 Yamamura et al. Jan 2014 B2
8680591 Haddad et al. Mar 2014 B2
8742528 Yamamura et al. Jun 2014 B2
8884226 Miyazaki et al. Nov 2014 B2
8906670 Gray Dec 2014 B2
8916945 Sakamoto et al. Dec 2014 B2
8994135 Yamamura et al. Mar 2015 B2
9184204 Hu Nov 2015 B2
9190551 Yamamura et al. Nov 2015 B2
9209345 Haddad Dec 2015 B2
9369641 Hu Jun 2016 B2
20010017344 Aebi Aug 2001 A1
20010022768 Takahashi Sep 2001 A1
20010044175 Barrett et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010044266 Katsuoka Nov 2001 A1
20020020893 Lhorte Feb 2002 A1
20020024618 Imai Feb 2002 A1
20020056845 Iguchi et al. May 2002 A1
20020060322 Tanabe et al. May 2002 A1
20020079290 Holdermann Jun 2002 A1
20020117699 Francois Aug 2002 A1
20020148964 Dausch et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020182769 Campbell Dec 2002 A1
20030029495 Mazur et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030030083 Lee et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045092 Shin Mar 2003 A1
20030057357 Uppal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030111106 Nagano et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030210332 Frame Nov 2003 A1
20030213515 Sano et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030214595 Mabuchi Nov 2003 A1
20030228883 Kusakari et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040014307 Shin et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040016886 Ringermacher et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040041168 Hembree et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040046224 Rossel et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040077117 Ding et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040080638 Lee Apr 2004 A1
20040130020 Kuwabara et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040161868 Hong Aug 2004 A1
20040222187 Lin Nov 2004 A1
20040252931 Belleville et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050051822 Manning Mar 2005 A1
20050062041 Terakawa et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050088634 Kosugi Apr 2005 A1
20050093100 Chen et al. May 2005 A1
20050101100 Kretchmer et al. May 2005 A1
20050101160 Garg et al. May 2005 A1
20050127401 Mazur et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134698 Schroeder et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050150542 Madan Jul 2005 A1
20050158969 Binns et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050211996 Krishna et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050227390 Shtein et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060006482 Rieve et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060011954 Ueda et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060011955 Baggenstoss Jan 2006 A1
20060060848 Chang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071254 Rhodes Apr 2006 A1
20060079062 Mazur et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060086956 Furukawa et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060097172 Park May 2006 A1
20060118781 Rhodes Jun 2006 A1
20060121680 Tanaka Jun 2006 A1
20060128087 Bamji et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060132633 Nam et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060138396 Lin et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060145148 Hirai et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060145176 Lee Jul 2006 A1
20060160343 Chong et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060166475 Mantl Jul 2006 A1
20060175529 Harmon et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060180885 Rhodes Aug 2006 A1
20060181627 Farrier Aug 2006 A1
20060210122 Cleveland Sep 2006 A1
20060214121 Schrey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060228897 Timans Oct 2006 A1
20060231914 Carey et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238632 Shah Oct 2006 A1
20060244090 Roy et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060255340 Manivannan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257140 Seger Nov 2006 A1
20070035849 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070035879 Hall et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070051876 Sumi et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070052050 Dierickx Mar 2007 A1
20070076481 Tennant Apr 2007 A1
20070115554 Breitung et al. May 2007 A1
20070123005 Hiura et al. May 2007 A1
20070138590 Wells et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070145505 Kim et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070178672 Tanaka et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070187670 Hsu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189583 Shimada et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194356 Moon et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194401 Nagai et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070195056 Lloyd Aug 2007 A1
20070200940 Gruhlke et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201859 Sarrat Aug 2007 A1
20070235827 Altice Oct 2007 A1
20070237504 Nakashiba Oct 2007 A1
20070247414 Roberts Oct 2007 A1
20070262366 Baek et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070290283 Park et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070296060 Tanabe et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002863 Northcott et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080020555 Shimomura et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080026550 Werner et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080036022 Hwang et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080044943 Mazur et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080076240 Veschtti et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080099804 Venezia May 2008 A1
20080121280 Carnel et al. May 2008 A1
20080121805 Tweet et al. May 2008 A1
20080158398 Yoel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170173 Park et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080173620 Grek Jul 2008 A1
20080174685 Shan Jul 2008 A1
20080178932 Den Boer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179762 Cho et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080191310 Wu et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080192132 Bechtel et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080192133 Abiru Aug 2008 A1
20080196761 Nakano et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080198251 Xu Aug 2008 A1
20080202576 Hieslmair Aug 2008 A1
20080213936 Hatai Sep 2008 A1
20080223436 den Boer et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080242005 Dozen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080257409 Li et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080258604 Mazur et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266434 Sugawa et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266435 Agranov et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281174 Dietiker Nov 2008 A1
20080284884 Eiji et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080309913 Fallon Dec 2008 A1
20090002528 Manabe Jan 2009 A1
20090014056 Hockaday Jan 2009 A1
20090027640 Shibazaki Jan 2009 A1
20090038669 Atanackovic Feb 2009 A1
20090039397 Chao Feb 2009 A1
20090050944 Hong Feb 2009 A1
20090056797 Barnett et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090057536 Hirose Mar 2009 A1
20090065051 Chan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090078316 Khazeni et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090093100 Chen Apr 2009 A1
20090095887 Saveliev Apr 2009 A1
20090097290 Chandrasekaran Apr 2009 A1
20090101197 Morikawa Apr 2009 A1
20090109305 Dai et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114630 Hawryluk May 2009 A1
20090142879 Isaka et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090146240 Carey, III et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090160983 Lenchenkov Jun 2009 A1
20090180010 Adkisson et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090194671 Nozaki et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090200454 Barbier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090200586 Mao et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090200626 Qian et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090200631 Tai et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090206237 Shannon et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090211627 Meier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090213883 Mazur et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090218493 McCaffrey et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090223561 Kim et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227061 Bateman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090242032 Yamazaki et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090242933 Hu et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090256156 Hsieh Oct 2009 A1
20090256226 Tatani et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090261255 Nakamura et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090283807 Adkisson et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294787 Nakaji et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090308450 Adibi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090308457 Smith Dec 2009 A1
20100000597 Cousins Jan 2010 A1
20100013036 Carey Jan 2010 A1
20100013039 Qian et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100013593 Luckhardt Jan 2010 A1
20100024871 Oh et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032008 Adekore Feb 2010 A1
20100037952 Lin Feb 2010 A1
20100038523 Venezia et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038542 Carey et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040981 Kiesel et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100044552 Chen Feb 2010 A1
20100051809 Onat et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100052088 Carey Mar 2010 A1
20100053382 Kuniba Mar 2010 A1
20100055887 Piwczyk Mar 2010 A1
20100059385 Li Mar 2010 A1
20100059803 Gidon et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100072349 Veeder Mar 2010 A1
20100074396 Schmand et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100083997 Hovel Apr 2010 A1
20100084009 Carlson et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100096718 Hynecek et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100097609 Jaeger et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100102206 Cazaux et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100109060 Mao et al. May 2010 A1
20100116312 Peumans et al. May 2010 A1
20100117181 Kim et al. May 2010 A1
20100118172 McCarten et al. May 2010 A1
20100128937 Yoo et al. May 2010 A1
20100133635 Lee et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100140733 Lee et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100140768 Zafiropoulo et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100143744 Gupta Jun 2010 A1
20100147383 Carey et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100200658 Olmstead et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100219506 Gupta Sep 2010 A1
20100224229 Pralle et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100240169 Petti et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100245647 Honda et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100258176 Kang et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100264473 Adkisson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100289885 Lu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290668 Friedman et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300505 Chen Dec 2010 A1
20100300507 Heng et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100313932 Kroll et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110056544 Ji et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110073976 Vaillant Mar 2011 A1
20110095387 Carey et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110104850 Weidman et al. May 2011 A1
20110127567 Seong Jun 2011 A1
20110140221 Venezia et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110194100 Thiel et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110220971 Haddad Sep 2011 A1
20110227138 Haddad Sep 2011 A1
20110251478 Wieczorek Oct 2011 A1
20110260059 Jiang et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110266644 Yamamura et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110292380 Bamji Dec 2011 A1
20110303999 Sakamoto et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120024364 Carey et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120038811 Ellis-monaghan et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120043637 King et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120049242 Atanackovic et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120111396 Saylor et al. May 2012 A1
20120171804 Moslehi et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120187190 Wang et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120222396 Clemen Sep 2012 A1
20120291859 Vineis et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300037 Laudo Nov 2012 A1
20120305063 Moslehi et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120312304 Lynch et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120313204 Haddad et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120313205 Haddad et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120326008 Mckee et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130001553 Vineis et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130082343 Fudaba et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130135439 Kakuko et al. May 2013 A1
20130168792 Haddad et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130168803 Haddad et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130200251 Velichko Aug 2013 A1
20130207214 Haddad et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130285130 Ting Oct 2013 A1
20140198240 Rhoads Jul 2014 A1
20140247378 Sharma Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (77)
Number Date Country
3666484 Jun 1985 AU
101404307 Apr 2009 CN
19838439 Apr 2000 DE
0473439 Mar 1992 EP
0566156 Oct 1993 EP
1630871 Jan 2006 EP
1873840 Jan 2008 EP
2073270 May 2012 EP
2509107 Oct 2012 EP
2827707 Jan 2003 FR
2030766 Apr 1980 GB
S5771188 May 1982 JP
S57173966 Oct 1982 JP
S63116421 May 1988 JP
H02152226 Jun 1990 JP
H02237026 Sep 1990 JP
H03183037 Aug 1991 JP
H04318970 Nov 1992 JP
H06104414 Apr 1994 JP
H06244444 Sep 1994 JP
H06267868 Sep 1994 JP
H06275641 Sep 1994 JP
2007183484 Jul 1995 JP
9148594 Jun 1997 JP
H09298308 Nov 1997 JP
11077348 Mar 1999 JP
11097724 Apr 1999 JP
2000164914 Jun 2000 JP
2001007381 Jan 2001 JP
2001024936 Jan 2001 JP
2001189478 Jul 2001 JP
2001257927 Sep 2001 JP
2001339057 Dec 2001 JP
2002043594 Feb 2002 JP
2002134640 May 2002 JP
2002513176 May 2002 JP
2003163360 Jun 2003 JP
2003242125 Aug 2003 JP
2003258285 Sep 2003 JP
2003308130 Oct 2003 JP
2004273886 Sep 2004 JP
2005339425 Dec 2005 JP
2006173381 Jun 2006 JP
2006255430 Sep 2006 JP
2007165909 Jun 2007 JP
2007180642 Jul 2007 JP
2007180643 Jul 2007 JP
2007305675 Nov 2007 JP
2008187003 Aug 2008 JP
2008283219 Nov 2008 JP
2009021479 Jan 2009 JP
2009152569 Jul 2009 JP
2010278472 Dec 2010 JP
2011091128 May 2011 JP
20010061058 Apr 2001 KR
2005039273 Apr 2005 KR
100825808 Apr 2008 KR
20090077274 Jul 2009 KR
20100118864 Nov 2010 KR
20060052278 May 2016 KR
WO 9114284 Sep 1991 WO
WO 0031679 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0241363 May 2002 WO
WO 03059390 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2006086014 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2008091242 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2008099524 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008145097 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009016846 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009100023 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009147085 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2010033127 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2011003871 Jan 2011 WO
WO 2011035188 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011119618 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2012174752 Dec 2012 WO
WO 2014110484 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (143)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 11, 2014, in corresponding PCT/US2014/016979,(11 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Aug. 18, 2015, in corresponding PCT/US2014/016979,(7 pages).
Solhusvik, J. et al. “A 1280×960 3.75um pixel CMOS imager with Triple Exposure HDR,” Proc. of 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, Jun. 22-28, 2009.
A. Arndt, J.F. Allison, J.G. Haynos, and A. Meulenberg, Jr., “Optical Properties of the COMSAT Non-reflective Cell,” 11th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., p. 40, 1975.
Asom et al., Interstitial Defect Reactions in Silicon; Appl. Phys. Lett.; Jul. 27, 1987; pp. 256-258; vol. 51(4); American Institute of Physics.
Berger, Michael; Moth Eyes Inspire Self-Cleaning Antireflection Nanotechnology Coatings; 2008; 3 pages; Nanowerk LLC.
Berger, O., Inns, D. and Aberle, A.E. “Commercial White Paint as Back Surface Reflector for Thin-Film Solar Cells”, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol. 91, pp. 1215-1221,2007.
Betta et al.; Si-PIN X-Ray Detector Technology; Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research; 1997; pp. 344-348; vol. A, No. 395; Elsevier Science B.V.
Boden, S.A. et al.; Nanoimprinting for Antireflective Moth-Eye Surfaces; 4 pages; 2008.
Bogue: “From bolometers to beetles: the development of the thermal imaging sensors;” sensor Review; 2007; pp. 278-281; Emerald Group Publishing Limited (ISSN 0260-2288).
Borghesi et al.; “Oxygen Precipitation in Silicon,” J. Appl. Phys., v. 77(9), pp. 4169-4244 (May 1, 1995).
Born, M. and E.Wolf, “Princip les of Optics, 7th Ed.”, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 246-255.
Brieger,S., O.Dubbers, S.Fricker, A.Manzke, C.Pfahler, A.Plettl, and P.Zlemann, “An Approach for the Fabrication of Hexagonally Ordered Arrays of Cylindrical Nanoholes in Crystalline and Amorphous Silicon Based on the Self-Organization of Polymer Micelles”, Nanotechnology, vol. 17, pp. 4991-4994, 2006, doi:10.1088/0957-4884/17/19/036.
Buttgen, B.; “Demodulation Pixel Based on Static Drift Fields”; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 11, Nov. 2006.
Carey et al., “Femtosecond-Laser-Assisted Microstructuring of Silicon Surfaces”, Optics and Photonics News, 2003. 14, 32-36.
Carey, et al. “Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Microstructuring of Silicon for Novel Detector, Sensing and Display Technologies”, LEOS 2003, 481-482, Tuscon, AR.
Carey, et al. “Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Microstructuring of Silicon for Novel Detector, Sensing and Display Technologies”, LEOS; 2002, 97-98, Glasgos, Scotland, 2002.
Carey, et al., “Fabrication of Micrometer-Sized Conical Field Emitters Using Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Etching of Silicon,” Proc. IVMC 2001, 75-76, UC Davis, Davis, CA.
Carey, et al., “Field Emission from Silicon. Microstructures Formed by Femtosecond Laser Assisted Etching,” Proc. CLEO 2001 (Baltimore, MD 2001) 555-557.
Carey, et al., “High Sensitivity Silicon-Based VIS/NIR Photodetectors”, Optical Society of America (2003) 1-2.
Carey, III; “Femtosecond-laser Microstructuring of Silicon for Novel Optoelectronic Devices”; Harvard University, Jul. 2004; (Thesis).
Chang, S.W., V.P.Chuang, S.T.Boles, and C.V.Thompson, “Metal-Catalyzed Etching of Vertically Aligned Polysilicon and Amorphous Silicon Nanowire Arrays by Etching Direction Confinement”, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 20, No. 24, pp. 4364-4370, 2010.
Chen, Q. et al.; Broadband moth-eye antireflection coatings fabricated by low-cost nanoimprinting; Applied Physics Letters 94; pp. 263118-1-263118-3; 2009; American Institute of Physics.
Chien et al, “Pulse Width Effect in Ultrafast Laser Processing of Materials,” Applied Physics A, 2005, 1257-1263, 81, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
CMOSIS; “Global Shutter Image Sensors for Machine Vision Application”; Image Sensors Europe 2010, Mar. 23-25, 2010; .COPYRGT. copyright 2010.
Cotter, Jeffrey E.; Optical intensity of light in layers of silicon with rear diffuse reflectors; Journal of Applied Physics; Jul. 1, 1998; pp. 618-624; vol. 84, No. 1; American Institute of Physics.
Crouch et al., “Comparison of Structure and Properties of Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser-Structured Silicon” Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 84,1850-1852.
Crouch et al., “Infrared Absorption by Sulfur-Doped Silicon Formed by Femtosecond Laser Irradiation”, Appl. Phys. A, 2004, 79, 1635-1641.
Despeisse, et al.; “Thin Film Silicon Solar Cell on Highly Textured Substrates for High Conversion Efficiency”; 2004.
Detection of X-ray and Gamma-ray Photons Using Silicon Diodes; Dec. 2000; Detection Technology, Inc.; Micropolis, Finland.
Dewan, Rahul et al.; Light Trapping in Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells with Submicron Surface Texture; Optics Express; vol. 17, No. 25; Dec. 7, 2009; Optical Society of America.
Deych et al.; Advances in Computed Tomography and Digital Mammography; Power Point; Nov. 18, 2008; Analogic Corp.; Peabody, MA.
Dobie, et al.; “Minimization of reflected light in photovoltaic modules”; Mar. 1, 2009.
Dobrzanski, L.A. et al.; Laser Surface Treatment of Multicrystalline Silicon for Enhancing Optical Properties; Journal of Materials Processing Technology; p. 291-296; 2007; Elsevier B.V.
Dolgaev et al., “Formation of Conical Microstructures Upon Laser Evaporation of Solids”, Appl. Phys. A, 2001, 73, 177-181.
Duerinckx, et al.; “Optical Path Length Enhancement for >13% Screenprinted Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells”; 2006.
Dulinski, Wojciech et al.; Tests of backside illumincated monolithic CMOS pixel sensor in an HPD set-up; Nuclear Instruments and methods in Physics Research; Apr. 19, 2005; pp. 274-280; Elsevier B.V.
Forbes; “Texturing, reflectivity, diffuse scattering and light trapping in silicon solar cells”; 2012.
Forbes, L. and M.Y. Louie, “Backside Nanoscale Texturing to Improve IR Response of Silicon Photodetectors and Solar Cells,” Nanotech, vol. 2, pp. 9-12, Jun. 2010.
Fowlkes et al., “Surface Microstructuring and Long-Range Ordering of Silicon Nanoparticles”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2002, 80 (20), 3799-3801.
Gjessing, J. et al.; 2D back-side diffraction grating for impored light trapping in thin silicon solar cells; Optics Express; vol. 18, No. 6; pp. 5481-5495; Mar. 15, 2010; Optical Society of America.
Gjessing, J. et al.; 2D blazed grating for light trapping in thin silicon solar cells; 3 pages; 2010; Optical Society of America.
Goetzberger, et al.; “Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells”; vol. 92 (2008) pp. 1570-1578.
Han et al., “Evaluation of a Small Negative Transfer Gate Bias on the Performance of 4T CMOS Image Sensor Pixels,” 2007 International Image Sensor Workshop, 238-240, Ogunquit, Maine.
Haug, et al.; “Light Trapping effects in thin film silicon solar cells”; 2009.
Her et al., “Microstructuring of Silicon with Femtosecond Laser Pulses,” Applied Physics Letters, 1998, 1673-1675, vol. 73, No. 12, American Institute of Physics.
Her et al., “Novel Conical Microstructures Created in Silicon With Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, CLEO 1998, 511-512, San Francisco, CA.
Her, et al., “Femtosecond laser-induced formation of spikes on silicon,” Applied Physics A, 2000, 70, 383-385.
Hermann, S. et al.; Impact of Surface Topography and Laser Pulse Duration for Laser Ablation of Solar Cell Front Side Passivating SiNx Layers; Journal of Applied Physics; vol. 108, No. 11; pp. 114514-1-114514-8; 2010; American Institute of Physics.
High-Performance Technologies for Advanced Biomedical Applications; .COPYRGT. 2004Brochure; pp. 1-46; PerkinElmerOptoelectronics.
Holland; Fabrication of Detectors and Transistors on High-Resistivity Silicon; Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, vol. A275, pp. 537-541 (1989).
Hong et al., “Cryogenic processed metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) photodetectors on MBE grown ZnSe,”, 1999, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1127-1134.
Hsieh et al., “Focal-Plane-Arrays and CMOS Readout Techniques of Infrared Imaging Systems,” IEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 1997, vol. 7, No. 4, Aug. 1997, 594-605.
Hu et al., “Solar Cells from Basic to Advanced Systems,” McGraw Hill Book Co., 1983, 39, New York, New York.
Huang, et al.; “Microstructured silicon photodetector”; Applied Physics Letters 89, 033506; 2006 American Institute of Physics; 2006.
Hüpkes, J. et al.; Light Scattering and Trapping in Different Thin Film Photovoltaic Devices; 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Hamburg, Germany (Sep. 21-25, 2009); pp. 2766-2769.
“Infrared Absorption by Sulfur-Doped Silicon formed by Femtosecond Laser Irradiation”; Springer Berline/Heidelberg, vol. 79, Nov. 2004.
Job et al., “Doping of Oxidized Float Zone Silincon by Thermal Donors—A low Thermal Budget Doping Method for Device Applications?” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Pro.; v. 719, F9.5.1-F9.5.6 (2002).
Joy, T. et al.; Development of a Production-Ready, Back-Illuminated CMOS Image Sensor with Small Pixels; Electron Devices Meeting; pp. 1007-1010; 2007; IEEE.
Juntunen et al.; Advanced Photodiode Detector for Medical CT Imaging: Design and Performance; 2007; pp. 2730-2735; IEEE.
Kim et al.; “Strong Sub-Band-Gap Infrared Absorption in Silicon Supersaturated with Sulfur”; 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 241902-1-241902-3.
Kolasinski et al., “Laser Assisted and Wet Chemical Etching of Silicon Nanostructures,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 24(4), Jul./Aug. 2006, 1474-1479.
Konstantatos et al., “Engineering the Temproal Response of Photoconductive Photodetectors via Selective Introduction of Surface Trap States,” Nano Letters, v. 8(5), pp. 1446-1450 (Apr. 2, 2008).
Konstantatos et al., “PbS Colloidal Quantum Dot Photoconductive Photodetectors: Transport, Traps, and Gain,” Appl. Phys. Lett., v. 91, pp. 173505-1-173505-3 (Oct. 23, 2007).
Kray, D. et al.; Laser-doped Silicon Soalr Cells by Laser Chemical Processing (LCP) exceeding 20% Efficiency; 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference; 3 pages; May 2008; IEEE.
Kroning et al.; X-ray Imaging Systems for NDT and General Applications; 2002; Fraunhofer Institute for Nondestructive Testing; Saarbrucken and Dresden, Germany.
Kryski; A High Speed 4 Megapixel Digital CMOS Sensor; 2007 International Image Sensor Workshop; Jun. 6-10, 2007.
Li, “Design and Simulation of an Uncooled Double-Cantilever Microbolometer with the Potential for .about.mK NETD,” 2004, Sensors and Actuators A, 351-359, vol. 112, Elsevier B.V.
Li et al., “Gettering in High Resistive Float Zone Silicon Wafers,” Transaction on Nuclear Science, vol. 36(1), pp. 290-294 (Feb. 1, 1989).
Li, Hongsong et al.; An experimental study of the correlation between surface roughness and light scattering for rough metallic surfaces; Advanced Characterization Techniques for Optics, Semiconductors, and Nanotechnologies II; 2005; pp. 25780V-1-25780V-15; vol. 5878; SPIE Bellingham, WA.
Lin, A. et al.; Optimization of Random Diffraction Gratings in Thin-Film Solar Cells Using Genetic Algorithms; 2007; 1 page; SSEL Annual Report.
Low Dose Technologies; Power Point.
Madzharov, et al.; “Light trapping in thin-firm silicon solar cells for superstrate and substrate configuration” Abstract #1614, 218.sup.th ECS Meeting .COPYRGT. 2010 the Electrochemical Society.
Mateus; C.F.R. et al.; Ultrabroadband Mirror Using Low-Index Cladded Subwavelength Grating; Photonics Technology Letters; vol. 16, Issue No. 2; pp. 518-520; Feb. 2004; IEEE.
Matsuno, Shigeru et al.; Advanced Technologies for High Efficiency Photovoltaic Systems; Mitsubishi Electric Advance; vol. 122; pp. 17-19; Jun. 2008.
Meynants, et al.; “Backside illuminated global shutter COMOS image sensors”; 2011 International Image Sensor Workshop; Jun. 11, 2011.
Moloney, A.M. et al.; Novel Black Silicon PIN Photodiodes; 8 pages; Jan. 25, 2006; SPIE.
Moses; Nuclear Medical Imaging—Techniques and Challenges; Power Point; Feb. 9, 2005; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Department of Functional Imaging.
Murkin, JM and Arangol, M, “Near Infrared spectroscopy as an index of rain and tissue oxygenation,” Bri. J. of Anathesia (BJA/PGA Supplement):13-il3 (2009).
Munday, J.N. et al.; Large Integrated Absorption Enhancement in Plasmonic Solar Cells by Combining Metallic Gratings and Antireflection Coatings; Nano Letters; vol. 11, No. 6; pp. 2195-2201; Oct. 14, 2010; American Chemical Society.
Nauka et al., Intrinsic Gettering in Oxygen-Free Silicon; App. Phys. Lett., vol. 46(7), Apr. 4, 1985.
Nauka et al., “New Intrinsic Gettering Process in Silicon Based on Interactions of Silicon Interstitials,” J. App. Phys., vol. 60(2), pp. 615-621, Jul. 15, 1986.
Nayak et al, “Semiconductor Laesr Crystallization of a-Si:H,” SPIE Digital Library, 2003, 277-380, vol. 4977, Bellingham, Washington. 2003.
Nayak et al, “Ultrafast-Laser-Assisted Chemical Restructuring of Silicon and Germanium Surfaces,” Applied Surface Science, 2007, 6580-6583, vol. 253, Issue 15, Elsevier B.V.
Nayak et al, “Semiconductor Laser Crystallization of a-Si:H on Conducting Tin—Oxide-Coated Glass for Solar Cell and Display Applications,” Applied Physics A, 2005, 1077-1080, 80, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nayak, B.K. et al.; Ultrafast Laser Textured Silicon Solar Cells; Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.; vol. 1123; 6 pages; 2009; Materials Research Society.
Nayak, et al.; “Efficient light trapping in silicon solar cells by ultrafast-laser-induced self-assembled micro/nano structures”; Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications; 2011.
Oden, et al.; “Optical and Infrared Detection Using Microcantilevers;” SPIE Digital Library on Oct. 13, 2010; vol. 2744; 10 pages.
Pain, Bedabrata; Backside Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors; 2009 IISW Symposium on Backside Illujination of Solid-State Image Sensors, Bergen Norway; Jun. 25, 2009; pp. 1-23.
Pain, Bedabrata; “A Back-Illuminated Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor”; http://hdl.handle.net/2014/39312; May 1, 2005.
Payne, D.N.R. et al.; Characterization of Experimental Textured ZnO:Al Films for Thin Film Solar Cell Applications and Comparison with Commercial and Plasmonic Alternatives; Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC); pp. 1560-1564; 2010; IEEE.
Pedraza et al., “Silicon Microcolumn Arrays Grown by Nanosecond Pulsed-Excimer Laser Irradiation”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999, 74 (16), 2322-2324, American Institute of Physics.
Pedraza et al., “Surface Nanostructuring of Silicon”, Appl. Phys. A, 2003, 77, 277-284.
Rashkeev et al., “Hydrogen passivation and Activation of Oxygen Complexes in Silicon,” American Institute of Physics, vol. 78(11), pp. 1571-1573 (Mar. 12, 2001).
Russell, et al.; “Nanosecond Eximer Laser Processing for Novel Microelectronic Fabrication”; Nanosecond Excimer Laser Processing; 6 pages; 1989.
Russell, Ramirez, Kelley, “Nanosecond Excimer Laser Processing for Novel Microelectronic Fabrication,” SSC Pacific Technical Reports , pp. 228-233, 2003, vol. 4, US Navy.
Sai, H. et al.; Enhancement of Light Trapping in Thin-Film Hydrogenated Microcrystalline Si Solar Cells Using Back Reflectors with Self-Ordered Dimple Pattern; Applied Physics Letters; vol. 93; 2008; American Institute of Physics.
Sanchez et al., “Whiskerlike Structure Growth on Silicon Exposed to ArF Excimer Laser Irradiation”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1996, 69 (5), 620-622.
Sanchez et al., “Dynamics of the Hydrodynamical Growth of Columns on Silicon Exposed to ArF Excimer-Laser Irradiation”, Appl. Phys. A, 66, 83-86 (1998).
Sarnet et al.; “Femtosecond laser for black silicon and photovoltaic cells”; Feb. 21, 2008, Proc. of SPIE; vol. 6881; pags 1-15.
Senoussaoui, N. et al.; Thin-Film Solar Cells with Periodic Grating Coupler; Thin Solid Films; pp. 397-401; 2003; Elsevier B.V.
Serpenguzel et al., “Temperature Dependence of Photluminescence in Non-Crystalline Silicon”, Photonics West (San Jose, CA, 2004) 454-462.
Shen et al., “Formation of Regular Arrays of Silicon Micorspikes by Femotsecond Laser Irradiation Through a Mask”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 82, 1715-1717 (2003).
Solar Energy Research Institute, “Basic Photovoltaic Principles and Methods,” Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., NY 1984, pp. 45-47 and 138-142.
Stone et al.; The X-ray Sensitivity of Amorphous Selenium for Mammography;.Am. Assoc. Phys. Med.; Mar. 2002; pp. 319-324; vol. 29 No. 3; Am. Assoc. Phys. Med.
Szlufcik, J. et al.; Simple Integral Screenprinting process for selective emitter polycrystalline silicon solar cells; Applied Physics Letters; vol. 59, No. 13; Sep. 23, 1991; American Institute of Physics.
Tabbal et al., “Formation of Single Crystal Sulfur Supersaturated Silicon Based Junctions by Pulsed Laser Melting”. 2007, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B25(6), 1847-1852.
Takayanagi, et al.; “A 600.times.600 Pixel, 500, fps CMOS Image Sensor with a 4.4 jum Pinned Photodiode 5-Transistor Global Shutter Pixel”; 2007 International Image Sensor Workshop; Jun. 6-10, 2007.
Tower, John R. et al.; Large Format Backside Illuminated CCD Imager for Space Surveillance; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 1; Jan. 2003; pp. 218-224.
Tull; “Femtosecond Laser Ablation of Silicon: Nanoparticles, Doping and Photovotaics”; Harvard University, Jun. 2007 (Thesis).
Uehara et al., “A High-Sensitive Digital Photosensor Using MOS Interface-Trap Charge Pumping,” IEICE Electronics Express, 2004, vol. 1, No. 18, 556-561.
Wilson, “Depth Distributions of Sulfur Implanted Into Silicon as a Function of Ion energy, Ion Fluence, and Anneal Temperature,” 1984, Appl. Phys. 55(10, 3490-3494.
Winderbaum, S. et al.; Reactive ion etching (RIE) as a method for texturing polycrystalline silicon solar cells; Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells; 1997; pp. 239-248; Elsevier Science B.V.
Wu et al., “Black Silicon: A New Light Absorber,” APS Centennial Meeting (Mar. 23, 1999).
Wu et al., “Femtosecond laser-gas-solid interactions,” Thesis presented to the Department of Physics at Harvard University, pp. 1-113, 126-136, Aug. 2000.
Wu et al., “Visible Luminescence From Silicon Surfaces Microstructured in Air”. Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 81, No. 11, 1999-2001 (2002).
Wu, et al “Near-Unity Below-Band-Gap Absorption by Microstructured Silicon,” 2001, Applied Physics Letters, 1850-1852, vol. 78, No. 13, American Institute of Physics.
Xu, Y., et al, “Infrared Detection Using Thermally Isolated Diode,” Sensors and Actuators A, Elsevier Sequoia S.A., 1993, vol. 36, 209-217, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yablonovitch, et al.; “Intensity Enhancement in Textured Optical Sheets for Solar Cells”; .COPYRGT. 1982 IEEE.
Yamamoto, K. et al.; NIR Sensitivity Enhancement by Laser Treatment for Si Detectors; Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A; pp. 520-523; Mar. 31, 2010; Elsevier.
Yan, B.; Light Trapping Effect from Randomized Textures of Ag/ZnO Back Reflector on Hyrdrogenated Amorphous and Nanocrystalline Silicon Based Solar Cells; Thin Film Solar Technology II; vol. 7771; 2010; SPIE.
Yasutomi, et al.; “Two-Stage Charge Transfer Pixel Using Pinned Diodes for Low-Noise Global Shutter Imaging”; 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop; Mar. 28, 2009.
Younkin et al., “Infrared Absorption by Conical Silicon Microstructures Made in a Variety of Background Gases Using Femtosecond-Laser Pulses”, J. Appl. Phys., 93, 2626-2629 (2003).
Younkin, “Surface Studies and Microstructure Fabrication Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses,” Thesis presented to the Division of Engineering & Applied sciences at Harvard University (Aug. 2001).
Yuan, et al.; “Efficient black silicon solar cell with a density-graded nanoporous surface: Optical properties, performance limitations, and design rules”; American Institute of Physics; Applied Physics Letters 95. 1230501 (2009) 3 pages.
Zaidi, S.H. et al.; Diffraction Grating Structures in Solar Cells; Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2000; 4 pages; Sep. 2000; IEEE.
Zhang et al, “Ultra-Shallow P+-Junction Formation in Silicon by Excimer Laser Doping: a Heat and Mass Transfer Perspective,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1996, 3835-3844, vol. 39, No. 18, Elsevier Science Ltd., Great Britain.
European Search Report, dated Jun. 28, 2016, in corresponding European Patent Application No. 14752193.4 (10 pages).
Carey, P.G. et al., “In-situ Doping of Silicon Using Gas Immersion Laser Doping (GILD) Process,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 43, 325-332 (1989).
Chiang, Wen Jen et al., “Silicon Nanocrystal-Based Photosensor on Low-Temperature Polycrystalline-Silicone Panels”, Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 51120-1-51120-3, Ltt. 91, American Inst. Of Physics, Melville, NY.
Chichkov, B.N. et al, “Femtosecond, picosecond and nanosecond laser ablation of solids” Appl. Phys. A 63, 109-115; 1996.
Cilingiroglu et al., “An evaluation of MOS Interface-Trap Charge Pump as and Ultralow Constant-Current Generator,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuit, 2003, vol. 38, No. 1, Jan. 2003, 71-83.
Clapham, P.B. et al, “Reduction of Lens Reflexion by the Moth Eye Principle” Nature, vol. 244. Aug. 1973, pp. 281-282.
Gibbons, J., “Ion Implantation in Semiconductors-Part II; Damage Production and Annealing”, proceedings of the IEEE vol. 60, No. 9 pp. 1062-1096. Jun. 1972.
Gloeckler et al. Band-Gap Grading in CU(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids; 2005; pp. 189-194; vol. 66.
Igalson et al. Defect States in the Cigs Solar cells by Photocapacitance and Deep Level Optical Spectroscopy; Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences; 2005; pp. 157-161; vol. 53(2).
“Masimo Rainbow SET Pulse CO-Oximetry,” 2010, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, California, http://www.masimo.com/Rainbow/about.htm.
Moon et al. Selective emitter using porous silicon for crystalline silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, v. 93, pp. 846-850 (2009).
Myers, Richard et al., “Enhancing Near-IR Avalanche Photodiodes Performance by Femtosecond Laser Microstructuring” Harvard Dept. Of Physics.
Palm et al. CIGSSe Thin Film PB Modules: From Fundamental Investigators to Advanced Performance and Stability; Thin Solid Films; 2004; pp. 544-551; vol. 451-2.
Wu et al., “Black Silicon” Harvard UPS 1999.
Zhu et al., “Evolution of Silicon Surface Microstructures by Picosecond and Femtosecond Laser Irradiations,” Applied Surface Science, 2005, 102-108, Elsevie, Amsterdam, NL.Ultra-Shallow P+-Junction Formation in Silicon by Excimer Laser Doping: a Heat and Mass Transfer Perspective, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1996, 3835-3844, vol. 39, No. 18, Elsevier Science Ltd., Great Britain.
Ziou et al., “Depth from defocus using the hermite transform”, Image Processing, 1998. ICIP 98. Intl. Conference on Chicago, IL. Oct. 1998 pp. 958-962.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140313386 A1 Oct 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61765599 Feb 2013 US